Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
24 March 2014 The Youngest Ctenocystoids from the Upper Ordovician of the United Kingdom and the Evolution of the Bilateral Body Plan in Echinoderms
Imran A. Rahman, Sarah E. Stewart, Samuel Zamora
Author Affiliations +

During the early Palaeozoic, echinoderm body plans were much more diverse than they are today, displaying four distinct types of symmetry. This included the bilateral ctenocystoids, which were long thought to be restricted to the Cambrian. Here, we describe a new species of ctenocystoid from the Upper Ordovician of Scotland (Conollia sporranoides sp. nov.). This allows us to revise the genus Conollia, which was previously based on a single poorly-known species from the Upper Ordovician of Wales (Conollia staffordi). Both these species are characterized by a unique morphology consisting of an elongate-ovoid body covered in spines, which clearly distinguishes them from their better-known Cambrian relatives; they are interpreted as infaunal or semi-infaunal burrowers from deep-water environments. This indicates that the ctenocystoid body plan was not fixed early in the evolution of the group, and they most likely modified their structure as an adaptation to a new mode of life in the Ordovician.


The initial diversification of echinoderm body plans was extremely rapid, with bilateral, asymmetrical, spiral and pentaradiate forms appearing together in some of the oldest known (Cambrian) echinoderm faunas (Smith et al. 2013). Out of these four clearly differentiated body plans, only pentaradiate clades remain today; all other forms became extinct during the Palaeozoic, over 250 million years ago (Sprinkle 1983; Sumrall and Wray 2007).

The bilateral body plan is perhaps the most intriguing organization in the phylum Echinodermata, recalling their bilaterian ancestry, and it is represented by a single early Palaeozoic group, the ctenocystoids (Fig. 1). While several other groups display bilateral symmetry superimposed on a pentaradiate body plan (e.g., pleurocystitid rhombiferans and irregular echinoids), only ctenocystoids lack any trace of underlying radiality. Some have argued that ctenocystoids indicate the plesiomorphic condition for echinoderms (Ubaghs 1975; Rahman and Clausen 2009; Zamora et al. 2012), while others interpret them as secondarily derived, with the most primitive known echinoderms pentaradiate (Sumrall 1997; David et al. 2000; Sumrall and Wray 2007). This debate has been fuelled, in part, by their unusual character combination; ctenocystoids are stem-less and have a strongly bilaterally symmetrical body (theca), which is typically flattened and framed by one or, more often, two rings of marginal plates. Both the upper and lower thecal surfaces are covered by flexible, tessellated membranes. At the anterior of the theca, a specialized organ called the ctenidium covers the mouth; this is composed of a series of distinctive blade-like plates. At the posterior, the anus is represented by a cone-shaped aperture (Robison and Sprinkle 1969; Rahman and Clausen 2009).

Fig. 1.

Representative Cambrian ctenocystoid echinoderms. A, B. Ctenocystis utahensis Robison and Sprinkle, 1969 from Cambrian Series 3 of the United States. USNM 163252 in dorsal (A1) and anterior (A2) views; USNM 595079 in right lateral view (B). C. Undescribed ctenocystoid (Ctenocystoid gen. et sp. nov 1 in Smith et al. 2013) from Cambrian Series 3 of Morocco. NHMUK EE 15428 in dorsal view. D. Courtessolea moncereti Domínguez Alonso, 2004 from Cambrian Series 3 of France. MNHN F.A45783 in dorsal view. E. Courtessolea sp. from Cambrian Series 3 of Spain. MPZ 2009/1234b in ventral view. F. Undescribed ctenocystoid (Ctenocystoid gen. et sp. nov 2 in Smith et al. 2013) from Cambrian Series 3 of Morocco. NHMUK EE 15317 in ventral view. G, H. Jugoszovia archaeocyathoides Dzik and Orłowski, 1995 from Cambrian Series 3 of Poland. ZPAL Ec1/9 in ventral view (G); ZPAL Ec1/1 in anterior view (H). All specimens are latex casts whitened with ammonium chloride sublimate.


Ctenocystoids were geographically widespread in the Cambrian (reported from Baltica, Laurentia, East Gondwana, and West Gondwana), but had a limited stratigraphical range, being restricted to Stage 5 and the Drumian (Smith et al. 2013; Zamora et al. 2013). In addition, a single enigmatic species has been reported from post-Cambrian rocks, Conollia staffordi Domínguez Alonso, 2004 from the Upper Ordovician of Wales. Here, we report a new species of ctenocystoid, Conollia sporranoides sp. nov., from the Upper Ordovician of Scotland, and accordingly reconsider the anatomy of the genus. This provides novel insights into the functional morphology and mode of life of Conollia Domínguez Alonso, 2004.

