Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
5 November 2021 The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 159. Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
Hafsa T. Ahmed, Ardath Francis, David R. Clements, Elyse Dyck, Natalie Ross, Mahesh K. Upadhyaya, Linda M. Hall, Sara L. Martin
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik, shepherd’s purse, is a cosmopolitan summer or winter annual weed species distributed throughout temperate and subtropical regions of the world and is considered one of the most common plants on earth. It is an opportunistic annual that colonizes newly disturbed, open or dry environments and is ubiquitous in cultivated lands in Canada. In annual crops in western Canada, C. bursa-pastoris has been among the 20 most abundant weeds since the first weed surveys in 1970. It is most easily distinguished by its small white four-petalled flowers and its heart-shaped seed-pods, but exhibits considerable variation in leaf shape and flowering time. It has been used for food and medicine by numerous cultures. Its golden-brown seeds are produced in large numbers predominantly through self-pollination and can form a substantial seed bank, with reported values ranging to several hundred thousand seeds m−2. While seeds usually disperse near the mother plant, long-distance dispersal by attaching to vehicles, people and other vectors may be facilitated by its mucilaginous coat. Capsella bursa-pastoris does not produce fertile hybrids with other species of economic or ecological significance. It is generally well controlled by soil-applied and foliar (post-emergence) herbicides although its presence in agricultural fields may result in substantial yield loss, as documented in cole crops in North America and grain crops in Europe. The species can host a wide range of insect, nematode, fungal, viral, and bacterial pests that may damage crop species.

1. .

Name

Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. — synonyms: Thlaspi bursa-pastoris L., Bursa bursa-pastoris (L.) Schull, Bursa pastoris (L.) Weber. Common names: shepherd’s purse (Darbyshire et al. 2000), case weed, common shepherd’s-purse, pepper plant, pick-pocket, pickpocket, pick-purse, witches’-pouches, toothwort, shovel-plant, shepherd’s bag, shepherd’s purse, shepherdspurse (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1973; Darbyshire 2003); bourse-à-pasteur, bourse-à-berger, boursette, capselle, capselle bourse-à-pasteur, corne de lion, tabouret, tabouret des champs, thlaspi, thlaspi bourse à pasteur (Royer and Dickinson 1999; Darbyshire 2003).

2. .

Description and Account of Variation

(a) .

Species description

Capsella bursa-pastoris is a small summer or winter annual herb. It has adapted to a wide range of environments and is also phenotypically plastic contributing to wide variation in size and life history traits. It has a dominant white taproot with few lateral fine roots (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1973; Aksoy et al. 1998; Defelice 2001). A solitary or several erect stems, simple or branched, grow from the same root, generally from 10–60 cm tall but occasionally as high as 90 cm (Fig 1A). It forms a basal rosette with the first leaves at the ground surface, consisting of petiolate oblong leaves that narrow to the stalk and are usually hairy, varying from almost entire to shallowly or deeply toothed, 3–15 cm long and 4 cm wide, but occasionally longer with rosette diameters occasionally exceeding 40 cm (Neuffer and Hurka 1986b). The stem leaves are smaller than the rosette leaves, stalkless, alternate one per node, are roughly linear entire to shallowly toothed to lanceolate on upper stem, basal leaves sagittate (arrow shaped), amplexicaul (leaf grasping stem) or auriclate (ear-shaped) and densely to sparsely covered with fine star-shaped hairs or sometimes hairless (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1973; Schultze-Motel 1986; Frankton and Mulligan 1987; Alex 1992; Stace 1997; Defelice 2001; Damgaard et al. 2008; Al-Shehbaz 2012). Flowers are small (2.5–8 mm across), initially in rounded clusters at the ends of stems and branches (Fig. 1B). Sepals are green or reddish (1.5–2 × 0.7–1 mm). Petals are white, rounded, and larger than the sepals, generally 2–4 × 1–1.5 mm (occasionally slightly narrower or wider, ranging to 5 mm). Stamens number six, with tetradynamous filaments (1–2 mm) and with a shorter style (< 0.8 mm). Flowers are present on a short, glabrous terminal raceme and pedicels, generally 0.5–1.5 cm long at maturity (Defelice 2001; Damgaard et al. 2008). Fruits (silicles) 2-valved, up to 3× as long as wide (4–10 × 3.4–8 mm), flattened at right angle to the stem, triangular to heart-shaped, with straight to slightly convex sides, base cuneate, apex emarginate or truncate, notched at the top, valves each with subparallel lateral veins, divided by a narrow septum (membranous partition) (Fig. 1C). Seeds numerous, up to about 32 per fruit, oblong, 0.8–1 mm long, orange-yellow to light brown, surface dull and punctured (Fig. 1C) (Schultze-Motel 1986; Frankton and Mulligan 1987; Hurka and Neuffer 1991; Alex 1992; Stace 1997; Al-Shehbaz 2012). Mucilage layer visible on seed surface when wetted (Swarbrick, 1971). Pollen grains are small (< 25 mm polar axis), isopolar, tricolpate, prolate spheroidal to prolate and are distinct from other genera in the Camelineae in having interruptions in the tectum that create the appearance of dimples on the pollen surface (Sagun and Auer 2017).

Fig. 1.

Mature Capsella bursa-pastoris plant (A), flower and developing seed pod stages (B), and open capsule and seed (C). Illustrations by Jessica Hsiung.

cjps-2021-0059f1.tif

(b) .

Distinguishing features

Capsella species are distinguished from other plants in the mustard family by their triangular or heart-shaped seed pods that have a narrow septum, or separating membrane, between the halves of the pod (Alex 1992). Refer to Hitchcock and Cronquist (1973) for a diagnostic key.

(c) .

Intraspecific variation

Capsella bursa-pastoris has been observed to have high intraspecific genetic, morphological, and phenological variability (Hurka and Neuffer 1991; Neuffer and Eschner 1995; Hurka and Neuffer 1997; Neuffer and Meyer-Walf 1996; Hawes et al. 2005; Neuffer et al. 2011; Wesse et al. 2021). However, no particular genetic, cytological, morphological, or phenological variants have been described within Canadian populations, although Wesse et al. (2021) incorporated Canadian accessions in their global analysis of variation in C. bursa-pastoris.

In Canada, a chromosome count of 2n = 32 is based on cytological specimens from Ontario, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia (Mulligan 1957, 1984; Taylor and Mulligan 1968) and 2n = 32 is given as the standard count in North America (Al-Shehbaz 2012) and Europe (Neuffer 1990; Slotte et al.2007). While counts of 2n = 16 have occasionally been reported, these counts most likely represent counts for Capsella rubella Reuter, which has extremely similar morphology (Neuffer 1990; Slotte et al.2007). However, C. rubella has not yet been documented as occurring in North America.

Shull (1909, 1929) examined and measured variations in leaf morphology and segregated them into two species and ten subspecies. Similarly, Almquist (1923, 1929) divided C. bursa-pastoris taxa into some 200 microspecies based mostly on small variations in fruit structure (Neuffer and Hurka 1986b; Aksoy et al. 1999). In the British Isles approximately 25 segregates have been recognized showing variations in leaf and fruit shape (Stace 1997). An analysis by Iannetta et al. (2007) of populations in the United Kingdom (UK) concluded leaf-shape was not associated with geographical distribution and only loosely with life-history traits but studies in other regions such as the Swiss Alps have shown stronger associations (e.g., Neuffer and Bartelheim 1989; Neuffer 1990). Analysis of the genetic structure of these UK accessions using inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers showed a surprisingly large amount, almost 60%, of the genetic variation was attributed to individuals within an accession (Begg et al. 2012); this result is similar to more recent work by Wesse et al (2021) where 79% of the variation was found within populations in a regional analysis. Begg et al. (2012) also found three genetically differentiated clusters, the most defined of which was associated with the southern region, earlier flowering and increased seed production and reduced secondary dormancy, but not intensive cropping (Begg et al. 2012). Given the key role of rosette morphology in life history, Neuffer et al. (2018) examined the geographical distribution of four distinct rosette leaf types across the globe and their association with morphological, anatomical and physiological characteristics under different conditions. This revealed a complex pattern suggesting local adaptation of rosette characteristics overlaid with other factors such as genetic background.

Numerous studies have examined intraspecific variation in phenology in C. bursa-pastoris plants and its genetic basis. In general, researchers have found that there are ecotypes with differentiated flowering times that occur in areas with different temperature regimes whether as a result of latitude or elevation. For example, temperature-dependent variations in time to flowering and phenotypic plasticity were observed in wild populations along a transect from northern to southern Europe (Neuffer and Hurka 1986a). In the Swiss Alps, variations in such features as germination, flowering time and vegetative growth forms were correlated with altitude. Later flowering genotypes replaced earlier-flowering forms as elevation increased resulting in later flowering winter annual forms at high altitudes (Neuffer and Bartelheim 1989; Neuffer 1990). Similarly, California populations with early-flowering seem to have arisen from ancestral Spanish populations, while later-flowering populations in temperate North America have arisen from cooler, wetter northern European gene pools (Neuffer and Hurka 1999). Karley et al. (2008) also found the two flowering time variants in UK material and noted a strong, but negative correlation between flowering time and seed production, but none between seed production and reproductive duration. Therefore, Karley et al. (2008) concluded short flowering time combined with greater resource allocation to reproduction was the reason behind high fecundity (seed output). The genetic pathways that lead to these two flowering time variants were investigated in early flowering types obtained from Taiwan and late flowering types obtained from Sweden by Slotte et al. (2007). They found that the expression of two circadian genes, CCA1 and TOC1, and the modified function of the circadian clock function likely caused variation in flowering time, resulting in two extreme (early and late) flowering types. Linde et al. (2001) identified three quantitative trait loci (QTL) responsible for the onset of flowering. Given the likely linkage between flowering, rosette leaf development, and other factors (Linde et al. 2001), flowering induction is complex and more research is needed to elucidate the genetic pathway of flowering in C. bursa-pastoris. Overall the presence of both high dormancy/later flowering and low dormancy/earlier flowering appears to indicate a hedge betting strategy useful in variable environments.

An unusual heritable variant in floral morphology, first observed two centuries ago in Europe and described as Capsella apetala Opiz (Opiz 1821), is the recently rediscovered “decandric” or spermatogenesis-defective (spe) phenotype, in which all of the petals have been transformed into additional stamens (reviewed by Hintz et al. 2006; Hameister et al. 2009, 2013; Ziermann et al. 2009). A comparative study found that the flowers of the spe phenotype matured two weeks later in Germany, allowing stable coexistence with the wild type (Neuffer et al. 2020).

3. .

Economic Importance and Environmental Impact

(a) .

Detrimental

Capsella bursa-pastoris was the 20th most abundant weed in residual weed surveys in western Canada during the 2000s (Leeson et al. 2005). It was found in 9.2% of fields, in densities as high as 140 plants·m−2. It was most abundant in the Peace Lowland, Boreal Transition, Aspen Parkland and Fescue Grasslands ecoregions, and found in lower abundance in Interlake Plain, Moist Mixed Grassland and least in Mixed Grasslands and Lake Manitoba Plain. Globally, it is considered one of the most widespread plants on earth (Coquillat 1951; Zhou et al. 2001) and inevitably interferes with crop production, infesting winter cereals, horticultural crops, orchards, and forages (Aksoy et al. 1998).

Despite its observed frequency, research quantifying economic yield losses for C. bursa-pastoris alone has rarely been conducted. While it can contribute to yield losses of field crops in the Canadian Prairies, it is relatively non-competitive compared with other weeds in spring crops including cereals and canola (Welbank 1963). Capsella bursa-pastoris can cause serious yield losses in cole crops such as cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower or Brussel sprouts and in other horticultural crops such as onions because herbicides which control the weed would also cause crop injury (Freyman et al. 1992; Bitterlich et al. 1996; Dillard et al. 2004; Sikkema et al. 2007). However, it was less competitive than cultivated radish in pot experiments (Perera and Ayres 1992) and cabbage grown in narrow rows and in both narrow and wide rows with 10 cm planting intervals were unaffected by C. bursa-pastoris (Freyman et al. 1992). Due to its winter annual life cycle, however, C. bursa-pastoris is common in Canadian winter wheat fields. In a meta-analysis of herbicide trials conducted in Sweden, Milberg and Hallgren (2004) reported that C. bursa-pastoris was more economically detrimental in winter crops based on yield loss in cereal crops investigated in 1691 trials. They concluded that C. bursa-pastoris was one of the two worst weeds for autumn-sown cereal crops. Widespread infestation was also seen in Great Britain, where 23% of 2359 winter cereal fields were infested with C. bursa-pastoris (Marshall et al. 2003). Population densities of C. bursa-pastoris determined from barley and wheat fields over three seasons in New Zealand indicated a strong presence and high degree of competition with crops in their early developmental stages within fields undergoing normal crop management practices, including postemergence herbicide treatments (Bourdöt et al. 1998). In Denmark, the observed weed frequency of C. bursa-pastoris increased for spring barley, spring rape, winter rye and winter wheat in 2001–2004 compared with 1978–1989, but decreased in the multispecies assemblies of grass leys (Andreasen and Stryhn 2008). Capsella bursa-pastoris is generally a component of the common broadleaf weed assemblage for which a wide range of herbicides are available (see Section 11. Response to Herbicides and Other Chemicals).

A suspected nitrite poisoning of pigs in South Africa was attributed to consumption of C. bursa-pastoris (Wiese and Joubert 2001) and cattle grazing on a mixture of 40% C. bursa-pastoris and 60% Sisymbrium irio L., another member of the Brassicaceae, died from polioencephalomalacia, a neurologic disease of ruminants, as a result of the sulfur content of the plants (McKenzie et al. 2009). However, the plant is listed as having no known poisoning risk and moderate palatability to goats (Simmonds et al. 2000) and has been used as a folk remedy for treating ailments in livestock (see Section 3(b) Beneficial).

Populations of C. bursa-pastoris can pose a risk to crop health, production, and quality as it is a host to insect, nematode, fungal, viral and bacterial pests, including spore-forming bacilli (Iannetta et al. 2010; see Section 13. Response to Herbivory, Disease and Higher Plant Parasites).

(b) .

Beneficial

Because of its widespread availability C. bursa-pastoris has a long tradition of use as a potherb (a plant used in seasoning of food prepared by boiling in a pot) and in folk medicine in the majority of cultures around the world (Bussmann et al. 2019). Young leaves were cooked as greens or eaten raw as salad; seed pods were used as a peppery seasoning, seeds were dried and ground into meal, and roots were used as a ginger substitute. In Japan, the plant was an ingredient in a ceremonial barley–rice gruel (Facciola 1990; Defelice 2001) and it is eaten frequently in Korea, where its leaves and roots are consumed as vegetables (Lee et al. 2016). As a food plant, the species contains significant vitamins and minerals (Zennie and Ogzewalla 1977; Choi et al. 2014). However, an analysis of heavy metal content in wild food plants collected in an industrialized zone of Turkey showed higher than average levels of cobalt, lead, manganese, and iron in C. bursa-pastoris, placing it among plants hazardous to health if eaten in large quantities (Pehlivan et al. 2013).

Numerous medicinal properties ranging from analgesic to vermifuge (anti-parasite) have traditionally been attributed to extracts from the plant both for humans and livestock (Duke 2002), but it has primarily been associated with reducing internal or external bleeding. It has been used to staunch bleeding and to heal infected and bleeding wounds (Gerard 1633), and to treat such conditions as dysentery, bleeding, menstrual disorders and stomach problems, or as a diuretic (Defelice 2001; Kozub et al. 2012; Choi et al. 2014). Hartwell (1982) cited popular European sources dating to the medieval period on the use of infusions of C. bursa-pastoris to treat ulcers and cancers, including those of the stomach and uterus. Millspaugh (1974) indicated that the plant was used to treat diarrhoea in calves in England and its use was reported as folk-remedy for livestock in Switzerland (Bischoff et al. 2016). Based on these traditional uses, several studies have investigated C. bursa-pastoris or its extracts for these properties in cell culture; anti-thrombin (blood clotting) (Goun et al. 2002), anti-cancer (Mazzio and Soliman 2009; Lee et al. 2013), anti-bacterial (Fahey et al. 2002), and anti-inflammatory properties (Hur et al. 2013; Choi et al. 2014). For example, isothiocyanate sulforaphane extracted from crucifers was shown to inhibit antibiotic-resistant strains of the bacterium Helicobacter pylori, associated with gastric ulcers and stomach cancer in tissue culture (Fahey et al. 2002).

