Translator Disclaimer
15 March 2019 Notes on the breeding biology of birds in riverine floodplains of western Amazonia
Author Affiliations +

We present new information on the breeding biology of six bird species from riverine floodplains in Brazilian and Ecuadorian Amazonia, principally from the Madeira River, near Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil, but also the Napo River in eastern Ecuador. We describe for the first time the nest of White-bellied Spinetail Mazaria propinqua. The data presented contribute to our cumulative knowledge of the natural history of birds in floodplain forests, a historically neglected environment in the Amazon.

In general, knowledge of the breeding biology of Neotropical birds remains limited, and many species still lack basic descriptions of their nests and eggs (Marini et al. 2010, Xiao et al. 2017). In the Amazon Basin, many species are practically unknown in terms of basic aspects of their natural history. This lack of knowledge is even more profound for birds that occur in the biome's floodplains (Remsen & Parker 1983), which historically have received less attention than upland species (Cohn-Haft et al. 2007). Here, we provide new data on the breeding biology of six species nesting in this floodplain habitat, based on field work in Brazil and Ecuador.

The Ecuadorian study site (HFG) was on the banks of the upper Napo River near Ahuano, prov. Napo, at 375 m (01°01′57.4″S, 77°35′11.7″W). This area is flat and rocky, with isolated patches of regenerating vegetation dominated by Gynerium cane and small, fast-growing trees and shrubs (e.g., Inga, Cecropia, Calliandra). The area is flooded several times annually, usually in May–July (see Greeney 2014 for further information). The Brazilian locality, studied by TNM, lies on the upper Madeira River, in the municipality of Porto Velho and the district of Jaci Paraná, state of Rondônia, in south-west Brazilian Amazonia. The Madeira is the largest muddy-water affluent of the Solimões / Amazonas system, and one of the largest rivers in the world, accounting for 50% of sediment input and 15% of total discharge in the Solimões / Amazonas system (Goulding et al. 2003, Latrubesse et al. 2017). The Madeira basin covers 1,380 km2, or 20.1% of the Amazon Basin (Goulding et al. 2003). The river rises in the Bolivian Andes and has a total length of 3,400 km, of which 1,500 km flows through Brazilian territory. Mean rainfall in the Madeira basin varies from 2,000 to 2,500 mm, with the wet season in December–April and the peak flood downstream of Porto Velho in March–April, with large variations in water level, 10.8–12.4 m difference between the dry and wet seasons (Goulding et al. 2003). Data were collected sporadically, using binoculars. Nest descriptions follow the nomenclature proposed by Simon & Pacheco (2005).

WHITE-BEARDED HERMIT Phaethornis hispidus

On 15 June 2018 TNM found an empty hummingbird nest in the understorey of várzea forest c.56 km downstream of Porto Velho (08°35′33.7″S, 63°34′54.3″W). When revisited on 9 July 2018, the nest contained two nestlings, with their eyes still closed (Fig. 1). After a few minutes, an adult P. hispidus appeared and fed the nestlings. The nest, a funnel-shaped cup, was sited 1.01 m above ground in a Costus (Costaceae) plant (Fig. 1). The cup measured 31 × 52 mm internally, and was 130 mm tall externally, with an elongated ‘tail’ of 70 mm at the base of the cup. The nest comprised fine, pale, dry palm fibres, tightly bound with spider webs, and attached to the underside of a damaged strip of leaf. Overall, the nest's shape, composition, height and attachment were similar to those of a nest of the species found in June 2016, in Mato Grosso state, Brazil (C. P. Figueiredo; The elongated leaf of Costus sp. used here, offered a similar substrate to the leaves of understorey palms, which are among the most frequently used nest substrates of the genus Phaethornis (Ruschi 1949, Oniki 1970, Greeney et al. 2018).

Figure 1.

White-bearded Hermit Phaethornis hispidus nest with two nestlings, Rondônia, Brazil, June 2018 (Tomaz Nascimento de Melo)


Figure 2.

