Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
16 May 2016 Development and Characterization of 15 Microsatellite Markers for Cephalotaxus fortunei (Cephalotaxaceae)
Chunbo Wang, Zhiyou Guo, Xilian Huang, Lu Huang
Author Affiliations +

Cephalotaxus fortunei Hook. is a perennial, coniferous shrub or small tree belonging to the family Cephalotaxaceae. Endemic to China, C. fortunei is mainly distributed from the subtropical regions up to the northernmost Qinling Mountains and Huai River in central China, occurring in locations with an elevation between 200 and 3700 m (Zhou et al., 1997). Because it contains the anticancer alkaloid harringtonine, C. fortunei is important for medicinal use in treating leucocythemia (Shi et al., 2010). Its natural populations in China face threats of deforestation, other human-induced disturbances, and overexploitation. At present, C. fortunei is listed as a Category V threatened plant by the international Conifer Specialist Group (He et al., 1996). Thus, a deeper understanding of genetic variation and population structure of this species using polymorphic DNA markers will provide valuable information for developing conservation strategies.

In this study, we developed 15 microsatellite loci for C. fortunei using the Fast Isolation by AFLP of Sequences Containing repeats (FIASCO) approach (Zane et al., 2002), and we also examined their ability to be cross-amplified in C. oliveri Mast.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-five individuals of C. fortunei from five populations were collected in its natural distribution area from 2014 to 2015, and voucher specimens were deposited at the herbarium of Qiannan Normal College for Nationalities (Appendix 1). Young and healthy leaves were preserved in silica gel. All samples were stored at −20°C until processed. Total genomic DNA was extracted using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol with −20°C propanone pretreatment to eliminate polysaccharides (Su et al., 1998).

The FIASCO method was used to develop microsatellite loci using one individual of C. fortunei from the Guizhou population (voucher: CB Wang 201406, JP3 [QNCN]). Approximately 3 µg of DNA was digested with MseI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA). The DNA digestion fragments were linked to an MseI adapter pair (F: 5′-TACTCAGGACTCAT-3′, R: 5′-GACGATGAGTCCTGAG-3′) with T4 ligase at 4°C overnight (Pan et al., 2011). A diluted digestion-ligation mixture (1:10) was directly amplified using the following program: 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 20 min, and 72°C for 1.5 min for 23 cycles with MseI-N primers (5′-GATGAGTCCTGAGTAAN-3′). Then, we used 5′-biotinylated (AC)15 and streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) to hybridize and capture the PCR product (Miao et al., 2012). Enriched fragments were recovered with PCR amplification as described above, using MseI-N as the primers. Purifying with a multifunctional DNA Extraction Kit (OMEGA Bio-Tek, Norcross, Georgia, USA), the PCR products were then ligated into pTA2 vector (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells. A total of 80 clones were selected by blue-white screening and tested by PCR using M13+/M13− as primers. Seventy-six positive clones were chosen to be sequenced on an ABI Prism 3730 automated DNA sequencer (Invitrogen, Guangzhou, China). Out of the 76 clones, 27 clones contained simple sequence repeats, of which 12 were discarded because they were unsuitable for designing primers. Primers for the remaining 15 sequences were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 (Clark and Gorley, 2001).

We used 75 individuals from five populations to test the polymorphism of the newly developed primer pairs (Table 1). The PCR amplifications were performed in a 20-µL reaction containing 1 µL of genomic DNA, 2 µL of PCR buffer, 0.5 µL 10 mM each primer, 1 µL 10 mM dNTP mixture, and 1 unit Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Dalian, China). PCR profiles were as follows: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 45 s, annealing temperature for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 1 min; and final extension at 72°C for 10 min (Table 1). PCR products were electrophoresed on 6% polyacrylamide denaturing gels by silver staining using a 50-bp ladder. Thirteen of the 15 loci were found to be polymorphic. The sizes of all amplification products matched the expected lengths.

Table 1.

