Translator Disclaimer
9 March 2015 New Microsatellite Markers for Campanula pyramidalis (Campanulaceae) and Cross-Amplification in Closely Related Species
Author Affiliations +

The Campanula pyramidalis L. species complex (Campanulaceae) is naturally distributed across the Balkan Peninsula and in a small part of the southern Apennines. It is also established in horticulture worldwide. This species complex is usually found in rocky habitats with specific edaphic and microclimatic conditions. Although 21 taxa have been described within the C. pyramidalis complex, only three species have been generally accepted: C. pyramidalis, C. versicolor Sibth. & Sm., and C. secundiflora Vis. & Pančić (Fedorov and Kovanda, 1976; Lammers, 2007; Lakušić et al., 2013). All these taxa have narrow geographic distributions and form phylogenetically closely related groups (Park et al., 2006; Liber et al., 2008; Lakušić et al., 2013).

To elucidate the complicated relationships within this species complex, a broad molecular phylogenetic study based on DNA sequences was performed by Lakušić et al. (2013). Although this work led to many new insights and the description of a new species (C. austroadriatica D. Lakušić & Kovačić), the relationships and evolutionary patterns at the subspecific level remain poorly understood. Our current research focuses on expanding the sampling and developing faster-evolving molecular markers that can discriminate among and within closely related and recently diverged taxa. In accordance with these objectives, 11 new microsatellite markers were developed in the current study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total genomic DNA was isolated from 25 mg of silica-dried leaves with the GenElute Plant Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA). New microsatellites were identified and characterized from genomic DNA libraries enriched for di- and trinucleotide repeats according to Radosavljević et al. (2011, 2012). Enriched fragments containing microsatellite regions were ligated to the pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) followed by transformation of XL-10 Gold Competent Cells (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA). After overnight incubation at 37°C, white bacterial colonies were transferred into 384-well plates containing Luria–Bertani (LB) freezing media (LB broth + 13 mM KH2PO4, 6.8 mM (NH4)2SO4, 1.7 mM sodium citrate, 36 mM K2HPO4, 4.4% v/v glycerol). Libraries were transferred onto nylon membranes and screened by Southern hybridization using Cy5-labeled and Cy3-labeled 30-bp oligonucleotides with GA, GT, AGA, ACT, and ATC repeats (Eurofins MWG Operon, Huntsville, Alabama, USA). Positives were detected by scanning the blots using an Ettan DIGE Imager (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA). A total of 192 positive clones were selected from the libraries, and plasmid isolations were performed using Wizard Plus SV Minipreps (Promega Corporation). The plasmids were sequenced from both ends using T7 and SP6 universal PCR primers, BigDye chemistry, and an ABI 3130xL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Geneious 5.6.4 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand;  http://www.geneious.com/) was used to edit and assemble the sequences. Microsatellite repeats were localized using MISA Perl script (Thiel et al., 2003). PCR primers flanking the microsatellite repeats were designed for 48 sequences using Primer3 version 4.0 (Untergasser et al., 2012), with the optimum conditions set at a length of 20 bp (18–27 bp), a temperature of 60.0°C (57– 63°C), a GC content of 50% (20–80%), and a product size range of 140–210 bp.

Table 1.

Characteristics of 11 new microsatellite markers for Campanula pyramidalis.a

t01_01.gif

A preliminary study using five C. pyramidalis individuals from a natural population from Mt. Velebit (Croatia) (Appendix 1) resulted in the selection of 11 microsatellite loci (Table 1) that were polymorphic, had low levels of stutter bands, and did not yield evidence of nonspecific amplification. These 11 microsatellite loci were subsequently used in a wider analysis using 24 individuals from the same population. The sequences of microsatellite loci were deposited into GenBank (accession no. KF926847–KF926857; Table 1). PCR amplification was performed using a tailed PCR primer approach (Schuelke, 2000) that involved a two-step PCR protocol with an initial touchdown cycle (94°C for 5 min; 5 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 30 s at 60°C, which was lowered by 1°C in each cycle, and 90 s at 72°C; 25 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 90 s at 72°C; and an 8-min extension step at 72°C). The 20-µL total volume of the PCR mix contained 8 pmol each of reverse and FAM-M13(−21) primers, 2 pmol of the forward primer, 1× PCR buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1 unit TaKaRa Taq Hot Start DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Otsu, Shiga, Japan), and 5 ng of template DNA. The PCR products were genotyped on an ABI 3730xL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems) by the Macrogen DNA service (Seoul, Korea) and analyzed using GeneMapper 4.0 (Applied Biosystems).

PowerMarker 3.25 (Liu and Muse, 2005) software was used to calculate the average number of alleles per locus (A), the observed heterozygosity (Ho), and the expected heterozygosity (He) of each microsatellite locus. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and linkage disequilibrium were tested using GENEPOP 3.4 (Raymond and Rousset, 1995). Sequential Bonferroni corrections (Holm, 1979) were applied when conducting multiple statistical tests using SAS 8.02 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). Each locus was evaluated for the presence of null alleles, scoring errors, and allelic dropout using MICRO-CHECKER 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout et al., 2004).

All 11 loci were polymorphic, with an average of 7.27 alleles per locus, Ho ranging from 0.217 to 0.913, and He from 0.521 to 0.895 (Table 2). Three out of the 11 newly developed microsatellite loci (CpUZ001, CpUZ004, and CpUZ008) showed significant deviations from HWE (Table 2). Deviations from HWE may have been related to the presence of null alleles, although we found no null homozygotes. The null allele frequencies, estimated using Brookfield's formula (Brookfield, 1996), were 0.178 (CpUZ001), 0.119 (CpUZ004), and 0.267 (CpUZ008). One out of the 55 tests for linkage disequilibrium was significant (P < 0.01) after applying sequential Bonferroni corrections (CpUZ003/CpUZ009).

