Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
15 June 2021 Breeding records of Dunlin Calidris alpina in China
David S. Melville, Qing Chang, Wei Liu, Nathan H. Rice
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Dunlin Calidris alpina has been recorded as breeding in China based on a pullus collected on 7 May 1927 at Tsingtao, Shandong province; a remarkably early date for a nearly fledged young. The record appears highly unlikely to be an example of deliberate fraud, and there is no obvious evidence of mislabelling. We have been unable to determine the validity of the claimed breeding record, however, based on a review of available information, it appears certain that the species does not currently breed in China.

Dunlin Calidris alpina was reported as breeding in China by Greenwood (1980), based on the skin of a pullus in the collection of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, USA (ANSP; now the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University). The specimen (ANSP 108004) was collected by R. H. LeFevre at Tsingtao [Qingdao], Shan-tung [Shandong], China on 7 May 1927. Greenwood (1980) stated that: ‘R. M. de Schauensee (Academy of Natural Sciences) assures me that the specimen label is reliable, so there can be no doubt as to the authenticity of the specimen'. Subsequently, Meyer de Shauensee (1984) stated: ‘Breeds in Shantung Pen. (pullus)'. The specimen is a pullus, and bears a LeFevre label similar to those of other Dunlins in the collection (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Specimen of pullus (centre) Dunlin Calidris alpina reg. no. ANSP 108004, at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, with two adult specimens reg. nos. ANSP 108007 (above) and ANSP 107997 (below) (Nathan H. Rice, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University)

img-z1-5_121.jpg

Greenwood (1980) considered the bird to be ‘about 2½–3 weeks old and incapable of flight'. The bird has extensive waxy sheaths to the primaries (Fig. 2), indicating that the feathers were still growing, and that it would have been incapable of sustained flight. Dunlins typically fledge when 16–24 days old (Heldt 1966, Meltofte et al. 2007, van Gils et al. 2020, Warnock & Gill 2020), which suggests that the specimen would have hatched on about 17 April. Incubation usually lasts 20–24 days (Soikelli 1967, Cramp & Simmons 1983, van Gils et al. 2020, Warnock & Gill 2020), so laying would have been around 27 March. This is exceptionally early, being nearly a month prior to any other Dunlin breeding record. For the southern race C. a. schinzii, Witherby et al. (1940) noted ‘usually about second or third week May onward in Brit. Is. [British Isles], but exceptionally in first week of May’, whilst in southern Finland Soikelli (1967) recorded two clutches being initiated on 24 April, but most in early May. In the Russian Far East, Tomkovich (1998) reported first egg dates between late May and mid June for C. a. sakhalina, C. a. kistchinski and C. a. actites, whilst North American pacifica and arcticola may start from late May (Warnock & Gill 2020). There do not appear to have been any unusual weather conditions (temperature or rainfall) in 1927 that might have promoted exceptionally early breeding by Dunlin in Shandong; indeed annual minimum temperatures were comparatively low during 1913–38 (Guo et al. 2018) which, if anything, might be expected to delay onset of breeding (Soikelli 1967).

Figure 2.

Underwing of pullus Dunlin Calidris alpina reg. no. ANSP 108004, at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, showing extensive waxy sheaths to the bases of the primaries, indicating that these were still growing (Nathan H. Rice, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University)

img-z2-4_121.jpg

It appears that Greenwood had not seen the privately published volume by LeFevre (1962). In it, LeFevre summarises his own observations and records, including 2,658 bird specimens he collected in Shandong between 1923 and 1927. LeFevre (1962) stated: ‘All of my collection, except a few skins to Lebanon Valley College, Annville, Pennsylvania, and a few skins to Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, are deposited in the Academy of Natural Science (sic), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania'. The entry for Dunlin includes the following:

  • ‘EROLIA ALPINA SAKHALINA – (Vieillot)

  • Pacific Dunlin

  • Migrant – recorded March 10 up to May 26 and August 25 to November 29.

  • Eastern Shantung: I secured 14 birds at Tsingtao from May 7 to May 19 and also one on August 31, 1925.

  • Central Shantung: On the Wei River, I secured four birds from March 10 to March 19, 1925.'

