Translator Disclaimer
15 June 2021 Elevation of two subspecies of Dunnock Prunella modularis to species rank
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Western Palearctic endemic Dunnock Prunella modularis was recently revealed to comprise three distinct genetic lineages, each distributed in different Pleistocene refugia. Specifically, one is isolated in the Iberian refugium, another is confined to the Caucasus refugium, and the third is distributed in both the Italian and Balkan refugia, as well as across broader Europe. There is a probable absence of gene flow between the refugia. Analysis of plumage and song characteristics reveals robust differences between the Iberian subspecies P. m. mabbotti, Caucasian P. m. obscura and nominate P. m. modularis. Our assessments, in conjunction with genetic isolation, support species recognition under the Phylogenetic, Biological and Comprehensive Biological Species Concepts, via qualitative and quantitative criteria, and diagnosability. We thus propose the elevation of Iberian Dunnock P. mabbotti and Caucasian Dunnock P. obscura to species level.

Dunnock Prunella modularis is a common songbird species that is endemic to the Western Palearctic. Some north European populations migrate short distances to winter in southern Europe, whereas populations breeding in the latter region are largely sedentary (del Hoyo & Collar 2016). No fewer than 15 subspecies have been described, with several having ranges largely circumscribed by peninsular (e.g., Iberia), insular (British Isles) or montane regions (e.g., Caucasus). Subspecific descriptions have been based on plumage differences, and in a few cases qualitative assessments of mensural characters; assessments of vocalisations have been restricted to P. m. occidentalis from England (e.g., Cramp 1988). Since their formal description, many Dunnock taxa have been subsumed into other races (Table 1), and recent treatments vary in recognising as many as eight (Cramp 1988, del Hoyo & Collar 2016, Gill et al. 2020) to just three subspecies (Dickinson & Christidis 2014, Shirihai & Svensson 2018). None of these decisions was based on genetic data.

In our recent phylogeographic study of the Dunnock (Drovetski et al. 2018a), sampling included individuals from the distributions of P. m. modularis (most of central and northern Europe), P. m. obscura Hablizl, 1783 (north-east Turkey, Caucasus, north Iran), P. m. occidentalis E. Hartert, 1910 (Britain and west France), P. m. mabbotti Harper, 1919 (French Pyrenees, Iberia, and possibly the Italian Apennines and Greece; recent treatments are in conflict) and P. m. meinertzhageni Harrison & Pateff, 1937 (former Yugoslavia and Bulgaria).

The results of the Drovetski et al. (2018a) study placed Dunnocks into one of three highly supported clades, each distributed in different Pleistocene refugia: a Caucasus clade, an Iberian clade, and a clade comprising all other individuals, including from the Balkans. Gene-flow analysis indicated that the Caucasus and Iberian clades were isolated from each other, as well as from the remaining clade, in which extensive gene flow was evident between Italy, the Balkans (Montenegro, Serbia and Greece) and broader Europe. Based on this genetic isolation, we suggested that Dunnock comprises three species (Drovetski et al. 2018a), which was supported by molecular species delimitation. Here we summarise in more detail the morphological and vocalisation data supporting the elevation of two Dunnock subspecies, corresponding to the Iberian and Caucasus clades described by Drovetski et al. (2018), to species status. In addition, we suggest that P. m. meinertzhageni of the former Yugoslavia and Bulgaria be synonymised with the nominate subspecies.

