Translator Disclaimer
7 November 2013 Development and Evaluation of Microsatellite Markers for a Native Prairie Perennial, Echinacea angustifolia (Asteraceae)
Author Affiliations +

The North American tallgrass prairie is highly fragmented, with less than 1% of the presettlement prairie in existence (Samson and Knopf, 1994). Due to this fragmentation and habitat destruction, native prairie plant populations could be suffering from a number of genetic consequences such as inbreeding depression, genetic drift, and reduced gene flow between fragmented populations (Young et al., 1996). Information on the population genetic structure and pollination patterns within these fragmented prairie plant remnants would help land managers determine conservation priorities and could be instrumental toward ensuring the population persistence of prairies.

Echinacea angustifolia DC. (Asteraceae) has characteristics that are common to many herbaceous prairie plants; it is long-lived, self-incompatible, and insect pollinated by a number of solitary bees (Wagenius and Lyon, 2010). Because of these characteristics, E. angustifolia has become a model prairie plant and has been used in a number of studies to assess the genetic and ecological consequences of prairie fragmentation (e.g., Wagenius, 2006; Wagenius and Lyon, 2010). Researchers have annual demographic data on plants from 27 E. angustifolia remnants in western Minnesota. In this study, we developed and evaluated 11 E. angustifolia microsatellite markers for use in population genetic and paternity studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We developed microsatellites for E. angustifolia using an enrichment protocol that prescreens for microsatellite repeats before ligating into a vector (Glenn and Schable, 2005). Approximately 10 µg of DNA from an E. angustifolia individual was cut with an RsaI restriction enzyme. Double-stranded linkers were added to the ends of the DNA fragments to provide primer binding sites in future PCRs and to assist with ligating the fragment into a vector.

We prescreened for trinucleotide microsatellite regions using Dynabeads magnetic beads (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York, USA) with a microsatellite oligonucleotide attached, either (AAG)8, (AAC)6, (AAT)12, (ACT)12, (ATC)8, or (AGC)6. The resulting fragments were ligated into a vector and cloned. We sequenced the clones on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Life Technologies) using Sanger sequencing. The development process resulted in sequences for 50 trinucleotide microsatellite regions ranging from six to 18 repeats.

We developed primers for all 50 microsatellite regions using Primer3 version 0.4.0 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 2000). The criteria inputted into Primer3 were optimal primer size of 20 bp (minimum 18 bp, maximum 27 bp); CG content of primer between 20% and 80%; optimal primer melting temperature of 60°C (minimum 57°C, maximum 63°C); a maximum self-complementarity score of 8; and a maximum 3′ self-complementarity score of 3. Of the 50 microsatellite regions, 20 loci were variable and had consistent amplification following optimization. We tested these 20 loci for allelic diversity, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), and repeatability; 11 performed well (Tables 1 and 2). None of these 11 loci showed evidence of null alleles (tested using MICRO-CHECKER version 2.2.3; van Oosterhout et al., 2004). Two loci were amplified by the same primer pair (Ech13 and Ech13Z) but had nonoverlapping alleles and were not linked (tested using FSTAT version 1.2; Goudet, 1995). These loci potentially represent a duplicated region in the genome with an insertion in one of the regions.

We collected and dried leaves (82 total) from adult E. angustifolia plants that were collected as seed in rural western Minnesota, USA, from three remnant populations: Staffanson Prairie Preserve (SPP; 45°48′58.09″N, 95°44′53.78″W), Landfill (LF; 45°50′17.99″N, 95°45′15.57″W), and Steven's Approach (SAP; 45°49′36.10″N, 95°40′11.75″W). A representative voucher has been deposited at the Chicago Botanic Garden's Nancy Poole Rich Herbarium. The three remnant populations were between 2.5 km and 6.7 km apart and varied in mean number of flowering plants per year from 25 to 2961 (Table 2). We extracted DNA from the leaf samples using either a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Chaudhry et al., 1999) or a QIAGEN DNeasy Plant Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA).

TABLE 1.

Characterization of 11 microsatellite loci in Echinacea angustifolia.

