Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2012 The Last Cretaceous Ammonites in Latin America
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Sections yielding late Maastrichtian ammonite assemblages are rare in Latin America and precise biostratigraphic correlation with European type sections remains difficult. In all, the extinction pattern of ammonites appears to differ between sites in southern high latitudes and those in the tropics to subtropics. In austral sections of Chile, and possibly also in southern Argentina, diverse assemblages range throughout most of the substage and then show a gradual decline prior to the Cretaceous—Paleogene (K—Pg) boundary. Further north, in northeast Brazil, only two genera (Diplomoceras, Pachydiscus) range into the uppermost Maastrichtian, but disappear within the last 0.3 Ma of the Cretaceous. In tropical sections of Columbia and Mexico, the decline of ammonites started earlier and Sphenodiscus is the last ammonite known to occur in the late Maastrichtian. In all sections revised here the disappearance of ammonites was completed prior to the end of the Maastrichtian and was thus independent of the asteroid impact at, or near, the end of the Cretaceous.

Introduction

Ammonites are characteristic and abundant components of Mesozoic invertebrate assemblages that disappeared at or near the end of the Cretaceous, during the Cretaceous—Paleogene (K—Pg) mass extinction. It is widely debated whether this extinction was catastrophic, precisely at the K—Pg boundary, or gradual, extending over several hundred thousands of years of the latest Maastrichtian, or whether some ammonites even extended into the earliest Paleogene (Wiedmann 1988; Kennedy 1989, 1993; Birkelund 1993; Surlyk and Nielsen 1999; Jagt et al. 2003; Machalski 2005a, b; Machalski and Heinberg 2005; Machalski et al. 2009; Jagt-Yazykova and Jagt 2006; Landman et al. 2007, 2010, 2012; Machalski et al. 2011).

The most diverse assemblages of late to latest Maastrichtian age are known from northern high-latitude sites in Denmark (Birkelund 1993), the Netherlands (Jagt 2002), Poland (Machalski 2005a, b), northern Greenland (Birkelund 1965), and New Jersey (Landman et al. 2004a, b, 2007, 2010, 2012). The Biscay area (southwest France, northern Spain) is characterised by intermediate-latitude to boreal environmental conditions. In this region, ammonites also reach up almost to the K—Pg boundary (Kennedy 1993; Ward and Kennedy 1993; Rocchia et al. 1999).

Diverse ammonite assemblages of latest Maastrichtian age are also known from southern high-latitude localities in South India (Kennedy and Henderson 1992a, b), Australia (Henderson and McNamara 1985; Henderson et al. 1992), New Zealand (Henderson 1970), Angola (Howarth 1965), South Africa (Kennedy and Klinger 1975, 1976, 1977, 1979, 1985, 2006; Klinger and Kennedy 1993, 1997, 2001, 2003, 2005), and Antarctica (Howarth 1966; Macellari 1986; Olivero and Zinsmeister 1989; Zinsmeister et al. 1989; Crame et al. 1991; Zinsmeister and Feldmann 1996; Olivero and Medina 2000).

Tropical or subtropical Tethyan localities with latest Maastrichtian ammonites, on the other hand, are scarce, the only exception known to us being El Kef in Tunesia (Goolaerts et al. 2004; Goolaerts 2010), the GSSP for the base of the Paleogene. At this site, an abundant and relatively diverse ammonite assemblage has been collected from a 5 m thick interval corresponding to a maximum flooding surface between 7 and 2 m below the K—Pg boundary iridium anomaly (Goolaerts et al. 2004; Goolaerts 2010). The top of this assemblage was dated as the middle of planktonic foraminiferal zone CF1 by (Li et al. 2000) and is thus 0.2 Ma older than the K—Pg boundary.

Latin American sections with late Maastrichtian ammonite assemblages are rare. Here we briefly revise the state of knowledge regarding these localities. Certainly, the Quinquina Formation in central Chile contains the most diverse assemblage known to date (Stinnesbeck 1986, Salazar et al. 2010), but other southern high-latitude localities were described from southern Chile (Lahsen and Charrier 1972; Macellari 1988; WS and CS, personal observations) and the Argentinian Río Turbio (Hünicken 1965) and Neuquén areas (Keller et al. 2007). The Poty quarry in Pernambuco, Brazil (Stinnesbeck and Keller 1996) and upper Maastrichtian outcrops in northeast Mexico represent localities of intermediate to low latitudes.

Fig. 1.

Palaeogeographical map of the world during the Maastrichtian (after Blakey 2002), illustrating ammonite-bearing localities, with the Latin American sections mentioned in the text shown in black.

f01_717.jpg

Institutional abbreviations.—CPUC, Colección Paleontológica de la Universidad de Concepción, Chile; IMG, Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; IGH, Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Heidelberg, Germany.

Other abbreviations.—CF, foraminiferal zone; FO, first occurrence; GSSP, Global Stratotype Section and Point; LO, last occurrence; P1, Paleogene foraminiferal zone 1; UZA, cycle.

Geological setting

Subdivisions of the Maastrichtian

The Campanian—Maastrichtian boundary was dated 70.6 ± 0.6 Ma at Tercis, GSSP for that boundary in southwest France, based on the arithmetic mean of twelve biohorizons corresponding to the first or last occurrences (FO and LO, respectively) of stratigraphically important macroand microfossil taxa (Odin and Lamaurelle 2001; Gradstein et al. 2004). The FO of Pachydiscus (Pachydiscus) neubergicus is one of three ammonite markers used in this definition. The boundary between the early and late Maastrichtian, however, has not been defined formally yet (Ogg et al. 2004); its position has experienced many changes in definition. Suggestions included the placement of the boundary at the FO of the planktic foraminifer Abathomphalus mayaroensis (see Nederbragt 1991), but it is now known that this is diachronous, the species occurring earlier at high latitudes. Other authors have proposed a lower-upper Maastrichtian boundary based on the FO of another planktic foraminifer, Rosita contusa. The FO of this species also defines the base of biozone CF 6 of Li and Keller (1998a, b) and coincides with the FO of the Western Interior Seaway ammonite Hoploscaphites birkelundae, which was selected as boundary marker for this region (Walaszczyk et al. 2001). Numerically, the FO of H. birkelundae was placed at 69.5 Ma within the upper part of C31R (Gradstein et al. 1995), which corresponds to the FO of Racemiguembelina fructicosa or the base of biozone CF 6. A third alternative is to equate the boundary with the FO of the planktic foraminifer Racemiguembelina fructicosa at the base of CF 4 (Li et al. 1999), at 68.3 Ma. Here we follow the latter view.

Late Maastrichtian ammonites in Latin American sections

Patagonia.—Outcrops of uppermost Cretaceous to lower Paleogene sediments exist in the Austral basin of southern Patagonia on both sides of the border between Chile and Argentina, near Puerto Natales and Río Turbio, along the Seno Skyring Fjord and in Brunswick Peninsula (Malumian et al. 1983; Riccardi 1988; see Fig. 1). The Cerro Cazador Formation in this region, rich in invertebrates, has previously been studied by, among others, Wilckens (1905), Paulcke (1905), Cecioni (1956a), Macellari (1988), and Griffin and Hiinicken (1994). Based on the ammonite assemblages, most authors have suggested the Cerro Cazador Formation to be of Campanian—Maastrichtian age (e.g., Riccardi 1988), but Macellari (1985, 1988) indicated that the uppermost fossil-bearing unit (above unit h) may reach the Paleocene, or even Eocene. The gastropod assemblage agrees with such an interpretation (Griffin and Hünicken 1994), showing close affinities with the Roca and Salamanca formations in northern and central Patagonia, as well as with the Wangaloa Formation in New Zealand. Among the ammonites, Baculites rioturbioensis, Pseudophyllites peregrines, Diplomoceras austral, Maorites densicostatus, M. suturalis, and Grossouvrites gemmatus (see Hünicken 1965) are closely related to or conspecific with taxa from central Chile.

