Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2014 A New Isoetalean Microsporophyll from the Latest Albian of Northeastern Spain: Diversity in the Development and Dispersal Strategies of Microspores
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In this paper well-preserved isoetalean microsporophyll, containing in situ microspores, is described from the uppermost part of the Utrillas Formation (latest Albian) in Teruel Province, northeastern Spain. Similar but dispersed microspores were described previously as Peromonolites. Fossil plant impressions and compressions including the sporophyll lamina and microsporangium are referred to the fossil genus Isoetites. Although Isoetes-like megafossil remains, often with in situ or associated megaspores, are known from quite a few Cretaceous sites, and dispersed microspores are known, the presence of intact microsporangia is rare. Herein we suggest that microsporangia may have dispersed in masses, possibly representing a new unknown strategy in microspore dispersal in this group of plants.

Introduction

Modern Isoetaceae have worldwide distribution, living in temperate-warm regions of all continents, from sea level to 4200 m, most frequently above 2000 m (Tryon and Tryon 1982). They usually occur in aquatic habitats or soils that are saturated with water at least part of the year (Tryon and Lugardon 1990). These heterosporous plants are typically small herbs with simple clusters of quill-like leaves, with sporangia (bearing either megaspores or microspores in separate sporangia). Each sporangium is attached to the inner base of most mature leaves. The microspores of living Isoetes are freely dispersed when they become mature. The fossil genus Isoetites was erected by Münster (1842) to describe fossil plants that have certain characters that suggest a relationship to extant Isoetes, but which differs in stem or leaf morphology, or in which some plant part is lacking. However, compressions of sporophylls, which may be isolated or attached to cormlike stems, have been included in Isoetites (Skog et al. 1992: 151). Most of the authors indicate that there is no clear distinction recognizable between Isoetites and Isoetes. However, recently Kustatscher et al. (2010: 601) suggested that the genus Isoetes should not be used if all the characters of this extant genus are not present. Furthermore, Kustatscher et al. (2010: 601) emended the genus Isoetites to include “Herbaceous lycophyte with lanceolate to elongate leaves, expanded basally, bearing mega- and microsporangia. Stem from reduced (almost missing) to short; corm unlobed or slightly lobed. Several to many ligulate sporophylls, erect to spreading. Megasporangia on the outermost whorl of sporophylls, microsporangia on the more inner whorls. Leaves of the innermost whorls generally sterile. Megaspores globose and trilete, microspores elongated to reniform, monolete, smooth to sculptured.”

Although the genus Isoetites is known as early as the Triassic (Kustatscher et al. 2010), during the Cretaceous, isoetaleans were herbaceous plants with corm-like rhizomorphs rarely reaching 18 cm in height (Pigg 1992). Isoetalean plants represented by entire corm-like structures and aggregations of sporophylls have been observed in the Early Cretaceous Santana Formation of Brazil (Dilcher et al. 2000), Aptian deposits of Tunisia (Barale 1999), Albian of Portugal (Saporta 1894; Teixeira 1948), and in the Early (Krassilov 1982) and Late Cretaceous (Krassilov and Makulbekov 1996) of Mongolia. Other fossils corresponding to Isoetites have also been reported from the Middle Jurassic of the United States (Ash and Pigg 1991), Jurassic and Early Cretaceous rocks of India (Banerji 1989; Bose and Roy 1964), the mid-Cretaceous Dakota Group of Kansas and Nebraska (Skog et al. 1992) and Paleocene-Eocene of western North America (Brown 1939; Pigg 2001), Wealden from the upper Ashdown Formation (Batten 2011) and ex situ material which is thought to be derived from the Wealden succession of England (Skog and Hill 1992).

For the Cretaceous in situ isoetalean megaspores have been described from isolated megasporophylls from the Upper Weald Clay (Barremian) at Smokejacks Brickworks in the United Kingdom (Jarzembowski et al. 1996) and the Early (Krassilov 1982) and Late Cretaceous (Krassilov and Makulbekov 1996) of Mongolia. Corms with attached roots and sporophylls with in situ isoetalean megaspores have been found from the Middle-Late Jurassic Bhuj Formation in India (Banerji 1989) and early Aptian Douiret Formation of Merbah el Asfer in Tunisia (Barale 1999). There are several contributions in which the megaspore genera Paxillitriletes and Minerisporites in particular are discussed in the context of attribution to the Isoetales (e.g., Collinson et al. 1985; Batten 1988; Collinson 1991; Kovach and Dilcher 1988; Skog et al. 1992; Kovach 1994; Batten and Collinson 2001; Batten et al. 2011). Some works show microspores adhering to sculptural elements of dispersed Minerisporites (Collinson et al. 1985; Collinson 1991; Batten and Collinson 2001) and Paxillitriletes (Lupia 2011). Minerisporites marginatus (Dijkstra, 1951) Potonié, 1956 was previously described from the Early Cretaceous of South Australia (Cookson and Dettmann 1958), the boreholes A and B in The Netherlands (Dijkstra 1951) and the Mons Basin in Belgium (Delcourt and Sprumont 1955; Yans 2003). This species was also found in the Peace River area in Canada together with Minerisporites venustus Singh, 1964 (Singh 1971), in Człuchów (Poland) together with M. richardsoni (Murray, 1939) Harris, 1961 (Waksmundzka 1982) and from the Wealden of the United Kingdom as cfB. M. marginatus with M. alius Batten, 1969 (Batten 1969). Dispersed megaspores of Isoetites of probable late Barremian-early Aptian age have been described in Torres Vedrás locality in Portugal (Friis et al. 2010). Some dispersed megaspores belonging to the genera Paxillitriletes and Dijkstraisporites from the Barremian of Brilon-Nehden, Germany, and the Patuxent Formation (Aptian-early Albian) of Virginia, USA, seem to be related to Isoetes (Hueber 1982; Wilde and Hemsley 2000; Friis et al. 2010). Megaspore-like structures from Isoetites sp. 2 have been noted from the top Ashdown Formation (Berriasian-Valanginian) near Hastings, in the United Kingdom (Jarzembowski et al. 1996).

The precise shape and structure of the fertile parts of ancient Isoetales are still poorly known (Grauvogel-Stamm and Lugardon 2001: 136). The present work yields new data on reproductive strategy and microspore dispersal of fossil isoetalean plants, and provides the first description of Mesozoic isoetalean microsporophyll with many in situ masses containing hundreds of microspores.