TABLE 1

The eight subspecies of Prunella modularis currently recognised by Gill et al. (2020) and their type localities, and their treatment under other modern classifications.

img-z2-2_199.gif

Material and Methods

Based on our genetic results (Drovetski et al. 2018), we compared specimens collected during the breeding season from the distributions of the three Dunnock lineages to their original descriptions (as subspecies) in order to verify the accuracy and validity of the proposed distinguishing characters. We analysed specimens held in the American Museum of Natural History, New York (AMNH), National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC (USNM), Biodiversity Research and Teaching Collection Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (TCWC), and Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Carmagnola, Italy (MCCI). Specifically, we sought to assess if the plumage characters used in the original descriptions were in fact diagnostic. We analysed 50 specimens of P. m. modularis, 17 of P. m. mabbotti and 14 of P. m. obscura (Appendix 1). To visualise plumage variation among these taxa, we present photographs of the ventral, lateral and dorsal aspects of specimens of these lineages, including the holotype of P. m. mabbotti at USNM (Fig. 1). All photographed specimens were collected between late April and early June, and are therefore in breeding plumage. We also provide pictures of live individuals of the same taxa, photographed in the breeding season (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Specimens of the three Dunnock taxa considered in this work in dorsal, ventral and lateral views. A. Prunella [modularis] modularis, USNM 640862 (female; left) and USNM 640847 (male; right), Greece. B. P. [m.] mabbotti, first pair USNM 256648 (female; left) and USNM 256755 (type specimen, male; right), French Pyrenees; second pair USNM 317499 (female; left), and USNM 317500 (male; right), Spain. C. P. [m.] obscura, USNM 640349 (female; left) and USNM 640358 (male; right), Greater Caucasus (S. V. Drovetski)

img-z3-1_199.jpg

Figure 2.

Individuals of the three Dunnock taxa considered herein. A. Prunella [modularis] modularis, UK (© L. Pulawski). B. P. [m.] modularis, Ireland (© B. Carruthers). C. P. [m.] modularis, UK (© K. Johnson). D. P. [m.] mabbotti, Spain (© D. Jauvin). E. P. [m.] mabbotti, Spain (© D. Petterson). F. P. [m.] mabbotti, Spain (© P. Alves). G. P. [m.] obscura, Armenia (© P. Adriaens). H. P. [m.] obscura, Georgia (© O. Nabrovenko). I. P. [m.] obscura, Iran (© C. Mroczko)

img-z4-1_199.jpg

We also compared songs of the three lineages, by using the Xeno-canto database ( www.xenocanto.org) to select good-quality recordings made during the breeding season in the distributions of the three taxa. We analysed 125 phrases of P. m. modularis, 31 of P. m. mabbotti and 11 of P. m. obscura (Appendix 2). The sonograms (Figs. 34) and the analyses were prepared using the software Praat (Boersma & Weenink 2020). For each analysed phrase, we calculated the total length (in seconds) and the frequency range, including min. and max. (in kHz). We also evaluated whether rattles were present (Constantine & The Sound Approach 2006: 38–39) and, if so, assessed their length and frequency range. To assess if differences between taxa were significant, we calculated p-value and Cohen's d value (Table 2).

Results

Plumage characteristics.—Dunnock P. modularis sensu lato has a grey to brownish head with streaky ear-coverts, plain to mottled crown, a heavily streaked mantle, and grey to brown breast grading to dusky white on the central belly, with the body-sides streaked buff-brown. The three subspecies assessed here (central European P. m. modularis, Iberian P. m. mabbotti and Caucasian P. m. obscura) show clear plumage differences relative to each other (Figs. 12). In particular, P. m. mabbotti (Figs. 1B, 2D–F) can be distinguished from other taxa of P. modularis by plumage differences listed in the original description (Harper 1919). Specifically, it differs from P. m. modularis (Figs. 1A, 2A–C) by its greyer, less rufescent back, mantle and wings, with their feather edgings buffy brown and smoke grey instead of cinnamon-brown as in P. m. modularis (Harper 1919), and their centres are brown instead of black as in P. m. modularis. Ventrally, P. m. mabbotti is less grey than P. m. modularis but closer in appearance to the latter than either is to P. m. obscura (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, the head of P. m. mabbotti is not as grey as, and lacks the brown streaking on crown and cheeks of, P. m. modularis and the former's ear-coverts are not as brown as those of the latter, conveying the impression of a plain face in P. m. mabbotti.

Figure 3.

