Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2003 Establishment of Persistent Avian Infectious Bronchitis Virus Infection in Antibody-Free and Antibody-Positive Chickens
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) causes a highly contagious and economically significant disease in chickens. Establishment of a carrier state in IBV infection and the potential for the persistent virus to undergo mutations and recombination in chicken tissues have important consequences for disease management. Nevertheless, whether chickens can maintain persistent IBV infection in the absence of reinfection from exogenous sources or the presence of antibody in the host can modulate virus persistence remains unclear. Indeed, whether or not IBV genome can undergo genetic changes during in vivo infection has not been demonstrated experimentally.

In the present study, IBV shedding and tissue persistence were monitored in individual chickens maintained under strict isolation that precluded reinfection from exogenous sources. In the first of two experiments, intranasal exposure of 6-wk-old antibody-free chickens to IBV vaccine virus resulted in intermittent shedding of the virus from both trachea and cloaca of individual birds for up to 63 days. Also, the virus was recovered from the internal organs (spleen, gonad, kidney, lung, cecal tonsil, and cloacal bursa) of six of eight birds killed at various intervals between 27 and 163 days postinoculation (DPI). In the second experiment, IBV exposure of 1-day-old maternal antibody–positive chicks led to periodic virus shedding from the trachea and cloaca in all chickens until 77 days; however, internal organs (lungs and kidneys) of only one of seven birds (killed at 175 DPI) were virus positive, suggesting that presence of antibody at the time of infection protects internal organs from IBV infection. When the lung and kidney isolates of IBV from the latter experiment were compared with the parent-vaccine virus, no changes in their antigenicity, tissue tropism, or the nucleotide sequence of the S1 glycoprotein gene were observed. These findings indicate that, unlike the mammalian coronaviruses, propensity for frequent genetic change may not be inherent in the IBV genome.

Infectious bronchitis is a highly contagious disease of chickens that inflicts major economic losses. The etiologic agent, infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), is a coronavirus, which is worldwide in distribution. IBV has a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome that is 27.6 kb long and encodes three major structural proteins. These proteins include the spike (S) glycoprotein (S protein), which consists of an outer N-terminal-half S1 and a membrane-anchoring C-terminal S2 portion, membrane glycoprotein, and the nucleocapsid (N) protein (6,26). In addition, a small membrane protein is also associated with the virion envelope (27). Of these proteins, the S1 is biologically the most important because it mediates virus infectivity and membrane fusion (3) and carries serotype-specific antigenic determinants that induce virus-neutralizing antibodies (5).

The two properties of the mammalian coronaviruses that have been the focus of great interest and investigation are 1) the ability to establish persistent infection of host tissues and 2) the propensity to undergo genetic change during in vivo and in vitro replication (1,9,24). However, in the case of avian coronaviruses, neither of these properties has been demonstrated compellingly. For example, IBV outbreaks in vaccinated chickens often have been linked to antigenic and pathogenic variants of the virus, yet, whether IBV vaccine viruses establish persistent infection or contribute to variant virus populations in the field has not been established convincingly. IBV-infected birds have been shown to intermittently excrete the virus (15). Early studies in experimentally infected chickens led to the conclusion that IBV persistence in chickens is through continual reinfection from exogenous sources and not through establishment of a carrier state in individual birds (7). A number of subsequent studies, all conducted in group-housed and not individually isolated chickens, failed to clarify the question of whether persistence or reinfection leads to sustained IBV excretion (2,8,11,16). However, a study in which chickens inoculated with IBV at 1 day of age stopped shedding virus after about 7 wk postinoculation and resumed virus excretion at sexual maturity strongly suggested existence of persistent or chronic IBV infection (15). Although it is evident that IBV persistence and excretion have enormous implications for the control of this infection, the understanding of these phenomena is incomplete at best.

