Translator Disclaimer
1 February 2009 Characterizing Betula Litwinowii Seedling Microsites at the Alpine-Treeline Ecotone, Central Greater Caucasus Mountains, Georgia
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Seedling establishment is an important factor dictating the altitudinal limits of treeline species. Factors which affect seedling mortality and survival, however, have yet to be fully characterized, especially for deciduous treeline species. Here we describe microsite characteristics of successfully established Betula litwinowii seedlings at the alpine-treeline ecotone. Possible harmful effects of sky exposure on seedling physiology (i.e. photoinhibition of photosynthesis) were also examined, as well as possible facilitative effects of co-occurring Rhododendron caucasicum shrubs on northern slopes and microtopographical depressions (mainly watercourses) in ridgetop meadows. On northern slopes, seedling density was highest in newly exposed soils, with 90% of the youngest seedlings (<2 cm) occurring in patches of rocky, bare, or moss-covered soils within the Rhododendron thicket. R. caucasicum was not a significant source of shade for B. litwinowii, as most seedlings were established 0.25–0.5 m away from the nearest shrub, and shade cover generated by R. caucasicum was observed in only 1% of seedlings at midday. On ridgetops, density of B. litwinowii was sixfold higher inside microtopographical depressions compared to outside. Sky exposure of seedlings within depressions was similar to northern slopes, ranging from 50% to 87%. Across all microsites, seedlings were most abundant under 70–87% sky exposure. This preference for open microsites, combined with the observation that sustained photoinhibition of photosynthesis (Fv/Fm < 0.65) was observed only in the most open microsites (i.e. >80% sky exposure), suggests that sky exposure is likely not a significant factor affecting seedling mortality in B. litwinowii, in contrast to results reported for conifer and broadleaf evergreen species at treeline. A higher photosynthetic capacity and a deciduous life history may provide both tolerance and avoidance to the physiological stresses associated with high sky exposure for B. litwinowii seedlings, and other factors, such as soil moisture, more likely account for successful establishment within microtopographical depressions and R. caucasicum thickets.

Introduction

Seedling establishment is a necessary component of timberline and treeline migration to a new altitude, as well as the contraction or expansion of the subalpine forest (Smith et al., 2003). Yet, mortality during this early life stage (particularly the first year of growth) may be the highest of all life stages (Germino and Smith, 1999; Maher and Germino, 2006; Bader et al., 2007a). For this reason, seedling (and/or ramet) establishment is a particularly important factor influencing the altitudinal limits of treeline species (Smith et al., 2008). Despite the importance of this life stage, however, microsite features associated with successful seedling establishment have yet to be fully characterized, especially for the less common deciduous treeline species. The large majority of research on seedlings at the alpine-treeline ecotone has focused on evergreen, coniferous tree species (e.g. Knapp and Smith, 1982; Anderson and Winterton, 1996; Germino et al., 2002). Because deciduous and evergreen life history strategies involve distinct physiological and structural traits (e.g. differences in water use efficiency, structural and biochemical traits associated with leaf longevity, nitrogen allocation, freezing tolerance, and photosynthetic capacity), it is possible that the factors which most strongly dictate seedling survival (and thus, altitudinal limits) for one group may be very different from those affecting the other.

Betula litwinowii Doluch. is a dominant, deciduous treeline species in the Kazbegi region of the Central Greater Caucasus Mountains (Fig. 1A) (Dolukhanov, 1978; Nakhutsrishvili, 1999). Beyond the timberline (c. 2250 m), individuals of B. litwinowii occur in two general habitats: on north-facing slopes dominated by Rhododendron caucasicum Pall. shrubs (which extend the treeline up to c. 2500 m; Fig. 1B), and in microtopographical depressions (ranging from small divots to watercourses) on exposed ridgetops (c. 2500 m; Fig. 1C) (Akhalkatsi et al., 2006). The co-occurrence of R. caucasicum with B. litwinowii has led some to suggest that the R. caucasicum provides a nurse-plant benefit to B. litwinowii seedlings, as reductions in sky exposure might benefit seedlings by buffering night and daytime temperature extremes, and/or reduce photoinhibition of photosynthesis during early establishment (Dona and Galen, 2007), similar to microsite characteristics associated with conifer seedling establishment at treeline (Germino and Smith, 1999; Maher and Germino, 2006; Akhalkatsi et al., 2006). The effects of microtopographical depressions on seedling establishment are also unclear, though they too may play a role in reducing sky exposure, as seedlings appear to commonly establish only on north-facing depression walls (Akhalkatsi et al., 2006). However, neither of these relationships has been quantitatively assessed, nor have the specific microsites above the timberline in which B. litwinowii seedlings are establishing been characterized in any detail. Such information may be valuable for predicting the movement of the alpine-treeline ecotone in a warming climate (e.g. Kullman, 2007), as well as for local re-forestation efforts to remediate human impacts (e.g. over-grazing). Here we characterize the microsites of successfully established B. litwinowii seedlings beyond the timberline according to groundcover type, percent sky exposure, photoinhibition of photosynthesis, and proximity to possible facilitative objects (vegetative and topographic). We also evaluate the spatial association between B. litwinowii seedlings, R. caucasicum shrubs, and topographical depressions to identify possible relationships with successful seedling establishment in B. litwinowii.