Institutional abbreviations. —GLAHM, Hunterian Museum, Glasgow, UK; MNHN, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; MPZ, Museo de Paleontología, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; NHMUK, Natural History Museum, London, UK; USNM, Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., USA; ZPAL, Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.

Nomenclatural acts. —The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names contained herein are available under that Code from the electronic edition of this article. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in Zoo- Bank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The Zoo- Bank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix “”. The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank. org:act:6A991154-F352-403E-8F2D-36D065CC9379.

The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with an ISSN 0567-7920, eISSN 1732-2421, and has been archived and is available from the following digital repository:

Geological setting, material, and methods

Approximately 26 specimens of Conollia sporranoides sp. nov. (GLAHM 131255/1-GLAHM 131255/26) were collected from the Laggan Member of the Balclatchie Formation at Dalfask Quarry in Girvan, northwest Scotland, UK (Fig. 2). This locality is part of a deep-water Konservat Lagerstätte, which is early Caradoc (Sandbian, Upper Ordovician) in age. Dalfask Quarry exposes a succession of blue-grey, calcareous, laminated siltstone and mudstone beds, representing a localized low-oxygen environment below the photic zone, perhaps with an unconsolidated muddy substrate (Stewart and Owen 2008). It contains a diverse, unusual fauna of benthic invertebrates, which is dominated by the odontopleurid trilobite Diacanthaspis trippi, the orthid brachiopod Onniella williamsi, the polyplacophoran Solenocaris solenoides, a possible new species of the stylophoran Anatifopsis and the ctenocystoid Conollia sporranoides sp. nov. (Stewart and Owen 2008). Ctenocystoids occur on a single slab of laminated siltstone (along with complete specimens of Diacanthaspis trippi). The fossils are preserved as moulds and are sometimes partially pyritized.

In addition, we studied all 34 known specimens of Conollia staffordi (NHMUK EE 5903-NHMUK EE 5933), which came originally from a small quarry near the village of Clarbeston, southwest Wales, UK. This probably corresponds to the lower part of the Mydrim Shale Formation, which is lower Caradoc (Sandbian, Upper Ordovician) in age. The quarry consists of fissile black shales and subordinate mudstone, which were likely deposited in a relatively deep-water, possibly anoxic basin. Ctenocystoids are associated with trilobites, ostracods, and abundant graptolites (Fortey 2006). Similar to Conollia sporranoides sp. nov., all specimens of Conollia staffordi are preserved as moulds in grey-brown shale.

In order to accurately describe the morphology of Conollia sporranoides sp. nov. and Conollia staffordi, specimens were cast in latex; these casts were whitened with ammonium chloride sublimate and photographed, and subsequently coated in gold and imaged with scanning electron microscopy. Furthermore, X-ray micro-tomography was used to image the slab of siltstone containing multiple specimens of Conollia sporranoides sp. nov. This sample was scanned on a Nikon XT H 225 ST cabinet scanner at the Natural History Museum, London, using a current/voltage of 180 kV/150 μA. This generated a dataset of 1950 slice images with a voxel size of about 30 μm (SOM 1: Supplementary Online Material available at This dataset was then digitally reconstructed using the freely available SPIERS software suite (Sutton et al. 2012). An inverted linear threshold was applied, creating binary images with all pixels darker than a user-defined grey level turned “on” (white). The “on” pixels identified as belonging to the fossils were manually assigned to distinct regions-of-interest, which were then rendered as separate isosurfaces to give an interactive three-dimensional virtual reconstruction (SOM 2). High-quality images (Fig. 3G–I) were produced in the opensource program Blender (

Fig. 2.

Stratigraphical position (A) and geographical location (B) of the site where Conollia sporranoides sp. nov. was collected. Adapted from Ingham (1992).


Systematic palaeontology

Phylum Echinodermata Bruguière, 1791 (ex Klein, 1734)
Class Ctenocystoidea Robison and Sprinkle, 1969
Genus Conollia Domínguez Alonso, 2004

  • Type species: Conollia staffordi Domínguez Alonso, 2004; Upper Ordovician (Sandbian) of Wales, UK.