Institutional abbreviations.—MPZ, Museo Paleontológico de Zaragoza, Spain.

Geographic and geological setting

The studied material comes from a clay pit near the village of Estercuel (Teruel Province, northeastern Spain), located in the southwestern Aragonese branch of the Iberian Chain (Fig. 1).

The locality is in the Oliete Sub-basin (Soria 1997). Two levels can be differentiated based on sedimentological data. The beds bearing the studied isoetalean macroflora (level ET 2-1) correspond to grey claystone beds intercalated with medium-grained yellow sandstone and deposited in a tidally influenced fluvial sedimentary environment. This level also contains a very diverse and exceptionally well-preserved macro- and microfloral assemblages, which includes other isoetalean non-fertile leaves (Sender et al. 2012). The overlying level ET 2-2 corresponds to black claystone with marine bivalves and less abundant plant remains. Both levels correspond to the “Boundary Marls” unit (the “Margas de Transición” unit of Aguilar et al. 1971). This unit reflects the transition between the underlying fluvial sandstone of the Utrillas Formation and the overlying shallow marine limestone of the Mosqueruela Formation (Fig. 1). The age of this unit in Estercuel has been established as latest Albian on the basis of the palynological assemblage (Sender et al. 2012; Villanueva-Amadoz et al. 2011).

Previous studies on this unit in the nearby area of Plou, also located in the Oliete Sub-basin, have determined shallow lacustrine facies deposited with significant oscillation of the water table and occasionally with a fluvial influence dominated by hydrophytic plants. The lacustrine depositional basin was infilled with sediment, leading to a final colonization by terrestrial sun-loving or helophytic plants (Gomez et al. 2009; Sender et al. 2010). In Estercuel sedimentological studies suggest tidally influenced fluvial and swampy environments with low marine input demonstrated by the presence of dinoflagellate cysts and mytiloid bivalves (Sender et al. 2012).

Fig. 1.

A. Geographic location of the studied fossiliferous site of the Estercuel locality, northeast Spain. B. Stratigraphic sequence (modified from Pardo 1979) (B1) and detailed log (B2) with the stratigraphical level containing studied isoetalean material marked by a black arrow (level ET 2-1).

f01_479.jpg

Material and methods

The studied fossil material (MPZ 2010/919) is preserved as impression and compression material (Figs. 24). We have assigned this material to the genus Isoetites following the emended diagnosis of Kustatscher et al. (2010) as it lacks some of the characters of the living genus Isoetes. It corresponds to a complete isolated microsporophyll bearing an attached basal sporangium (Fig. 2A, B, indicated as microsporangium in Fig. 2A) that contains in situ microspores grouped in masses (Figs. 2B4 and 3A indicated by white arrows). Seven of these masses were recovered and prepared for study under SEM (Fig. 3B, D).

Observations were made with a stereoscopic light microscope, aided by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Only SEM images were used for illustration of palynological material, because of the high magnification required to resolve micromorphology. For SEM observation the microspore masses were removed from the rock and handled with a moist brush without any chemical treatment, and placed on double-sided sticky tape on bronze stubs. The samples were coated with gold-palladium, and examined with a SEM Phillips XL 30 at the C.A.C.T.I. (University of Vigo, Spain).

Systematic palaeontology

Order Isoetales Prantl, 1874
Family Isoetaceae Reichenbach, 1828
Genus Isoetites (Münster 1842) emend. Kustatscher, Wachtler, and van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, 2010

  • Type species: Isoetites crociformis Münster, 1842 from the Late Jurassic of Solnhofen, Bavaria, Germany.

  • Isoetites sp.
    Figs. 2A, B, 3A–D, 4A–E.

  • Material.—MPZ 2010/919, from Estercuel quarry, Teruel, northeastern Spain.

  • Description

  • Microsporophyll.—The leaf impression is simple, linear, about 22.1 mm long and 4.4 mm wide (Fig. 2A, B1, B2). The margin is entire, with its base slightly expanded and the apex acute. The leaf shows a large midvein up to 2 mm wide (Fig. 2A, indicated as central vein). The lamina is trabeculated, with trabeculae at intervals of about 1 mm (Fig. 2A, B1, B2, indicated by arrows in Fig. 2B2). However, the presence of trabeculae (which would not be confused by horizontal lines appearing on the laminar surface of the sporophyll are related to air channels in extant and fossil Isoetes and related forms) inside the microsporangium is not evident possibly due to taphonomic biases (Fig. 2B4). The impression of an elliptical ligule is preserved with an acute apex (Fig. 2A, B1, B3).

    The base of the microsporophyll is spatulate proximally and oval distally (Fig. 2A, B1). It measures 9.7 mm long and 2.5 mm wide and contains the elongate microsporangium (Fig. 2A, B1, B4). There is no evidence of a velum. The microsporangium contains a mesh of circa 135 polygonal bodies (Figs. 2A, B1, B4, 3A) of variable sizes (largest axes between 300 µm and 450 µm) and different morphologies with pentagonal or hexagonal shapes.

    The masses are elliptical in shape, approximately 400–580 µm long and 290–320 µm wide, containing hundreds of microspores (Fig. 3B, D). The microspores seems to be grouped in tetrads (Fig. 3C, indicated by arrows).

  • Microspores (Figs. 3C, 4A–E).—Bilateral, plano-convex, monolete with a perinous layer and the straight laesura is well marked on almost the whole length of the proximal face, with elevated lips 2.6–4.5 µm high (Fig. 4D, E). Microspores are elliptic in polar view 20–34 µm long and 17–32 µm wide. Proximal and distal faces appear flattened due to compaction. A distinct feature of the microspore is a flange-like extension of the equatorial ridge 1.4–3.7 µm wide (Fig. 4A–E). On the proximal and distal face the perispore has a microgranulate micro-ornamentation (Fig. 4A–E). A characteristic tuberculate ornamentation occurs only on the distal face, with tubercles (0.1–2 µm high and 0.4–2 µm wide) spaced 0.2–4.9 µm apart and showing an apical more or less circular pit 0.1–1.6 µm in diameter (Figs. 3C, 4A, B). A cavate exine is 0.4 µm thick with a smooth inner layer of 0.1 µm and a tuberculate outer layer of 0.3 µm.