The 11 new microsatellite markers from C. pyramidalis were also tested on 24 individuals from natural populations of the closely related C. secundiflora and C. versicolor (Appendix 1). Seven out of the 11 microsatellite loci were successfully cross-amplified in both species (Table 2). The total number of alleles observed at each locus in C. secundiflora ranged from two to eight, the Ho from 0.136 to 0.833, and the He from 0.509 to 0.852. All loci were in accordance with HWE, and no linkage disequilibrium was detected between any pair of loci. The total number of alleles observed at each locus in C. versicolor ranged from two to six, the Ho from 0.167 to 0.625, and the He from 0.156 to 0.763. Two out of seven loci (CpUZ003 and CpUZ004) deviated from HWE. Based on the results from MICRO-CHECKER, the occurrence of null alleles was suggested for both loci at frequencies of 0.296 (CpUZ003) and 0.136 (CpUZ004). No evidence of linkage disequilibrium was detected across any pairwise comparisons except between CpUZ009 and CpUZ010.

Table 2.

Genetic properties of the 11 newly developed microsatellites in natural populations of Campanula pyramidalis, C. secundiflora, and C. versicolor.

t02_01.gif

CONCLUSIONS

The 11 new microsatellite markers developed here will be useful for studying genetic diversity and structure as well as for better assessment of the conservation status of subspecific taxa and populations of C. pyramidalis. A set of seven loci was successfully cross-amplified in C. secundiflora and C. versicolor. Because the three species are very closely related, a high level of homoplasy is not likely. We expect these seven microsatellite loci to be of great value in addressing unsolved taxonomic and biogeographic issues in the C. pyramidalis species complex.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. J. F. Y. Brookfield 1996. A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Molecular Ecology 5: 453–455. Google Scholar

  2. A. Fedorov , and M. Kovanda . 1976. Campanula. In T. G. Tutin , V. H. Heywood , N. A. Burges , D. M. Moore , D. H. Valentine , S. M. Walters , and D. A. Webb [eds.], Flora Europaea, vol. 4, 74–93. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

  3. S. Holm 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6: 65–70. Google Scholar

  4. D. Lakušić , Z. Liber , T. Nikolić , B. Surina , S. Kovačić , S. Bogdanović , and S. Stefanović . 2013. Molecular phylogeny of the Campanula pyramidalis species complex (Campanulaceae) inferred from chloroplast and nuclear non-coding sequences and its taxonomic implications. Taxon 62: 505–524. Google Scholar

  5. T. G. Lammers 2007. Campanula. In T. G. Lammers [ed.], World checklist and bibliography of Campanulaceae , 86–221. Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

  6. Z. Liber , S. Kovačić , T. Nikolić , S. Likić , and G. Rusak . 2008. Relations between western Balkan endemic Campanula L. (Campanulaceae) lineages: Evidence from chloroplast DNA. Plant Biosystems 142: 40–50. Google Scholar

  7. K. Liu , and S. V. Muse . 2005. PowerMarker: Integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 21: 2128–2129. Google Scholar

  8. J. Park , S. Kovačić , W. M. M. Eddie , Z. Liber , and G. M. Schneeweiss . 2006. Phylogeny and biogeography of isophyllous species of Campanula (Campanulaceae) in the Mediterranean area. Systematic Botany 31: 862–880. Google Scholar

  9. I. Radosavljević , J. Jakse , B. Javornik , Z. Satovic , and Z. Liber . 2011. New microsatellite markers for Salvia officinalis (Lamiaceae) and cross-amplification in closely related species. American Journal of Botany 98: e316–e318. Google Scholar

  10. I. Radosavljević , Z. Satovic , J. Jakse , B. Javornik , D. Greguraš , M. Jug-Dujaković , and Z. Liber . 2012. Development of new microsatellite markers for Salvia officinalis L. and its potential use in conservation-genetic studies of narrow endemic Salvia brachyodon Vandas. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13: 12082–12093. Google Scholar

  11. M. Raymond , and F. Rousset . 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249. Google Scholar

  12. M. Schuelke 2000. An economic method for florescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18: 233–234. Google Scholar

  13. T. Thiel , W. Michalek , R. K. Varshney , and A. Graner . 2003. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 411–422. Google Scholar

  14. A. Untergasser , I. Cutcutache , T. Koressaar , J. Ye , B. C. Faircloth , M. Remm , and S. G. Rozen . 2012. Primer3—New capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research 40: e115. Google Scholar

  15. C. van Oosterhout , W. F. Hutchinson , D. P. M. Wills , and P. Shipley . 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535–538. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Voucher information for Campanula species used in this study.

tA01_01.gif

Notes

[1] This study was supported by the Scientific Research Council of the Republic of Croatia (Project No. 119-1191193-1232 and 178-1191193-0212), by the Slovenian Research Agency Research Program (P4-0077), and by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development (Project No. 173030). The authors thank D. Lakušić (Belgrade, Serbia) for field and conceptual assistance and suggestions.

Ivan Radosavljević, Jernej Jakse, Zlatko Satovic, Branka Javornik, Ivana Janković, and Zlatko Liber "New Microsatellite Markers for Campanula pyramidalis (Campanulaceae) and Cross-Amplification in Closely Related Species," Applications in Plant Sciences 3(3), (9 March 2015). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400117
Received: 17 December 2014; Accepted: 1 February 2015; Published: 9 March 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top