Translator Disclaimer
16 September 2015 Development and Characterization of 11 Microsatellite Primers for the Sedge Trichophorum planifolium (Cyperaceae)
Author Affiliations +

Trichophorum planifolium (Spreng.) Palla (Cyperaceae) is a woodland sedge that occurs on dry, rocky slopes in northeastern North America. In Canada, there is only one known extant occurrence, located in a remnant natural area within one of the most highly urbanized regions in the country. Due to its limited Canadian range and an apparent decline in population size (COSEWIC, 2000), T. planifolium is listed as endangered under the Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA). Like many species-at-risk in Canada (Yakimowski and Eckert, 2007; Gibson et al., 2009), T. planifolium reaches the northern limit of its range in Canada, but is relatively common farther south. Although there is some debate over whether, or when, peripheral populations merit national concern (Gibson et al., 2009), empirical evidence suggests that they may be important reserves of genetic diversity (Eckert et al., 2008), providing adaptive and evolutionary potential for the species (Lesica and Allendorf, 1995) and facilitating species' responses to climate change (Etterson and Shaw, 2001; Parmesan, 2006; Gibson et al., 2009).

An understanding of the population genetic structure of T. planifolium is needed to guide management strategies for this species. At present, no molecular markers appropriate for studies of intraspecific genetic variation have been developed for T. planifolium. To this end, we isolated and characterized 11 polymorphic microsatellite loci.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Genomic DNA (∼6 µg ) was extracted from the silica gel—dried leaf tissue of one individual of T. planifolium collected from Daniel Boone National Forest (Kentucky, USA) in 2011 using a NucleoSpin Plant II Kit (Machery-Nagel, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. The sample was submitted to the Georgia Genomics Facility at the University of Georgia (Athens, Georgia, USA) for isolation of microsatellite loci and primer development. DNA was fragmented using the Bioruptor UCD-300 sonication device (Diagenode, Denville, New Jersey, USA). Libraries compatible with Illumina TruSeq HT were prepared using the KAPA Library Preparation Kit (KR0453-v2.13; Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA) with custom indexes from Faircloth and Glenn (2012). Libraries were quantified with Qubit (Life Technologies, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) and sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq v3 600-cycle kit (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA). A total of 6,391,132 reads were imported and paired in Geneious 7.0.6 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand). Illumina TruSeq adapters and bases with an error probability limit above 0.05 were trimmed. A de novo assembly was performed on the first 1,000,000 sequences where both reads of any pair were ≥200 bases. Consensus sequences between 200 and 420 bp were exported from Geneious as FASTA files and imported into MSATCOMMANDER 1.0.8 beta (Faircloth, 2008). A total of 721 loci with perfect di-, tri-, or tetranucleotide repeats were designed at default minimum lengths (i.e., eight repeats for di- and trinucleotide motifs, six repeats for tetranucleotide motifs) and combining loci ≤50 bp apart. Sixty-three CAG-tagged primer pairs for di- (9), tri- (47), and tetranucleotide (7) microsatellite loci with the greatest number of motif repeats were selected for further testing.

Loci were subsequently evaluated for amplification consistency and screened for polymorphisms with 96 samples of T. planifolium collected from 12 populations distributed through the range of the species in May 2014: (1) Tarrywile Park, Connecticut, USA; (2) Bare Mountain, Massachusetts, USA; (3) Dan's Mountain, Maryland, USA; (4) Big Spring State Park, Missouri, USA; (5) Sutton Hollow, Missouri, USA; (6) Elmer G. Raymond Park, New Hampshire, USA; (7) Mendon Ponds Park, New York, USA; (8) Strait Creek Prairie Bluffs Preserve, Ohio, USA; (9) Royal Botanical Gardens, Ontario, Canada; (10) Gifford Pinchot State Park, Pennsylvania, USA; (11) Huckleberry Trail, Virginia, USA; and (12) Fisher Mountain, West Virginia, USA (Appendix 1). These collections yielded substantially higher DNA quality than the samples obtained from the Kentucky population used in microsatellite isolation. Consequently, we chose to use the more recent collections of T. planifolium for further testing of the microsatellite loci. Voucher specimens were obtained for each population, except when population size was estimated to be below 100 individuals, or if permits did not allow destructive sampling. For sites where a voucher was not collected, a representative voucher has been assigned if available. The deposition of vouchers is provided in Appendix 1.

Table 1.

Characterization of 11 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed in Trichophorum planifolium.

