Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2012 Late Cretaceous Gastropod Egg Capsules from the Netherlands Preserved by Bioimmuration
Michał Zatoń, Paul D. Taylor, John W.M. Jagt
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Clusters of gastropod egg capsules, inferred to be of neritoids and attached to the inner shell wall of the ultimate whorl of a large volutid gastropod, are here recorded from the upper Nekum Member (Maastricht Formation; late Maastrichtian) of the ENCI-Heidelberg Cement Group quarry, St Pietersberg (Maastricht, southeast Netherlands). Because the aragonitic shell of the volutid has dissolved, the outlines of the egg capsules are now revealed on the steinkern of indurated biocalcarenite, having been subsequently overgrown by cheilostome bryozoan colonies and preserved as mould bioimmurations. This represents the first example of gastropod eggs preserved through bioimmuration, as well as the first record of gastropod eggs from the Cretaceous.

Introduction

Due to their composition and small size, invertebrate eggs are uncommon in the fossil record. Under a variety of unusual taphonomic circumstances, however, they may be preserved, even in strata as ancient as Precambrian (see e.g., Xiao et al. 1998; Xiao and Knoll 1999, 2000). Most invertebrate eggs described from the fossil record, whether isolated from or in association with their producers, belong to arthropods (Briggs and Clarkson 1985; Siveter et al. 2007; Shen and Huang 2008; Huang et al. 2008). Molluscan eggs are much rarer, particularly those of gastropods, as was recently pointed out by Zatoń et al. (2009). Eggs of Paleogene and Neogene land snails (for examples, see Cox 1960; Tompa 1976; Pierce 1993), which have calcareous capsules (eggshells), have a much better fossilisation potential and far outnumber aquatic gastropod egg capsules which have so far been recorded only from Hettangian (Lower Jurassic) deltaic deposits in Poland (Zatoń et al. 2009) and Pliensbachian (Lower Jurassic) marine strata in Germany (Kaiser and Voigt 1977, 1983). Riegraf and Schubert (1991) and Schubert et al. (2008) interpreted pyritised hemispherical structures on driftwood from the Pliensbachian of Germany as putative gastropod eggs as well. Possible gastropod egg capsules preserved on bivalve shells are also known from the Miocene of the Czech Republic (Mikuláš and Dvořák 2001).

Here we record some intriguing structures from the type area of the Maastrichtian Stage that are preserved by bioimmuration. This is a process of fossilisation through organic overgrowth, generally by cemented bivalves, serpulid worms, or bryozoans with calcified basal skeletons that produce natural moulds of any organisms they overgrew during life (see Taylor 1990; Taylor and Todd 2001). Bioimmured fossils are relatively common in the Maastricht area, and numerous examples have been recorded by the late Professor Ehrhard Voigt (Voigt 1972, 1973, 1979, 1980, 1981). However, Voigt did not consider any structures resembling those described here that, on account of their arrangement, morphology and size, are interpreted as gastropod egg capsules. This is the first example of fossilised gastropod egg capsules from the Cretaceous; it also represents the first record of bioimmuration of eggs.

Institutional abbreviations.—NHMM, Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Material and methods

The egg capsules studied here are preserved on the internal mould (NHMM JJ 13778) of a large volutid gastropod identified provisionally as “Volutospina” sp. (Fig. 1). The comparatively rich gastropod faunas from the type Maastrichtian, which include several volutid taxa (see Binkhorst van den Binkhorst 1861; Kaunhowen 1898), are in urgent need of revision. NHMM JJ 13778 comes from the indurated uppermost 0.2 m of subunit IVe-7 of the Nekum Member (Maastricht Formation) at the ENCI-Heidelberg Cement Group quarry, and is of late late Maastrichtian (Belemnitella junior Zone) age (Jagt and Jagt-Yazykova 2012). At this particular level, associated gastropod taxa include turritellids, cerithiids, naticids, nerineids, and neritids, all preserved as internal/ external moulds with the exception of the neritid Otostoma retzii (Nilsson, 1827) which retains its calcitic, outer shell (see Jagt and Kiel 2008; Jagt and Severijns 2011).