Sonograms of songs of Dunnock taxa considered in this work. A. Prunella [modularis] modularis, XC 392787 (J. Matusiak;  www.xeno-canto.org/392787), Slovakia. B. P. [m.] modularis, XC 132703 (J. Matusiak;  www.xeno-canto.org/132703), Poland. C. P. [m.] mabbotti, XC 342428 (A. Tomás;  www.xeno-canto.org/342428), Portugal. D. P. [m.] mabbotti, XC 471699 (J. Calvet;  www.xeno-canto.org/471699), Spain. E. P. [m.] obscura, XC 480650 (A. Lastukhin;  www.xeno-canto.org/480650), Azerbaijan. F. P. [m.] obscura, XC 139532 (F. Deroussen; w www.xeno-canto.org/139532), Georgia. Sonograms generated using Praat (Boersma & Weenink 2020).

img-z5-1_199.jpg

P. m. obscura is distinguished from the other taxa of P. modularis primarily by the plumage characters reported in the original description (Hablizl 1783; see also del Hoyo & Collar 2016). These differences are particularly evident on the head: buff-tinged chin, brownish nape (not grey), light brown plain supercilium (vs. pure grey in P. m. modularis), and light brown and finely streaked crown. Further differences include back feathers with ill-defined chestnut streaks, and distinctly darker breast, compared to the other lineages, and throat to breast extensively marked with off-white or pale buff feather tips, forming a scaly pattern. Overall, P. m. obscura is much darker ventrally and more rufous-brown overall than the other two lineages, with less contrast between the grey and brown tones, a pattern approaching that of Japanese Accentor P. rubida.

Figure 4.

Sonograms of calls of Dunnock taxa considered in this work. A. Prunella [modularis] modularis, XC107150 (P. Åberg;  www.xeno-canto.org/107150), Sweden. B. P. [m.] mabbotti, XC335177 (C. Mroczko;  www.xeno-canto.org/335177), Spain. C. P. [m.] obscura, XC512728 (C. Mroczko;  www.xeno-canto.org/512728), Iran. Sonograms generated using the software Praat (Boersma & Weenink 2020).

img-z6-1_199.jpg

Mensural data reported in the literature show great overlap between the various subspecies, with none available for breeding birds from Iberia and southern France (P. m. mabbotti) (Cramp 1988, Shirihai & Svensson 2018), thus we did not consider these parameters in our analysis.

Vocalisations.—The song of P. modularis sensu lato is a rather loud warble, usually 2.0–3.5 seconds long, and quite formless in that the notes lack a distinct structure (Fig. 3). The song of P. modularis sensu lato shows more prolonged units in the frequency range 4–6 kHz, and brief and sharply modulated units at 3–7 kHz with peaks up to 8 kHz. All units typically comprise different notes, apart from repetitions of a trill or rattle, usually once each phrase. Each male has repertoire of up to six (perhaps more) different songs, with each song usually different in all units from the others; modification to an individual's song does occur between years and during counter-singing (Cramp 1988). These factors combine to render comparisons across lineages difficult, and furthermore the availability of recordings of P. m. mabbotti and P. m. obscura song during the breeding season is reduced compared to those of P. m. modularis.

TABLE 2

Measurements of sound parameters in Prunella [modularis] modularis, P. [m.] mabbotti and P. [m.] obscura. Means and standard deviations are given. s = seconds; Cohen's d = effect size in terms of magnitude.

img-ACMLD_199.gif

Despite these difficulties, our comparison of songs did reveal some variation that seems to permit discrimination between P. m. modularis, P. m. mabbotti and P. m. obscura. Analysis demonstrates that the songs of P. m. mabbotti are higher pitched (with peaks up to 9 kHz) with the rattle repeated more frequently within the phrase (Fig. 3C–D). Specifically, P. m. mabbotti had two rattles in 81% of examined phrases and occasionally a third at the start of the phrase (Table 2), whereas in P. m. modularis 64% of examined songs possessed just a single rattle. On the other hand, the song of P. m. obscura (Fig. 3E–F) is longer and lower pitched (barely exceeding 7 kHz) than both P. m. modularis and P. m. mabbotti, and lacks the typical rattles of the other two (with one exception where a faint rattle was present). Most differences we identified are statistically significant, but effect size is relatively low based on Cohen's d values (Table 2).