  • Emended diagnosis.—A ctenocystoid with an elongate-ovoid theca, no marginal frame and thecal ossicles expanded at the posterior as thin spines. Ctenidial plating weakly or undifferentiated, consisting of multiple small radially-oriented bladelike ctenoid plates. Long, serrated spines situated at the base of the ctenidium.

  • Remarks.—The genus and type species were erected by Domínguez Alonso (2004), but have largely been overlooked in subsequent discussions of early Palaeozoic echinoderms. This might be because there was some doubt about the validity of this work for zoological nomenclature. However, because (i) the work was issued for the purpose of providing a public and permanent scientific record, (ii) the work was obtainable free of charge when first issued in 2004, and (iii) identical and simultaneously obtainable copies are available as PDFs from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid E-Prints repository ( and printed on paper from six major publicly-accessible libraries (Universidad Complutense de Madrid; Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales; Natural History Museum, London; Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History; Museum für Naturkunde; Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle), it meets the criteria of what constitutes published work (for the purposes of zoological nomenclature) according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (articles 8 and 9, ICZN 1999, 2012). The taxonomic names introduced in Domínguez Alonso (2004) are therefore considered valid.

  • Geographic and stratigraphic range.—Northwest Scotland and southwest Wales, UK. Lower Caradoc (Sandbian), Upper Ordovician.

  • Conollia sporranoides sp. nov.
    Fig. 3; SOM 1, 2.

  • Etymology: From the Scottish Gaelic sporran, purse, pouch, and the Greek eidos, form, likeness; in reference to the similarity of the body to a traditional Scottish pouch.

  • Holotype: GLAHM 131255/2, complete specimen preserved as a mould in siltstone.

  • Type locality: Dalfask Quarry in Girvan, northwest Scotland, UK.

  • Type horizon: Laggan Member, Balclatchie Formation, lower Caradoc (equivalent to the Sandbian), Upper Ordovician.

  • Material.—GLAHM 131255/1-GLAHM 131255/26, approxi mately 26 specimens preserved as moulds in siltstone from the Laggan Member of the Balclatchie Formation at Dalfask Quarry in Girvan, northwest Scotland, UK.

  • Diagnosis.—A species of Conollia with undifferentiated ctenidial plating. Serrated spines at the base of the ctenidium are long and fine.

  • Description.—Small (approximately 4–6 mm long), bilaterally symmetrical ctenocystoid; elongate-ovoid in outline, with a prominent ctenidium situated at the anterior of a thinly- plated theca covered in spines.

    The ctenidium is circular in anterior aspect and hemispherical in dorsal view, and measures approximately 1–3 mm in width. It comprises a dorso-ventrally compressed ring of at least 16–18 small (up to about 1 mm in diameter), thin, blade-like ctenoid plates (Fig. 3B–E). These plates are not differentiated in terms of morphology or size; they are hemispherical in outline, with posterior rectangular projections that have flat outer faces (Fig. 3C, I). There are no other specialized ctenidial plates. Long, fine, serrated spines, measuring up to about 1 mm in length, are located adjacent to the ctenidium (Fig. 3D, F). These spines might have articulated with the outer faces of the posterior bases of the ctenoid plates.

    The theca is elongate with a rounded posterior margin. It is composed of multiple thin polygonal plates, with no marginal frame. There is no clear differentiation between the plating of the dorsal and ventral surfaces. Numerous fine, hair-like spines cover the entire theca; they measure up to about 0.5–0.8 mm in length (typically longer towards the anterior) and are curved rearwards (Fig. 3A, B). The nature of the transition between the ctenidium and the theca is ambiguous. The anus cannot be identified.

  • Remarks.—Conollia sporranoides sp. nov. can be confidently assigned to the genus Conollia on the basis of its small, spiny, elongate-ovoid theca, which lacks a marginal frame. However, this species differs from Conollia staffordi (Fig. 4) in having undifferentiated ctenidial plating, lacking the large dorso-central ossicle that is characteristic of the type species (Fig. 4B, C). Moreover, the body is slightly shorter and the spines (both thecal and serrated) generally finer compared to Conollia staffordi. Finally, there is no clear differentiation of the dorsal and ventral surfaces in Conollia sporranoides sp. nov., but in Conollia staffordi the spines can be noticeably thicker on the ventral surface (Fig. 4C).

  • Geographic and stratigraphic range.—Girvan, northwest Scotland, UK; Lower Caradoc (Sandbian), Upper Ordovician.

