Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
6 September 2022 The taxonomic status of Crimson-crested Turaco Menelikornis (leucotis) donaldsoni
Kai Gedeon, Olaf Jahn, Till Töpfer
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

White-cheeked Turaco Menelikornis (leucotis) leucotis and Crimson-crested Turaco M. (l.) donaldsoni have long been treated as conspecific. Because of the lack of data concerning their distribution and areas of potential geographical overlap, they have been considered to be parapatric at most. In 2019 and 2021, we conducted a field study that produced nearly 40 records of the two taxa. In the study area, which stretched 120 km north to south from the upper Shabelle Valley via the Oda and Bale Mts. to Harenna Forest, both leucotis and donaldsoni occurred. The presence of both taxa was recorded across c.50 km west to east, which indicates an area of range overlap of about 6,000 km2. Sympatry between leucotis and donaldsoni, together with clear differences in morphology (mainly crest colour) as well as molecular evidence, strongly support treating them as different species.

Originally three turaco species were described from the Horn of Africa. Rüppell (1835) gave the widespread White-cheeked Turaco the scientific name Corythaix leucotis. Six decades later, Sharpe (1895) described Turacus donaldsoni, for which the vernacular name Crimson-crested Turaco is suggested (see below). Finally, the description of Ruspoli's Turaco by Salvadori (1896) followed, as Turacus ruspolii. Subsequent taxonomic revisions relegated donaldsoni to a subspecies of White-cheeked Turaco and until recently the following classification has been in widespread use: Tauraco l. leucotis, T. l. donaldsoni and T. ruspolii. However, a recent study by Perktaş et al. (2020) revealed that donaldsoni is as divergent genetically from leucotis as ruspolii is, and proposed that all three be treated at species level. Furthermore, the same authors demonstrated that all turacos in the Horn of Africa do not belong to the genus Tauraco. Rather, they form a well-separated grouping, for which the genus-group name Menelikornis was introduced by Boetticher (1947, 1955). Whereas the generic classification has since been adopted in the IOC world bird list (Gill et al. 2021), specific status for donaldsoni has not. The following aspects were probably decisive: (a) the ranges of leucotis and donaldsoni were assumed not to overlap, and (b) differences in plumage coloration between leucotis and donaldsoni were considered minor and functionally insignificant. Here, we provide arguments to counter these assumptions and support specific status for M. donaldsoni.

Study area and Methods

Whilst leucotis is widespread in Ethiopia, as well as in parts of Eritrea and South Sudan, the range of donaldsoni is limited to a relatively small area of Ethiopia east of the Rift Valley, from the highlands around Harar, across the Chercher Mts. to the Arsi and Bale ranges. According to Ash & Atkins (2009), donaldsoni occurs alongside leucotis in the Bale Mts. Other authors have questioned this and called for clarification as to whether the two occur in sympatry or are parapatric in this region (Turner & Boesman 2020). KG & TT therefore visited the area briefly in May 2019 and KG again on 5–12 May 2021 for a targeted search and survey. Of a total of 38 georeferenced turaco records, 18 involve our own observations and 18 result from interviews with local residents. We used additional data, dating back to 2007, provided by V. Sthamer and L. Reissland. Local people were familiar with both turacos (which they call ‘Sokurru’) and could clearly identify the main difference between them (bluish vs. reddish crests). In Harenna Forest a man named Ahmed Aman asked us even before we interviewed him if we knew that there were two turacos with different crest colours. Abdulkadir Mohammed, a local bird guide who lives in a small coffee-farming village in southern Harenna Forest, was also familiar with both taxa and confirmed their occurrence in the vicinity of his settlement.

Voice playback, with recordings of leucotis taken from  www.xeno-canto.org, was used to track down turacos, which are often silent and inconspicuous, except in the breeding season and during territorial disputes. For data collection in the field, we used the Android mapping app MultibaseCS after we had integrated the bird species list for Ethiopia. Furthermore, photographs and sound-recordings were made.