Dunnock also produces a wide variety of calls (Cramp 1988), which makes their comparison rather complicated. Similar types of calls across the three taxa show very slight differences, with P. m. obscura being of lower frequency (kHz) and repeated more frequently than the other two (Fig. 4). As such, calls seem to have little bearing for distinguishing taxa.

Species concept criteria.—Diagnosability is an obvious threshold for recognising species, and diagnosable characters vary across species. In a recent study that used both morphological and genetic data to assess avian diversity, Barrowclough et al. (2016) postulated that recognised biological species each harbour on average 1.97 phylogenetic species based on a criterion of morphological diagnosability. Their genetic estimates found an average of 2.4 phylogenetic species per biological species. In other words, each biological species appears to include on average two phylogenetic species.

Our previous genetic results (Drovetski et al. 2018a), which included a species delimitation method, and Bayesian and gene-flow analyses, clearly indicated that the three lineages are reproductively isolated with no gene flow. It is highly unlikely that adding more genes (we used 11) or samples (we included 13 for Iberia, 36 for the Caucasus and 66 for the remaining clade) would alter our interpretation of reproductive isolation (see, e.g., Felsenstein 2006). Based on reproductive isolation and independent evolutionary trajectories (Drovetski et al. 2018a), the obvious plumage differences identified by previous works (summarised above), and song differences documented here, we suggest that P. modularis comprises three species under the Phylogenetic Species Concept (Cracraft 1983). Considering that an independent evolutionary history is what ultimately identifies a species (see Zachos et al. 2013), we consider our genetic data sufficient to also recognise the three lineages as species in accord with both the Biological Species Concept (for which reproductive isolation is the paramount issue; Mayr 1963) and the Comprehensive Biological Species Concept (Johnson et al. 1999). Our proposal to recognise three species is also consistent with the criteria proposed by Helbig et al. (2002), as all are diagnosable by plumage, mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, with differences in song.

Offering further support is that two Dunnock lineages (P. m. modularis and P. m. mabbotti) are probably parapatric (we can find no records to indicate sympatry) in southwest France, and that P. m. obscura is isolated from P. m. modularis (and other described subspecies) in the Caucasus and adjacent regions. Finally, we suggest that the length of time since lineages are estimated to have diverged should not be a factor in recognising species; to suggest otherwise seems notional rather than evidence-based. For example, Motacilla species diverged more recently than Prunella species, but the former are often accepted as separate species (Drovetski et al. 2018b). Among the Prunella radiation, of the 14 recognised species, ten (including P. modularis) are estimated to have diverged from their closest relative within the last two million years, and the most recent divergence was just 0.13 million years ago (between Brown Accentor P. fulvescens and Kozlov's Accentor P. koslowi; Drovetski et al. 2013).

Taxonomic assessment

Considering the various aspects detailed above, we propose the following taxonomic arrangement for European Dunnock taxa.

Prunella modularis (Linnaeus, 1758) Common Dunnock

Remarks.—P. modularis is distributed in Europe from Scandinavia and the British Isles to France and northern Italy, and east to the eastern slope of the Ural Mountains (Cramp 1988, Shirihai & Svensson 2018). Based on our molecular work (Drovetski et al. 2018a), which included samples from the former Yugoslavia and Greece that were embedded within those from elsewhere in the range of the nominate subspecies, we propose that P. m. meinertzhageni be synonymised with P. m. modularis, as already suggested by Ripley (1964) and Shirihai & Svensson (2018). Placing this taxon in synonymy means that the range of P. m. modularis is expanded to include the Balkans and Greece. This species is polytypic and includes the following subspecies: P. m. hebridium, P. m. occidentalis, P. m. modularis, P. m. fuscata, and P. m. euxina.

