Photographs of the webs of approximately 113 species in 52 genera show that the web architecture of linyphioid spiders (Linyphiidae and Pimoidae) present many variations on a single basic pattern. Nearly all species built webs with a more or less horizontal, continuous sheet with an open space just below the sheet. However, the details in the designs showed great diversity; we recognized >50 web traits, including positions relative to the ground or large objects; sheet shapes and orientations; secondary sheets; “slime” on the sheet; patterns and densities of lines in sheets; visible droplets on sticky lines; upward and downward directed dimples in the sheet with tensor lines; primary and secondary frame lines; retreats; and the presence, location, and designs of associated tangles. This survey probably substantially underestimates both intraspecific and intrageneric diversity of web forms. Intrageneric comparisons in just over 20 genera documented varying degrees of intrageneric variation; some genera show striking differences. Several web designs were widely distributed: sheets with dense tangles above commonly had arrays of lines attached to the sheet's upper surface; downward dimples in sheets commonly occurred at sites where the sheet curved upward, but upward-directed dimples were rare and small; and sheets built next to the surface of the ground almost always lacked extensive tangles above them. New web patterns not previously reported for linyphiid webs include: sandwich webs (pairs of closely spaced, otherwise naked sheets); extensive vertical sheets next to tree trunks; tubular retreats at the edges of the sheet where the spider rests; trough-like sheets just above the upper surface of a curled leaf; sizeable, apparently sticky droplets densely covering many lines that were apparently placed in pairs in the sheet; long sheet lines that converge at one corner; runways to a sheltered site where the spider waits beyond the sheet's edge; and apparent skeleton lines in the sheet (probably from early stages of construction). Patterns of lines within the sheet may reflect patterns of movement during sheet construction behavior. We propose that some webs on the substrate function to extend the spider's sensory field rather than detain prey and that some tangles below and perhaps some above the sheet may function to defend the spider from enemies. A suite of linyphiid traits, including leg, chelicera, and spinneret morphology; details of web design, such as numerous small upward-directed dimples in dome-shaped sheets but fewer, large downward-directed dimples in cup-shaped sheets; and attack behavior, appears to function to increase the speed with which spiders attack prey. The functions of many architectural features remain obscure.