Translator Disclaimer
1 May 2015 Different Responses of Soil Respiration and Its Components to Experimental Warming with Contrasting Soil Water Content
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Soil water content (SWC) regulation on the responses of soil respiration (Rs), autotrophic respiration (Ra), and heterotrophic respiration (Rh) to warming are rarely investigated in alpine meadow ecosystem in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP). We conducted a warming experiment to investigate how SWC regulates the responses of Rs and its components (Ra and Rh) to warming. Infrared heaters were used to simulate climatic warming. Soil respiration was measured inside surface collars (2–3 cm deep) and Rh was measured inside deep collars (50 cm deep), which excludes root respiration. Autotrophic respiration was calculated by subtracting Rh from Rs. Warming increased the average Rs and Rh by 9.9% and 12.7% but had no significant effect on Ra. Interaction between warming and SWC had significant effect on Rs and its components. Soil respiration and Ra decreased by 5.8% and 36.3% in dry conditions, but they increased by 23.5% and 47.7% in wet conditions. Growing season above-ground biomass was enhanced by 0.1 kg m-2 in wet conditions but reduced by 0.10 kg m-2 in dry conditions under warming manipulation. The estimated net ecosystem carbon (C) balance was 0.65 and -0.16 kg m-2 in wet and dry conditions, respectively, which indicates a net C emission of alpine meadow in wet but a net C sequestration in dry conditions. Our results emphasize the importance of incorporating SWC in simulation of ecosystem carbon balance under a warming climate.

Introduction

Soil contains the largest carbon (C) pool on the Earth and emits 68 to 80 Pg C per year to the atmosphere by soil respiration (Rs), which is the second largest C flux between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems (Raich and Schlesinger, 1992). The annual C efflux from soil is ten times greater than the C emission from fossil fuel combustion. Thus a small warming-induced change in Rs could significantly aggravate or mitigate the buildup of CO2 in the atmosphere (Cox et al., 2000; Friedlingstein et al., 2006). For example, an increase of 1 °C in air temperature would cause 10%–28% more C release (11–34 Pg C yr-1) to the atmosphere (Schimel et al., 1994).

Soil respiration consists of two major components: autotrophic respiration (Ra) from plant roots and their symbionts, and heterotrophic respiration (Rh) from litter and soil organic C decomposition (Hanson et al., 2000), which have different implications for ecosystem C balance. In general Ra consumes photosynthate recently fixed by the canopy, hence it has little impact on annual net ecosystem C balance (Hogberg et al., 2001), whereas Rh decomposes old C in the form of soil organic C and litter, which might activate more C into the ecosystem C cycling (Trumbore, 2000). Responses of Ra and Rh to warming could be consistent increase (Schindlbacher et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2007), consistent decline (Zhou et al., 2010), or contrast (Li et al., 2013). The consistent or contrasting responses of Ra and Rh bring about diverse response of Rs to climatic warming. Most studies show significant increase in Rs (Rustad et al., 2001; Wu et al., 2011) due to higher activity of microbes and roots (Biasi et al., 2008; Emmett et al., 2004), or due to enhanced C input from plant uptake and allocation to the roots (Luo et al., 2009). However, some studies also find a decrease in dry condition because of the reduction in above-ground plant activity and the corresponding decline in Ra resulted from soil water stress, or because soil drying inhibited Rh more than soil warming enhanced it (Saleska et al., 1999), or owing to limitation in gas diffusion, nutrients availability to plants and microorganisms, and the potential for soil anoxia in wet condition (Pacific et al., 2009).

Permafrost thaw affects the soil water saturation and thus will change the soil oxygen and influence soil C decomposition in tundra under a warming climate (Schuur et al., 2009). Decomposition in oxic soils releases primarily CO2, whereas anoxic decomposition produces both CH4 and CO2 but at a lower emission rate. Ecosystem respiration is inhibited in wet and moist tundra because of soil anoxia resulted from soil water saturation, whereas it is stimulated in dry tundra (Oberbauer et al., 2007; Shaver et al., 2000). Alpine meadow in the permafrost area in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) stores 0.22 Pg C (Tao et al., 2007) and is estimated to lose 1.8 Gg C from 1986 to 2000 due to warming and grazing (Wang et al., 2008). Studies show a decrease of soil moisture in surface layer (Klein et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2011) but an increase in deep layers under warming (Xu et al., 2015). Compared to the Arctic tundra, alpine meadow is well drained, thus we hypothesize that responses of Rs and its components to warming in alpine meadow are different from those in Arctic tundra in sites with different soil water content (SWC).

