Translator Disclaimer
18 June 2019 Spermophora senoculata on Sicily/Italy (Araneae: Pholcidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The pholcid spider Spermophora senoculata (Dugès, 1836) is recorded for the first time on the Mediterranean Island of Sicily (Italy) from indoor heated and non-heated habitats of two cities. This species is associated with mostly anthropogenic habitats around the globe. Uncertainty remains about where its native distribution range is located.

The genus Spermophora Hentz, 1841 (Araneae: Pholcidae) currently includes forty-six species in total (World Spider Catalog 2019), mainly spread across Africa, Asia, Northern Australia and some Pacific Islands (Huber 2005). However, the systematic position of many of these species remains significantly problematic as the genus is highly polyphyletic (Huber et al. 2018).

Today, the existing literature records indicate S. senoculata to be widespread across the Mediterranean basin. It is currently considered to be present in the following countries around the Mediterranean Sea: Israel (Zonstein et al. 2015), Turkey (Demir & Seyyar 2017), Greece including Crete (Deltshev 2011, Bosmans et al. 2013), Croatia and Montenegro (Nentwig et al. 2019), Slovenia (Kostanjšek & Kuntner 2015), Italy (peninsular and Sardinia) (Pantini & Isaia 2018), Malta (Pfliegler et al. 2017), Tunisia (Dimassi et al. 2016), France including Corsica (Pétillon et al. 2007, Lissner 2016), and Spain including the Balearic Islands (Cardoso & Morano 2010). Interesting examples of populations found in natural areas in the Mediterranean were reported by Senglet (1971), who wrote about the presence of S. senoculata on Crete under stones around the ruins of Knossos and in a cave, and Brignoli (1979a), who recorded its presence inside a Sardinian cave. In April 2019, a juvenile Spermophora cf. senoculata was found in the Botanical Garden of Bologna (Italy) under a fallen log (P. Di Pompeo leg.).

However, only in the last 20 years an astonishing 38 new species, currently considered to belong to Spermophora, were described (Huber 2001, 2003a, 2003b, 2003c, 2005, 2009b, Senglet 2008, Huber & Warui 2012, Huber & Kwapong 2013, Yao & Li 2013, Huber et al. 2014). Many others were attributed to other genera, including new similar genera that have been described. Although none of these species is Mediterranean, and S. senoculata still presents some unmistakable characters, this level of change in the taxonomy of the genus suggests that it may be worth confirming previous records of S. senoculata by re-examination of voucher specimens.

Material and methods

The specimens are stored in the personal collections Dentici and Di Pompeo. They were photographed using a Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1–5× Macro Photo lens along with a Canon 1300D reflex camera. The program CombineZP was used to fuse images. Determination: Huber (2002), Nentwig et al. (2019). Other taxonomic studies dealing with Spermophora and related groups (see Introduction) were also consulted.

Results

Spiders were collected by direct sampling at three localities: (1) ITALY, Sicily, Palermo, Mondello, 38.1953°N, 13.3350°E, 5 m a.s.l., room of a house and a non-heated building, 2. Nov. 2018, 3 ♀♀, 16. Feb. 2019, 1 ♂, E. Schifani leg.; (2) ITALY, Sicily, Santa Lucia del Mela, 38.1412 °N, 15.2834°E, 250 m a.s.l., room of a house, 21. Nov. 2018, 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀ L. Alleruzzo leg.; (3) ITALY, Sicily, Palermo, 38.1480°N, 13.3150°E, 70 m a.s.l., non-heated building, 20. Mar. 2019, 4 ♀♀ A. Dentici leg.

Immature and adult females were collected at all three sites, and an adult male was collected in Mondello (Fig. 1). Reproduction was witnessed once, inside a heated room in Mondello, where an adult female was observed surrounded by twenty-one newly hatched spiderlings.

Discussion

The type species of the genus Spermophora. S. senoculata (Dugès, 1836), is the only one to have attained global distribution due to human-mediated dispersal (Huber 2005). Unfortunately, the identity of its native range is not yet understood. It may be a Mediterranean (Huber et al. 2017) or a Middle-Eastern species (Nentwig et al. 2019), while its closest relatives are probably native to Western Asia (Huber et al. 2018). Currently, S. senoculata is well-distributed across Europe (without the northern parts, the northernmost record is from Belgium) and North America and east to Japan (Huber 2000, Nentwig 2015, World Spider Catalog 2019), and was also observed in South America (Laborda & Simó 2008). Widely regarded as a synanthropic species, it is usually found inside buildings across most of its range (e.g. Huber 2000, 2005, Blick et al. 2004).

