Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
5 April 2013 Morphology and Palaeoecology of a New Edrioblastoid from the Furongian of China
Xue-Jian Zhu, Samuel Zamora, Bertrand Lefebvre
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A new edrioblastoid Cambroblastus guolensis is described from the Furongian (late Cambrian) Sandu Formation (South China). This represents the second occurrence of a Cambrian edrioblastoid, and the first ever reported from Asia, extending the palaeogeographic range of this very rare echinoderm grade. Surprisingly it preserves a complete stem and a distal holdfast suggesting edrioblastoids were hard substrate attachers living in soft bottom quiet environments.

Introduction

Edrioblastoids are an extremely rare grade of Lower Palaeozoic echinoderms known only from a limited number of species ranging from the late Cambrian to the Late Ordovician. They displayed a globular theca with five recumbent ambulacra constructed with large, biserial and exposed flooring plates and large, simple or complex cover plates. All known species have a polyplated stem to elevate the theca above the substrate, but their attachment mechanism is still unknown (Mintz 1970; Smith and Jell 1990; Guensburg and Sprinkle 1994; Guensburg et al. 2010).

The first edrioblastoid described in the literature was Astrocystites ottawaensis Whiteaves, 1897 from the Late Ordovician of North America. However, because of its unusual morphology, Astrocystites was successively interpreted as a primitive cystoid (Whiteaves 1897), an edrioasteroid (Bather 1900, 1914; Piveteau 1953), a blastoid (Hudson 1925), an intermediate form between eocrinoids and blastoids (Hudson 1927), or as a member of a separate class (Edrioblastoidea) closely related either to blastoids (Fay 1962, 1967), eocrinoids (Mintz 1970), or echinozoans (Sprinkle 1973). All recent cladistic analyses indicate that edrioblastoids are a derived group of edrioasterid edrioasteroids closely related to cyathocystids (Smith and Jell 1990; Guensburg and Sprinkle 1994; Sumrall et al. 2013).

Since the original description of A. ottawaensis, only few other occurrences of edrioblastoids have been reported. They include Cambroblastus enubilatus Smith and Jell, 1990 from the late Cambrian of Australia, and Lampteroblastus hintzei Guensburg and Sprinkle, 1994 from the early Floian (Early Ordovician) of Utah. Late Ordovician occurrences include Astrocystites distans from Australia, based on poorly preserved specimens (Webby 1968; Webby et al. 2000), as well as possible isolated remains from Virginia (Sprinkle 1973) and Sweden (Paul 1976).

Here, a new species of Cambroblastus is described from the Furongian of China. This record extends the palaeogeographic distribution of the first edrioblastoids. The aims of this brief report are to analyze and describe the morphology of Cambroblastus sp. nov., and for the first time, to provide evidences for attachment strategies in late Cambrian edrioblastoids.

Institutional abbreviations.-NIGPAS, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

Geological setting and palaeoenvironment

The specimen was collected from mudstone and marl beds of the Sandu Formation, Guole Town, Jingxi County, Guangxi Province, southwest China (Fig. 1). Guole Town lies in Yangtze Area of South China Region. The Yangtze Area represented a shallow shelf during Cambrian time (Zhou and Zhen 2008). In addition to Cambroblastus sp. nov., the Sandu Formation has yielded a diverse associated fauna comprising aglaspididids, brachiopods (e.g., Billingsella, Guoleella, Palaeostrophia, Plectotrophia), other echinoderms (e.g., “Phyllocystisjingxiensis), graptolites (e.g., Callograptus, Dyctionema), hyolithids, trilobites (e.g., Akoldinioidia, Dictyella, Guangxiaspis, Shergoldia, Sinosaukia, Tamdaspis), and undescribed palaeoscolecids (Han and Chen 2008; Zhan et al. 2010; Lerosey-Aubril et al. 2013). Co-occurring trilobites indicate an age equivalent to the Probinacunaspis nasalis—Peichiashania hunanensis Zone of northwestern Hunan, and thus part of the Furongian, Stage 9 (Zhu et al. 2007, 2010). Abundant articulated trilobites strongly suggest rapid burial, likely as the result of an obrution event (Zhu et al. 2010). These taphonomic conditions probably also explain the exquisite preservation of echinoderms.