Figure 1

Research site. (A) Site map. (B) Northern slope, consisting of (from right to left) timberline, Rhododendron thicket with open patches (where Betula litwinowii seedlings were most commonly found), and ridgetop meadow. (C) Watercourse on ridgetop with dwarf B. litwinowii individuals and seedling.

i1523-0430-41-1-112-f01.gif

Materials and Methods

Study Site

The study site is located approximately 400 m above the timberline, at the uppermost elevation in the Kazbegi region of the Central Greater Caucasus Mountains (c. 2498 m a.s.l.; 42°39′N; 44°37′E) at which isolated adult (>1.25 m) birch trees are found. The site is situated at the interface of a continuous ridgetop and north-facing macroslope (42°40′01″N, 44°35′49″E), with B. litwinowii forest occurring along the east–west ridgeline extending upwards from the Tergi River valley (c. 1900 m) towards Mt. Kazbegi (5033 m) (Fig. 1A) (Akhalkatsi et al., 2006). The upper altitude limit of the birch forest occurs below the 11°C minimum isotherms of August, although a 9.5°C isotherm occurs in areas protected by snow cover (Nakhutsrishvili, 1999). Vegetation above the timberline is dominated by R. caucasicum shrubs on the northern slope, and sedges (Carex medwedewii and/or C. tristis) on the ridgetop meadow (Fig. 1B). Detailed information on topography, geomorphology, soil, climate, and vegetation of this region is given in Nakhutsrishvili (1999, 2003) and Nakhutsrishvili et al. (2005). The biotope diversity in the alpine-treeline ecotone, as well as a history of the forest vegetation of the Kazbegi region, are also discussed in Nakhutsrishvili et al. (2006). This region of the Central Caucasus Mountains consists of a series of relatively steep, parallel ridges with similar vegetation pattern (birch forests on northern slopes only). All measurements were made in September 2007. Visual inspection of seedlings at the site and general area revealed no evidence of invertebrate herbivory on seedlings; furthermore, grazing livestock were known to have not inhabited this particular site in recent history, as the area is a designated research site.

Seedling Microsite Characterization

Seedlings were defined roughly as individuals <25 cm in height (ground to apical tip), and were grouped into four height classes (0–2 cm, 2–5 cm, 5–10 cm, and 10–25 cm). Estimated ages according to node counts were <2 yrs, 2–3 yrs, 3–4 yrs, and 4–7 yrs, respectively. B. litwinowii does not reproduce clonally via ramets, therefore all juvenile individuals reported here had developed as individuals from seedlings. All seedlings encountered in individual plots were sampled, which totaled 78 individuals. For each individual, groundcover, percent sky exposure, occurrence in either sun or shade at midday (1100–1500 h), and distance to the nearest potential facilitative object that could have possibly shaded the seedling during germination and early growth were recorded (i.e. topographical structures >3 cm in height, or plant structure >25 cm in height). Groundcover was categorized based on the dominant vegetation and/or soil appearance for the 5 cm radius around the seedling. Groundcover type either consisted of small rocks (<1 cm diameter), bare soil, mossy soil, Empetrum caucasicum (a prostrate, mat-forming evergreen dwarf shrub), sedges (Carex medwedewii and/or C. tristis), or leaf litter. The degree of sky exposure for each individual was quantified based on hemispherical photographs of the canopy taken at seedling heights. Digital images were imported into Gap Light Analyzer software (Version 2.0, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, and Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York, U.S.A.) and used to calculate the fraction of the hemispherical image not obscured by objects (i.e. percent sky exposure). These data were compared to those for two evergreen, conifer species from the Rocky Mountains, U.S.A. (Abies lasiocarpa and Picea englemannii, adapted from Germino and Smith, 1999), which inhabit environments with similar geologic histories, precipitation, and soil/air temperatures (Bock et al., 1995).