Many pholcid species have successfully spread across continents outside their native range as a result of human activities. The Asian Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin, 1775) and the Mediterranean Holocnemus pluchei (Scopoli, 1763) are among the most successful of relevance to temperate regions (Huber 2009a). At least sixteen pholcid species have been introduced in Europe, making Pholcidae the second most species-rich introduced family in the continent, placed between the much larger families Salticidae Blackwall, 1841 and Theridiidae Sundevall, 1833 (Van Keer & Van Keer 2001, Kobelt & Nentwig 2008, Huber et al. 2015, Nentwig 2015, Huber et al. 2017). Among them, a second species of Spermophora. S. kerinci Huber, 2005, native to South-eastern Asia (Huber 2005), was recently discovered inside some heated buildings in England and Germany just few years after its description (Snazell & Smithers 2007, Kielhorn 2009). Of these sixteen pholcid species (Nentwig 2015, Huber et al. 2015), apart from Spermophora spp., the following six are currently considered established (Nentwig 2015): Artema atlanta Walckenaer, 1837, Crossopriza lyoni (Blackwall, 1867), Micropholcus fauroti (Simon 1887), Modisimus culicinus (Simon, 1893), Pholcus phalangioides. Psilochorus simoni (Berland, 1911) and Smeringopus pallidus (Blackwall, 1858). Most of the introduced pholcids appear to prefer anthropogenic habitats and none is recognized as harmful (Huber et al. 2017). In general, the current knowledge about the impacts of exotic spiders on native arthropod communities remains very low (Nentwig 2015).

Fig. 1:

Details of Sicilian specimens of Spermophora senoculata (Dugès, 1836) from Palermo, Mondello, (Italy). Left to right: adult female, dorsal view of the prosoma; adult female, epigyne; adult male, pedipalp in lateral view (photos by E. Schifani)

f01_01.jpg

The discovery of Spermophora senoculata on the island of Sicily is not surprising given its already widespread presence in neighbouring regions. Moreover, the Sicilian araneofauna has been neglected for many years, and numerous species were recorded only in recent times (Di Pompeo et al. 2011, Dentici 2017, Dentici & Amata 2018). Our findings occurred exclusively inside cities, and the knowledge of cave spiders in Sicily does not report any trace of its presence from these potentially suitable habitats (Brignoli 1979b). However, it appears premature to exclude the possibility that it represents a native species. The examples from other Mediterranean large islands, such as Crete and Sardinia (Senglet 1971, Brignoli 1979a), suggest that S. senoculata could be able to find suitable natural habitats for its establishment. Moreover, further supporting this possibility, a single juvenile Spermophora specimen (unfortunately not morphologically identifiable to species rank) was very recently found under a stone in a pine reforestation on the island of Marettimo (Egadi Islands), only few kilometres west of Sicily (37.9605°N, 12.0734°E, 28. Apr. 2019, A. Dentici leg.).

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the reviewers and the editors, and particularly Bernhard Huber (Alexander Koenig Research Museum of Zoology, Germany), for their constructive suggestions, which improved the final quality of our manuscript.

References

1.

Blick T, Bosmans R, Buchar J, Gajdoš P, Hänggi A, van Helsdingen P, Růžička V, Staręga W & Thaler K2004Checkliste der Spinnen Mitteleuropas. Checklist of the spiders of Central Europe. (Arachnida: Araneae). – Internet:  https://arages.de/fileadmin/Pdf/checklist2004_araneae.pdf (14. Dec. 2018) Google Scholar

2.

Bosmans R, Van Keer J, Russell-Smith A, Kronestedt T, Alderweireldt M, Bosselaers J & De Koninck H 2013Spiders of Crete (Araneae). A catalogue of all currently known species from the Greek island of Crete. – Nieuwsbrief van de Belgische Arachnologische Vereniging 28, Supplement1: 1–147 Google Scholar

3.

Brignoli PM 1979aRagni d'Italia XXXI. Specie cavernicole nouve o interessanti (Araneae). – Quaderni del Museo di Speleologia ‘V. Rivera', L'Aquila10: 3–48 Google Scholar

4.

Brignoli PM 1979bRagni d'Italia XXXII. Specie Cavernicole di Sicilia (Araneae). – Animalia5: 273–286 Google Scholar

5.

Cardoso P & Morano E 2010The Iberian spider checklist (Araneae). – Zootaxa2495: 1–52 –  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2495.1.1 Google Scholar

6.

Deltshev C 2011The faunistic diversity of cave-dwelling spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) of Greece. – Arachnologische Mitteilungen40: 23–32 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit4004 Google Scholar

7.