In the Magellanes province of southern Chile, additional K—Pg boundary sections exist in the Seno Skyring region. The presence of both macro-and microfossils permits calibration of ammonite ages with foraminifer-based biozones. In this area, the Fuentes Formation has yielded Pseudophyllites peregrines, Gaudryceras varagurense patagonicum, Polyptychoceras sp., Maorites densicostatus, Gunnarites spp., and other ammonites (Charrier and Lahsen 1968a, b). Foraminifera such as Abathomphalus mayaroensis and Bolivinoides draco dorreeni confirm a late Maastrichtian age (Lahsen and Charrier 1972). The Rocallosa Formation overlies the Fuentes Formation and also contains ammonites and foraminifera of a late Maastrichtian age (Charrier and Lahsen 1968a, b; Hünicken et al. 1975, 1980; Riccardi 1988). However, the position of the K—Pg boundary is a matter of dispute in this sedimentary sequence which reaches approximately 1000 m in thickness. On foraminiferal evidence, Natland et al. (1974) placed it within the upper Rocallosa Formation, while Charrier and Lahsen (1968a, b) and Lahsen and Charrier (1972) suggested that it was placed within the overlying Chorillo Chico or Tres Morros formations (see Lahsen and Charrier 1972: text-fig 3). This latter unit is rich in bivalves and gastropods but ammonites are characteristically absent.

The youngest Late Cretaceous assemblage from the Magallanes Basin, described by Macellari (1988), is dominated by Maorites densicostatus, with Grossouvrites gemmatus forming another characteristic element, albeit less common. This faunal assemblage is well established for the Cerro Cazador Formation in Argentina (Hünicken 1955, 1965), the Río Blanco Formation in Brunswick Peninsula, and the Río Garcia Formation to the west of Lago Lynch, Tierra del Fuego, but confusion exists regarding the highest ammonite level in the Seno Skyring area. There Gunnarites elegans and G. bhavaniformis (Lahsen and Charrier 1972) are known from the upper Fuentes Formation, but Maorites is characteristically absent, thus differing from similar stratigraphic levels at Río Turbio and in Seymour Island (Antarctic Peninsula). Maorites has never been identified in the Seno Skyring area, with the possible exception of Tres Morros in Brunswick Peninsula. The absence of the Maorites assemblage in the Seno Skyring area may thus be the result of erosion or non-deposition. This interpretation agrees with observations by Cecioni (1956a, b), who postulated that the boundary between the “lower Tertiary” Chorrillo Chico and the Maastrichtian Rocallosa formations was an unconformity.

Neuquén Basin, Argentina.—Upper Cretaceous to lower Paleogene sediments are well exposed in the Neuquén Basin in central-south Argentina. These strata, assigned to the Jagüel Formation, consist of olive-green, friable calcareous claystone with relatively common exogyrine oysters, occasional pectinids and other bivalves (e.g., ?Malletia, Nucula, Panopea), gastropods and very rare baculitid ammonites.

A sequence (8 m thick) of the upper Jagüel Formation was sampled at Lomas Coloradas (LC), located 10 km northwest of Bajada de Jagüel and approximately 1 km east of provincial road No. 8. The section consists of 3.5 m of olive-green claystone and overlying 4.5 m of oyster-rich marls. A coquina layer at 1.5 m of the section contains abundant oysters and pectinid bivalves, as well as a single specimen of Eubaculites sp. (ex gr. E. simplex). This ammonite is of definite Maastrichtian age, and this can be constrained further as late Maastrichtian, based on correlation with the well-dated Bajada de Jagüel section. At Bajada de Jagüel, Keller et al. (2007) documented planktic foraminfera of zone CF 2 from the baculitid-bearing shale unit. The K—Pg boundary itself is not present, because a hiatus encompasses biozones CF 1 and P1a–b. However, ammonites are already extremely rare in biozone CF 2, which precedes the K—Pg transition by about 0.4 Ma (Keller et al. 2007).

Quiriquina Formation, Chile.—This unit, in central Chile, has long been known for its abundance of well-preserved and highly diverse ammonites. Monographic revisions of the assemblage by Stinnesbeck (1986) and Salazar et al. (2010) have documented 30 species in 17 genera. They are late Maastrichtian in age, based on the occurrence of Hypophylloceras (Neophylloceras) surya, Zelandites varuna, Pachydiscus (P.) jacquoti, Diplomoceras cylindraceum, Baculites anceps, Eubaculites carinatus, Hoploscaphites constrictus, Menuites fresvillensis, and other index taxa (Stinnesbeck 1996; Salazar et al. 2010). This fauna is exceptionally rich in phylloceratids and lytoceratids, which are rare in other Maastrichtian sections worldwide.

At Las Tablas, the type locality of the Quiriquina Formation in Quiriquina Island, ammonites are abundant in most of the 65 m thick section. Eubaculites carinatus is the commonest fossil in a unit of green siltstone with calcareous sandstone concretions. Co-occurring are Gaudryceras kayei, Kitchinites darwini, Maorites densicostatus, Phyllopachyceras (Neophylloceras) ramosum, Pseudophyllites indra, and Zelandites varuna, among others. In the uppermost 10 m of the Quiriquina Formation, however, Eubaculites carinatus is characteristically absent in the calcareous sandstone concretions at Las Tablas and other sections in the area, even though other ammonites are still present. These last ammonites of the Quiriquina Formation are Diplomoceras cylindraceum, Hypophylloceras (N.) ramosum, H. (N.) surya, and Hoploscaphites constrictus (at Cocholgüe) (Stinnesbeck 1986, 1996; Salazar et al. 2010).

In the uppermost 5 m of the Quiriquina Formation trace fossils (Teichichnus, Zoophycos) are particularly abundant, but macrofossils are rare. No ammonites have been recovered by us or any other authors but detritus-feeding bivalves (e.g., N. [Neilo] pencana, N. [N.] quiriquinae, Yoldia levitestata, Nuculana cocholguei, Tellina largillierti) occur and indicate quiet-water conditions and an abundance of organic matter. Small pyrite concretions are also indicative of stagnant water and reducing environments. The marine sequence of the Quiriquina Formation is truncated by a massive unit of cross-bedded yellow sandstone with conglomeratic lenses (Curanilahue Formation of Paleogene age), reflecting brackish to fluviatile conditions. Charcoaled wood and an isolated shark tooth (Isurus sp., from Tomé) are the only megafossils recovered to date.

The decline of ammonites in the Quiriquina Formation of central Chile thus appears to be gradual in the uppermost 10 metres of the section and resulted in a total extinction within the uppermost Maastrichtian, prior to the K—Pg boundary. No ammonites were recovered from the uppermost 5 metres of the section.