Prunella mabbotti Harper, 1919, Iberian Dunnock, new rank

Remarks.—Although this taxon has been considered a synonym of P. modularis by some authors (e.g., Dickinson & Christidis 2014, Shirihai & Svensson 2018), our results confirm its validity. P. mabbotti is distributed in the Iberian Peninsula and French Pyrenees (the type locality), where it is apparently resident (Cramp 1988). Vaurie (1955: 24) noted that two birds from the Pyrenees, two from central Spain and three from Portugal were similar to each other, and distinguishable from P. m. modularis. However, Vaurie (1955) erroneously attributed these birds to P. m. lusitanica Stresemann, 1928, a substitute name introduced for P. m. obscura Tratz, 1914, a junior homonym of P. obscura (Hablizl, 1783). Vaurie (1955) synonymised P. m. mabbotti with P. m. lusitanica but following Art. 60 of the International code of zoological nomenclature (replacement of junior homonyms) (ICZN 1999), the species-group name mabbotti Harper, 1919, has priority over its synonym lusitanica. We elaborate on this to eliminate future confusion, because while the nomenclatural priority is widely recognised, it has not been explicitly detailed in some recent works (e.g., Ripley 1964, Cramp 1988, Hatchwell 2005).

Based on our genetic results (Drovetski et al. 2018a), P. mabbotti does not occur in either Greece or the Italian Alps. The possible presence of P. mabbotti in the Apennines (northern to southern Italy) requires confirmation. While some treatments suggest this distribution as possible (e.g., Cramp 1988, Hatchwell 2005), the supporting rationale is unclear and the morphology of individuals we examined (specimens and photos of live birds) from the region are attributable to P. modularis. In addition, a preliminary genetic analysis of a recently fledged bird sampled in Abruzzo (central Italy) revealed a relationship with P. modularis, not P. mabbotti (L. Ilahiane pers. comm. 2021). Elsewhere, P. mabbotti is occasionally listed for south-central France (e.g., Hatchwell 2005) which implies a distribution on the north-east slopes of the Pyrenees, which is where the type locality is situated. As such, the northern limits of P. mabbotti relative to south-west France populations of P. modularis are not well defined, but these two forms are probably parapatric in this area, as corroborated by photographs of live birds during the breeding season. It appears that the eastern Pyrenees are occupied by Iberian Dunnocks (see, e.g.,  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/39468304,  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/67241118), whereas in the western Pyrenees, where the mountains are lower, and in extreme northern Spain Common Dunnock occurs in an extension from its French distribution (see, e.g.,  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/67829328,  https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/245589781). We consider P. mabbotti to be monotypic.

Prunella obscura (Hablizl, 1783), Caucasian Dunnock, new rank

Remarks.—The distribution of P. obscura is the Caucasus region, Transcaucasia, north-east Turkey and northern Iran (type locality), where it is resident (Cramp 1988). Given this distribution, P. obscura is unlikely to intergrade with either P. m. euxina or P. m. fuscata, which appear to be restricted to north-west Turkey and Crimea, respectively. We consider P. obscura to be monotypic.

To conclude, further studies based on sampling and morphological characterisation of breeding Dunnocks in different parts of Spain, Portugal and the French Pyrenees could clarify the distribution and conservation status of P. mabbotti and potential contact zones with P. modularis in France and Iberia. Additional sampling is also needed to assess whether P. mabbotti is present in central Italy. Further study is necessary to confirm the relationships of P. m. occidentalis and other subspecies of P. modularis not included by Drovetski et al. (2018a), viz. P. m. hebridium Meinertzhagen, 1934 (western Scotland, Hebrides and Ireland), P. m. euxina Watson, 1961 (north-west Turkey) and P. m. fuscata Mauersberger, 1971 (Crimea), to the taxa considered herein.

