Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2010 Sexual Dimorphism in Perissodactyl Rhinocerotid Chilotherium wimani from the Late Miocene of the Linxia Basin (Gansu, China)
Shaokun Chen, Tao Deng, Sukuan Hou, Qinqin Shi, Libo Pang
Author Affiliations +

Sexual dimorphism is reviewed and described in adult skulls of Chilotherium wimani from the Linxia Basin. Via the analysis and comparison, several very significant sexually dimorphic features are recognized. Tusks (i2), symphysis and occipital surface are larger in males. Sexual dimorphism in the mandible is significant. The anterior mandibular morphology is more sexually dimorphic than the posterior part. The most clearly dimorphic character is i2 length, and this is consistent with intrasexual competition where males invest large amounts of energy jousting with each other. The molar length, the height and the area of the occipital surface are correlated with body mass, and body mass sexual dimorphism is compared. Society behavior and paleoecology of C. wimani are different from most extinct or extant rhinos. M/F ratio indicates that the mortality of young males is higher than females. According to the suite of dimorphic features of the skull of C. wimani, the tentative sex discriminant functions are set up in order to identify the gender of the skulls.


Chilotherium wimani Ringström, 1924 is a middle-sized fossil rhinoceros referred to the subfamily Aceratheriinae, and established on materials from Fugu, Shaanxi, China (Ringström 1924); the morphology of this species is relatively well known. Deng (2001a) described more skulls and mandibles of this species from Fugu, and Deng (2001b, 2002) also discussed the cranial ontogenesis and characters of limb bones of C. wimani from the late Miocene, Linxia Basin, Gansu Province. As Deng (2006) remarked, C. wimani was the most abundant taxon in the late Miocene “Hipparion fauna” of the Linxia Basin and represented a basal form among the known species of Chilotherium. The presence of sexual dimorphism in C. wimani was observed by Deng (2001b), but only based on two skulls. Plentiful skulls of C. wimani were found in the Linxia Basin, and these materials provided us an indispensable sample which allowed us to highlight the sexual dimorphism of C. wimani in the late Miocene.

Sexual dimorphism is common among perissodactyls in the fossil record. Gingerich (1981) discovered sexual dimorphism in the Eocene equoid Hyracotherium. Radinsky (1963, 1967) found sexual dimorphism in the primitive tapiroids Homogalax and Isectolophus and the hyracodontid Hyrachyus. Coombs (1975) recognized dimorphism in the chalico-there Moropus. Fortelius and Kappelman (1993) and Antoine et al. (2004) discussed dimorphism in giant hyracodontid rhinocerotoids.

Sexual dimorphism is variable in living and extinct rhinos. Pocock (1945) and Groves (1982) recognized that Rhinoceros sondaicus (the Javan rhino) and Dicerorhinus sumatrensis (the Sumatran rhino) have dimorphic incisors, but are not clearly dimorphic in body size or horn size. On the contrary, Rhinoceros unicornis (the greater one-horned rhino) is dimorphic in body size and incisor size (Dinerstein 1991a). Owen-Smith (1988) pointed out that Ceratotherium simum (the white rhino) is sexually dimorphic in body size and horn size whereas Diceros bicornis (the black rhino) is monomorphic. Numerous observations about sexual dimorphism have also been made in Miocene rhinos. Osborn (1898a, b) observed skulls of Teleoceras fossiger (late Miocene, North America), Subhyracodon occidentalis and Subhyracodon tridactylum (Oligocene, North America), and pointed out that these rhinos could be identified to gender on the basis of the lower tusk morphology. He also found many other dimorphic characters in extinct rhinoceroses: for example nasals and skulls are smaller in females. Dinerstein (1991b) pointed out that male rhinoceros predominantly inflict wounds with the lower incisors (i2) and to a lesser extent with the horn. Mead (2000) concluded that significant sexual dimorphism is evident in Teleoceras major (late Miocene, North America) in terms of cranial, mandibular, and post-cranial characters. Mihlbachler (2005) described tusk and body size dimorphism in Teleoceras proterum and Aphelops malacorhinus (late Miocene, North America). Mihlbachler (2007) discussed the sexual dimorphism and mortality bias in Menoceras arikarense from Agate Springs National Monument, United States (early Miocene).