Poty, Brazil.—The Gramame Formation in the State of Pernambuco (northeast Brazil) is well known for its abundant megafauna (Maury 1936; Beurlen 1967; Mabesoone et al. 1968; Muniz 1993). Both the Maastrichtian and lower Paleogene are represented by marly limestone with abundant micro-and macrofauna (Stinnesbeck and Keller 1996). The Poty quarry, north of Recife, where the uppermost 9.5 metres of the Gramame Formation are mined, exposes a near-complete K—Pg boundary section. These Maastrichtian sediments contain typical late Maastrichtian calcareous nannofossil assemblages, such as Watznaueria barnesae, Micula decussate, and Micula murus. The planktic foraminiferal index marker of the last 0.3 Ma of the Maastrichtian, Plummerita hantkeninoides, has been noted in the uppermost 2 metres of this part of the section. Echinoids (Hemiaster), serpulids (Hamulus) as well as diverse planktic foraminifera are abundant and indicate a normal marine shelf environment with depths not exceeding 150 m (middle neritic). Ammonites are rare, but P. (Pachydiscus) neubergicus and Diplomocerus sp. have been collected at 100 and 80 cm, respectively, below the K—Pg boundary, within the P. hantkeninoides planktic foraminiferal zone (CF 1 in Table 1). About 70 cm below the boundary, the marly limestone is capped by a layer of brecciated marl and limestone. This breccia unit also contains bones, phosphatic lumps, phosphatised foraminifera, glauconite and small pyrite concretions which indicate reworking and erosion from nearshore areas. Stinnesbeck and Keller (1996) suggested that this layer represented the latest Maastrichtian low stand which in this region reduced water depth from the middle to an inner neritic environment, or by about 50 to 70 metres.

Fig. 2.

The last ammonite species in Latin America. A, B. Hoploscaphites constrictus quiriquiniensis (Wilckens, 1904). A. CPUC/Q/CO/3260, in apertural (A1) and right lateral (A2) views. B. CPUC/Q/CO/3382H, in left lateral view. C. Hypophylloceras (Neophylloceras) ramosum (Meek, 1857), CPUC/Q/ CO/2536, in apertural (C1) and right lateral (C2) views. A–C represent the last species recorded from the uppermost Maastrichtian of the Quiriquina Formation in Chile, ca. 6 m below the hiatus representing the K—Pg boundary (compare Salazar et al. 2010). D. Pachydiscus (P.) neubergicus (von Hauer, 1858), IMG 8671, from planktic foraminiferal zone CF 5, Cárdenas Formation (Maastrichtian), eastcentral Mexico. It was also recorded as one of the youngest species at the Poty quarry in Pernambuco, Brazil. E. Diplomoceras cylindraceum (Defrance, 1816), CPUC/Q/CO/2077 from the Quiriquina Formation (late Maastrichtian; Las Tablas bay, Quiriquina Island, Chile), but the taxon is cosmopolitan and among the last species recorded in many sections. F. Sphenodiscus pleurisepta (Conrad, 1857), IMG 8672, Cárdenas Formatio (Maastrichtian), eastcentral Mexico, in ventral (F1), left lateral (F2), and apertural (F3) views. This taxon is among the last species in many North American sections (Landman et al. 2004a, b; Ifrim and Stinnesbeck 2010).

f02_717.jpg

Pachydiscus and Diplomocerus are thus the last ammonite genera present and occur up to 100 and 80 cm below the K—Pg boundary, respectively. Both genera are also known to occur in the uppermost Maastrichtian sediments of Denmark (Birkelund 1979, 1993), the Bay of Biscay region of northern Spain and southwest France (Ward and Kennedy 1993) and the Antarctic Peninsula (Macellari 1986). In central Chile, Diplomocerus is a cosmopolitan generalist (sensu Ifrim et al. 2004) and one of the last surviving ammonites (Stinnesbeck 1986, 1996; Salazar et al. 2010). Pachydiscus neubergicus is a proxy fossil for the base of the Maastrichtian (Gradstein et al. 2004). However, the presence of this species in upper Maastrichtian sediments of northeast Brazil, approximately 1 metre below the K—Pg boundary and in sediments containing well-defined latest Maastrichtian planktic foraminiferal assemblages (Pachydiscus hantkeninoides Zone), indicates that this ammonite taxon extended into the latest Maastrichtian. This fact has previously been noted by Kennedy and Henderson (1992b) and Ward and Kennedy (1993).

Columbia.Sphenodiscus pleuriseptu has recently been recorded from the La Tabla Formation in the Upper Magdalena Valley, in siliciclastic sediments deposited in regressive a low stand system tracts (Patarroyo et al. 2010). This was a shallow-water taxon (e.g., Ifrim et al. 2005) which was widely distributed in northeast Mexico and the Western Interior Basin of North America where it ranged from the upper lower to the upper Maastrichtian (Ifrim and Stinnesbeck 2010). The Columbian specimens are associated with planktic foraminifera of late early Maastrichtian age (e.g., Gunsserinu gansseri). Towards the northern part of the Cretaceous Columbian Basin, i.e., towards Venezuela, a Maastrichtian unit known as the Mito Juan Formation contains Sphenodiscus and Coahuilites, but this has not yet been described in detail (Renz 1981, compare Patarroyo et al. 2010).

Northeast Mexico.—A large foreland basin developed north of the Sierra Madre Oriental (SMO) in an extended area of the Mexican states of Coahuila and Nuevo León. Sediment accumulation in this foreland reaches >6000 m in thickness and is known as the Difunta Group. The Difunta Group sediments accumulated in an enormous siliciclastic deltaic complex, fed by a river system located in Chihuahua and western Coahuila, and opened to the east into the ancient Gulf of Mexico. To the north, Difunta Group sediments gradually decrease in thickness and near the Rio Grande, some 300 km north of Saltillo, only 100–200 m of coeval sediments are present, referred to as the Escondido Formation (Cooper 1971). The Difunta sedimentary complex is mostly Campanian to Maastrichtian in age, but it occasionally reaches the Paleogene (McBride et al. 1974; Vega-Vera et al. 1989; Soegaard et al. 2003; Vega et al. 2007). East and south of this sedimentary complex, the coeval Mendez Formation was deposited under open marine conditions and consists of marl and shale containing pelagic faunal assemblages. From the Difunta Group area, several ammonite assemblages have been described and interpreted, of different ages and facies (Wolleben 1977; Vega-Vera and Perrilliat 1990; Ifrim et al. 2004, 2005, 2010; Ifrim and Stinnesbeck 2010).

Nineteen ammonoid species, in 15 genera, and a single nautilid were described from the transition from pelagic (Mendez Formation) to neritic facies (Difunta Group) at the entrance to the Parras Basin during a sea level highstand. The assemblage consists of Tethyan (Baculites ovatus, Bruhmuites [Anubruhmuites] vishnu, Fresvillia constricta, Huuericerus rembdu, Puchydiscus [P.] ex gr. neubergicus, Solenocerus reesidei, Tetragonites cf. superstes), cosmopolitan (Anaguudrycerus politissimum, Desmophyllites diphylloides, Diplomocerus cylindruceum, Guudrycerus kuyei, Phyllopuchycerus forbesiunum, Pseudophyllites indru), and cold-water taxa (Fresvillia teres, Hypophyllocerus [Neophyllocerus] suryu, Huuericerus [N.] hetonuiense, Puchydiscus [P.] cf. egertoni). Eutrephocerus sp. and Menuites juv. sp. could not be identified to species level. A similar assemblage was described from the Méndez Formation at Cerralvo, Nuevo León, 100 km to the east. This assemblage consists of > 1000 specimens referred to 23 species in 18 genera. It is early Maastrichtian in age (biozone CF 7) and similar to the La Parra assemblage in composition and preservation. Zone CF 7 documents a short sea level lowstand. The Cerralvo fauna was interpreted to represent an ingression of coolor even cold-water faunal elements into the warm-water environment of the ancient Gulf of Mexico during CF 7, which caused a mixing of cephalopod assemblages from different latitudes and thus an increase in faunal diversity (Ifrim et al. 2004).