Association Between B. Litwinowii and R. Caucasicum

Ten 20 m transects were spaced 10 m apart along the northern slope above timberline where R. caucasicum shrubs and B. litwinowii co-occur (Fig. 1B). For each transect, ten 1 × 1 m quadrats were spaced at 2 m intervals. Within each quadrat, B. litwinowii individuals were counted and assigned an age class based on height: seedling (0–25 cm), juvenile (26–50 cm), small adult (0.5–1.25 m), and adult (>1.25 m). Individuals were recorded as occurring either in the open (>25 cm from the nearest Rhododendron), under sparse Rhododendron cover (soil covered with Rhododendron ramets sparse enough to still see ground beneath), or under dense Rhododendron (only Rhododendron shrubs visible from eye level; shrubs were pulled back to search for smaller individuals). Seedlings observed in this study were not the same seedlings observed in the microsite characterization study described in the previous section.

Topographical Effects on B. Litwinowii Distribution

In addition to occurring on northern slopes within the Rhododendron thicket, B. litwinowii seedlings also establish in the exposed, ridgetop meadows above the Rhododendron shrubline (Fig. 1B), though establishment appears dependent on the occurrence of 3 cm–1 m microtopographical depressions (formed by freeze-thaw cycles, erosion, and/or watercourses; Fig. 1C). In order to determine whether individuals were more likely to occur in these topographical depressions, ten 20 m transects were spaced 10 m apart along the ridgetop. For each transect, ten 1 × 1 m quadrats were spaced at 2 m intervals. Because of pruning effects on plant morphology (especially height) on the highly wind-exposed ridgetop, height was not always a reliable indicator of relative age, so the terms “seedling, juvenile, young adult, and adult” were not used, though height was still recorded and used to classify individuals. In each quadrat, the number of B. litwinowii individuals was recorded according to height class (0–25 cm, 25–50 cm, 0.5–1.25 m), and as either being rooted on flat soil (i.e. not associated with a depression), on a raised area within the depression (flush with flat soil), or within a depression.

Sustained Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis

In order to determine whether sky exposure resulted in sustained photoinhibition of photosynthesis, sustained quantum yield efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) was measured at midday (1100–1300 h) using a PAM Fluorescence System (Hansatech Institute, model FMS-2, Cambridge, U.K.) for all B. litwinowii individuals <25 cm in height for which sky exposure measurements had been taken. These values were plotted against percent sky exposure for a total of 46 individuals. Prior to each measurement, one leaf from each individual was dark-adapted for 45 min using model FMS-2 leaf clips, and the seedling's percent sky exposure was measured as described previously.

Statistical Analyses

Because this study only characterized seedling microsites on one ridgeline, all replication and corresponding comparisons were within-site. However, visits to additional ridgetop sites in the area revealed an identical vegetation pattern, in general. Regardless, the authors recognize that replication between sites was not carried out in this study.

To determine whether B. litwinowii individuals on northern slopes were more likely to be rooted in open soils, under sparse Rhododendron canopy cover, or dense Rhododendron canopy cover, a Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare total numbers of individuals observed in each site type versus numbers expected under the null hypothesis for each of the three habitat types. Separate tests were run for each of the four age classes. A Pearson's chi-square test was also used to determine whether B. litwinowii individuals on the ridgeline were more likely to occur within microtopographical depressions, on raised centers within the depressions, or upon adjacent flat soil microsites. Separate tests were run for each of the three height classes observed. Significance for all tests was determined as p < 0.05.

A non-linear regression (modified Hyperbola III) was used to evaluate the relationship between percent sky exposure [independent] to Fv/Fm [dependent] (Sigma Plot V2.0, Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, California, U.S.A.).

