Translator Disclaimer
15 March 2019 A population of Greater Ground Robin Amalocichla sclateriana (Petroicidae) from central New Guinea
Author Affiliations +

Greater Ground Robin Amalocichla sclateriana is a large, terrestrial petroicid endemic to the high mountain forests of New Guinea (Beehler & Pratt 2016). It is known from three isolated populations (Fig. 1)—A. s. occidentalis in the vicinity of Lake Habbema in the eastern Sudirman Range (Snow Mountains); A. s. sclateriana on the Papuan Peninsula; and a population in the Saruwaged Range on the Huon Peninsula (Freeman et al. 2013). There is a gap of more than 900 km between previously confirmed localities along New Guinea's central cordillera. However, the species is elusive (e.g. Mayr & Rand 1937) and scarce in some known localities, and there are unconfirmed aural records from central New Guinea at Tari Gap and in the Kaijende Highlands (Beehler 1993, Beehler & Sine 2007).

In 2017 a population of A. sclateriana was discovered by camera trapping on Hides Ridge (05°55.1′S, 142°41.7′E; Fig. 2), a broad limestone ridge extending some 20 km south-east from the Muller Range and rising to c.2,800 m above sea level west of the Tagari River valley in Hela Province, Papua New Guinea. The site is midway between previously confirmed localities at Lake Habbema and Mount Kumbak at the base of the Papuan Peninsula, and less than 65 km from unconfirmed sites at Tari Gap and Kaijende (Fig. 1).

As part of an ongoing monitoring programme, in May–August 2017 we deployed 20 white-flash digital camera traps (Reconyx PC850) within a c.150 ha sampling area on the upper section of Hides Ridge, at 2,645–2,730 m, for a total of 1,848 camera days. Terrain is characterised by polygonal karst with networking and sub-parallel ridgelines interspersed by dolines and valleys. Vegetation is small-crowned evergreen montane forest with Nothofagus a canopy dominant. There are heavy epiphyte loads and, in many areas, a dense layer of moss covers the ground, rocks and most woody subcanopy surfaces.

Figure 1.

Confirmed localities of Greater Ground Robin Amalocichla sclateriana (Coates 1990, Beehler & Pratt 2016;  www.vertnet.org). Land above 2,600 m is shaded darker grey.

f01_85.jpg

Figure 2.

Camera trap images of Greater Ground Robin Amalocichla sclateriana, Hides Ridge, Hela Province, Papua New Guinea.

f02_85.jpg

Figure 3.

Activity pattern of Greater Ground Robin Amalocichla sclateriana on Hides Ridge. X-axis shows the start time for each 30-minute sampling period.

f03_85.jpg

Of 18 bird species camera trapped at the site, A. sclateriana was among the most frequently photographed, with 80 independent events (≥60 minutes apart; Burton et al. 2015) recorded across 14 camera positions (70%). This event rate was marginally higher than that recorded for Wattled Brushturkey Aepypodius arfakianus (77 events) and lower only than that of New Guinea Woodcock Scolopax rosenbergii (123 events) and Lesser Melampitta Melampitta lugubris (116 events). Individuals were photographed throughout the diurnal period with the major peak in activity between 07.30 h and 09.30 h (Fig. 3).

A. sclateriana was recorded at both the highest and lowest camera positions at this site. Its occurrence at 2,645 m is slightly below the previously reported lower limit of 2,700 m (Beehler & Pratt 2016). While the unconfirmed Tari Gap record is from c.2,400 m (Beehler 1993), cameras deployed at a second site on Hides Ridge failed to detect the species at 2,190–2,390 m, where it was replaced by Lesser Ground Robin A. incerta.

Assuming A. sclateriana occurs locally as low as 2,600 m, Hides Ridge currently provides less than 900 ha of suitable habitat. Just 4 km to the north-west, more than 60,000 ha are available on the Muller Range. Hides Ridge and the Muller Range are connected by land above 2,300 m, and it is probable that suitable habitat was continuously present across these areas during the last glacial cycle, when montane Nothofagus forests were at about two-thirds of their present elevation (Johns et al. 2007). The current lack of records from the Muller Range may well reflect a lack of sampling—a seven-day survey at 2,875 m in the north-west of the range (‘Apalu Reke’ camp: Igag 2011) provides the only relevant published inventory—and we predict that A. sclateriana is present there.