Weeds such as C. bursa-pastoris play a role in maintaining biological diversity within crop fields (Storkey and Westbury 2007; Begg et al. 2012). For example, the species’ phenotypic and biochemical variability provides a heterogeneous resource for phloem-feeding aphids (Karley et al. 2008). Five insect families, 13 species, two of which are host specific, and three of which are pests, were associated with C. bursa-pastoris in winter cereal fields in Great Britain (Marshall et al. 2003). Capsella bursa-pastoris was also deemed important for 2–3 UK seed-feeding farmland birds and 11–25 invertebrates (Marshall et al. 2003). Andreasen and Stryhn (2008) suggest the increasing abundance of Brassicaceous weeds may improve food availability for birds and insects in arable lands.

Capsella bursa-pastoris extracts can be used as weed control against annual ryegrass and wild radish, though annual ryegrass is affected more (Seal et al. 2009). Extract concentrations of 5% or more were able to significantly inhibit growth for both aforementioned weeds, this includes root growth. A 400% concentrated extract was able to inhibit annual ryegrass shoot length and weight by more than 70% when grown in a tray filled with 50:50 sand:peat moss (Seal et al. 2009).

As an extremely abundant and widespread plant on the planet, C. bursa-pastoris is an important model organism for studies in a wide variety of areas including the evolutionary ecology of weeds (Nutt et al. 2006; Hintz et al. 2006; Choi et al. 2019; Žerdoner Čalasan et al. 2021) and genome evolution following hybridization and polyploidization (Hurka and Neuffer 1997; Slotte et al. 2007; Kasianov et al. 2017). Because it exhibits a wide range of genetic variation among populations, many studies have looked at patterns across its geographic range to examine the evolutionary mechanisms involved (Slotte et al. 2007; Neuffer 2011; Begg et al. 2012; Toorop et al. 2012).

(c) .

Legislation

In Canada, C. bursa-pastoris is not listed under either the federal Plant Protection Act or the Federal Weed Seeds Order 2016, under the Seed Act. After its removal from Alberta noxious weed legislation, Manitoba remains the only province that has continued to designate the species a noxious weed (Noxious Weeds Act, CCSM c. N110 2010). In the United States, C. bursa-pastoris is not listed on either federal or state noxious weeds lists; but has been reported as invasive in several states [Invasive Plant Atlas of the United States ( http://www.invasiveplantatlas.org/)].

4. .

Geographical Distribution

Capsella bursa-pastoris, a species of Eurasian, probably eastern Mediterranean origin, occurs broadly distributed around the world in temperate regions in both hemispheres and at scattered locations from tropical highlands to sub-arctic regions (Hultén and Fries 1986). In Canada, C. bursa-pastoris is present throughout agricultural regions in all provinces, including Newfoundland and Labrador, the Yukon and the Northwest territories (Darbyshire 2003; Fig. 2). Collections in Canadian herbaria show particular abundance in southern British Columbia, southern Manitoba, and throughout the Niagara Peninsula and the St. Lawrence Valley, as well as collections from eastern Alaska, southwestern Greenland, and the French islands of St. Pierre and Miquelon (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Distribution of Capsella bursa-pastoris in Canada based on herbarium collection from ACAD, ALTA, AUC, BABY, CAN, DAO, LEA, LKHD, MT, NHIC, OFRI, PMAE, QK, QUE, RBG, ROM, SASK, SSMF, UAC, UBC, ULF, UNB, V and WIN herbaria. See Holmgren et al. (1990) for institutional abbreviations. Esri Inc. ArcMap (Version 10.6.1). Software. Redlands, CA: Esri Inc, 2016. Basemap source: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Tinermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esric China (Hong Kong), © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community.

cjps-2021-0059f2.tif

It is relatively abundant throughout continental United States, with a presence in all 50 states (Al-Shehbaz 2012) and greatest abundance in the Atlantic, south-central and Pacific states (Hultén and Fries 1986). It is especially common in southwestern Mexico (Frankton and Mulligan 1987; Defelice 2001). Aksoy et al. (1998) considered it native to eastern Europe, while Mukherjee et al. (1984) considered all the populations in Switzerland, Afghanistan, Germany, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands and Scotland at various altitudes and latitudes to represent native populations. Populations considered native were also studied along a latitudinal transect from the Kola Peninsula to the Caspian Sea and from northern and southern Scandinavia by Neuffer (2011).

Wesse et al. (2021) conducted a global survey of the genetic variation of C. bursa-pastoris from 1469 natural provenances from diverse locations in the native and introduced range. A moderate reduction in genetic diversity was observed among introduced populations, and it was concluded that there were two broad climatic variants, one adapted for warm arid conditions and the second to temperate humid conditions, and that by and large the world colonization was accomplished through multiple introductions of genotypes pre-adapted to diverse niches (Wesse et al. 2021).

5. .

Habitat

(a) .

Climatic requirements

Capsella bursa-pastoris is adapted to a wide range of micro-climates around the world but is commonly found growing in cool and warm (subtropical) temperate regions, as indicated by its broad range in Canada where it grows in all provinces and territories (Aksoy et al. 1998; Defelice 2001; Fig. 2). However, the species is also well-adapted to drought conditions (see Section 7(a) Morphology). Its presence was recorded in the Nile valley where the average rainfall was 20 mm in spring and mean temperature near 27 °C in May. In Germany, it survives as a rosette over winter, when the temperature can be as low as −12 °C (Aksoy et al. 1998). Capsella bursa-pastoris is restricted to flat or gently sloped regions but is more common on south-facing slopes (Grime et al. 2014).

(b) .

Substratum

Capsella bursa-pastoris grows in various types of soils, however it grows predominantly on fertile-disturbed, clay to sandy loam soil (Aksoy et al. 1998; Defelice 2001; Grime et al. 2014). It can tolerate soil with pH 5–8 (Aksoy et al. 1998) but is absent from regions with a soil pH less than 5 (Grime et al. 2014). Aksoy et al. (1998) curated a list of soil types where C. bursa-pastoris has been recorded including: serpentine soils in southern Urals (Brooks 1987), loess soil in Lublin, Poland (Lipecki 1989), alkaline sandy loam soils found in the Nile Valley in Egypt (El-Habibi and Youssef 1981), calcium carbonate enriched sandy loam soil in Turkey (Aksoy and Gemici 1993) and wet humus-rich soil in Korea (Kang 1983). Capsella bursa-pastoris has also been recorded growing on soil contaminated by cadmium (Liu et al. 2015).

(c) .

Communities

Apart from the cultivated grain and vegetable crops where the species is a weed (see Section 3(a) Detrimental), C. bursa-pastoris is present in a variety of ruderal and disturbed communities wherever it occurs. This includes waste fields, demolition plots, manure piles, compost heaps, roadsides, and gravel parking lots (Alex and Switzer 1976; Aksoy et al. 1998). In Canada, it has been found in gardens, orchards, vineyards, pastures, meadows, and beaches (Canadian herbarium records). In the United States, the species, along with other winter annuals such as chickweed (Stellaria media L.), field pennycress, and henbit (Lamium amplexicaule L.) have been moving into crop areas (Hill et al. 2014). Within the United Kingdom, the species has been dominant in several vegetation communities: the chickweed–Capsella and the chickweed– nettle (Urtica urens L.) communities, and in the plantain (Plantago major L.) and bindweed [Fallopia convolvulus (L.) Á. Löve] – speedwell (Polygonum aviculare Poir.) subcommunities; and is a minor component of other communities of herbs including other crucifers such as field pennycress (Thlaspi arvense L.) and grasses, including meadow grass (Poa annua L.) and rye-grass (Lolium perenne L.) (Pigott et al. 2000); while in other parts of Europe it is among plant communities dominated by members of the Chenopodioideae such as Amaranthus and Chenopodium spp., and among such communities in alpine pine-spruce stands and in vineyards (Aksoy et al. 1998; Konstantinović and Blagojević 2014). The species is ubiquitous in Germany, along with other species in the above-mentioned communities (Hanzlik and Gerowitt 2012).

6. .

History

In Canada, C. bursa-pastoris was already established in Quebec when collected in Montreal in 1821 (Rousseau 1968); and it was recorded in Nova Scotia as early as 1829 (Groh 1947). It continued to spread in areas along the St. Lawrence River and by the 1950s was found at sub-arctic trading posts around James Bay. In Ontario, it was collected as early as 1885 and was widespread in the first half of the 20th century. It was established across the prairies with a record in Victoria, British Columbia, in 1894, and other early collections dated from 1899, 1911 and 1924 in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, respectively. It had reached the Northwest Territories and Yukon by the 1940s with a record collected for Cape Dorset in Nunavut, in 1936 (Groh 1947; Canadian herbarium records).

The introduction of Capsella bursa-pastoris to the United States and Mexico occurred before introductions into Canada, very early in the colonial period and was likely introduced repeatedly. Indeed, on investigating the genetic makeup of populations in Europe (593 populations) and North America (88 populations – 7 Canadian), Neuffer and Hurka (1999) suggested C. bursa-pastoris was introduced to North America on at least 20 separate occasions. It was recorded as present in New England in 1672; and by the 19th century was referred to as “The commonest of weeds, introduced from Europe” (Gray 1848). It is believed to have been introduced to Mexico at the time of the Spanish conquest in the early 17th century; to have reached California following the establishment of the Spanish Missions there, particularly during the late Spanish and Mexican eras after 1824; and during the following gold rush, seeds could have come by transportation routes from the south and the east, as well as from Europe (Neuffer and Hurka 1999).

More broadly, the genus Capsella originated in the eastern Mediterranean, including Asia Minor as part of the diversification of the tribe Camelineae which also includes Arabidopsis and Camelina (Žerdoner Čalasan et al. 2019). Capsella bursa-pastoris is likely a 100 000–300 000- year-old hybrid originating from Capsella orientalis Klokov and C. grandiflora (Faucheé & Chaub.) Boiss. or C. rubella lineages. Maternal contributions were made from the C. orientalis lineage based on chloroplast DNA clustering while the Capsella grandiflora/rubella lineage made paternal contributions, resulting in an allopolyploid hybrid (Hurka et al. 2012; Douglas et al. 2015; Žerdoner Čalasan et al. 2021). An analysis by Žerdoner Čalasan et al. (2021) showed the hybridization resulting in C. bursa-pastoris took place in the southwestern East European plain during Late Pleistocene interglacial cycles. Early Neolithic records of C. bursa-pastoris seeds are reported in Turkey between 5850 and 5600 BC whereas in central Europe the earliest records date from the Neolithic, approximately 4000 BC (Willerding 1986 quoted in Hurka and Neuffer 1997). Presumably, it was spread from Central Europe via agriculture.

7. .

Growth and Development

(a) .

Morphology

Capsella bursa-pastoris, like other ruderal species, is characterized by phenotypic plasticity and genetic adaptability across a range of traits including height, rosette size, floral biology, and seed and fruit morphology (Hurka and Benneweg 1979; Neuffer and Hoffrogge 2000; Neuffer 2011; Neuffer and Paetsch 2013). Several common garden experiments have revealed variation in height is driven by both genetic differentiation and phenotypic plasticity (Neuffer and Hurka 1986b; Neuffer and Alberts 1996; Neuffer and Hoffrogge 2000). It forms a rosette, an adaptation for overwintering, and cold responsive (COR) genes have been shown to be promoted with rosette leaves in response to cold temperatures (Lin et al. 2016). Similarly, variation in petal size is strongly influenced by temperature, with warmer temperatures promoting larger petal growth (Neuffer and Paetsch 2013). Prolific seed production enables widespread dispersal of C. bursa-pastoris and seeds produce a mucilaginous sheath upon hydration (myxospermy), which can enhance water absorption, particularly in dry soil (Deng et al. 2015) and has likely played a major role in long-term dispersal success of the species (Neuffer et al. 2011). Its deep tap root (up to 33 cm) enables it to access water at considerable depth, also contributing to its ability to withstand drought conditions (Johnson et al. 2011).

(b) .

Perennation

Capsella bursa-pastoris is a summer or winter annual. It reproduces by seeds only (Neuffer 1990; Aksoy et al. 1998).

(c) .

Physiology and biochemistry

Capsella bursa-pastoris is a C3, facultative winter annual that may overwinter as a rosette or emerge very early in spring. Cici and Van Acker (2011) investigated the freezing tolerance/recovery of several winter annual species and reported that C. bursa-pastoris, had lower cold tolerance than narrow-leaved hawksbeard, (Crepis tectorum L.), stinkweed/field pennycress (Thlaspi arvense L.), and field violet (Viola arvensis Murr.), but similar cold tolerance to downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) and common chickweed [Stellaria media (L.) Vill.]. Specifically, C. bursa-pastoris plants showed 50% freezing damage at −14 °C with freezing tolerance mediated by a 21-fold increase in proline levels. Wani et al. (2018) analyzed cold stress responses of 30-day-old seedlings by exposing them to 10 °C and collecting plant tissues at 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h. Results indicated that cold stress reduced photosynthesis, but that turgor and osmotic pressure were maintained by increased levels of soluble sugars, saturated, and unsaturated fatty acids (Wani et al. 2018).

The performance of C. bursa-pastoris has been evaluated under light, water, and nutrient stress (Aksoy et al. 1998). The plant grows in both open and shaded areas, though leaf lengths were shorter under light flux reduction compared with full sun. Capsella bursa-pastoris had the highest total dry weight when it was watered for 4 consecutive days out of 14, compared with treatments with fewer or more (2, 6, 8, or 10) consecutive watering days. Nutrient requirements were tested in sand cultures over a 14 h day. Calcium treatments ranging from 5 to 200 μg·mL−1 increased total dry weight while calcium levels between 5 and 15 μg·mL−1 resulted in the rosette leaves to curl, indicating deficiency. Fertilization with phosphorus resulted in maximum root and shoot dry weight when supplied at 16 μg·mL−1. Nitrogen supplied at various concentrations increased total dry weight until 81 μg·mL−1 but declined significantly at 243 μg·mL−1. Potassium supplied at various concentrations increased total dry weight until 32 μg·mL−1, and then declined (Aksoy et al. 1998). Fertilization with ammonium nitrate may cause injury, with retention of the solution enhanced by trichomes on C. bursa-pastoris leaves (Bitterlich and Upadhyaya 1990).

The average lipid content of C. bursa-pastoris seed is reported to be 30%, though higher lipid contents are observed in plants from temperate regions compared with those from colder regions. The fatty acid profile has a relatively large proportion of very long-chain fatty acids (> C18) as is characteristic of seeds from the Brassicaceae (Mukherjee et al. 1984). Specifically, the fatty acid profile of C. bursa-pastoris seed is dominated by 25%–40% linolenic acid (C18:3), 20% linoleic acid (C18:2) and has noteworthy levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids icosadienoic (C20:2; 10%–20%) and icosatrienoic acids (C20:3; 5%–15%), but has little erucic acid (C22:1), often a major component of brassicaceous seeds (Mukherjee et al. 1984; Moser and Vaughn 2012; Al-Snafi 2015). The roots and the aerial portions of the plants also contain these fatty acids (Al-Snafi 2015; Grosso et al. 2011). The levels of flavonoids, organic acids, and sterols among other chemicals have also been assessed, including their relationship to light and temperature at places of origin (Eschmann-Grupe et al. 1990; Grosso et al. 2011).

(d) .

Phenology

In Canada, C. bursa-pastoris can flower from early spring to late fall (Frankton and Mulligan 1987). Aksoy et al. (1998) detailed the phenology of plants in Britain where seeds germinate primarily at the beginning of March, with a small germination event after August. The first rosette leaves are produced 12–14 d after germination. If germinated early, the rosette continues to grow until the beginning of June, while the first shoot appears by the beginning of May. Flower formation is initiated 3–4 d after shoot development starts, ripe seeds and fruits appear at the end of May with seeds released from June on (Aksoy et al. 1998). The time required before the onset of flowering has been reported to vary widely for European populations of C. bursa-pastoris (see section Intraspecific Variation). Iannetta et al. (2007) reported that early flowering variants required 70 d to flower, while other variants required >130 d.