Sexual dimorphism in two species of the Miocene rhinos in the Linxia Basin, Gansu, China has been noted. Deng (2005) described the sexual dimorphism of Chinese specimens referred to the elasmotheriine Iranotherium morgani, in which the male skull is more massive, with a larger nasal horn and stronger zygomas. Chilotherium wimani, which will be discussed in this paper, also has been mentioned previously (but based on two skulls only). According to Deng (2001b), the male C. wimani has a larger size and stronger build than the female. Many dimensions are larger in males, such as the nasal, supraorbital tubercle and the articular processes on the occipital part. Male nasal bones are thicker than in females, and the shape is different where the male has a lentoid section and female a half-lentoid section. The cranial dorsal profile of the male is strongly concave, whereas that of the female is nearly flattened. Deng (2001b) also noted that the cranial dorsal profile becomes more and more concave through ontogeny, and should be a characteristic of the male. The female occipital surface is more quadrate, while the male occipital surface is higher but narrower.

The terminology and morphological variables used in this paper follow those of Heissig (1972, 1999) and Guérin (1980). The measurements are according to Guérin (1980) and are given in mm and area in cm2. In addition, we also took other measurements such as the molar row length, the length, width and thickness of i2, maximal and minimal width of symphysis.

Institutional abbreviation.—HMV, Hezheng Paleozoological Museum, Gansu, China.

Other abbreviations.—M, Male; F, Female.

Material and methods

The specimens of Chilotherium wimani studied here were collected from different localities in the Linxia Basin (Fig. 1) and are housed in the Hezheng Paleozoological Museum. They are all from the middle late Miocene. A detailed field correlation indicates that these localities are from the same horizon, i.e., the middle part of the Liushu Formation, within a grey orange or yellow brown silty mudstone or muddy siltstone (Liang and Deng 2005).

Fig. 1.

Map of the Linxia Basin showing the fossil localities (triangles) where Chilotherium wimani were found.


Fig. 2.

Skulls of perissodactyl rhinocerotid Chilotherium wimani Ringström, 1924 (Liushu Formation, late Miocene, Linxia Basin, Gansu, China) with articulated mandibles. A. Female (HMV 1426). B. Male (HMV 1451).


Chilotherium wimani could be identified to gender on the basis of lower tusk (i2: Figs. 2, 3). C. wimani have lost their incisors, except for the tusk-like i2. The i2 is very well developed, and its cross section is a narrow and round triangle; the left and right incisors diverge from each other in curvature, pointing laterally. The i2 extends outward, upward, and then forward (Deng 2001a). The root of the male i2 is ellipsoidal, while in the female it tends to be round. Kurtén (1969) suggested that, as a common observation, tusks in males were usually better developed than in females among many groups of fossil mammals, which was also pointed in extinct rhinocerotids by Antoine (2002) and by Antoine et al. (2004) in giant rhinocerotids. Mihlbachler (2005) and Prothero (2005) also concluded that the tusks were commonly dimorphic in extinct rhinos.

In our study, all materials were sexed a priori by the tusks, except for one skull in which gender was assumed on the basis of symphyseal morphology. Length, width and thickness of i2 are very significant sexual dimorphic parameters (p < 0.01), in which the male/female ratios are 2.02, 1.67, and 1.25. Kurtosis and skewness indicate a slight deviation from a normal distribution, except that the measurement for the width of male i2 is the best normal distribution (Kurt = -0.13, Skew = -0.05). Length, width and thickness data of complete i2 specimens clearly contained “male” and “female” size clusters (Fig. 4A). The length of i2 is the most dimorphic character (Table 1).

Fig. 3.

Tusks (i2) and symphyses of perissodactyl rhinocerotid Chilotherium wimani Ringström, 1924 (Liushu Formation, late Miocene, Linxia Basin, Gansu, China). A. Female (HMV 1450). B. Male (HMV 0746).


Because materials found in the Linxia Basin are lacking the postcranial skeleton and we could not identify the gender without the lower tusks, only measurements of skulls and their articulated mandibles were investigated in order to correlate other cranial characters with sexually dimorphic i2 and mandibular symphysis morphology. In Chinese C. wimani, the paired tusks of males are broken or worn at one or both tips in our collection, while tusks of females are always in better condition. Even so, we could still estimate the length of tusks and “sex” these materials easily.