  • Discussion

    Comparison with other ctenocystoids.—The presence of an anterior ctenidium and the strong bilateral symmetry of the skeleton clearly identify Conollia as a ctenocystoid. However, Conollia staffordi and Conollia sporranoides sp. nov. are distinguished from all other ctenocystoids by the complete absence of a marginal frame, the weakly or undifferentiated nature of the ctenidial plating and the elongate- ovoid theca covered in spines. Out of all the formally described ctenocystoid genera, Conollia is most similar to Jugoszovia (Fig. 1G, H), which has a greatly reduced marginal frame and near-perfect bilateral symmetry; however, the ctenidial plating is more differentiated in Jugoszovia, and moreover the theca is sub-triangular, flattened and lacks spines (Dzik and Orłowski 1995). Courtessolea (Fig. 1D, E) displays strong bilateral symmetry, like Conollia, but is otherwise rather different, possessing a well-developed, single-layered marginal frame, a flattened theca and clearly differentiated plating of the ctenidium (Domínguez Alonso 2004). Finally, Ctenocystis, Etoctenocystis, Gilcidia, and Pembrocystis are most dissimilar to Conollia, being characterized by double-layered marginal frames, flattened, weakly asymmetrical thecae, and differentiated ctenidial plating (Robison and Sprinkle 1969; Sprinkle and Robison 1978; Fatka and Kordule 1985; Jell et al. 1985; Ubaghs 1987; Ubaghs and Robison 1988; Domínguez Alonso 2004; Rahman and Clausen 2009).

    Fig. 3.

    Ctenocystoid echinoderm Conollia sporranoides sp. nov. from the Upper Ordovician of Scotland, UK. A. GLAHM 131255/1, partial specimen. B. GLAHM 131255/2, complete specimen. C. GLAHM 131255/3, partial ctenidium in lateral view. D. GLAHM 131255/4, partial ctenidium in adoral view. E. GLAHM 131255/5, partial ctenidium. F. GLAHM 131255/6, partial ctenidium. G. GLAHM 131255/7, complete ctenidium in anterior view. H. GLAHM 131255/8, partial ctenidium in anterior view. I. GLAHM 131255/9, partial ctenidium in anterior view. Photographs of original specimens (A, B), latex casts whitened with ammonium chloride sublimate (C–F), and virtual reconstructions (G–I). Abbreviations: as, articulations for serrated spines; cp, ctenoid plates; ss, serrated spines; ts, thecal spines.


    Fig. 4.

    Ctenocystoid echinoderm Conollia staffordi Domínguez Alonso, 2004 from the Upper Ordovician of Wales, UK. A. NHMUK EE 5913, complete specimen in ventral view (A1), detail of ctenidium (A2) and detail of neck spines (A3, A4). B. NHMUK EE 5929a, complete specimen in ventral view (B1) and detail of spines (B2, B3). C. NHMUK EE 5916 (holotype), complete specimen in anteroventral view. D. NHMUK EE 5910, partial specimen in lateral view (D1) and detail of neck (D2). Photographs of latex casts whitened with ammonium chloride sublimate (A1, A2, A3, B1, C, D1, D2) and scanning electron microscope images of latex casts coated in gold (A4, B2, B3). Abbreviations: as, articulations for serrated spines; cp, ctenoid plates; sp, suroral plate; ss, serrated spines; ts, thecal spines.


    Smith et al. (2013) reported two ctenocystoids from Morocco (awaiting formal description) that can be compared with Conollia. Ctenocystoid gen. et sp. nov. 1 (Smith et al. 2013: fig. 4f; Fig. 1C) resembles Conollia in having a bilaterally symmetrical body covered with spines, and might also lack a differentiated marginal frame (the ctenidial plating is unclear), but its flattened, sub-triangular theca is similar to other, more typical ctenocystoids, particularly Jugoszovia. Ctenocystoid gen. et sp. nov. 2 (Smith et al. 2013: fig. 4b, h; Fig. 1F) possesses a robust, single-layered marginal frame, a flattened theca and clearly differentiated ctenidial plating, characters which are strongly dissimilar to Conollia. One final comparison can be made with the primitive, bilaterally symmetrical, ctenocystoid-like fossil Ctenoimbricata, which possesses spiny expansions of the thecal plates similar to those of Conollia. However, Ctenoimbricata is distinguished by the possession of a single-layered marginal frame, differentiated ctenidial plating and a flattened theca, and furthermore the spines of Conollia are much more widely distributed across the skeleton than those of Ctenoimbricata (which are restricted to the dorsal integument and marginal frame) (Zamora et al. 2012). Based on its morphology and stratigraphic position, we suggest that Conollia is a derived ctenocystoid, perhaps most closely related to Jugoszovia and ctenocystoid gen. et sp. nov. 1 from Smith et al. (2013).