Plain-winged Antshrike Thamnophilus schistaceus fledgling, Rondônia, Brazil, June 2018 (Tomaz Nascimento de Melo)


PLAIN-WINGED ANTSHRIKEThamnophilus schistaceus

On 15 June 2018 a pair of T. schistaceus was observed in the same floodplain forest as that where the nest of Phaethornis hispidus was found. The two birds gave constant alarm calls and circled me. Searching for a possible nest, a single fledgling was found, perched 2 m above ground (Fig. 2). From its appearance, the young had probably fledged the same or previous day. Nests have been described from Brazil in February and October, and from Peru in March and September (Zimmer & Isler 2003).


On 17 February 2011, HFG observed an adult spinetail carrying food to a nest at the Ecuadorian locality described above. Three days later, while examining the nest, a single fledgling flew from its entrance and disappeared into a nearby tangle of vegetation. On 24 February he collected the nest and made the following observations. The nest was an enclosed, globular mass of dry vegetative material, entered via a laterally oriented tube, and sited 60 cm above ground. It was supported from below by three nearly horizontal crisscrossed stalks of Gynerium cane and many smaller stems and leaf blades. Overall, the nest was 300 mm long, including the globular portion that contained the nest chamber and the 120 mm-long entrance tube. Externally, the tube was c.130 mm wide and 110 mm tall, with a near-circular, upward-facing opening at the distal end, 40 mm in diameter. The main portion of the nest was 160 mm wide externally (measured perpendicularly to the entrance tube) and 200 mm tall. The nest and entrance fairly uniformly comprised coarsely interwoven dead sticks and thick leaf petioles, with the exception of a 5–6 cm-thick layer of additional materials piled atop the nest chamber. The additional materials, including Gynerium leaf blades, bark strips and a few pieces of plastic, were wider and more pliable than the sticks used elsewhere in the construction, and undoubtedly served both as camouflage and waterproofing. Internally, the nest chamber was roughly spherical, 80 mm in diameter. It was unlined except a c.1–2 cm-thick cup of soft materials covering the bottom and forming a loose, poorly shaped cup (Fig. 3A). Internally, the cup was approximately 60 mm wide and 15–20 mm deep (post-fledge), and comprised fragments of skeletonised leaves, small, soft, papery dicot leaves, seed down, and fragments of snake skin.

On 6 July 2018 a pair was observed building a nest on Ilha dos Bufalos (09°10′51.6″S, 64°30′45.2″W), Jaci Paraná, Brazil. The site is dominated by Tessaria integrifolia (Asteraceae) reaching 4–5 m above ground and by Echinochloa sp. (Poaceae), up to 1 m tall. The only material used to construct the nest was fine twigs of T. integrifolia. The two birds observed building vocalised frequently. The nest was sited 1.63 m above ground and the interior measured 130 × 105 mm (Fig. 3). A complete but a arently old nest was found within 5 m of that under construction, presumably from an earlier breeding effort. This latter nest conformed to the closed globular type (Fig. 3B), the entrance via a horizontal tube (Fig. 3C) of the same shape and material of that under construction. Like the nest under construction, it was sited in the fork of a T. integrifolia 1.26 m above ground, and measured 220 mm high by 230 mm long by 150 mm wide, with an access tube 80 mm long and an entrance hole 45 × 38 mm.

Figure 3.

Nests of White-bellied Spinetail Mazaria propinqua showing interior chamber of the nest found on the upper Napo River, Ecuador, in February 2011 (A), and the nest found on a river island in the Madeira River, Rondônia, Brazil, July 2018, in lateral view (B) and its entrance (C) (A: Harold F. Greeney; B–C: Tomaz Nascimento de Melo)


Although a photo on Wikiaves illustrates a nest, also found on an island in the Madeira in December (R. S. Moreira;, and two pairs were reported to be constructing nests on an island in the Branco River, northern Brazil, in mid October (Naka et al. 2007), ours are the first descriptions of this species' nest (Schulenberg & Rosenberg 2016), which is similar to that of related species of Furnariidae (Zyskowski & Prum 1999). The Ecuadorian nest fledged during the dry–wet season transition in that region (Blake & Loiselle 2012). The active nests in July and December indicate that the species breeds both early and late in the wet season along the Madeira River.