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Sweet (AMNH) and B. Schmidt (USNM) for access to specimens under their care. We warmly thank all of the photographers who shared their Dunnock images with us and approved their use in this paper. G. Chiozzi is thanked for information about material in the Milano museum and G. Congi for information and photos of Dunnocks breeding in Sila, southern Italy. We also thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor for comments and suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript. This is publication no. 1644 of the Biodiversity Research and Teaching Collections at Texas A&M University, and publication no. 8 of the W.I.N.E.S. (Widespread Integration of Neoaves Evolution and Systematics) collaborative research group.

References:

1.

Barrowclough, G. F., Cracraft, J., Klicka, J. & Zink, R. M. 2016. How many kinds of birds are there and why does it matter? PLoS ONE 11: e0166307. Google Scholar

2.

Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. 2020. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.1.10.  http://www.praat.org/ (accessed 23 March 2020). Google Scholar

3.

Clements, J. F., Schulenberg, T. S., Iliff, M. J., Billerman, S. M., Fredericks, T. A., Sullivan, B. L. & Wood, C. L. 2019. The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: v2019.  https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ (accessed 23 March 2020). Google Scholar

4.

Constantine, M. & The Sound Approach. 2006. The Sound Approach to birding: a guide to understanding bird sound. The Sound Approach, Poole. Google Scholar

5.

Cracraft, J. 1983. Species concepts and speciation analysis. Current Orn. 1: 159–187. Google Scholar

6.

Cramp, S. (ed.) 1988. The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol. 5. Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar

7.

Dickinson, E. C. & Christidis, L. (eds.) 2014. The Howard and Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world, vol. 2. Fourth edn. Aves Press, Eastbourne. Google Scholar

8.

Drovetski, S. V., Semenov, G., Drovetskaya, S. S., Fadeev, I. V., Red'kin, Y. A. Voelker, G. 2013. Geographic mode of speciation in a mountain specialist avian family endemic to the Palearctic. Ecol. & Evol. 3: 1518–1528. Google Scholar

9.

Drovetski, S. V., Fadeev, I. V., Raković, M., Lopes, R. J., Boano, G., Pavia, M., Koblik, E. A., Lohman, Y. V., Red'kin, Y. A., Aghayan, S. A., Reis, S., Drovetskaya, S. S. & Voelker, G. 2018a. A test of the European Pleistocene Refugial Paradigm, using a Western Palearctic endemic bird species. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 285: 2018.1606. Google Scholar

10.

Drovetski, S. V., Reeves, A. B., Red'kin, Y. A., Fadeev, I. V., Koblik, E. A., Sotnikov, V. N. & Voelker, G. 2018b. Multi-locus reassessment of a striking discord between mtDNA gene trees and taxonomy across two congeneric species complexes. Mol. Phylo. & Evol. 120: 43–52. Google Scholar

11.

Felsenstein, J. 2006. Accuracy of coalescent likelihood estimates: do we need more sites, more sequences, or more loci? Mol. Biol. & Evol. 23: 691–700. Google Scholar

12.

Gill, F., Donsker, D. & Rasmussen, P. (eds.) 2020. IOC world bird list (v10.2).  https://doi.org/10.14344/IOC.ML.10.2 (accessed 23 March 2020). Google Scholar

13.

Hablizl, K. 1783. Bemerkungen in der persischen Landschaft Gilan und auf den Gilanischen Gebirgen. Neue Nord. Beytr. 4: 3–104. Google Scholar

14.

Hatchwell, B. J. 2005. Family Prunellidae (accentors). Pp. 496–513 in del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Christie, D. A. (eds.) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 10. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

15.

Harper, F. 1919. A new subspecies of Prunella modularis from the Pyrenees. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 32: 243–244. Google Scholar

16.

Helbig, A. J., Knox, A. J., Parkin, D. T., Sangster, G. & Collinson, M. 2002. Guidelines for assigning species rank. Ibis 144: 518–525. Google Scholar

17.

del Hoyo, J. & Collar, N. J. 2016. HBW and Birdlife International illustrated checklist of the birds of the world, vol. 2. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

18.

International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). 1999. International code of zoological nomenclature. Fourth edn. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. Google Scholar

19.