Materials and Methods

SITE DESCRIPTION

The study site is situated in the source region of the Yangtze River and in the middle of the QTP (Fig.1, part A, 92°56′E, 34°49′N) with mean altitude of 4635 m and typical alpine climate (Fig.1, part B). Mean annual temperature is -3.8 °C with a minimum of -27.9 °C in January and a maximum of 19.2 °C in July. Mean annual precipitation is 290.9 mm with 95% falling from May to October. Mean potential annual evaporation is 1316.9 mm, mean annual relative humidity is 57%, and mean annual wind velocity is 4.1 m s-1 (Lu et al., 2006). The study site is a winter-grazed range, dominated by alpine meadow species: Kobresia capillifolia, Kobresia pygmaea, Carex moorcroftii, with mean plant height of 5–10 cm. Plant roots are mainly at 0–20 cm soil depth with an average soil organic C of 1.5%. Soil development is weak and belongs to the alpine meadow soil (soil taxonomy in China, and cryosols in World Reference Base taxonomy) with a mattic epipedon at approximately 0–10 cm depth and organic-rich layer at the depth of 20–30 cm (Wang et al., 2007). The parent soil material is of fluvial-glacial origin and sand (>0.05 mm) contents reach to 95%. Permafrost thickness near the experimental site is 60–200 m and the active layer is 2.0–3.2 m (Pang et al., 2009), which has been increased at the rate of 3.1 cm yr-1 from 1995 to 2000 (Wu and Liu, 2004). The experimental field was on a mountain slope with a mean inclination of 5°. Detailed information about soil properties in the 0–20 cm layer and plant features in dry and wet conditions are in Table 1. Species composition was similar but with higher coverage and plant height in wet than in dry conditions. Average elevation difference between plots in wet and dry conditions was about 1 m (Fig. 1).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND MEASUREMENT PROTOCOL

Design

We used a split-plot experimental design with soil moisture condition as the main factor and warming as the secondary factor in this study. Four pairs of control (unwarmed) and warmed plots were in a dry site and five of them were in a wet site (Fig. 1, part C). In each warmed plot, one 165 cm × 15 cm infrared heater (MR-2420, Kalglo Electronics, Utah, U.S.A.) was suspended in the middle of the plot at a height of 1.5 m above the ground with a radiation output of 150 W m-2. The heating was operated year-round since 1 July 2010.To simulate the shading effect of heaters, one “dummy” heater made of metal sheet with the same shape and size as the heater was also installed in the control plot. For each of the paired plots, distance between the control and the warmed plots was at least 4 m to avoid the heating of the control plot by the infrared heater. The distance between the paired plots varied from 20 to 50 m (Fig. 1).

MEASUREMENT PROTOCOL

A polyvinyl chloride (PVC) collar (80 cm2 in area and 5 cm in depth) was permanently inserted 2–3 cm into soil at the center of each plot for measuring Rs. Small living plants were removed at the soil surface at least one day before the Rs measurement to eliminate the effect of above-ground biomass respiration (Zhou et al., 2007). A deep PVC tube (80 cm2 in area and 50 cm in depth) was inserted into the soil in each plot near the shallow collar in July 2010 for measuring Rh. The deep PVC tube cuts off old plant roots and prevents new roots from growing inside the tube. Carbon dioxide efflux measured above deep tubes was used to represent Rh after three months of deep collar insertion. The Ra value was calculated as the difference between Rs and Rh, which was measured once or twice a month between 10:00 and 15:00 hours (local time), using a Li-COR 6400 portable photosynthesis system attached to a soil CO2 flux chamber (Li-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.A.).

Soil temperature was monitored by thermo-probes (Model 109, Campbell Scientific, Utah, U.S.A.) installed at 5.0 cm depth in the center of each plot. Volumetric SWC (v v%-1) was measured based on frequency domain reflectometry (FDR; Sentek Pty, Stepney, Australia) at 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, 40–60, and 60–100 cm depths in each plot. The daily average data of soil temperature and moisture were recorded in a CR 1000 data logger (Campbell Scientific, U.S.A.).