SPECKLED SPINETAIL Cranioleuca gutturata

On 15 June 2018 a nest under construction was found in a lowland forest, c.200 m from the Phaethornis hispidus nest described above. An adult was observed collecting green mosses in a nearby tree and depositing the material in the nest, which was a globular closed construction c.200 mm tall, of dry leaves and green mosses, especially the latter (Fig. 4), with a lateral entrance. The nest was sited on the fork of a branch of Protium sp. (Burseraceae), c.7 m above ground. On returning to the site on 10 July, the nest was apparently empty and no adult was observed. It is unknown whether the nest had been abandoned or not. There are very few published data concerning the species' breeding biology: Remsen (2003) mentioned nestbuilding in mid August in Peru, and the nest reported here was obviously similar to that described previously. A nest found in January, also in Brazil, was of similar shape and size, but with less green moss used in the construction (D. P. Fernandes;

Figure 4.

Nest of Specked Spinetail Cranioleuca gutturata in floodplain várzea forest, Rondônia, Brazil, June 2018 (Tomaz Nascimento de Melo)


Figure 5.

Nest of Spotted Tody-Flycatcher Todirostrum maculatum constructed on the root of a Capsiandra sp. (Fabaceae) near the Madeira River, Rondônia, Brazil, July 2018 (Tomaz Nascimento de Melo)


SPOTTED TODY-FLYCATCHER Todirostrum maculatum

On 8 July 2018 a nest was found on Ilha do Veados, 53 km downstream of Porto Velho (08°33′52.8″S, 63°38′46.6″W). Just one nestling was present, already with open eyes and completely feathered, and was being fed by the adults. The nest was sited in the aerial portion of a root of a Capsiandra sp. (Fabaceae), c.5 m from the bank of the Madeira River and 1.29 m above ground. It was a closed / oval structure, 200 mm long by 75 mm wide. Its lower portion also comprised an elongated ‘tail’ of 210 mm (Fig. 5). The nest entrance, located at one side, measured 25 × 35 mm. This species' breeding biology is comparatively well known, with eggs found throughout the year across its range, and the nest reported above is similar to previous descriptions (Walther 2004).

EULER'S FLYCATCHER Lathrotriccus euleri

On 6 September 2017 a nest was discovered in the same lowland forest where those of Phaethornis hispidus and Cranioleuca gutturata were found, sited in a dried cocoa Theobroma cacao fruit (Malvaceae), 1.24 m above ground (Fig. 6). The entrance was a hole in the side of the fruit, and the interior was covered by dark rootlets, small fibres and green moss, forming a shallow cup. It was not possible to take measurements, but the nest held two pinkish eggs with reddish-brown spots at the large end. Only one adult was observed at the nest. This species constucts a cup-shaped nest of fibres, and uses small holes (Farnsworth & Lebbin 2004). Londoño (2014) depicted a similar nest, in the Peruvian Amazon, with two apparently identical eggs, but constructed in a natural cavity. Possibly this is the first formal description of a nest of L. euleri in Amazonia, but its breeding biology in the south and south-east of its range is well known (Di Giacomo & López Lanús 1998, Aguilar et al. 1999, Marini et al. 2007, Auer & Bassar 2009). There, nests are shallow cups constructed in natural cavities in trees, fallen logs or in ravines, with a mean height above ground of 2 m. The clutch is two or three eggs.

Figure 6.

Nest and eggs of Euler's Flycatcher Lathrotriccus euleri in a dried cocoa Theobroma cacao fruit (Malvaceae), Rondônia, Brazil, September 2017 (Tomaz Nascimento de Melo)


Although Stouffer et al. (2013) did not identify a well-defined breeding season for central Amazonian upland birds, landscapes in the floodplains are subject to strong transformation between the dry and wet seasons due to the dynamics of the flood (Wittmann et al. 2010), which can alter the availability of nest sites (Beja et al. 2010). Of the species for which breeding activity was registered in the Madeira floodplain, five bred when water levels were falling (June/July) and one in the dry season (September). Although the same sites were sampled as in the early wet season (December), when the Madeira River is at its highest level (March) TNM did not find any evidence of nesting activity. However, Leite et al. (2016) found an active nest of Leaden Antwren Myrmotherula assimilis at the Juruá River during its peak flood (March). Environments in the floodplains change completely between the dry and wet season, creating different opportunities for nesting, presumably depending on the natural history attributes of a given species.