Results

Groundcover and Association With R. Caucasicum

The youngest seedlings observed on northern slopes (<2 cm in height) were typically associated with early successional groundcover. Forty-eight percent of seedlings were found among rocks, 14% in open soil, and 28% in moss-covered soil (Fig. 2). Empetrum caucasicum comprised the remaining 10% of ground cover associated with these seedlings. Growth of B. litwinowii appeared to correspond with procession of groundcover succession, with younger individuals being more common in rocky and moss-covered soils, and older individuals more common among Empetrum and sedges (Carex medwedewii and/or C. tristis) (Fig. 2). Percent values for each of these observations are given in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Groundcover associated with four age classes of Betula litwinowii seedlings. N  =  21 for seedlings < 2 cm; between 2 and 5 cm, n  =  14; between 5 and 10 cm, n  =  16, and seedlings between 10 and 25 cm, n  =  27.

i1523-0430-41-1-112-f02.gif

B. litwinowii seedlings (<25 cm in height) were never observed to be rooted beneath R. caucasicum canopies (sparse or dense), but rather, were only rooted in soil with no R. caucasicum canopy cover (χ2  =  90, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, seedlings were only rarely observed <5 cm from the nearest R. caucasicum shrub (Figs. 3A and 3B), as most seedlings were >25 cm away from the nearest leaf of a Rhododendron. The highest density of juvenile (26–50 cm) and young adult (0.5–1.25 m) trees occurred under thin R. caucasicum canopies, though this was only significant for young adults (χ2  =  0.82, p  =  0.67; and χ2  =  7.2, p  =  0.028 for juvenile and young adult trees, respectively). Adults (>1.25 m) were found in similar densities between all site types (χ2  =  2.80, p  =  0.25). B. litwinowii density for all age classes was lowest in dense R. caucasicum canopies.

Figure 3

Association of Betula litwinowii with Rhododendron caucasicum shrubs. (A) Mean Betula density (by age class) according to Rhododendron density in 1 m2 transect plots. Open  =  no Rhododendron within 25 cm of individuals. Sparse Rhododendron  =  individual rooted beneath a Rhododendron canopy sparse enough to still see the ground beneath. Dense Rhododendron  =  individual rooted beneath a Rhododendron canopy too dense to see ground beneath without moving branches. (B) Percent seedlings (individuals < 25 cm in height) observed at incremental distances from the nearest leaf of a Rhododendron shrub (n  =  77).

i1523-0430-41-1-112-f03.gif

Association With Microtopographical Depressions Above The Rhododendron Shrubline

Mean B. litwinowii density for all three age classes observed was over sixfold higher in microtopographical depressions than either on raised areas within the depressions or on flat soil—a difference which was highly significant for all 3 height classes (χ2  =  35.7 for individuals 0–25 cm in height, 29.4 for individuals 25–50 cm, and 7 for individuals 0.5–1.25 m, with 2 degrees of freedom; p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p  =  0.0302, respectively) (Fig. 4). On average, B. litwinowii density in depressions was 0.33 individuals m−2 for trees <25 cm in height, 0.33 for trees between 25 and 50 cm in height, and 0.06 for trees between 0.05 and 1.25 m in height. On raised areas within depressions, only 0.05, 0.08, and 0.01 individuals m−2 were observed for these three height classes respectively, and for flat surfaces, 0.04, 0.04, and 0 individuals m−2. No trees taller than 1.25 m were observed on ridgetops, as the majority of B. litwinowii observed on the ridgetops were dwarf individuals <50 cm in height (likely due to pruning effects of high wind).

Figure 4

Association of Betula litwinowii with topographical depressions on ridgetop meadows. Bars represent mean number of individuals (according to height) observed in 1 m2 transects rooted either (1) within a topographical depression, (2) on top of the raised soil within a polyhedral depression, or (3) on flat soil (not associated with a depression).

i1523-0430-41-1-112-f04.gif

Sky Exposure and Photoinhibition

B. litwinowii seedlings were observed more frequently in microsites on northern slopes characterized by moderately high sky exposure. Seedlings <25 cm in height were only observed in microsites characterized by 45–86% sky exposure (Fig. 5A). The greatest proportion of the seedlings observed were in sites with 70–79% canopy openness (41%), followed by 80–89% (30%). A comparison of these data with those for two evergreen, conifer species (Abies lasiocarpa and Picea englemannii, adapted from Germino and Smith, 1999) is shown in Figure 5B. Fluorescence data showed that the majority of B. litwinowii seedlings only exhibited mild sustained photoinhibition (as evidenced by Fv/Fm values between 0.69 and 0.80) at midday (Fig. 5C; r2  =  0.33, p < 0.001.). However, some seedlings in the most exposed sites (i.e. greater than 80% sky exposure) did show more drastic declines in Fv/Fm (down to 0.50), suggesting a greater degree of photoinhibition of photosynthesis. At midday (1100–1300 h), 54% of seedlings observed were in full sunlight, 37% were in shade provided by topography, and only 8.6% were in shade provided by vegetation (usually other B. litwinowii; only once was a seedling observed to be in the shadow of a R. caucasicum shrub) (Fig. 5D).