  • Remarks.—During the Triassic there is a change in isoetalean microspore apertures from trilete to monolete, a character related to modern-day Isoetes (Pigg 2001). Nonetheless, Pleuromeia Corda in Germar, 1852 (Glaessner and Rao 1955), Lycostrobus Nathorst, 1908 (Kempf 1971; Scott and Playford 1985) and Lepacyclothes Emmons, 1856 (formerly Annalepis Fliche, 1910 in Retallack 1997: 507) are other Triassic genera related to Isoetites, which have yielded in situ monolete microspores similar to Aratrisporites (Dettmann 1961; Retallack 1997; Grauvogel-Stamm and Lugardon 2001), showing this evolution. Aratrisporites microspores have also been found from Tenellisporites trilete megaspores (Fliche 1910; Grauvogel-Stamm and Duringer 1983). Moreover, Cretaceous genera Nathorstiana Richter, 1909, and Nathorstianella Glaessner and Rao, 1955 are also related to Isoetites (Kustatscher et al. 2010). There is a clear evolution trend from the Triassic Pleuromeia, through Cretaceous Nathorstiana and Nathorstianella, to Isoetes (Glaessner and Rao 1955). However, Nathorstiana and Nathorstianella have not yielded any reproductive structures within the fossil record to compare those microspores with the microspores presented herein.

    Similarities between Selaginella and Isoetes have been established due to the similarities in wall structure of the microspores and megaspores, suggesting an old connection of these groups (Tryon and Lugardon 1990). However, the distinctive vegetative characters and the difference in aperture of the microspores (monolete in Isoetes and trilete in Selaginella) support the association of the studied fossil material with Isoetes rather than Selaginella.

    Morphological characters of the here described in situ microspores, correspond most closely to the cavate genera Peromonolites Couper, 1953 and Aratrisporites Leschik, 1955. The original descriptions of both genera and emendation of the genus Aratrisporites (Klaus 1960: 145; Playford and Dettmann 1965: 151), are similar in terms of morphological characters. Microspores belonging to Isoetes are also morphologically similar to the fossil spores Aratrisporites (see illustrations in Harris 1955: pl. 2: 1, 2) and Peromonolites (see illustrations in Couper 1953: figs. 31, 32; 1960: pl. 2: 1). Aratrisporites has been used for Triassic and Peromonolites for Cretaceous-Cenozoic spores.

    Initially, the genus Peromonolites was delimited for the Cretaceous by Couper (1953) as anisopolar, bilateral monolete (occasionally alete) spores with laesura occasionally indicated only by a weak area in the exine, surrounded by a sculptured perispore. In the diagnosis of this genus this author did not give any indication of the differences in the ornamentation on distal and proximal faces. Moreover, he described the type species Peromonolites bowenii Couper, 1953 as having sub-verrucate ornamentation of the central body in both faces, a hyaline psilate perispore, and as being distinct by its monolete aperture with a laesura extending the whole length of proximal face.

    The first description of the genus Aratrisporites given by Leschik (1955) included zonate spinulose spores, however, this first description did not include any reference of the type of aperture, but was considered monolete by Klaus (1960). The latter emended the genus Aratrisporites stating that it was a gondola-shaped monolete spore, with granulate to spinulose sclerine, and zonate exine. Later, Playford and Dettmann (1965) emended the diagnosis of Aratrisporites and transferred it from the Subturma Zonomonoletes Luber, 1935 (Luber 1935) to Suprasubturma Perinomonolites Erdtman, 1947 (Erdtman 1947) on the grounds that it is cavate and not zonate. Playford and Dettmann (1965) also considered the genus Saturnisporites Klaus, 1960 a junior synonym of Aratrisporites (Leschik, 1955) Playford and Dettmann, 1965. They assumed that the characters of presence of elevated laesurate lips and the absence of typical anchor-shaped laesura in the polar ends, as described by Klaus (1960), were not diagnostic features for differentiating these genera. None of these authors gave any indication of differences in ornamentation of the sclerine between the proximal and distal faces in the description of the genus and type species, and it is difficult to observe in the original figures of Leschik (1955: pl. 5: 2, 4).

    In situ microspores of Aratrisporites (probably A. minimus Schulz, 1967) have been described from Triassic microsporophylls of Annalepis zeilleri Fliche, 1910 (Grauvogel- Stamm and Duringer 1983), which are considered isoetalean lycopsids (Pigg 1992). The sculpture of those microspores are specified in the text as being infragranulate to punctate, however it seems from the photographs that the proximal face is verrucate and distal face baculate (Grauvogel- Stamm and Duringer 1983: pl. 6), similar to herein described microspores. Moreover, in situ microspores of Isoetites brandneri from the Triassic of the Dolomites (northern Italy) could belong to the genus Aratrisporites (Kustatscher et al. 2010: pl. 2: 4), however, proximal and distal sculptures of those microspores are not described and they are difficult to observe from the figure. It seems that in Aratrisporites flexibilis and A. paenulatus Playford and Dettman, 1965 the proximal face is verrucate and the distal face baculate.

    According to Playford and Dettmann (1965) Peromonolites Couper, 1953 differs from Aratrisporites in having a sculptured inner wall layer. Brenner (1963) described the species Peromonolites allensis as having a smooth inner layer and an extremely wrinkled outer layer. However, this character is very difficult to observe, and hence it is not very useful for systematics. There are also some problematic species included in the genus Peromonolites such as Peromonolites archangelskii Baldoni, 1987, which lacks a cavate exine (Baldoni 1987) and Peromonolites problematicus Couper, 1953, which lacks an evident aperture and has morphological similarities to the trilete Bryosporis anisopolaris Mildenhall, 1990 (Bussell and Mildenhall 1990). For this reason, a more detailed taxonomic revision of the genera Aratrisporites and Peromonolites seems necessary, in order to better understand those morphotypes. Thus, we have used the first described genus Peromonolites Couper, 1953, which also coincides with the terminology used for Cretaceous-Cenozoic spores.