The Brazilian portion of this study was undertaken under the auspices of the project ‘History and diversification of floodplain forest bird communities in Amazonia: towards an integrated conservation plan’, approved by the PEER Program financed by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). TNM also thanks the Comissão de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for a scholarship and his mentors, Camila Ribas and Fernando d'Horta. Marison Prestes Pinto, Erivelton Faustino Dias Morhey and Aurimar Costa Sarmento assisted during the field work. Guy Kirwan and Gabriel Leite made suggestions concerning the submitted manuscript.


  1. Aguilar, T. M., Leite, L. O. & Marini, M. Â. 1999. Biologia da nidificação de Lahtrotriccus euleri (Cabanis, 1968) (Tyrannidae) em fragmentos de mata de Minas Gerais. Ararajuba 7: 125–133. Google Scholar

  2. Auer, S. K. & Bassar, R. D. 2009. Breeding biology of passerines in a subtropical montane forest in northwestern Argentina. Condor 109: 321–333. Google Scholar

  3. Beja, P., Santos, C. D., Santana, J., Pereira, M. J., Marques, J. T., Queiroz, H. L. & Palmeirim, J. M. 2010. Seasonal patterns of spatial variation in understory birds assemblages across a mosaic of flooded and unflooded Amazonian forests.Biodivers. & Conserv.19: 129–152. Google Scholar

  4. Blake, J. G. & Loiselle, B. A. 2012. Temporal and spatial patterns in abundance of the Wedge-billed Woodcreeper (Glyphorynchus spirurus) in lowland Ecuador.Wilson J. Orn.124: 436–445. Google Scholar

  5. Cohn-Haft, M., Pacheco, A. M. F., Bechtoldt, C. L., Torres, M. F. N. M., Fernandes, A. M., Sardelli, C. H. & Macêdo, I. T. 2007. Inventário ornitológico. Pp. 145–178in Rapp Py-Daniel, L., Deus, C. P., Henriques, A. L., Pimpão, D. M. & Ribeiro, O. M. (eds.) Biodiversidade do médio Madeira: bases científicas para propostas de conservação.Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus. Google Scholar

  6. Di Giacomo, A. G. & López Lanús, B. M. 1998. Aportes sobre la nidificación de veinte especies de aves del noroeste argentino. El Hornero 15: 29–38. Google Scholar

  7. Farnsworth, A. & Lebbin, D. 2004. Euler's Flycatcher (Lathrotriccus euleri). Pp. 354–355in del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Christie, D. A. (eds.) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 9.Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

  8. Goulding, M., Barthem, R. & Ferreira, E. 2003. The Smithsonian atlas of the Amazon.Smithsonian Books & Princeton Editorial Associates, Washington DC & London, UK. Google Scholar

  9. Greeney, H. F. 2014. The nest and eggs of Rusty-fronted Tody-flycatcher Poecilotriccus latirostris. Cotinga 36: 59–61. Google Scholar

  10. Greeney, H. F., Gualingua, D., Read, M., Puertas, C., Evans, L., Baihua, O. & Killackey, R. P. 2018. Rapid inventory, preliminary annotated checklist, and breeding records of the birds (Aves) of the Boanamo indigenous community, Orellana Province, Ecuador.Neotrop. Biodivers.4: 10–44. Google Scholar

  11. Latrubesse, E. M., Arima, E. Y., Dunne, T., Park, E., Baker, V. R., d'Horta, F. M., Wight, C., Wittmann, F., Zuanon, J., Baker, P. A., Ribas, C. C., Norgaard, R. B., Filizola, N., Ansar, A., Flyvbjerg, B. & Stevaux, J. C. 2017. Damming the rivers of the Amazon basin. Nature 546: 363–369. Google Scholar