Johnson, N. K., Remsen, J. V. & Cicero, C. 1999. Resolution of the debate over species concepts in ornithology: a new comprehensive biologic species concept. Pp. 1470–1482 in Adams, N. J. & Slotow, R. H. (eds.) Proc. 22nd Intern. Orn. Congress, Durban. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg. Google Scholar

20.

Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar

21.

Ripley, S. D. 1964. Family Prunellidae, accentors. Pp. 3–12 in Mayr, E. & Paynter, R. J. (eds.) Checklist of birds of the world, vol. 10. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar

22.

Shirihai, H. & Svensson, L. 2018. Handbook of Western Palearctic birds: passerines, vol. 2. Christopher Helm, London. Google Scholar

23.

Vaurie, C. 1955. Systematic notes on Palearctic birds. No. 16. Troglodytinae, Cinclidae, and Prunellidae. Amer. Mus. Novit. 1751: 1–25. Google Scholar

24.

Zachos, F. E., Apollonio, M., Bärmann, E. V., Festa-Bianchet, M., Göhlich, U. B., Habel, J. C., Haring, E., Kruckenhauser, L., Lovari, S., McDevitt, A. D., Pertoldi, C., Rössner, G. E., Sánchez-Villagra, M. R., Scandura, M. & Suchentrunk, F. 2013. Species inflation and taxonomic artefacts – a critical comment on recent trends in mammalian classification. Mammalian Biol. 78: 1–6. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1

List of analysed specimens for each taxon. Abbreviations: AMNH: American Museum of Natural History, New York; USNM: National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC; TCWC: Biodiversity Research and Teaching Collection Texas A&M University, College Station; MCCI: Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Carmagnola.

Prunella mabbotti: AMNH 584749, July, Portugal; AMNH 584750, July, Portugal; AMNH 584752, May, France. USNM 256648, April, France; USNM 256755, April, France (type specimen); USNM 317497, May, Spain; USNM 317498, May, Spain; USNM 317499, May, Spain; USNM 317500, May, Spain; USNM 317501, May, Spain; USNM 317502, May, Spain; USNM 317503, May, Spain; USNM 317504, May, Spain; USNM 317505, May, Spain; USNM 317506, May, Spain; USNM 317508, April, Spain; USNM 317509, April, Spain.

Prunella modularis: AMNH 25035, May, England; AMNH 54484, May, England; AMNH 261763, May, Sweden; AMNH 261764, May, Sweden; AMNH 348170, April, Scotland; AMNH 348175, April, Scotland; AMNH 450916, April, England; AMNH 454255, June, England; AMNH 455661, April, Austria; AMNH 455662, April, Austria; AMNH 455665, July, Germany; AMNH 455666, July, Germany; AMNH 455667, July, Germany; AMNH 455670, July, Germany; AMNH 455671, July, Germany; AMNH 455674, April, Austria; AMNH 584699, April, England; AMNH 584702, July, England; AMNH 584713, April, England; AMNH 584723, April, England; AMNH 584768, April, Switzerland; AMNH 584769, April, Switzerland; AMNH 584773, April, Germany; AMNH 584776, April, Germany; AMNH 748654, May, Denmark; AMNH 787814, April, Germany; AMNH 787818, April, Germany. MCCI 3684, June, Italy; MCCI 3686, July, Italy; MCCI 4301, July, Italy; MCCI 4380, June, Italy; MCCI 4386, May, Italy; MCCI 4623, June, Italy. TCWC 22939, July, Italy; TCWC 22940, July, Italy; TCWC 22941, July, Italy; TCWC 22942, July, Italy; TCWC 22943, July, Italy. USNM 111121, June, Norway; USNM 113817, April, England; USNM 113818, April, England; USNM 191639, July, Switzerland; USNM 191642, July, Switzerland; USNM 234673, April, England; USNM 256647, April, France; USNM 424650, April, Denmark; USNM 637507, May, Greece; USNM 640157, May, Greece; USNM 640847, May, Greece; USNM 640862, May, Greece.