To avoid age-related character variability, only adult specimens with intact structures allowing full measurements to be taken were used (age estimation is based on Liang and Deng 2005 and Hitchins 1978). Seventy-four adult skulls with their articulated mandibles, corresponding to 41 females and 33 males, were measured. Not every measurement was accessible on each skull and mandible, because of factors such as breakage, distortion, and incomplete preparation. For example, only 70 measurements of i2s and symphysis (39 females and 31 males) were used. Each measurement was taken from one side only (right or left, whichever side is less deformed) on each individual.

Table 1.

Statistic variable for tusks of adult Chilutherium wimani. Abbreviations: CV, coefficient of variation; DR, dimorphic ratio (male value/female value); i2L, length of i2 crown; i2T, thickness at base of i2 crown; i2W, width at base of i2 crown; Kurt, kurtosis; p, value of the Student's t-test (sig. [2-tailed]); SD, standard deviation; Skew, skewness; SW, value of the Shapiro-Wilk test.


For each measurement, we calculated the mean, maximum, minimum, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, kurtosis, skewness, Shapiro-Wilk test and used the two-tailed Student's t-test to test the significance of the dimorphism between male and female (Tables 13). Correlations are treated as potentially very significant whenever p < 0.01, significant whenever p < 0.05 and not significant whenever p > 0.05. We also calculated dimorphic ratios (male value/female value) from the mean of each measurement. Occipital surface area was calculated as: area = (a+b) × h/2, where a is width of occipital crest, b is width of mastoid processes and h is height of occipital surface.


All sexually dimorphic characters in Chilotherium wimani are quantitative in nature (Table 2); there are no readily detectable presence/absence (qualitative) characters. As Kurtén (1969) mentioned, qualitative characters are those present in one sex and absent in the other, while quantitative characters, posing serious taxonomic problems for many species or subspecies, differ mainly in size, are much more common and significant in study of fossil materials.

Fig. 4

Sexual dimorphism in tusks (i2s) and symphyses of Chilotherium wimani. A. Tusks. B. Symphyses.


Table 2.

Sexual dimorphic characters and the morphometric analysis for adult Chilotherium wimani. Abbreviations: AWS, maximal width of symphysis; CV, coefficient of variation; DAR, antero-posterior diameter of ascending ramus; DBO, distance between nasal notch and orbit; DNB, distance between nasal tip and bottom of nasal notch;DR, dimorphic ratio (male value/female value); HHp3, height of horizontal ramus in front of p3; HHp4, height of horizontal ramus in front of p4; HOS, height of occipital surface; IWS, minimal width of symphysis; Kurt, kurtosis; LSP, length of symphysis; p, value of the Student's t-test (sig. [2-tailed]); SD, standard deviation; Skew, skewness; SW, value of the Shapiro-Wilk test; WLT, width between lacrimal tubercles; WMP, width of mastoid processes; WOC, width of occipital crest; WPC, minimal width between parietal crests; WZA, maximal width between zygomatic arches.


Fig. 5.

Sexual dimorphic scatter plots of Chilotherium wimani. A. Occipital surface. B. Occipital surface area. C. Mandible. D. Length of upper molar teeth.


Characteristics of the symphysis are remarkably dimorphic. Sexual dimorphism for length of mandible, maximal and minimal width of symphysis are obvious. For the three measurements, two-tailed student's t-test indicates very significant dimorphism (p < 0.01), and the M/F ratios are 1.05, 1.19, and 1.10, respectively. Low skewness and kurtosis indicate that the distributions of those measurements are closer to normality than those for tusks. Maximal width of symphysis is the most dimorphic character; height of horizontal ramus in front of p3 is also a very significant sexually dimorphic character (p < 0.01). Fig. 4B illustrates the height of horizontal ramus in front of p3, length and maximal width of symphysis, showing the degree of sexual dimorphism in the anterior part of mandible (symphysis).

Via the analysis of the measurements, other very significant sexual dimorphisms are found in C. wimani, including the width of mastoid processes (p < 0.01) and height of occipital surface (p < 0.01) (Fig. 5A). The M/F ratio of the former is 1.06, and the latter 1.07. Skewness and kurtosis indicate these measurements in both genders are not normally distributed, except the width of mastoid processes of the females. Width of mastoid processes for most males ranges about 190–210 mm, while the females about 170–190 mm. Height of occipital surface for most males ranges about 115–150 mm, while the females about 110–130 mm. The sexual dimorphism in occipital surface area is also very significant (Fig. 5B).