(e) .

Mycorrhiza

Traditionally, plants of the Brassicaceae family, and C. bursa-pastoris in particular, were thought to be non-mycorrhizal (Gerdeman 1968; Medve 1983). Demars and Boerner (1994, 1995) observed vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization of C. bursa-pastoris in plants grown alone, and a greater level of colonization in plants grown in a grass matrix. However, this does not necessarily mean that C. bursa-pastoris is mycorrhizal, as it could mean that the mycorrhizae were attacking senescent roots. Alternatively, colonization did occur but only on a sporadic basis with the mycorrhizae mainly colonizing the grass species. Populations were sampled from both lawn and waste area habitats. Fungal colonization was significantly higher in lawn habitats, most likely due to the presence of strongly mycorrhizal plants. Internal hyphae, vesicles, chlamydospores and extramatrical hyphae were found from C. bursa-pastoris root segments investigated, but no arbuscles (Demars and Boerner 1994). Chawla et al. (2011) found arbuscules and extramatrical hyphae but no vesicular structures from populations in India and concluded C. bursa-pastoris may aid in maintaining mycorrhizal inoculum in the soil during winter.

8. .

Reproduction

(a) .

Floral biology

Capsella bursa-pastoris is self-compatible and primarily self-pollinating (autogamous), the extent to which varies with environmental conditions and other interactions. Nearly exclusive self-pollination occurs when the atmospheric humidity is high, temperature is over 15 °C and light intensity is low. Outcrossing is favoured under dry, sunny conditions (Hurka et al. 1976) with up to 10% outcrossing recorded under field conditions (Hurka et al. 1989). Sterile fruits are produced under extremely cold or hot conditions and this has been attributed to the failure of the anthers opening. Compared with self-incompatible Capsella species such as C. grandiflora, C. bursa-pastoris has smaller petals, lower pollen production, shorter styles and more rapid fertilization after pollination from compatible pollen (Hurka et al. 1976; Neuffer and Paetsch 2013). Examples of flower insect visitors included hoverflies (Syrphidae), bees (Apidae), beetles (Coleoptera) and thrips (Thysanoptera) for a population studied in Germany (Ziermann et al. 2009). The unique spe floral type where petals are replaced by stamens tends to attract hoverflies rather than bees as typical of the wild type (Neuffer et al. 2020). Homeotic mutants with stamenoid petals found close to Mainz, Germany exhibited half the number of insect visitations and no emission of volatile monoterpenes and benzenoids compared with wild type plants. Both the mutant and wild type plants attracted the same types of visitors (Ziermann et al. 2009). Day-length influences the onset of flowering time; C. bursa-pastoris behaves as a facultative long-day plant (Hurka et al. 1976).

(b) .

Seed production and dispersal

Capsella bursa-pastoris is a prolific seed producer, but production per plant is highly variable. Hurka and Neuffer (1991) reported seed production from individuals from seven European populations ranging from 100 to 91 000 seeds plant−1. Hill et al. (2014) reported seed production from naturally occurring stands at 800 to 40 000 seed m−2 from 40 to 230 plants·m−2. Individual plant seed production ranged from a minimum of 5000 to a maximum of 90 000 seeds in a German study (Hurka and Haase 1982). Seed production per plant was increased by fertilization, and linked to increased branching (Yang 2018). The seed is 1 mm long and weighs approximately 0.1 mg on average but is highly variable. Seed weights reported for a variety of environments are relatively consistent. Mukherjee et al. (1984) reported seed weights from 0.093–0.156 g per 1000 seeds for material collected from a variety of elevations (10 to 2400 m) and latitudes (36 to 69 °N). Similarly, Werle et al. (2014) reported weights of 0.0110 ± 0.0001 and 0.0108 ± 0.0002 g per 100 seeds in two different years (2010 and 2011) from a farm field in Nebraska, USA, and Benvenuti (2007) reported 0.092 ± 0.071 per 1000 seeds from farm fields in Asciano, Italy. Seed size affects the germination rate and hypocotyl length of seedlings, with hypocotyl length longer in seedlings from larger seeds (Hurka and Benneweg 1979). Seed count varies from 10 to 40 seeds per fruit. Seeds are dormant at the time of dispersal. When the seed pod is ripe, it opens along its septa, but the seeds are not released immediately, lengthening the time over which seeds disperse and seedlings emerge (Hurka and Haase 1982). The small spherical, smooth seeds disperse unassisted within 50 cm of the parent plant (Aksoy et al. 1998), while for wind-aided dispersal, 80% of seed fell within 50 cm but 20% was scattered between 50 and 105 cm. The size and shape of the seed increases the probability of seed burial, even in the absence of tillage (Benvenuti 2007). It was observed the seeds were equally distributed in the first 10 cm of the soil, after which the frequency declined. No seeds were observed at 40 cm soil depth; this was attributed to the soil conditions at the field station (Hurka and Haase 1982). The mucilaginous sheath around the seed may enable long-distance dispersal by facilitating attachment to animals, vehicles, and people. Earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris L.) ingest the seeds and release them in their casts. This contributes to short-distance vertical dispersion and germination (Hurka and Haase 1982).

(c) .

Seed banks, seed viability and germination

Capsella bursa-pastoris has a persistent seed bank that can vary in size. Hurka and Neuffer (1991) reported a broad range of seed banks, from 500 to 300 000 seed m−2 in various German environments. Sanderson et al. (2014) reported seed banks (as determined by germinable seeds) in organic dairy hay, permanent and recently established pastures at between 11 to 8580 seed·m−2. In cotton–tomato rotations in California, seed banks ranged between 8 and 1220 seed·m−2, with the highest seed bank exhibited in conservation tillage treatments with cover crops (Shrestha et al. 2015). Larger seed banks may be favored by a lack of soil disturbance, as viable seeds survive longer in undisturbed soil than in cultivated soil. In experiments conducted in the United Kingdom, C. bursa-pastoris seed was buried in disturbed and undisturbed soil and seed emergence and viability monitored over 6 years (Roberts and Feast 1973). In cultivated soil, they recorded 18% and 12% emergence in the first and second years, with a total of 46% emergence over the 6 years of the study and 4% of the seeds remaining viable in the soil. In uncultivated soil the emergence rates were lower, 5% and 1% in the first and second years and 12% total emergence over the 6 years, however 23% of the seeds remained viable in the seed bank. Similarly, Kivilaan and Bandurski (1981) reported that C. bursa-pastoris remained viable in Dr. Beal’s Alaska seed viability experiment for >35 yr, while Conn and Deck (1995) reported that seed germination declined from an initial 48% germination rate to 42, 42, 30, 9 and <1% after 2.7, 3.7, 4.7, 6.7 and 9.7 years, respectively. However, after this initial sharp decline in germination rate, seeds showed long-term persistence with viability remaining at a constant low level to 24.7 years. Specifically, viability for C. bursa-pastoris was 1.3% at 19.7 yr and 2.8% at 24.7 yr and further, unlike the majority of species tested, over a third of the seed still exhibited dormancy after 24.7 yr (Conn and Werdin-Pfisterer 2010). Baskin and Baskin (2006) combined data from the Duvel experiment, which lasted 39 yr and the Beal experiment which lasted 120 yr and suggested C. bursa-pastoris seeds can remain viable in the soil after 39–40 yr. However, the seed half-life according to Roberts and Feast (1973) is 5 yr which is further reduced to 1 yr if the soil is annually disturbed through cultivation (Aksoy et al. 1998). This suggests that in the absence of seed bank replacement, seed banks decrease more rapidly in cultivated soils, while C. bursa-pastoris can persist longer in wastelands, rights-of-way, and perennial crops.

Temperature alters germination success with low temperatures inhibiting germination and growth (Wani et al. 2018). Seed germination of populations from Scandinavia, the European Alps and the Middle East was tested in growth chambers and greenhouses under five to seven different temperature treatments, showing a trend in greater germination with increased temperature (Neuffer and Hurka 1988). Neuffer and Hurka (1988) also observed that seed age influenced both germination capacity, the proportion of seed that germinated, and germination rate, the time taken for 50% of the seeds to germinate, with decreased germination with seed age. Seed dormancy level also influences germination timing (Neuffer and Hurka 1988; Toorop et al. 2012). Germination occurred from 10–30 °C, while soil pH ranged from 3 to 11 for seeds collected from a wheat field from Qarakheyl Crop Research Station, Iran (Rezvani et al. 2014). At 30 °C, the greatest germination rate was obtained under a 12/12-h light/dark treatment. In another study conducted in the Nile delta, the highest germination rates were obtained at 30–35 °C (Rayia et al. 2020).

Germination rates, seedling fresh mass, fresh root length and other traits indicative of germination and establishment were found to be higher when the plants were germinated in the presence of nematodes (Roberts et al. 2018).

In Canada, C. bursa-pastoris is a facultative winter annual with two distinct emergence peaks in late summer/fall and in spring. Cici and Van Acker (2009) reported that in Ontario, seeds from seedlings that emerged in August flowered in early spring (mid-April) and seeds from seedlings that emerged in spring flowered in May. In a Michigan study, seed maturity, expressed as 50% of seed release from the plant, occurred by 31 May and 28 May for 840 and 920 growing degree days (GDD), with a base temperature of 0 °C, in 2009 and 2010, respectively (Hill et al. 2014).

Dormancy triggers (release and re-entry) and germination triggers are an ecological adaptation mechanism that prevents germination under conditions unfavourable for survival of C. bursa-pastoris. Freshly harvested seed is almost completely dormant (primary dormancy) (Popay and Roberts 1970a; Baskin et al. 2004; Hill et al. 2014) and not all seed is released from dormancy in one year. After release from primary dormancy un-germinated seed may become conditionally dormant, depending on environmental conditions. Seed dormancy, both primary and (or) conditional, must be minimal to allow for seed germination. Baskin and Baskin (1989) reported that C. bursa-pastoris seed freshly harvested (dormant) in May became non-dormant (after-ripening) and capable of germinating after being exposed to high temperatures (25/15 to 35/20 °C day/night temperatures). Seeds that fail to germinate in fall or become conditionally dormant at 5 °C germinate in spring. Baskin et al. (2004) reported that seed collected from spring and fall germinated plants grown at high latitudes was dormant and neither was capable of germination in the fall, but rather it was only possible in spring the following year.

In the case of a small seeded species, depth of seed placement can be critical. Popay and Roberts (1970b) reported C. bursa-pastoris germination is influenced by light (red light stimulation), increased temperature, fluctuations between cool and warm temperatures, carbon dioxide (anoxia), soil nitrate and nitrite concentration, all of which could be influenced by depth of seed placement or by tillage. Under field conditions, Cici and Van Acker (2009) reported the primary microsite conditions; temperature, moisture and light were modified by CO2, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations. Optimal soil depths are reported to be < 2 cm.

In agricultural systems C. bursa-pastoris co-evolved with crops and predictable periodic disturbance (by tillage and/or herbicide). Annuals respond to the environment via dormancy/release, germination, and phenotypic plasticity to avoid disturbance, and successfully produce seed. Predictable emergence patterns may be useful for guiding the timing of weed control (Cici and Van Acker 2009). Werle et al. (2014) planted seeds of C. bursa-pastoris in July at four sites over two years in Nebraska and measured emergence for one year. For C. bursa-pastoris 30% emerged in fall with a further 70% emerging in late winter and spring. Soil temperature was the most useful parameter in modeling emergence, although soil moisture was necessary for germination. The time of emergence of the maternal plant may affect the seed germination and morphology of the seed and plant. Van Acker and Cici (2012) reported that spring emerging plants produced seed that germinated faster, flowered earlier, and resulted in differential allocation of biomass to roots and reproductive tissue.

(d) .

Vegetative reproduction

This species does not reproduce vegetatively.

9. .

Hybrids

Natural triploid hybrids, between the tetraploid C. bursa-pastoris and its diploid relative C. rubella Reut. (C. × gracilis Gren.) have occurred in mixed populations. In the UK such hybrids tend to have very long inflorescences, but very little seed (Stace 1997) indicating failure of the seed to develop. Successful hybrids are thought to be unlikely for several reasons: the chromosome number difference; C. bursa-pastoris and C. rubella are both primarily self-fertilizing; both possess very small nectaries reducing insect visitation; and the species have differences in flowering time with a tendency for the tetraploid species to flower earlier than the diploid (Neuffer and Eschner 1995; Hawes et al. 2005).

Several studies have investigated the inter-compatibility of C. bursa-pastoris and the emerging oilseed Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz, another member of the Camelineae tribe (Al-Shehbaz 2012), to assess the risk of transgene introgression. Séguin-Swartz et al. (2011) observed that when C. sativa was the male parent pollen tubes grew to the ovules indicating that no pre-fertilization barriers appear to exist between the species. Julié-Galau et al. (2014) recorded the production of eight hybrids in hand from 95 hand crosses (1 hybrid for 15 ovules pollinated) with C. sativa as the male parent, though the use of a hemizygous C. sativa marker (DsRed) to detect hybridization may mean that even this high estimate of hybridization could have underestimated the number of hybrids produced. The stamens in these hybrids failed to elongate and did not produce pollen. Martin et al. (2015) produced seven hybrids with pollination of Canadian accessions of C. bursa-pastoris by C. sativa, detected by DNA content using flow cytometry and species specific internal transcribed spacer (ITS) markers, from 1864 crosses and estimated a much lower hybridization rate of 1.5 hybrids per 10 000 ovules pollinated. As with those produced by Julié-Galau et al. (2014), hybrids had low pollen viability based on staining with a 2% acetocarmine solution and neither pollination by the parental species nor intentional self-pollination resulted in viable seed, leading to the conclusion that genome duplication may be the only route to F2 progeny between the species (Martin et al. 2015). Zhang and Auer (2020) obtained hybrids at rates lower than Julié-Galau et al. (2014) but higher than Martin et al. (2015), which produced low pollen and ovule numbers from bidirectional crosses with C. sativa as both the female (3.1 hybrids per 1000 ovules) and the male parent (2.9 hybrids per 1000 ovules). These hybrids also were unsuccessful in backcrosses.

Tissue culture techniques have also been used to attempt wider crosses. For example, somatic hybrids from C. bursa-pastoris protoplast and rapid-cycling Brassica oleracea have been generated to determine the potential for transferring Alternaria brassicicola resistance to the crop. Hybrid lines that resulted in rooted plants were planted in the soil and grown until flowering. They displayed combined morphological features, leaves were lanceolate with trichomes similar to Capsella and had serrated margins, similar to B. oleracea. Flowers showed intermediate morphology, but male sterility. When hybrids were pollinated with B. oleracea, no seed production was observed, indicating poor fertility. Alternaria brassicicola resistance was detected among one of the hybrids tested, indicating its use for breeding resistance. Unfortunately, these plants did not survive for a long period in the greenhouse (Sigareva and Earle 1999).

10. .

Population Dynamics

Capsella bursa-pastoris is an opportunistic annual plant that can colonize newly disturbed, open or dry environments, forming a high percent cover and is found ubiquitously in cultivated lands in Canada. In annual crops in western Canada, C. bursa-pastoris has been one of the 20 most abundant weeds since weed surveys were first conducted in 1970. In Canada, plants tend to emerge in two peaks in spring and late summer/fall (see Section 8(c) Seed banks, seed viability, and germination). It is found growing in various climates and niches; however, abundance decreases in less disturbed areas to exclusion once perennial grasses establish (Bosbach et al. 1982; Aksoy et al. 1998; Begg et al. 2012). For example, Monzeglio and Stoll (2005) describe C. bursa-pastoris as a weak competitor and determined that the species has higher fitness when in a monoculture than when mixed with other annual species. By evaluating accessions of C. bursa-pastoris from both a colonization front and from the core area of the natural range, Orsucci et al. (2020) demonstrated that although the ecotypes from the colonization showed less fitness, as measured through various growth and reproductive parameters, they were better able to avoid competition due to a shift in phenology.

11. .