Results

In the study area, which encompasses large parts of the hitherto known range of donaldsoni, stretches c.120 km north to south from the upper Shabelle Valley via the Oda and Bale Mts. to Harenna Forest, both leucotis and donaldsoni were found. There is c.50 km between the western- and easternmost points of mixed occurrences, which results in an area of approximately 6,000 km2 of range overlap (Fig. 1). The data on which Fig. 1 is based are compiled in Table 1.

We thus confirm, as reported by Ash & Atkins (2009), sympatry of leucotis and donaldsoni. Within the region of overlap, the relative frequency of the two taxa varies. In the Oda Mts. local residents reported that donaldsoni is much more common. On the north slope of the Bale Massif (Dinsho, Goba), the relationship is reversed and leucotis is dominant (pers. obs.). This also applies to Harenna Forest further south, where leucotis is clearly in the majority and donaldsoni is considered rare (pers. obs.). It is impossible to make any inferences regarding seasonal variation in their occurrence as the data are inadequate. Such variation was sometimes affirmed by respondents but without any indication of timings.

Our records involved 79 individuals at 18 locations, with 1–15 birds per observation. The max. figure refers to a large group of donaldsoni seen on 7 June 2021 near Agarfa (07°17′N, 39°46′E). The birds' reaction to playback songs was often not very pronounced. It was strongest in apparently territorial breeding pairs (leucotis in May 2021 near Dinsho) and very weak in foraging groups. Additionally, we managed to collect only a few poor-quality sound-recordings of leucotis and donaldsoni in the field, but preliminary analyses revealed no clear differences between them in song structure, frequency range and peak frequency.

We have always encountered leucotis and donaldsoni separately, never in mixed flocks. However, a single donaldsoni was observed with several leucotis at Rira (06°46′N, 39°43′E) around 2007 (V. Sthamer in litt. 2021). To our knowledge, this is the only observation of a mixed group to date. Among the birds we observed there was no evidence of hybrids between leucotis and donaldsoni. Instead, the coloration of the crest and hindcrown was either dark blue (leucotis) or crimson (donaldsoni), with no intermediate tones discernible. The colour really becomes obvious when the crown feathers are raised, expressing arousal during courtship or when encountering conspecifics, competitors or predators (Fig. 2).

We found no evidence of elevational segregation between leucotis and donaldsoni. Difference between the mean elevations of the records was insignificant: 2,470 m (n = 33) for leucotis + both, and 2,599 m (n = 22) for donaldsoni + both.

Although we have not studied habitat use and availability, ‘Oda’ means ‘tree’ in the Oromia language, which suggests that the Oda Mts. between the Shabelle River and Bale Mts. were once well forested. These forests have now disappeared, other than a few remnants. Only in these small, often very sparse patches was donaldsoni found. Older farmers repeatedly noted that turacos were common until 20–30 years ago but have since disappeared in many places due to tree clearance. Outside mountain ranges, locals also reported observations of donaldsoni in riverine woodland along the Shabelle and its tributaries.

Figure 1.

Sightings of White-cheeked Turaco Menelikornis (l.) leucotis (white dots) and Crimson-crested Turaco M. (l.) donaldsoni (black dots) plus interview data indicating the sympatric occurrence of both taxa (red stars). Map data © 2022 Google Image Landsat / Copernicus.

img-z3-1_343.jpg

TABLE 1

Records of White-cheeked Turaco Menelikornis (l.) leucotis and Crimson-crested Turaco Menelikornis (l.) donaldsoni shown in Fig. 1.

