Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2012 A New Stenopterous Genus of the Tribe Gaetuliini Fennah (Hemiptera, Fulgoroidea, Tropiduchidae) from Southern Africa — Particular Intercontinental Convergence
Vladimir M. Gnezdilov
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Afroelfus bothryogaster gen. et sp. n. is described from the Republic of South Africa. The new genus belongs to the tribe Gaetuliini of the family Tropiduchidae. It is characterized by the presence of sternoabdominal sensory pits in the imago and its stenopterism. The distribution of these two attributes within planthoppers is discussed and the new genus is recognised as convergently similar to the Australian genus Alleloplasis Waterhouse, 1839.

INTRODUCTION

The systematics of the Tropiduchidae is well advanced as Fennah (1982) divided the family in 15 tribes. How they can be grouped together has still to receive consideration, though, because Fennah did not provide any subfamilic division. Currently, the family includes 19 existent and extinct tribes (Szwedo & Stroiński 2010). The new genus described below belongs to the tribe Gaetuliini Fennah, recently transferred to the Tropiduchidae from the Nogodinidae by Gnezdilov (2007) on the basis of the hemisphaerical gonoplacs. The tribe Gaetuliini comprises 28 genera, including the new one, and is distributed across arid zones from southern USA via South America, southern Africa, and Madagascar to Australia (Gnezdilov 2007; Stroiński & Gnezdilov 2009). Externally, the new genus looks like the Australian genus Alleloplasis Waterhouse, 1839, one of the most peculiar and bizarre planthopper genera, characterized by extremely narrow and long fore wings (stenopterism) and by the presence of sensory pits on abdominal sternites in the imago (Fig. 6). The last character is unique within Fulgoroidea and also recorded only for Fovealvus nama Gnezdilov & Wilson, 2007 (Nogodinidae) from Namibia (Gnezdilov & Wilson 2007); in the Issidae genera Kathleenum Gnezdilov, 2004 and Balduza Gnezdilov & O'Brien, 2006, each with two species from southern USA and Mexico (Gnezdilov & O'Brien 2006); and in Lethierium Dlabola, 1980, with three species from Algeria and Morocco (unpublished).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The terminology of the head and thorax follows Anufriev & Emeljanov (1988) and Emeljanov (1995).

Pictures of the new species were obtained using a Leica Z16 APOA with Leica video camera DFC490. The picture ofAlleloplasis darwini Waterhouse, 1839 is of the specimen in the Natural History Museum (London, UK). It was taken using a Leica MZ8 with JVC video camera KY F7OB. Images were produced using the software Leica Application Suite ver. 2.8.1., Auto-Montage Essentials, and Adobe Photoshop.

The holotype of the new species described below is to be deposited in the collection of the Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa (SAMC).

TAXONOMY

Family Tropiduchidae Stål, 1866
Tribe Gaetuliini Fennah, 1978
Genus Afroelfus gen. n.

  • Etymology: The generic name is derived from ‘Africa’ and ‘elf’ (fantastic character).

  • Type species: Afroelfus bothryogaster sp. n.