Of the twenty taxa described from La Parra, 20 km north of Saltillo, seventeen also occur in Cerralvo. Eutrephocerus sp., Puchydiscus (P.) cf. egertoni and P. (P.) juv. sp. are known only from La Parra, whereas Sughulinites cala, Zelandites varuna, Solenoceras texunum, Nostocerus (N.) colubriformis, Nostocerus (N.) ulternutum, Nostocerus (N.) rugosum and the ?coleoid Naefia neogaeia were recorded exclusively from Cerralvo. The diversity and abundance of cold-water species are higher in the open-shelf palaeoenvironment exposed near Cerralvo than at the entrance to the Parras and La Popa basins. Apparently, ammonites flourished around the lower-upper Maastrichtian boundary.

The precise biostratigraphic data allow for the reconstruction of migratory pathways of some ammonite species. Baculites ovatus migrated into the La Popa Basin as a result of the sea level highstand documented at La Parra during CF 5. Coeval with the Difunta Group, shallow-water deltaic complexes developed near the border with Texas and in central-east Mexico. The Escondido Formation of northeast Mexico and southern Texas contains shallow-water ammonites such as Coahuilites sheltoni, Sphenodiscus uberruns, S. lobutus, and S. pleuriseptu (Böse 1928; Cooper 1970; Ifrim et al. 2005). Puchydiscus colligutus, a species with a Tethyan (sensu lato) distribution, is also present (Böse 1928).

To the south, shallow-water sediments exist on the Late Cretaceous San Luis Potosí carbonate platform of central-east Mexico. These sediments, known as the Cárdenas Formation, were interpreted as wave-dominated, shoreface-delta system and show response to sea level changes similar to the Difunta Group (Schafhauser et al. 2007). In the lower Cárdenas Formation, Couhuilites sheltoni, Puchydiscus (P.) neubergicus and Sphenodiscus pleuriseptu have been identified (Ifrim et al. 2005). Puchydiscus (P.) neubergicus is a warm-water species with a Tethys (sensu lato)-wide distribution; the other species are considered shallow-water species, consistent with the sedimentary facies in which they were found. With the exception of Puchydiscus, the above assemblage corresponds to the shallow-water assemblages widely known from the Difunta Group.

Nostocerus (N.) ulternutum, N. (N.) colubriformis and N. (N.) rugosum are known from Cerralvo, but not from La Parra. These taxa were described exclusively form midto outer-shelf facies of the northern-northwestern Gulf of Mexico (Stephenson 1941; Cobban and Kennedy 1991a, b, 1993, 1995; Ifrim et al. 2004) and the Atlantic Coast (Cobban 1974; Kennedy and Cobban 2000). Individuals of these three species are abundant at Cerralvo (28.0%), and their absence at La Parra may be a result of palaeobathymetry; water depth at La Parra was considerably less than at Cerralvo. However, during that time nostoceratids became extinct worldwide (Goolaerts 2010), with a single exception recorded from the upper Maastrichtian of the Netherlands (Jagt et al. 2006).

Sphenodiscus pleuriseptu is the last ammonite in northeast Mexico; it occurs throughout the Maastrichtian up to 3 m below the K—Pg boundary in the La Popa Basin (Lawton et al. 2001). Sphenodiscids dispersed and radiated during the latest Campanian and Maastrichtian, until they went extinct at or near the Cretaceous—Paleogene boundary. Sphenodiscus was the last remaining taxon in Mexico; its shallow-water environment was subject to many short-term changes before terminal Maastrichtian events, and it may thus have been able to endure pre-K—Pg environmental changes.

Fig. 3.

The last ammonites in Brazil. A, C. Pachydiscus (Pachydiscus) neubergicus (von Hauer, 1858). A. IGH 1010, in ventral (A1) and left lateral (A2) views. C. IGH 1012, in right lateral (C1) and ventral (C2) views. B. Diplomocerus cylindruceum (Defrance, 1816), IGH 1011, in ventral (B1) and left lateral (B2) views. The three specimens were collected at Poty in the State of Pernambuco, where they occur in marly limestone approximately 5.5 m (A, B) and 1 m (C) below the K—Pg boundary.

f03_717.jpg

Table 1.

Occurrences of the last ammonites in Latin America. Where possible, the foraminiferal zone (see Li et al. 1999) is shown, or the last appearance is given in metres below the K—Pg boundary. The palaeobiogeographical subdivision is from Ifrim et al. (2004) and Salazar et al. (2010). Abbreviations: CF, Cretaceous foraminiferal zone (see Li et al. 1999); LM, lower Maastrichtinan; UM, upper Maastrichtian.

t01a_717.gif

Continued

t01b_717.gif

Migratory pathways of Sphenodiscus lobatus and S. pleuriseptu in North America were reconstructed from the precise dating of many occurrences throughout this continent. During the latest Campanian and early Maastrichtian, the two species immigrated into northeast Mexico coming from the south. Subsequently, S. lobutus disappeared from the fossil record in this region, whereas S. pleuriseptu persisted, as indicated by numerous Maastrichtian records from the region. Both species used changes of the sea level to migrate or disperse over the continent. They entered shallow-marine basins including the Western Interior Seaway during an early Maastrichtian sea level highstand (UZA 4.5) and characterise shallow-water settings during the final stages of this epicontinental sea. After the loss of this habitat, both species migrated along the Atlantic Coast, where their highest occurrences in New Jersey are close to the CretaceousPaleogene boundary. The dispersal route of Sphenodiscus during the Maastrichtian does not reflect a general dispersal pattern for ammonites in North America, as indicated by the opposing north-to-south migration trend of Baculites ovatus (Ifrim and Stinnesbeck 2010).

Discussion and conclusions

Some of the uncertainties regarding the timing and course of ammonite extinction relate to the fact that localities containing latest Maastrichtian ammonites are relatively scarce on a global scale. This paucity, or absence, of ammonites in marine sediments was also observed for Latin America, but may in part be the result of less detailed geoscientific research in this area. In addition, the Maastrichtian was a time of great changes in climate (Li and Keller 1998b), and thus in sea level and marine facies. These changes hamper a direct comparison of faunal assemblages from different stratigraphic levels within the Maastrichtian. In northeast Mexico, for instance, the abundant and diverse ammonite assemblage of La Parra relates to a sea level highstand in an otherwise shallow-marine deltaic environment, unsuited for ammonites other than sphenodiscids and occasional baculitids. This high sea level corresponds to the terminal stage of the Western Interior Seaway further to the north. The following drop in sea level at the end of UZA 4.5 (early late Maastrichtian) led to a halt in marine sedimentation in the Western Interior Seaway and thus to the final and complete disappearance of this major epicontinental habitat (Ifrim and Stinnesbeck 2010).