Above-ground biomass (AGB) in each plot was obtained indirectly from a step-wised multiple linear regression (AGB = 22.76 × plant height + 308.26 × Coverage - 121.80, R2 = 0.74, P < 0.01, n = 100). In each month of the growing season, we took eight repeated measurements of plant coverage and forty measurements of plant height in each plot. The average plant coverage and height were substituted into the linear function to get the monthly AGB data of each plot. Root biomass (RB) was obtained from soil samples at 0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40, and 40–50 cm depths. The soil samples were air-dried for one week and passed through a 2-mm-diameter sieve to remove large particles. Procedure of separation of roots from soil and the separation of living roots from dead roots can be found in Yang et al., 2009a.

DATA ANALYSIS

Soil respiration and its components were fitted exponentially and linearly with soil temperature. Determinant coefficient was used to examine which model was better for deriving their temperature sensitivity (Q10). If the linear fitting performed better than did exponential model, Q10 would be obtained by multiplying the slope of linear fitting with 10.

Daily soil temperature and SWC data were used and analyzed with a two-way ANOVA analysis. The measured Rs, Rh, Ra, AGB, and RB in each replicate were averaged to get the monthly data, and the monthly data were analyzed by variance analysis of split-plot design in SPSS 16.0 when investigating the effects of warming, soil moisture condition, and their interaction on these parameters.

Fourteen measurements of Rs and Rh, and the calculated Ra were averaged. Mean Rs, Ra, and Rh were multiplied by growing season length to estimate the total C release. AGB and RB change in growing season was the sum of difference in five months between control and warming plots (May–September).

Results

MICROCLIMATE

Mean soil temperature was higher in dry (0.32 °C) than in wet sites (-0.16 °C; Fig. 2, part A) in control plots, which significantly increased by warming in both conditions (P < 0.01; Fig. 2, part A). The increasing magnitude had no difference between the dry and wet sites (1.75 and 1.76 °C in wet and dry). Soil water content was higher in wet than in dry sites in control plots (Fig. 2, part B), which significantly decreased by 0.89% and 2.0% in 0–10 cm but increased by 2.62% and 2.99% (v v%-1) in 60–100 cm layer in wet and dry conditions (Fig. 2, part B), respectively.

FIGURE 1.

(A) Location, (B) warming equipment installation, and (C)plots distribution of the experimental site.

f01_359.jpg

TABLE 1

Soil pH, CaCO3 (g kg-2), soil organic carbon (SOC, g kg-2), total nitrogen (TN, g kg-2), inorganic nitrogen (IN, mg kg-2), and bulk density (BD, g cm-3) in the 0–20 cm, and plant coverage (Cov., %) and height (H, cm) in the dry and wet conditions

t01_359.gif

RELATIONSHIP OF SOIL RESPIRATION AND ITS COMPONENTS WITH ABIOTIC FACTORS

Soil temperature was positively correlated with Rs and its components in wet conditions, whereas it only correlated with Rs and Rh in dry conditions (Fig. 3, parts A, C, and E). Q10 of Rs was higher in wet than in dry conditions (4.67 vs. 3.55), but that of Rh was higher in dry than in wet conditions (2.87 vs. 3.44). No obvious relationship was observed between SWC and Rs and its components in wet conditions but a positive correlation occurred between SWC and Rs and Ra in dry conditions (Fig. 3, parts B, D, and F).

RESPONSES OF SOIL RESPIRATION AND ITS COMPONENTS TO WARMING

Soil respiration and its components were higher in summer and lower in winter (Fig. 4). Soil respiration and Rh had no significant differences between the two sites (Table 2), while Ra was marginally higher in wet than in dry conditions (Table 2). Warming significantly increased Rs and Rh but had no effect on Ra (Table 2). On average Rs and Rh increased by 9.9% and 12.7% in both wet and dry conditions. The interaction between warming and SWC had a significant effect on Rs and Ra but had no effect on Rh (Fig. 5; Table 2). Both Rs and Ra decreased in dry but increased in wet condition. On average Rs and Ra decreased by 5.8% and 36.3% in dry but increased by 23.5% and 47.7% in wet. The estimated increase in soil C emission in growing season was 0.65 kg m-2 in wet condition, of which Rh increase contributed to 0.33 kg C m-2. The estimated reduction in soil C emission was 0.16 kg C m-2 in dry condition, among which Ra decrease accounted for 0.17 kg C m-2.