  • Diagnosis: Head and body covered by setae, more dense on metope, clypeus, anal tube, and gonoplacs. Metope wide, flat, joint with coryphe at obtuse angle (in lateral view), with median carina running through post- and anteclypeus and sublateral carinae (Figs 2, 3, 11). Lateral keels and median carina of metope elevated. Scape short, cylindrical. Pedicel nearly globular, with sensory organs. Coryphe transverse, very narrow, with slightly concave anterior margin and distinctly concave posterior margin (Figs 1, 10). Coryphe with keeled margins. Pronotum with median carina, anterior margin convex, posterior margin concave (Fig. 10). Paradiscal fields of pronotum are covered by eyes. Paranotal lobes wide, elongate. Mesonotum has no carination, nearly as long as pronotum medially, with widely rounded apex. Meso- and metanotum are divided by deep furrow (Fig. 1). Metanotum with two furrows converging apically in the shape of a triangle. Forewings with setae on costal and claval margins on both sides, 1.5 times as long as the body, very narrow, with only 2 longitudinal veins joint apically and rudimentary triangular clavus (Figs 1, 2, 9). Hind wings rudimentary, in shape of small scales. Hind tibia with 7 apical spines and single lateral spine distally. First and second metatarsomeres equal in length, with ventral surface covered by long setae. First metatarsomere with 2 latero-apical spines and entire row of 7 or 8 intermediate spines with subapical setae. Second metatarsomere with only 2 latero-apical spines. Pretarsus expands the apices of claws, with two long, narrow dorsolateral plates. Abdomen squat, weakly convex (in lateral view) (Fig. 2). Abdominal sternite III with a row of 7 sensory pits and the sternites IV–VI each with a row of 8 sensory pits on their hind margins medially (Fig. 5). Hind margin of sternite VII widely concave. Hind margin of pygofer with pair of semicircular processes alongside anal tube (Figs 4, 12). Gonoplacs hemisphaerical, with no carination. Anal tube wide, short, narrowing apically (Fig. 12). Anal column short.

  • Comparison: As judged by the wide metope with median carina, narrow coryphe, and squat body, the new genus is closely related to the genera Gamergus Stål, 1859 and Gamergomorphus Melichar, 1906 from southern Africa. The latter is also characterized by stenoptery (Melichar 1906), but less so than the new genus.

  • Figs 1–4.

    Afroelfus bothryogaster gen. et sp. n., holotype: (1) dorsal view; (2) lateral view; (3) frontal view; (4) ovipositor, lateral view.

    f01_637.jpg

    Afroelfus bothryogaster sp. n.
    Figs 15, 9–12

  • Etymology: From the Greek βóθρΟ;ς; (hollow) and γαστńρ (belly).

  • Description:

    Metope yellowish brown. Postclypeus black, except for light yellow markings near metopoclypeal suture; anteclypeus black. Rostrum dark brown. Scape and pedicel yellowish light brown. Genae, coryphe, pro- and mesonotum light yellow. Metanotum yellowish dark brown. Paranotal lobes black. Episterna and epimera dark brown or black except for yellow vertical stripe on mesoepimera. Forewings dark brown with yellow marginal spots and yellow clavus with dark brown margin. Hind coxae yellowish brown. Femora dark brown or black. Tibiae and tarsi dark brown except for yellowish brown first and second metatarsomeres. Apices of spines black. Abdominal tergites I-II light yellowish white except for black or dark brown medial parts (Fig. 1). Abdominal tergites III-VII black, each with light brown spots combined in two lateral stripes and with brown patches on hind margins (Figs 1, 2). Abdominal sternites black except for light yellow areas around sensory pits (Fig. 5). Pygofer brown, with dark brown semicircular processes. Anal tube black, with yellowish hind margin. Gonoplacs brown or dark brown. Gonocoxa VIII dark brown or black.

  • Body length 4.0 mm, forewing length 6.5 mm.

  • Holotype: ♀ SOUTH AFRICA: Northern Cape: Cosy Mountain, Kamieskroon (30°11′S 17°56′E), 830 m, 16.x.2007, J. Deckert, at light (SAMC).

  • Fig. 5.

    Afroelfus bothryogaster gen. et sp. n., holotype, abdomen in ventral view.

    f05_637.jpg

    Fig. 6.

    Alleloplasis darwini Waterhouse, female (Albany, Western Australia), lateral view.

    f06_637.jpg

    DISCUSSION

    It is safe to say that the narrow fore wings and presence of sternal sensory pits in the imago are convergent features rather than evidence of a close relationship between Afroelfus gen. n. and Alleloplasis Waterhouse. The new genus differs from the latter as follows: rows of sensory pits present on sternites III–VI medially (Fig. 5) (sensory pits are situated on sternite IV medially and on sternites V–VI laterally in Alleloplasis, Fig. 6); coryphe very transverse and narrow (rather elongate and wide in Alleloplasis); pedicel nearly globular (cylindrical elongate in Alleloplasis). It is doubtful whether the two genera belong to the same tribe. However, similar trends in morphological modifications in both genera is a display of the law of homologous series in variation proposed by the Russian geneticist and botanist Nikolay I. Vavilov (1920, 1922): “closely related species and genera are characterized by similar homologous series in their genetic variability” (Kupzow 1975).