img-z3-4_343.gif

Continued

img-z4-1_343.gif

Discussion

Parapatric vs. sympatric distribution.—In his comprehensive review of the Musophagidae, Moreau (1958) lamented that the ranges of leucotis and donaldsoni had been seriously misrepresented by previous authors, e.g. Friedmann (1930). For the first time, Moreau provided a detailed map with all records available until then and identified a gap of c.80 km (50 miles) between their assumed ranges. However, he cautiously remarked ‘as the intervening country seems to be zoologically unexplored and not unsuitable for the species it is open to speculation whether the black-crested birds and the red-crested meet or intergrade’. Erard & Prévost (1971) emphasised that ‘information from the zone of contact between the two subspecies is still poor, with precise data...lacking’. Brosset & Fry (1988) ignored these considerations and noted that donaldsoni is parapatric with leucotis. It was not until Ash & Atkins (2009) pointed out that in the Bale Mts. donaldsoni ‘is found alongside nominate leucotis supporting the view for its specific separation’. Unfortunately, they gave no further details, prompting del Hoyo & Collar (2014) to observe that ‘clarification is necessary as to whether the two co-occur or are parapatric in Bale Mts.’. In the absence of further data, parapatry was still assumed, most recently by Perktaş et al. (2020). However, our findings show that the ranges of leucotis and donaldsoni overlap to a considerable extent. Presumably the area of sympatry is even larger than 6,000 km2, as the north-west part of the Bale Mts. (south of Adaba) could not be visited for security reasons, and only a short visit was possible in the north-east (south of Meliyu). In these areas, sympatry of leucotis and donaldsoni is also quite possible, and further research is clearly necessary. In the area we surveyed and based on the data available, there is no evidence of elevational parapatry (see Table 1).

Turacos are generally sedentary except occasional longer forays in search of food (Turner 1997). The max. distance of such movements in ruspolii is reported to be a few kilometres (Borghesio 1997). Therefore, co-occurrence of leucotis and donaldsoni across 120 km or more is unlikely to be attributable to seasonal movements. Another argument in favour of a zone of co-occurrence, instead of a hybrid zone, is that there is no evidence to date of hybridisation between leucotis and donaldsoni. This may not be surprising, for although the Bale Mts. are regularly visited by birdwatchers, hybrids would certainly be difficult to identify: differences would mainly be expected in crest colour, ranging between crimson and dark blue, and doubtless a challenge to see in the field. In contrast, hybrids between leucotis and ruspolii have been repeatedly identified and a high, and possibly increasing, degree of hybridisation has been assumed (Lernould & Seitre 2002, Borghesio et al. 2004a,b). Hybrids between leucotis and donaldsoni are therefore to be expected. Nonetheless, sympatry of leucotis and donaldsoni presented here, together with the clear differentiation in molecular characteristics (Fst 0.67; Perktaş et al. 2020), strongly support the view that they should be treated as species.

Morphological and ecological differentiation.—As shown in Fig. 2, the colour of the erect crest in donaldsoni is very conspicuous and differs significantly from the dark blue of leucotis (Fig. 4). When relaxed, this difference is much less conspicuous and therefore often under-estimated (Fig. 3). This applies to observations in the field, but even more so in museum collections. It is therefore unsurprising that handbooks and field guides depict the differences between leucotis and donaldsoni as marginal (e.g. Fry et al. 1988, del Hoyo et al. 1997, Redman et al. 2011). Displaying otherwise concealed plumage features apparently plays an important role in turacos, both in threat gestures (Turner 1997: 488, photo) and courtship (bowing and nodding, thereby revealing the crown; Peat 2017). It is known that birds use plumage and vocal characters to advertise their reproductive compatibility, but there are no published studies of this in leucotis. Our own sound-recordings are unfortunately unsuitable for proper analysis. However, it may be worthwhile to explore possible differences in the vocal structure when high-quality recordings from the contact zone become available.

Figure 2.

Crimson-crested Turaco Menelikornis (l.) donaldsoni, near Agarfa, June 2019; a bird obviously in a state of intense arousal with the bright crimson crest very striking (Kai Gedeon)

img-z6-1_343.jpg

Figure 3.

Crimson-crested Turaco Menelikornis (l.) donaldsoni, near Agarfa, May 2021; usually the crest coloration is less conspicuous when it is only slightly erected or not at all, as here (Kai Gedeon)

img-z6-3_343.jpg

Figure 4.

