Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2003 Effects of Pulsatile Shear Stress on Nitric Oxide Production and Endothelial Cell Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression by Ovine Fetoplacental Artery Endothelial Cells
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Placental blood flow, endothelial nitric oxide (NO) production, and endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression increase during pregnancy. Shear stress, the frictional force exerted on endothelial cells by blood flow, stimulates vessel dilation, endothelial NO production, and eNOS expression. In order to study the effects of pulsatile flow/shear stress, we adapted Cellco CELLMAX artificial capillary modules to study ovine fetoplacental artery endothelial (OFPAE) cells for NO production and eNOS expression. OFPAE cells were grown in the artificial capillary modules at 3 dynes/cm2. Confluent cells were then exposed to 10, 15, or 25 dynes/cm2 for up to 24 h. NO production by OFPAE cells exposed to pulsatile shear stress was inhibited to nondetectable levels by the NOS inhibitor l-NMMA and reversed by excess NOS substrate l-arginine. NO production and expression of eNOS mRNA and protein by OFPAE cells were elevated by shear stress in a graded fashion (P < 0.05). The rise in NO production with 25 dynes/cm2 shear stress (8-fold) was greater (P < 0.05) than that observed for eNOS protein (3.6-fold) or eNOS mRNA (1.5-fold). The acute shear stress-induced rise in NO production by OFPAE cells was via eNOS activation, whereas the prolonged NO rise occurred by elevations in both eNOS expression and enzyme activation. Thus, elevations of placental blood flow and physiologic shear stress may be partly responsible for the increases in placental arterial endothelial eNOS expression and NO production during pregnancy.

Yun Li, Jing Zheng, Ian M. Bird, and Ronald R. Magness "Effects of Pulsatile Shear Stress on Nitric Oxide Production and Endothelial Cell Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression by Ovine Fetoplacental Artery Endothelial Cells," Biology of Reproduction 69(3), 1053-1059, (1 September 2003). https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.013474
Received: 18 November 2002; Accepted: 1 May 2003; Published: 1 September 2003
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top