    Mode of life.—Conollia possesses a unique anatomical structure, which comprises a ctenidium with weakly or undifferentiated plating and an elongate-ovoid theca covered in spines and lacking a marginal frame. Below, we consider the functional significance of these characters and discuss the implications for the animal's mode of life.

    Owing to their bilateral symmetry, most workers that have studied ctenocystoids have argued that they were motile animals. Robison and Sprinkle (1969), Sprinkle and Robison (1978), Jefferies et al. (1996) and Domínguez Alonso (1999, 2004) suggested that ctenocystoids were capable of propelling themselves forward by jet propulsion—presumably through strong muscular contraction of the body cavity, causing water to be forcefully expelled out the posterior anus. This is, however, extremely unlikely on morphofunctional grounds; thecal flexion was greatly restricted by the rigid frame in typical Cambrian ctenocystoids, which were most probably sessile in life (Rahman and Clausen 2009). In contrast, the absence of marginal plates in Conollia implies a significantly higher degree of thecal flexibility compared to other ctenocystoids; taken together with its strong bilateral symmetry, this points towards a more active mode of life. We consider jet propulsion (as outlined above) an improbable means of locomotion because the numerous long spines and the bulky ctenidium (Figs. 3A, B, 4A–C) would likely have created high drag and low stability in the water column. Furthermore, the worm-like body of Conollia is quite unlike that of jet propulsors such as cephalopods, jellyfish and scallops (Daniel 1984). Parsley (1999) and Parsley and Prokop (2004) suggested that ctenocystoids might have been able to move using the ctenidium, but the lack of specialized ventral plates (i.e., the robust suboral plates, which could plausibly have been used to displace the sediment) argues strongly against this for Conollia. Instead, we propose that Conollia was able to move slowly by contracting the body-wall musculature of the theca in peristaltic waves, similar to some modern holothurians, annelids and nemerteans (Heffernan and Wainwright 1974; Clark 1981; Turbeville and Ruppert 1983).

    The numerous long, fine spines that cover the theca of Conollia have been interpreted as adaptations to a semi-infaunal mode of life, aiding penetration into the substrate (Domínguez Alonso 1999, 2004). An alternative possibility is that the spines enhanced stability on the seafloor by increasing the surface area of the animal; however, if this was true then substantial dorsoventral differentiation would be expected, and there is only very limited variation between spines on the upper and lower thecal surfaces in Conollia staffordi (Fig. 4A, C) and no differentiation in Conollia sporranoides sp. nov. Moreover, the rounded outline of the theca would have meant that only a small part of the body was in contact with the substrate at any given time, conveying poor stability on the sediment surface (in contrast to other ctenocystoids, which are characterized by flattened lower surfaces that seem well adapted to life resting on the seafloor; Rahman and Clausen 2009). The spiny, ovoid theca of Conollia is more compatible with an active, burrowing mode of life, and therefore we agree with Domínguez Alonso (1999, 2004) that Conollia was at least partly infaunal. Several modern holothurians, annelids and nemerteans penetrate the substrate using peristaltic locomotory waves (Heffernan and Wainwright 1974; Clark 1981; Turbeville and Ruppert 1983; Bromley 1996), and a similar mechanism is hypothesized for Conollia. The spines of Conollia are strongly curved backwards (Figs. 3A, B, 4A, C), and this suggests that movement was preferentially in the forward direction. In some modern burrowing polychaetes and echinoids, comparable fine structures (chaetae and spines) serve to aid locomotion and/or sediment excavation (Nichols 1959; Smith and Crimes 1983; Fauchald and Rouse 1997; Merz and Woodin 2006); however, this function seems unlikely for Conollia as the spines did not have muscular articulations and, hence, were not independently motile. Instead, the spines most probably helped to keep mud away from the body and brace Conollia within the burrow (similar to the capillary chaetae in certain infaunal polychaetes; Merz and Woodin 2006).

    Fig. 5.

    Reconstructions of two possible modes of life of Conollia. A. A semi-infaunal mode of life. B. An infaunal mode of life. Adapted from Domínguez Alonso (2004).