Contribution of Rh to Rs (Rh:Rs) was significantly different between dry and wet (Table 2). On average Rh:Rs was 76% ± 3% and 63% ± 3% in dry and wet, respectively. Interaction between warming and SWC significantly affected the Rh/Rs (Table 2). Warming increased Rh:Rs (70% ± 4% vs. 82% ± 4% in control and warming, respectively) in dry but decreased it in wet condition (67% ± 4% vs. 60% ± 4% in control and warming).

FIGURE 2.

(A) Mean soil temperature (°C, 5 cm) and (B) soil moisture (v/v%, 0–10 and 60–100 cmb) from 1 October 2010 to 18 July 2013 in dry and wet conditions. Different labels above columns represent significant difference between control and warming. (P < 0.05).

f02_359.jpg

FIGURE 3.

Relationship of soil respiration (Rs µ mol m-2 s-1) and its components (Ra and Rh) with soil temperature (°C, 5 cm) and soil moisture (v/v%, 10 cm) in wet (filled circles and solid lines) and dry conditions (open circles and dashed lines).

f03_359.jpg

RESPONSES OF ABOVE-GROUND AND ROOT BIOMASS TO WARMING

Soil water content and warming had no significant effects on AGB and RB (Table 2). However, their interaction significantly affected AGB. On average, warming increased monthly average AGB by 0.02 kg m-2 in wet but decreased it by 0.02 kg m-2 in dry conditions (Fig. 6). The cumulative AGB increase was 0.1 kg m-2 in wet and the reduction was 0.1 kg m-2 in dry condition in growing season.

The seasonal variation in Rs and its components were largely (87%, 75%, and 18%) explained by AGB (Fig. 7). Rs and Rh were more sensitive to AGB than was Ra (Fig. 7).

Discussion

RESPONSES OF RS AND ITS COMPONENTS TO WARMING

In most field experiments, warming manipulation increases Rs (Rustad et al., 2001; Wu et al., 2011), but the negative warming effect on Rs is also reported (Saleska et al., 1999). We found that warming effects on Rs depend on SWC, which was stimulated in wet but suppressed in dry condition (Fig. 5). The opposite responses of Rs in our study are consistent with results from a semi-arid steppe ecosystem (Mauritz and Lipson, 2013) and an old-field ecosystem dominated by grasses and forbs (Suseela and Dukes, 2013). In a semi-arid area, Rs and its components are inhibited when SWC is less than 10% or more than 15% (Mauritz and Lipson, 2013). The positive relationship between Rs and SWC in dry conditions (Fig. 3, part B) implies the SWC limitation on Rs in dry conditions, therefore Rs reduction is likely the result of lower SWC in dry sites (6.8% in control and decreases under warming). Nevertheless, results in our study are also different with Arctic tundra ecosystem, in which ecosystem respiration is suppressed in wet and moist but stimulated in dry tundra (Oberbauer et al., 2007). Soil water content is generally higher than the field capacity and there is even flowing surface water in the growing season in tundra ecosystem (Shaver et al., 1998). Lower water table resulting from warming would lead to saturation stress for ecosystem respiration in wet tundra (Oechel et al., 1998). Saturation stress does not exist in our study because SWC is lower than the field capacity even in the wet site and this led to the Rs increase.

FIGURE 4.

Seasonal dynamic of soil respiration (Rs) and its components (Ra and Rh) in control and warming plots in dry and wet conditions. Data are averaged from replicates, n = 14. Dates are given in the form m/dd/yyyy.

f04_359.jpg

TABLE 2

Results (F-values) of split-plot variance analysis on the effects of warming, soil moisture condition, and their interaction on soil respiration (Rs) and its components (Rh and Ra), aboveground biomass (AGB), and root biomass (RB).

t02_359.gif

FIGURE 5.