    According to Emeljanov (1980, 2001), sensory pits are strictly of tergal origin and their presence on the sternites is a result of metatopy, i.e. removal of some structures from one place to another (Emeljanov 1987, 2000). All taxa with sternal sensory pits in the imagos mentioned above inhabit arid biotopes (Doering 1938; Fennah 1949; Gnezdilov & O'Brien 2006; Gnezdilov & Wilson 2007; Fletcher 2009). Alleloplasis darwini Waterhouse, the type species of the genus Alleloplasis, was described on the basis of the specimen that had been collected by Charles Darwin by “sweeping in coarse grass and brushwood” in King George's Sound on the southern coast of Western Australia (Waterhouse 1839). Afroelfus gen. n. is known from the succulent Karoo biome (Figs 7, 8; J. Deckert pers. comm.) in a region of South Africa that is close to the Namibian border. As Ŝulc (1928) and later Liebenberg (1956) suggested that sensory pits probably are used as receptors for atmospheric humidity, the presence of sensory pits on abdominal sternites in the imago might be associated with a kind of adaptation to dry habitats.

    Figs 7, 8.

    Kamieskroon, type locality of Afroelfus bothryogaster gen. et sp. n. (Photos by J. Deckert)

    f07_637.jpg

    Figs 9–12.

    Afroelfus bothryogaster gen. et sp. n., holotype: (9) fore wing (scale bar = 1 mm); (10) head, pro-, and mesonotum, dorsal view (scale bar = 0.5 mm); (11) head, frontal view (scale bar = 0.5 mm); (12) anal tube and pygofer, dorsal view (scale bar = 0.1mm).

    f09_637.jpg

    Within Gaetuliini, except for the already mentioned Alleloplasis Waterhouse, Gamergomorphus Melichar, and Afroelfus gen. n., stenoptery is also character of the genus Danepteryx Uhler with six species from southern USA (Doering 1940). Another stenopterous tropiduchid, Teramnon stenopteryx Fennah, 1969 from New Caledonia (Fennah 1969), belongs to the tribe Neommatissini Fennah, 1982. Generally, flightlessness may be explained as a response to three types of selective pressure (Hackman 1964; Fennah 1967; Kerzhner 1981; Bickel 2006): adaptation to cold or windy climate, life in forest litter or in low dense/sparse vegetation, and parasitism. To these, mimicry should be added. The type locality of Afroelfus bothryogaster gen. et sp. n. is a very windy, dry place, with succulent Karoo vegetation (J. Deckert pers. comm.). Thus, we can assume that wing reduction in the new species took place under the influence of a windy climate and living in specific succulent vegetation. Stenoptery and the convex abdomen make Alleloplasis spp. similar to wasps. Afroelfus gen. n., in contrast, has a robust abdomen. Another possible reason for the narrow wings may be mimicry of the antennae of any other insect as was proposed by Emeljanov (2009) for larval wax nails on the apex of the abdomen in the lophopid species Maana emeljanovi Soulier-Perkins, Bourgoin & Riedel, 2006. In the case ofAfroelfus, the stenopterous species mimics the head on its abdomen.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    I am glad to thank Dr Jürgen Deckert (Berlin, Germany) and Mr J.J. Matyorauta from the Northern Cape Nature Conservation Service (Republic of South Africa) for the opportunity to study the specimen as well as providing the ecological data for the type locality; Mr Volker Lohrmann (Berlin, Germany) for his help with taking pictures of the specimen; Prof. Dr Hannelore Hoch (Berlin, Germany) for her hospitality in the Museum für Naturkunde; Mr Mick Webb (London, UK) and Dr Mike Wilson (Cardiff, UK) for the opportunity to study Alleloplasis spp. and general support; Prof. Alexandr F. Emeljanov (St Petersburg, Russia) for his useful comments on the manuscript and discussion; and Prof. Dr Thierry Bourgoin (Paris, France) and an anonymous referee for their reviews of the manuscript and valuable comments. The study was financially supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung (Bonn, Germany), the Royal Society (London, UK), and the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (project Nfi01_637.jpg 16.518.11.7070).