  12. Leite, G. A., Barreiros, M. H. M., Farias, I. P. & Peres, C. A. 2016. Description of the nest of two Thamnophilidae species in Brazilian Amazon.Rev. Bras. Orn.24: 83–85. Google Scholar

  13. Marini, M. Â., Aguilar, T. M., Andrade, R. D., Leite, L. O., Anciães, M., Carvalho, C. E. A., Duca, C., Maldonado-Coelho, M., Sebaio, F. & Gonçalves, J. 2007. Biologia da nidificação de aves do sudeste de Minas Gerais, Brasil.Rev. Bras. Orn.15: 367–376. Google Scholar

  14. Marini, M. Â., Duca, C. & Manica, L. T. 2010. Técnicas de pesquisa em biologia reprodutiva de aves. Pp. 295–312in Von Matter, S., Straube, F. C., Accordi, I. A., Piacentini, V. Q. & Cândido-Jr, J. F. (eds.) Ornitologia e conservação – ciência aplicada, técnicas de pesquisa e levantamento. Ed.Technical Books, Rio de Janeiro. Google Scholar

  15. Naka, L. N., Cohn-Haft, M., Whittaker, A., Mazar Barnett, J. & Torres, M. F. 2007. Avian biogeography of Amazonian flooded forests in the rio Branco basin, Brazil.Wilson J. Orn.119: 439–449. Google Scholar

  16. Oniki, Y. 1970. Nesting behavior of Reddish Hermits (Phaethornis ruber) and occurence of wasp cells in nests. Auk 87: 720–728. Google Scholar

  17. Remsen, J. V. 2003. Speckled Spinetail (Thripophaga gutturata). P. 298in del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Christie, D. A. (eds.) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 8.Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

  18. Remsen, J. V. & Parker, T. A. 1983. Contribution of river-created habitats to bird species richness in Amazonia. Biotropica 15: 223–231. Google Scholar

  19. Schulenberg, T. S. & Rosenberg, G. H. 2016. White-bellied Spinetail (Mazaria propinqua).In Schulenberg T. S. (ed.) Neotropical Birds online.Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. Scholar

  20. Simon, J. E. & Pacheco, S. 2005. On the standardization of nest descriptions of Neotropical birds. Rev. Bras. Orn.13: 143–154. Google Scholar

  21. Stouffer, P. C., Johnson, E. I. & Bierregaard, R. O. 2013. Breeding seasonality in central Amazonian rainforest birds. Auk 130: 529–540. Google Scholar

  22. Walther, B. 2004. Spotted Tody-flycatcher (Todirostrum maculatum). P. 333in del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Christie, D. A. (eds.) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 9.Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

  23. Wittmann, F., Schöngart, J. & Junk, W. J. 2010. Phytogeography, species diversity, community structure and dynamics of central Amazonian floodplain forests. Pp. 61–102in Junk, W. J., Piedade, M. T. F., Wittmann, F., Schöngart, J. & Parolin, P. (eds.) Amazonian floodplain forests. Ecophysiology, biodiversity and sustainable management.Springer Verlag, London. Google Scholar

  24. Xiao, H., Hu, Y., Lang, Z., Fang, B., Guo, W., Zhang, Q., Pan, X. & Lu, X. 2017. How much do we know about the breeding biology of bird species in the world?J. Avian Biol.48: 513–518. Google Scholar

  25. Zimmer, K. J. & Isler, M. L. 2003. Plain-winged Antshrike (Thamnophilus schistaceus). P. 554in del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Christie, D. A. (eds.) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 8.Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

  26. Zyskowski, K. & Prum R. O. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of the nest architecture of Neotropical ovenbirds (Furnariidae). Auk 116: 891–911. Google Scholar

© 2019 The Authors; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Tomaz Nascimento de Melo and Harold F. Greeney "Notes on the breeding biology of birds in riverine floodplains of western Amazonia," Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 139(1), (15 March 2019).
Received: 9 October 2018; Published: 15 March 2019

Back to Top