    The feeding mechanism and tiering position of Conollia are unclear. If it used the ctenidium to passively capture resuspended organic particles just above the seafloor, as has been suggested for other ctenocystoids (Rahman and Clausen 2009; Zamora et al. 2012) and similar to some modern holothurians (Bromley 1996), a semi-infaunal mode of life is necessitated so that the anterior feeding apparatus could maintain contact with the sediment surface (Fig. 5A). Alternatively, Conollia could have actively fed on organic detritus within the sediment, similar to some modern annelids (Bromley 1996), in which case a permanent opening to the sediment—water interface might not have been required and, hence, a fully infaunal mode of life would be feasible (Fig. 5B). The reduction/loss of the suroral plate, which is thought to have controlled currents into and out of the body in other ctenocystoids (Rahman and Clausen 2009; Zamora et al. 2012), might indicate a lower degree of feeding selectivity in Conollia, perhaps more compatible with a subsurface deposit-feeding mode of life. Additional material, particularly any associated trace fossils, could shed further light on the mode of life of this animal.

    Palaeoenvironment.—Conollia sporranoides sp. nov. comes from calcareous laminated siltstone/mudstone beds that were deposited in a deep-shelf environment, as implied by the associated fauna of deep-water trilobites (including the blind Diacanthaspis trippi) and brachiopods (Stewart and Owen 2008). Conollia staffordi is also from rocks inferred to have been deposited in a relatively deep-water environment, based on the accompanying deep-water trilobites (with no or reduced eyes) and graptolites (Fortey 2006). The presence of fairly complete, articulated specimens of both Conollia sporranoides sp. nov. and Conollia staffordi, including several individuals with spines in life position (Figs. 3A, B, 4A–C), strongly suggests that post-mortem transport was minimal (i.e., specimens are autochthonous or parautochthonous); anything more extensive would most likely have caused disarticulation of the fragile skeleton (as is the case for other weakly articulated fossil echinoderms; Brett et al. 1997). Furthermore, there is no evidence of abrasion-induced skeletal damage, which can be indicative of long-distance transportation in echinoderms (Gorzelak and Salamon 2013). The fauna associated with both Conollia species also implies minimal transport, notably the occurrence of complete, articulated trilobites, stylophorans and chitons (Fortey 2006; Stewart and Owen 2008). For these reasons, we suggest that Conollia almost certainly inhabited a deep-water environment in life.

    The apparent 40-million-year gap in the ctenocystoid fossil record, from the widespread occurrence of genera in Cambrian Series 3 to the first appearance of Conollia in the Upper Ordovician, probably reflects a taphonomic bias related to their palaeoenvironment. Deep-water lagerstätten from the upper Cambrian and Ordovician are relatively rare (although see e.g., Van Roy et al. 2010; Botting et al. 2011), meaning that the likelihood of ctenocystoids being preserved intact and articulated was very low. Isolated plates probably occur in greater numbers, but might be difficult to recognise as ctenocystoids (or could otherwise have been overlooked due to their small size).


    In this paper, we describe a new ctenocystoid from the Upper Ordovician of Scotland (Conollia sporranoides sp. nov.) and revise the genus that this species belongs to. These fossils demonstrate that the bilateral body plan of ctenocystoids persisted for over 50 million years following its first appearance in the Cambrian (Smith et al. 2013). Ctenocystoids show considerable morphological disparity, and there are significant differences between Cambrian and Ordovician forms. The steps involved in the evolutionary transition from a typical Cambrian ctenocystoid such as Jugoszovia to the derived genus Conollia included the complete loss of the marginal frame (and associated inflation of the theca), the reduction/loss of differentiated ctenidial plating and the pronounced development of spines. These changes most likely reflect the new infaunal or semi-infaunal mode of life adopted by Conollia in the Ordovician, which contrasts with the epifaunal habits of typical Cambrian taxa (Rahman and Clausen 2009).


    We thank Stuart Kearns (University of Bristol, UK) for assistance with scanning electron microscopy, Richard Abel (Natural History Museum, London, UK) for assistance with X-ray micro-tomography and Isabel Pérez (Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain) for help preparing images. We are grateful to Euan Clarkson (University of Edinburgh, UK), Neil Clark (Hunterian Museum, Glasgow, UK), Richard Jefferies (Natural History Museum, London, UK) and Alan Owen (University of Glasgow, UK) for access to and discussions about Conollia, and to Sébastien Clausen (Université Lille 1, Sciences et Technologie, France) and Przemysław Gorzelak (ZPAL) for their detailed reviews. IAR was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant number NE/H015817/1) and the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851. SZ was funded by a Ramón y Cajal Grant (RYC-2012-10576) and projects CGL2012-39471 and CGL2013-48877 from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.