Systematic palaeontology

Phylum Echinodermata Bruguière, 1791
(ex Klein, 1734)
Class Edrioasteroidea Billings, 1858
Order Edrioblastoida Fay, 1962
Genus Cambroblastus Smith and Jell, 1990

  • Type species: Cambroblastus enubilatus Smith and Jell, 1990; Chatsworth Limestone, Furongian; Queensland, Australia.

  • Emended diagnosis.—An edrioblastoid with irregular, polyplated stem, distal polyplated and expanded holdfast, 3–4 irregular circlets of strongly ornamented thecal plates, ambulacra composed of large, exposed flooring plates and complex cover plates.

  • Discussion.—Cambroblastus enubilatus was originally described based on poorly preserved material from the Furongian of Australia, which prevented the detailed observation of several aspects of its morphology (Smith and Jell 1990). The specimen described herein from the Furongian of South China shows many similarities with C. enubilatus, and is thus assigned to the same genus: same plating patterns for the stem and theca, comparable morphology and extent of ambulacra, similar arrangement and size of ambulacral elements (flooring plates and primary cover plates). Moreover, the exquisite preservation of the Chinese material of Cambroblastus makes it possible to modify the original diagnosis of the genus, so as to accommodate additional information both on the structure of ambulacra and the morphology of the holdfast. For example, Smith and Jell (1990) suggested that ambulacra were roofed by only two series (left and right) of large, alternating cover plates. The better preserved Chinese material allows the identification, perradially, of two additional series of smaller (secondary) cover plates.

    The improved knowledge of the morphology of Cambroblastus makes it possible to compare it with unprecedented details with the two other known genera of edrioblastoids: Astrocystites and Lampteroblastus. Cambroblastus differs from Astrocystites in both ambulacral construction and stem morphology. In Cambroblastus, ambulacra are made of a reduced number of large, distinct flooring plates roofed by multiple series of cover plates, whereas in Astrocystites, ambulacra comprise numerous, tightly sutured flooring plates and one single biseries of elongate primary cover plates. In Cambroblastus, stem meres are almost as high as wide, whereas they are more elongate and much wider than high in Astrocystites. Main differences between Cambroblastus and Lampteroblastus concern the shape and ornamentation of the theca, the extent and structure of ambulacra, and the stem morphology. In Cambroblastus, the theca is globular, and composed of numerous plates ornamented with multiple delicate ridges. In Lampteroblastus, the theca is more cylindrical, and composed of a reduced number of plates, each ornamented with strong primary ridges. The ambulacra are significantly more extensive in Cambroblastus than in Lampteroblastus, and they comprise four series of cover plates (instead of two in Lampteroblastus). Finally, the stem is short and tapering in Lampteroblastus, whereas it is long and cylindrical, with a distal expanded holdfast in Cambroblastus.

    The presence of multiple cover plates series in Cambroblastus is probably a plesiomorphic feature shared with other primitive edrioasteroids (e.g., Cambraster, Edriodiscus, Kailidiscus, Stromatocystites).

  • Fig. 1.

    Location (A) and geological setting (B) of the studied site (modified from Zhou et al. 2008).

    f01_921.jpg

    Cambroblastus guolensis sp. nov.
    Figs. 2, 3.

  • Etymology: Referring to the town of Guole (China), where the holotype was collected.

  • Holotype: NIGPAS156159, a single specimen with both part and counterpart preserved as natural mould in a yellow brownish mudstone. All parts are well preserved with the exception of the summit and anal pyramid.

  • Type locality: Daba Village, Guole Town, Jingxi County, Guangxi Province, southwest China.

  • Type horizon: Sandu Formation, Furongian, late Cambrian.