White-cheeked Turaco Menelikornis (l.) leucotis, Wondo Genet, east slope of the Rift Valley; note differences in size of white cheek patches and mantle colour compared to donaldsoni in Fig. 2 (© Torsten Pröhl)

img-z7-1_343.jpg

Lernould & Seitre (2004) suggested that reproductive isolation between sympatric Musophaginae species is achieved by ecological barriers rather than via genetic or behavioural ones, because they possess similar social behaviours and easily hybridise in captivity. On the other hand, there are reports of aggressive behaviour between species as closely related as leucotis and ruspolii where they meet in the wild (Brosset & Fry 1988), and in this context plumage colour differences may play a more important role than suspected by Lernould & Seitre (2004). Whilst habitat differences have been reported in these species (Daka 2011), such studies are lacking for leucotis and donaldsoni. Although the latter occurs in relatively open habitats in the east of its range around Sheik Husein, it also inhabits densely wooded areas, such as Din-Din (pers. obs.). Erlanger (1905), who travelled around Harar and areas south-west of there prior to extensive forest clearance, described donaldsoni as resident in primeval forest with ‘almost impenetrable undergrowth’ and ‘ancient giant trees’. This description also matches Harenna Forest today where leucotis dominates. We suggest that possible differences in habitat preferences between leucotis, donaldsoni and ruspolii be subject to detailed investigation and that the role of other reproductive barriers, such as plumage colour and behaviour, should not be excluded as alternative explanations.

Figure 5.

Ruspoli's Turaco Menelikornis ruspolii, near Negele, south-east Ethiopia (© Torsten Pröhl)

img-z8-1_343.jpg

Figure 6.

Left White-cheeked Turaco Menelikornis (l.) leucotis at Yergalem, south of Awasa, and right Crimson-crested Turaco M. (l.) donaldsoni at Goro Gutu, west of Harar; here only minor differences in the size of the cheek patches and peri-ocular wattles are apparent (© Volker Sthamer)

img-z8-3_343.jpg

Erard & Prévost (1971) pointed out that leucotis populations (including donaldsoni) from different areas of Ethiopia differ in some colour characteristics. They summarised their study of specimens as follows: ‘The material from Eritrea, Begember-Gojjam, Shoa, Kaffa and the Sudan has the mantle and wing-coverts blue in colour, with large conspicuous white patches on the sides of the neck, whereas that from Sidamo and Arussi is correspondingly green rather than blue, with the neck-patches smaller.’ It is important to note that Sidamo and Arussi form part of the zone where leucotis and donaldsoni overlap. These colour differences within leucotis also may be relevant for separating donaldsoni. There are discernible differences between the individuals in Figs. 23 (donaldsoni) and Fig. 4 (leucotis) in mantle colour and cheek patch size. A well-developed peri-ocular wattle is also visible in donaldsoni, which is less conspicuous in leucotis and in M. ruspolii (Fig. 5). However, we cannot assess if this character is potentially related to different excitement levels in the birds. Fig. 6 shows that the differences between leucotis and donaldsoni can be much less noticeable (other than crest coloration). Further research is needed to determine if there are consistent differences in these characters or just extensive individual variation. It has been shown that UV signatures, although invisible to the human eye, may separate sibling bird species (e.g. Bleiweiss 2004). To date, UV signals have been found only in the red patches in the primaries and secondaries, but not in the body plumage, of all species of Turaco as then constituted (Mullen & Pohland 2008). However, potential differences in UV reflection of, e.g., crest colour of donaldsoni and leucotis remain untested.

Conservation.—Whilst the range of leucotis covers large parts of Ethiopia and also parts of Eritrea and Sudan, the occurrence of donaldsoni is endemic to a comparatively small area of north-east Ethiopia, from Harar to the Arsi and Bale Mts. Forests in this montane region have largely disappeared today, except a few larger remnants (e.g. Din-Din, Kuni-Mukdar) and some widely scattered ‘islands’. The devastation continues in parts of the range of donaldsoni, as we witnessed in 2019 and 2021 in the Oda Mts., south of the Shabelle River, in the northern Bale Massif (Fig. 7a,b). There is a lack of information on the distribution and abundance of donaldsoni where it persists, so that at present no reliable statements can be made concerning its IUCN threat status. Non-timber crops, logging, plantations and livestock farming have been listed among threats to M. ruspolii, which is currently classified as Vulnerable (BirdLife International 2022). The same threats are likely to affect donaldsoni and a proper assessment is therefore urgently required.