Seasonal and average (inserted panels, mean ± SE, n = 13) warming effects on (A) soil respiration (Rs), (B) heterotrophic respiration (Rh), and (C) autotrophic respiration (Ra) in wet (dark columns) and dry (white columns) conditions. Asterisks denote significance between warming and control treatments (** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05).

f05_359.jpg

Autotrophic respiration and Rh could both positively or negatively (Schindlbacher et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2007) or conversely respond to warming (Li et al., 2013). The consistent positive in wet and negative responses in dry of Ra and Rh (Fig. 5) in our study could be caused by the corresponding changes in SWC and biomass. Positive correlation between Rh and soil temperature but no obvious relationship between SWC and Rh either in dry or in wet (Fig. 3, part D) indicates that soil temperature is more important than SWC in regulating soil C decomposition in alpine meadow. Rh is affected by total detritus input or AGB (Bond-Lamberty et al., 2004), and Ra is determined by RB (Zhou et al., 2007) and temperature dependence of specific root respiration (Boone et al., 1998). Possible elevated detritus input and the associated AGB increase in wet (Fig. 6, part A) therefore would be responsible for the Rh increase because of the positive relationship between AGB and Rh (Fig. 7). The effect of AGB decrease on Rh could be compensated by the increase in RB, thus resulting in non-significant change in Rh in dry condition. Ra increase in wet is likely due to the soil temperature increase because of the positive correlation between them (Fig. 3, part E). Soil moisture deficit constrains Ra through limitation on annual productivity (Li et al., 2013), root growth (Zhou et al., 2007), and specific Ra rate (Michele and Douglas, 2009). Non-significant change in RB under warming in dry condition suggests the change in specific Ra rate. We have no direct data on the specific Ra, but the species composition change in our study site (Xu et al., 2014) might change the RB quality, thus resulting in the specific Ra change under warming.

FIGURE 6.

Warming effects on above-ground biomass (AGB) and root biomass (RB, 0–50 cm soil depth) in wet and dry conditions. Values are the average of four replicates in dry and six replicates in wet from May to September 2012. Different labels above columns indicate the significant difference at the P < 0.05 level.

f06_359.jpg

FIGURE 7.

Relationship of soil respiration (Rs µ mol m-2 s-1) and its components (Ra and Rh) with above-ground biomass (AGB) in all plots.

f07_359.jpg

The response of Ra to warmer soil can affect ecosystem C allocation and the strength of positive feedback of soil CO2 efflux to climate warming. Both Rh and Ra increased with larger relative increase in Ra in wet (53% vs. 33% in Ra and Rh), which suggests that the effect of warming-induced change in biomass on Rs is larger than direct temperature effect on Rs.

Higher Q10 of Rh in dry than in wet conditions is similar to the result in an incubation study where Q10 of Rh decreases as SWC increases (Guntiñas et al., 2013). However, higher Q10 of Rs in wet than in dry is observed in a desert shrub ecosystem (Wang et al., 2013) and in our study. The higher Q10 of Rh in dry may be due to the switch in C pool of labile substrate to recalcitrant substrates (Reichstein et al., 2002) because recalcitrant C is more sensitive to temperature change than is labile C (Knorr et al., 2005). Root always exerts a strong influence on Q10 of Rs (Boone et al., 1998; Zhou et al., 2007). The lower Q10 of Rs in dry is probably the result of lower RB biomass (Fig. 6, part B). The contrast performance of Q10 of Rs and Rh in wet and dry in our study suggests that Ra has a large effect on apparent Q10 of Rs and indicates apparent Q10 obtained in field studies without exclusion of Ra may overestimate the warming effect on soil C output.

BIOMASS RESPONSES TO WARMING

In an experimental warming study covering an elevation gradient from 4300–4600 m in alpine meadow, AGB significantly decreased at the 4300 m study site, but had no significant change in the 4600 m site (Fu et al., 2013). Optimum air temperature (Ta) for AGB is about 5.8 °C (Wang et al., 2012), and AGB increases with increasing water availability in the alpine meadow of Tibet (Yang et al., 2009b). Annual mean Ta in the present study is -3.8 °C, which is much lower than the optimum temperature. The elevated temperature is probably the reason for AGB increase in wet condition. The minimum SWC for meadow growth is found to be 11.8% (Ma et al., 2004), which is much higher than the mean SWC in dry condition. Although soil temperature significantly increased in dry condition (Fig. 2, part B), lower SWC and its decrease could result in the AGB decrease (Fig. 6, part A), which suggests that AGB is more sensitive to SWC than temperature change when SWC is lower than a threshold.

