Translator Disclaimer
7 May 2013 Microsatellite Markers for Cariniana legalis (Lecythidaceae) and Their Transferability to C. estrellensis
Author Affiliations +

Cariniana Casar. (Lecythidaceae) is a genus of trees native to South America, and many of these tree species are harvested for timber. Cariniana legalis (Mart.) Kuntze and C. estrellensis (Raddi) Kuntze are two endangered tropical trees with winddispersed seeds that are pollinated by bees (Carvalho, 1994). These species are endemic to the Atlantic Forest in Brazil and have a low population density (less than 1 tree/ha). However, the Atlantic Forest has become increasingly fragmented in recent centuries, and today just 12–16% of the original forest remains (Ribeiro et al., 2009). Forest fragmentation isolates and decreases the natural populations of these trees. These changes affect gene flow among populations and can increase the selfing rate, correlated matings, genetic structure, and the relatedness in subsequent generations (Jump and Penuelas, 2006; O'Connell et al., 2006). Recent advances in molecular techniques, such as microsatellite markers, have created new opportunities for conservation research that can be used to minimize the negative implications of population fragmentation. Here, we describe the development of 12 nuclear microsatellite markers for C. legalis and the transferability of these markers for studying C. estrellensis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaves collected from a single C. legalis tree using the protocol proposed by Doyle and Doyle (1987). A microsatellite-enriched genomic library was constructed following the protocol of Billotte et al. (1999). The Rsa I enzyme (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) was used to digest genomic DNA from one genotype of C. legalis, enriched in microsatellite fragments using (CT)8 and (GT)8 motifs. These enriched fragments were cloned into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), and ligation products were used to transform Epicurian Coli XL1-Blue Escherichia coli-competent cells (Stratagene, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA). Transformed cells were cultivated on agar plates containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin, 50 µg/mL X-galactosidase, and isopropyl β- D -1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Single white colonies were selected and stored at -80°C. A total of 96 recombinant colonies were obtained and sequenced using the adapters Rsa 21 (5′-CTCTTGCTTACGCGTGGACTA-3′) and Rsa 25 (5′-TAGTCCACGCGTAAGCAAGAGCACA-3′) in a 3730×1 DNA Analyzer sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) using the BigDye Terminator version 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). Ninety-six positive clones from the library were sequenced, and the microsatellites were found in 82 of them. Dinucleotide motifs were the most abundant, followed by mono-, terra-, tri-, and hexanucleotide motifs (approximately 75.6%, 14.6%, 5%, 2.4%, and 2.4%, respectively); pentanucleotide motifs were not found. Only 13 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were selected for primer design because their sequences presented more than five tandem repeats. Vector segments were removed from each of the sequences by VecScreen ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/VecScreen/VecScreen.html). Thirteen pairs of primers were designed for SSR flanking regions using Primer3Plus (Untergasser et al., 2007) according to the following criteria: annealing temperature ranging from 52–60°C and GC content between 40% and 60%. Each primer pair was designed to amplify a fragment ranging between 150 and 300 bp. Microsatellite loci were amplified by PCR in a final volume of 15 µL using GoTaq Colorless Master Mix (Promega Corporation) containing 7.5 µL GoTaq Colorless Master Mix (2×), 10 µM of each primer (F and R), 3.0 µL Nuclease-Free Water, and 7.5 ng template DNA. The amplification program for all primers consisted of an initial denaturing step at 94°C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles of amplification (94°C for 1 min, followed by 1 min at the specific annealing temperature of each primer pair [Table 1], 72°C for 1 min), and a final elongation step at 72°C for 10 min. Amplifications were performed with a Mastercycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Thirteen pairs of primers were designed, but only 12 yielded successfully amplified fragments. The Cle 13 locus did not amplify despite using a considerable range of temperatures (40–65°C). The amplification products (2 µL of the total reaction volume) were separated on a Fragment Analyzer Automated CE System (Advanced Analytical Technologies [AATI], Ames, Iowa, USA) using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Reagent Kit, 35–500 bp (Invitrogen). Raw data were analyzed using PROSize version 2.0 software (AATI).

TABLE 1.

Microsatellite primers developed in Cariniana legalis. a

t01_10.gif

TABLE 2.