The present study, the first to be conducted in individually isolated birds, was aimed at addressing three fundamental questions: 1) can IBV vaccine viruses establish persistent infection, b) does the immune status of the host at the time of infection have a modulating effect on virus persistence, and 3) can the postulated genetic alteration of IBV during persistent infection be experimentally demonstrated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chickens and housing

White leghorn-type chickens were used in both experiments (Expts. 1 and 2). The 6-wk-old antibody-negative chickens used in Expt. 1 were derived from our departmental breeder flocks, whereas the 1-day-old maternal antibody–positive chickens were obtained from a commercial hatchery. Chickens were individually housed in P3-level isolators during the entire study. The inside of each isolator was cleaned periodically (without breaking the integrity of the unit) with dilute Clorox solution to inactivate any IBV that might be excreted by the bird and could cause reinfection.

Virus

A Massachusetts-serotype vaccine virus was used in both experiments. The virus was titrated in chicken embryos (23), and one drop of virus inoculum containing approximately 105 mean embryo infective dose (EID50) was administered to individual birds through the ocular route.

Expt. 1

Nine 6-wk-old chickens were individually housed in separate isolator units. Eight were inoculated with IBV as described above, and one bird was maintained as an uninoculated control. An additional bird was placed in a cage within the room in which the isolators were located in order to monitor the environment for the presence of IBV. Cloacal and tracheal swabs were collected for virus isolation from each inoculated bird every 3–4 days for the first 27 days and subsequently at weekly intervals until 163 days postinoculation (DPI). On days 27, 48, 70, 91, 112, 126, 154, and 163, a bird was removed from the isolator, bled, and euthanatized for collection of tissues including brain, spleen, gonad, kidney, trachea, lung, cecal tonsil, and cloacal bursa. Tissues from the two uninoculated control chickens, one housed in the isolator and the other in the cage, were collected at 91 days and 134 days, respectively, from the start of the experiment. All collected tissues were used for virus isolation.

Expt. 2

Fifty 1-day-old chicks were wing-banded for identification, and 200–400 μl of blood was obtained from the jugular vein of each. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed on individual serum samples to assess levels of maternal antibody to IBV (17). Eight birds with matching antibody levels were individually inoculated with IBV and placed in individual isolators as described for Expt. 1. One bird that died of nonspecific causes 48 hr after the start of the experiment was not replaced. Tracheal and cloacal swabs were collected from the remaining seven birds for virus isolation at weekly intervals starting at 3 wk until 25 weeks postinoculation. At 98, 140, 147, 154, 161, 168, and 175 DPI, birds were removed from the isolator, bled, and killed for tissue collection and virus isolation, as described for Expt. 1.

Virus isolation

Standard procedures were used for sample preparation and IBV isolation in embryonating chicken eggs (10). At least two 9-to-11-day-old chicken embryos were inoculated per sample via the allantoic sac route. After 40 hr of incubation, embryos were chilled overnight at 4 C, and allantoic fluid was harvested for further embryo passage. Allantoic fluids from the second and third embryo passages were centrifuged (1000 × g for 15 min), and the cell pellets were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4. Presence of IBV in the allantoic cells and allantoic fluids was investigated by immunohistochemistry with IBV-specific monoclonal antibody (21) and antigen-capture ELISA (22), respectively.

Determination of S1 sequence

S1 gene sequence was determined by a procedure described previously (18,19). Briefly, IBV genomic RNA was extracted from 250 μl of infected allantoic fluid with TRIzol LS reagent (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY) and resuspended in 3 μl of RNAse-free water. Amplification of the S1 gene was performed by reverse transcription (RT)–polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the primers NewS1oligo5′ (5′TGAAACTGAACAAAAGAC3′) and Degenerate3′ (5′CCATAAGTAACATAAGGRCRA3′) (12,19). The RT-PCR was performed with the GeneAmp RNA PCR kit (Perkin Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, CT). cDNA was synthesized from 3 μl of RNA with random hexamer primer at 42 C for 30 min, and the mixture was then heated for 5 min at 94 C to stop the reaction. Both the RT reaction and PCR were conducted in an MJ Research thermal cycler (PTC-100; MJ Research, Inc., Watertown, MA). For the PCR reaction, 2 μl (15 μM) of each primer, NewS1oligo5′ and Degenerate3′, was added in a 100-μl reaction volume. The first cycle of PCR amplification was carried out for 90 sec at 94 C, 30 sec at 50 C, and 2 min at 72 C. The remaining 34 cycles were carried out for 30 sec at 94 C, 30 sec at 50 C, and 2 min at 72 C with a final elongation step of 15 min at 72 C. PCR products were visualized by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel, followed by staining with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/ml).