t01_01.gif

Reactions were carried out in 12.5-µL reaction volumes containing 2.5 µL 5× Phusion High-Fidelity Buffer (New England Biolabs, Whitby, Ontario, Canada), 0.25 µL dNTPs (10 mM), 0.625 µL untagged primer (10 mM), 0.0625 µL tagged primer (10 mM), 0.5625 µL dye-labeled CAG Tag (10 mM), 0.375 µL DMSO, 0.125 µL Phusion High-Fidelity Polymerase (2 U/µL; New England Biolabs), 5.5 µL ddH2O, and 2.5 µL DNA (10 ng/µL) using a T-100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA). To obtain high-quality amplification product, we used the thermocycling profile of touchdown PCR (TD-PCR) (Korbie and Mattick, 2008) with some modifications. Thermal cycling began with a 5-min denaturation at 95°C; followed by the touchdown phase with 15 cycles of 30 s denaturation at 95°C, 30 s annealing from 72°C to 57°C (−1°C per cycle), and 30 s elongation at 72°C; followed by a generic amplification stage of 20 cycles of 30 s denaturation at 95°C, 30 s annealing at 57°C, and 30 s elongation at 72°C; followed by a 5-min final elongation at 72°C. Amplification products with incorporated fluorescent labels (6-FAM and VIC; Life Technologies) were pooled into groups of four and sequenced by capillary electrophoresis using a 3130xL Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies) with the GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (Life Technologies). Of the 63 primers tested, 18 exhibited consistent amplification and polymorphisms. Eleven loci that could be pooled into four genotyping runs (i.e., the fragment sizes for the primers in each run did not overlap each other) were selected (Table 1) and their utility for future studies of genetic diversity and structure in T. planifolium was evaluated.

Individual samples were genotyped using GeneMapper v.5 software (Life Technologies) and verified with manual scoring. Standard measures of intra-populational genetic diversity including average number of alleles (A) and observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity were calculated with the R package ‘adegenet’ version 1.4–2 (Jombart, 2008) and ‘PopGenReport’ version 2.1 (Adamack and Gruber, 2014) (Table 2). Of the 96 samples initially screened, 16 failed at one or more loci and were excluded from the population genetic analysis. In total, 31 alleles were observed for 11 microsatellite loci in 80 individuals from 12 populations of T. planifolium. The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to six (overall mean = 2.82 alleles), with the highest number detected in the population at Fisher Mountain, West Virginia. The mean Ho per site ranged from 0.00 and 0.06, whereas the mean He varied between 0.00 and 0.19. Although these values are low, they are comparable to those documented in other woodland sedges (e.g., Carex breviculmis R. Br. and C. hebes Nelmes; M'Baya et al., 2013), and may be explained by limited pollen and seed dispersal among populations (Crins, 1989).

CONCLUSIONS

The primer pairs developed in this study successfully amplified 11 polymorphic microsatellite loci in populations distributed across the species' range and, as such, will be a useful tool with which to examine patterns of genetic diversity and differentiation in T. planifolium. An understanding of genetic variability and structure within the Canadian population, and between the Canadian and core populations in the United States, is necessary to guide the development of effective management and monitoring protocols for the species.

Table 2.

Results of initial primer screening and genotyping in 80 individuals from 12 populations of Trichophorum planifolium.

t02_01.gif

LITERATURE CITED

1.

A. T. Adamack , and B. Gruber . 2014. PopGenReport: Simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5: 384–387. Google Scholar

2.

COSEWIC . 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the bashful bulrush Trichophorum planifolium in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa, Canada. Google Scholar

3.

W. J. Crins 1989. Status of the few-flowered club-rush, Scirpus verecundus (Cyperaceae), in Canada. Canadian Field Naturalist 103: 57–60. Google Scholar

4.

C. G. Eckert , E. Samis , and S. C. Lougheed . 2008. Genetic variation across species' geographical ranges: The central-marginal hypothesis and beyond. Molecular Ecology 17: 1170–1188. Google Scholar

5.

J. R. Etterson , and R. G. Shaw . 2001. Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science 294: 151–154. Google Scholar

6.

B. C. Faircloth 2008. MSATCOMMANDER: Detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 92–94. Google Scholar

7.

B. C. Faircloth , and T. C. Glenn , 2012. Not all sequence tags are created equal: Designing and validating sequence identification tags robust to indels. PLoS One 7: e42543. Google Scholar

8.

S. Y. Gibson , R. C. V. Van der Marel , and B. M. Starzomski . 2009. Climate change and conservation of leading-edge peripheral populations. Conservation Biology 23: 1369–1373. Google Scholar

9.

T. Jombart 2008. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 24: 1403–1405. Google Scholar

10.

D. J. Korbie , and J. S. Mattick . 2008. Touchdown PCR for increased specificity and sensitivity in PCR amplification. Nature Protocols 3: 1452–1456. Google Scholar

11.

P. Lesica , and F. W. Allendorf . 1995. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conservation Biology 9: 753–760. Google Scholar

12.

J. M'Baya , M. J. Blacket , and A. A. Hoffman . 2013. Genetic structure of Carex species from the Australian alpine region along elevation gradients: Patterns of reproduction and gene flow. International Journal of Plant Sciences 174: 189–199. Google Scholar

13.

C. Parmesan 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37: 637–669. Google Scholar

14.

S. B. Yakimowski , and C. G. Eckert . 2007. Threatened peripheral populations in context: Geographical variation in population frequency and size and sexual reproduction in a clonal woody shrub. Conservation Biology 21: 811–822. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Voucher information for Trichophorum planifolium populations used in this study.

tA01_01.gif

Notes

[1] This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship to V.J.N.), the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (Species at Risk Stewardship Fund no. 110-14-VNowell to V.J.N.), and Environment Canada (Interdepartmental Recovery Fund no. 2227 to T.W.S.).

Victoria J. Nowell, Song Wang, and Tyler W. Smith "Development and Characterization of 11 Microsatellite Primers for the Sedge Trichophorum planifolium (Cyperaceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 3(9), (16 September 2015). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1500050
Received: 29 April 2015; Accepted: 1 June 2015; Published: 16 September 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top