Response to Herbicides and Other Chemicals

Capsella bursa-pastoris is susceptible to most foliar (post-emergence) herbicides recommended for the control of dicot annual weeds in a range of crops (OMAFRA 2020; Saskatchewan Guide to Crop Protection 2020). Herbicide resistant populations have been selected but are generally managed through the use of alternative herbicides or herbicide mixtures.

Capsella bursa-pastoris can be controlled with most broadleaf herbicides. Exceptions include group 3 mitotic inhibitors; group 4 auxinic herbicides in the pyridine carboxylic acid family; and group 6 photosystem II inhibitors. Control is influenced by the timing of herbicides application(s) in relation to annual and winter crop rotations and the time of emergence of this facultative winter annual weed. Residual control is often desirable, because multiple flushes of emergence usually occur throughout the spring and fall emergence period. It can be readily controlled by non-selective herbicides, such as glyphosate pre-seeding and glyphosate and glufosinate and with group 2 ALS inhibitors in herbicide resistant crops with the exception of ALS resistant populations (see below).

Capsella bursa-pastoris can be controlled (< 90%) in alfalfa and alfalfa grass mixtures with metribuzin applied in fall, spring applied imazethapyr and imazamox; while spring applied MCPA provided an average of 81% control (Wilson and Orloff 2008). In turf grass there are many available herbicides for control, the most commonly used herbicides are 2,4-D, 2,4-DP, mecoprop and dicamba (PennState Center for Turfgrass Science, accessed 10 July 2021,  https://extension.psu.edu/weed-management-in-turf#section-47). Capsella bursa-pastoris presents challenges to postemergence herbicide control in certain crops, such as cole crops, because of its similarity to the crop (Freyman et al. 1992).

Capsella bursa-pastoris has been selected for resistance to a number of herbicides. Resistance to ALS inhibitors was reported in Israel in 2000 (imazapyr), in Canada in 2008 (imazamox, imazethapyr, thifensulfuron method and tribenuron methyl), in China in 2009 (tribenuron-methyl), in Demark in 2012 (florasulam and tribenuron-methyl), and in Norway in 2019 (iodosulfuron-methyl-Na) (Wang et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2017; Heap 2021). Resistance to ALS inhibitor tribenuron methyl in populations from China was due to a single amino acid change at position 197 (Jin et al. 2011; Cui et al. 2012).

Resistance to the herbicide hexazine was reported in Oregon due to a change in the PSII target site change from Phe to Ile in the psbA gene at position Phe255 (Perez-Jones et al. 2009). This alteration conferred 22-fold resistance to hexazine compared with the susceptible population. The hexazinone-resistant population was cross-resistant to metribuzin but susceptible to atrazine, diuron and terbacil. Other reported cases of C. bursa-pastoris herbicide resistance include simazine-resistance in 1984 in Poland (Heap 2021).

12. .

Response to Other Human Manipulations

Many agronomic factors including tillage timing and intensity, nutrient regime, crop type, use of cover crops all can influence populations of C. bursa-pastoris. Increasing competition through cover crops or green manure and changing row spacing and flaming can be effective means of controlling or suppressing growth. The density of C. bursa-pastoris increased in the upper soil layer that was subjected to reduced tillage relative to conventional tillage in a study conducted to observe the effects of tillage on weed density in California (Fennimore and Jackson 2003).

A variety of cover crops and green manures have been reported to reduce C. bursa-pastoris emergence or density. Brassica napus L. or Sinapis alba L. planted in fall and incorporated into the soil in spring prior to planting of peas provided 76% and 97% suppression of C. bursa-pastoris emergence, respectively in Mt. Vernon, Washington, USA (Al-Khatib et al. 1997). In Germany in organic Triticum aestivum L. fields, legume cover crops, a mixture of Trifolium repens L., Trifolium subterraneum L., Medicago truncatula Gaertner and Lotus corniculatus L., were able to suppress C. bursa-pastoris at one site compared with the control treatment (Hiltbrunner et al. 2007). Buckwheat residues reduced emergence and growth of C. bursa-pastoris compared with bare soil, by reducing available nitrogen, but the addition of nitrogen fertilizer negated this effect (Kumar et al. 2008). Mennan et al. (2009) reported that cover crop residue from grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], sudangrass [Sorghum ×drummondii (Nees ex Steud.) Millsp. & Chase], hairy vetch, (Vicia villosa Roth), grain amaranth (Amaranthus sp.), or pea (Pisum sativum L.) residue suppressed emergence of C. bursa-pastoris for organic kale production. Franczuk et al. (2010) reported that cover crops phacelia (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.), vetch (Vicia sativa L.), serradella (Ornithopus sativus Brot.), and oat (Avena sativa L.) suppressed C. bursa-pastoris emergence in onion (Allium cepa L.) and cabbage (Brassica oleraceae L.) crops. Planting cabbage at higher densities can also reduce C. bursa-pastoris growth between the rows (Freyman et al. 1992). Weed flaming can also effectively control C. bursa-pastoris in the cotyledon stage but requires a higher flaming dose in the rosette stage (2 to 5 leaves) (Sivesind et al. 2009). Harvest weed seed control promises to provide a tool for reducing populations of seed banking plants like C. bursa-pastoris; a Danish study identified it as a reasonably good target, i.e., “intermediate,” for this control method (Bitarafan and Andreasen 2020).

Capsella bursa-pastoris is common in annual pastures and perennial forages in western Canada. It was reported to be more common in annual than perennial forages, especially in the spring with increased grazing intensity leading to increased density (Harker et al. 2000). Disturbances and fertilizer application generally increase C. bursa-pastoris abundance and fecundity in pastures. While soil compacted due to trampling results in short and twisted roots, trampling provided better dispersal, rapid germination, and establishment (Ellenberg 1988; Aksoy et al. 1998). Neuffer and Meyer-Walf (1996) reported that by comparison to an arable field, C. bursa-pastoris growing in a trampled area exhibited later but more plastic flowering onset with more vigorous rosettes, and greater variation in other growth parameters, but less seed production. Plants in the trampling area also showed a greater response to nutrient additions.

13. .

Response to Herbivory, Disease and Higher Plant Parasites

(a) .

Herbivory

(i) .

Mammals

In annual cattle pastures in Alberta, C. bursa-pastoris and other annual forbs declined in numbers over the season because although the cattle grazed mainly on sown forage grasses, grazing removed the apical meristem of the weeds, leaving little opportunity for the weed seedlings to re-establish later in the season (Harker et al. 2000). In Great Britain, C. bursa-pastoris grazed by cattle, sheep, and other grazers such as yaks (Aksoy et al. 1998) and by rabbits in grasslands had reduced populations and exhibited delayed flowering in damaged plants for up to four weeks (Crawley 1990).

(ii) .

Birds or other vertebrates

Marshall et al. (2003) recorded feeding by several bird species on seeds of C. bursa-pastoris.

(iii) .

Insects

Lepidoptera

Capsella bursa-pastoris is among the more frequently visited wild cruciferous plants by the butterfly Ancharis cardamines L. (Pieridae) (Wiklund and Friberg 2009). Eggs are laid on the flowering ramets which provide food for the developing larvae as the fruits mature. Over a five-year study period 9.3%–12.4% of larvae survived on C. bursa-pastoris, with the leading causes of larval mortality being starvation in very dry summer periods and attacks by braconid wasps. Compared with other summer-flowering mustards, C. bursa-pastoris encountered less herbivory by Pieris rapae L., the cabbage white butterfly and supported less relative growth rate of the first instar in common garden conditions (Lariviere et al. 2015). Similarly, C. bursa-pastoris is among brassicaceous host species of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (L.) (Plutellidae) and despite supporting low insect growth and survival rates, their overwintering seedlings can be bridge hosts until more-favourable annual wild or crop plants become available (Sarfraz et a. 2011). In British Columbia vineyards, C. bursa-pastoris is a host of the climbing cutworm pest of grapevines, Abagrotis orbis (Grote) (Noctuidae) (Mostafa et al. 2011) but the cutworm larvae did not survive beyond the third instar on Capsella, suggesting that it could reduce cutworm damage to the vines. In China, female adults of P. xylostella produced more eggs (over 300 per adult) on C. bursa-pastoris than on other wild host plants (Niu et al. 2014).

Hymenoptera

The parasitoid wasp Cotesia saltator Thunb. (Braconidae) frequently feeds on and kills the larvae of the butterfly Anthocharis cardamines found on C. bursa-pastoris and other wild cruciferous plants (Wiklund and Friberg 2009). Anaphes iole Girault (Mymaridae), a wasp parasitic on the eggs of Lygus spp., was not able to obtain meaningful food resources from C. bursa-pastoris, an important host of Lygus lineolaris P. Beauv. (Williams and Hendrix 2008). Among hosts of diamondback moth larvae, parasitism by the wasp Diadegma insulare (Cresson), as well as its growth rates and longevity, are lowest on C. bursa-pastoris (Sarfraz et al. 2012).

Thysanoptera

The western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande is the primary vector of viruses that infect crops and crop weeds, including C. bursa-pastoris, in California (Kuo et al. 2014; Section 13(b) iii Viruses).

Coleoptera

Different species of ground beetles (Carabidae) feed on the seeds of C. bursa-pastoris in many parts of the world, while at least one feeds on C. bursa-pastoris’ roots. Calathus ruficollis Dejean and Tanystoma maculicolle Dejean show very high seed predation rates in California vineyards: the highest rates of 64% ± 9% for the former and of 41% ± 11% for the latter occurred in the cover crop and untreated control (Sanguankeo and León 2011). Indeed in a lab experiment, Sanguankeo and León (2011) showed C. bursa-pastoris was one of the two out of eight weed species that was voluntarily eaten by carabid beetles. In the Czech Republic, seed consumption by Amara aenea DeGeer, A. familiaris (Duftschmid), A. similata (Gyllenhal) and (Pseudophonus) Harpalus rufipes DeGeer was more discriminating at the larval than at the adult stages: A. similata preferred seeds of C. bursa-pastoris at the first instar and adult stages, and A. aenea and A. similata showed higher reproductive rates on either single-seed Capsella diets, or mixed-seed diets (Saska 2008a; Klimeš and Saska 2010; Saska et al. 2014). The weevil Ceutorhynchus typhae (Herbst) feeds on seeds of C. bursa-pastoris in Europe and in eastern Canada (Muller et al. 2011). In Japan (Sasakawa 2011), C. bursa-pastoris is a food source for A. chalcites Dejean and A. congrua Morawitz, with 73% survival rates of the former and 60% of the latter. Mixed seed and larval diets were somewhat more important than single-seed diets in development and growth of new adults. Root herbivory by Phyllopertha horticola (L.) has been documented to result in substantial biomass loss (Gange and Brown 1989).

Hemiptera

Capsella bursa-pastoris is an accidental host of the cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae L. (Aphididae), permitting short-term development of the aphid following stylet penetration and sap ingestion, and a considerable delay between finding and accepting the phloem by the insect, suggesting a deterrent factor in the sieve elements of the plant (Gabryś and Pawluk 1999). The aphid Myzus ascolonicus Donc. (Aphididae) is known to transmit the beet mild yellowing virus (BMYV) and the beet western yellows virus (BWYV) to C. bursa-pastoris in Europe (Stevens et al. 1994). In China, C. bursa-pastoris is host of the small brown planthopper Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén) (Delphacidae) (Qiao et al. 2009). Three aphid species have been reported on C. bursa-pastoris in Indonesia: Aphis craccivora Koch, Myzus ornatus Laing and Rhopalosyphum padi L. (Noordam 2004). Intraspecific variation within C. bursa-pastoris resulted in differential responses by the phloem-feeding aphids Aphis fabae Scopoli and Myzus persicae Sulzer (Aphididae) to such variants as greater tissue water content, a low carbon/nitrogen ratio or lower phloem nitrogen (Karley et al. 2008). In arable field plots, sap-feeding insects were more attracted to early-flowering than to late-flowering ecotypes of C. bursa-pastoris (Karley et al. 2011). Capsella bursa-pastoris is a spring host of the tarnished plant bug Lygus lineolaris P. Beauv. (Miridae) in cotton crops in the Mississippi Delta (Snodgrass et al. 2006). The species is also a host of the wheat bug Nysius huttoni White (Lygaeidae) which damages wheat and cultivated cruciferous crops (Wei 2008). However, C. bursa-pastoris showed resistance towards Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) in a caged pot experiment (Singh et al. 2014).

Diptera

In cruciferous vegetable crops in southern Ontario, C. bursa-pastoris was among hosts of the swede midge Contarina nasturtii (Kieffer) (Cecidomyiidae) (Hallett 2007). Flower galls have been produced on C. bursa-pastoris by the gall midge Gephyraulus capsellae Skuhrava (Cecidomyiidae) (Skuhrava 2011).

(iv) .

Nematodes and (or) other non-vertebrates

Capsella bursa-pastoris was among weed hosts of the sugar-beet nematode Heterodera schachtii Schmidt in Germany; cysts were formed regularly and root diffusates increased hatching of the larvae (Gleissl et al. 1989). In Ohio soybean crops, C. bursa-pastoris was identified as a minor alternative host of the soybean cyst nematode, H. glycines Ichinohe, but was one of only four such hosts on which reproduction of the nematode occurred (Venkatesh et al. 2000). Attention has recently focused on alternative hosts of H. glycines among winter annual weeds such as C. bursa-pastoris, which have the potential to provide a niche for reproduction and population increase of this nematode pest in the seasonal absence of the soybean crop (Johnson et al. 2008). There is evidence of C. bursa-pastoris root consumption by ecto-parasitic nematode species Trichodorus and Paratrichodorus (Iannetta et al. 2010). The land slug Agriolimax caruanae Pollinera ate whole, or parts of, leaves of C. bursa-pastoris, resulting in reduced plant size, but almost never in death of the plant (Dirzo and Harper 1980). Herbivory by slugs on crucifers, including C. bursa-pastoris, resulted in a significant reduction in stem mass and fruit production (Rees and Brown 1992). The land slugs Arion lusitanicus (= A. vulgaris Mabille) and Deroceras reticulatum (O.F. Müller) are attracted to C. bursa-pastoris, and presence of the weed in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) crops considerably reduced the number of rape plants destroyed by the slugs (Frank and Friedli 1999). Indeed, the leaves of C. bursa-pastoris are highly palatable to D. reticulatum, as shown in leaf preference tests between C. bursa-pastoris and Triticum aestivum L. (Cook et al. 1996). The woodlice Armadillidium vulgare Latreille and Porcellio scaber Latreille, species of terrestrial isopods, were observed feeding on seeds of C. bursa-pastoris in crop fields and adjacent non-crop habitats (Saska 2008b; Saska et al. 2014).

(b) .

Diseases

(i) .

Fungi and oomycetes

Capsella bursa-pastoris is host to numerous fungal pathogens, listed in detail in Farr and Rossman (2020). These are summarized according to the type of disease transmitted to the plants. Unless otherwise indicated, the reference is (Farr and Rossman 2020).

Black leg

Both virulent and weakly-virulent strains of Leptosphaeria maculans (Sowerby) P. Kaarst, isolated from symptomless canola (Brassica napus L.), C. bursa-pastoris and other weeds in Saskatchewan, could act as a reservoir of inoculum of black leg disease in the absence of a canola crop (Petrie et al. 1995). This fungus has been reported in New Zealand.

Club root

Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin was reported in Canada (Connors 1967), a few US states, Australia, and New Zealand.

Leaf curl and wilt

The seed-borne Verticillium dahlia Kleba was reported in British Columbia, Canada (Ginns 1986). It is a major cause of wilt in lettuce crops in California, where virulent isolates of this fungus in C. bursa-pastoris and other weeds serve as inoculum in crops (Vallad et al. 2005).

Leaf spot

Mycosphaerella brassicicola (Duby) Lindau is a source of ringspot in Saskatchewan (Ginns 1986). Pseudocercosporella capsellae (Ellis & Everh.) Deighton produced white leaf spot in Ontario (Braun 1995), Saskatchewan (Ginns 1986), a few central states in the US, several countries in northern Europe, and in South Korea. Cylindrosporium capsellae Ellis and Everh. was reported in several central US states south to Texas. Sphaerella passeriniana Sacc. was reported in Spain, and Cercospora nasturtii var. capsellae Pass. in the former Soviet Union and Ukraine.