We performed direct sequencing of the PCR products (18). We used a combination of flanking and internal primers to sequence both strands of cDNA in their entirety. Assembly of sequencing contigs, translation into amino acid sequence, and initial multiple-sequence alignment were performed with the BioEdit software version 5.0 (North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC).

Challenge of immunity and tissue tropism studies

We examined two persistent IBV isolates recovered at 175 DPI from lung and kidney tissues, respectively, to determine whether their antigenicity and tissue tropism had changed compared with their parent-vaccine virus. Forty-seven specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens were vaccinated twice, first at 1 day of age and then at 14 days with the same vaccine virus used in the study. A group of 25 SPF chickens of the same age was maintained as unvaccinated controls in a separate isolation room. At 21 days of age (i.e., 7 days post second vaccination), vaccinated and unvaccinated chickens were separated into three groups each and housed in separate rooms. The three vaccinated groups with 19, 19, and 9 chickens, respectively, were intranasally inoculated with the persistent lung isolate, the persistent kidney isolate, and homologous vaccine virus, respectively; each bird received 1000 EID50 of the respective virus. The three groups of unvaccinated chickens, consisting of 10, 10, and 5 birds, were similarly inoculated with the three viruses as described for the vaccinated groups. Five days after the virus inoculation, all birds were euthanatized and tracheas were collected from each for virus isolation by chicken embryo inoculation as described above.

To study tissue tropism, we inoculated the lung and the kidney isolates and the vaccine virus into separate groups of 27, 26, and 24 1-day-old chickens, respectively. During the subsequent 21 days, chickens were observed for signs of clinical disease including anorexia, respiratory signs (open-mouth breathing and sneezing), and mortality. At 21 DPI, all birds were euthanatized, and lung and kidney tissues from individuals were collected for virus isolation in chicken embryos.

RESULTS

The virus excretion pattern observed in Expt. 1 is presented in Table 1. All inoculated chickens excreted IBV from the trachea and/or cloaca during the first 6–10 DPI. Subsequently, birds 1, 5, 6, and 8 did not excrete IBV for the rest of the experiment, whereas birds 2, 3, 4, and 7 resumed virus shedding after 17, 34, 41, and 48 days, respectively. In the latter group, whereas chickens 2, 4, and 7 excreted IBV once or twice, bird 3 excreted the virus over a 29-day period.

When we examined the internal organs of the chickens in Expt. 1, six of the eight chickens killed between 27 and 163 DPI were IBV positive (Table 2). Among the organs from which IBV was isolated at various intervals were cloacal bursa, cecal tonsil, spleen, gonad, kidney, and lung.

The tracheal and cloacal swabs, as well as the internal organs of the two uninoculated control chickens (maintained to monitor possible escape of the virus into the environment), were free of IBV (data not shown).

In Expt. 2, IBV shedding was monitored from 21 DPI until 175 DPI (Table 3). Between 21 and 35 DPI, most chickens excreted the virus from either trachea or cloaca, although tracheal excretion was more common. Intermittent virus shedding was observed from birds 2, 4, 6, and 7, with bird 4 shedding IBV until 70 DPI and bird 7 until 77 DPI. Tracheal and cloacal swabs collected between 84 and 175 DPI were negative for IBV. Individual birds in Expt. 2 were killed for virus isolation between 98 and 175 DPI. Of the seven birds examined in this period, only one (bird 7), killed at 175 DPI, carried IBV in two internal organs, lung and kidney (Table 4).

A comparison of the S1 gene sequences revealed a 100% match between the two persistent lung and kidney isolates and their parent-vaccine virus (data not shown).

In the antigenic comparison studies, none of the vaccinated chickens intranasally challenged with the lung isolate and only one of the 19 birds challenged with the kidney isolate yielded IBV from their tracheas 5 days after challenge, showing close antigenic homology between vaccine virus and the two persistent viruses (Table 5). On the other hand, the two groups of 10 nonvaccinated chickens that were respectively inoculated with the two persistent IBV isolates were all positive for IBV.

