We critically review the main approaches for standardizing and comparing selection differentials and gradients among traits, populations, and species and assess their differential merits. In particular, we explain why the most widespread approach to standardizing selection, which measures selection differentials in units of a trait's phenotypic standard deviation, is less appropriate for characterizing the strengths of natural selection in wild populations. In contrast, an alternative standardization approach that uses a trait's phenotypic mean in addition to its standard deviation results in another dimensionless measure: the mean-standardized selection gradient. This measure offers some key benefits over alternative approaches, such as ease of interpretation, independence of a trait's variance, and the natural interplay of ecological and evolutionary dynamics, and yet it remains rarely used by evolutionary biologists. We explain how the more routine application of this measure will facilitate comparisons of selection strengths in the wild among traits, populations, and species.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2012
Standardizing Selection Strengths to Study Selection in the Wild: A Critical Comparison and Suggestions for the Future
Shuichi Matsumura,
Robert Arlinghaus,
Ulf Dieckmann
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
It is not available for individual sale.
This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
It is not available for individual sale.

BioScience
Vol. 62 • No. 12
December 2012
Vol. 62 • No. 12
December 2012
elasticity
NATURAL SELECTION
selection differential
selection gradient
Standardization