Translator Disclaimer
14 July 2015 Isolation Via Next-Generation Sequencing of Microsatellites from the Tasmanian Macroalgae Lessonia corrugata (Lessoniaceae)
Author Affiliations +

Macroalgae provide habitat for many ecologically and economically important marine species, supporting highly diverse ecosystems (Wernberg et al., 2010). Lessonia (Lessoniaceae) is one such genus endemic to the Southern Hemisphere (Lane et al., 2006). Lessonia corrugata Lucas is a Tasmanian endemic, habitat-forming macroalgae found along highly exposed intertidal rocky shorelines (Edgar, 1984). Although other Lessonia species have been the focus of genetic studies (e.g., Tellier et al., 2011), only one of these employed microsatellite markers, and L. corrugata has remained relatively understudied in terms of population genetic variation.

All Lessonia species possess an alternation-of-generations life history, which is characterized by two alternating stages, a diploid macroscopic sporophyte stage (the stage of sample collection for this study) and a microscopic gametophyte haploid stage. Dispersal can occur via released gametophytes and by drifting fertile sporophytes that become detached from the substrate during storm events or through herbivory. Although the latter mode of dispersal has greater capacity for long-distance transport, Lessonia sporophytes are relatively heavy and lack flotation structures, making them unable to float for long periods of time. Their limited capacity for dispersal could mean Lessonia has difficulty recolonizing disturbed areas in comparison to other macroalgae species. This makes them suitable candidates for genetic studies on population genetics.

In the age of next-generation sequencing, microsatellites remain the most polymorphic and informative genetic marker for inferring species population genetics. Technological advances have now made microsatellite development faster and cheaper, with Ion Torrent PGM platforms proving to produce substantially more data at a faster rate and cheaper cost than other sequencing platforms (Elliott et al., 2014). Here, we use this platform to develop microsatellite markers for L. corrugata.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Genomic DNA (1 µg) was isolated from silica gel-dried tissue following the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol of Hoarau et al. (2007) with some modifications. Prior to pulverization, microcentrifuge tubes containing tissue and a ball bearing were placed in liquid nitrogen so as to ensure the tissue was sufficiently brittle. Instead of incubating and rotating samples at room temperature after the addition of CTAB buffer, samples were incubated at 55°C without rotation. Due to problems encountered with DNA quality, the resulting supernatant from centrifuging samples containing CTAB buffer and chloroform-isoamyl alcohol was first filtered through an Epoch spin column (Epoch Biolabs, Sugarland, Texas, USA) and an additional wash step was performed before eluting in Tris-HCl buffer. Throughout the process, Epoch spin columns were used instead of making silica fines.

DNA was submitted to the Australian Genome Research Facility (Brisbane node), purified using the Aurora Nucleic Acid Extraction System (Boreal Genomics, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada), and sequenced on an Ion Torrent PGM platform (Life Technologies, Mulgrave, Australia) using a 318 chip with 400-bp chemistry using standard protocols. Shearing of DNA was conducted with a Covaris S2 model (Covaris, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA) with shearing parameters slightly modified (duty cycle 10%, intensity 4100 cycles per burst, 80-s duration) to provide more DNA fragments in the 350–400-bp range. These fragments were then size selected using a Pippin Prep (Sage Science, Beverly, California, USA) to ensure the majority of fragments were greater than 300 bp and did not exceed 400 bp. Fragments were tagged by ligating with standard Ion Torrent barcode adapters. Equal molar ratios of fragments were mixed prior to sequencing. Postsequencing the fragments were demultiplexed, base called, and aligned using Torrent Suite Software, which produced 285,231 total reads, with an average read length of 147 bp. We used the program QDD v. 2 (Meglécz et al., 2010) to screen the raw sequences for eight or more di-, tetra-, or pentabase repeats, remove redundant sequences, and design primers from 16,622 possible loci (automated in QDD using Primer3 [Rozen and Skaletsky, 1999]).

Table 1.

Characteristics of 29 microsatellite loci developed in Lessonia corrugata.

t01_01.gif

We followed the procedure outlined in Gardner et al. (2011) to choose 29 loci for further development (Table 1). The loci were first trialed for PCR amplification in 20 individuals of L. corrugata using 1× MyTaq HS Mix (Bioline, Alexandria, Australia), 1 µL (20 µM) of each forward and reverse locus-specific primer, and 1–5 ng/µL DNA in 10-µL reactions. The following PCR conditions were used: 95°C for 2 min, followed by 25 cycles at 95°C for 30 s and 57°C for 4 min. PCR products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with Midori Green. All 29 loci amplified an unambiguous product of the expected size. These amplifiable loci were then tested for polymorphism via capillary electrophoresis. Of the 29 loci, seven (24%) were polymorphic and 22 (76%) were monomorphic in a panel of 20 individuals. Due to the possibility of self-fertilization in macroalgae species such as L. corrugata (Raimondi et al., 2004), we ensured testing of loci was conducted on individuals geographically separated from each other by ∼8.6 km to decrease the chances of monomorphism resulting from clones. Polymorphic loci were then scored in 76 individuals from two populations from Tasmania, Australia: Blessington Point (43°02′15.08″S, 147°24′15.49″E) and Kingston Beach (42°58′29.78″S, 147°20′15.75″E) (Table 2). Voucher specimens from Blessington Point (HO 578210) and Kingston Beach (HO 578209) were deposited in the Tasmanian Herbarium.