In part, the paucity of latest Maastrichtian faunas is also an artifact of biostratigraphic age control. Correlation with European type localites is still difficult to achieve based solely on ammonites; faunal provincialism and the frequent absence of age-diagnostic microfossils (coccolithophorids, planktic foraminifera) in sediments containing ammonites aggravate the problem. This is particularly true for the southernmost Latin American faunas described here, i.e., the Patagonian ammonites.

It is thus unclear at present whether the absence, or scarcity, of ammonites is a primary signal due to gradual extinction of taxa during the late Maastrichtian, e.g., illustrated by nostoceratids, or whether this is the result of a preservational bias related to the drop in sea level. However, in all sections described here, the abundance of ammonites decreases considerably in the last few metres below the boundary, even when the preservation potential remains the same, e.g., in the Gramame Formation of Brazil or the uppermost Maastrichtian of Mexico.

Another question is a possible climate-related component in the disappearance of ammonites. Their pattern of extinction appears to be different and diachronous between low-and high-latitude regions, initiating in the tropics and subtropics and progressively expanding towards high latitudes. In Latin America, the most abundant and diverse ammonite assemblages of unequivocally late Maastrichtian age are present in the austral sections of Chile and possibly southern Argentina. Diversity remained high throughout most of the substage and then declined rapidly, albeit prior to the K—Pg boundary. This may explain why ammonites generally disappear before the K—Pg boundary in lower latitudes, including the Latin American localities, even when a change in preservation potential cannot be observed. While sections in Neuquén may have been too shallow to allow for an abundant occurrence of ammonites, the subtropical Poty section in northeast Brazil was located in a middle-neritic environment. Despite this, only Diplomocerus and Puchydiscus range into the uppermost Maastrichtian and according to planktic foraminiferal data disappear within the last 0.3 Ma of the Cretaceous.

In consequence, many questions about the onset and progress of the global faunal crisis remain open. The current database indicates that the terminal decline and extinction of ammonites, commonly attributed to an asteroid or comet impact at the K—Pg boundary, began earlier, several hundreds of thousand years prior. By the time of the boundary, tropical and subtropical elements had almost gone. All terminal Maastrichtian Latin American populations described here were characterised by severely reduced species populations. These last survivors were either taxa specialised to changing environments, such as Sphenodiscus, or cosmopolitan species which occurred in a wide range of latitudes and environments during the Maastrichtian already, e.g., Diplomocerus and Puchydiscus in Brazil. Other more specialised taxa such as Nostocerus had already gone extinct. No single sudden kill mechanism, such as a bolide impact, can account for this gradual, progressive extinction pattern.

Acknowledgements

The Universidad de Concepción and the Instituto Antárctico Chileno provided transportation and logistic assistance in the field in Chile; special thanks to Luis Arturo Quinzio, Gerardo Flores (both Universidad de Concepción, Chile), and Marcelo Leppe Cártes (Instituto Nacional Antárctico Chileno, Punta Arenas, Chile). Research in Argentina would have been impossible without the assistance in the field of Hector Leanza (Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino, Buenos Aires, Argentina). In Mexico, José Guadelupe López Oliva (Facultad de Ciencias de la Tierra, UANL, Linares, Mexico) and Arturo González González (Museo del Desierto, Saltillo, Mexico) worked closely with us in the field and provided logistic assistance. We especially appreciate the valuable suggestions made to this manuscript by reviewers Marcin Machalski (Institut of Paleobiology, Polish Akademy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland) and Neil H. Landman (American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA) and guest editors Elena A. Jagt-Yazykova (University of Opole, Poland) and John W.M. Jagt (Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, the Netherlands). WS acknowledges support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (STI/128/6; STI/128/20) and BMBF project (CHL10/A09).