    J.P. Botting , L.A. Muir , M.D. Sutton , and T. Barnie 2011. Welsh Gold: a new exceptionally preserved pyritised Ordovician biota. Geology 39: 879–882. Google Scholar


    C.E. Brett , H.A. Moffat , and W.L. Taylor 1997. Echinoderm taphonomy, taphofacies, and lagerstätten. In : J.A. Waters and C.G. Maples (eds.), Geobiology of Echinoderms. Paleontological Society Papers 3: 147–190. Google Scholar


    R.G. Bromley 1996. Trace Fossils: Biology, Taphonomy and Applications. 361 pp. Chapman & Hall, London. Google Scholar


    R.B. Clark 1981. Locomotion and the phylogeny of the Metazoa. Bolletino di Zoologia 48: 11–28. Google Scholar


    T.L. Daniel 1984. Unsteady aspects of aquatic locomotion. American Zoologist 24: 121–134. Google Scholar


    B. David , B. Lefebvre , R. Mooi , and R. Parsley 2000. Are homalozoans echinoderms? An answer from the extraxial-axial theory. Paleobiology 26: 529–555. Google Scholar


    P. Domínguez Alonso 1999. The early evolution of echinoderms: the class Ctenocystoidea and its closest relatives revisited. In : M.D. Candia Carnevali and F. Bonasoro (eds.), Echinoderm Research 1998 , 263–268. Balkema, Rotterdam. Google Scholar


    P. Domínguez Alonso 2004. Sistemática, anatomía, estructura y función de Ctenocystoidea (Echinodermata, Carpoidea) del Paleozoico Inferior. 538 pp. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid. Google Scholar


    J. Dzik and S. Orłowski 1995. Primitive ctenocystoid echinoderm from the earliest Middle Cambrian of Poland. Annales de Paléontologie 81: 17–35. Google Scholar


    O. Fatka and V. Kordule 1985. Etoctenocystis bohemica gen. et sp. nov., new ctenocystoid from Czechoslovakia (Echinodermata, Middle Cambrian). Věstník Ústředního ústavu geologického 60: 225–230. Google Scholar


    K. Fauchald and G. Rouse 1997. Polychaete systematics: past and present. Zoologica Scripta 26: 71–138. Google Scholar


    R.A. Fortey 2006. A new deep-water Upper Ordovician (Caradocian) trilobite fauna from South-West Wales. Geological Journal 41: 243–253. Google Scholar


    P. Gorzelak and M.A. Salamon 2013. Experimental tumbling of echinoderms—taphonomic patterns and implications. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 386: 569–574. Google Scholar


    J.M. Heffernan and S.A. Wainwright 1974. Locomotion of the holothurian Euapta lappa and redefinition of peristalsis. Biology Bulletin 147: 95–104. Google Scholar


    ICZN . 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature , 4th edition . 306 pp. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. Google Scholar


    ICZN. 2012. Amendment of articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the international code of zoological nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Zootaxa 3450: 1–7. Google Scholar


    J.K. Ingham 1992. Girvan foreshore. In : J.D. Lawson and S.D. Weedon (eds.), Geological Excursions Around Glasgow and Girvan , 396–416. Glasgow Geological Society, Glasgow. Google Scholar


    R.P.S. Jefferies , N.A. Brown , and P.E.J. Daley 1996. The early phylogeny of chordates and echinoderms and the origin of chordate left-right asymmetry and bilateral symmetry. Acta Zoologica 77: 101–122. Google Scholar


    P.A. Jell , C.F. Burrett , and M.R. Banks 1985. Cambrian and Ordovician echinoderms from eastern Australia. Alcheringa 9: 183–208. Google Scholar


    R.A. Merz and S.A. Woodin 2006. Polychaete chaetae: function, form, and phylogeny. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46: 481–496. Google Scholar


    D. Nichols 1959. Changes in the chalk heart-urchin Micraster interpreted in relation to living forms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 242: 347–437. Google Scholar


    R.L. Parsley 1999. The Cincta (Homostelea) as blastozoans. In : M.D. Candia Carnevali and F. Bonasoro (eds.), Echinoderm Research 1998 , 369–375. Balkema, Rotterdam. Google Scholar


    R.L. Parsley and R.J. Prokop 2004. Functional morphology and paleoecology of some sessile Middle Cambrian echinoderms from the Barrandian region of Bohemia. Bulletin of Geosciences 79: 147–156. Google Scholar