To the east, the Kaijende–Tari area lies at the western edge of a much larger expanse of suitable habitat that extends across parts of five provinces to Mount Hagen and Mount Giluwe. It is separated from the Hides Ridge–Muller Range feature by nearly 24 km (between 2,600 m contours) with the highest link at 1,700 m across the Pori River valley. This region includes some of the most birdwatched sites in Papua New Guinea. At Tari Gap, the site of an unconfirmed encounter more than 25 years ago, the popular Ambua Lodge is less than 7 km by road west of the 2,600 m contour. However, the failure to confirm past records should not be taken as conclusive evidence that A. sclateriana is absent from this extensive area. The utility of camera traps in detecting this elusive species is here demonstrated, and we recommend their use in future searches.

Further work is required to determine whether the Hides Ridge population belongs to a known subspecies or represents a new, undescribed taxon.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to ExxonMobil PNG Limited for their funding and logistical support of the 2017 surveys. We are especially indebted to Dr Jane Mogina and to Stephen Richards for their vision and efforts in facilitating biodiversity surveys. We thank B. M. Beehler, K. D. Bishop, G. M. Kirwan and T. K. Pratt for their comments on the submitted draft. Bird surveys were conducted in accordance with the permitting procedures of the PNG Conservation and Environment Protection Authority (CEPA).

References:

  1. Beehler, B. M. 1993. Does the Greater Ground-Robin Amalocichla sclateriana inhabit Tari Gap? Muruk 6: 19. Google Scholar

  2. Beehler, B. M. & Pratt, T. K. 2016. Birds of New Guinea: distribution, taxonomy, and systematics.Princeton Univ. Press. Google Scholar

  3. Beehler, B. M. & Sine, R. 2007. Birds of the Kaijende Highlands, Enga Province, Papua New Guinea. Pp. 47–51 and 94–96in Richards, S. J. (ed.) A rapid biodiversity assessment of the Kaijende Highlands, Enga Province, Papua New Guinea.RAP Bull. Biol. Assess. 45. Conservation International, Arlington, VA. Google Scholar

  4. Burton, A. C., Neilson, E., Moreira, D., Ladle, A., Steenweg, R., Fisher, J. T., Bayne, E. & Boutin, S. 2015. Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes.J. App. Ecol.52: 675–685. Google Scholar

  5. Freeman, B. G., Class, A., Mandeville, J., Tomassi, S. & Beehler, B. M. 2013. Ornithological survey of the mountains of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea.Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl.133: 4–18. Google Scholar

  6. Igag, P.2011. 2011. Birds of the Muller Range, Western and Southern Highlands Provinces, Papua New Guinea. Pp. 198–202in Richards, S. J. & Gamui, B. G. (eds.) Rapid biological assessment of the Nakanai Mountains and the upper Strickland Basin: surveying the biodiversity of Papua New Guinea's sublime karst environments.RAP Bull. Biol. Assess. 60. Conservation International, Arlington, VA. Google Scholar

  7. Johns, R. J., Shea, G. A., Vink, W. & Pratito, P. 2007. Montane vegetation of Papua. Pp. 977–1024in Marshall, A. J. & Beehler, B. M. (eds.) The ecology of Papua, pt. 2.Periplus Editions, Hong Kong. Google Scholar

  8. Mayr, E. & Rand, A. L. 1937. Results of the Archbold Expeditions. 14. Birds of the 1933–1934 Papuan expedition.Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.73: 1–248. Google Scholar

© 2019 The Authors; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Iain A. Woxvold & and Leo Legra "A population of Greater Ground Robin Amalocichla sclateriana (Petroicidae) from central New Guinea," Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 139(1), (15 March 2019). https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v139i1.2019.a8
Received: 29 January 2019; Published: 15 March 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE
3 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top