References

  1. K. Beurlen 1967. Paleontología da feixa sedimentar costeira Recife — Jono Pessoa. Boletin de lu Sociedad Brasileño Geológico 16: 73–79. Google Scholar
  2. T. Birkelund 1965. Ammonites from the Upper Cretaceous of West Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland 179: 1–192. Google Scholar
  3. T. Birkelund 1979. The last Maastrichtian ammonites. In : T. Birkelund and R.G. Bromley (eds.), Cretaceous—Tertiary boudary events , 51–60. University of Copenhagen Press, Copenhagen. Google Scholar
  4. T. Birkelund 1993. Ammonites from the Maastrichtian White Chalk of Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 40: 33–81. Google Scholar
  5. R. C. Blakey 2002. Global Map of the Late Cretaceous.  http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/∼rcb7/065Marect.jpgGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Böse 1928. Cretaceous ammonites from Texas and northern Mexico. University of Texus Bulletin 2748: 143–357. Google Scholar
  7. G. Cecioni 1956a. Distribuzione verticale di alcune Kossmaticeratidae nella Patagonia Cilena. Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana 74: 141–149. Google Scholar
  8. G. Cecioni 1956b. Significato della ornamentazione in alcune Kossmaticeratidae della Patagonia. Revistu Italianu de Puleontologiu e Stratigrafia 62: 3–10. Google Scholar
  9. R. Charrier and A. Lahsen 1968a. Contribution à l'étude de la limite Crétacé—Tertiaire de la Province de Magellan extrême-sud du Chili. Révue de Micropuléontologie 11: 111–120. Google Scholar
  10. R. Charrier and A. Lahsen 1968b. Stratigraphy of Late Cretaceous—Early Eocene Seno SkyringStrait of Magellan area, Magallanes Province, Chile. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 53: 568–590. Google Scholar
  11. W.A. Cobban 1974. Ammonites from the Navesink Formation at Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 845: 1–46. Google Scholar
  12. W.A. Cobban and W.J. Kennedy 1991a. Some Upper Cretaceous ammonites from the Nacatoch Sand of Hempstead County, Arkansas. United States Geological Survey Bulletin 1985: C1–C5. Google Scholar
  13. W.A. Cobban and W.J. Kennedy 1991b. Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) ammonites from the Nostoceras alternatum zone in southwestern Arkansas. United States Geological Survey Bulletin 1985: E1–E6. Google Scholar
  14. W.A. Cobban and W.J. Kennedy 1993. Upper Cretaceous ammonites from the Coon Creek Tongue of the Ripley Formation at its type locality in McNairy County, Tennessee. United States Geological Survey Bulletin 2073, B1–B12. Google Scholar
  15. W.A. Cobban and W.J. Kennedy 1995. Maastrichtian ammonites chiefly from the Prairie Bluff Chalk in Alabama and Mississippi. The Paleontological Society Memoir 69: 1–40. Google Scholar
  16. J.D. Cooper 1970. Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Escondido Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Maverick County, Texas, and Northern Mexico. 288 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin. Google Scholar
  17. J.D. Cooper 1971. Maestrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) biostratigraphy,Maverick County, Texas, and northern Coahuila, Mexico. Transactions of the Gulf Coast Association of the Geological Society 21: 57–65. Google Scholar
  18. J.A. Crame , D. Pirrie , J.B. Riding , and M.R.A. Thomson 1991. Campanian-Maastrichtian (Cretaceous) stratigraphy of the James Ross Island area, Antarctica. Journal of the Geological Society London 148: 1125–1140. Google Scholar
  19. S. Goolaerts 2010. Late Cretaceous ammonites from Tunisia: chronology and causes of their extinction and extrapolation to other areas. Aardkundige Mededelingen 21: 1–220. Google Scholar
  20. S. Goolaerts , W.J. Kennedy , C. Dupuis , and E. Steurbaut 2004. Terminal Maastrichtian ammonites from the Cretaceous—Paleogene Global Stratotype Section and Point, El Kef, Tunisia. Cretaceous Research 25: 313–328. Google Scholar
  21. F.M. Gradstein , J.G. Ogg , A.G. Smith , W. Bleeker , and L.J. Lourens 2004. A new geologic time scale, with special reference to Precambrian and Neogene. Episodes 27: 83–100. Google Scholar
  22. F.M. Gradstein , F. Agterberg , J.G. Ogg , J. Hardenbol , P. van Veen , J. Thierry , and Z. Huang 1995. A Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous time scale. In : J. Hardenbol (ed.), Geochronology, Time Scale and Global Stratigraphic Correlation. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication 54: 95–128. Google Scholar
  23. M. Griffin and M. Hünicken 1994. Late Cretaceous—early Tertiary gastropods from southwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Paleontology 68: 257–274. Google Scholar
  24. R.A. Henderson 1970. Ammonoidea from the Mata Series (Santonian—Maastrichtian) of New Zealand. Special Papers in Palaeontology 6: 1–82. Google Scholar
  25. R.A. Henderson and K.J. McNamara 1985. Maastrichtian nonheteromorph ammonites from the Miria Formation, Western Australia. Palaeontology 28: 35–88. Google Scholar
  26. R.A. Henderson , W.J. Kennedy , and K.J. McNamara 1992. Maastrichtian heteromorph ammonites from the Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia. Alcheringa 16: 133–170. Google Scholar
  27. M.K. Howarth 1965. Cretaceous ammonites and nautiloids fromAngola. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology) 10: 335–412. Google Scholar
  28. M.K. Howarth 1966. Ammonites from the Upper Cretaceous of James Ross Island Group. Bulletin of the British Antarctic Survey 10: 55–69. Google Scholar
  29. M. Hünicken 1955. Depositos neocretácicos y terciarios del extremo SSW de Santa Cruz (cuenca carbonífera de Río Turbio). Revista Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Naturales, Bernardino Rivadavia, Ciencias Geológicas 2: 1–161. Google Scholar
  30. M. Hünicken 1965. Algunos cefalópodos supracretácicos del Río Turbio (Santa Cruz). Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Serie de Ciencias Naturales 52: 49–80. Google Scholar
  31. M.A. Hünicken , R. Charrier , and A. Lahsen 1975. Baculites (Lytoceratina) de la Provincia de Magallanes, Chile. Actas I Congreso dePaleontología y Bioestratigrafía, Tucuman, Agosto de 1974 2: 115–140. Google Scholar
  32. M.A. Hünicken , R. Charrier , and A. Lahsen 1980. Baculites (Lytoceratina) de la base de la Formación Fuentes (Campaniano MedioSuperior) de la Isla Riesgo, Provincia de Magallanes, Chile. Boletin de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias, Cordoba 53: 221–235. Google Scholar
  33. C. Ifrim and W. Stinnesbeck 2010. Migration pathways of the late Campanian and Maastrichtian shallow facies ammonite Sphenodiscus in North America. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 292: 96–102. Google Scholar
  34. C. Ifrim , W. Stinnesbeck , and J.G. LopezOliva 2004. Maastrichtian cephalopods from the Méndez Formation at Cerralvo, northeastern Mexico. Palaeontology 47: 1575–1627. Google Scholar
  35. C. Ifrim , W. Stinnesbeck , and A. Schafhauser 2005. Maastrichtian shallowwater ammonites of northeastern Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas 22: 48–64. Google Scholar
  36. C. Ifrim , W. Stinnesbeck , R. Rodríguez Garza , and J.F. Ventura 2010. Hemipelagic cephalopods from the Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) Parras Basin at La Parra, Coahuila, Mexico, and their implications for the correlation of the lower Difunta Group. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 29: 597–618. Google Scholar
  37. J.W.M. Jagt 2002. Late Cretaceous ammonite faunas of the Maastrichtian type area. In : H. Summesberger , K. Histon , and A. Daurer (eds.), Cephalopods-Present and Past. Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt Wien 57: 509–522. Google Scholar
  38. J.W.M. Jagt , J. Smit , and A.S. Schulp 2003. ?Early Paleocene ammonites and other molluscan taxa from the AnkerpoortCurfs quarry (Geulhem, southern Limburg, the Netherlands). In : M.A. Lamolda (ed.), Bioevents: their stratigraphical records, patterns and causes,Caravaca, 3???rd–8th June 2003: 113. Ayuntamiento de Caravaca de la Cruz. Google Scholar
  39. J.W.M. Jagt , S. Goolaerts , E. JagtYazykova , G. Cremers , and W. Verhesen 2006. First record of Phylloptychoceras (Ammonoidea) from the Maastrichtian type area, The Netherlands. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 76: 97–103. Google Scholar