The specimen of “Volutospina” sp. was examined in an uncoated state using a LEO 1455VP low vacuum scanning electron microscope (SEM) housed at the Natural History Museum, London, UK. Images were generated using backscattered electrons. Measurements of egg capsule length and width were taken from SEM photomicrographs.

Results

The traces of the inferred egg capsules have nearly circular to slightly oval outlines, with well-defined borders in the form of shallow grooves (Figs. 1, 2A, B). They occur in two areas on the gastropod internal mould, close to the suture with the preceding whorl, one area being located more anteriorly, i.e., closer to the original apertural border of the volutid, and the second area closer to the posterior end of the mould, away from the aperture (Fig. 1). In the anterior area, the eggs form a more or less united clump consisting of about 48 capsules, whereas the posterior area seems to consist of three separate clusters comprising 10, 23, and 25 eggs. Usually, the eggs are closely spaced with contiguous borders, but some eggs are isolated and others are superimposed on one another (Figs. 1B, 2A, B). When situated close to each other, the egg capsules form variably defined rows (Fig. 2A1, B1). The egg capsules are all of similar sizes, with a length of 0.95–1.2 mm (average = 1.09, SD = 0.09, N = 18) and a width of 0.85–1.15 mm (average = 0.99, SD = 0.09, N = 18).

Fig. 1.

A. The internal mould (NHMM JJ 13778) of the volutid gastropod “Volutospina” sp. from the late Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) of Maastricht, the Netherlands, with inferred egg capsules preserved by bioimmuration. Arrows drawn onto the specimen indicate the position of the preserved egg capsules. B. Close-up of the anterior area of the mould showing aggregated egg capsules. Scale bars: A 10 mm, B 5 mm.

f01_351.jpg

Key to our interpretation of the preservational mode of these eggs as bioimmurations is the fact that they are visible only in parts of the internal mould that expose the undersides of sheetlike cheilostome bryozoan colonies which encrusted the internal shell surface of the volutid. Beyond these, the internal mould consists of indurated, rather coarse-grained biocalcarenite and additional eggs are not preserved. The outlines of the polygonal cheilostome zooids are clearly seen within and around those of the eggs (Fig. 2A2), and locally the basal walls of the zooids are abraded to reveal the interiors of the zooids (see Fig. 2A1, B1). The bryozoan zooids evidently filled the interiors of the eggs, presumably after hatching, and also grew around them. However, the basal margins of the egg capsules remained intact, indenting the bryozoan zooids and forming the deep grooves that define the outlines of these bioimmured fossils.

In some places the partially sediment-filled, dome-shaped interiors of the egg capsules are preserved (Fig. 2B1, B3). Here it appears that the eggs were turgid (?unhatched) and retained their shape during overgrowth by the bryozoans.

Discussion

The structures described here on the internal mould of a Late Cretaceous gastropod are interpreted as gastropod egg capsules preserved by bioimmuration. Today, egg capsules are produced by various caenogastropods and neritimorphs. Those produced by the latter group are tough, flattened capsules that are oval or spherical in shape, composed of conchiolin as well as chitin (e.g., Adegoke et al. 1969; Bandel 1982; Kaiser and Voigt 1983; Soliman 1987; Kano and Fukumori 2010). Egg capsules may be reinforced by either aragonite or calcite crystals (e.g., Bandel 1982; Kano and Fukumori 2010), increasing the likelihood of fossilisation (see Kaiser and Voigt 1977, 1983; Zatoń et al. 2009). Neritid egg capsules are laid down on various hard substrates, including mollusc shells, and are often aggregated into groups (e.g., Adegoke et al. 1969; Soliman 1987; Kano and Fukumori 2010). The present gastropod egg capsules are circular to slightly oval in outline, aggregated in groups and preserved on a gastropod mould, indicating that the original substrate for their deposition was the inside surface of the ultimate (body) whorl of the dead gastropod shell. The arrangement of the structures resembles that of Recent neritid egg capsules (see Fig. 2C), being either closely spaced and set in rows, often abutting, or occurring as single capsules. Furthermore, the size range of the Maastrichtian structures is also quite similar to that of some Recent neritid egg capsules (see Kano and Fukumori 2010; Fig. 3 here). The shape of the Late Cretaceous egg capsule bases (circular in outline as opposed to more oval as in Fig. 2C) may have resulted from the substrate topography on which they were laid, or may be species specific because circular egg capsules of extant neritids are also known (e.g., Adegoke et al. 1969).