  • Material.— Holotype only.

  • Diagnosis.—A species of Cambroblastus with widely exposed flooring plates, and a distal holdfast composed of numerous elements, smaller than those of the stem.

  • Description.—Theca of holotype slightly flattened, about 11 mm high and 10 mm large (at widest diameter). Theca bulbshaped, with large oral area and very wide ambulacra. About 80 polygonal thecal plates exposed on both part and counterpart. Thecal plates large (1 to 1.5 mm in diameter), with central elevated area, ornamented with a series of prominent ridges connecting adjacent plates. Ridges about 4 to 5 per plate side, relatively straight across plate sutures, more irregular towards central elevated areas of thecal plates. Hexagonal “deltoid” plates in interambulacral position, in contact and along adjoin- ing ambulacra. Deltoids with straight adoral region and wider distally. At stem insertion, aboral part of theca comprising at least five modified plates, each with aborally invaginated borders and a facet for insertion of stem plates.

    Five wide ambulacra made of two series of large, exposed flooring plates and multiple sets of large cover plates. Flooring plates hexagonal, transversally elongate proximally, more massive and progressively decreasing in size distally. Perradial suture between opposite series of flooring plates forming a zigzag pattern. Two series of primary cover plates, abradially in contact with underlying flooring plates. Each primary cover plate articulated to one flooring plate. Primary cover plate and associated flooring plate approximately of same size. Longitudinal rib of unknown function on internal side of each (primary?) cover plate. Adradially, two series of small, secondary cover plates alternating with primary cover plates. Secondary cover plates about twice smaller than primary ones. Perradial contact between opposite series of secondary cover plates forming a zigzag pattern. Both cover and flooring plates coarsely ornamented.

    Transition between theca and stem relatively sharp, with large, polygonal, aboral thecal plates directly in contact with small, proximal-most stem elements. Stem relatively elongate, cylindrical, with expanded holdfast for attachment at distal extremity. Stem and holdfast both made of numerous, small, similar, polygonal, undifferentiated plates, about as wide as long. Stem elements showing no clear organisation proximally, but longitudinally aligned into vertical rows distally. Adjacent stem elements showing no clear transverse pattern (e.g., rows). New (smaller) stem plates added mainly in proximal region, apparently anywhere along sutures between larger elements. Holdfast circular in shape, wide (5.5 mm), cemented to trilobite fragment in holotype. Holdfast elements rapidly decreasing in size distally, and forming a tesselate, unorganised pavement.

    Epispires (and other respiratory structures) absent. Periproct, gonopore, and hydropore not observed. Precise arrangement of oral plates also poorly documented on single available specimen.

  • Discussion.—A proper comparison of Cambroblastus guolensis with C. enubilatus is difficult, because of their different types of preservation. The Australian material is silicified and preserved in three dimensions in limestone, whereas the Chinese specimen is mouldic, flattened, slightly collapsed, and preserved in shale. Consequently, the original shape of the theca is better captured in the Australian material, but finer details (e.g., precise plate pattern, ornamentation) are obscured by the silicification. In contrast, in spite of a strong flattening, the exquisite preservation of the Chinese specimen makes it possible to document most aspects of its anatomy, including very minute features, such as the reticulate stereom microstructure. As far as can be compared, C. guolensis appears very similar to C. enubilatus, thus justifying its assignment to the same genus. However, C. guolensis shows at least two differences with C. enubilatus: flooring plates are abradially largely exposed in C. guolensis, whereas they are almost hidden in C. enubilatus; and holdfast elements are smaller than those of the stem in C. guolensis, whereas they are much larger than stem plates in C. enubilatus.

  • Fig. 2.