  40. E.A. JagtYazykova and J.W.M. Jagt 2006. Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) ammonite distribution in Europe: a summary of recent progress. In : A. Nowak and G. Hebda (eds.), Biodiversity of Quarries and Pits , 95–115. Opole Scientific Society, 3rd Department of Natural Sciences, Opole/Górażdże. Google Scholar
  41. G. Keller , T. Adatte , A.A. Tantawy , Z. Berner , W. Stinnesbeck , D. Stueben , and H.A. Leanza 2007. High stress late Maastrichtian—early Danian palaeoenvironment in the Neuquén Basin, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 28: 939–960. Google Scholar
  42. W.J. Kennedy 1989. Thoughts on the evolution and extinction of Cretaceous ammonites. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 100: 251–279. Google Scholar
  43. W.J. Kennedy 1993. Ammonite faunas of the European Maastrichtian; diversity and extinction. In : M.R. House (ed.), The Ammonoidea: Environment, Ecology, and Evolutionary Change. The Systematics Association Special Volume 47: 285–326. Google Scholar
  44. W.J. Kennedy and W.A. Cobban 2000. Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) ammonites from the Owl Creek Formation on northeastern Mississippi, U.S.A. Acta Geologica Polonica 50: 175–190. Google Scholar
  45. W.J. Kennedy and R.A. Henderson 1992a. Heteromorph ammonites from the Upper Maastrichtian of Pondicherry, south India. Palaeontology 35: 693–731. Google Scholar
  46. W.J. Kennedy and R.A. Henderson 1992b. Nonheteromorph ammonites from the Upper Maastrichtian of Pondicherry, south India. Palaeontology 35: 381–442. Google Scholar
  47. W.J. Kennedy and H.C. Klinger 1975. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. Introduction and stratigraphy. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology) 25: 265–317. Google Scholar
  48. W.J. Kennedy and H.C. Klinger 1976. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite family Phylloceratidae. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology) 27: 347–380. Google Scholar
  49. W.J. Kennedy and H.C. Klinger 1977. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite family Tetragonitidae Hyatt, 1900. Annals of the South African Museum 73: 149–197. Google Scholar
  50. W.J. Kennedy and H.C. Klinger 1979. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite family Gaudryceratidae. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology) 31: 121–173. Google Scholar
  51. W.J. Kennedy and H.C. Klinger 1985. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite Family Kossmaticeratidae Spath, 1922. Annals of the South African Museum 95: 165–231. Google Scholar
  52. W.J. Kennedy and H.C. Klinger 2006. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite family Pachydiscidae Spath, 1922. African Natural History 2: 17–166. Google Scholar
  53. H.C. Klinger and W.J. Kennedy 1993. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The heteromorph ammonite genus Eubaculites Spath, 1928. Annals of the South African Museum 102: 185–264. Google Scholar
  54. H.C. Klinger and W.J. Kennedy 1997. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite family Baculitidae Gill, 1871 (excluding the genus Eubaculites). Annals of the South African Museum 105: 1–206. Google Scholar
  55. H.C. Klinger and W.J. Kennedy 2001. Stratigraphic and geographic distribution, phylogenetic trends and general comments on the ammonite family Baculitidae Gill, 1871 (with and annotated list of species referred to the family). Annals of the South African Museum 107: 1–290. Google Scholar
  56. H.C. Klinger and W.J. Kennedy 2003. Observations on the systematics, geographic and stratigraphic distribution and origin of Diplomoceras cylindraceum (Defrance, 1816) (Cephalopoda: Ammonoidea). Annals of the South African Museum 110: 171–196. Google Scholar
  57. H.C. Klinger and W.J. Kennedy 2005. Additions to the upper Maastrichtian ammonite faunas fromRichardsBay, KwaZuluNatal, SouthAfrica. African Natural History 3: 117–121. Google Scholar
  58. A. Lahsen and R. Charrier 1972. Late Cretaceous ammonites from SenoSkyringStrait of Magellan area, Magellanes Province, Chile. Journal of Paleontology 46: 520–532. Google Scholar
  59. N.H. Landman , Garb,M.P ., R. Rovelli , D.S. Ebel , and L.E. Edwards 2012. Shortterm survival of ammonites in New Jersey after the endCretaceous bolide impact. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57: 703–715. Google Scholar
  60. N.H. Landman , R.O. Johnson , and L.E. Edwards 2004a. Cephalopods from the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary interval on the Atlantic Coastal Plain, with a description of the highest ammonite zones inNorth America. Part 1. Maryland andNorth Carolina. AmericanMuseum Novitates 3454: 1–64. Google Scholar
  61. N.H. Landman , R.O. Johnson , and L.E. Edwards 2004b. Cephalopods from the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary interval on the Atlantic Coastal Plain, with a description of the highest ammonite zones in North America. Part 2. Northeastern Monmouth County, New Jersey. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 287: 1–107. Google Scholar
  62. N.H. Landman , R.O. Johnson , M.P. Garb , L.E. Edwards , and F.T. Kyte 2007. Cephalopods from the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary interval on the Atlantic Coastal Plain,with a description of the highest ammonite zones in North America. Part III. Manasquan River Basin, Monmouth County, NewJersey. Bulletin of AmericanMuseum of NaturalHistory 303: 1–122. Google Scholar
  63. N.H. Landman , R.O. Johnson , M.P. Garb , L. Edwards , and F.T. Kyte 2010. Ammonites from the Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary, New Jersey, USA. In : K. Tanabe , Y. Shigeta , T. Sasaki , and H. Hirano (eds.), Cephalopods—Present and Past , 287–295. Tokai University Press, Tokyo. Google Scholar
  64. T.F. Lawton , F.J. Vega , K.A. Giles , and C. RosalesDomínguez 2001. Stratigraphy and origin of the La Popa Basin, Nuevo León and Coahuila,Mexico. American Association ofPetroleum GeologistsMemoir 75: 219–240. Google Scholar
  65. L. Li and G. Keller 1998a. Diversification and extinction in CampanianMaastrichtian planktic foraminifera of Northwestern Tunisia. Eclogae geologicae Helvetiae 91: 75–102. Google Scholar
  66. L. Li and G. Keller 1998b. Maastrichtian climate, productivity and faunal turnovers in planktic foraminifera on South Atlantic DSDP sites 525A and 21. Marine Micropaleontology 33: 55–86. Google Scholar
  67. L. Li , G. Keller , and W. Stinnesbeck 1999. The late Campanian and Maastrichtian in northwestern Tunisia: paleoenvironmental inferences from lithology, macrofauna and benthic foraminifera. Cretaceous Research 20: 231–252. Google Scholar
  68. L. Li , G. Keller , T. Adatte , and W. Stinnesbeck 2000. Late Cretaceous sealevel changes in Tunisia: a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of the Geological Society London 157: 447–458. Google Scholar
  69. J.M. Mabesoone , I.M. Tinoco , and P.N. Coutinho 1968. The Mesozoic—Tertiary boundary in northeastern Brazil. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 4: 161–185. Google Scholar
  70. C.E. Macellari 1985. Paleobiografía y Edad de Maorites—Gunnarites (Ammonoidea) del Cretácico Superior de la Antárctica y Patagonia. Ameghiniana 21: 223–242. Google Scholar
  71. C.E. Macellari 1986. Late Campanian-Maastrichtian ammonite fauna from Seymour Island (Antarctic Peninsula). The Paleontological Society Memoir 18: 1–55. Google Scholar
  72. C.E. Macellari 1988. Late Cretaceous Kossmaticeratidae (Ammonoidea) from the MagallanesBasin,Chile. Journal of Paleontology 62: 889–905. Google Scholar
  73. M. Machalski 2005b. Late Maastrichtian and earliest Danian scaphitid ammonites from central Europe: Taxonomy, evolution, and extinction. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 50: 653–696. Google Scholar
  74. M. Machalski 2005a. The youngest Maastrichtian ammonite faunas in Poland and their dating by scaphitids. Cretaceous Research 26: 813–836. Google Scholar
  75. Machalski M . and Heinberg C . 2005. Evidence for ammonite survival into the Danian (Paleogene) from the Cerithium Limestone at Stevns Klint, Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 52: 97–111. Google Scholar