Results of initial primer screening in two populations of Cariniana legalis (Ibicatu and Mogi-Guaçu) and one population of C. estrellensis (Ibicatu) from São Paulo, Brazil.

t02_10.gif

We sampled a total of 51 adult C. legalis trees from two populations (25 from Floresta Estadual de Ibicatu and 26 from Floresta Estadual de Mogi-Guaçu) and 26 adult C. estrellensis trees from Floresta Estadual de Ibicatu in São Paulo State, Brazil (Appendix 1). Genetic diversity, fixation index (F), and linkage disequilibrium were estimated for each species using the FSTAT program (Goudet, 2002). To test if F was significantly different from zero and to test linkage disequilibrium, we used 1000 Monte Carlo permutations (alleles among individuals) and a Bonferroni correction (95%, α= 0.05). As noted above, of the 13 tested primers in both species, one (Cle13) showed no amplification (Table 1). The other 12 loci worked well for both species (Table 2). For C. legalis, 100 alleles were found (ranging among loci from two to 14, with an average of 8.3) from Ibicatu, and 112 alleles were found from Mogi-Guaçu (ranging among loci from two to 15, with an average of 9.3). For C. estrellensis, we identified 103 alleles (ranging from three to 12, with an average of 8.6) (Table 2). For C. legalis, the observed (H o) and expected (H e) heterozygosities ranged from 0 to 0.99 and from 0.22 to 0.90, respectively, for Ibicatu and from 0 to 0.96 and from 0.07 to 0.90, respectively, for Mogi-Guaçu. For C. estrellensis, H oand H eranged from 0 to 0.96 and from 0.14 to 0.91, respectively. Following Bonferroni correction, F was significantly different from zero for three loci of C. legalis from Mogi-Guaçu and four loci and means over loci from Ibicatu. In C. estrellensis, significant F values were observed in eight loci and means over loci (Table 2). After Bonferroni correction, no linkage disequilibrium was detected in the studied populations. Of the 13 loci developed, only Cle 11 and Cle 13 were not useful due to low polymorphism and lack of amplification, respectively. The remaining 11 loci are suitable for studying genetic diversity and structure, mating system, gene flow, and parentage analysis in both species.

CONCLUSIONS

The microsatellite loci showed high levels of polymorphism in both C. legalis and C. estrellensis. Our data suggest that the microsatellite markers developed in this study are suitable for population genetic studies in both Cariniana species. We are currently using these markers for inferring genetic diversity, spatial genetic structure, and gene flow in C. legalis. These studies will produce valuable information for managing fragmented populations, including information for breeding, conservation, and reforestation plans.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. N. Billotte , P. J. L. Lagoda , A. M. Risterucci , and F. C. Baurens . 1999. Microsatellite-enriched libraries: Applied methodology for the development of SSR markers in tropical crops. Fruits 54: 277–288. Google Scholar
  2. P. E. R. Carvalho 1994. Espécies Florestais Brasileiras: Recomendações silviculturais, potencialidades e uso da madeira. EMBRAPA-CNPF, Brasilia, Brazil. Google Scholar
  3. J. J. Doyle , and J. L. Doyle . 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemistry 19: 11–15. Google Scholar
  4. J. Goudet 2002. FSTAT version 2.9.3.2, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. Institute of Ecology, Lausanne, Switzerland. Website  http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm [accessed 20 August 2012]. Google Scholar
  5. A. S. Jump , and J. Penuelas . 2006. Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation in a wind-pollinated tree. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 8096–8100. Google Scholar
  6. K. M. O'Connell , A. Mosseler , and O. P. Rajora . 2006. Impacts of forest fragmentation on the mating system and genetic diversity of white spruce (Picea glauca) at the landscape level. Heredity 97: 418–426. Google Scholar
  7. M. C. Ribeiro , J. P. Metzger , A. C. Martensen , F. J. Ponzoni , and M. M. Hirota . 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 142: 1141–1153. Google Scholar
  8. A. Untergasser , H. Nijveen , X. Rao , T. Bisseling , R. Geurts , and J. A. M. Leunissen . 2007. Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Research 35(Supplement 2): W71–W74. Google Scholar

Appendices

APPENDIX 1.

List of vouchers of Cariniana legalis and C. estrellensis used in this paper. Vouchers are deposited in the Herbarium of the Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (ESA).

tA01_10.gif

Notes

[1] This research was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da São Paulo (FAPESP; 2010/10704-7) and by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; 470491/2010-8). The authors would like to thank FAPESP for financial support provided to E.V.T. (scholarship no. 2010/12354-3) and CNPq for financial support to A.M.S. and R.V.

Evandro Vagner Tambarussi, Alexandre Magno Sebbenn, Maria Andréia Moreno, Elza Martins Ferraz, Paulo Yoshio Kageyama and Roland Vencovsky "Microsatellite Markers for Cariniana legalis (Lecythidaceae) and Their Transferability to C. estrellensis," Applications in Plant Sciences 1(6), (7 May 2013). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1200493
Received: 17 September 2012; Accepted: 1 November 2012; Published: 7 May 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top