IMPLICATION FOR THE FEEDBACK OF ECOSYSTEM CARBON BALANCE TO WARMING

The growing season AGB increase in wet (0.1 kg m-2) and decrease in dry (0.1 kg m-2) is much lower than the soil C release change under warming (0.65 kg m-2 in wet and -0.16 kg m-2 in dry). The balance between AGB and Rs is 0.55 and -0.06 kg C m-2 in wet and dry conditions, respectively. The results suggest net C release in alpine meadow under warming climate when SWC maintains greater than 10%. Decrease in Rs especially in Ra could make the alpine meadow ecosystem serve as a C sink since reduction in Rs is higher than the decline in C uptake when SWC is less than 10%.

Conclusion

Soil water content determines responses of Rs and its components to warming. Ra is more sensitive to the decrease in SWC than to the increase in soil temperature when SWC is lower than 10%. AGB increase does not result in a net C gain as Rs is also largely stimulated when SWC is higher than 10% in alpine meadow. Carbon gain could happen when SWC is less than 10% as decrease in AGB under warming in dry condition would be offset by a substantial decrease in Ra and the corresponding decline in Rs. SWC difference should be considered in an ecosystem C model when investigating climatic warming effects on terrestrial ecosystem C balance.

Acknowledgments

This research is financially supported by National Science Foundation of China (grants 41301211, 41201195, 41301210), the Foundation for Excellent Youth Scholars of CAREERI, “100-talent Program” of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), and CAS (grant 351191001). The authors are greatly grateful to Professor Yongzhi Liu and all the colleagues in Beilu River research station for providing the experimental site and for their kindly help in the field experiment.

References Cited

1.

C. Biasi , H. Meyer , O. Rusalimova , R. Hämmerle , C. Kaiser , C. Baranyi , H. Daims , N. Lashchinsky , P. Barsukov , and A. Richter , 2008: Initial effects of experimental warming on carbon exchange rates, plant growth and microbial dynamics of a lichen-rich dwarf shrub tundra in Siberia. Plant and Soil , 307: 191–205. Google Scholar

2.

B. Bond-Lamberty , C. Wang , and S. Gower , 2004: A global relationship between the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of soil respiration? Global Change Biology , 10: 1756–1766. Google Scholar

3.

R. D. Boone , K. J. Nadelhoffer , J. D. Canary , and J. P. Kaye , 1998: Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration. Nature , 396: 570–572. Google Scholar

4.

P. M. Cox , R. A. Betts , C. D. Jones , S. A. Spall , and I. J. Totterdell , 2000: Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature , 408: 184–187. Google Scholar

5.

B. A. Emmett , C. Beier , M. Estiarte , A. Tietema , H. L. Kristensen , D. Williams , J. Petiuelas , I. Schmide , and A. Sowerbyl , 2004: The responses of soil processes to climate change: results from manipulaton studies of shrubland across an environmental gradient. Ecosystems , 7: 625–637. Google Scholar

6.

P. Friedlingstein , et al., 2006: Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. Journal of Climate , 19: 3337–3353. Google Scholar

7.

G. Fu , X. Z. Zhang , Y. Zhang , P. L. Shi , Y. L. Li , Y. T. Zhou , P. W. Yang , and Z. X. Shen , 2013: Experimental warming does not enhance gross primary production and above-ground biomass in the alpine meadow of Tibet. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing , 7. Google Scholar

8.

M. E. Guntiñas , F. Gil-Sotres , M. C. Leirós , and C. Trasar-Cepeda , 2013: Sensitivity of soil respiration to moisture and temperature. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition , 13: 445–461. Google Scholar

9.

P. Hanson , N. Edwards , C. Garten , and J. Andrews , 2000: Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry , 48: 115–146. Google Scholar

10.

P. Hogberg , A. Nordgren , N. Buchmann , A. F. S. Taylor , A. Ekblad , M. N. Hogberg , G. Nyberg , M. Ottosson-Lofvenius , and D. J. Read , 2001: Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration. Nature , 411: 789–792. Google Scholar

11.

J. A. Klein , J. Harte , and X. Q. Zhao , 2005: Dynamic and complex microclimate responses to warming and grazing manipulations. Global Change Biology , 11: 1440–1451. Google Scholar

12.

W. Knorr , I. C. Prentice , and E. A. Holland , 2005: Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature , 433: 298–301. Google Scholar

13.

D. Li , X. Zhou , L. Wu , J. Zhou , and Y. Luo , 2013: Contrasting responses of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration to experimental warming in a winter annual-dominated prairie. Global Change Biology , 19: 3553–3564. Google Scholar

14.