It thus appears that in total LeFevre collected 18 Dunlins in Shandong. Of these, 12 from ‘Tsingdao' and two from the ‘Wei River' are at ANSP. The Cornell collection only has one specimen from China, but collected by H. W. Hubbard, not LeFevre (CUMV 2375, taken 1 August 1931 at ‘Peitaiho, Hopei’ [Beidaihe, Hebei],  https://webportal.cumv.cornell.edu/cumvbirds/). The Lebanon Valley College formerly had some bird specimens but these no longer exist (D. Erskine & S. Goodman in litt. 2020), so it is unknown if any of LeFevre's Dunlins went there. There is, however, one LeFevre specimen in the Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago (FMNH 406566) collected on 10 March 1926 at the Wei River ( https://collections-zoology.fieldmuseum.org/catalogue/1681412).

LeFevre (1962) recorded the following for north-east Shandong: ‘Jones [1911] found them [Dunlin] near Wei Hai Wei [Weihai] from the middle of August until October. At the latter time they were quite numerous. There is a possibility of a few breeding here'. It is thus remarkable that LeFevre made no mention of obtaining a pre-fledging juvenile in May.

Greenwood (1980) also noted that: ‘Jones (1911) … suggested that Dunlin may breed in the locality of Wei Hai Wei (Shantung peninsula), although proof of this has been lacking'. Jones (1911) reported: ‘…on the 9th of June, to the west of Wei Hai Wei, a Dunlin was obtained in full breeding-plumage, its foot being in a snare attached to a small withy, which it had pulled up when it escaped. As the Chinese set these snares near the nests of birds, there is every likelihood that this Dunlin was breeding in the neighbourhood'. Snares are widely used to catch various birds in China (Cheng 1964) and for shorebirds in Asia and the Pacific, not only at breeding sites (Kannan & Pandiyan 2012, Naves et al. 2019), thus any inference regarding the status of the Dunlin reported by Jones is extremely speculative. Moreover, the appearance of first-summer Dunlin varies, with many attaining plumage similar to adult breeding (Cramp & Simmons 1983), although it appears that most do not breed until their second year (Cramp & Simmons 1983, Warnock & Gill 2020). Small numbers of non-breeding (probably immature) Dunlins oversummer in the northern Yellow Sea/Bohai (Q. Q. Bai pers. comm.) making the presence of one in breeding plumage in early June at Wei Hai Wei not unexpected.

Swinhoe (1875) recorded several species of shorebird at Chefoo (Yantai, Shandong), but did not mention Dunlin. Hemmingsen & Guildal (1968) noted Wilder & Hubbard (1924) as recording Dunlin to be ‘found all summer [in north-east China] but breeds in arctic region', but Wilder & Hubbard (1924) actually stated: ‘Seacoast only. Recorded in eight years April 10th to Oct'. LaTouche (1931–34) recorded Dunlin as a migrant in Shantung. Shaw (1938) collected 99 specimens from Tsingdao and reported: ‘As a migrant, the Pacific or Eastern Dunlin is very common along the coast. Large flocks of one hundred or more birds were frequently met from the middle of March to the first half of May, and again from the end of September to October'. Caldwell & Caldwell (1931) stated:'Recorded from Chihli [Hebei], April to October' and, rather mysteriously, also noted ‘This bird has never been definitely reported as breeding in south China’, but they provided no information regarding any ‘unconfirmed’ reports, or reports from elsewhere in China. Sowerby (1923) collected four specimens at Pei-tai Ho [Beidaihe], Hebei on 14, 16 and 18 July, and noted ‘There can be little doubt that the specimens that I secured at Pei-tai Ho had been breeding in the vicinity, as the possibilities of their being either belated stragglers from the south, or early returning birds that accomplished their breeding in the far north, are remote'. However, Hemmingsen & Guidal (1968) recorded Dunlin at Beidaihe on seven dates in July noting ‘More or less dark spotting on underparts, of which some may be remnants of the black patch of adults, some the spotting of young in autumn, was seen in July…'.

Subsequent Chinese publications have made no mention of Dunlin breeding in Shantung, or elsewhere in China (Cheng 1987, Sai 2013, 2017, Xiang-Yu et al. 2009, Zhang & Zhang 2018), however Zheng (2017) noted the species as ‘occasional breeders (?)’, apparently based on Jones (1911) and mention of LeFevre's specimen in Meyer de Schauensee (1984).