Remarks on English names.—Arthur Donaldson Smith (1866–1939) was an American traveller and big-game hunter who was active in Abyssinia and Somaliland in the late 19th century (Beolens et al. 2014). He collected the type of donaldsoni, which Sharpe (1895) named in his honour. Current English names also refer to him, for example in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database ( www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Whilst Smith's contribution to the biological exploration of the Horn of Africa is not in question, his pronounced imperialist worldview cannot be ignored. In his book (Smith 1897), he stated that England is ‘left as free as France or Russia or any other nation to turn her attention to the acquisition of the vast and important territory in question’, i.e. the entire area between the Somali coast and the Nile. The legitimacy of this claim was shared by many of his contemporaries, but neither then or now have the actions that resulted been just or morally acceptable. Another passage in Smith (1897) is no less thought-provoking. With obvious satisfaction he describes ‘the battle’ with the Borana, armed only with spears, in what is now southern Ethiopia: ‘The firing was hot, and down went warriors, one on top of another. They held up their shields to protect themselves, and thus offered splendid marks for the rifles’. In this context, a vernacular honorific appears inappropriate. Moreover, given the brilliant colour of the erect crest shown in Fig. 2, the name Maroon-crested Turaco used by del Hoyo & Collar (2014) seems less appropriate than Crimson-crested Turaco, which we here propose for donaldsoni.

Figure 7

a (above). Remnants of Podocarpus forest in the Oda Mts., which are heavily cultivated by smallholders. Crimson-crested Turaco Menelikornis (l.) donaldsoni survives here, despite the advanced state of habitat degradation. Figure 7b (below). Another former forest in an irreversibly devastated state, May 2021 (Kai Gedeon)

img-z10-1_343.jpg

Acknowledgements

We thank everyone who supported this study. As has so often been true, Chemere Zewdie was on hand to offer advice and assistance. Agaju Derebew took care of our logistics and Kumlachew Mesfin steered us safely across rough terrain. In the Bale Mts. we relied on the experience and local knowledge of Jamal Kassim and Abdulkadir Mohammed. Volker Sthamer, Lutz Reissland and Torsten Pröhl provided records and photographs of turacos from their earlier field work. Marcel Seyring created the map. Nigel Collar, Nigel Redman, Lincoln Fishpool and Guy Kirwan provided extensive and very helpful comments on a first version of this paper. Our special thanks go to them.

References:

1.

Ash, J. S. & Atkins, J. 2009. Birds of Ethiopia and Eritrea: an atlas of distribution. Christopher Helm, London. Google Scholar

2.

Beolens, B., Watkins, M. & Grayson, M. 2014. The eponym dictionary of birds. Bloomsbury, London. Google Scholar

3.

BirdLife International. 2022. IUCN Red List for birds.  http://www.birdlife.org (accessed 19 January 2022). Google Scholar

4.

Bleiweiss, R. 2004. Ultraviolet plumage reflectance distinguishes sibling bird species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 10: 16561–16564. Google Scholar

5.

Boetticher, H. 1947. Die systematische Gliederung der Vogelgattung Tauraco. Senckenbergiana 28(3): 1–6. Google Scholar

6.

Boetticher, H. 1955. Die Lärmvögel, Turakos und Pisangfresser (Musophagidae) . Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg Lutherstadt. Google Scholar

7.

Borghesio, L. 1997. Observations on the ecology of Tauraco ruspolii and T. leucotis in southern Ethiopia. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 117: 11–18. Google Scholar

8.

Borghesio, L., Giannetti, F., Ndang'ang'a, K. & Shimelis, A. 2004a. The present conservation status of Juniperus forests in the South Ethiopian Endemic Bird Area. Afr. J. Ecol. 42: 137–143. Google Scholar

9.

Borghesio, L., Giannetti, F., Ndang'ang'a, K., Shimelis, A., Borghesio, A., Rizzo, D. & Fufa, K. 2004b. A reassessment of the conservation status of Prince Ruspoli's Turaco Tauraco ruspolii. Bull. Afr. Bird Cl. 11: 105–111. Google Scholar

10.

Brosset, A. & Fry, C. H. 1988. Order Musophagiformes. Pp. 26–57 in Fry, C. H., Keith, S. & Urban, E. K. (eds.) The birds of Africa , vol. 3. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

11.