Prunella obscura: AMNH 464668, April, Iran; AMNH 584738, March, Russia; AMNH 584741, March, Russia; AMNH 584742, March, Russia. MCCI 4095, June, Armenia; MCCI 4096, June, Armenia. TCWC 21769, June, Armenia. USNM 639814, June, Russia; USNM 639823, June, Russia; USNM 639833, June, Russia; USNM 640349, June, Russia; USNM 640358, June, Russia; USNM 640381, June, Russia; USNM 640452, June, Russia.

Appendix 2

List of analysed sound recordings for each taxon. All sounds were retrieved from Xeno-canto ( www.xenocanto.org).

Prunella mabbotti: XC 34430, Spain, Juan Malo de Molina; XC 342428, Portugal, Agostinho Tomás; XC 410813, Portugal, João Tomás; XC 421712; Portugal, Jorge Leitão; XC 443925, Portugal, Jorge Leitão; XC 468269, Spain, Marcel Gil Velasco; XC 471699, Spain, Jordi Calvet; XC 472305, Spain, Jordi Calvet; XC 477802, Portugal, Jorge Leitão; XC 502693, Portugal, Jorge Leitão; XC 560619, Portugal, Jorge Leitão.

Prunella modularis: XC 46515, France, Jacques Prevost; XC62835, Norway, Holger Schielzeth; XC 70132, England, Paul Driver; XC 77229, France, Jacques Prevost; XC 77399, Denmark, Luis A. Hansen; XC 100666, Switzerland, Bram Piot; XC 101995, Denmark, Niels Krabbe; XC 102924, Switzerland, Pascal Christe; XC 111910, Denmark, Elias A. Ryberg; XC 132703, Poland, Jarek Matusiak; XC 132705, Poland, Jarek Matusiak; XC 132707, Poland, Jarek Matusiak; XC 133850, Scotland, Mike Nelson; XC 181582, Italy, Francesco Sottile; XC 183444, England, Marc Anderson; XC 192411, Norway, Stein Ø. Nilsen; XC 193374, Norway, Stijn De Win; XC 196790, England, ‘David M'; XC 243941, Switzerland, Jerome Fischer; XC 247270, Sweden, Mikael Litsgård; XC 270206, France, Peter Boesman; XC 281379, Belgium, Peter Boesman; XC 281380, Belgium, Peter Boesman; XC 325335, Lithuania, Jarek Matusiak; XC 331874, France, Cedric Mroczko; XC 335679, England, ‘David M'; XC 367329, Denmark, Luis A. Hansen; XC 371122, England, David Bissett; XC 374616, France, Manuel Grosselet; XC 374617, France, Manuel Grosselet; XC 384332, Denmark, Luis A. Hansen; XC 384369, Denmark, Luis A. Hansen; XC 389110, Germany, Antonio Xeira; XC 392787, Slovakia, Jarek Matusiak; XC 415511, Norway, Stein Ø. Nilsen; XC 420704, France, Jérémy Simar; XC 420855, Italy, Giuseppe Speranza; XC 443875, Norway, Karl-Birger Strann; XC 478151, Belgium, Peter Boesman; XC 483786, France, Jérémy Simar; XC 488737, Germany, Stephan Risch; XC 602656, Finland, Alain Malengreau.

Prunella obscura: XC 138593, Georgia, Maercin Solowiej; XC 139532, Georgia, Fernand Deroussen; XC 480650, Azerbaijan, Albert Lastukhin; XC 480651, Azerbaijan, Albert Lastukhin; XC 561010, Turkey, Lider Sinav.

© 2021 The Authors; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Marco Pavia, Sergei V. Drovetski, Giovanni Boano, Kevin W. Conway, Irene Pellegrino, and Gary Voelker "Elevation of two subspecies of Dunnock Prunella modularis to species rank," Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 141(2), 199-210, (15 June 2021). https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v141i2.2021.a10
Received: 11 January 2021; Published: 15 June 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top