Furthermore, there are some significant dimorphic characters. M/F ratios of antero-posterior diameter of the ascending ramus and length of mandible are 1.02 and 1.03, but both p < 0.05. Length of the mandibles for most males ranges about 450–480 mm, while those for females ranges about 420–480 mm. Antero-posterior diameter of ascending ramus for most males ranges about 135–155 mm, while in females the range is 130–150 mm. Skewness and kurtosis indicate better normal distribution, except the antero-posterior diameter of ascending ramus of female. Fig. 5C shows the degree of sexual dimorphic for the posterior part of mandible using minimal width of symphysis and length of mandible.

Mean values of males for distance between nasal notch and orbit, width of occipital crest, width between lacrimal tubercles, maximal width between zygomatic arches and height of horizontal ramus in front of p4 are larger, while distance between nasal tip and bottom of nasal notch and minimal width between parietal crests are smaller; all of these dimorphisms are not statistically different, however. Particularly, the measurements of minimal width between parietal crests and height of horizontal ramus in front of p4 indicate good M/F ratios (0.91 and 1.04) and normal distributions, but both are not statistically significant (p > 0.05) (see Table 2).

Table 3.

Other crano-mandibular morphometric analysis for adult Chilotherium wimani. Abbreviations: CHM1, cranial height in front of M1; CHM3, cranial height in front of M3; CHP2, cranial height in front of P2; CV, coefficient of variation; DNO, distance between nasal tip and occipital crest; DNTO, distance between nasal tip and orbit; DOLT, distance between occipital crest and lacrimal tubercle; DOM3, distance between occipital condyle and M3; DON, distance between occipital condyle and nasal tip; DOP, distance between occipital condyle and premaxillary bone; DOPP, distance between occipital crest and postorbital process; DOST, distance between occipital crest and supraorbital tubercle; DR, dimorphic ratio (male value/female value); HBm3, height of horizontal ramus in back of m3; HHm1, height of horizontal ramus in front of m1; HHm2, height of horizontal ramus in front of m2; HHm3, height of horizontal ramus in front of m3; HJC, height of jaw in condyle; HJCP, height of jaw in coronoid process; IWB, minimal width of braincase; Kurt, kurtosis; LM, length of mandible; p, value of the Student's t-test (sig. [2-tailed]); SD, standard deviation; Skew, skewness; SW, value of the Shapiro-Wilk test; WEO, width between exterior borders of occipital condyles; WFM, width of foramen magnum; WNB, width of nasal base; WPP, width between postorbital processes; WST, width between supraorbital tubercles.



Sexual selection is generally believed to be the principal cause of sexual dimorphism. The difference between the genders is influenced by the relative investment of the sexes. Dinerstein (1991b) pointed out that rhinoceros males predominantly inflicted wound with the lower incisors (i2), and this fight-related mortality seemed to be prevalent in extant rhino populations. Mihlbachler (1999, 2003) inferred social behaviors for Teleoceras proterum and Aphelops malacorhinus from attritional fossil assemblages from the Love Bone Bed and Mixon's Bone Bed localities in Florida, United States, and considered the damage of tusks contributing to combat. Based on these inferences, fight-related mortality for male Chilotherium wimani was probably one of the causes of death in the Linxia Basin assemblage. The tusks of male C. wimani are larger and usually broken and/or more worn than those of the female; the interpretation of these phenomena might be the increased agonistic interactions among the males during sexual combat.

In C. wimani, the sexually dimorphic characters of the mandibular bone should be related to the huge tusks in the male and smaller tusks in the female. Robusticity of the mandible in males is plausibly linked to supporting the huge tusks. Deng (2001a) noted that, in dorsal view, the mandibular symphysis became a particularly broad shovel and its posterior border was at the p3 level. The root of i2 influenced the height of horizontal ramus in front of p3 reciprocally, so this was also a very significant sexually dimorphic character. Height of the horizontal ramus in front of p4 is also deeper in males and M/F ratio could be found for this character but it is not significantly dimorphic. Comparing the degree of sexual dimorphism in the tusks (i2s), the shovel symphysis and the posterior part of mandible, the morphological changes associated with a larger i2 in males are the highly sexually dimorphic regions in the mandible; the ascending ramus in the posterior mandible is not as sexually dimorphic.