    REFERENCES

    1.

    G.A. Anufriev & A.F. Emeljanov 1988. Suborder Cicadinea (Auchenorrhyncha). In : P.A. Ler , ed., Keys to the insects of the Far East of the USSR [Opredelitel’ nasekomykh Dal'nego Vostoka SSSR]. Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 12–495. (in Russian) Google Scholar

    2.

    D.J. Bickel 2006. Papallacta (Diptera: Dolichopodidae), a new stenopterous genus from the páramo of Ecuador. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 149 (2): 209–213. Google Scholar

    3.

    K.C. Doering 1938. A contribution to the taxonomy of the subfamily Issinae in America North of Mexico (Fulgoridae, Homoptera). Part II. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 25 (20): 447–575. Google Scholar

    4.

    K.C. Doering 1940 (1939). A contribution to the taxonomy of the subfamily Issinae in America North of Mexico (Fulgoridae, Homoptera). Part III. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 26 (2): 83–167. Google Scholar

    5.

    A.F. Emeljanov 1980. Phylogeny and evolution of planthoppers of the subfamily Orgeriinae (Homoptera, Dictyopharidae). Meetings in memory of N.A. Cholodkovsky [Chteniya pamyati N.A. Kholodkovskogo]. Vol. 32. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 1–96. (in Russian) Google Scholar

    6.

    A.F. Emeljanov 1987. Phylogeny of Cicadina (Homoptera) on comparative morphological data. Transactions of the All-Russian Entomological Society [Trudy Vserossyskogo entomologicheskogo obschestva] 69: 19–109. (in Russian) Google Scholar

    7.

    A.F. Emeljanov 1995. On the problem of classification and phylogeny of the family Delphacidae (Homoptera, Cicadina) taking into consideration larval characters. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 74 (4): 780–794. (in Russian, English translation published in Entomological Review 75 (9): 134–150.) Google Scholar

    8.

    A.F. Emeljanov 2000. Some macroevolutional modes, concerned with repeated and new use of once acquired structures. Theoretical problems of ecology and evolution. Third Meeting in memory of A.A. Lyubishchev [Tret'i Lyubishchevskie chteniya]. Tol'yatti: Institute of Volga Basin RAS, pp. 60–64. (in Russian) Google Scholar

    9.

    A.F. Emeljanov 2001. Larval characters and their ontogenetic development in Fulgoroidea (Homoptera, Cicadina). Zoosystematica Rossica 9 (1): 101–121. Google Scholar

    10.

    A.F. Emeljanov 2009. Evolutionary transformations of abdominal wax-plates in the larvae of the Fulgoroidea (Homoptera, Cicadina). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 88 (4): 745–768. (in Russian, English translation published in Entomological Review 89 (9): 1035–1054.) Google Scholar

    11.

    R.G. Fennah 1949. New exotic Fulgoroidea. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Series 12) 2: 585–606. Google Scholar

    12.

    R.G. Fennah 1967. New and little known Fulgoroidea from South Africa (Homoptera). Annals of the Natal Museum 18 (3): 655–714. Google Scholar

    13.

    R.G. Fennah 1969. Fulgoroidea (Homoptera) from New Caledonia and the Loyalty Islands. Pacific Insects Monograph 21: 1–116. Google Scholar

    14.

    R.G. Fennah 1982. A tribal classification of the Tropiduchidae (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea), with the description of a new species on tea in Malaysia. Bulletin of Entomological Research 72 (4): 631–643. Google Scholar

    15.