Figure 5

Betula litwinowii seedling distribution and sustained photoinhibition according to sky exposure. (A) Seedling distribution according to sky exposure of all Betula seedlings observed (height < 25 cm) (n  =  107). (B) Comparison of seedling distribution according to sky exposure for Betula, compared to two evergreen treeline species from the Rocky Mountains, U.S.A. (all seedlings < 5 cm in height). Data for Abies and Picea adapted from Germino and Smith (1999). (Betula n  =  19; Abies n  =  21; Picea n  =  74). (C) Midday sustained photoinhibition of photosynthesis for B. litwinowii as a function of canopy cover (i.e. 1 – sky exposure); r2  =  0.33, p < 0.001. (D) Percent of seedlings observed at midday (between 1100 and 1300 h) either exposed to full sunlight (“No Shade”), in shade provided by plants (“Plants”), or in shade provided by topography (“Topography); n  =  77.

i1523-0430-41-1-112-f05.gif

Discussion

Young B. litwinowii individuals (<25 cm in height) occurring on northern slopes within the Rhododendron shrub thicket were primarily established in open areas with either rocky, open, or moss-covered soils, characterized by 70–90% sky exposure (Figs. 2 and 5A). Seedling age (height) appeared to correspond with groundcover succession in these sites, with young seedlings being found in rocky, bare, and moss-covered soils, and larger individuals among Empetrum and sedges (Fig. 2), and eventually, R. caucasicum (Fig. 3A). Consistent with this pattern of successional association, B. litwinowii seedlings were only rarely observed growing closer than 5 cm in proximity to R. caucasicum shrubs (a later successional species), with most seedlings being found from 0.25 m to over 1 m from the nearest leaf of any R. caucasicum shrub (Figs. 3A and 3B). Only older individuals of Betula (>25 cm) were found rooted beneath R. caucasicum canopies, suggesting that Rhododendron established later than Betula in these microsites. Furthermore, densities of all age classes of B. litwinowii were lowest among dense R. caucasicum shrubs (Fig. 3A). These data, combined with the observation that over 50% of seedlings were in full sunlight at midday, and that shade, when present, was more commonly due to topography (steep slope and northern aspect) than vegetation (Fig. 5D), suggest that B. litwinowii seedlings are most likely not dependent on shade from R. caucasicum shrubs for establishment as suggested in Akhalkatsi et al. (2006). Rather, it appears that the understory environment of R. caucasicum shrubs is inhibitory to seedling germination. These results are consistent with those of Shrestha et al. (2007), who showed that seedlings of Betula utilis (another treeline species) could not establish under their own closed canopy.

The absence of the youngest seedlings beneath Rhododendron canopies may be attributed to such factors as a lack of open soil due to a dense litter layer (possibly inhibiting radicle establishment), decreased moisture in the leaf litter, potentially allelopathic chemicals (Nilsen et al., 1999), burial under litter (Lei et al., 2002), and/or a lack of sufficient sunlight penetrating the overstory canopy (Catovsky and Bazzaz, 2000; Lei et al., 2002; Thomas et al., 2002). The absence of B. litwinowii above timberline on north-facing slopes lacking R. caucasicum (Nakhutsrishvili, 2003), however, suggests that either Rhododendron and Betula have overlapping habitat preference, or that Rhododendron enhances B. litwinowii survival above timberline by some other means. For example, it is known that Rhododendron increases snow capture on northern slopes during winter, and moisture trapping is another common means by which nurse plants may facilitate seedling survival (e.g. Castro et al., 2004). Indeed, survival of most birch species is known to be dependent on relatively high soil moisture (Carlton and Bazzaz, 1998), and survival of B. utilis has also been shown to correspond with topographical features associated with high soil moisture (e.g. north-facing aspect, watercourses) (Shrestha et al., 2007). Therefore, the significant association of B. litwinowii with microtopographical depressions on ridgetops (Fig. 4) may also be due to moisture differences, rather than shading effects, as depressions effectively accumulate blowing snow and rainfall, but sky exposure at seedling microsites within depressions were sometimes observed to be as high as 83% (data not shown). However, it is also possible that seedlings establishing within these microtopographical depressions are experiencing less herbivory or trampling by grazers or large herbivores than seedlings in the open (Bock et al., 1995), though no grazing is known to have occurred in this site in recent history. Even so, this explanation would only apply to seedlings in the ridgetop meadow, as the Rhododendron thicket is generally impenetrable to livestock.