    Microspores studied herein resemble more closely Peromonolites densus Harris, 1965 characterized by a thick perispore and granulate ornamentation with granules which are more or less uniformly distributed. The presently described in situ microspores are very different from Peromonolites archangelskii Baldoni, 1987 which are not cavate spores and present a fibrous ornamentation on both faces so this species should not be included within this genus. Peromonolites asplenoides Couper, 1958 differs by a greater size (overall 70–90 µm) and thicker perispore (about 25 µm in thickness). Peromonolites bowenii Couper, 1953 differs in having a verrucate ornamentation on both faces. Peromonolites granulatus Norton, 1969 is distinct in having a baculate to granulate ornamentation and indistinct laesura. Peromonolites pehuenche Volkheimer, 1972 differs by its distinct irregularly-shaped hyaline perispore, a more circular outline of the spore and microgranulate ornamentation. Peromonolites subengelmannii (Elsik, 1968) Jameossanaie, 1987 differs in having a less distinct laesura, thicker perine and microgranulate ornamentation on both faces. Peromonolites vellosus Partridge in Stover and Partridge, 1973 is distinguishable from microspores studied herein by having a thicker perispore and fibrous, mat-like ornamentation on both faces. Peromonolites fragilis Burger, 1966, without any indication of tubercles in the original description, differs in having a minutely and densely wrinkled, scabrate-reticulate ornamentation on both faces, with the perine more loosely attached. Peromonolites allensis Brenner, 1963 is distinct by its highly wrinkled perine which is more closely attached to the central body, and a smaller camera.

    The microspores are typically tuberculate similar to the modern species Isoetes capensis Duthie, 1929 from South Africa (Tryon and Lugardon 1990: 624, fig. 232.14), which also shows a circular aperture at the end of the tubercles.

  • Fig. 2.

    Isoetalean microsporophyll with in situ masses of microspores, from the Boundary Marls unit (uppermost Albian) of Estercuel (Teruel, Spain). A. Explanatory drawing of the microsporophyll in B. Black arrows and the irregular lines indicate the impressions of trabeculae in leaf section. B. MPZ 2010/919. Microsporophyll with the sporangium at base containing masses of microspores (B1). Detail of the microsporophyll lamina with impressions of trabeculae indicated by white arrows (B2). Detail of the base of the microsporophyll leaf showing the impression of ligule (B3). Microsporangium containing masses of microspores (B4). Scale bars: A, B1, B2, 5 mm; B3, B4, 1 mm.

    f02_479.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    In situ masses of microspores of isoetalean microsporophyll (MPZ 2010/919) from Estercuel locality, latest Albian. A. Detail of the microsporangium with six masses of microspores, some of them showing a false “trilete” mark (arrows) probably due to a post-sedimentary compression process. B, D. Masses of hundreds of microspores, the false “trilete” mark due to compaction within adjacent polygonal bodies inside microsporophyll (arrow). C. Detail of microspores presumably grouped in tetrads (arrows) showing both proximal and distal faces. B–D, SEM micrographs. Scale bars: A, 5 mm; B, D, 100 µm; C, 20 µm.

    f03_479.jpg

    Discussion

    Microspore masses and their development.—The morphological variability of spores inside sporangia is related to their stage of maturity. Developmental series ranging from circular inaperturate to triangular trilete spores, have previously been noticed for the matoniaceous fern Weichselia reticulata from the Escucha Formation of north-eastern Spain (Diez et al. 2005). However, in the present study, all microspores inside the masses show similar morphologies apparently grouped in tetrads (Fig. 3C), morphologically equivalent to dispersed microspores in the same stratigraphic level (Fig. 4F, G). This is an important feature as in situ fossil isoetalean microspore tetrads have only been found in the Carboniferous cormose lycopod Chaloneria, as the trilete microspore type Endosporites (Pigg and Rothwell 1983; Pigg 1992). The similar morphology in both in situ and dispersed microspores suggests that the microspores were mature before dispersal, as they appear without separation from one another. The microspores are closely compressed forming a spherical mass and they seem to be imbricated without any indication of any organic cementation or any structure of attachment. The presence of such grouping in the studied material differs from the microspores of the living genus Isoetes that detach directly from the sporangia. In isoetalean lycopsid Lycostrobus scottii, the in situ microspores from pleuromeian cones occur in spherical groups (Pigg 1992), and it has been suggested that the grouping may have been the result of sporangial trabeculae (partitions) that were not preserved (Nathorst 1908; Taylor et al. 2009). Similarly, there is a strong possibility that this Cretaceous Isoetites may have had sporangia which were divided by trabeculae into a simple polygonal arrangement forming a reticulum. The upper leaves (microphylls or sporophylls) of the modern isoetalean lycopsids and the specimen studied herein, have a series of regularly spaced trabeculae, which are arranged transversely to the axis of the leaf. In modern isoetalean sporangia, trabeculae develop as parallel sheets that cross the sporangium. The breakdown of the parenchyma and tapetum during maturity or fossilisation would clearly lead to the production of polygonal spore masses. However, the confirmation of this hypothesis needs better preserved specimens. This configuration favors the concentration of microspores in masses, having a similar shape and size as megaspores. The situation in living Isoetes might be a vestigial trace of this system but there is no need for Isoetes to be the same as a Cretaceous form.

    Fig. 4.

    AE. SEM micrographs of isoetalean masses from Isoetites sp. (MPZ 2010/919) from the uppermost Albian of northeastern Spain. In situ microspores showing distal face (A), distal face with characteristic tuberculate ornamentation (B), and proximal face with the laesura extending the whole length of the grain and psilate ornamentation (CE). F, G. Dispersed isoetalean microspores of the genus Peromonolites from Estercuel deposits similar to herein described in situ ones.

    f04_479.jpg

    There are some evidences indicating that there is a single microsporangium with a reticulate structure and that multiple sporangia are not involved. The reticulate microsporangium shows polygonal structures of different shapes (Fig. 3A, B, D). They are predominantly polygonal bodies, being hexagonal, pentagonal and even trapezoidal. The structures have different shapes, besides, they have variable sizes (Fig. 3A, indicated by white arrows). Those two features are not consistent with the development of multiple sporangia observed in different groups of plants that present these structures (including lycophytes). The individual microsporangia of those groups have regular shapes and sizes, very similar one another (see examples in Taylor et al. 2009). If multiple sporangia were involved, as in some types of lycophytes (Taylor et al. 2009), individual microsporangia should be attached around a hypothetical axis, however, no fixing structures (stalk or pedicel) of possible microsporangia have been noticed.

