Translator Disclaimer
5 April 2016 Development and Characterization of Microsatellite Primers in the Federally Endangered Astragalus bibullatus (Fabaceae)
Author Affiliations +

Astragalus bibullatus Barneby & E. L. Bridges (Fabaceae; Pyne's ground plum) is a herbaceous perennial endemic to the limestone cedar glades of the Central Basin of Middle Tennessee (Barneby and Bridges, 1987). It is a federally endangered species, known only from eight extant locations in Rutherford County (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2011). Previous studies using allozymes (Baskauf and Snapp, 1998; Morris et al., 2002) and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) (Baskauf and Burke, 2009) to investigate population structure have found limited genetic diversification among sites. Demographic studies have shown that population sizes fluctuate, in some cases dramatically, from year to year (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2011). More importantly, seed recruitment and fertility appear to vary by site (Albrecht, 2011). The genetic consequences of these combined factors (long-lived, genetically diverse seed bank, fluctuating population sizes, and differential recruitment success) have yet to be evaluated.

Many recognize nuclear microsatellites as the preferred molecular approach for ecological and conservation genetic studies, due to their highly variable, codominant nature (Selkoe and Toonen, 2006). The greatest disadvantage to microsatellites is likely the need for prerequisite knowledge of the genome of the target species, as amplification primers are designed to match a specific location within the genome, unlike AFLPs, random-amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPDs), and intersimple sequence repeats (ISSRs) (Selkoe and Toonen, 2006). Here we present a suite of novel nuclear microsatellite loci in A. bibullatus, developed using next-generation sequencing (Davey et al., 2011; Ekblom and Galindo, 2011; Zalapa et al., 2012) on an Illumina platform. The resulting loci will be useful in long-term conservation studies of the target taxon, as well as in broader taxonomic studies of closely related taxa. In addition, the methodological approach used here provides a relatively straightforward workflow for the user new to microsatellite development and characterization, regardless of study system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total genomic DNA of a single individual of A. bibullatus collected from a natural population by Carol Baskauf (Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, Tennessee, USA) was extracted using the QIAGEN DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA). The sample was submitted to the Evolutionary Genetics Core Facility (EGCF) at Cornell University (Ithaca, New York, USA) to generate and then sequence an enriched genomic library using an Illumina MiSeq platform (San Diego, California, USA) to target di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexameric microsatellite repeats (Andrés and Bogdanowicz, 2011). EGCF supplied files containing more than 3000 possible primer pairs, which were identified in MSATCOMMANDER 1.0.3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1999; Faircloth, 2008). We selected 46 primer pairs for our initial screen, with an emphasis on tri- and dinucleotide repeat motifs. Repeat counts of targeted loci ranged from five to 15, and targets were chosen with an effort to diversify the motifs selected. Contigs of selected targets were aligned and compared to verify that all loci were unique. All PCR reactions were three-primer reactions following Schuelke (2000). A 17-base tail (5′-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′) was added to the 5′ end of each forward primer; a 7-base PIG-tail (5′-GTTTCTT-3′) was added to the 5′ end of each reverse primer. A third primer identical to the tail on the forward primer was fluorescently labeled with one of three standard tags (FAM, VIC, or NED). Loci were initially screened in singleplex using eight individuals from two natural populations, with reactions having the following final concentrations: 1× Platinum Taq Buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 200 nM total dNTPs, 0.15 µM fluorescently labeled primer, 0.05 µM forward primer, 0.2 µM reverse primer, and 1 unit of Platinum Taq DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen by Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York, USA). A touchdown cycling profile was used for all amplifications: six cycles of 95°C for 45 s, followed by annealing at 61 °C (dropping one degree per cycle) for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min; the remaining 29 cycles consisted of 95°C for 40 s, 55°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min. All loci were initially run in singleplex on an ABI 3130xl DNA Analyzer at Middle Tennessee State University using a GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems by Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York, USA). Traces were analyzed in GeneMarker MTP 2.6.0 (SoftGenetics, State College, Pennsylvania, USA).

Table 1.

Characterization of novel nuclear microsatellite loci developed for the federally endangered legume Astragalus bibullatus (Pyne's ground plum).

t01_01.gif

Following this initial screen, 12 loci were selected for further data collection based on clarity of amplification and ease of scoring from the initial eight samples. Additional samples were selected from three reintroduction sites (Couchville, Stones River National Battlefield [SRNB] Glade 7, and SRNB Glade 54), which originated from multiple natural seed source populations in Rutherford County, Tennessee, and therefore, likely represent the range of diversity expected in this endangered species. All three sites are in Rutherford County, Tennessee. Locality data are not reported here and population vouchers were not collected due to the sensitive nature of ongoing recovery efforts. A total of 109 individuals were genotyped at all loci following the same protocol as above, pooling two to three loci where possible as determined by allele size range. In addition, all loci were tested for cross-amplification in A. crassicarpus Nutt. var. trichocalyx (Nutt.) Barneby (n = 9), A. gypsodes Barneby (n = 2; TEX201642, TEX201643), and A. tennesseensis A. Gray ex Chapm. (n = 5) using the same parameters and strategies described above. Additional locality data are not reported here and population vouchers were not collected for A. crassicarpus var. trichocalyx or A. tennesseensis, due to both species being of conservation concern. Sequences on which primers were designed were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). A total of 12 novel loci were identified as polymorphic in the A. bibullatus samples included in this study. GenAlEx 6.502 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012) was used to calculate the number of alleles per locus and expected and observed heterozygosity by population (Table 2). The number of alleles per locus per population ranged from one to 15, with observed heterozygosity ranging from 0.000 (Abib120 exhibited a single allele within A. bibullatus) to 0.938, and expected heterozygosity ranging from 0.000 to 0.860. All loci successfully cross-amplified and were polymorphic in A. crassicarpus var. trichocalyx, A. gypsodes, and A. tennesseensis. Seven recently published loci (AM_15, AM_18, AM_25, AM_29, AM_34, AM_46, and AM_71) developed for A. michauxii (Kuntze) F. J. Herm. (Fabaceae; Wall et al., 2014) were also tested for amplification in all species included here. Of these, three successfully amplified (AM_15, AM_46, AM_71) in all species, except AM_71, which did not amplify in A. tennesseensis.