The only other record of Dunlin breeding far south of the normal range is that of Chapman & Buck (1893: 73), who reported ‘discovering the Dunlin (Tringa alpina) nesting at a point over a thousand miles south of any previous record of its breeding range' in southern Spain, but proffered no further details. This record is referred to by Greenwood (1980); a clutch of four eggs collected on 24 April 1872 at Jerez de la Frontera, Spain, which he noted ‘is in the Seebohm collection at the British Museum (Natural History) … and was recorded by Seebohm (1888)'. However, Seebohm (1887) referred to ‘an [emphasis added] egg in my collection out of a clutch of four from which the bird was shot by Mr. Abel Chapman in the marshes of the Guadalquivir [Spain]'. Dresser (1871–81) also mentioned ‘an [emphasis added] egg from a clutch of four’ in the collection of H. Saunders. It is unclear why there is a discrepancy in the number of eggs. Of the four eggs, currently in the Natural History Museum, Tring (NHMUK 1901.1.1.5002–05) collection, one is labelled: ‘Tring (sic) variabilis nr Jerez, Spain 24 April 72 4 eggs. bird shot'.

Tsingtao is at c.36o06'N, whereas the Guadaquavil marshes, Spain, are at c.37o86'N. The southernmost breeding population of Dunlin in Europe is at c.50oN (Holloway 1996, Clark & Gromadzka 1997, Balmer et al. 2013, Calladine 2020), with occasional nesting attempts at about 47oN (Cramp & Simmons 1983, Clark & Gromadzka 1997). In the Russian Far East, the southernmost breeding populations are of actites in northern Sakhalin (c.53oN) and kistchinckii in southern Kamchatka (c.51oN) (Lappo et al. 2012).

LeFevre (1895–1974) was a missionary of the United Brethren Church in China (1923–27). En route to the USA in June 1927 LeFevre visited Hong Kong where he collected a few bird specimens, but no shorebirds (LeFevre 1930); it is not known where these specimens were deposited; they are not at ANSP. In addition to birds, he also collected ants (Formicidae) in both Shandong and Hong Kong (Wheeler 1929, 1930).

Upon his return to the USA he transferred to Geneva Presbytery, New York state, and published a short account of birds in China (LeFevre 1929). He returned to China where he was Dean of Agriculture at Huping Agricultural School, Yuangling, Hunan, in 1941–43 (Anon. 1941, 1974), but there is no evidence that he collected birds during this period. Back in the USA he was professor of biology at Sampson College, Sampson, New York state, in 1946, then at Hopewell Presbyterian Church, York county, Pennsylvania (Anon. 2020).

It is notable that LeFevre did not draw attention to this record (see above) and there are no other particularly unusual or extreme records or specimens in his collection. As such, it seems very unlikely that the record is fraudulent. A labelling error is possible (Rasmussen & Prŷs-Jones 2003), but the label is similar to other LeFevre bird specimens in ANSP (Fig. 1).

It may not be possible to determine the validity of the claimed 1927 Tsingtao breeding record definitively, but what does appear certain is that Dunlin does not currently breed in China.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Qing Quan Bai for information about oversummering Dunlin in the northern Yellow Sea; Richard Lewthwaite for assistance with historical literature; and Dale Erskine and Stacy Goodman for information about the Lebanon Valley College collection. Douglas G. D. Russell, Natural History Museum, Tring, UK, very kindly provided information regarding the Chapman eggs, as well as photographs. We thank Robert Prŷs-Jones and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments that improved the manuscript.

References:

1.

Anon. 1941. Family of missionary to live in Paxtonia. The Evening News (Harrisburg, Pennsylvania), 31 January 1941: 9.  https://www.newspapers.com/clip/1401789/the-evening-news/(accessed 21 August 2020). Google Scholar

2.

Anon. 1974. Rev. LeFevre, former China missionary, dies. York Daily Record (York, Pennsylvania) 29 June 1974: 13.  https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/81542783/(accessed 21 August 2020). Google Scholar

3.

