Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2002 Individual Variation in the Duration of Territory Occupation by Males of the Dragonfly Perithemis tenera (Odonata: Libellulidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In the dragonfly Perithemis tenera Say, males defend territories around oviposition sites and defense of a site is critical for reproductive success. This study first demonstrated that individual males varied consistently in how long they defended a particular territory within a day (their “tenure”) and in the quality of the sites they defended. I then investigated a number of factors that may have affected territory tenure and may have led to the observed variation among males. Territory occupations that ended “voluntarily” were significantly longer than those that ended because the male was evicted from his territory. For voluntary desertions, tenure duration was unrelated to age, wing length, the amount of time the male fought that day, or site quality. However, tenure durations were longer for males that arrived earlier in the day than for those that arrived later, and consistent differences existed among males in arrival time. Furthermore, tenure durations were longer when males had successfully mated than when they did not mate; available evidence suggests that this pattern may be because mating success causes them to stay longer. Thus, the results suggest that the problem of explaining tenure duration in P. tenera can be largely broken down into identifying factors that affect a male’s likelihood of being evicted and his relative arrival time. Overall, males that defended better sites and males that had longer wings were territorial for fewer total days. Of these two factors, site quality seems to have a larger effect than wing length on the number of days, suggesting that males may incur an increased cost by defending sites that are more attractive to other males.

Paul V. Switzer "Individual Variation in the Duration of Territory Occupation by Males of the Dragonfly Perithemis tenera (Odonata: Libellulidae)," Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95(5), 628-636, (1 September 2002). https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0628:IVITDO]2.0.CO;2
Received: 31 July 2001; Accepted: 1 April 2002; Published: 1 September 2002
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top