    The significance of microspore masses for microspore dispersal.—Two different dispersal mechanisms have been described for isoetalean spores: (i) they appear in spore masses for Jurassic megaspores (Banerji 1989; Marcinkiewicz 1989) and Triassic microspores (Nathorst 1908), (ii) microspores appear attached to megaspore sculptural elements for Cretaceous and younger isoetaleans (Batten 1969; Musselman 2002). Monolete microspores similar to those of living Isoetes have been previously reported adherent to the surface sculpture of isoetalean megaspores: entangled in the capilli of Paxillitriletes vittatus Kovach and Dilcher, 1985 from the Cenomanian of Kansas (Kovach and Dilcher 1985), of Paxillitriletes alatus from the late Santonian of Georgia (Lupia 2011), of Paxillitriletes fairlightensis (Batten, 1969) Hall and Nicolson, 1973 and of Dijkstraisporites helios (Dijkstra, 1951) Potonié, 1956 from the Barremian of Brilon-Nehden in Germany (Wilde and Helmsley 2000). Those monolete microspores adherent to Paxillitriletes fairlightensis, P. vittatus and Dijkstraisporites helios appear similar to those compared to Perinomonoletes Krutzsch, 1967 (Kovach and Dilcher 1985; Wilde and Hemsley 2000).

    The presence of masses could represent a primitive strategy of spore dispersal and an important aspect of the early evolutionary history of this genus, as there is no any modern analogous isoetalean species showing this kind of maturation of microspores. Oval grouping of in situ megaspores have been reported from Jurassic deltaic deposits in India (Banerji 1989), however, this author does not specify any information about the disposition of in situ microspores. However, the grouping of microspores in masses may be related to dispersal mechanism. The likely mechanisms for microspore mass dispersal are zoochoric and hydrochoric dispersals.

    The benefits of this microspore grouping may be that megaspores and microspore masses could be transported far away adhered to an animal (shellfish, fish, reptile or other) or by ingestion, and easily colonize new areas by large number of microspores. Contrary, there is a mechanism of dispersion in modern isoetalean plants enabling the transport of megaspores and microspores of the same Isoetes plant together. This transport would be favoured by water currents as isoetalean plants have an aquatic, or seasonally amphibious habit. Musselman (2002) indicates a possible method for microspore dispersal of Isoetes, in which microspores become trapped within the cavities of the surface of megaspores, being transported together by subaqueous flow. Cretaceous Minerisporites with microspores attached to their bodies have been reported and illustrated previously, often in the cavities of the reticulum of the megaspore (Collinson et al. 1985; Collinson 1991; Batten and Collinson 2001). They may adhere by other means, as noted in part of the studies of microspores adhering to Molaspora (David J. Batten, personal communication 2012). For microspore masses described here, the dispersal mechanism by a subaqueous stream would be advantageous. It could represent a more effective dispersal syndrome, as spore masses may settle quicker to bottom of water than individual microspores, showing a similar hydrodynamic behaviour to megaspores, since both have very similar morphologies and sizes. Thus, the two types of spores would be transported and deposited together in the same areas and, when conditions would become favorable, fertilization may occur.

    Nowadays this type of dispersion within isoetaleans is unfavourable possibly related to ecological and/or environmental changes. It is known that in aquatic environments, water depth and current velocities affect the way of reproduction of several plant species (Haslam 1978). This new form of dispersion may be most advantageous in flooding events and subsequent habitat recolonization over other groups of plants, which would result in a better adaptation to stressful conditions. The development of spore masses may be also beneficial in tidally-influenced environments with turbulent water flows. They may, together with megaspores, settle nearest to the source than individual microspores and they would have higher change for more effective reproduction. Hence macro- and microspores may stay together affiliating the fertilization process.

    Conclusions

    This study presents the in situ microsporophyll associated with fossil isoetalean remains (leaf, microsporangia, and microspores) from the uppermost Early Cretaceous of north-eastern Spain. The microsporophyll is characterized by having trabeculae in the lamina, an expanded base with the impression of a ligule, and an elongate microsporangium. It is assigned to the genus Isoetites. This is the first description of Mesozoic isoetalean microsporophyll with many in situ masses containing hundreds of microspores. The clustering of microspore tetrads, and the fact that the spore masses are present outside the sporangium, dispersed onto the leaf lamina, is a distinct new feature that is interpreted as a different type of spore dispersal, with no modern isoetalean analogue. The in situ microspores are more closely related to Peromonolites densus showing a botanical affinity to the modern genus Isoetes. The fact that all microspores, apparently still in tetrads, of Peromonolites present the same stage of maturity within the spore mass, similar to those of dispersed spores, indicate that spores develop before being released in masses from the megasporangium.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors thank the General Management of Cultural Heritage of the Aragón Government for fieldwork permissions and field grants. The authors also wish to express their gratitude to Xuxo Méndez from the C.A.C.T.I. (University of Vigo, Spain) for his technical assistance with the SEM. We are also grateful to Sergio R.S. Cevallos (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico), Christopher Berry (Cardiff University, United Kingdom), David J. Batten (University of Manchester, United Kingdom), Evelyn Kustatscher (Naturmuseum Südtirol, Bozen, Italy), and anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by projects CGL2008-00809/BTE and CGL2011-27869/BTE of the “Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación” of the Spanish Government.

    References

    1.

    M.J. Aguilar , J. Ramírez del Pozo , and O. Riba 1971. Algunas precisiones sobre la sedimentación y paleoecología del Cretácico Inferior en la zona de Utrillas-Villarroya de los Pinares, Teruel. Estudios Geológicos 27: 497–512. Google Scholar

    2.

    S.R. Ash and K.B. Pigg 1991. A new Jurassic Isoetites (Isoetales) from the Wallowa Terrane in Hells Canyon, Oregon and Idaho. American Journal of Botany 78: 1636–1642. Google Scholar

    3.

    A.M. Baldoni 1987. Estudios palinológicos de la zona de Collón Curá, Provincia del Neuquén, sobre elementos del Terciario Inferior y redepositados del Cretácico Inferior. Revista Española de Micropaleontología 19: 367–411. Google Scholar

    4.

    J. Banerji 1989. Some Mesozoic plant remains from Bhuj Formation with remarks on the depositional environment of beds. The Palaeobotanist 37: 159–168. Google Scholar

    5.