Table 2.

Genetic properties of the 12 newly developed microsatellites of Astragalus bibullatus.a

t02_01.gif

CONCLUSIONS

The loci developed here for A. bibullatus are now being used to assess population genetic structure in complement to an ongoing demographic study of five natural populations in addition to the three reintroduction populations presented here. These data will be combined with long-term demographic data of monitored individuals to better understand the reproductive ecology of this system. Additionally, preliminary data indicate that at least some of the markers developed here exhibit private alleles among each of the congeners evaluated in this study, suggesting that these markers will be valuable tools in systematic and phylogeographic investigations of closely related Astragalus species.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

Albrecht, M. A. 2011. Final Report—Demographic monitoring of natural populations of Pyne's ground plum (Astragalus bibullatus). Report prepared for the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA. Google Scholar

2.

Andrés, J. A., and S. M. Bogdanowicz. 2011. Isolating microsatellite loci: Looking back, looking ahead. In V. Orgogozo and M. V. Rockman [eds.], Molecular methods for evolutionary genetics, 211– 232. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

3.

Barneby, R. C., and E. L. Bridges. 1987. A new species of Astragalus (Fabaceae) from Tennessee's Central Basin. Brittonia 39: 358–363. Google Scholar

4.

Baskauf, C. J., and S. Snapp. 1998. Population genetics of the cedarglade endemic Astragalus bibullatus (Fabaceae) using isozymes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 90–96. Google Scholar

5.

Baskauf, C. J., and J. M. Burke. 2009. Population genetics of Astragalus bibullatus (Fabaceae) using AFLPs. Journal of Heredity 100: 424–431. Google Scholar

6.

Davey, J. W., P. A. Hohenlohe, P. D. Etter, J. Q. Boone, J. M. Catchen, and M. L. Blaxter. 2011. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nature Reviews. Genetics 12: 499–510. Google Scholar

7.

Ekblom, R., and J. Galindo. 2011. Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms. Heredity 107: 1–15. Google Scholar

8.

Faircloth, B. C. 2008. MSATCOMMANDER: Detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 92–94. Google Scholar

9.

Morris, A. B., R. S. Baucom, and M. B. Cruzan. 2002. Stratified analysis of the soil seed bank in the cedar glade endemic Astragalus bibullatus: Evidence for historical changes in genetic structure. American Journal of Botany 89: 29–36. Google Scholar

10.

Peakall, R., and P. E. Smouse. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28: 2537–2539. Google Scholar

11.

Rozen, S., and H. Skaletsky. 1999. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

12.

Schuelke, M. 2000. An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18: 233–234. Google Scholar

13.

Selkoe, K. A., and R. J. Toonen. 2006. Microsatellites for ecologists: A practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecology Letters 9: 615–629. Google Scholar

14.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Recovery plan for Astragalus bibullatus (Pyne's ground-plum). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Google Scholar

15.

Wall, W. A., N. A. Douglas, W. A. Hoffmann, T. R. Wentworth, J. B. Gray, Q.-Y. J. Xiang, B. K. Knaus, and M. G. Hohmann. 2014. Evidence of population bottleneck in Astragalus michauxii (Fabaceae), a narrow endemic of the southeastern United States. Conservation Genetics 15: 153–164. Google Scholar

16.

Zalapa, J. E., C. Hugo, H. Zhu, S. Steffan, D. Senalik, E. Zeldin, B. McCown, et al. 2012. Using next-generation sequencing approaches to isolate simple sequent repeat (SSR) loci in the plant sciences. American Journal of Botany 99: 193–208. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] This work was funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and a Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) Undergraduate Research Experience and Creative Activity (URECA) Team Award. The authors thank C. Baskauf for DNA for initial marker development and M. Moore for contribution of herbarium material. We thank M. A. Albrecht, Q. G. Long, and G. Call for field assistance, and S. M. Bogdanowicz and A. Elliott-Cole for technical assistance.

Ashley B. Morris, Cassandra Scalf, Austin Burleyson, La Tonya Johnson, and Kevin Trostel "Development and Characterization of Microsatellite Primers in the Federally Endangered Astragalus bibullatus (Fabaceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 4(4), (5 April 2016). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1500126
Received: 9 November 2015; Accepted: 1 December 2015; Published: 5 April 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top