Table 6 summarizes the results of pathogenicity and tissue tropism studies. The chickens in the three groups, inoculated with the lung isolate, kidney isolate, and vaccine virus, respectively, suffered no mortality and no apparent respiratory disease or other signs of illness such as dullness, huddling near the heat source, and reduced feed intake. When virus isolation was attempted from the lung and kidney tissues at 21 DPI, 10 of 27 chickens inoculated with the lung isolate and 11 of 26 inoculated with the kidney isolate yielded IBV from the lung tissues. None of the kidney samples from those chickens was virus positive. On the other hand, of the 24 chickens that received the vaccine virus, 12 yielded the virus from lungs and three from the kidneys.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we examined IBV shedding from the trachea and cloaca and IBV persistence in internal organs of chickens that were antibody free or carried maternally derived antibody at the time of virus inoculation. To our knowledge, it is the first study in which IBV persistence has been monitored in individual birds kept under strict isolation that eliminated reinfection from exogenous sources. Also, it is the first report that addresses the possible modulating role of circulating antibody on virus persistence. In this study, although we focused primarily on virus isolation in embryonating chicken eggs as the method for detecting IBV persistence in tissues, we screened limited numbers of virus-negative tissues for the presence of viral RNA by RT-PCR with universal S1 and N gene primers (12,19,25) (data not shown). Those tissues that were IBV negative by the embryo inoculation method were also negative for viral RNA by RT-PCR.

We studied the persistence of a vaccine virus in this study because of two considerations: first, because the vaccine virus is egg-adapted, we believed it would be readily detected by embryo inoculation and, second, because of the vaccine virus's postulated role in establishing persistent infection and giving rise to variants in the field, we believed that the data would have applied significance.

The virus excretion data in Tables 1 and 3 show that IBV antibody-free and antibody-positive chickens shed the virus for up to 63 and 77 days, respectively, after the initial exposure. It is interesting to note that virus excretion was not continuous, and some of the birds re-excreted virus after a pause in shedding of up to 42 days. Although an earlier report indicated that persistently infected chickens might resume IBV shedding on reaching sexual maturity (15), we did not observe this in the present study.

When antibody-free chickens were exposed to IBV, the virus was isolated from the internal organs of six of eight chickens killed between 27 and 154 days after the initial exposure. Also, the longest period between virus shedding and virus isolation from the internal organs was 157 days. Interestingly, the virus was widely distributed in the internal organs of these birds, including cloacal bursa, cecal tonsil, spleen, gonad, kidney, and lung (Table 2). In antibody-positive birds, although the virus shedding was similar to that observed in antibody-free chickens (Table 3), the virus was found in the internal organs of only one of seven birds (Table 4). These observations suggest that presence of circulating antibody in the latter group at the time of virus inoculation might have blocked the virus from reaching the internal organs. On the other hand, because antibody in circulation is unlikely to influence virus infection in the respiratory and digestive tracts, we assume that the infection there remained unaffected by the systemic antibody.

Characterization of the two persistent tissue isolates of IBV from Expt. 2 revealed no change in their S1 gene sequence, antigenicity, pathogenicity, or tissue tropism when compared with the parent-vaccine virus (Tables 5, 6). This finding is quite in contrast to the mammalian coronaviruses that have been shown to undergo frequent genetic change during in vivo persistence (1). Indeed, a number of variants of murine hepatitis virus with deletions in the S glycoprotein gene have been isolated from persistently infected mice (24). In one study, 11 of 20 persistently infected mice harbored spike-deletion variants, indicating that deletions are common during persistent infection (24). Interestingly, in the latter study, mice with the most severe and persistent neurologic disease harbored the most prevalent and diverse quasispecies of spike-deletion mutants.