Anon. 2020. Archives of the Susquehana Conference of the United Methodist Church.  https://www.lycoming.edu/umarch/ub_pastors/l.htm(accessed 21 August 2020). Google Scholar

4.

Balmer, D. E., Gillings, S., Caffrey, B. J., Swann, R. L., Downie, I. S. & Fuller, R. J. 2013. Bird atlas 2007–11: the breeding and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland. BTO Books, Thetford. Google Scholar

5.

Caldwell, H. R. & Caldwell, J. C. 1931. South China birds. Hester May Vanderburgh, Shanghai. Google Scholar

6.

Calladine, J. 2020. Calidris alpina Dunlin. P. 324 in Keller, V., Herrando, S., Voříšek, P., Franch, M., Kipson, M., Milanesi, P., Martí, D., Anton, M., Klvaňová, A., Kalyakin, M. V., Bauer, H.-G. & Foppen, R. P. B. (eds.) European breeding bird atlas 2: distribution, abundance and change. European Bird Census Council & Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

7.

Chapman, A. & Buck, W. J. 1893. Wild Spain (España agreste) records of sport with rifle, rod and gun, natural history and exploration. Gurney & Jackson, London. Google Scholar

8.

Cheng, T.-H. 1964. China's economic fauna: birds. US Dept. of Commerce, Washington DC. Google Scholar

9.

Cheng, T.-H. 1987. A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Science Press, Beijing. Google Scholar

10.

Clark, N. & Gromadzka, J. 1997. Dunlin. Pp. 280–281 in Hagemeijer, W. J. M. & Blair, M. J. (eds.) The EBCC atlas of European breeding birds: their distribution and abundance. T. & A. D. Poyser, London. Google Scholar

11.

Cramp, S. & Simmons, K. E. L. (eds.) 1983. The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol. 3. Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar

12.

Dresser, H. 1871–81. A history of the birds of Europe, 8 vols. Privately published, London. Google Scholar

13.

van Gils, J., Wiersma, P. & Boesman, P. 2020. Dunlin (Calidris alpina). In del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D. A. & de Juana, E. (eds.) Handbook of the birds of the world Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.  https://www.hbw.com/node/53938(accessed 3 February 2020). Google Scholar

14.

Greenwood, J. G. 1980. Dunlin Calidris alpina breeding in China. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 100: 172. Google Scholar

15.

Guo, F. Y., Ma, Y., Zhang, K. J., Han, L. & Guo, L. N. 2018. The climate change in Qingdao during 1899–2015 and its response to global warming. J. Geosci. & Environ. Protection 6: 58–70. Google Scholar

16.

Heldt, R. 1966. Zur Brutbiologie des Alpenstrandläufers, Calidris alpina schinzii. Corax 1: 173–188. Google Scholar

17.

Hemmingsen, A. M. & Guildal, J. A. 1968. Observations on birds of northeastern China especially the migration at Pei-Tai-Ho beach. II. Special part. Spolia Zool. Mus. Hauniensis 28: 1–326. Google Scholar

18.

Holloway, S. 1996. The historical atlas of breeding birds in Britain and Ireland: 1875–1900. T. & A. D. Poyser, London. Google Scholar

19.

Jones, K. H. 1911. On some birds observed in the vicinity of Wei Hai Wei, north-east China. Ibis 53: 657–695. Google Scholar

20.

Kannan, V. & Pandiyan, J. 2012. Shorebirds (Charadriidae) of Pulicat Lake, India with special reference to conservation. World J. Zool. 7: 178–191. Google Scholar

21.

Lappo, E. G., Tomkovich, P. P. & Syroechkovskiy, E. E. 2012. Atlas of breeding waders in the Russian Arctic. UF Ofsetnaya Pechat, Moscow. Google Scholar

22.

LaTouche, J. D. 1931–34. A handbook of the birds of eastern China. Taylor & Francis, London. Google Scholar

23.

LeFevre, R. H. 1929. Birds of China. Auk 46: 494–501. Google Scholar

24.

LeFevre, R. H. 1930. Summer birds of Hong Kong. Lingnan Sci. J. 9: 1–8. Google Scholar

25.

LeFevre, R. H. 1962. The birds of northern Shantung Province, China. Privately published. Google Scholar

26.