    G. Barale 1999. Sur la présence d'une nouvelle espèce d'Isoetites dans la flore du Crétacé inférieur de la région de Tataouine (Sud tunisien): implications paléoclimatiques et phylogénétiques. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 189–196. Google Scholar

    6.

    D.J. Batten 1969. Some British Wealden megaspores and their facies distribution. Palaeontology 12: 333–350. Google Scholar

    7.

    D.J. Batten 1988. Revision of S.J. Dijkstra's Late Cretaceous megaspores and other plant microfossils from Limburg, the Netherlands. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 41: 1–55. Google Scholar

    8.

    D.J. Batten 2011. English Wealden Fossils. 769 pp. Palaeontological Association, Field Guides to Fossils 14, Wiley-Blackwell, London. Google Scholar

    9.

    D.J. Batten and M.E. Collinson 2001. Revision of species of Minerisporites, Azolla and associated plant microfossils from deposits of the Upper Palaeocene and Palaeocene/Eocene transition in the Netherlands, Belgium and the USA. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 115: 1–32. Google Scholar

    10.

    D.J. Batten , M.E. Collinson , and A.P.R. Brain 2011. Megaspores and microspores of the extant and Paleogene marsileaceous fern Regnellidium and Cretaceous Molaspora: evolutionary and phytogeographic implications. International Journal of Plant Sciences 172: 1087–1100. Google Scholar

    11.

    M.N. Bose and S.K. Roy 1964. Studies on the Upper Gondwana of Kutch. 2. Isoetaceae. The Palaeobotanist 12: 226–228. Google Scholar

    12.

    G.J. Brenner 1963. The spores and pollen of the Potomac Group of Maryland. Maryland Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources Bulletin 27: 1–215. Google Scholar

    13.

    R. Brown 1939. Some American fossil plants belonging to the Isoetales. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 29: 261–269. Google Scholar

    14.

    D. Burger 1966. Palynology of uppermost Jurassic and lowermost Cretaceous strata in the eastern Netherlands. Leidse Geologische Mededelingen 35: 209–276. Google Scholar

    15.

    M.R. Bussell and D.C. Mildenhall 1990. Extinct palynomorphs from middle and late Pleistocene terrestrial sediments, South Wanganui Basin, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 33: 439–447. Google Scholar

    16.

    M.E. Collinson 1991. Diversification of modern heterosporous heterosporous pteridophytes. In : S. Blackmore and S.H. Barnes (eds.), Pollen and Spores: Patterns of Diversification, Systematics Association Special vol. 44, 119–150. Clarendon, Oxford. Google Scholar

    17.

    M.E. Collinson , D.J. Batten , A.C. Scott , and S.N. Ayonghe 1985. Palaeozoic, Mesozoic and contemporaneous megaspores from the Tertiary of southern England: indicators of sedimentary provenance and ancient vegetation. Journal of the Geological Society of London 142: 375–395. Google Scholar

    18.

    I.C. Cookson and M.E. Dettmann 1958. Some trilete spores from Upper Mesozoic deposits in the eastern australian region. Royal Society of Victoria Proceedings 70: 95–131. Google Scholar

    19.

    R.A. Couper 1953. Upper Mesozoic and Cainozoic spores and pollen grains from New Zealand. Geological Survey of New Zealand, Paleontological Bulletin 22: 1–77. Google Scholar

    20.

    R.A. Couper 1958. British Mesozoic microspores and pollen grains. A systematic and stratigraphic study. Palaeontographica, Abteilung B 103: 75–179. Google Scholar

    21.

    R.A. Couper 1960. New Zealand Mesozoic and Cainozoic plant microfossils. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin 32: 1–87. Google Scholar

    22.

    A. Delcourt and G. Sprumont 1955. Les spores et grains de pollen du Wealdien du Hainaut. Mémoire de la Société belge de Géologie, de Paléontologie et d' Hydrologie, nouvelle séries 4 (5): 1–73. Google Scholar

    23.

    M.E. Dettmann 1961. Lower Mesozoic Megaspores from Tasmania and South Australia. Micropaleontology 7: 71–86. Google Scholar

    24.

    J.B. Diez , L.M. Sender , U. Villanueva-Amadoz , J.J. Ferrer , and C. Rubio 2005. New data regarding Weichselia reticulata: Soral clusters and the spore developmental process. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 135: 99–107. Google Scholar

    25.

    S.D. Dijkstra 1951. Wealden megaspores and their stratigraphical value. Ibidem 5: 7–21. Google Scholar

    26.

    D.L. Dilcher , A.F. Mandarim-de-Lacerda , A.M.F. Barreto , and M.E.C. Bernardes- de-Oliveira 2000. Selected fossils from the Santana Formation, Chapada do Araripe, Brazil. American Journal of Botany 87: 70. Google Scholar

    27.

    A.V. Duthie 1929. The method of spore dispersal of three South African species of Isoetes. Annals of Botany 43: 411–412. Google Scholar

    28.

    E. Emmons 1856. Geological report of the Midland Counties, North Carolina. 352 pp. Putnam, New York. Google Scholar

    29.

    G. Erdtman 1947. Suggestions for the classification of fossil and recent pollen grains and spores. Svensk botanisk tidskrift 41: 104–114. Google Scholar

    30.

    P. Fliche 1910. Flore fossile du Trias en Lorraine et Franche-Comté. 297 pp. Berger-Levrault, Paris. Google Scholar

    31.

    E.M. Friis , K.R. Pedersen , and P.R. Crane 2010. Cretaceous diversification of angiosperms in the western part of the Iberian Peninsula. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 162: 341–361. Google Scholar

    32.

    E.F. Germar 1852. Sigillaria sternbergi Münster aus dem bunten Sandstein. Deutsche Geologische Gessellschaft Zeitschrift 4: 183–189. Google Scholar

    33.

    M.F. Glaessner and V.R. Rao 1955. Lower Cretaceous plant remains from the vicinity of Mount Babbage, South Australia. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of South Australia 78: 134–140. Google Scholar

    34.

    B. Gomez , C. Coiffard , L.M. Sender , C. Martín-Closas , U. Villanueva- Amadoz , and J.J. Ferrer 2009. Klitzschophyllites, aquatic basal eudicots (Ranunculales?) from the upper Albian (Lower Cretaceous) of north-eastern Spain. International Journal of Plant Science 170: 1075–1085. Google Scholar

    35.