One of the most striking aspects of the data presented here is the high percent sky exposure characteristic of Betula seedling microsites relative to those documented for evergreen, conifer treeline species, such as Abies lasiocarpa and Picea englemannii (Fig. 5B), and Pinus albicaulis (Germino and Smith, 1999; Maher and Germino, 2006). The youngest B. litwinowii seedlings (<5 cm) we observed were found only in sites with 60–86% sky exposure—a much more open and narrower range of habitat than has been reported for Abies, Picea, and Pinus spp. seedlings, which generally require shade to establish (Germino and Smith, 1999; Maher and Germino, 2006). Specifically, mean percent sky exposure for B. litwinowii seedlings was 74%—a value 10% higher than Picea (64%) and 20% higher than Abies (54%) (Fig. 5B; data adapted from Germino and Smith, 1999). However, data from Maher and Germino (2006), which include Abies and Picea seedling data from additional sites, suggest that this difference may be as high as 40% and 50%, respectively. Similarly, seedlings of Pinus spp. also appear to establish in more shaded sites, averaging only ca. 27% sky exposure (Maher and Germino, 2006). Artificial shade was also necessary for evergreen tree seedling survival at Ecuadorian treelines in the Andes (Bader et al., 2007a, 2007b) and in the Australian Alps (Ball et al., 1991).

One explanation for B. litwinowii's ability to establish in more sun-exposed sites relative to these evergreen, conifer species is its relatively higher photosynthetic capacity. At the time of study, B. litwinowii showed a maximum photosynthetic capacity of ca. 14 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 (data not shown)—40% higher than the average for Picea (10 µmol m−2 s−1), and 130% higher than Abies (6 µmol m−2 s−1) (Germino and Smith, 1999). It is known that a decreased capacity for photosynthesis renders plants intrinsically more vulnerable to photoinhibition, due to a reduction in energy sinks available for energy dissipation (i.e. photochemical quenching; Osmond, 1981; Powles, 1984) and may also reduce their capacity for root growth and/or mycorrhizal infection (Cui and Smith, 1991; Miller et al., 1998). Indeed, seedlings and juveniles of species with the highest photosynthetic capacities have been shown to tolerate the greatest sky exposure (Germino and Smith, 2000; Maher and Germino, 2006). Consistent with this explanation, only mild sustained photoinhibition of photosynthesis was observed at midday for the majority of seedlings measured, with midday Fv/Fm values dropping below 0.65 only when percent sky exposure was greater than ca. 80% (Fig. 5C). Because broadleaf and deciduous life histories are both generally associated with higher photosynthetic capacities relative to those of needle-leafed evergreens (Field et al., 1983; Warren and Adams, 2004), such a distinct pattern in treeline seedling microsite preference might be expected.

In addition to a higher photosynthetic capacity, the absence of leaves in deciduous species during colder, more stressful seasons may be another reason Betula seedlings are capable of successfully colonizing these more exposed microsites, as perhaps damage incurred during winter stress in evergreens would render establishment in these sites too costly. This idea is supported by high seedling mortality in evergreen treeline species during winter in sites characterized by high sky exposure (Germino et al., 2002; Maher et al., 2005), as well as the general lack of local evergreen species (Rhododendron caucasicum) in the more exposed sites where B. litwinowii establishment was observed (such as the ridgetop meadows) (Akhalkatsi et al., 2006). Furthermore, because many of the physiological stresses related to sky exposure are greatest during the winter (e.g. temperature extremes, membrane and molecular destabilization, frost damage, and low-temperature photoinhibition of photosynthesis), deciduous species largely avoid the major consequences of establishing in open microsites. This may therefore be another factor which explains why protection from sky exposure is not as critical for Betula seedling survival compared to evergreens (e.g. Ball et al., 1991; Germino et al., 2002; Maher et al., 2005; Maher and Germino, 2006 ).

