Spilopsyllus inaequalis inaequalis and Spilopsyllus inaequalis interrupta are common ectoparasites of species of Leporidae. Kohls (1940) suggested that there are intergrades of these subspecies in sympatric areas of southeastern Washington and Oregon, south central Idaho, and Utah. Kohl's conclusions were based on traditional morphological features of the “clasper” (basimere and telomere) and chaetotaxy of the outer surface of the hind tibia. These morphological features, and that of the aedeagus, have never been critically studied until now. The aedeagi of both taxa were examined and several consistent structures separate these closely allied species. The median dorsal lobe and apex of the sclerotized inner tube show little variation, although they are distinctly different among the sympatric populations and are consistent in peripheral populations. These characters are stable with little variation and their structure appears to be sufficiently different to potentially inhibit interbreeding that typically occurs where subspecies meet. These characters are valid distinguishing characters even when males of both species occur simultaneously on the same host. These newly reognized static characters of the aedeagus are illustrated. The lateral surface of the hind tibia is the most valid criterion for separation of females of the two species, although this cannot be determined with any degree of certainty. Spilopsyllus inaequalis interrupta is herein elevated to full specific status (Spilopsyllus interruptus) (Amended Status). Table 1 provides a resource for the terminology of various lobes and processes of the telomeric appendages of males of the superfamily Pulicoidea. Host and distribution records available in the literature are summarized in Tables 2 and 3.

An accumulation of fleas that constitute the Hastriter flea collection includes accounts/records of 167 species over 48 years. These officially belong to the Brigham Young University flea collection. They are summarized in this treatise with identifications of new state, county, and provicincial records from the United States, Canada, and some species that extend south into México. Records included are represented by eight families that are presented in alphabetical order (Ceratophyllidae, Ctenopthalmidae, Hystrichopsyllidae, Ischnopsyllidae, Leptopsyllidae, Pulicidae, Rhopalopsyllidae, and Vermipsyllidae). Major synonomies are provided with each species (excluding very common and cosmopolitan species) with major political subdivisions following each reference/pagination. Two appendices are included that list important references (not included in synonomies) (Appendix I) and a listing of synonyms for the family Ceratophyllidae (Appendix II). Four tables are included that list new geographical records and one table that notes new host records. Seventy-eight flea species (some of the same species were new for different state, county and provincial records) accounted for 129 new U.S. state or Canadian provincial records. These also included 12 new state records. An additional 15 new host records for 13 different flea species were documented. To aid future investigations, significant research findings such as disease investigations, zoonotic disease control measures, seasonal bionomics, et cetera are annotated in the remarks.