Demir H & Seyyar O 2017Annotated checklist of the spiders of Turkey. – Munis Entomology & Zoology12: 433–469 Google Scholar

8.

Dentici A 2017Contribution to the knowledge of Sicilian spider fauna (Arachnida Araneae). – Biodiversity Journal8: 861–864 Google Scholar

9.

Dentici A & Amata FC 2018New faunistic data for the Sicilian Aracnofauna (Arachnida Araneae). – Biodiversity Journal9: 271–276 –  https://doi.org/10.31396/Biodiv.Jour.2018.9.3.271.276 Google Scholar

10.

Dimassi N, Ezzine IK, Khadra YB, Zellama MS, Othmen AB & Said K 2016A new record of spider species from Tunisia (Arachnida: Araneae). – Journal of Research in Biological Sciences2: 13–29 Google Scholar

11.

Di Pompeo P, Kulczycki A, Legittimo CM & Simeon E 2011. New records for Europe: Argiope trifasciata (Forsskål, 1775) from Italy and Malta (Araneae, Araneidae). – Arachnology15: 205–208 –  https://doi.org/10.13156/arac.2011.15.6.205 Google Scholar

12.

Huber BA 2000New Wor ld pholcid spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae): a revision at generic level. – Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History254: 1–347 –  https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2000)254<0001:NWPSAP>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar

13.

Huber BA 2001The pholcids of Australia (Araneae; Pholcidae): taxonomy, biogeography, and relationships. – Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History260: 1–144 –  https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2001)260<0001:TPOAAP>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar

14.

Huber BA 2002Functional morphology of the genitalia in the spider Spermophora senoculata (Pholcidae, Araneae). – Zoologischer Anzeiger241: 105–116. –  https://doi.org/10.1078/0044-5231-00024 Google Scholar

15.

Huber BA 2003aCladistic analysis of Malagasy pholcid spiders reveals generic level endemism: Revision of Zatavua n. gen. and Paramicromerys Millot (Pholcidae, Araneae). – Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society137: 261–318 –  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1096-3642.2003.00046.x Google Scholar

16.

Huber BA 2003bHigh species diversity in one of the dominant groups of spiders in East African montane forests (Aranae: Pholcidae: Buitinga n. gen., Spermophora Hentz). – Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society137: 555–619 –  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1096-3642.2003.00053.x Google Scholar

17.

Huber BA 2003cSouthern African pholcid spiders: revision and cladistic analysis of Quamtana gen. nov. and Spermophora Hentz (Araneae: Pholcidae), with notes on male-female covariation. – Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society139: 477–527 –  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0024-4082.2003.00082.x Google Scholar

18.

Huber BA 2005Revision of the genus Spermophora Hentz in Southeast Asia and on the Pacific Islands, with descriptions of three new genera (Araneae: Pholcidae). – Zoologische Mededelingen79: 61–114 Google Scholar

19.

Huber BA 2009aFour new generic and 14 new specific synonymies in Pholcidae, and transfer of Pholcoides Roewer to Filistatidae (Araneae). – Zootaxa1970: 64–68 –  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1970.1.3 Google Scholar

20.

Huber BA 2009bLife on leaves: leaf-dwelling pholcids of Guinea, with emphasis on Crossopriza cylindrogaster Simon, a spider with inverted resting position, pseudo-eyes, lampshade web, and tetrahedral egg-sac (Araneae: Pholcidae). – Journal of Natural History43: 2491–2523 –  https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930903207876 Google Scholar

21.

Huber BA, Eberle J & Dimitrov D 2018The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). – ZooKeys789: 51–101 –  https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781 Google Scholar

22.

Huber BA & Kwapong 2013West African pholcid spiders: an overview, with descriptions of five new species (Araneae, Pholcidae). – European Journal of Taxonomy59: 1–44 –  https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2013.59 Google Scholar

23.

Huber BA, Le Gall P & Mavoungou JF 2014Pholcid spiders from the Lower Guinean region of Central Africa: an overview, with descriptions of seven new species (Araneae, Pholcidae). – European Journal of Taxonomy81: 1–46 –  https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.81 Google Scholar

24.

Huber BA, Neumann J, Grabolle A & Hula V 2017Aliens in Europe: updates on the distributions of Modisimus culicinus and Micropholcus fauroti (Araneae, Pholcidae). – Arachnologische Mitteilungen53: 12–18 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit5303 Google Scholar

25.

Huber BA, Neumann J, Rehfeldt S, Grabolle A & Reiser N 2015. Back in Europe: Quamtana spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae) in Germany. – Arachnologische Mitteilungen50: 51–56 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit5007 Google Scholar

26.