In conclusion, although some factors associated with seedlings survival at the alpine-treeline ecotone do appear to be shared between evergreen and deciduous treeline species (e.g. microsites which promote soil moisture), others are in contrast (protection from sky exposure). We have demonstrated that R. caucasicum is most likely not facilitating B. litwinowii seedling establishment via shading as suggested in Akhalkatsi et al. (2006), although enhancement of snow capture (and thus, protection from extreme winter low temperatures, and enhanced soil moisture from snowmelt) by Rhododendron may enhance seedling germination and survival along northern slopes. This explanation is consistent with the occurrence of B. litwinowii in microtopographical depressions on exposed ridgetops, though more research is needed on the effects of snow pack accumulation, soil moisture, and temperature to test these hypotheses.

Acknowledgments

Support was provided by the Georgian Research Development Foundation in collaboration with the Georgia-USA Bi-lateral Grants Program (Award GEB2-3341-TB-06), Civilian Research and Development Foundation, U.S. Department of the Interior. The U.S. National Science Foundation (Ecological and Evolutionary Physiology Program) also contributed partial support. A special thanks to William K. Smith for providing critical reviews that improved the manuscript. The services provided by the Georgian staff of the Kazbegi Research Station are most gratefully acknowledged.

References Cited

1.

M. Akhalkatsi, O. Abdaladze, G. Nakhtsrishvili, and W. K. Smith . 2006. Facilitation of seedling microsites by Rhododendron caucasicum extends the Betula litwinowii treeline, Caucasus Mountains, Republic of Georgia. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 38:481–488. Google Scholar

2.

L. J. Anderson and A. J. Winterton . 1996. Germination as a determinant of seedling distributions among natural substrates in Picea engelmannii (Pinaceae) and Abies lasiocarpa (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 83:112–117. Google Scholar

3.

M. Y. Bader, I. van Geloof, and M. Rietkerk . 2007a. High solar radiation hinders tree establishment above the alpine treeline in northern Ecuador. Plant Ecology 191:33–45. Google Scholar

4.

M. Y. Bader, M. Rietkerk, and A. K. Bregt . 2007b. Vegetation structure and temperature regimes of tropical alpine treelines. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 39:353–364. Google Scholar

5.

M. C. Ball, V. S. Hodges, and G. P. Laughlin . 1991. Cold-induced photoinhibition limits regeneration of snow gum at treeline. Functional Ecology 5:663–668. Google Scholar

6.

J. H. Bock, C. L. Jolls, and A. C. Lewis . 1995. The effects of grazing on alpine vegetation: a comparison of the Central Caucasus, Republic of Georgia, with the Colorado Rocky Mountains, U.S.A. Arctic and Alpine Research 27:130–136. Google Scholar

7.

G. C. Carlton and F. A. Bazzaz . 1998. Regeneration of three sympatric birch species on experimental hurricane blowdown microsites. Ecological Monographs 68:99–120. Google Scholar

8.

J. Castro, R. Zamora, J. A. Hódar, and J. M. Gómez . 2004. Seedling establishment of a boreal tree species (Pinus sylvestris) at its southernmost distribution limit: consequences of being in a marginal Mediterranean habitat. Journal of Ecology 92:266–277. Google Scholar

9.

S. Catovsky and F. A. Bazzaz . 2000. The role of resource interactions and seedling regeneration in maintaining a positive feedback in hemlock stands. Journal of Ecology 88:100–112. Google Scholar

10.

M. Cui and W. K. Smith . 1991. Photosynthesis, water relations and mortality in Abies lasiocarpa seedlings during natural establishment. Tree Physiology 8:37–46. Google Scholar

11.

A. G. Dolukhanov 1978. Timberline and subalpine belt in Caucasus Mountains, USSR. Arctic and Alpine Research 10:409–422. Google Scholar

12.

A. J. Dona and C. Galen . 2007. Nurse effects of alpine willows (Salix) enhance over-winter survival at the upper range limit of fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 39:7–64. Google Scholar

13.

C. Field, J. Merino, and H. A. Mooney . 1983. Compromises between water-use efficiency and nitrogen-use efficiency in five species of California evergreens. Oecologia 60:384–389. Google Scholar

14.

M. J. Germino and W. K. Smith . 1999. Sky exposure, crown architecture, and low-temperature photoinhibition in conifer seedlings at alpine treeline. Plant, Cell and Environment 22:407–415. Google Scholar

15.

M. J. Germino and W. K. Smith . 2000. Differences in microsite, plant form, and low-temperature photoinhibition in alpine plants. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 32:388–396. Google Scholar

16.

M. J. Germino, W. K. Smith, and A. C. Resor . 2002. Conifer seedling distribution and survival in an alpine-treeline ecotone. Plant Ecology 162:157–168. Google Scholar

17.