    L. Grauvogel-Stamm and P. Duringer 1983. Annalepis zeilleri Fliche 1910 emend., un organe reproducteur de Lycophyte de la Lettenkohle de l'Est de la France. Morphologie, spores in situ et paléoécologie. Geologische Rundschau 72: 23–51. Google Scholar

    36.

    L. Grauvogel-Stamm and B. Lugardon 2001. The Triassic lycopsids Pleuro meia and Annalepis: Relationships, evolution, and origin. American Fern Journal 91: 115–149. Google Scholar

    37.

    J.W. Hall and D.H. Nicolson 1973. Paxillitriletes, a new name for fossil megaspores hitherto invalidly named Thomsonia. Taxon 22: 319–320. Google Scholar

    38.

    T.M. Harris 1961. The Yorkshire Jurassic flora I. Thallophyta-Pteridophyta. 212 pp. London British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar

    39.

    W.K. Harris 1955. A manual of the spores of New Zealand Pteridophyta. Bulletin of the New Zealand Department of scientific and industrial Research 116: 1–186. Google Scholar

    40.

    W.K. Harris 1965. Basal Tertiary microfloras from the Princetown area, Victoria, Australia. Palaeontographica, Abteilung B 115: 75–106. Google Scholar

    41.

    S.M. Haslam 1978. River Plants. 396 pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

    42.

    F.M. Hueber 1982. Megaspores and palynomorph from the Lower Potomac Group in Virginia. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 49: 1–69. Google Scholar

    43.

    A. Jameossanaie 1987. Palynology and age of South Hospah coal-bearing deposits, McKinley County, New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau Mines Mineras Resources, Bulletin 112: 1–64. Google Scholar

    44.

    E.A.B. Jarzembowski , P. Austen , J. Austen ., and C. Hill 1996. Quillworts from the Wealden of the Weald. Abstracts of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Palaeontological Association, Birmingham, 27. Lapworth Museum, University of Birmingham, Birmingham. Google Scholar

    45.

    E.K. Kempf 1971. Electron microscopy of Mesozoic megaspores from Denmark. Grana 11: 151–163. Google Scholar

    46.

    W. Klaus 1960. Sporen der karnischen Stufe der ostalpinen Trias. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt 5: 107–183. Google Scholar

    47.

    W.L. Kovach 1994. A review of Mesozoic megaspore ultrastructure. In : M.H. Kurmann and J.A. Doyle (eds.), Ultrastructure of Fossil Spores and Pollen, 23–37. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Google Scholar

    48.

    W.L. Kovach and D.L. Dilcher 1985. Morphology, ultrastructure and paleoecology of Paxillitriletes vittatus sp. nov. from the mid-Cretaceous (Cenomanian) of Kansas. Palynology 9: 85–94. Google Scholar

    49.

    W.L. Kovach and D.L. Dilcher 1988. Megaspores and other dispersed plant remains from the Dakota Formation (Cenomanian) of Kansas, U.S.A. Palynology 12: 89–119. Google Scholar

    50.

    V.A. Krassilov 1982. Early Cretaceous flora of Mongolia. Palaeontographica, Abteilung. B 181: 1–43. Google Scholar

    51.

    V.A. Krassilov and N.M. Makulbekov 1996. Isoetalean megasporophylls with megaspores from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 94: 231–238. Google Scholar

    52.

    W. Krutzsch 1967. Atlas der mittel- und jungtertiären dispersen Sporenund Pollen- sowie der Mikroplanktonformen des nördlichen Mitteleuropa. 232 pp. Lieferung IV und V. Gustav Fischer, Jena. Google Scholar

    53.

    E. Kustatscher , M. Wachtler , and J.H.A. Van Konijnenburg-Van Cittert 2010. Lycophytes from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) locality Kühwiesenkopf (Monte Prà della Vacca) in the Dolomites (northern Italy). Palaeontology 53: 595–626. Google Scholar

    54.

    G. Leschik 1955. Die Keuperflora von Neuewelt bei Basel, II. Die Isound Mikrosporen. Schweizerische Paläontologische Abhandlungen 72: 1–10. Google Scholar

    55.

    A.A. Luber 1935. Petrographic studies of Carboniferous, Cretaceous and Tertiary coals of Spitzbergen. Chem. Solid Fuels 6: 186–195. Google Scholar

    56.

    R. Lupia 2011. Late Santonian megaspore floras from the Gulf Coastal Plain (Georgia, USA). Journal of Paleontology 85: 1–21. Google Scholar

    57.

    T. Marcinkiewicz 1989. Remarks on agglomerations of megaspores Minerisporites institus Marc. Acta Palaeobotanica 29: 221–224. Google Scholar

    58.

    G. Graf von Münster 1842. Beiträge zur Petrefactenkunde. 131 pp. Buchner'sche Buchhandlung, Bayreuth. Google Scholar

    59.

    N. Murray 1939. The microflora of the Upper and Lower Estuarine Series of the East Midlands. Geological Magazine 76: 478–489. Google Scholar

    60.

    L.J. Musselman 2002. Ornamentation of Isoetes (Isoetaceae, Lycophyta) microspores. Botanical Review 68: 474–487. Google Scholar

    61.

    A.G. Nathorst 1908. Paläobotanische Mitteilungen, 3. Lycostrobus scotti, eine grosse Sporophyllähre aus den rätischen Ablagerungen Schonens. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 43: 1–9. Google Scholar

    62.

    N.J. Norton and J.W. Hall 1969. Palynology of the Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary in the type locality of the Hell Creek Formation, Montana, U.S.A. Palaeontographica, Abteilung B 125: 1–64. Google Scholar

    63.

    G. Pardo 1979. Estratigrafía y sedimentología de las formaciones detríticas del Cretácico inferior terminal en el Bajo Aragón turolense. 470 pp. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Zaragoza, Spain. Google Scholar

    64.

    K.B. Pigg 1992. Evolution of isoetalean lycopsids. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 589–612. Google Scholar

    65.

    K.B. Pigg 2001. Isoetalean lycopsid evolution: from the Devonian to the Present. American Fern Journal 91: 99–114. Google Scholar

    66.

    K.B. Pigg and G.W. Rothwell 1983. Chaloneria gen. nov.; heterosporous lycophytes from the Pennsylvanian of North America. Botanical Gazette 144: 132–147. Google Scholar

    67.