    Holotype of edrioblastoid edrioasteroid Cambroblastus guolensis sp. nov. (NIGPAS156159) from the Furongian (late Cambrian) of China. A, C. General view of the specimen attached to a trilobite pygidium, showing the division of the body into theca, stem, and expanded distal holdfast. B. Detail of the upper part of theca showing three ambulacra. Note the disposition of large exposed flooring plates and multiple cover plates. D. Detail of the distal stem and polyplated holdfast. All photographs are from latex casts whitened with NH4Cl sublimated. Abbreviations: fp, flooring plates; 1cp, primary cover plates; 2cp, secondary cover plates.

    f02_921.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Camera lucida drawings of ambulacra and distal stem and holdfast. A, B. Ambulacral construction of Cambroblastus guolensis sp. nov. showing flooring plates, primary cover plates, and smaller secondary cover plates. C. Distal part of the polyplated stem that ends in a distal expanded holdfast composed of minute elements cemented to a trilobite fragment.

    f03_921.jpg

    Attachment strategies in Cambrian Edrioblastoids

    All edrioasteroids were sessile, epibenthic organisms permanently attached by the aboral, imperforate extraxial part of their body (Bell 1976; Sumrall and Zamora 2011). In various edrioasteroid grades, the flexible aboral region was modified into a stem, so as to elevate the theca above the substrate (e.g., cyathocystids, pyrgocystids, rhenopyrgids). Rhenopyrgids probably evolved in deep, outer shelf, environments, where they attached directly on the sea floor, introducing their coraceous sac into the sediment (Smith and Jell 1990). In contrast, cyathocystids were cemented on hard substrates (Bell 1982). The stem-like structures of all edrioblastoids are remarkably convergent with the stems acquired, independently, in several pelmatozoan groups (Guensburg et al. 2010).

    However, in all groups, stems were developed from the same, imperforate region of the body wall. In all edrioblastoids known so far, the distal part of the stem was missing, and their attachment strategy was thus unknown. The new Chinese specimen described herein shows a complete stem with a distal holdfast for attachment. The stem is polyplated and clearly less organized than the aboral appendages of more derived edrioblastoids (e.g., Astrocystites). The holdfast is also polyplated, relatively wide, and very gogiid-like (see Sprinkle 1973; Parsley 2012). The holdfast of the holotype of C. guolensis is attached to a trilobite pygidium, suggesting that edrioblastoids were living as skeletal cementers on soft substrates in quiet environmental conditions. The same strategy was documented in many other Cambrian sessile echinoderms living on soft substrates, such as gogiids (Sprinkle 1973; Lin et al. 2008; Zamora et al. 2009), early isorophids (Zamora and Smith 2010), and basal solutans (Daley 1996; Lefebvre and Fatka 2003).

    Acknowledgements.

    Isabel Pérez-Urresti (University of Zaragoza, Spain) provided excellent photograph assistance. The authors are particularly grateful to Imran A. Rahman (Bristol University, UK) and Przemysław Gorzelak (Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland), who reviewed the manuscript and made many helpful remarks. This paper is also a contribution of the team “Vie Primitive, biosignatures, milieux extrêmes” of UMR CNRS 5276, and to the ANR project RALI “Rise of Animal Life (Cambrian—Ordovician)- organization and tempo: evidence from exceptionally preserved biota”. XJZ is funded by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-EW-111) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (40602002, 41072018, 41330101, 41221001, J0630967). SZ was funded by a Ramón y Cajal Grant (RYC-2012-10576) and project CGL2013-48877 from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

    References

    1.

    F.A. Bather 1900. The Echinoderma. In : E.R. Lankester (ed.), A Treatise on Zoology, 3. 344 pp. Adam & Charles Black, London. Google Scholar

    2.

    F.A. Bather 1914. Studies in Edrioasteroidea. 5. Steganoblastus. Geological Magazine 1: 193–203. Google Scholar

    3.

    B.M. Bell 1976. A study of North American Edrioasteroidea. New York State Museum, Memoirs 21: 1–447. Google Scholar

    4.

    B.M. Bell 1982. Edrioasteroids. In : J. Sprinkle (ed.), Echinoderm Faunas from the Bromide Formation (Middle Ordovician) of Oklahoma. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Monograph 1: 297–306. Google Scholar

    5.