Huber BA & Warui CM 2012East African pholcid spiders: an overview, with descriptions of eight new species (Araneae, Pholcidae). – European Journal of Taxonomy29: 1–44 –  https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2012.29 Google Scholar

27.

Kielhorn KH 2009First records of Spermophora kerinci. Nesticella mogera and Pseudanapis aloha on the European mainland (Araneae: Pholcidae, Nesticidae, Anapidae). – Arachnologische Mitteilungen37: 31–34 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit3706 Google Scholar

28.

Kobelt M & Nentwig W 2008Alien spider introductions to Europe supported by global trade. – Diversity and Distributions14: 273–280 –  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00426.x Google Scholar

29.

Kostanjšek R & Kuntner M 2015Araneae Sloveniae: a national spider species checklist. – ZooKeys474: 1–91 –  https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.474.8474 Google Scholar

30.

Laborda A & Simó M 2008First South American records of Holocnemus pluchei (Scopoli, 1763) and Spermophora senoculata (Duges, 1836) (Araneae: Pholcidae). – Ganaya72: 261–265 –  file:////colombo/gledfs01/BONJC-P-TRACK/BONJC/BA1965/BA196503/10.4067/S0717-65382008000200013 Google Scholar

31.

Lissner JA 2016A small study of the Corsican spider and pseudoscorpion fauna (Araneae, Pseudoscorpiones). – Nieuwsbrief SPINED36: 5–15 Google Scholar

32.

Nentwig W 2015Introduction, establishment rate, pathways and impact of spiders alien to Europe. – Biological Invasions17: 2757–2778 –  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0912-5 Google Scholar

33.

Nentwig W, Hänggi A, Kropf C & Blick T2019araneae – Spiders of Europe, version 2.2019. –  https://doi.org/https://araneae.nmbe.ch https://doi.org/10.24436/1 Google Scholar

34.

Pantini P & Isaia M2018Checklist of the Italian spiders (Version June 2018). – Internet:  www.museoscienzebergamo.it/web/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=367:checklist&catid =96: checklist-ragni-italiani&Itemid=94 (14. Dec. 2018) Google Scholar

35.

Pétillon J, Courtial C, Canard A & Ysnel F 2007First assessment of spider rarity in Western France. – Revista Ibérica de Aracnología15: 105–113 Google Scholar

36.

Pfliegler WP, Schönhofer A, Niedbała W, Vella P, Sciberras A & Vella A 2017New records of mites (Acari) and harvestmen (Opiliones) from Malta with a preliminary checklist of Maltese Arachnida. – Soil Organisms89: 85–110 Google Scholar

37.

Snazell R & Smithers P 2007 Pseudanapis aloha Forster (Araneae, Anapidae) from the Eden Project in Cornwall, England. – Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society14: 74–76 –  https://doi.org/10.13156/arac.2007.14.2.74 Google Scholar

38.

Senglet A 1971Note sur les Pholcidae (Arachn.) de Grèce. – Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft44: 345–359 –  https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-401666 Google Scholar

39.

Senglet A 2008New species of Pholcus and Spermophora (Pholcidae, Araneae) from Iran and Afghanistan, with notes on mating mechanisms. – Revue Suisse de Zoologie115: 355–376 –  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.80432 Google Scholar

40.

Van Keer K & Van Keer J 2001Ingeburgerde exotische rilspinnen (Araneae: Pholcidae) in Antwerpse haven en enkele algemene bedenkingen bij spinnenmigratie. – Nieuwsbrief van de Belgische Arachnologische Vereniging16: 81–86 Google Scholar

41.

World Spider Catalog2019World spider catalog. Version 20.0.Natural History Museum, Bern. –  https://wsc.nmbe.ch / https://doi.org/10.24436/2 Google Scholar

42.

Yao ZY & Li SQ 2013New and little known pholcid spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae) from Laos. – Zootaxa3709: 1–51 –  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3709.1.1 Google Scholar

43.

Zonstein SL, Marusik YM & Omelko M 2015A survey of spider taxa new to Israel (Arachnida: Araneae). – Zoology in the Middle East61: 372–385 –  https://doi.org/10.1080/09397140.2015.1095525 Google Scholar
Enrico Schifani, Antonino Dentici, Letizia Alleruzzo, and Piergiorgio Di Pompeo "Spermophora senoculata on Sicily/Italy (Araneae: Pholcidae)," Arachnologische Mitteilungen: Arachnology Letters 58(1), 6-8, (18 June 2019). https://doi.org/10.30963/aramit5803
Received: 1 November 2019; Accepted: 5 May 2019; Published: 18 June 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE
3 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top