A robust mandible presumably needs muscularity and a thick ascending ramus. Masseter (from zygomatic arch to ascending ramus), buccinators (from ascending ramus to anguli oris and orbicularis oris) and zygomaticus (from zygomatic arch to anguli oris) in male should be sturdier. Greater size of these muscles is presumed to be reflected in a stronger ascending ramus and zygomatic arch. Antero-posterior diameter of the ascending ramus is significantly larger in male. The mean maximal width between zygomatic arches is larger in males, but not significantly so. Larger maximal width between zygomatic arches and width of mastoid processes indicate males having wider and more massive skulls. A more powerful neck musculature was probably present to support the massive skull and robust mandible in males.

Body mass should also be dimorphic between sexes in C. wimani. Large occipital surface area indicates a massive skull and robust neck, correlated with large body mass. Janis (1990) explained that the height of occipital surface (distance between the base of foramen magnum and the top of the occipital region) showed one of the best correlations with body mass in perissodactyls (r2 = 0.971). However, none of Chilotherium body weight has been estimated via the height of occipital surface (in our study, distance between the crest of foramen magnum and the top of the occipital region) or occipital surface area. There is a positive correlation among higher occipital surface, larger occipital surface area and larger body mass. Therefore, it can be assumed that there was sexual dimorphism in body mass to some extent. We measured the length of a sample of upper molars (Fig. 5D), which showed another strong correlation with body mass in all ungulates (r2 = 0.92, Janis 1990). The body mass for both genders of C. wimani could be compared through this proxy: males have larger body mass than females, though not highly significant.

In the elasmotheriine Iranotherium morgani, as Deng (2005) mentioned, one qualitatively dimorphic character is present: the male has a hemispherical hypertrophy on zygomatic arches while the female has no such structure. Comparing genders of I. morgani, Deng (2005) found additional sexually dimorphic characters in the nasal born boss, the zygomatic arch and the anterior part of the nasals, and considered those differences to be functions of the larger horn boss in the male and the smaller in the female. The nasal horn boss of the male is much rougher and implies a larger horn than that of the female. Prominent rugosities on a rhino's skull are generally considered to be horn bosses, as they are associated with the terminal nasal horn (Qiu and Yan 1982; Ginsburg and Heissig 1989; Antoine, 2002; Deng 2005). The sexually dimorphic characters of the male and female skulls of I. morgani show that the male skull is more massive and robust, with a larger nasal horn and stronger zygomas. These features, especially the huge nasal horn, could be used for defense or competition for mating right. I. morgani shows higher degrees of sexual dimorphism in these aspects than any of the extant rhinoceros species, but the sexual dimorphism of body mass in I. morgani is still unknown.

In Teleoceras major, as Mead (2000) mentioned, the most significant dimorphic feature is i2 diameter. Osborn (1898a) already speculated that Teleoceras males had larger tusks than females. The width of the mastoid processes, distance between nasal tip and occipital crest, length of mandible, and height of jaw at the condyle are also larger in the male. Mead's (2000) analysis indicates that differences are significant for those characters. Male means are larger in all cranial and mandibular characters that Mead (2000) measured, except the angle of the mandibular symphysis. In Chilotherium wimani, the sexual dimorphism in the length of the mandible is partially attributable to the enlarged i2 in males. Size-range overlap is evident in all mandibular characters except in i2 diameter in Teleoceras major, while in Chilotherium wimani, only the length of i2 crown is diagnostic. The sexually dimorphic characters show that T. major males have more massive heads than females, and probably, just like C. wimani, necks as well. Estimates of body mass, based on non-length long-bone dimensions, suggest an M/F value between 1.13 and 1.23 in T. major.

Table 4.

Comparison of sexual dimorphism in five species of rhinos.


In the extant rhinos, the difference between genders is variable. Rhinoceros sondaicus and Dicerorhinus sumatrensis have dimorphic characters in incisors rather than in body mass or horn size, while Diceros bicornis is monomorphic (Pocock 1945; Groves 1982; Owen-Smith 1988). Ceratotherium simum is sexually dimorphic in horn size, body and neck mass (Owen-Smith 1988; Berger 1994), and adult males C. simum are estimated to be about 25—43% heavier than females (Owen-Smith 1988). Rhinoceros unicornis is dimorphic in incisor size, body mass and neck musculature, and adult male R. unicornis can be 1,000 kg heavier than females in captivity but essentially a slightly larger version of females in the wild (Dinerstein 1991a).