    G. Playford and M.E. Dettmann 1965. Rhaeto-Liassic plant microfossils from the Leig Creek Coal Measures, South Australia. Senckenbergiana lethaea 46: 127–181. Google Scholar

    68.

    R. Potonié 1956. Sporites. Part I. Synopsis der Gattungen der Sporae dispersae. Geologisches Jahrbuch Beihefte 23: 1–103. Google Scholar

    69.

    K. Prantl 1874. Lehrbuch der Botanik. 240 pp. Engelmann, Leipzig. Google Scholar

    70.

    H.G.L. Reichenbach 1828. Conspectus regni vegetabilis per gradus naturales evoluti. 294 pp. Carolum Cnobloch, Lipsiae. Google Scholar

    71.

    G.J. Retallack 1997. Earliest Triassic origin of Isoetes and quillwort evolutionary radiation. Journal of Paleontology 71: 500–521. Google Scholar

    72.

    P.B. Richter 1909. Beiträge zur Flora der unteren Kreide Quedlinburgs, II. Die Gattung Nathorstiana und Cylindrites spongioides. 12 pp. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. Google Scholar

    73.

    G. Saporta , Marquis de 1894. Flore fossile du Portugal. Nouvel1es contributions à la flore mésozoïque. 288 pp. Académie Royale des Sciences, Lisbonne. Google Scholar

    74.

    A.C. Scott and G. Playford 1985. Early Triassic megaspores from the Rewan Group, Bowen Basin, Queensland. Alcheringa 9: 297–323. Google Scholar

    75.

    E. Schulz 1967. Sporenpaläontologische Untersuchungen rätoliassischer Schichten im Zentralteil des Germanischen Beckens. Palaeontographica Abteilung B 2 (3): 541–633. Google Scholar

    76.

    L.M. Sender , B. Gomez , J.B. Diez , C. Coiffard , C. Martín-Closas , U. Villanueva-Amadoz , and J.J. Ferrer 2010. Ploufolia cerciforme gen. et comb. nov.: aquatic angiosperm leaves from the upper Albian of north- eastern Spain. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 161: 77–86. Google Scholar

    77.

    L.M. Sender , U. Villanueva-Amadoz , J.B. Diez , R. Sánchez-Pellicer , A. Bercovici , D. Pons , and J. Ferrer 2012. A new uppermost Albian flora from the Teruel province, northeastern Spain. Geodiversitas 34: 373–397. Google Scholar

    78.

    C. Singh 1964. Microflora of the Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group, East-Central Alberta. Research Council of Alberta Bulletin 15: 1–238. Google Scholar

    79.

    C. Singh 1971. Lower Cretaceous Microfloras of the Peace River Area, Northwestern Alberta. Research Council of Alberta, Bulletin 28: 1–299. Google Scholar

    80.

    J.E Skog and C.R. Hill 1992. Mesozoic lycopods. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 648–675. Google Scholar

    81.

    J.E. Skog , D.L. Dilcher , and F.W. Potter 1992. A new species of Isoëtites from the mid-Cretaceous Dakota Group of Kansas and Nebraska. American Fern Journal 82: 151–161. Google Scholar

    82.

    A.R. Soria 1997. La sedimentación en las cuencas marginales del Surco Ibérico durante el Cretácico Inferior y su control estructural. 363 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Zaragoza, Spain. Google Scholar

    83.

    L.E. Stover and A.D. Partridge 1973. Tertiary and late Cretaceous spores and pollen from the Gippsland Basin, Southeastern Australia. Royal Society of Victoria, Proceedings 85: 237–286. Google Scholar

    84.

    T.N. Taylor , E.L. Taylor , and M. Krings 2009. Paleobotany. The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants. 1230 pp. Elsevier/Academic Press Inc., Burlington. Google Scholar

    85.

    C. Teixeira 1948. Flora Mesozóica Portuguesa, I parte. 121 pp. Serviços geológicos de Portugal, Lisboa. Google Scholar

    86.

    A.F. Tryon and B. Lugardon 1990. Spores of the Pteridophyta: Structure, Wall Structure and Diversity Based on Electron Microscope Studies. 648 pp. Springer Verlag, New York. Google Scholar

    87.

    R.M. Tryon and A.F. Tryon 1982. Ferns and Allied Plants with Special Reference to Tropical America. 857 pp. Springer Verlag, New York. Google Scholar

    88.

    U. Villanueva-Amadoz , L.M. Sender , J.B. Diez , J.J. Ferrer , and D. Pons 2011. Palynological studies of the Boundary Marls Unit (Albian-Cenomanian) from the northeastern Spain. Paleophytogeographical implications. Geodiversitas 33: 137–176. Google Scholar

    89.

    W. Volkheimer 1972. Estudio palinológico de un carbón caloviano de Neuquén y consideraciones sobre los paleoclimas jurásicos de la Argentina. Revista del Museo de La Plata (NS) Paleontología 6: 101–157. Google Scholar

    90.

    M. Waksmundzka 1982. Lower Cretaceous megaspores from northern Poland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 27: 147–160. Google Scholar

    91.

    V. Wilde and A.R. Helmsley 2000. Morphology, ultrastructure and affinity of Barremian (Lower Cretaceous) megaspores Dijkstraisporites and Paxillitriletes from Brilon-Nehden, Germany. Palynology 24: 217–230. Google Scholar

    92.

    J. Yans 2003. Chronologie des sédiments kaoliniques à faciès Wealdien (Barrémien moyen et Albien supérieur; Bassin de Mons) et de la saprolite polyphasée (Crétacé inférieur et Miocène inférieur) de la Haute-Lesse (Belgique). Implications géodynamiques et paléoclimatiques. 679 pp. Unpublished PhD thesis, Faculté Polytechnique de Mons, Université de Paris XI Orsay, Mons (Belgium) and Paris (France).  Google Scholar
    © 2014 U. Villanueva-Amadoz et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    Uxue Villanueva-Amadoz, Luis Miguel Sender, José Bienvenido Diez, José Javier Ferrer, and Denise Pons "A New Isoetalean Microsporophyll from the Latest Albian of Northeastern Spain: Diversity in the Development and Dispersal Strategies of Microspores," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 59(2), 479-490, (1 June 2014). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2012.0010
    Received: 17 January 2012; Accepted: 12 September 2012; Published: 1 June 2014
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    12 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top