    I.A. Rahman and S. Clausen 2009. Re-evaluating the palaeobiology and affinities of the Ctenocystoidea (Echinodermata). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 7: 413–426. Google Scholar


    R.A. Robison and J. Sprinkle 1969. Ctenocystoidea: new class of primitive echinoderms. Science 166: 1512–1514. Google Scholar


    A.B. Smith and T.P. Crimes 1983. Trace fossils formed by heart urchins—a study of Scolicia and related traces. Lethaia 16: 79–92. Google Scholar


    A.B. Smith , S. Zamora , and J.J. Álvaro 2013. The oldest echinoderm faunas from Gondwana show that echinoderm body plan diversification was rapid. Nature Communications 4: 1385. Google Scholar


    J. Sprinkle 1983. Patterns and problems in echinoderm evolution. In : M. Jangoux and J.M. Lawrence (eds.), Echinoderm Studies , 1–18. Balkema, Rotterdam. Google Scholar


    J. Sprinkle and R.A. Robison 1978. Addendum to subphylum Homalozoa Ctenocystoids. In : R.C. Moore and C. Teichert (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2, Crinoidea, T998-T1002. Geological Society of America, Boulder and the University of Kansas, Lawrence. Google Scholar


    S.E. Stewart and A.W. Owen 2008. Probing the deep shelf: a Lagerstätte from the Upper Ordovician of Girvan, southwest Scotland. Lethaia 41: 139–146. Google Scholar


    C.D. Sumrall 1997. The role of fossils in the phylogenetic reconstruction of Echinodermata. In : J.A. Waters and C.G. Maples (eds.), Geobiology of Echinoderms. Paleontological Society Papers 3: 267–288. Google Scholar


    C.D. Sumrall and G.A. Wray 2007. Ontogeny in the fossil record: diversification of body plans and the evolution of “aberrant” symmetry in Paleozoic echinoderms. Paleobiology 33: 149–163. Google Scholar


    M.D. Sutton , R.J. Garwood , D.J. Siveter , and D.J. Siveter 2012. SPIERS and VAXML; a software toolkit for tomographic visualization and a format for virtual specimen interchange. Palaeontologia Electronica 15: 5T. Google Scholar


    J.M. Turbeville and E.E. Ruppert 1983. Epidermal muscles and peristaltic burrowing in Carinoma tremaphoros (Nermertini): correlates of effective burrowing without segmentation. Zoomorphology 103: 103–120. Google Scholar


    G. Ubaghs 1975. Early Palaeozoic echinoderms. Reviews in Earth and Planetary Science 3: 79–98. Google Scholar


    G. Ubaghs 1987. Échinodermes nouveaux du Cambrien moyen de la Montagne Noire (France). Annales de Paléontologie 73: 1–27. Google Scholar


    G. Ubaghs and R.A. Robison 1988. Homalozoan echinoderms of the Wheeler Formation (Middle Cambrian) of western Utah. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 120: 1–17. Google Scholar


    P. Van Roy , P.J. Orr , J.P. Botting , L.A. Muir , J. Vinther , B. Lefebvre , K. el Hariri , and D.E.G. Briggs 2010. Ordovician faunas of Burgess Shale type. Nature 465: 215–218. Google Scholar


    S. Zamora , I.A. Rahman , and A.B. Smith 2012. Plated Cambrian bilaterians reveal the earliest stages of echinoderm evolution. PLoS ONE 7: e38296. Google Scholar


    S. Zamora , B. Lefebvre , J.J. Álvaro , S. Clausen , O. Elicki , O. Fatka , P. Jell , A. Kouchinsky , J.-P. Lin , E. Nardin , R. Parsley , S. Rozhnov , J. Sprinkle , C.D. Sumrall , D. Vizcaïno , and A.B. Smith 2013. Global Cambrian echinoderm diversity and palaeobiogeography. In : D.A.T. Harper and T. Servais (eds.), Early Palaeozoic Palaeobiogeography and Palaeogeography. Geological Society , London, Memoirs 38: 157–171. Google Scholar
    Copyright © 2015 I.A. Rahman et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    Imran A. Rahman, Sarah E. Stewart, and Samuel Zamora "The Youngest Ctenocystoids from the Upper Ordovician of the United Kingdom and the Evolution of the Bilateral Body Plan in Echinoderms," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 60(1), 39-48, (24 March 2014).
    Received: 4 December 2013; Accepted: 1 March 2014; Published: 24 March 2014
    bilateral symmetry
    body plans
    United Kingdom
    Back to Top