As Liang and Deng (2005) demonstrated, the age structure pattern of the C. wimani fossils found in the Linxia Basin was consistent with that of a living population, and a natural catastrophe was the likely cause of death. C. wimani fossils found in the Linxia Basin were mostly preserved en masse. They are dominant in number of individuals in all sites of the Linxia Basin's late Miocene Hipparion fauna, indicating that they are most likely herding mammals. Trivers (1972) surmised that the stronger the dimorphism in a species, the more likely it is to be polygynous, and he though that was a generally concept in behavioral ecology. Applying this concept to C. wimani, the observed degree of sexual dimorphism tends to indicate the presence of polygyny in the Linxia Basin populations.

The cranial and mandibular dimorphism in C. wimani approaches that seen in the extinct Iranotherium morgani from China, T. major from North American and the extant C. simum and R. unicornis. In China, I. morgani is known from only a few materials (Deng 2005). The extant rhinoceros R. unicornis are typically solitary and rarely form small temporary groups, while C. simum always form small groups (Sheng 1985) (Table 4). Mead (2000) suggested that ecological analogues rather than closest living relatives may provide the best models for exploring the expected degree of sexual dimorphism in extinct taxa and the ecological affinity of T. major was similar to extant Hippopotamus amphibius rather than extant rhinoceros species. On the contrary, Mihlbachler (2005) denied the popular belief that Teleoceras was ecologically or behaviorally convergent upon Hippopotamus or other large herding artiodactyls.

As Mazak (2004) mentioned, the degree of sexual dimorphism is closely related to geographic variation. For example, Asiatic rhino species prefer to reside in alluvial flood-plain vegetation of sub-tropical climate where water and green grasses are available all year round. The late Miocene fauna in the Linxia Basin is composed of Promephitis parvus, Parataxidea sinensis, Hyaenictitherium wongii, Dinocrocuta gigantea, Tetralophodon exoletus, at least five species of Hipparion, Acerorhinus hezhengensis, Chilotherium wimani, Iranotherium morgani, Diceros gansuensis, Chalicotherium sp., Ancylotherium sp., Hezhengia bohlini, Cervavitus novorossiae, Metacervulus sp., Samotherium sp., Honanotherium schlosseri, Sinotragus sp., Palaeotragus sp., Gazella sp., and Miotragocerus sp. According to the features of faunal components, C. wimani should live in steppes. Analytical results of carbon isotopes of tooth enamel also show a cooling and aridity environment in the north side of the Tibetan Plateau since the middle Miocene (Hou et al. 2006). Sexually dimorphic, large bodied, herding herbivorous mammals, such as gnu (Connochaetes taurinus), zebra (Equus burchellii) and musk ox (Ovibos moschatus), may provide better ecological analogues for C. wimani.

In our study, M/F adult ratio is 33:41 = 1:1.24, with minimum collection bias because specimens were collected regardless of sex. Male-male combat is likely to be most intense in areas where the ratio between breeding-age males and females is close to or exceeds parity with males greatly over-represented (Dinerstein 1991a). Berger (1994) mentioned that evidence from many sexually dimorphic mammals indicated that males experience greater mortality than females. Young male C. wimani mortality, just like some living mammals, might have been higher than females. A reason for this might be the presence of competition with adult or the danger from predatory mammals.

From the analysis, it can be found that most non-dimorphic characters are more variable in females than in males. Among the very significant dimorphic characters, only the length of symphysis follows this trend. This might indicate that males tend to invest their energy to develop secondary characteristics utilized in combat; while in female, emphasis is absent and variation exists in most other characters. In these sexually dimorphic mammals, males apparently invest large amounts of energy into competing with other males for mating right or leadership, thus a selective pressure will promote the evolution of dimorphic traits.

C. wimani can be “sexed” easily by the mandible. However, more isolated skulls were found in the Linxia Basin. Even those very significant characters in skulls, like the width of mastoid processes and height of occipital surface, cannot be used to “sex” those skulls, because of the high degree of overlap in these characters between the sexes. According to the morphology of the skull of C. wimani, tentative sex discriminant functions are set up by Bayes discriminant analysis in order to identify the gender of the skulls (Table 5). The discriminant functions and its classification results are:

X1 = width between mastoid processes; X2 = height of occipital face; X3 = distance between nasal tip and bottom of nasal notch; X4 = cranial height in front of M1.