Daka, A. 2011. Prince Ruspoli's Turaco and the White-cheeked Turaco with their hybrid and their habitat association in Guji zone, southern Ethiopia. M.Sc. thesis. Addis Ababa Univ. Google Scholar

12.

Erard, C. & Prévost, J. 1971. Notes on some Ethiopian birds. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 91: 21–25. Google Scholar

13.

Erlanger, C. 1905. Forschungsreise durch Süd-Schoa, Galla und die Somali-Länder. Beiträge zur Vogelfauna Nordostafrikas mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Zoogeographie. Gesellschaft für Erdkunde, Berlin. Google Scholar

14.

Friedmann, H. 1930. Birds collected by the Childs Frick Expedition to Ethiopia and Kenya Colony. Part 1. Non-passerines. US Natl. Mus. Bull. 153. Google Scholar

15.

Fry, C. H., Keith, S. & Urban, E. K. (eds.) 1988. The birds of Africa, vol. 3. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

16.

Gill, F., Donsker, D. & Rasmussen, P. (eds.) 2021. IOC world bird list (v11.2).  10.14344/IOC.ML.11.2Google Scholar

17.

del Hoyo, J. & Collar, N. J. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International illustrated checklist of the birds of the world, vol. 1. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

18.

del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (eds.) 1997. Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 4. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

19.

Lernould, J.-M. & Seitre, R. 2002. Observation d'hybrides naturels entre le touraco à joues blanches Tauraco leucotis et le touraco du Prince Ruspoli Tauraco ruspolii. Alauda 70: 247–251. Google Scholar

20.

Lernould, J.-M. & Seitre, R. 2004. Does hybridisation with White-cheeked Turaco Tauraco leucotis represent a threat for Prince Ruspoli's Turaco T. ruspolii? Bull. Afr. Bird Cl. 11: 112–116. Google Scholar

21.

Moreau, R. E. 1958. Some aspects of the Musophagidae. Ibis 100: 67–112, 238–270. Google Scholar

22.

Mullen, P. & Pohland, R. 2008: Studies on UV reflection in feathers of some 1000 bird species: are UV peaks in feathers correlated with violet-sensitive and ultraviolet-sensitive cones? Ibis 150: 59–68. Google Scholar

23.

Peat, L. 2017. EAZA turaco best practice guidelines. Cotswold Wildlife Park. Google Scholar

24.

Perktaş, U., Groth, J. G. & Barrowclough, G. F. 2020. Phylogeography, species limits, phylogeny, and classification of the turacos (Aves: Musophagidae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Amer. Mus. Novit. 3934: 1–61. Google Scholar

25.

Redman, N., Stevenson, T. & Fanshawe, J. 2011. Birds of the Horn of Africa. Second edn. Christopher Helm, London. Google Scholar

26.

Rüppell, E. 1835. Neue Wirbelthiere zu der Fauna von Abyssinien gehörig . Vögel . Siegmund Schmerber, Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar

27.

Salvadori, T. 1896. Uccelli raccolti da Don Eugenio Dei Principi Ruspoli durante l'ultimo suo viaggio nelle regioni dei Somali e dei Galla. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Genova (2)36: 43–46. Google Scholar

28.

Sharpe, R. B. 1895. [ Turacus donaldsoni, sp. n.]. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 4: 32. Google Scholar

29.

Smith, A. D. 1897. Through unknown African countries, the first expedition from Somaliland to Lake Lamu. Edward Arnold, London. Google Scholar

30.

Turner, D. A. 1997. Musophagidae (turacos). Pp. 480–506 in del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (eds.) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 4. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

31.

Turner, D. A. & Boesman, P. F. D. 2020. White-cheeked Turaco (Tauraco leucotis), version 1.0. In del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D. A. & de Juana, E. (eds.) Birds of the world. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.whctur1.01Google Scholar
© 2022 The Authors;
Kai Gedeon, Olaf Jahn, and Till Töpfer "The taxonomic status of Crimson-crested Turaco Menelikornis (leucotis) donaldsoni," Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 142(3), 343-353, (6 September 2022). https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v142i3.2022.a7
Received: 17 January 2022; Published: 6 September 2022
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


Share
SHARE
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top