A. K. Knapp and W. K. Smith . 1982. Factors influencing understory seedling establishment of Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii) and subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa). Canadian Journal of Botany 60:2753–2761. Google Scholar

18.

L. Kullman 2007. Tree line population monitoring of Pinus sylvestris in the Swedish Scandes, 1973–2005: implications for tree line theory and climate change ecology. Journal of Ecology 95:41–52. Google Scholar

19.

T. T. Lei, S. W. Semones, J. F. Walker, B. D. Clinton, and E. T. Nilsen . 2002. Effects of Rhododendron maximum thickets on tree seed dispersal, seedling morphology, and survivorship. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163:991–1000. Google Scholar

20.

E. L. Maher and M. J. Germino . 2006. Microsite differentiation among conifer species during seedling establishment at alpine treeline. Ecoscience 13:334–341. Google Scholar

21.

E. L. Maher, M. J. Germino, and N. J. Hasselquist . 2005. Interactive effects of tree and herb cover on survivorship, physiology, and microclimate of conifer seedlings at the alpine tree-line ecotone. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35:567–574. Google Scholar

22.

S. L. Miller, T. M. McClean, N. L. Stanton, and S. E. Williams . 1998. Survivability, physiognomy and mycorrhization of first year conifer seedlings following fire in Grand Teton National Park. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28:115–122. Google Scholar

23.

G. Nakhutsrishvili 1999. The vegetation of Georgia (Caucasus). Braun-Blanquetia 15:5–74. Google Scholar

24.

G. Nakhutsrishvili 2003. In L. Nagy, G. Grabherr, Ch Körner, and D. B A. Tompson . High mountain vegetation of the Caucasus region. Alpine Biodiversity in Europe. Ecological Studies, vol. 167. Berlin and New York Springer. 93–103. Google Scholar

25.

G. Nakhutsrishvili, O. Abdaladze, and A. Kikodze . 2005. Khevi, Kazbegi Region. Tbilisi Institute of Botany. 54. Google Scholar

26.

G. Nakhutsrishvili, O. Abdaladze, and M. Akhalkatsi . 2006. In D. Gafta and J. Akeroyd . Biotope types of the treeline of the Central Greater Caucasus. Nature Conservation (Concepts and Practice). Berlin-Heidelberg Springer-Verlag. 211–225. Google Scholar

27.

E. T. Nilsen, J. F. Walker, O. K. Miller, S. W. Semones, T. T. Lei, and B. D. Clinton . 1999. Inhibition of canopy tree seedlings by Rhododendron maximum: could allelopathy be a cause. American Journal of Botany 86:1597–1605. Google Scholar

28.

C. B. Osmond 1981. Photorespiration and photoinhibition; some implications for the energetics of photosynthesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 639:77–98. Google Scholar

29.

S. B. Powles 1984. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 35:14–44. Google Scholar

30.

B. B. Shrestha, B. Ghimire, H. D. Lekhak, and P. K. Jha . 2007. Regeneration of treeline birch (Betula utilis D. Don) forest in a trans-Himalayan dry valley in central Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 27:259–267. Google Scholar

31.

W. K. Smith, M. J. Germino, T. E. Hancock, and D. M. Johnson . 2003. Another perspective on the altitudinal occurrence of alpine treeline. Tree Physiology 23:1101–1112. Google Scholar

32.

W. K. Smith, D. M. Johnson, and K. S. Reinhardt . 2008. In S. E. Jorgensen and B. Fath . Alpine forests. Encyclopedia of Ecology. Amsterdam Elsevier Press. Google Scholar

33.

L. T. Thomas, S. W. Semones, J. F. Walker, B. D. Clinton, and E. T. Nilsen . 2002. Effects of Rhododendron maximum thickets on tree seed dispersal, seedling morphology, and survivorship. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163:991–1000. Google Scholar

34.

C. R. Warren and M. A. Adams . 2004. Evergreen trees do not maximize instantaneous photosynthesis. Trends in Plant Science 9:270–274. Google Scholar
Nicole M. Hughes, Daniel M. Johnson, Maia Akhalkatsi, and Otar Abdaladze "Characterizing Betula Litwinowii Seedling Microsites at the Alpine-Treeline Ecotone, Central Greater Caucasus Mountains, Georgia," Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 41(1), 112-118, (1 February 2009). https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430-41.1.112
Accepted: 1 September 2008; Published: 1 February 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top