t01_01.gif

For eight loci (all but Ech03, Ech07, and Ech28), the PCR was conducted in 10-µL PCR volumes containing 10 ng of template DNA, 0.25 µm of tagged forward primer (labeled with WellRED fluorescent dye; D2, D3, or D4 [Sigma-Aldich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA]), 0.25 µm of reverse primer, 5 µL PCR MasterMix 2× (50 U/mL Taq DNA polymerase in a proprietary reaction buffer [pH 8.5], 400 µM of each dNTP, and 3 mM MgCl2 [Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA]), and 5 µg/µL of bovine serum albumin (BSA); an additional 0.25 mM MgCl2 was added to primer Ech37. The PCR profile consisted of an initial 3-min denaturing step at 94°C followed by 35 cycles of a 30-s denaturing step at 94°C, a 30-s annealing step, and a 1-min elongation step at 72°C, followed by a final 10-min elongation step at 72°C (Table 1). For the remaining three loci (Ech03, Ech07, and Ech28), an M13 sequence tail (5′-CACGACGTTGTAAAACGAC) was added to the forward primer. The tail was also attached to a fluorescent label (for methods see Boutin-Ganache et al., 2001). Two sequential PCRs were conducted with a final 15-µL PCR volume. The first PCR had the same reaction recipe and profile as the other eight primers except that it only consisted of 13 cycles. For the second PCR, an additional 2.5 µL of PCR MasterMix 2×, 2.5 µg/µL of BSA, 0.125 mM MgCl2, and 2 µL of water were added to the product from the first run. In addition, 0.25 µm of tagged M13 primer (fluorescently labeled) was added to the reaction. The second PCR had the same profile as the first PCR but consisted of 27 cycles and used an annealing temperature of 55°C for all three primers. Amplified products were analyzed on a Beckman Coulter CEQ 8000 Genetic Analysis System version 9.0 (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA).

TABLE 2.

Summary information for 11 microsatellite loci in three Echinacea angustifolia populations.a

t02_01.gif

The 11 microsatellite loci have between three and 14 alleles (Table 2). For each of the three populations, we calculated the number of alleles per locus, observed and expected heterozygosities, and deviation from HWE using GenAlEx version 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012; Table 2). The observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.366 to 0.955 (mean = 0.673, SE ± 0.26), while the expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.375 to 0.845 (mean = 0.670, SE ± 0.023). The samples from the largest population (SPP N = 41) were used to evaluate the loci's informative power for paternity studies. The polymorphic information content (PIC), nonexclusion probability for identity, first and second parents, and parent pairs were calculated using CERVUS 3.0 (Kalinowski et al., 2007; Appendix 1). The combined paternity exclusion probability across all loci was 0.9994.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we developed and evaluated 11 microsatellite markers for a native prairie plant, E. angustifolia. We demonstrated that the markers are polymorphic across three populations of varying sizes and in HWE. The markers also have a high paternity exclusion probability and should be informative in paternity assignment-based pollination studies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first set of primers for a herbaceous tallgrass prairie perennial. We believe that these primers will provide researchers and land managers with vital information on the genetic consequences of prairie fragmentation, including assessment of genetic variability, genetic differentiation, and pollination patterns within and among remnant populations.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

I. Boutin-Ganache , M. Raposo , M. Raymond , and C. F. Deschepper . 2001. M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-sizing methods. BioTechniques 31: 24–28. Google Scholar

2.

B. Chaudhry , A. Yasmin , T. Husnain , and S. Riazuddin . 1999. Mini-scale genomic DNA extraction from cotton. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 17: 280. Google Scholar

3.

T. C. Glenn , and N. A. Schable . 2005. Isolating microsatellite DNA loci. In E. A. Zimmer and E. H. Roalson [eds.], Methods in enzymology, vol. 395, Molecular evolution: Producing the biochemical data, Part B, 202–222. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. Google Scholar

4.

J. Goudet 1995. FSTAT (version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86: 485–486. Google Scholar

5.

S. T. Kalinowski , M. L. Taper , and T. C. Marshall . 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16: 1099–1106. Google Scholar

6.

R. Peakall , and P. E. Smouse . 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research: An update. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28: 2537–2539. Google Scholar

7.

S. Rozen , and H. J. Skaletsky . 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Krawetz and S. Misener [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

8.

F. Samson , and F. Knopf . 1994. Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44: 418–442. Google Scholar

9.

C. Van Oosterhout , W. F. Hutchinson , P. M. Wills , and P. Shipley . 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535–538. Google Scholar

10.

S. Wagenius 2006. Scale dependence of reproductive failure in fragmented Echinacea populations. Ecology 87: 931–941. Google Scholar

11.

S. Wagenius , and S. P. Lyon . 2010. Reproduction of Echinacea angustifolia in fragmented prairie is pollen-limited but not pollinator-limited. Ecology 91: 733–742. Google Scholar

12.

A. Young , T. Boyle , and T. Brown . 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11: 413–418. Google Scholar

Appendices

APPENDIX 1.

Informative power for paternity studies of 11 Echinacea angustifolia microsatellite loci. Samples were taken from the Staffanson Prairie Preserve (SPP) population (N = 41).

tA01_01.gif

Notes

[1] We would like to thank K. Feldheim of the Pritzker Laboratory, Field Museum of Natural History, for guidance and assistance in developing the microsatellite markers. This work was completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree (to J.L.I.) from the Graduate College, University of Illinois at Chicago.

Jennifer L. Ison, Stuart Wagenius, Diedre Reitz, and Mary V. Ashley "Development and Evaluation of Microsatellite Markers for a Native Prairie Perennial, Echinacea angustifolia (Asteraceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 1(11), (7 November 2013). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1300049
Received: 3 June 2013; Accepted: 1 July 2013; Published: 7 November 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top