X. W. Lin , Z. Zhang , S. Wang , Y. Hu , G. Xu , C. Luo , X. Chang , J. Duan , Q. Lin , B. Xu , Y. Wang , X. Zhao , and Z. Xi , 2011: Response of ecosystem respiration to warming and grazing during the growing seasons in the alpine meadow on the Tibetan plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology , 151: 792–802. Google Scholar

15.

Z. Lu , Q. Wu , S. Yu , and L. Zhang , 2006: Heat and water difference of active layers beneath different surface conditions near Beiluhe in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology , 28: 642–647. Google Scholar

16.

Y. Q. Luo , R. Sherry , X. H. Zhou , and S. Q. Wan , 2009: Terrestrial carbon-cycle feedback to climate warming: experimental evidence on plant regulation and impacts of biofuel feedstock harvest. GCB-Bioenergy , 1: 62–74. Google Scholar

17.

K. M. Ma , B. J. Fu , S. L. Liu , W. G. Guan , G. H. Liu , Y. H. Lv , and M. Anand , 2004: Multiple scale soil moisture distribution and its implications for ecosystem respiration in an arid river valley, China. Land Degradation & Development , 15: 75–85. Google Scholar

18.

M. Mauritz , and D. L. Lipson , 2013: Altered phenology and temperature sensitivity of invasive annual grasses and forbs changes autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration rates in a semi-arid shrub community. Biogeosciences Discussions , 10: 6335–6375. Google Scholar

19.

A. T. Michele , and A. F. Douglas , 2009: The effects of clipping and soil moisture on leaf and root morphology and root respiration in two temperate and two tropical grasses. Plant Ecology , 200: 205–215. Google Scholar

20.

S. F. Oberbauer , et al., 2007: Tundra CO2 fluxes in response to experimental warming across latitudinal and moisture gradients. Ecological Monographs , 77: 221–238. Google Scholar

21.

W. G. Oechel , G. L. Vourlitis , S. J. Hastings , R. P. Ault , and P. Jrbryant , 1998: The effects of water table manipulation and elevated temperature on the net CO2 flux of wet sedge tundra ecosystems. Global Change Biology , 4: 77–90. Google Scholar

22.

V. Pacific , B. McGlynn , D. Riveros-Iregui , H. Epstein , and D. Welsch , 2009: Differential soil respiration responses to changing hydrologic regimes. Water Resources Research , 45:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007721Google Scholar

23.

Q. Pang , G. Cheng , S. Li , and W. Zhang , 2009: Active layer thickness calculation over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Cold Regions Science and Technology , 57: 23–28. Google Scholar

24.

J. W. Raich , and W. H. Schlesinger , 1992: The global dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus B , 44: 81–99. Google Scholar

25.

M. Reichstein , J. D. Tenhunen , O. Roupsard , J.-m. Ourcival , S. Rambal , F. Miglietta , A. Peressotti , M. Pecchiari , G. Tirone , and R. Valentini , 2002: Severe drought effects on ecosystem CO2 and H2O fluxes at three Mediterranean evergreen sites: revision of current hypotheses? Global Change Biology , 8: 999–1017. Google Scholar

26.

L. E. Rustad , J. L. Campbell , G. M. Marion , R. J. Norby , M. J. Mitchell , A. E. Hartley , J. H. C. Cornelissen , and J. Gurevitch , 2001: A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia , 126: 543–562. Google Scholar

27.

S. Saleska , K. Harte , and M. Torn , 1999: The effect of experimental ecosystem warming on CO2 fluxes in a montane meadow. Global Change Biology , 5: 125–141. Google Scholar

28.

D. S. Schimel , B. H. Braswell , and A. B. Holland , 1994: Climatic,edaphic,and biotic controls over the storage and turnover of carbon in soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles , 8: 279–293. Google Scholar

29.

A. Schindlbacher , S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern , and R. Jandl , 2009: Carbon losses due to soil warming: do autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration respond equally? Global Change Biology , 15: 901–913. Google Scholar

30.

E. A. G. Schuur , J. G. Vogel , K. G. Crummer , H. Lee , J. O. Sickman , and T. E. Osterkamp , 2009: The effect of permafrost thaw on old carbon release and net carbon exchange from tundra. Nature , 459: 556–559. Google Scholar

31.