  76. M. Machalski , J.W.M. Jagt , A.S. Alekseev , and E.A. JagtYazykova 2012. Terminal Maastrichtian ammonites from Turkmenistan, Central Asia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57: 729–735. Google Scholar
  77. M. Machalski , J.W.M. Jagt , C. Heinberg , N.H. Landman , and E. Håkansson 2009. Dańskie amonity - obecny stan wiedzy i perspektywy badań. Przegląd Geologiczny 57: 486–493. Google Scholar
  78. N. Malumian , F.E. Nullo , and V.A. Ramos , 1983. The Cretaceous of Argentina, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay. In : M. Moullade and A.E.M. Nairn (eds.), The Phanerozoic of the World II, The Mesozoic B , 265–303. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Google Scholar
  79. C.J. Maury 1936.O Cretaceo de Sergipe. Monografias do Serviço geologico e mineralogico de Brasil 11: 1–283. Google Scholar
  80. E.F. McBride , A.E. Weidie , J.A. Wolleben , and R.C. Laudon 1974. Stratigraphy and structure of the Parras and La Popa basins, northeastern Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin 85: 1603–1622. Google Scholar
  81. G. de C.B. Muniz 1993. Novos moluscos da Formaçao Gramame, Cretáceo Superior dos Estados da Paraíba e de Pernambuco, Noreste do Brasil . 202 pp. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Geología, Recife. Publicação Especial No. 1. Google Scholar
  82. M.L. Natland , E. Gonzàlez , A. Cañon , and M. Ernst 1974. A system of stages of Magellanes Basin sediments. Geological Society of America Memoir 139: 1–126. Google Scholar
  83. A.J. Nederbragt 1991. Late Cretaceous biostratigraphy and development of Heterohelicidae (planktic foraminifera). Micropaleontology 33: 97–149. Google Scholar
  84. G.S. Odin and M.A. Lamaurelle 2001. The global Campanian—Maastrichtian stage boundary. Episodes 24: 229–238. Google Scholar
  85. J.G. Ogg , F.P. Agterberg , and F.M. Gradstein 2004. The Cretaceous Period, 344–383. In : A. Smith (ed.), A Geological Timescale 2004. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar
  86. E.B. Olivero and W.J. Zinsmeister 1989. Large heteromorph ammonites from the Upper Cretaceous of Seymour Island, Antarctica. Journal of Paleontology 63: 626–636. Google Scholar
  87. E.B. Olivero and F.A. Medina 2000. Patterns of Late Cretaceous ammonite biogeography in southern high latitudes: the family Kossmaticeratidae in Antarctica. Cretaceous Research 21: 269–279. Google Scholar
  88. P. Patarroyo , P. Bengtson , and J. Guerrero 2010. Sphenodiscus pleurisepta (Conrad, 1857) from the Maastrichtian La Tabla Formation in the Upper Magdalena Valley, Tolima, Colombia. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 30: 104–110. Google Scholar
  89. W. Paulcke 1905. Die Cephalopoden der oberen Kreide Südpatagoniens. Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Freiburg 15: 167–248. Google Scholar
  90. O. Renz 1981. Venezuela. In : R. Reyment and P. Bengtson (eds.), Aspects of MidCretaceous Regional Geology , 197–220. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar
  91. A.C. Riccardi 1988. The Cretaceous system of southern South America. Geological Society of America Memoir 168: 1–161. Google Scholar
  92. R. Rocchia , E. Robin , J. Smit , O. Pierrard , and I. Lefevre 1999. Cosmic markers in an ammonite from the K/T section of Bidart (French Basque Country). 30th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, March 15–29, 1999, Houston, TX , Abstract no. 1576, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, Tx. Google Scholar
  93. C. Salazar , Stinnesbeck,W. , and L.A. QuinzioSinn 2010. Ammonites from the Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) Quiriquina Formation in central Chile. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 257: 181–236. Google Scholar
  94. A. Schafhauser , S. Götz , and W. Stinnesbeck 2007. Rudist decline in the Maastrichtian Cardenas Formation (eastcentral Mexico). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 251: 210–221. Google Scholar
  95. K. Soegaard , A.T. Daniels , H. Ye , J. Arney , N. Halik , and S. Garrick 2003. Stratigraphic evolution ofLatestCretaceous to early Tertiary Difunta foreland basin in northeast Mexico: influence of salt withdrawal on tectonically induced subsidence by the Sierra MadreOriental fold and thrust best. In : C. Bartolini , R.T. Buffler , and J.F. Blickwede (eds.), The CircumGulf of Mexico and the Caribbean; Hydrocarbon Habitats, Basin Formation, and Plate Tectonics. AAPG Memoir 79: 364–394. Google Scholar
  96. L.W. Stephenson 1941. The larger invertebrates of the Navarro Group of Texas (exclusive of corals and crustaceans and exclusive of the fauna of the Escondido Formation). University of Texas Bulletin 4101: 1–641. Google Scholar
  97. W. Stinnesbeck 1986. Zu den faunistischen und palökologischen Verhältnissen in der Quiriquina Formation (Maastrichtium) ZentralChiles. Palaeontographica A 194: 99–237. Google Scholar
  98. W. Stinnesbeck 1996. Ammonite extinctions and environmental changes across the Cretaceous—Tertiary boundary in central Chile. In : N. McLeod and G. Keller (eds.), Cretaceous—Tertiary Mass Extinctions: Biotic and Environmental Changes , 289–302. W.W. Norton & Co., New York. Google Scholar
  99. W. Stinnesbeck and G. Keller 1996. Environmental changes across the Cretaceous—Tertiary boundary in northeastern Brazil. In : N. McLeod and G. Keller (eds.), Cretaceous-Tertiary Mass Extinctions: Biotic and Environmental Changes , 451–469. W.W. Norton & Co., New York. Google Scholar
  100. F. Surlyk and J.M. Nielsen 1999. The last ammonite? Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 46: 115–119. Google Scholar
  101. F. Vega , M.C. Perrilliat , L. DuarteTorres , G. DuránHerrera , R. RivasGarcía , M. AguilarPiña , and J.F. Ventura 2007. Eocene strata from Sabinas Basin and their bearing in sedimentary basin correlation in NE Mexico. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana 59: 115–123. Google Scholar
  102. F.J. VegaVera and M.C. Perrilliat 1990. Moluscos del Maastrichtiano de la Sierra El Antrisco estado de Nuevo León. Paleontología Mexicana 55: 1–65. Google Scholar
  103. F.J. VegaVera , L.M. MitreSalazar , and E. MartínezHernández 1989. Contribución al conocimiento de la estratigrafía del Grupo Difunta (Cretácico Superior—Terciario) en el Noreste de México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, Revista 8: 179–187. Google Scholar
  104. I. Walaszczyk , W.A. Cobban , and P.J. Harries 2001. Inoceramids and inoceramid biostratigraphy of the Campanian and Maastrichtian of the United States Western Interior Basin. Revue de Paléobiologie 20: 117–234. Google Scholar
  105. P.D. Ward and W.J. Kennedy 1993. Maastrichtian ammonites from the Biscay Region. The Paleontological Society Memoir 67: 1–58. Google Scholar
  106. J. Wiedmann 1988. Ammonoid extinction and the “Cretaceous—Tertiary Boundary Event”. In : J. Wiedmann and J. Kullmann (eds.), Cephalopods — Present and Past , 117–140. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart. Google Scholar
  107. O. Wilckens 1905. Die Meeresablagerungen der Kreideund TertiärFormation in Patagonien. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie 21: 98–195. Google Scholar
  108. J.A. Wolleben 1977. Paleontology of the Difunta Group (Upper Cretaceous—Tertiary) in northeastern Mexico. Journal of Paleontology 51: 373–398. Google Scholar
  109. W.J. Zinsmeister and R.M. Feldmann 1996. Late Cretaceous faunal changes in the high southern latitudes: A harbiger of global biotic catastrophe? In : N. McLeod and G. Keller (eds.), Cretaceous—Tertiary Mass Extinctions: Biotic and EnvironmentalChanges , 303–325. W.W. Norton & Company, New York. Google Scholar
  110. W.J. Zinsmeister , R.M. Feldmann , M.O. Woodburne , and D.H. Elliot 1989. Latest Cretaceous/earliest Tertiary transition on Seymour Island, Antarctica. Journal of Paleontology 63: 731–738. Google Scholar
© 2012 W. Stinnesbeck et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Wolfgang Stinnesbeck, Christina Ifrlm and Christian Salazar "The Last Cretaceous Ammonites in Latin America," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57(4), (1 December 2012). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2011.0042
Received: 9 July 2011; Accepted: 1 December 2011; Published: 1 December 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top