In the present study, we did examine tissues by RT-PCR for the presence of S1 and N gene-associated RNA in those cases where no IBV could be isolated from tissues by the embryo inoculation method. Those attempts failed to demonstrate presence of IBV or the respective RNA species (data not shown). Although the present study is limited by the fact that only two persistent viruses were examined in detail, it provides evidence that persistence in the case of IBV is not necessarily associated with a change in virus genetic and antigenic properties. It is also interesting to note that in a recent study in our laboratory, Mass isolates from the 1940s differed only marginally (2% in the S1 gene sequence) from Mass serotype strain M41, a laboratory strain of IBV that has undergone countless passages in chickens and chicken embryos (14). These and similar observations reported by others (4) indicate that genetic change that is a hallmark of mammalian coronaviruses may not be a constant feature of all IBV strains. Nevertheless, it can be argued that, despite the possible low rate of mutation in the IBV RNA, viral persistence may still be a significant factor in the emergence of variant viruses because a percentage of the billions of chickens that are vaccinated each year with IBV is likely to harbor the virus for long periods, which is certain to increase the probability of development of variant viruses through both mutation and recombination (13,20,28).

Acknowledgments

We express appreciation to Ms. Beverley Bauman, Ms. Brigitte Arduini, and Mr. Mozammal Hossain for their excellent technical assistance.

REFERENCES

1.

C. Adami, J. Pooley, J. Glomb, E. Stecker, F. Fazel, J. O. Fleming, and S. C. Baker . Evolution of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) during chronic infection: quasispecies nature of the persisting MHV RNA. Virology 209:337–346.1995.  Google Scholar

2.

D. J. Alexander and R. E. Gough . Isolation of avian infectious bronchitis virus from experimentally infected chickens. Res. Vet. Sci 23:344–347.1977.  Google Scholar

3.

D. Cavanagh and P. J. Davis . Coronavirus IBV: removal of spike glycopolypeptide S1 by urea abolishes infectivity and haemagglutination but not attachment to cells. J. Gen. Virol 67:1443–1448.1986.  Google Scholar

4.

D. Cavanagh, P. J. Davis, J. K A. Cook, D. Li, A. Kant, and G. Koch . Location of the amino acid differences in the S1 spike glycoprotein subunit of closely related serotypes of infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Pathol 21:33–43.1992.  Google Scholar

5.

D. Cavanagh, P. J. Davis, and A. P A. Mockett . Amino acid within hypervariable region 1 of avian coronavirus IBV (Massachusetts serotype) spike glycoproteins are associated with neutralization epitopes. Virus Res 11:141–150.1988.  Google Scholar

6.

D. Cavanagh and S. Naqi . Infectious bronchitis. In: Diseases of poultry, 10th ed. B. W. Calnek, H. J. Barnes, C. W. Beard, L. R. McDougald, and Y. M. Saif, eds. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. pp. 511–526. 1997. Google Scholar

7.

J. K A. Cook Duration of experimental infectious bronchitis in chickens. Res. Vet. Sci 9:506–514.1968.  Google Scholar

8.

M. D. El-Houadfi, R. C. Jones, J. K A. Cook, and A. G. Ambali . The isolation and characterization of six avian infectious bronchitis viruses isolated in Morocco. Avian Pathol 15:93–105.1986.  Google Scholar

9.

J. O. Fleming, J. J. Houtman, H. Alaca, H. C. Hinze, D. McKenzie, J. Aiken, T. Bleasdale, and S. Baker . Persistence of viral RNA in the central nervous system of mice inoculated with MHV-4. In: Coronaviruses. H. Laude and J. F. Vautherot, eds. Plenum Press, New York. pp. 327–332. 1994. Google Scholar

10.

J. Gelb Jr. and M. W. Jackwood . Infectious bronchitis. In: A laboratory manual for the isolation and identification of avian pathogens, 4th ed. D. E. Swayne, J. R. Glisson, M. W. Jackwood, J. E. Pearson, and W. M. Reed, eds. American Association of Avian Pathologists, Kennett Square, PA. pp. 169–174. 1998. Google Scholar

11.

R. A. Hawkes, J. H. Darbyshire, R. W. Peters, A. P A. Mockett, and D. Cavanagh . Presence of viral antigens and antibody in trachea of chickens infected with avian infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Pathol 12:331–340.1983.  Google Scholar

12.

M. W. Jackwood, N. M H. Yousef, and D. A. Hilt . Further development and use of a molecular serotype identification test for infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Dis 41:105–110.1997.  Google Scholar

13.