Mildews

Capsella bursa-pastoris can be host to powdery mildews of Erysiphe spp., particularly E. cruciferarum Opiz ex L. Junell, which are widespread in Europe, and have also been reported from Japan and India. As well as the downy mildews Hyaloperonospora (= Peronospora) spp., notably H. parasitica (Pers.) Constant., were reported from British Columbia and Saskatchewan in Canada (Ginns 1986), from Alaska (Connors 1967), from throughout the northern US, from Europe (Constantinescu and Fatehi 2002), Algeria, Central Asia, China, and India. Additionally the species has been reported to host Golovinomyces cichoracearum (DC.) V.P. Heluta was reported in Korea; G. orontii (Castagne) V.P. Veluta in Switzerland, Germany, Poland (Farr and Rossman 2020) and Slovenia (Radisek et al. 2018); and Oidium sp. in Australia.

Moulds

Cultural filtrates of the saprophytes Penicillium sp. and Aspergillus niveus Blochwitz suppressed the growth of seeds of C. bursa-pastoris in Ukraine (Savchuk 2012). The yeast-like saprophyte Tilletiopsis minor Nyland, identified in British Columbia, Canada, forms colonies on leaves (Urquhart et al. 1997). The saprophytes Trichoderma koningii Oudem. and T. viride Pers., reported in Poland, cause green mould rot. Sclerotinia spp., reported on C. bursa-pastoris in alfalfa fields in Maryland, US, caused leaf and stem blight (Morgan 1971). Other reports of white and grey moulds on C. bursa-pastoris include Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) De Bary in China and Taiwan, Botrytis cinerea Pers. in China; and Cladosporium cladosporioides (Fresen) G.A. de Vries and Scopulariopsis brumptii Salv.-Duval in Poland.

Root rot

Capsella bursa-pastoris was among hosts of Lagena radicicola Vanterp. & Ledingham from Nova Scotia west to Alberta in Canada (Barr and Désaulniers 1990). Rhizophydium graminis was reported on the species in Ontario (Ginns 1986). Other root rot fungi in Canada include Ligniera pilorum Fron & Gaillet in Ontario; Pythium spp in British Columbia; and P. polymastum Drechsler in Saskatchewan. The saprophytic soil-borne pathogen Rhizoctonia solani Kühn, reported from Washington State, causes lesions on the collet between the stem and root, progressing from collar to root rot, and also attacks seeds [United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 1960]. Aphanomyces euteiches Drechsler was reported in New Zealand and Humicola grisea Traaen in Poland.

Rusts

White blister rusts caused by the parasitic fungus Albugo candida (Pers.) Kuntze (= A. cruciferarum (DC) A. Gray; Cystopus candidus (Pers.) Lév.) result in white or cream-coloured sori found on leaves, shoots and flowering parts of C. bursa-pastoris (Heller and Thines 2009; Mirzaee and Sajedi 2015). The species is the type host of race 4 of this fungus, and is among Brassicaceae that became resistant to their particular race of A. candida following transfer of the white rust resistance gene WWR4 from Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (Borhan et al. 2008, 2010). Virulent isolates from C. bursa-pastoris cells revealed very rapid spread and development of this fungus, including sporangia production in the absence of host cell necrosis (Soylu et al. 2003). In Canada, A. candida has been reported in British Columbia and Saskatchewan (Ginns 1986) and is common on all continents. A new species, A. koreana Y.J.Choi, Thines & H.D.Shin infecting C. bursa-pastoris was identified in Korea (Choi et al. 2007). A case of white blister rust caused by A. candida and A. koreana has been reported in Iran (Mirzaee and Sajedi 2015). The rust Puccinia aristidae Tracy is found on C. bursa-pastoris in several US states. Double infection by A. candida and Hyaloperonospora parasitica (= Peronospora) has been observed in diseased inflorescences of C. bursa-pastoris (Sansome and Sansome 1974) and may reduce the number of individuals in established stands and any recruitment for future generations (Alexander and Burdon 1984). Of the 17 races or pathotypes of A. candida, races Ac1 to Ac6 were found to be specific to the host C. bursa-pastoris in Australia (Petkowski et al. 2010). A strain of A. candida isolated from C. bursa-pastoris in western Australia was pathogenic on Brassica juncea (L.) Czern., but the B. juncea isolate was not pathogenic on C. bursa-pastoris (Kaur et al. 2011).

Stem disease

Colletotrichum dematium (Pers.) Grove was reported to have infected C. bursa-pastoris in Saskatchewan (Ginns 1986). In the United Kingdom, C. bursa-pastoris was among weed hosts of crown and stem rot diseases caused by Fusarium spp., particularly F. avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc., pathogenic to seedlings of winter wheat (Jenkinson and Parry 1994). Seedling blight for C. bursa-pastoris was caused by F. culmorum (W.C.Sm.) Sacc. in Poland.

(ii) .

Bacteria

Wild hosts, including C. bursa-pastoris, of Spiroplasma citri, a bacterial causative agent of brittle root disease of horseradish (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn. Mey. & Sherb.), were found to be sources for transmission of the bacterium by the beet leafhopper (Circulifer tenellus Baker) in Illinois (O’Hayer et al. 1984). The bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris was recovered from C. bursa-pastoris in cruciferous crop fields in Oklahoma, and was found to be the only weed that harboured bacterial pathogens in those fields (Zhao et al. 2002). The survey indicated that C. bursa-pastoris was not only an alternative host for this pathogen but might also play a role in the secondary disease cycle of black rot and leaf spot of cruciferous field crops. Other causal agents of bacterial leaf spots were not recovered from C. bursa-pastoris. In California almond orchards, C. bursa-pastoris has been infected by the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa, a cause of almond leaf scorch, usually transmitted by hemipteran vectors such as the blue-green sharpshooter Graphocephala atropunctata Signoret (Shapland et al. 2006). The bacterium Rhizobacter dauci, the causal agent of carrot bacterial gall, produced galls on the roots of a wide range of host species, including C. bursa-pastoris, in Japan (Kawarazaki et al. 2012).

Lee et al. (2016) identified nine species of spore-forming bacilli bacteria from fresh samples of C. bursa-pastoris in South Korea: Bacillus drentensis, B. acidiceler, B. aryabhattai, B. asahii, B. firmus, B. pseudomycoides, B. psychrodurans, B. simplex, Bacillus sp., Paenibacillus lautus, P. barcinonensis, P. tundra, and Brevibacillus reuszeri. These bacteria are ubiquitously present in nature, their endospores are generally found in soil and all isolates are able to produce enzymes that are responsible for food spoilage and can make the consumption of plant materials a food safety concern (Lee et al. 2016).

(iii) .

Viruses

Certain strains of the aphid-transmitted beet western yellows virus (BWYV) caused severe yellowing and stunting of infected C. bursa-pastoris (Falk and Duffus 1984; Sanger et al. 1994). Severe symptoms following inoculation with the BWYV strain ST9 did not arise from any change in confinement of the infection to the phloem. In Great Britain, C. bursa-pastoris was susceptible to BWYV and to beet mild yellowing virus (BMYV), but not to beet yellows virus (BYV) (Stevens et al. 1994). When a California legume isolate of BWYV was purified from C. bursa-pastoris, root tissue yielded four times as much as the shoots (D’Arcy et al. 1983). The satellite RNA of Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus-RPV is transmitted to C. bursa-pastoris by aphids, but only in conjunction with BWYV and its ST9 strain (Rasochová et al. 1997). A very small percentage of C. bursa-pastoris plants were infected by BWYV in sugarbeet seed crops in Oregon (Hampton et al. 1999). BMYV is able to overwinter on C. bursa-pastoris, and the latter is susceptible to most strains of beet yellowing viruses except for a strain of BMYV now classified as a new species, beet chlorosis virus (BChV) (Stevens et al. 2005) and the BMYV-2ITB isolate (Lemaire et al. 1995). A German isolate of BMYV used for both agrinoculation and aphid transmission of the virus produced systemic infection of C. bursa-pastoris by both methods (Stephan and Maiss 2006). Visible symptoms included both yellowing and leaf-rolling of older leaves. Artificially infected C. bursa-pastoris is able to transmit beet mosaic virus through the aphid, Myzus ascalonicus Doncaster (Semal 1956). As one of the more abundant weeds in areas adjacent to potato and onion crops in New York State, C. bursa-pastoris is host to the potato virus Y (PVY) and the potato leafroll virus (PLRV), both transmitted to crops by aphids, particularly the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Selzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) (Smith et al. 2012). Several genotypes of that aphid are common on C. bursa-pastoris in Greece (Blackman et al. 2007). In contaminated soil, C. bursa-pastoris is among alternative hosts for the beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BANYVV), the beet soil-borne virus (BASBV) and spores of their protozoan vector Polymyxa betae Keskin (Mouhanna et al. 2008). Capsella bursa-pastoris is a potential alternative host of the blackberry yellow vein associated virus (BYVaV) in the United States (Poudel et al. 2013). In California lettuce-growing areas, C. bursa-pastoris is among crops and weeds infected by the thrips-transmitted disease Impatiens necrotic spot virus (INSV); and as a winter annual, is a probable virus reservoir and source of primary inoculum for lettuce planted in early spring and for maintaining the virus between summer- and fall-planted crops (Kuo et al. 2014). Curly top disease (CTD) caused by viruses in the genus Curtovirus and spread by leafhoppers, severely infects C. bursa-pastoris causing stunted growth and distorted and twisted leaves and stems (Chen and Gilbertson 2009; Chen et al. 2011). Capsella bursa-pastoris is also susceptible to the tobacco rattle virus TRV (genus Tobravirus), which is spread by nematodes, species Trichodorus and Paratrichodorus (Iannetta et al. 2010). TRV has a well-known persistent history of causing economic damage to potato tubers which appears as arcs of discolouration referred to as spraing.

(iv) .

Other diseases

The beet leafhopper Circulifer tenellus (Baker) (Cicadellidae) transmits the phytoplasma BLTVA, the causal agent of the potato purple top disease, to both crops and several weeds, including C. bursa-pastoris (Munyaneza et al. 2006). The causal agent of clubroot disease on Brassica spp., Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin (Rhizaria) has been found on C. bursa-pastoris in oilseed rape fields in China, with an incidence of 6.2% and 100% respectively. Rapid spread of the disease in both the weed and a cabbage crop was observed (Kim et al. 2011; Ren et al. 2014).

(c) .

Higher plant parasites

Capsella bursa-pastoris is host of the field cow-wheat, Melampyrum arvense L., a hemi-parasite which attaches itself by haustoria to the roots of the host plant to obtain additional moisture and nutrients (Lechowski 1995). There are unconfirmed data from Bulgarian floras that Capsella is a host of the parasitic species Orobanche nana Noë (Stoyanov 2005). A greenhouse study done in Dijon, France showed that Phelipanche ramosa (L.) Pomel, a parasitic plant, had a low number of successful infections relative to other species in the study (Moreau et al. 2016).

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful for the generous help we received from the following herbarium curatorial staff: Shannon Anescio at the Department of Agriculture, Ottawa (DAO), Hugo Cota-Sánchez and Denver Falconer at the W.P. Fraser Herbarium, Richard Caners at the Royal Alberta Museum, Kristi Dysievick at the Claude Garton Herbarium, and Natalie Iwanycki and Joseph Mentlik at the Royal Botanic Gardens herbarium. We thank Jessica Hsiung from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) for creating the beautiful illustrations of this species featured in Fig. 1. Furthermore, we thank Matthieu Brouard for initial work gathering references for this paper. We are very grateful for the input from two anonymous reviewers on an earlier version of the manuscript to help generate a much better overview of this well-studied plant.

References

1.

Aksoy, A., and Gemici, Y. 1993. Contribution a 1' etude de la flore du Mahmud dagi (Kemalpasa-Izmir) I. J. Faculty Sci. Ege Univiersity, 15: 43–53. Google Scholar

2.

Aksoy, A., Dixon, J.M., and Hale, W.H.G. 1998. Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medikus (Thlaspi bursa-pastoris L., Bursa bursa-pastoris (L.) shull, Bursa pastoris (L.) Weber). J. Ecol. 86: 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00260.xGoogle Scholar

3.

Aksoy, A., Hale, W.H., and Dixon, J.M. 1999. Towards a simplified taxonomy of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. (Brassicaceae). Watsonia, 22: 243–250. Google Scholar

4.

Al-Khatib, K., Libbey, C., and Boydston, R. 1997. Weed suppression with Brassica green manure crops in green pea. Weed Sci. 45: 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500093139Google Scholar

5.

Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2012. A generic and tribal synopsis of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae). Taxon, 61: 931–954. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615002Google Scholar

6.

Al-Snafi, A.E. 2015. The chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of Capsella bursa-pastoris - A review. Int. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 5: 76–81. Google Scholar

7.

Alex, J.F., and Switzer, C.M. 1976. Ontario weeds: Description, illustrations and keys to their identification. Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario. Google Scholar

8.

Alex, J.F., 1992. Ontario Weeds, Publication 505. Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Queen's Printer, Toronto. Google Scholar

9.

Alexander, H.M., and Burdon, J.J. 1984. The effect of disease induced by Albugo candida (white rust) and Peronospora parasitica (downy mildew) on the survival and reproduction of Capsella bursa-pastoris (shepherd's purse). Oecologia, 64: 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00379127. pmid:28311445Google Scholar

10.

Almquist, E. 1923. Studien tiber Capsella bursa-pastoris II. Acta Horti Bergiani, 7: 41–95. Google Scholar

11.

Almquist, E. 1929. Zur Artbildung in der freien Natur. Acta Horti Bergiani, 9: 37–76. Google Scholar

12.

Andreasen, C., and Stryhn, H. 2008. Increasing weed flora in Danish arable fields and its importance for biodiversity. Weed Res. 48: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2008.00603.xGoogle Scholar

13.

Barr, D.J., and Désaulniers, N.L. 1990. The life cycle Lagena radicola, an oomycetous parasite of wheat roots. Can. J. Bot. 68: 2112–2118. https://doi.org/10.1139/b90-276Google Scholar

14.

Baskin, J.M., and Baskin, C. 1989. Germination responses of buried seeds of Capsella bursa-pastoris exposed to seasonal temperature changes. Weed Res. 29: 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1989.tb00860.xGoogle Scholar

15.

Baskin, C.C., and Baskin, J.M. 2006. The natural history of soil seed banks of arable land. Weed Sci. 54: 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-05-034r.1Google Scholar

16.

Baskin, C.C., Milberg, P., Andersson, L., and Baskin, J.M. 2004. Germination ecology of seeds of the annual weeds Capsella bursa-pastoris and Descurainia sophia originating from high northern latitudes. Weed Res. 44: 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00373.xGoogle Scholar

17.

Begg, G.S., Wishart, J., Young, M.W., Squire, G.R., and Iannetta, P.P.M. 2012. Genetic structure among arable populations of Capsella bursa-pastoris is linked to functional traits and in-field conditions. Ecography, 35: 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587. 2011.07030.xGoogle Scholar

18.

Benvenuti, S. 2007. Natural weed seed burial: effect of soil texture, rain and seed characteristics. Seed Sci. Res. 17: 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0960258507782752Google Scholar

19.

Bischoff, R., Vogl, C.R., Ivemever, S., Klarer, F., Meier, B., and Hamgurder, M., and, Walkenhorst. 2016. Plant and natural product based homemade remedies manufactured and used by farmers of six central Swiss cantons to treat livestock. Livest. Sci. 189: 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.05.003Google Scholar

20.

Bitarafan, Z., and Andreasen, C. 2020. Seed retention of ten common weed species at oat harvest reveals the potential for harvest weed seed control. Weed Res. 60: 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12438Google Scholar

21.

Bitterlich, I., and Upadhyaya, M.K. 1990. Leaf surface ultrastructure and susceptibility to ammonium nitrate injury. Can. J. Bot. 68: 1911–1915. https://doi.org/10.1139/b90-251Google Scholar

22.

Bitterlich, I., Upadhyaya, M.K., and Shibairo, S.I. 1996. Weed control in cole crops and onion (Allium cepa) using ammonium nitrate. Weed Sci. 44: 952–958. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500094984Google Scholar

23.

