How to translate text using browser tools
27 September 2019 Meat and sensory quality of major muscles from Angus, Charolais, and Angus crossbred steers with high and low residual feed intake
Zhiqiang Jiu, Bimol C. Roy, Chamali Das, Wendy V. Wismer, Manuel Juárez, Carolyn Fitzsimmons, Changxi Li, Graham Plastow, Jennifer L. Aalhus, Heather L. Bruce
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Effects of residual feed intake (RFI) and genetic group on growth, carcass, and meat quality characteristics of bovine longissimus lumborum (LL), triceps brachii (TB), semimembranosus (SM), and gluteus medius (GM) muscles were investigated using 72 purebred Angus, purebred Charolais, and Angus crossbred steers (n = 24 per genetic group) classified as either high (inefficient) or low (efficient) RFI (n = 12 high and low RFI steers within genetic group). There was no RFI effect (P > 0.05) on growth, carcass, and meat quality measurements except high RFI steers had the highest dry matter intake (P < 0.05), and low RFI TB was rated as having reduced beef flavour intensity and sustained juiciness (P < 0.05). Purebred Angus and Charolais LL and GM had lower shear force values (P < 0.05) than Angus crossbreds and ageing reduced mean shear force values except in TB. For TB, SM, and GM, Angus crossbred steers had the highest mean beef flavour intensity scores, and Charolais SM and TB were less tender than those of Angus crossbred (P < 0.05). Overall, RFI did not influence most meat quality traits; therefore, low RFI animals may contribute to reducing feed costs or environmental impact without compromising meat quality and palatability.

© Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada 2020. Permission for reuse (free in most cases) can be obtained from RightsLink.
Zhiqiang Jiu, Bimol C. Roy, Chamali Das, Wendy V. Wismer, Manuel Juárez, Carolyn Fitzsimmons, Changxi Li, Graham Plastow, Jennifer L. Aalhus, and Heather L. Bruce "Meat and sensory quality of major muscles from Angus, Charolais, and Angus crossbred steers with high and low residual feed intake," Canadian Journal of Animal Science 100(1), 140-153, (27 September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0012
Received: 15 January 2019; Accepted: 22 July 2019; Published: 27 September 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE
14 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
cattle (beef)
efficiency (feed)
quality (meat)
residual feed intake
sensory
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top