W. Jia, K. Karaca, C. R. Parrish, and S. A. Naqi . A novel variant of avian infectious bronchitis virus resulting from recombination among three different strains. Arch. Virol 140:259–271.1995.  Google Scholar

14.

W. Jia, S. P. Mondal, and S. A. Naqi . Genetic and antigenic diversity in avian infectious bronchitis virus isolates of the 1940s. Avian Dis 46:437–441.2002.  Google Scholar

15.

R. C. Jones and A. G. Ambali . Re-excretion of an enterotropic infectious bronchitis virus by hens at point of lay after experimental infection at day old. Vet. Rec 120:617–620.1987.  Google Scholar

16.

R. C. Jones and F. T W. Jordan . Persistence of virus in the tissues and development of the oviduct in the fowl following infection at day old with infectious bronchitis virus. Res. Vet. Sci 13:52–60.1972.  Google Scholar

17.

K. Karaca, S. A. Naqi, P. Palukatis, and B. Lucio . Serological and molecular characterization of three enteric isolates of infectious bronchitis virus of chickens. Avian Dis 34:899–904.1990.  Google Scholar

18.

B. E. Kingham, C. L. Keeler Jr., W. A. Nix, B. S. Ladman, and J. Gelb Jr. . Identification of avian infectious bronchitis virus by direct automated cycle sequencing of the S-1 gene. Avian Dis 44:325–335.2000.  Google Scholar

19.

C. Lee, D. A. Hilt, and M. W. Jackwood . Redesign of primer and application of the reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism test to the DE072 strain of infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Dis 44:650–654.2000.  Google Scholar

20.

C. W. Lee and M. W. Jackwood . Evidence of genetic diversity generated by recombination among avian coronavirus IBV. Arch. Virol 145:2135–2148.2000.  Google Scholar

21.

S. A. Naqi A monoclonal antibody–based immunoperoxidase procedure for rapid detection of infectious bronchitis virus in infected tissues. Avian Dis 34:893–898.1990.  Google Scholar

22.

S. A. Naqi, K. Karaca, and B. Bauman . A monoclonal antibody–based antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for identification of infectious bronchitis virus serotypes. Avian Pathol 22:555–564.1993.  Google Scholar

23.

L. J. Reed and H. Muench . A simple method for estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg 27:493–497.1938.  Google Scholar

24.

C. L. Rowe, S. C. Baker, M. J. Nathan, and J. O. Fleming . Evolution of mouse hepatitis virus: detection and characterization of spike deletion varients during persistent infection. J. Virol 71:2959–2969.1997.  Google Scholar

25.

S. H. Seo, L. Wang, R. Smith, and E. W. Collisson . The carboxyl-terminal 120-residue polypeptide of infectious bronchitis virus nucleocapsid induces cytotoxic T lymphocytes and protects chickens from acute infection. J. Virol 71:7889–7894.1997.  Google Scholar

26.

D. F. Stern and B. M. Sefton . Coronavirus proteins: biogenesis of avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus. J. Virol 44:794–803.1982.  Google Scholar

27.

D. F. Stern and B. M. Sefton . Coronavirus multiplication: locations of genes for virion proteins on the avian infectious bronchitis virus genome. J. Virol 50:22–29.1984.  Google Scholar

28.

L. Wang, Y. Yu, and E. W. Collisson . Experimantal confirmation of recombination upstream of the S1 hypervariable region of infectious bronchitis virus. Virus Res 49:139–145.1997.  Google Scholar

Appendices

i0005-2086-47-3-594-t01.gif

i0005-2086-47-3-594-t02.gif

i0005-2086-47-3-594-t03.gif

i0005-2086-47-3-594-t04.gif

i0005-2086-47-3-594-t05.gif

i0005-2086-47-3-594-t06.gif

Syed Naqi, Kathryn Gay, Prasad Patalla, Shankar Mondal, and Runzhong Liu "Establishment of Persistent Avian Infectious Bronchitis Virus Infection in Antibody-Free and Antibody-Positive Chickens," Avian Diseases 47(3), 594-601, (1 July 2003). https://doi.org/10.1637/6087
Received: 4 November 2002; Published: 1 July 2003
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top