Blackman, R.L., Malarky, G., Margaritopoulos, J.T., and Tsitsipis, J.A., 2007. Distribution of common genotypes of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Greece, in relation to life cycle and host plant. Bull. Entomol. Res. 97: 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007485307004907. pmid:17524157Google Scholar

24.

Borhan, M.H., Gunn, N., Cooper, A., Gulden, S., Tör, M., Rimmer, S.R., and Holub, E.B. 2008. WRR4 encodes a TIR-NB-LRR protein that confers broad-spectrum white rust resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana to four physiological races of Albugo candida. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 21: 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-21-6-0757. pmid:18624640Google Scholar

25.

Borhan, M.H., Holub, E.B., Kindrachuk, C., Omidi, M., Bozorgmanesh-Frad, G., and Rimmer, S.R. 2010. WRR4, a broad-spectrum TIR-NB-LRR gene from Arabidopsis thaliana that confers white rust resistance in transgenic oilseed brassica crops. Mol. Plant Pathol. 11: 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00599.x. pmid:20447277Google Scholar

26.

Bosbach, K., Hurka, H., and Haase, R. 1982. The soil seed bank of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Cruciferae): Its influence on population variability. Flora, 172: 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0367-2530(17)31310-5Google Scholar

27.

Bourdöt, G.W., Hurrell, G.A., and Saville, D.J. 1998. Weed flora of cereal crops in Canterbury, New Zealand. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 26: 233–47. Google Scholar

28.

Braun, U. 1995: A monograph of Cercosporella, Ramularia and allied genera (phytopathogenic Hyphomycetes). Vol. 1. IHW-Verlag, Eching. Google Scholar

29.

Brooks, R.R. 1987. Serpentine and its Vegetation. Croom Helnm, London. Google Scholar

30.

Bussmann, R.W., Batsatsashvili, K., Kikvidze, Z., Khajoei Nasab, F., Ghorbani, A., Paniagua-Zambrana, N.Y. et al. 2019. Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik B. Pages 1–10 in K. Batsatsashvili, Z. Kikvidze, and R. Bussmann, eds. Ethnobotany of Mountain Regions. Springer, Cham. Google Scholar

31.

Chawla, A., Singh, Y.P., Singh, P., Rawat, S., Das, S., and Singh, N. 2011. Ecological significance of mycotrophy in some tropical weeds. Trop. Ecol. 52: 303–310. Google Scholar

32.

Chen, L.F., and Gilbertson, R.L. 2009. Curtovirus-cucurbit interaction: acquisition host plays a role in leafhopper transmission in a host-dependent manner. Phytopathology, 99: 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-99-1-0101. pmid:19055441Google Scholar

33.

Chen, L.F., Vivoda, E., and Gilbertson, R.L. 2011. Genetic diversity in curtoviruses: a highly divergent strain of Beet mild curly top virus associated with an outbreak of curly top disease in pepper in Mexico. Arch. Virol. 156: 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-010-0884-9. pmid:21193937Google Scholar

34.

Choi, Y.-J., Shin, H.-D., Hong, S.-B., and Thines, M. 2007. Morphological and molecular discrimination among Albugo candida materials infecting Capsella bursa - pastoris world-wide. Fungal Divers, 27: 11–34. Google Scholar

35.

Choi, W.J., Kim, S.K., Park, H.K., Sohn, U.D., and Kim, W. 2014. Anti-inflammatory and anti-superbacterial properties of sulforaphane from shepherd's purse. Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 18: 33–39. https://doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2014.18.1.33. pmid:24634594Google Scholar

36.

Choi, B., Jeong, H., and Kim, E. 2019. Phenotypic plasticity of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae) and its effect on fitness in response to temperature and soil moisture. Plant Species Biol. 34: 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12227Google Scholar

37.

Cici, S.Z.H., and Van Acker, R.C. 2009. A review of the recruitment biology of winter annual weeds in Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 89: 575–589. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps08131Google Scholar

38.

Cici, S.Z.H., and Van Acker, R.C. 2011. Relative freezing tolerance of facultative winter annual weeds. Can. J. Plant Sci. 91: 759–763. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2010-001Google Scholar

39.

Conn, J.S., and Deck, R.E. 1995. Seed viability and dormancy of 17 weed species after 9.7 years of burial in Alaska. Weed Sci. 43: 583–585. Google Scholar

40.

Conn, J.S., and Werdin-Pfisterer, N.R. 2010. Variation in seed viability and dormancy of 17 weed species after 24.7 years of burial: The concept of buried seed safe sites. Weed Sci. 58: 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-d-09-00084.1Google Scholar

41.

Connors, I.L. 1967. An annotated index of plant diseases in Canada; and fungi recorded on plants in Alaska, Canada and Greenland. Res. Branch Canada Dept. Agric. 1251: 1–381. Google Scholar

42.

Constantinescu, O., and Fatehi, J. 2002. Peronospora-like fungi (Chromisia, Peronosporales) parasitic on Brassicaceae and related hosts. Nova Hedwigia, 74: 291–338. https://doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2002/0074-0291Google Scholar

43.

Cook, R.T., Bailey, S.E.R., and McCrohan, C.R. 1996. Slug preferences for winter wheat cultivars and common agricultural weeds. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 866–872. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404957Google Scholar

44.

Coquillat, M. 1951. Sur les plantes les plus communes a´ la surface du globe. Bull. Mensuel Soc. Linn. Lyon. 20: 165–170 https://doi.org/10.3406/linly.1951.7425Google Scholar

45.

Crawley, M.J., 1990. Rabbit grazing, plant competition and seedling recruitment in acid grassland. J. Appl. Ecol. 27: 803–820. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404378Google Scholar

46.

Cui, H.I., Li, X., Wang, G., Wang, J., Wei, S., and Cao, H. 2012. Acetolactate synthase proline (197) mutations confer tribenuron-methyl resistance in Capsella bursa-pastoris populations from China. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 102: 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.01.007Google Scholar

47.

D'Arcy, C.L., Hewings, A.D., Burnett, P.A., and Jedlinski, H. 1983. Comparative purification of two luteoviruses. Phytopathology, 73: 755–759. Google Scholar

48.

Damgaard, C., Mathiassen, S.K., and Kudsk, P. 2008. Modeling effects of herbicide drift on the competitive interactions between weeds. Environ. Toxicol. Chemi. 27: 1302–1308. https://doi.org/10.1897/07-267.1Google Scholar

49.

Darbyshire, S.J., Favreau, M., and Murray, M., and Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 2000. Common and scientific names of weeds in Canada: Noms populaires et scientifiques des plantes nuisibles du Canada. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada = Agriculture et agroalimentaire Canada, Ottawa. pp. 24. Google Scholar

50.

Darbyshire, S.J. 2003. Inventory of Canadian agricultural weeds. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa. [Online]. Available from http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/A42-1002003E.pdf[24 June 2020] Google Scholar

51.

Defelice, M.S. 2001. Shepherd's-purse, Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medic. Weed Technol. 15: 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037x(2001)015[0892:sspcbp]2.0.co;2Google Scholar

52.

Demars, B.G., and Boerner, R.E.J. 1994. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization in Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae). Am. Midl. Nat. 132: 377–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2426593Google Scholar

53.

Demars, B.G., and Boerner, R.E.J. 1995. Arbuscular myccorhizal development in three crucifers. Mycorrhiza, 5: 405–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00213440Google Scholar

54.

Deng, W., Hallett, P.D., Jeng, D.S., Squire, G.R., Toorop, P.E., and Iannetta, P.P.M. 2015. The effect of natural seed coatings of Capsella bursa-pastoris L. Medic. (shepherd's purse) on soil-water retention, stability and hydraulic conductivity. Plant Soil. 387: 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2281-8Google Scholar

55.

Dillard, H.R., Bellinder, R.R., and Shah, D.A. 2004. Integrated management of weeds and diseases in a cabbage cropping system. Crop Prot. 23: 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-2194(03) 00172-8Google Scholar

56.

Dirzo, R., and Harper, J.L. 1980. Experimental studies on slug-plant interactions II. The effect of grazing by slugs on high density monocultures of Capsella bursa-pastoris and Poa annua. J. Ecol. 68: 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259471Google Scholar

57.

Douglas, G.M., Gos, G., Steige, K.A., Salcedo, A., Holm, K., Josephs, E.B., et al. 2015. Hybrid origins and the earliest stages of diploidization in the highly successful recent polyploid Capsella bursa-pastoris. Proc, Natl. Acad. Sci. 112: 2806–2811. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412277112Google Scholar

58.

Duke, J.A. 2002. Handbook of medicinal herbs. 2nd ed. CRC Press, New York. 870 pp. Google Scholar

59.

El-Habibi, A.M., and Youssef, M.M. 1981. Contribution to the auto-ecology of three Cruciferous species. Journa1 of College of Science, University of Riyadh, 12: 315–328. Google Scholar

60.

Ellenberg, H. 1988. Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. 4th ed. Cambridge. pp. 626. Google Scholar

61.

Eschmann-Grupe, G., Laufkötter, D., and Hurka, H. 1990. Lichtund temperature inflüsse auf die intraspezifische variation der flavonoid profile bei Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.). Med. Verh. GfÖ 19: 82–86. Google Scholar

62.

Facciola, S. 1990. Cornucopia—a source book of edible plants. Kampong Publications, Vista. Google Scholar

63.

Fahey, J.W., Haristoy, X., Dolan, P.M., Kensler, T.W., Sscholtus, I., Stephenson, K.K., et al. 2002. Sulfurophane inhibits extracellular, intracellular, and antibiotic-resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori and prevents benzo[a]pyrene-induced stomach tumors. Proc, Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 99: 7610–7615. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.112203099Google Scholar

64.

Falk, B.W., and Duffus, J.E. 1984. Identification of small single- and double-stranded RNAs associated with severe symptoms in beet western yellows virus-infected Capsella bursa-pastoris. Phytopathology, 74: 1224–1229. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-74-1224Google Scholar

65.

Farr, D.F., and Rossman, A.Y. 2020. Fungal databases, Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, ARS, USDA. [Online]. Available from http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases[24 Jul 2020]. Google Scholar

66.

Fennimore, S.A., and Jackson, L.E. 2003. Organic amendment and tillage effects on vegetable field weed emergence and seedbanks. Weed Technol. 17: 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037x(2003)017[0042:oaateo]2.0.co;2Google Scholar

67.

Franczuk, J., Kosterna, E., and Zaniewicz-Bajkowska, A. 2010. Weed control effects on different types of cover-crop mulches. Acta Agric. Scand. B Soil. Plant Sci. 60: 472–479. Google Scholar

68.

Frank, T., and Friedli, J. 1999. Laboratory food choice trials to explore the potential of common weeds to reduce slug feeding on oilseed rape. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 17: 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.1999.9754821Google Scholar

69.

Frankton, C., and Mulligan, G.A. 1987. Weeds of Canada. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, ON. Publ. A22-83/1986E. 143 p. Google Scholar

70.

Freyman, S., Brookes, V.R., and Hall, J.W. 1992. Effect of planting pattern on intra-row competition between cabbage and shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris). Can. J. Plant Sci. 72: 1393–1396. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps92-172Google Scholar

71.

Gabryś, B., and Pawluk, M. 1999. Acceptability of different species of Brassicaceae as hosts for the cabbage aphid. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91: 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458. 1999.00471.xGoogle Scholar

72.

Gange, A.C., and Brown, V.K. 1989. Effects of root herbivory by an insect on a foliar-feeding species, mediated through changes in the host plant. Oecologia, 81: 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00377007. pmid:28312154Google Scholar

73.

Gerard, J. 1633. The herball or generall historie of plantes. Very much enlarged and amended by Thomas Johnson. Facsimile reprint 1975, Dover Puśblications Inc., New York, NY. 1630 pp. Google Scholar

74.

Gerdeman, J.W. 1968. Vesicular-Arbuscular mycorrhiza and plant growth. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 6: 397–418. Google Scholar

75.

Ginns, J.H. 1986. Compendium of plant disease and decay fungi in Canada. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada Publication 1813. Ottawa, ON. 416 p. Google Scholar

76.

Gleissl, W., Bachthaler, G., and Hoffmann, G.M. 1989. Investigations on the suitability of weeds of various geographic origins as hosts of the sugar-beet nematode Heterodera schachtii Schmidt. Weed Res. 29: 221–228. [In German, English summary] https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1989. tb00862.xGoogle Scholar

77.

Goun, E.A., Petrichenko, V.M., Solodnikov, S.U., Suhinina, T.V., Kline, M.A., Cunningham, G., et al. 2002. Anticancer and antithrombin activity of Russian plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 81: 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00116-2. pmid:12127234Google Scholar

78.

Gray, A. 1848. A manual of the botany of the northern United States, from New England to Wisconsin and south to Ohio and Pennsylvania inclusive, (the mosses and liverworts by Wm. S. Sullivant), arranged according to the natural system. J. Munroe, Boston. Google Scholar

79.

Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G., and Hunt, R. 2014. Comparative plant ecology: A functional approach to common British species. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. Google Scholar

80.

Groh, H. 1947. Canadian weed survey, fourth report 1945. Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, ON. 56 p. Google Scholar

81.

Grosso, C., Vinholes, J., Silva, L.R., Guedes de Pinho, P., Gonçalves, R.F., Valentao, P., et al. 2011. Chemical composition and biological screening of Capsella bursa-pastoris. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 21: 635–644. Google Scholar

82.

Hallett, R.H. 2007. Host plant susceptibility to the swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 1335–1343. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/100.4.1335. pmid:17849887Google Scholar

83.

Hameister, S., Neuffer, B., and Bleeker, W. 2009. Genetic differentiation and reproductive isolation of a naturally occurring floral homeotic mutant within a wild-type population of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae). Mol. Ecol. 18: 2659–2667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04216.x. pmid:19457178Google Scholar

84.

Hameister, S., Nutt, P., Theißen, G., and Neuffer, B. 2013. Mapping a floral trait in Shepherds purse–‘Stamenoid petals’ in natural populations of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. Flora, 208: 641–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2013.09.008Google Scholar

85.

Hampton, R.O., Keller, K.E., and Burt, G.E., 1999. Incidence and effects of beet western yellows virus in Western Oregon sugarbeet seed crops. J. Sugar Beet Res. 36: 15–32. https://doi.org/10.5274/jsbr.36.1.15Google Scholar

86.

Hanzlik, K., and Gerowitt, B., 2012. Occurrence and distribution of important weed species in German winter oilseed rape fields. J. Plant Dis. Protect. 119: 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03356429Google Scholar

87.

Harker, K.N., Baron, V.S., Chanasyki, D.S., Naeth, M.A., and Stevenson, F.C. 2000. Grazing intensity effects on weed populations in annual and perennial pasture systems. Weed Sci. 48: 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0231:gieowp] 2.0.co;2Google Scholar

88.

Hartwell, J.L. 1982. Plants used against cancer: a survey. Facsimile reprint of Lloydia 30–34, 1967–1971. Quarterman Publications, Lawrence, Mass., USA. 710 pp. Google Scholar

89.

Hawes, C., Begg, G.S., Squire, G.R., and Iannetta, P.P.M. 2005. Individuals as the basic accounting unit in studies of ecosystem function: functional diversity in shepherd's purse, Capsella. Oikos, 109: 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005. 13853.xGoogle Scholar

90.

Heap, I. 2021. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. [Online]. Available from www.weedscience.org[7 Jul. 2021]. Google Scholar

91.

Heller, A., and Thines, M. 2009. Evidence for the importance of enzymatic digestion of epidermal walls during subepidermal sporulation and pustule opening in white blister rusts (Albuginaceae). Mycol. Res. 113: 657–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2009.01.009. pmid:19484808Google Scholar

92.

Hill, E.C., Renner, K.A., and Sprague, C.L. 2014. Henbit (Lamium amplexicaule), common chickweed (Stellaria media), shepherd's-purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris), and field pennycress (Thlaspi arvense): Fecundity, seed dispersal, dormancy, and emergence. Weed Sci. 62: 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-d-13-00074.1Google Scholar

93.

Hiltbrunner, J., Jeanneret, P., Liedgens, M., Stamp, P., and Streit, B. 2007. Response of weed communities to legume living mulches in winter wheat. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193: 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037x.2007.00250.xGoogle Scholar

94.