When Y1 > Y2, the skull should be a female, otherwise be male. In this function, 87.9% of original grouped cases are correctly classified, and 81.8% of cross-validated grouped cases are correctly classified. If these four characters can be measured, we can infer the likely sex of the individual. Although the gender of skulls cannot be identified exactly, the discriminant functions should be a better way and grope to distinguish large samples for paleoecological work.

Table 5.

Classification results of the discriminant functionsa,b.



Thanks for staff in Hezheng Paleozoological Museum, especially Shanqin Chen and Wen He. We are grateful to Zhijie Jack Tseng (Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, California, United States) for his linguistic improvements. Thanks to Kurt Heissig (München, Germany), Pierre-Olivier Antoine (Toulouse, France), and an anonymous referee for their valuable comments. This work is supported by the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-YW-Q09), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40730210, J0930007), and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2006CB806400).



P.-O. Antoine 2002. Phylogénie et évolution des Elasmotheriinae (Mammalia, Rhinocerotidae). Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 188: 1–359. Google Scholar


P.-O. Antoine , S.M.I. Shah , I.U. Cheema , Crochet J.-Y. , D. de Franceschi , L. Marivaux , G. Métais , and J.L. Welcomme 2004. New remains of the baluchithere Paraceratherium bugtiense (Pilgrim, 1910) from the late/latest Oligocene of the Bugti Hills, Baluchistan, Pakistan. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 24: 71–77.  http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.jaes.2003.09.005  Google Scholar


J. Berger 1994. Science, conservation, and black rhinos. Journal of Mammalogy 75: 298–308.  Google Scholar


M.C. Coombs 1975. Sexual dimorphism in chalicotheres (Mammalia, Perissodactyla). Systematic Zoology 24: 55–62.  Google Scholar


T. Deng 2001a. New materials of Chilotherium wimani (Perissodactyla, Rhinocerotidae) from the late Miocene of Fugu, Shaanxi. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 39: 129–138. Google Scholar


T. Deng 2001b. Cranial ontogenesis of Chilotherium wimani (Perissodactyla, Rhinocerotidae). In: T. Deng and Y. Wang (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Chinese Society of Vertebrate Paleontology , 101–112. China Ocean Press, Beijing. Google Scholar


T. Deng 2002. Limb bones of Chilotherium wimani (Perissodactyla, Rhinocerotidae) from the late Miocene of the Linxia Basin in Gansu, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 40: 305–316. Google Scholar


T. Deng 2005. New discovery of Iranotherium morgani (Perissodactyla, Rhinocerotidae) from the late Miocene of the Linxia Basin in Gansu, China, and its sexual dimorphism. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25:442–450.;2  Google Scholar


T. Deng 2006. Neogene rhinoceroses of the Linxia Basin (Gansu, China). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 256: 43–56. Google Scholar


E. Dinerstein 1991a. Effects of Rhinoceros unicornis on riverine forest structure in lowland Nepal. Journal of Wildlife Management 55: 401–411.  Google Scholar


E. Dinerstein 1991b. Sexual dimorphism in the greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis). Journal of Mammalogy 72: 45–457.  Google Scholar


M. Fortelius and J. Kappelman 1993. The largest land mammal ever imagined. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 108: 85–101.  Google Scholar


P.D. Gingerich 1981. Variation, sexual dimorphism, and social structure in the early Eocene horse Hyracotherium (Mammalia, Perissodactyla). Paleobiology 7: 443–455. Google Scholar


L. Ginsburg and K. Heissig 1989. Hoploaceratherium, a new generic name for “Aceratheriumtetradactylum. In: D.R. Prothero and R.M. Schoch (eds.), The Evolution of Perissodactyla , 418–421. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar


P. Groves 1982. The skulls of Asian rhinoceroses: wild and captive. Zoo Biology 1: 251–261.  Google Scholar


C. Guérin 1980. Les rhinocéros (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) du Miocène terminal au Pléistocène supérieur en Europe occidentale: comparaison avec les espèces actuelles. Documents du Laboratoire de Géologie de I'Université de Lyon, Sciences de la Terre 79: 1–1184. Google Scholar


K. Heissig 1972. Paläontologische und geologische Untersuchungen im Tertiär von Pakistan, 5. Rhinocerotidae (Mamm.) aus den unteren und mittleren Siwalik-Schichten. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abhandlungen, Neue Folge 152: 1–112. Google Scholar


K. Heissig 1999. Family Rhinocerotidae. In G. E. Rössner and K. Heissig (eds), The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe , 175–188. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany. Google Scholar