    E. Billings 1858. On the Asteriadae of the Lower Silurian rocks of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Canadian Organic Remains 3: 75–85. Google Scholar

    6.

    J.G. Bruguière 1791. Tableau Encyclopédique et Méthodique des Trois Règnes de la Nature. Contenant l'Helminthologie, ou les Vers Infusoires, les Vers Intestins, les Vers Mollusques, etc. Septième livraison. 180 pp. Panckoucke, Paris. Google Scholar

    7.

    P.E.J. Daley 1996. The first solute which is attached as an adult: a Mid- Cambrian fossil from Utah with echinoderm and chordate affinities. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 117: 405–440. Google Scholar

    8.

    R.O. Fay 1962. Edrioblastoidea, a new class of Echinodermata. Journal of Paleontology 36: 201–205. Google Scholar

    9.

    R.O. Fay 1967. Edrioblastoids. In : R.C. Moore (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part S, Echinodermata 1 , 289–292. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence. Google Scholar

    10.

    T.E. Guensburg and J. Sprinkle 1994. Revised phylogeny and functional interpretation of the Edrioasteroidea based on new taxa from the Early and Middle Ordovician of western Utah. Fieldiana (Geology) 29: 1–43. Google Scholar

    11.

    T.E. Guensburg , R. Mooi , J. Sprinkle , B. David , and B. Lefebvre 2010. Pelmatozoan arms from the mid-Cambrian of Australia: bridging the gap between brachioles and brachials? Comment: there is no bridge. Lethaia 43: 432–440. Google Scholar

    12.

    N.R. Han and G.Y. Chen 2008. New stylophorans (Echinodermata) from the Upper Cambrian of Guangxi, South China. Science in China, Series D: Earth Sciences 51: 181–186. Google Scholar

    13.

    G.H. Hudson 1925. The need of improved technique in illustration. Journal of Geology 33: 642–657. Google Scholar

    14.

    G.H. Hudson 1927. The surface characteristics of Astrocystites (Steganoblastus) ottawaensis. Report of the State Geologist on the Mineral Industries and Geology of Vermont 15: 97–110. Google Scholar

    15.

    J.T. Klein 1734. Naturalis dispositio echinodermatum. Accessit lucubratiuncula de aculeis echinorum marinorum, cum spicilegio de belemnitis . 79 pp. Schreiber, Gedani. Google Scholar

    16.

    B. Lefebvre and O. Fatka 2003. Palaeogeographical and palaeoecological aspects of the Cambro-Ordovician radiation of echinoderms in Gondwanan Africa and peri-Gondwanan Europe. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 195: 73–97. Google Scholar

    17.

    R. Lerosey-Aubril , J. Ortega-Hernández , and X.-J. Zhu 2013. The first aglaspidid sensu stricto from the Cambrian of China (Sandu Formation, Guangxi). Geological Magazine 150: 565–571. Google Scholar

    18.

    J.-P. Lin , W.I. Ausich , and Y.-L. Zhao 2008. Settling strategy of stalked echinoderms from the Kaili Biota (Middle) Cambrian, Guizhou Province, South China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 258: 213–221. Google Scholar

    19.

    L.W. Mintz 1970. The Edrioblastoidea: re-evaluation based on a new specimen of Astrocystites from the Middle Ordovician of Ontario. Journal of Paleontology 44: 872–880. Google Scholar

    20.

    R.L. Parsley 2012. Ontogeny, functional morphology, and comparative morphology of lower (Stage 4) and basal Stage 5 Cambrian gogiids, Guizhou Province, China. Journal of Paleontology 86: 569–583. Google Scholar

    21.

    C.R.C. Paul 1976. Palaeogeography of primitive echinoderms in the Ordovician. In : M.G. Bassett (ed.), The Ordovician System: Proceedings of a Palaeontological Association Symposium, Birmingham, September 1974 , 553–574. University of Wales Press and National Museum of Wales, Cardiff. Google Scholar

    22.