Hintz, M., Bartholmes, C., Nutt, P., Ziermann, J., and Hameister, S. 2006. Catching a ‘hopeful monster’: shepherd’s purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris) as a model system to study the evolution of flower development. J. Exp. Bot. 57:3531–3542. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl158. pmid:17018770Google Scholar

95.

Hitchcock, C.L., and Cronquist, A. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest: An illustrated manual. Seattle: University of Washington Press. pp. 146–157. Google Scholar

96.

Holmgren, P.K., Holmgren, N.H., and Barnett, L.C. (eds.). 1990. Index herbariorum. Part 1:The herbaria of the world. 8th ed. New York Botanical Garden, New York, NY. 693 p. Google Scholar

97.

Hultén, E., and Fries, M. 1986. Atlas of North European vascular plants. Part I–III, maps and commentaries. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein, Germany. 1172 pp. Google Scholar

98.

Hur, J., Yoo, M., Shin, D.-B., and Lee, S. 2013. Inhibition of nitric oxide production corresponds to the sulforaphane content in Korean shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris) and related species in BV-2 cell. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 22: 1085–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-013-0187-5Google Scholar

99.

Hurka, H., and Benneweg, M. 1979. Patterns of seed size variation in populations of the common weed Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae). Biol. Zentralbl. 98: 699–709. Google Scholar

100.

Hurka, H., and Haase, R. 1982. Seed ecology of Capsella-bursa-pastoris (Cruciferae) - dispersal mechanism and the soil seed bank. Flora, 172: 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0367-2530(17)31309-9Google Scholar

101.

Hurka, H., and Neuffer, B. 1991. Colonizing success in plants: Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity in life history traits in Capsella bursapastoris. Pages 77–96 in G. Esser, and D. Overdieck, eds. Modern Ecology: Basic and Applied Aspects. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Google Scholar

102.

Hurka, H., and Neuffer, B. 1997. Evolutionary processes in the genus Capsella (Brassicaceae). Plant Syst, Evol. 206: 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00987954Google Scholar

103.

Hurka, H., Krauss, R., Reiner, T., and Wöhrmann, K. 1976. Das blühverhalten von capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae)/the flowering behaviour of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 125: 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00986774Google Scholar

104.

Hurka, H., Freundner, S., Brown, A.H., and Plantholt, U. 1989. Aspartate aminotransferase isozymes in the genus Capsella (Brassicaceae): subcellular location, gene duplication, and polymorphism. Biochem. Genet. 27: 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00563019. pmid:2712824Google Scholar

105.

Hurka, H., Friesen, N., German, D.A., Franzke, A., and Neuffer, B. 2012. ‘Missing link’species Capsella orientalis and Capsella thracica elucidate evolution of model plant genus Capsella (Brassicaceae). Mol. Ecol. 21: 1223–1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05460.x. pmid:22288429Google Scholar

106.

Iannetta, P.P.M., Begg, G., Hawes, C., Young, M., Russell, J., and Squire, G.R. 2007. Variation in Capsella (shepherd's purse): An example of intraspecific functional diversity. Physiol. Plant. 129: 542–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00833.xGoogle Scholar

107.

Iannetta, P.P.M., Begg, G.S., Valentine, T.A., and Wishart, J. 2010. Sustainable disease control using weeds as indicators: Capsella bursa-pastoris and tobacco rattle virus: Weeds and sustainable disease control. Weed Res. 50: 511–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00816.xGoogle Scholar

108.

Jenkinson, N.P., and Parry, D.W., 1994. Isolation of Fusarium species from common broad-leaved weeds and their pathogenicity to winter wheat. Mycol. Res. 98: 776–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0953-7562(09)81054-xGoogle Scholar

109.

Jin, T., Liu, J., Huan, Z., Wu, C., Bi, Y., and Wang, J. 2011. Molecular basis for resistance to tribenuron in shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 100: 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2011.03.005Google Scholar

110.

Johnson, W.G., Creech, J.E., and Mock, V.A. 2008. Role of winter annual weeds as alternative hosts for soybean cyst nematode. Crop Manag. 7: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1094/cm-2008-0701-01-rvGoogle Scholar

111.

Johnson, S.N., Staley, J.T., McLeod, F.A.L., and Hartley, S.E. 2011. Plant-mediated effects of soil invertebrates and summer drought on above-ground multitrophic interactions. J. Ecol. 99: 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01748.xGoogle Scholar

112.

Julié-Galau, S., Bellec, Y., Faure, J-D., and Tepfer, M. 2014. Evaluation of the potential for interspecific hybridization between Camelina sativa and related wild Brassicaceae in anticipation of field trials of GM camelina. Transgenic Res. 23: 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9722-7. pmid:23793580Google Scholar

113.

Kang, M.S. 1983. A study of variation of Capsella bursa- pastoris (L.) Medicus. Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 13: 77–88. Google Scholar

114.

Karley, A.J., Hawes, C., Iannetta, P.P.M., and Squire, G.R. 2008. Intraspecific variation in Capsella bursa-pastoris in plant quality traits for insect herbivores. Weed Res. 48: 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2007.00617.xGoogle Scholar

115.

Karley, A.J., Hawes, C., Valentine, T., Johnson, S., Toorop, P., Squire, G., et al. 2011. Can arable weeds contribute to ecosystem service provision? Functional diversity in shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.). Asp. Appl. Biol. 109: 31–38. Google Scholar

116.

Kasianov, A.S., Klepikova, A.V, Kulakovskiy, I.V., Evgeny, S., Fedotova, A.V., Besedina, E.G., et al. 2017. High-quality genome assembly of Capsella bursa-pastoris reveals asymmetry of regulatory elements at early stages of polyploid genome evolution. Plant J. 91: 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13563. pmid:28387959Google Scholar

117.

Kaur, P., Sivasithamparam, K., and Barbetti, M.J. 2011. Host range and phylogenetic relationships of Albugo candida from cruciferous hosts in western Australia, with special reference to Brassica juncea. Plant Dis. 95: 712–718. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-10-10-0765. pmid:30731906Google Scholar

118.

Kawarazaki, H., Goto, M., Kato, K., Kijima, T., and Takikawa, Y. 2012. Isolation and plant host range of Rhizobacter dauci, causal agent of carrot bacterial gall. Jpn. J. Phytopath. 78: 293–300. https://doi.org/10.3186/jjphytopath.78.293Google Scholar

119.

Kim, W.G., Lee, S.Y., Choi, H.W., Hong, S.K., and Lee, Y.K., 2011. Occurrence of clubroot on shepherd's-purse caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae. Mycobiology, 39: 233–234. https://doi.org/10.5941/myco.2011.39.3.233. pmid:22783109Google Scholar

120.

Kivilaan, A., and Bandurski, R.S., 1981. The one hundred-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. Am. J. Bot. 68: 1290–1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1981.tb07838.xGoogle Scholar

121.

Klimeš, P., and Saska, P. 2010. Larval and adult seed consumption affected by the degree of food specialization in Amara (Coleoptera: Carabidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 134: 659–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01463.xGoogle Scholar

122.

Konstantinović, B., and Blagojević, M., 2014. Weed seed distribution in the soil profile in extensive and intensive vineyards. Herbologia, 14: 16–22. Google Scholar

123.

Kozub, A., Wagner, D., Studinska-Sroka, E., and Bylka, W. 2012. Capsella bursa-pastoris – a common weed and little-known medicinal plant. Postepy Fitoterapii. 4: 250–253. [in Polish] Google Scholar

124.

Kumar, V., Brainard, D.C., and Bellinder, R.R. 2008. Suppression of Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii), shepherd's-purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris), and corn chamomile (Anthemis arvensis) by buckwheat residues: Role of nitrogen and fungal pathogens. Weed Sci. 56: 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-07-106.1Google Scholar

125.

Kuo, Y.-W., Gilbertson, R.L., Turini, T., Brennan, E.B., Smith, R.F., and Koike, S.T. 2014. Characterization and epidemiology of outbreaks of Impatiens necrotic spot virus on lettuce in coastal California. Plant Dis. 98: 1050–1059. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-07-13-0681-re. pmid:30708789Google Scholar

126.

Lariviere, A., Limeri, L.B., Meindl, G.A., and Traw, M.B. 2015. Herbivory and relative growth rates of Pieris rapae are correlated with host constitutive salicylic acid and flowering time. J. Chem. Ecol. 41: 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-015-0572-z. pmid:25893789Google Scholar

127.

Lechowski, Z., 1995. Element contents and guard cell physiology of the root hemiparasite Melampyrum arvense L. before and after attachment to the host plant. J. Plant Nutr. 18: 2551–2567. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169509365084Google Scholar

128.

Lee, K.E., Shin, J., Hong, I.S., Cho, N.P., and Cho, S.D., 2013. Effect of methanol extracts of Cnidium officinale Makino and Capsella bursa-pastoris on the apoptosis of HSC-2 human oral cancer cells. Exp. Ther. Med. 5: 789–792. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm. 2012.871. pmid:23403540Google Scholar

129.

Lee, W.J., Kim, H.B., and Kim, K.S. 2016. Isolation and characterization of spore-forming bacilli (SFB) from shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris): Characters of SFB from shepherd's purse. J. Food Sci. 81: M684–M691. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13231. pmid:26822957Google Scholar

130.

Leeson, J.Y., Thomas, A.G., Hall, L., Brenzil, C.A., Andrews, C.A., Brown, K.R., and Van Acker, R.C. 2005. Prairie Weed survey: cereal, oilseed and pulse crops 1970s to the 2000s. Weed Survey Series Publ. 05–1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, Saskatoon, SK. 395 pp. Google Scholar

131.

Lemaire, O., Herrbach, E., Stevens, M., Bouchery, Y., and Smith, H.G. 1995. Detection of sugar beet-infecting beet mild yellowing luteovirus isolates with a specific RNA probe. Phytopathology, 85: 1513–1518. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-85-1513Google Scholar

132.

Lin, P., Wu, L., Wei, D., Chen, H., Zhou, M., Yao, X., and Lin, J. 2016. Promoter analysis of cold-responsive (COR) gene from Capsella bursa-pastoris and expression character in response to low temperature. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 18: 346–352. https://doi.org/10.17957/ijab/15.0093Google Scholar

133.

Linde, M., Diel, S., and Neuffer, B., 2001. Flowering ecotypes of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.(Brassicaceae) analysed by a cosegregation of phenotypic characters (QTL) and molecular markers. Annals of Botany, 87(1): 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo. 2000.1308Google Scholar

134.

Lipecki, J. 1989. Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Med. another weed resistant to simazine. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 57: 187–189. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.1988.018Google Scholar

135.

Liu, Y., Lin, L., Jin, Q., and Zhu, X. 2015. Cadmium accumulation and tolerance in the Cd-accumulator Capsella bursa-pastoris. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, 34: 663–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12037Google Scholar

136.

Marshall, E.J.P., Brown, V.K., Boatman, N.D., Lutman, P.J.W., Squire, G.R., and Ward, L.K. 2003. The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Res. 43: 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00326.xGoogle Scholar

137.

Martin, S.L., Sauder, C.A., James, T., Cheung, K.W., Razeq, F.M., Kron, P., and Hall, L. 2015. Sexual hybridization between Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) medik (♂) and Camelina sativa (L.) crantz (♀) (Brassicaceae). Plant Breed. 134: 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12245Google Scholar

138.

Mazzio, E.A., and Soliman, K.F.A. 2009. In vitro screening for the tumoricidal properties of international medicinal plants. Phytother. Res. 23: 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2636. pmid:18844256Google Scholar

139.

McKenzie, R.A., Carmichael, A.M., Schibrowski, M.L., Duigan, S.A., Gibson, J.A., and Taylor, J.D. 2009. Sulfur-associated polioencephalomalacia in cattle grazing plants from the Family Brassicaceae. Aust. Vet. J. 87: 27–32. Google Scholar

140.

Medve, R.J. 1983. The mycorrhizal status of the Cruciferae. Am. Midl. Nat. 109: 406–408. https://doi.org/10.2307/2425422Google Scholar

141.

Mennan, H., Ngouajio, M., Kaya, E., and Isik, D. 2009. Weed management in organically grown kale using alternative cover cropping systems. Weed Technol. 23: 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1614/wt-08-119.1Google Scholar

142.

Milberg, P., and Hallgren, E. 2004. Yield loss due to weeds in cereals and its large-scale variability in Sweden. Field Crops Res. 86: 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2003.08.006Google Scholar

143.

Millspaugh, C.F. 1974. American Medicinal Plants. Dover Publications. New York. Google Scholar

144.

Mirzaee, M.R., and Sajedi, S. 2015. First confirmed report of white blister rust disease caused by Albugo candida on Capsella bursa-pastoris in Iran. J. Plant Pathol. 97: S71 Google Scholar

145.

Monzeglio, U., and Stoll, P. 2005. Spatial patterns and species performances in experimental plant communities. Oecologia, 145: 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0168-3. pmid:16001215Google Scholar

146.

Moreau, D., Gibot-Leclerc, S., Girardin, A., Pointurier, O., Reibel, C., Strbik, F., et al. 2016. Trophic relationships between the parasitic plant species Phelipanche ramosa (L.) and different hosts depending on host phenological stage and host growth rate. Front. Plant Sci. 7: 1033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01033. pmid:27468293Google Scholar

147.

Morgan, O.D. 1971. A study of four weed hosts of Sclerotinia species in alfalfa fields. Plant Disease Reporter, 55: 1097–1089. Google Scholar

148.

Moser, B.R., and Vaughn, S.F. 2012. Efficacy of fatty acid profile as a tool for screening feedstocks for biodiesel production. Biomass Bioenerg. 37: 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011. 12.038Google Scholar

149.

Mostafa, A.M., Lowery, D.T., Jensen, L.B.M., and Deglow, E.K. 2011. Host plant suitability and feeding preferences of the grapevine pest Abagrotis orbis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ. Entomol. 40: 1458–1464. https://doi.org/10.1603/en11049. pmid:22217761Google Scholar

150.

Mouhanna, A.M., Langen, G., and Schlosser, E. 2008. Weeds as alternative hosts for BSBV, BNYVV, and the vector Polymyxa betae (German isolate). J. Plant Dis. Prot. 115: 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03356263Google Scholar

151.

Mukherjee, D.K., Kiewitt, I., and Hurka, H. 1984. Lipid content and fatty acid composition of seeds of Capsella species from different geographical locations. Phytochemistry, 23: 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(84)83088-5Google Scholar

152.

Muller, F.J., Dosdall, L.M., Mason, P.G., and Kuhlmann, U. 2011. Larval phenologies and parasitoids of two seed-feeding weevils associated with hoary cress and shepherd's purse (Brassicaceae) in Europe. Can. Entomol. 143: 399–410. https://doi.org/10.4039/n11-020Google Scholar

153.

Mulligan, G.A. 1957. Chromosome numbers of Canadian weeds. I. Can. J. Bot. 35: 779–789. https://doi.org/10.1139/b57-064Google Scholar

154.

Mulligan, G.A. 1984. Chromosome numbers of some plants native and naturalized in Canada and Alaska. Nat. Can. 111: 447–449. Google Scholar

155.

Munyaneza, J.E., Crosslin, J.M., and Upton, J.E., 2006. Beet leafhopper (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) transmits the Columbia Basin potato purple top phytoplasma to potatoes, beets, and weeds. J. Econ. Entomol. 99: 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/99.2.268. pmid:16686123Google Scholar

156.

Neuffer, B. 1990. Ecotype differentiation in Capsella. Vegetatio, 89: 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00032168Google Scholar

157.

Neuffer, B. 2011. Native range variation in Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae) along a 2500 km latitudinal transect. Flora, 206: 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2010.03.001Google Scholar

158.

Neuffer, B., and Albers, S. 1996. Phenotypic and allozyme variability in Capsella populations with different ploidy levels from different continents. Bot. Jahrb. Syst., Pflanzengesch. 118: 433–450. Google Scholar

159.

Neuffer, B., and Bartelheim, S. 1989. Gen-ecology of Capsella bursa-pastoris from an altitudinal transsect in the Alps. Oecologia, 81: 521–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00378963. pmid:28312648Google Scholar

160.