P.M. Hitchins 1978. Age determination of the black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis Linn.) in Zululand. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 8: 71–80. Google Scholar


S.K. Hou , T. Deng , and Y. Wang 2006. Stable carbon isotopic evidence of tooth enamel for the late Neogene habitats of the Hipparion fauna in China. In W. Dong (ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Chinese Society of Vertebrate Paleontology , 85–94. China Ocean Press, Beijing. Google Scholar


M.C. Janis 1990. Correlation of cranial and dental variables with body size in ungulates and macropodoids. In: J. Damuth and B.J. MacFadden (eds.), Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology: Estimation and Biological Implications , 255–299. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar


B. Kurtén 1969. Sexual dimorphism in fossil mammals. In: G.E.G. Westermann (ed.), Sexual Dimorphism in Fossil Metazoa and Taxonomic Implications. International Union of Geological Sciences, Series A1: 226–233. E. Schweizerbart' sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart. Google Scholar


Z. Liang and T. Deng 2005. Age structure and habitat of the rhinoceros Chilotherium during the late Miocene in the Linxia Basin, Gansu, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 43: 219–230. Google Scholar


J.H. Mazak 2004. On the sexual dimorphism in the skull of the tiger. Mammalian Biology 69: 392–400.  Google Scholar


J.A. Mead 2000. Sexual dimorphism and paleoecology in Teleoceras, a North American Miocene rhinoceros. Paleobiology 26: 689–706.;2  Google Scholar


M.C. Mihlbachler 1999. Population structure and implications for social behavior in Miocene Florida rhinoceroses. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19: 64A. Google Scholar


M.C. Mihlbachler 2003. Demography of late Miocene rhinoceroses (Teleoceras proterum and Aphelops malacorhinus) from Florida: linking mortality and sociality in fossil assemblages. Paleobiology 29: 412–428.;2  Google Scholar


M.C. Mihlbachler 2005. Linking sexual dimorphism and sociality in rhinoceroses: insights from Teleoceras proterum and Aphelops malachorhinus from the late Miocene of Florida. Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History 45: 495–520. Google Scholar


M.C. Mihlbachler 2007. Sexual dimorphism and mortality bias in a small Miocene North American rhino, Menoceras arikurense: Insights into the coevolution of sexual dimorphism and sociality in rhinos. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 14: 217–238.  Google Scholar


H.F. Osborn 1898a. A complete skeleton of Teleoceras fossiger. Notes upon the growth and sexual characters of this species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 10: 51–59. Google Scholar


H.F. Osborn 1898b. The extinct rhinoceroses. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History 1 (3): 75–164. Google Scholar


R.N. Owen-Smith 1988. Meguherbivores: the Influence of Very Large Body Size on Ecology. 369 pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar


R.I. Pocock 1945. A sexual difference in the skulls of Asiatic rhinoceroses. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 115: 319–322. Google Scholar


D.R. Prothero 2005. The Evolution of North American Rhinoceroses. 228 pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar


Z. Qiu and D. Yan 1982. A horned Chilotherium skull from Yushe, Shansi. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 20: 122–132. Google Scholar


L. Radinsky 1963. Origin and early evolution of North American Tapiroidea. Peabody Museum of Natural History Bulletin 17: 1–106. Google Scholar


L. Radinsky 1967. Hyrachyus, Chasmotherium, and the early evolution of helaletid tapiroids. American Museum Novitates 2313: 1–23. Google Scholar


T. Ringström 1924. Nashörner der Hippurion-fauna Nord-Chinas. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series C 1 (4): 1–159. Google Scholar


H.L. Sheng 1985. Perissodactyla and Artiodactyla [in Chinese]. In: H.L. Sheng , P.C. Wang , H.J. Lu , and L.B. Zhu (eds.), Introduction to Mammalogy , 211–247. East China Normal University Press, Shanghai. Google Scholar


R.L. Trivers 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971 , 136–179. Aldine Press, Chicago. Google Scholar
Shaokun Chen, Tao Deng, Sukuan Hou, Qinqin Shi, and Libo Pang "Sexual Dimorphism in Perissodactyl Rhinocerotid Chilotherium wimani from the Late Miocene of the Linxia Basin (Gansu, China)," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 55(4), 587-597, (1 December 2010).
Received: 7 January 2009; Accepted: 22 April 2010; Published: 1 December 2010

Back to Top