Fig. 2.

A, B. Late Cretaceous gastropod egg capsules from the late Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) of Maastricht, the Netherlands, preserved by bioimmuration (NHMM JJ 13778). A. Aggregate of bioimmured egg capsules, probably the capsule bases, with an eroded basal wall of a cheilostome bryozoan colony, showing the zooid interiors (arrowed) (A1). Close-up view of the egg capsules shown in the centre of A1, with clearly visible outlines of cheilostome zooids within and around the egg capsules, shown by dotted lines (A2). B. Aggregate of presumably unhatched (left) and hatched, in a form of bases (right), egg capsules (B1). The arrow points to the eroded basal wall of a bioimmuring cheilostome bryozoan colony. Close-up views of presumably hatched (B2) and unhatched (B3) egg capsules shown in B1. C. Hatched and unhatched egg capsules of the Recent neritid gastropod species Neritina iris Mousson, 1849, on the shell exterior of a live gastropod Septaria porcellana (Linné, 1758), Kagoshima Bay, Japan (photograph courtesy of Yasunori Kano). Scale bars: A1, B1 1 mm; A2, B2, B3 200 µm; C 5 mm.

f02_351.jpg

The inferred egg capsules described here are also similar in shape, size, occurrence, and arrangement to putative neritid egg capsules reported from the Lower Jurassic (see Kaiser and Voigt 1977, 1983; Zatoń et al. 2009). Their preservation, however, is completely different: the Jurassic eggs are preserved as thin organic films on bivalve moulds (see Zatoń et al. 2009 for details). Many of them occur as thickened margins of the capsule bases, which are characteristic of neritid egg capsules (see e.g., Adegoke et al. 1969; Kano and Fukumori 2010). In contrast, the Late Cretaceous egg capsules studied here are preserved as natural moulds following overgrowth by cheilostome bryozoans with calcitic skeletons, a process of bioimmuration. The presence of the bioimmured egg capsules in two areas on the gastropod mould indicates that at least two colonies of cheilostomes overgrew the deposited egg capsules. The preservation of the bioimmured capsules also indicates that they were encrusted while at least some of them were still unhatched. Such a preservation of hatched and unhatched egg capsules occurring together has been reported previously by Zatoń et al. (2009).

Fig. 3.

Plot of measurements of Late Cretaceous and selected Recent neritid egg capsules (data from Kano and Fukumori 2010).

f03_351.jpg

The original deposition of the egg capsules by neritid gastropods within the empty shell is reminiscent of other fossil examples in which egg capsules were laid down in vacant body chambers of ammonites (Kaiser and Voigt 1983), or the interiors of bivalve shells (Kaiser and Voigt 1977; Zatoń et al. 2009). These cryptic locations would have provided protection for the eggs and the newly hatched gastropods.

In conclusion, the structures from the type Maastrichtian represent the first gastropod egg capsules to be described from the Cretaceous, and they add to the range of fossils preserved through the process of bioimmuration.

Acknowledgements.

Yasunori Kano (University of Tokyo, Japan) is thanked for providing photographs of Recent neritid egg capsules. The journal referees, Mark Wilson (The College of Wooster, Ohio, USA) and Tan Koh Siang (Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore), are thanked for remarks and corrections that improved the final typescript. MZ wishes to thank the Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia, Sosnowiec, for providing the financial support for his research at the NHM (London); access to the ENCI-Heidelberg Cement Group quarry (Maastricht) during recent years is gratefully acknowledged.

References

1.