    J. Piveteau 1953. Classe des édrioastéroïdes. In : J. Piveteau (ed.), Traité de Paléontologie, Tome 3 , 651–657. Masson, Paris. Google Scholar

    23.

    A.B. Smith and P.A. Jell 1990. Cambrian edrioasteroids from Australia and the origin of starfishes. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 28: 715–778. Google Scholar

    24.

    J. Sprinkle 1973. Morphology and Evolution of Blastozoan Echinoderms. 283 pp. Harvard University Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge. Google Scholar

    25.

    C.D. Sumrall and S. Zamora 2011. Ordovician edrioasteroids from Morocco: faunal exchanges across the Rheic Ocean. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 9: 524–454. Google Scholar

    26.

    C.D. Sumrall , S. Heredia , C.M. Rodríguez , and A.I Mestre . 2013. The first report of South American edrioasteroids and the paleoecology and ontogeny of rhenopyrgid echinoderms. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 58: 763–776. Google Scholar

    27.

    B.D. Webby 1968. Astrocystites distans sp. nov., an edrioblastoid from the Ordovician of eastern Australia. Palaeontology 11: 513–525. Google Scholar

    28.

    B.D. Webby , I.G. Percival , G.D. Edgecombe , R.A. Cooper , A.H.M. Vandenberg , J.W. Pickett , J. Pojeta Jr. , G. Playford , T. Winchester-Seeto , G.C. Young , Y.Y. Zhen , R.S. Nicoll , J.R.P. Ross , and R. Schallreuter 2000. Ordovician palaeobiogeography of Australasia. Memoir of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 23: 63–126. Google Scholar

    29.

    J.F. Whiteaves 1897. Description of a new genus and species of cystidean from the Trenton Limestone at Ottawa. Canadian Record of Sciences 7: 287–292. Google Scholar

    30.

    S. Zamora and A.B. Smith 2010. The oldest isorophid edrioasteroid (Echinodermata) and the evolution of attachment strategies in Cambrian edrioasteroids. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 55: 487–494. Google Scholar

    31.

    S. Zamora , R. Gozalo , and E. Liñán 2009. Middle Cambrian gogiids (Eocrinoidea, Echinodermata) from Northeast Spain: taxonomy, palaeoecology and palaeogeographic implications. Acta Paleontologica Polonica 54: 253–265. Google Scholar

    32.

    R.-B. Zhan , J. Jin , J.-Y. Rong , X.-J. Zhu , and N.-R. Han 2010. Late Cambrian brachiopods from Jingxi, Guangxi Province, South China. Alcheringa 34: 99–133. Google Scholar

    33.

    Z.Y. Zhou and Y.Y. Zhen 2008. Trilobite Record of China. 402 pp. Science Press, Beijing. Google Scholar

    34.

    Z.Y. Zhou , Y.Y. Zhen , S.C. Peng , and X.-J. Zhu 2008. Notes on Cambrian trilobite biogeography of China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 47: 385–392. Google Scholar

    35.

    X.-J. Zhu , N.C. Hughes , and S.C. Peng 2007. On a new species of Shergoldia Zhang & Jell, 1987 (Trilobita), the family Tsinaniidae and the order Asaphida. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 34: 243–253. Google Scholar

    36.

    X.-J. Zhu , N.C. Hughes , and S.C. Peng 2010. Ventral structure and ontogeny of the late Furongian (Cambrian) trilobite Guangxiaspis guangxiensis Zhou, 1977 and the diphyletic origin of the median suture. Journal of Paleontology 84: 493–504. Google Scholar
    Copyright © 2014 X.-J. Zhu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    Xue-Jian Zhu, Samuel Zamora, and Bertrand Lefebvre "Morphology and Palaeoecology of a New Edrioblastoid from the Furongian of China," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 59(4), 921-926, (5 April 2013). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2012.0116
    Received: 26 October 2012; Accepted: 29 March 2013; Published: 5 April 2013
    Back to Top