G. R. Shaver , L. C. Johnson , D. H. Cades , G. Murray , J. A. Laundre , E. B. Rastetter , K. J. Nadelhoffer , and A. E. Giblin , 1998: Biomass and CO2 flux in wet sedge tundras: responses to nutrients, temperature, and light. Ecological Monographs , 68: 75–97. Google Scholar

32.

R. Shaver , J. Canadell , F. S. Chapin III, J. Gurevitch , J. Harte , G. Henry , P. Ineson , S. Jonasson , J. Melillo , L. Pitelka , and L. Rustad , 2000: Global warming and terrestrial ecosystems: a conceptual framework for analysis. BioScience , 50: 871–882. Google Scholar

33.

V. Suseela , and J. Dukes , 2013: The responses of soil and rhizosphere respiration to simulated climatic changes vary by season. Ecology , 94: 403–413. Google Scholar

34.

Z. Tao , C. D. Shen , Q. Z. Gao , Y. M. Sun , W. X. Yi , and Y. N. Li , 2007: Soil organic carbon storage and soil CO2 flux in the alpine meadow ecosystem. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences , 50: 1103–1114. Google Scholar

35.

S. Trumbore , 2000: Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecological Applications , 10: 399–411. Google Scholar

36.

B. Wang , T. S. Zha , X. Jia , B. Wu , Y. Q. Zhang , and S. G. Qin , 2013: Soil moisture modifies the response of soil respiration to temperature in a desert shrub ecosystem. Biogeosciences Discussion , 10: 9213–9242. Google Scholar

37.

G. Wang , Y. Wang , Y. Li , and H. Cheng , 2007: Influences of alpine ecosystem responses to climatic change on soil properties on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. CATENA , 70: 506–514. Google Scholar

38.

G. Wang , Y. Li , Y. Wang , and Q. Wu , 2008: Effects of permafrost thawing on vegetation and soil carbon losses on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Geoderma , 143: 143–152. Google Scholar

39.

Z. Wang , T. Luo , R. Li , Y. Tang , and M. Du , 2012: Causes for the unimodal pattern of biomass and productivity in alpine grasslands along a large altitudinal gradient in semi-arid regions. Journal of Vegetation Science , 24: 189–201. Google Scholar

40.

Q. B. Wu , and Y. Z. Liu , 2004: Ground temperature monitoring and its recent change in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Cold Regions Science and Technology , 38: 85–92. Google Scholar

41.

Z. T. Wu , P. Dijkstra , G. W. Koch , J. Peñuelas , and B. A. Hungate , 2011: Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change: a meta-analysis of experimental manipulation. Global Change Biology , 17: 927–942. Google Scholar

42.

M. H. Xu , F. Peng , Q. G. You , J. Guo , X. F. Tian , X. Xue , and M. Liu , 2015: Year-round warming and autumnal clipping lead to downward transport of root biomass, carbon and total nitrogen in soil of an alpine meadow. Environmental and Experimental Botany , 109: 54–62. Google Scholar

43.

Y. Yang , J. Fang , C. Ji , and W. Han , 2009a: Above- and belowground biomass allocation in Tibetan grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science , 20: 177–184. Google Scholar

44.

Y. H. Yang , J. Y. Fang , Y. D. Pan , and C. J. Ji , 2009b: Aboveground biomass in Tibetan grasslands. Journal of Arid Environments , 73: 91–95. Google Scholar

45.

X. Zhou , Y. Luo , C. Gao , P. S. J. Verburg , J. A. Arnone , A. Darrouzet-Nardi , and D. S. Schimel , 2010: Concurrent and lagged impacts of an anomalously warm year on autotrophic and heterotrophic components of soil respiration: a deconvolution analysis. New Phytologist , 187: 184–198. Google Scholar

46.

X. H. Zhou , S. Q. Wan , and Y. Q. Luo , 2007: Source components and interannual variability of soil CO2 efflux under experimental warming and clipping in a grassland ecosystem. Global Change Biology , 13: 761–775. Google Scholar
Peng Fei, Xu Manhou, You Quangang, Zhou Xuhui, Wang Tao, and Xue Xian "Different Responses of Soil Respiration and Its Components to Experimental Warming with Contrasting Soil Water Content," Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 47(2), 359-368, (1 May 2015). https://doi.org/10.1657/AAAR0014-018
Accepted: 1 December 2014; Published: 1 May 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top