O.S. Adegoke , T.F.J. Dessauvagie , and V.L.A. Yoloye 1969. Hemisphaerammina-like egg capsules of Neritina (Gastropoda) from Nigeria. Micropaleontology 15: 102–106. Google Scholar

2.

K. Bandel 1982. Morphologie und Bildung der frühontogenetischen Gehäuse bei conchiferen Mollusken. Facies 7: 1–198. Google Scholar

3.

J.T. van. Binkhorst van den Binkhorst 1861. Monographie des gastéropodes et des céphalopodes de la craie supérieure du Limbourg, suivie d'une description de quelques espèces de crustacés du même dépôt crétacé, avec dix-huit planches dessinées et lithographiées par C. Hohe, de Bonn , vi + 83 + 44 pp. A. Muquardt, Bruxelles/Muller Frères, Maastricht. Google Scholar

4.

D.E.G. Briggs and E.N.K Clarkson 1985. The Lower Carboniferous shrimp Tealliocaris from Gullane, East Lothian, Scotland. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Earth Sciences 76: 173–201. Google Scholar

5.

L.R. Cox 1960. General characteristics of Gastropoda. In : R.C. Moore (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part I. Mollusca 1, 184I169. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence. Google Scholar

6.

D.-Y. Huang , A. Nel , O. Zompro , and A. Waller 2008. Mantophasmatodea now in the Jurassic. Naturwissenschaften 95: 947–952. Google Scholar

7.

J.W.M. Jagt and E.A. Jagt-Yazykova 2012. Stratigraphy of the type Maastrichtian—a synthesis. In : J.W.M. Jagt , S.K. Donovan , and E.A. Jagt-Yazykova (eds.), Fossils of the type Maastrichtian (Part 1). Scripta Geologica (Special Issue) 8: 5–32. Google Scholar

8.

J.W.M. Jagt and S. Kiel 2008. The operculum of Otostoma retzii (Nilsson, 1827) (Gastropoda, Neritidae; Late Cretaceous) and its phylogenetic significance. Journal of Paleontology 82: 201–205. Google Scholar

9.

J.W.M. Jagt and J. Severijns 2011. Opmerkelijke Luiks-Limburgse Krijtfossielen. Deel 16. Dekseltje gelicht. Natuurhistorisch Maandblad 100: 46–47. Google Scholar

10.

Y. Kano and H. Fukumori 2010. Predation on hardest molluscan eggs by confamilial snails (Neritidae) and its potential significance in egg-laying site selection. Journal of Molluscan Studies 76: 360–366. Google Scholar

11.

P. Kaiser and E. Voigt 1977. Über eine als Schneckenlaich gedeutete Eiablage in einer Schale von Pseudopecten aus dem Lias von Salzgitter. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 51: 5–11. Google Scholar

12.

P. Kaiser and E. Voigt 1983. Fossiler Schneckenlaich in Ammonitenwohn-kammern. Lethaia 16: 145–156. Google Scholar

13.

F. Kaunhowen 1898. Die Gastropoden der Maestrichter Kreide. Palaeontologische Abhandlungen (neue Folge) 4: 1–132. Google Scholar

14.

C. Linné 1758. Systema Naturae. 10th ed. Vol. 1. 824pp. Salvius, Stockholm. Google Scholar

15.

R. Mikuláš and Z. Dvořák 2001. Fossil biogenic structures (? invertebrate eggs) attached to mollusc shells (Miocene; Northern Bohemian Brown Coal Basin, Czech Republic). Journal of the Czech Geological Society 46: 375–378. Google Scholar

16.

A. Mousson 1849. Die Land- und Süsswasser-Mollusken von Java. 126 pp. Friedrich Schulthess, Zurich. Google Scholar

17.

S. Nilsson 1827. Petrificata Suecana formationis cretaceae, descripta et iconibus illustrate. Pars Prior. Vertebrata et Mollusca sistens. viii + 29 pp. Berlingiana, Londini Gothorum. Google Scholar

18.

H.G. Pierce 1993. On the identification of fossil terrestrial gastropod eggshells. The Nautilus 107: 79–80. Google Scholar

19.