    M.J. Fletcher 2009. Identification keys and checklists for the leafhoppers, planthoppers and their relatives occurring in Australia and neighbouring areas (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha).  http://www1.dpi.nsw.gov.au/keys/fulgor/tropid/allelopl.htm (accessed 25/05/2011). Google Scholar

    16.

    V.M. Gnezdilov 2007. On the systematic positions of the Bladinini Kirkaldy, Tonginae Kirkaldy, and Trienopinae Fennah (Homoptera, Fulgoroidea). Zoosystematica Rossica 15 (2): 293–297. Google Scholar

    17.

    V.M. Gnezdilov & L.B. O'Brien 2006. Generic changes in United States Issini (Hemiptera, Fulgoroidea, Issidae). Insecta Mundi 20 (3–4): 217–225. Google Scholar

    18.

    V.M. Gnezdilov & M.R. Wilson 2007. A new genus and a new species of the tribe Mithymnini (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Nogodinidae) from Namibia, with sternal sensory pits in the adult. Zootaxa 1453: 55–62. Google Scholar

    19.

    W. Hackman 1964. On reduction and loss of wings in Diptera. Notulae Entomologicae 44 (3): 73–93. Google Scholar

    20.

    I.M. Kerzhner 1981. Heteroptera of the family Nabidae. Fauna of the USSR. Rhynchota [Fauna SSSR. Nasekomye khobotnye]. Vol. 13, part 2. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 1–326. (in Russian) Google Scholar

    21.

    A.J. Kupzow 1975. Vavilov's law of homologous series at the fiftieth anniversary of its formulation. Economic Botany 29 (4): 372–379. Google Scholar

    22.

    K. Liebenberg 1956. Die Borstengruben — ein wenig bekanntes larvales Haarsinnesorgan von Calligypona pellucida F. (Homoptera Cicadina). Zoologische Beiträge (N. F.) 1 (2): 441–446. Google Scholar

    23.

    L. Melichar 1906. Monographie der Issiden (Homoptera). Abhandlungen der K. K. zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 3 (4): 1–327. Google Scholar

    24.

    A. Stroiński & V.M. Gnezdilov 2009. Redescription of Busas dissolutus Jacobi, 1909, with notes on taxonomic position of the genus (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Tropiduchidae). Annales Zoologici (Warszawa) 59 (4): 459–464. Google Scholar

    25.

    K. Sulc 1928. Voskové žlázy a jejich yýrobky u larev sbf. Cixiinae (Homoptera). Biologické Spisy Vysoké Školy Zvěrolékařské Brno, CSR 7: 1–32. Google Scholar

    26.

    J. Szwedo & A. Stroiński 2010. Austrini - a new tribe of Tropiduchidae planthoppers from the Eocene Baltic amber (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N. S.) 46 (1–2): 132–137. Google Scholar

    27.

    N.I. Vavilov 1920. The law of homologous series in variation. Third All-Russian congress for plant-breeding, 4th June 1920 [Tretiy Vserossiysky selektsionny s'ezd, 4th iyunya 1920]. Saratov: Gubpoligraphotdel, pp. 1–16. (in Russian) Google Scholar

    28.

    N.I. Vavilov 1922. The law of homologous series in variation. Journal of Genetics 12 (1): 47–89. Google Scholar

    29.

    G.R. Waterhouse 1839. Descriptions of some new species of exotic insects. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 2: 188–196. Google Scholar
    Vladimir M. Gnezdilov "A New Stenopterous Genus of the Tribe Gaetuliini Fennah (Hemiptera, Fulgoroidea, Tropiduchidae) from Southern Africa — Particular Intercontinental Convergence," African Invertebrates 53(2), 637-644, (1 December 2012). https://doi.org/10.5733/afin.053.0203
    Published: 1 December 2012
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    8 PAGES


    Share
    SHARE
    KEYWORDS
    Adaptation
    convergence
    Fulgoroidea
    Hemiptera
    new species
    southern Africa
    stenoptery
    RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
    Get copyright permission
    Back to Top