Table 2.

Genetic variation of the seven polymorphic loci in Lessonia corrugata.

t02_01.gif

We used MICRO-CHECKER 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout et al., 2004) to check each locus for evidence of null alleles, scoring error due to stuttering, and large allele dropout. For each locus, we calculated the number and size range of alleles, observed and expected heterozygosity, and tested conformance to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) using GenAlEx (Peakall and Smouse, 2006, 2012). Polymorphic information content was calculated using CERVUS 3.0.7 (Kalinowski et al., 2007). We also checked all pairs of loci for linkage disequilibrium in GENEPOP and adjusted for multiple tests of significance using the false discovery rate (FDR; Benjamini and Yekutieli, 2001).

Observed and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.086–0.686 (mean 0.386) and 0.082–0.67 (mean 0.398), respectively, with the number of alleles per locus ranging from two to five (mean 2.57) (Table 2). Two loci (LCO154 and LCO208) were significantly different from HWE in the Kingston Beach population but not in the Blessington Point population (Table 2). No individuals were found to be genetically identical. There was no evidence for null alleles, large allele dropout, or scoring error due to stuttering (P > 0.05) (Table 2). There was no evidence for linkage disequilibrium after adjusting for multiple tests (P > 0.05, 21 tests).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Ion Torrent platform, we identified 29 microsatellite loci, of which seven were polymorphic. Cross-amplification in 11 taxonomically accepted species in the Lessonia genus may be possible. In addition, the markers developed here will be used to document the population genetics of L. corrugata and investigate the influences of habitat patchiness on genetic structure. Understanding the processes that affect gene flow in this habitat-forming species will contribute toward conserving populations and consequently protecting the biodiversity of the marine ecosystems this macroalgal species supports.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

Y. Benjamini , and D. Yekutieli . 2001. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics 29: 1165–1188. Google Scholar

2.

G. J. Edgar 1984. General features of the ecology and biogeography of Tasmanian rocky reef communities. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 118: 173–186. Google Scholar

3.

C. P. Elliott , N. J. Enright , R. J. N. Allcock , M. G. Gardner , E. Meglécz , J. Anthony , and S. L. Krauss . 2014. Microsatellite markers from the Ion Torrent: A multi-species contrast to 454 shotgun sequencing. Molecular Ecology Resources 14: 554–568. Google Scholar

4.

M. G. Gardner , A. J. Fitch , T. Bertozzi , and A. J. Lowe . 2011. Rise of the machines: Recommendations for ecologists when using next generation sequencing for microsatellite development. Molecular Ecology Resources 11: 1093–1101. Google Scholar

5.

G. Hoarau , J. A. Coyer , W. T. Stam , and J. L. Olsen . 2007. A fast and inexpensive DNA extraction/purification protocol for brown macroalgae. Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 191–193. Google Scholar

6.

S. T. Kalinowski , M. L. Taper , and T. C. Marshall . 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16: 1099–1106. Google Scholar

7.

C. E. Lane , C. Mayes , L. D. Druehl , and G. W. Saunders . 2006. A multigene molecular investigation of the kelp (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) supports substantial taxonomic re-organization. Journal of Phycology 42: 493–512. Google Scholar

8.

E. Meglécz , C. Costedoat , V. Dubut , A. Gilles , T. Malausa , N. Pech , and J.-F. Martin . 2010. QDD: A user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26: 403–404. Google Scholar

9.

R. Peakall , and P. E. Smouse . 2006. GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295. Google Scholar

10.

R. Peakall , and P. E. Smouse . 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537–2539. Google Scholar

11.

P. T. Raimondi , D. C. Reed , B. Gaylord , and L. Washburn . 2004. Effects of self-fertilization in the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera. Ecology 85: 3267–3276. Google Scholar

12.

S. Rozen , and H. Skaletsky . 1999. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

13.

F. Tellier , J. Tapia , S. Faugeron , C. Destombe , and M. Valero . 2011. The Lessonia nigrescens species complex (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) shows strict parapatry and strict reproductive isolation in a secondary contact zone. Journal of Phycology 47: 894–903. Google Scholar

14.

C. van Oosterhout , W. F. Hutchinson , D. P. M. Wills , and P. Shipley . 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535–538. Google Scholar

15.

T. Wernberg , M. S. Thomsen , F. Tuya , G. A. Kendrick , P. A. Staehr , and B. D. Toohey . 2010. Decreasing resilience of kelp beds along a latitudinal temperature gradient: Potential implications for a warmer future. Ecology Letters 13: 685–694. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] The authors thank T. Bradford from Flinders University and N. Burtt from the Australian Genome Research Facility for assistance and support. This project was funded by the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment.

Halley M. S. Durrant, Christopher P. Burridge, and Michael G. Gardner "Isolation Via Next-Generation Sequencing of Microsatellites from the Tasmanian Macroalgae Lessonia corrugata (Lessoniaceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 3(7), (14 July 2015). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1500042
Received: 14 April 2015; Accepted: 1 May 2015; Published: 14 July 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top