Meltofte, H., Piersma, T., Boyd, H., McCaffery, B., Ganyter, B., Golovnyuk, V. V., Graham, K., Gratto-Trevor, C. L., Morrison, R. I. G., Nol, E., Rösner, H.-U., Schamel, D., Schekkerman, H., Soloviev, M. Y., Tomkovich, P. S., Tracy, D. M., Tulp, I. & Wennerberg, L. 2007. Effects of climate variation on the breeding ecology of Arctic shorebirds. Medd. Grønland Biosci. 59. Danish Polar Center, Copenhagen. Google Scholar

27.

Meyer de Schauensee, R. 1984. The birds of China. Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar

28.

Naves, L. C., Keating, J. M., Tibbitts, T. L. & Ruthrauf, D. R. 2019. Shorebird subsistence harvest and indigenous knowledge in Alaska: informing harvest management and engaging users in shorebird conservation. Condor 121: https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duz023Google Scholar

29.

Rasmussen, P. C. & Prŷs-Jones, R. P. 2003. History vs mystery: the reliability of museum specimen data. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 123A: 66–94. Google Scholar

30.

Sai, D. J. 2013. A checklist and distribution of the birds of Shandong. Science Press, Beijing. Google Scholar

31.

Sai, D. J. 2017. [The avifauna of Shandong, China]. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese.) Google Scholar

32.

Seebohm, H. 1887 [1888]. The geographical distribution of the family Charadriidae, or the plovers, sandpipers, snipes and their allies. Henry Sotheran, London. Google Scholar

33.

Shaw, T. H. 1938. The avifauna of Tsingtao and neighbouring districts. Bull. Fan Mem. Inst, Biol., Zool. Ser. 8: 133–222. Google Scholar

34.

Soikelli, M. 1967. Breeding cycle and population dynamics in the Dunlin (Calidris alpina). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 4: 158–198. Google Scholar

35.

Sowerby, A. de C. 1923. The naturalist in Manchuria, vol. 3. Tienstin Press, Tientsin. Google Scholar

36.

Swinhoe, R. 1875. Ornithological notes made at Chefoo (province of Shantung, north China). Ibis 17: 114–140. Google Scholar

37.

Tomkovich, P. S. 1998. Breeding schedule and primary moult in Dunlins Calidris alpina of the Far East. Wader Study Group Bull. 85: 29–34. Google Scholar

38.

Warnock, N. D. & Gill, R.E. 2020. Dunlin (Calidris alpina), version 1.0. In Billerman, S. M. (ed.) Birds of the world. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.dunlin.01(accessed 11 March 2020). Google Scholar

39.

Wheeler, W. M. 1929. Some ants from China and Manchuria. Amer. Mus. Novit. 361: 1–11. Google Scholar

40.

Wheeler, W. M. 1930. A list of the known Chinese ants. Peking Nat. Hist. Bull. 5: 53–81. Google Scholar

41.

Wilder, G. D. & Hubbard, H. W. 1924. List of the birds of Chihli Province. J. North China Branch Roy. Asia. Soc. 55: 156–239. Google Scholar

42.

Witherby, H. F., Jourdain, F. C. R., Ticehurst, N. F. & Tucker, B. W. 1940. The handbook of British birds, vol. 4. H. F. & G. Witherby, London. Google Scholar

43.

Xiang-Yu, J., Ma, Z., Yang, L. & Chen, J. 2009. Progress in intraspecific taxonomy of Dunlin Calidris alpina. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 34: 546–553. Google Scholar

44.

Zhang, L. & Zhang, M. 2018. A photographic guide to the birds of China, vol. 2. Straits Publishing & Distributing Group, Fuzhou. Google Scholar

45.

Zheng, G. M. 2017. A checklist on the classification and distribution of the birds of China. Third edn. Science Press, Beijing. Google Scholar
© 2021 The Authors; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
David S. Melville, Qing Chang, Wei Liu, and Nathan H. Rice "Breeding records of Dunlin Calidris alpina in China," Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 141(2), 121-126, (15 June 2021). https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v141i2.2021.a2
Received: 30 June 2020; Published: 15 June 2021
Back to Top