Translator Disclaimer
4 November 2009 Analysis of Recombinant Human Semenogelin as an Inhibitor of Human Sperm Motility
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Eppin (epididymal protease inhibitor [SPINLW1]) is present in a protein complex on the human sperm surface that contains lactotransferrin, clusterin, and semenogelin (SEMG1). During ejaculation the presence of semenogelin inhibits sperm progressive motility until semenogelin is hydrolyzed by prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Although eppin binds all three components in its protein complex, the binding of semenogelin to eppin appears to be critical for the inhibition of progressive motility. The effect of the originally identified seminal plasma motility inhibitor fragment has not been clearly defined on live spermatozoa. Therefore, we have used recombinant semenogelin (rSEMG1) and its fragments, including a semenogelin mutant in which cysteine 239 was changed to glycine, coupled with a computer assisted sperm analysis assay to study the motility inhibitory properties of semenogelin. Each fragment and the mutant were tested for their effects on motility. Recombinant semenogelin significantly inhibited sperm progressive motility in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The C-terminal semenogelin fragment (amino acids 164–283) containing cysteine 239 significantly inhibited sperm progressive motility, whereas the N-terminal fragment (amino acids 24–163), a short C-terminal fragment (amino acids 172–215) without cysteine 239, and the mutant fragment (amino acids 24–283 with glycine 239) did not inhibit motility. After treatment with recombinant semenogelin, spermatozoa could be washed and treated with PSA, partially reversing the inhibition of progressive motility. Cysteine 239 of rSEMG1 appears to be the critical amino acid for both binding to eppin and inhibiting sperm motility.

Anurag Mitra, Richard T. Richardson, and Michael G. O'Rand "Analysis of Recombinant Human Semenogelin as an Inhibitor of Human Sperm Motility," Biology of Reproduction 82(3), 489-496, (4 November 2009). https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.081331
Received: 8 September 2009; Accepted: 1 October 2009; Published: 4 November 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top