W. Riegraf and S. Schubert 1991. Ein besonderes Fossil. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 65: 227–229. Google Scholar

20.

S. Schubert , J. Gründel , and A. Nützel 2008. Early Jurassic (Upper Pliensbachian) gastropods from the Herforder Liasmulde (Bielefeld, northwest Germany). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 82: 17–30. Google Scholar

21.

Y.-B. Shen and D.-Y. Huang 2008. Extant clam shrimp egg morphology: taxonomy and comparison with other fossil branchiopod eggs. Journal of Crustacean Biology 28: 352–360. Google Scholar

22.

D.J. Siveter , D.J. Siveter , M.D. Sutton , and D.E.G. Briggs 2007. Brood care in a Silurian ostracod. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274: 465–469. Google Scholar

23.

G.N. Soliman 1987. A scheme for classifying gastropod egg masses with special reference to those from the northwestern Red Sea. Journal of Molluscan Studies 53: 1–12. Google Scholar

24.

P.D. Taylor 1990. Preservation of soft-bodied and other organisms by bioimmuration—a review. Palaeontology 33: 1–17. Google Scholar

25.

P.D. Taylor and J.A. Todd 2001. Bioimmuration. In : D.E.G. Briggs and P.R. Crowther (eds.), Palaeobiology II , 285–289. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford. Google Scholar

26.

A. Tompa 1976. Fossil eggs of the land snail genus Vallonia (Pulmonata: Valloniidae). The Nautilus 90: 5–7. Google Scholar

27.

E. Voigt 1972. Amathia immurata n. sp., ein durch Bioimmuration erhaltenes ctenostomes Bryozoon aus der Maastrichter Tuffkreide. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 46: 87–92. Google Scholar

28.

E. Voigt 1973. Hydrallmania graptolithiformis n. sp., eine durch Biomuration erhaltene Sertulariidae (Hydroz.) aus der Maastrichter Tuffkreide. paläontologische Zeitschrift 47: 25–31. Google Scholar

29.

E. Voigt 1979. The preservation of slightly or non-calcified fossil Bryozoa• (Ctenostomata and Cheilostomata) by bioimmuration. In : G.P. Larwood and M.B. Abbott (eds.), Advances in Bryozoology , 541–564. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

30.

E. Voigt 1980. Arachnidium longicauda n. sp. (Bryozoa Ctenostomata) aus der Maastrichter Tuffkreide (Ob. Kreide, Maastricht). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 1980: 738–746. Google Scholar

31.

E. Voigt 1981. Erster fossiler Nachweis des Algen-Genus Fosliella Howe, 1920 (Corallinaceae; Rhodophyceae) in der Maastrichter und Kunrader Kreide (Maastrichtium, Oberkreide). Facies 5: 265–282. Google Scholar

32.

S. Xiao and A.H. Knoll 1999. Fossil preservation in the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo phosphorite Lagerstätte, South China. Lethaia 32: 219–240. Google Scholar

33.

S. Xiao and A.H. Knoll 2000. Phosphatized animal embryos the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation at Weng'an, Guizhou, south China. Journal of Paleontology 74: 767–788. Google Scholar

34.

S. Xiao , Y. Zhang , and A.H. Knoll 1998. Three-dimensional preservation of algae and animal embryos in a Neoproterozoic phosphorite. Nature 391: 553–558. Google Scholar

35.

M. Zatoń , G. Niedźwiedzki , and G. Pieńkowski 2009. Gastropod egg capsules preserved on bivalve shells from the Lower Jurassic (Hettangian) of Poland. Palaios 24: 568–577. Google Scholar
© 2013 M. Zatoń et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Michał Zatoń, Paul D. Taylor, and John W.M. Jagt "Late Cretaceous Gastropod Egg Capsules from the Netherlands Preserved by Bioimmuration," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 58(2), 351-355, (1 December 2012). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2011.0150
Received: 4 October 2011; Accepted: 15 December 2011; Published: 1 December 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top