Characteristics of 15 microsatellite loci for Cephalotaxus fortunei.

t01_01.gif

The effective number of alleles (Ae), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), and departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were estimated by GenAlEx version 6.4 (Peakall and Smouse, 2006). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) across all populations was tested using GENEPOP version 4.0.10 (Rousset, 2008). The occurrence of null alleles was investigated using MICRO-CHECKER version 2.2.3 (Van Oosterhout et al., 2004). The number of alleles per locus varied from one to seven, with a total of 247 alleles scored across the 75 individuals. He and Ho ranged from 0.108 to 0.738 and from 0.000 to 1.000, respectively. All loci were found to be in HWE. No null alleles were detected, and no significant LD (P > 0.05) was detected (Table 2). Furthermore, all 15 loci were successfully amplified in 75 individuals of C. oliveri from five populations (Appendix 1). Of these, 10 loci (CF1–CF10) were polymorphic (Table 3).

Table 2.

Genetic diversity of 13 polymorphic microsatellite loci in Cephalotaxus fortunei populations.a

t02_01.gif

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we developed 15 microsatellite loci for C. fortunei, 13 of which were polymorphic. The genetic information based on these newly developed microsatellite loci will contribute to the management and conservation of C. fortunei. In addition, the successful cross-species amplification of the loci in C. oliveri implies that they will provide an opportunity to further investigate the adaptive evolution of Cephalotaxus species.

Table 3.

Genetic diversity in five Cephalotaxus oliveri populations using 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci originally developed in C. fortunei.a

t03_01.gif

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province of China (20152137) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province of China (2015380).

LITERATURE CITED

1.

Clark, K. R., and R. N. Gorley. 2001. Primer v5: User manual/tutorial. Primer-E, Plymouth, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

2.

He, X. Q., J. X. Lin, Y. S. Hu, X. P. Wang, and F. Z. Li. 1996. Comparison among threatened categories of conifers from China. Chinese Biodiversity 4: 45–51. Google Scholar

3.

Miao, Y. C., X. D. Lang, S. F. Li, J. R. Su, and Y. H. Wang. 2012. Characterization of 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci for Cephalotaxus oliveri (Cephalotaxaceae), a conifer of medicinal importance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13: 11165–11172. Google Scholar

4.

Pan, H. W., Y. R. Guo, Y. J. Su, and T. Wang. 2011. Development of microsatellite loci for Cephalotaxus oliveri (Cephalotaxaceae) and cross-amplification in Cephalotaxus. American Journal of Botany 98: e229–e232. Google Scholar

5.

Peakall, R., and P. E. Smouse. 2006. GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295. Google Scholar

6.

Rousset, F. 2008. GENEPOP'007: A complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103–106. Google Scholar

7.

Shi, G. L., Z. Y. Zhou, and Z. M. Xie. 2010. A new Cephalotaxus and associated epiphyllous fungi from the Oligocene of Guangxi, South China. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 161: 179–195. Google Scholar

8.

Su, Y. J., T. Wang, W. D. Yang, C. Huang, and G. K. Fan. 1998. DNA extraction and RAPD analysis of Podocarpus. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni 37: 13–18. Google Scholar

9.

Van Oosterhout, C., W. F. Hutchinson, D. P. M. Wills, and P. Shipley. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535–538. Google Scholar

10.

Zane, L., L. Bargelloni, and T. Patarnello. 2002. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: A review. Molecular Ecology 11: 1–16. Google Scholar

11.

Zhou, X. J., Z. B. Hu, and L. D. Huang. 1997. Studies on Cephalotaxus plants resources over China. Journal of Hubei Agricultural College 17: 100–103. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Geographic location and voucher information of each population for Cephalotaxus fortunei and C. oliveri in this study. All voucher specimens were deposited at the herbarium of Qiannan Normal College for Nationalities (QNCN).

tA01_01.gif
Chunbo Wang, Zhiyou Guo, Xilian Huang, and Lu Huang "Development and Characterization of 15 Microsatellite Markers for Cephalotaxus fortunei (Cephalotaxaceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 4(5), (16 May 2016). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1500129
Received: 13 November 2015; Accepted: 1 January 2016; Published: 16 May 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
Cephalotaxaceae
Cephalotaxus fortunei
cross-amplification
FIASCO
genetic analysis
microsatellite primers
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top