Neuffer, B., and Eschner, S. 1995. Life history traits and ploidy levels in the genus Capsella (Brassicaceae). Can. J. Bot. 73: 1354–1365. https://doi.org/10.1139/b95-147Google Scholar

161.

Neuffer, B., and Hoffrogge, R., 2000. Ecotypic and allozyme variation of Capsella (Brassicaceae) along an altitudinal gradient on the Iberian Peninsula. An. Jard. Bot. Madr. 57: 299–315. Google Scholar

162.

Neuffer, B., and Hurka, H. 1986a. Variation of development time until flowering in natural populations of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Cruciferae). Plant Syst. Evol. 152: 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00989433Google Scholar

163.

Neuffer, B., and Hurka, H. 1986b. Variation of growth form parameters in Capsella (Cruciferae). Plant Syst. Evol. 153: 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00983693Google Scholar

164.

Neuffer, B., and Hurka, H. 1988. Germination behaviour in populations of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Cruciferae). Plant Syst. Evol. 161: 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00936010Google Scholar

165.

Neuffer, B., and Hurka, H. 1999. Colonization history and introduction dynamics of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae) in North America: Isozymes and quantitative traits. Mol. Ecol. 8: 1667–1681. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00752.x. pmid:10583830Google Scholar

166.

Neuffer, B., and Meyer-Walf, M. 1996. Ecotypic variation in relation to man made habitats in Capsella: Field and trampling area. Flora, 191: 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0367-2530(17)30689-8Google Scholar

167.

Neuffer, B., and Paetsch, M. 2013. Flower morphology and pollen germination in the genus Capsella (Brassicaceae). Flora, 208: 626–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2013.09.007Google Scholar

168.

Neuffer, B., Bernhardt, K.G., Hurka, H., and Kropf, M. 2011. Monitoring population and gene pool dynamics of the annual species Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae): A review of relevant species traits and the initiation of a long-term genetic monitoring programme. Biodivers. Conserv. 20: 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9957-zGoogle Scholar

169.

Neuffer, B., Wesse, C., Voss, I., and Scheibe, R. 2018. The role of ecotypic variation in driving worldwide colonization by a cosmopolitan plant. AoB Plants, 10(1), p.ply005. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/ply005Google Scholar

170.

Neuffer, B., Schorsch, M., Hameister, S., Knuesting, J., Selinski, J., and Scheibe, R., 2020. Physiological and anatomical differentiation of two sympatric weed populations. Peer J. 8: e9226. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9226. pmid:32587795Google Scholar

171.

Niu, Y.-Q., Sun, Y.-X., and Liu, T.-X. 2014. Development and reproductive potential of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on selected wild crucifer species. Environ. Entomol. 43: 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1603/en13206. pmid:24367918Google Scholar

172.

Noordam, D. 2004. Aphids of Java. Part V: Aphidini (Homoptera: Aphididae). Zool. Verh. 346: 7–83. Google Scholar

173.

The Noxious Weeds Act. CCSM c N110. 2010. [Online]. Available from https://canlii.ca/t/53n16[14 July 2021]. Google Scholar

174.

Nutt, P., Ziermann, J., Hintz, M., Neuffer, B., and Theißen, G. 2006. Capsella as a model system to study the evolutionary relevance of floral homeotic mutants. Plant Syst. Evol. 259: 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-006-0420-2Google Scholar

175.

O'Hayer, K.W., Schultz, G.A., Eastman, C.E., and Fletcher, J. 1984. Newly-discovered plant hosts of Spiroplasma citri. Plant Dis. 68: 336–338. Google Scholar

176.

Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs [OMAFRA]. 2020. Guide to Weed Control. Publication 75. Toronto. 396 p. Google Scholar

177.

Opiz, P.M. 1821. 2. Capsella apetala Opiz. Eine neue merkwürdige Pflanze. Flora Nr. 28, oder: Botanische Zeitung, Regensburg. [28. Juli 1821] Google Scholar

178.

Orsucci, M., Milesi, P., Hansen, J., Girodolle, J., Glémin, S., and Lascoux, M. 2020. Shift in ecological strategy helps marginal populations of shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris) to overcome a high genetic load. Proc. R. Soc. B. 287(1927): 20200463. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0463. pmid:32429810Google Scholar

179.

Pehlivan, M., Akgül, H., and Yayla, F. 2013. Some nutrient and trace elements content of wild plants using as ethno botanical and grown in the Gazientep region. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 3: 143–145. Google Scholar

180.

Perera, K.K., and Ayres, P.G. 1992. Effects of shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris L. Medic.) on the growth of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Weed Res. 32: 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1992.tb01893.xGoogle Scholar

181.

Perez-Jones, A., Intanon, S., and Mallory-Smith, C. 2009. Molecular analysis of hexazinone-resistant shepherd's-purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris) reveals a novel psbA mutation. Weed Sci. 57: 574–578. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-09-089.1Google Scholar

182.

Petkowski, J.E., Cunnington, J.H., Minchinton, E.J., and Cahill, D.M., 2010. Molecular phylogenetic relationships between Albugo candida collections on the Brassicaceae in Australia. Plant Pathol. 59: 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009. 02204.xGoogle Scholar

183.

Petrie, G.A., Séguin-Swartz, G., and Gugel, R.K. 1995. Latent infection of Brassicaceae in the field by Leptosphaeria maculans (Blackleg). Can. J. Plant Pathol. 17: 75–81. Google Scholar

184.

Pigott, C.D., Ratcliffe, D.A., Malloch, A.J.C., Birks, H.J.B., Proctor, M.C.F., Shimwell, D.W., et al. 2000. British Plant Communities. Pages 370–373 in J. S. Rodwell, ed. Maritime Communities and Vegetation of Open Habitats. Vol. 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511541834Google Scholar

185.

Popay, A.I., and Roberts, E.H. 1970a. Factors involved in the dormancy and germination of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik., and Senecio vulgaris L. J. Ecol. 58: 103–122. https://doi.org/10.2307/2258171Google Scholar

186.

Popay, A.I., and Roberts, E.H. 1970b. Ecology of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik., and Senecio vulgaris L. in relation to germination behavior. J. Ecol. 58: 123–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/2258172Google Scholar

187.

Poudel, B., Wintermantel, W.M., Cortez, A.A., Ho, T., Khadgi, A., and Tzanetakis, I.E. 2013. Epidemiology of blackberry yellow vein associated virus. Plant Dis. 97: 1352–1357. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-01-13-0018-re. pmid:30722181Google Scholar

188.

Qiao, H., Liu, F., Luo, J., Lai, F.-X., Wang, H.-D., and Dai, D.-J. 2009. Fitness of the small brown planthopper (Laodelphax striatellus) on different plants. Zhongguo Shuidao Kexue, 23: 71–78. Google Scholar

189.

Radisek, S., Jakse, J., Zhao, T.T., Cho, S.E., and Shin, H.D. 2018. First report of powdery mildew of Capsella bursa-pastoris caused by Golovinomyces orontii in Slovenia. J. Plant Pathol. 100: 359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-018-0071-5Google Scholar

190.

Rasochová, L., Passmore, B.K., Falk, B.W., and Miller, W.A. 1997. The satellite RNA of barley yellow dwarf virus-RPV is supported by beet western yellows virus in dicotyledonous protoplasts and plants. Virology, 231: 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1997.8532. pmid:9168880Google Scholar

191.

Rayia, A., Abu Ziada, M.E., and Al-Halboosi, S.R. 2020. Autecology and Economic Importance of Weed Flora of the Nile Delta: Capsella bursapastoris L. J. Plant Prod. 11(1): 49–56. Google Scholar

192.

Rees, M., and Brown, V.K., 1992. Interactions between invertebrate herbivores and plant competition. J. Ecol. 80: 353–360. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261017Google Scholar

193.

Ren, L., Fang, X.P., Sun, C.C., Chen, K.R., Liu, F., Li, M., and Xu, L., 2014. First report of clubroot on Capsella bursa-pastoris caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae in Sichuan province of China. Plant Dis. 98: 687. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-04-13-0395-pdn. pmid:30708514Google Scholar

194.

Rezvani, M., Zaefarian, F., and Amini, V. 2014. Effects of chemical treatments and environmental factors on seed dormancy and germination of shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medic.). Acta Bot. Brasilica, 28: 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062014abb3337Google Scholar

195.

Roberts, H.A., and Feast, P.M., 1973. Emergence and longevity of seeds of annual weeds in cultivated and undisturbed soil. J. Appl. Ecol. 10: 133–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404721Google Scholar

196.

Roberts, H.R., Warren, J.M., and Provan, J. 2018. Evidence for facultative protocarnivory in Capsella bursa-pastoris seeds. Sci. Rep. 8: 10120–10125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28564-x. pmid:29973685Google Scholar

197.

Rousseau, C. 1968. Histoire, habitat et distribution de 220 plantes introduites au Québec. Nat. Can. 95: 49–171. Google Scholar

198.

Royer, F., and Dickinson, R. 1999. Weeds of Canada and the Northern United States: A guide for identification. Edmonton: Lone Pine Publishing. 270 p. Google Scholar

199.

Sagun, V.G., and Auer, C. 2017. Pollen morphology of selected Camelineae (Brassicaceae). Palynology, 41: 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2016.1163517Google Scholar

200.

Sanderson, M.A., Stout, R., Goslee, S., Gonet, J., and Smith, R.G., 2014. Soil seed bank community structure of pastures and hayfields on an organic farm. Can. J. Plant Sci. 94: 621–631. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2013-288Google Scholar

201.

Sanger, M., Passmore, B., Falk, B.W., Bruening, G., Ding, B., and Lucas, W.J. 1994. Symptom severity of beet western yellow virus strain ST9 is conferred by the ST9-associated RNA and is not associated with virus release from the phloem. Virology, 200: 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1994.1161. pmid:8128637Google Scholar

202.

Sanguankeo, P.P., and León, R.G. 2011. Weed management practices determine plant and arthropod diversity and seed predation in vineyards. Weed Res. 51: 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00853.xGoogle Scholar

203.

Sansome, E., and Sansome, F.W. 1974. Cytology and life-history of Peronospora parasitica on Capsella bursa-pastoris and of Albugo candida on C. bursa-pastoris and on Lunaria annua. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 62: 323–IN24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1536(74) 80041-0Google Scholar

204.

Sarfraz, R.M., Dosdall, L.M., Keddie, B.A., and Myers, J.H. 2011. Larval survival, host plant preferences and developmental responses of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on wild brassicaceous species. Entomol. Sci. 14: 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8298.2010.00413.xGoogle Scholar

205.

Sarfraz, R.M., Dosdall, L.M., and Keddie, B.A. 2012. Influence of the herbivore host's wild food plants on parasitism, survival and development of the parasitoid Diadegma insulare. Biol. Control, 62: 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.03.004Google Scholar

206.

Sasakawa, K. 2011. Laboratory studies on larval food habits of two syntopic, related, graniverous grounds beetles Amara chalcites and A. congrua (Coleoptera: Carabidae): a comparison with stable isotope analysis. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 46: 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-011-0070-xGoogle Scholar

207.

Saska, P. 2008a. Effect of diet on the fecundity of three carabid beetles. Physiol. Entomol. 33: 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2008.00618.xGoogle Scholar

208.

Saska, P. 2008b. Granivory in terrestrial isopods. Ecol. Entomol. 33: 742–747. Google Scholar

209.

Saska, P., Koprdova, S., Martinkova, Z., and Honěk, A. 2014. Comparing methods of weed seed exposure to predators. Ann. Appl. Biol. 164: 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12102Google Scholar

210.

Saskatchewan Guide to Crop Protection. 2020. Guide to Crop Protection. For the chemical management of weed, plant diseases and insects. Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture. [Online]. Available from https://www.saskatchewan.ca/business/agriculture-natural-resources- and-industry/agribusiness-farmers-and-ranchers/crops-and-irrigation/crop-guides-and-publications/guide-to-crop-protection[10 Jul. 2021]. Google Scholar

211.

Savchuk, Y.I. 2012. Herbicide activity of some micromycetes. Mikrobiol. Zh. 74: 43–48. Google Scholar

212.

Schultze-Motel, W. 1986. Capsella. Pages 346–356 inIllustrierte flora von Mittel-europa. G. Hegi, ed. 3rd ed. Vol. 4. Verlag Paul Peray, Berlin, Hamburg, Germany. [in German]. Google Scholar

213.

Seal, A.N., Pratley, J.E., Haig, T.J., An, M., and Wu, H. 2009. Phytotoxic potential of shepherd's purse on annual ryegrass and wild radish. Allelopathy J. 24: 55–66. Google Scholar

214.

Séguin-Swartz, G., Nettleton, J., Sauder, C., Warwick, S.I., and Gugel, R.K. 2011. Hybridization potential between the oilseed crucifer Camelina sativa and canola, mustard and related weeds. Proc. 13th Internat. Rapeseed Congress, 5–9 June 2011, Prague, pp. 716–718. Google Scholar

215.

Semal, J. 1956. Transmission of beet mosaic virus from Stellaria media and Capsella bursa-pastoris by Myzus ascalonicus Doncaster. Nature, 178: 501–502. https://doi.org/10.1038/178501a0Google Scholar

216.

Shapland, E.B., Daane, K.M., Yokota, G.Y., Wistrom, C., Connell, J.J., Duncan, R.A., and Viveros, M.A. 2006. Ground vegetation survey for Xylella fastidiosa in California almond orchards. Plant Dis. 90: 905–909. https://doi.org/10.1094/pd-90-0905Google Scholar

217.

Shrestha, A., Mitchell, J.P., and Hembree, K.J., 2015. Weed seed-bank characterization in long-term cotton–tomato rotations in California. Agron. J. 107: 597–604. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14. 0443Google Scholar

218.

Shull, G.H. 1909. Bursa bursa-pastoris and Bursa heegeri biotypes and hybrids. Carnegie Institution Publications No. 112, Washington, DC. 57 pp. Google Scholar

219.

Shull, G.H. 1929. Species hybridization among old and new species of shepherd's purse. Proc. Int. Cong. Plant Sci. 1: 837–888. Google Scholar

220.

Sigareva, M.A., and Earle, E.D. 1999. Regeneration of plants from protoplasts of Capsella bursa-pastoris and somatic hybridization with rapid cycling Brassica oleracea. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050595Google Scholar

221.

Sikkema, P.H., Soltani, N., and Robinson, D.E. 2007. Responses of cole crops to pre-transplant herbicides. Crop Prot. 26: 1173–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.10.013Google Scholar

222.

Simmonds, H., Holst, P., and Bourke, C. 2000. The palatability, and potential toxicity of Australian weeds to goats. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Kingston. Australia.166 pp. Google Scholar

223.

Singh, S.P., Kumar, S., Singh, Y.P., and Singh, R. 2014. Reliable screening technique for evaluation of wild crucifers against mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.). Indian J. Exp. Biol. 52: 1201–1205. PMID:25651614. Google Scholar

224.

Sivesind, E.C., Leblanc, M.I., Cloutier, D.C., Seguin, P., and Stewart, K.A. 2009. Weed response to flame weeding at different developmental stages. Weed Technol. 23: 438–443. https://doi.org/10.1614/wt-08-155.1Google Scholar

225.

Skuhrava, M. 2011. A new genus and eight new species of gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Greece. Acta Soc. Zool. Bohemicae. 75: 265–295. Google Scholar

226.

Slotte, T., Holm, K., McIntyre, L.M., Ulf, L., and Lascoux, M. 2007. Differential expression of genes important for adaptation in Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae). Plant Physiol. 145: 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.102632. pmid:17631524Google Scholar

227.

Smith, E.A., DiTommaso, A., Fuchs, M., Shelton, A.M., and Nault, B.A., 2012. Abundance of weed hosts as potential sources of onion and potato viruses in western New York. Crop Protect. 37: 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.02.007Google Scholar

228.

Snodgrass, G.L., Scott, W.P., Abel, C.A., Robbins, J.T., Gore, J., and Hardee, D.D. 2006. Suppression of tarnished plant bugs (Heteroptera: Miridae) in cotton by control of early season wild host plants with herbicides. Environ Entomol. 35: 1417–1422. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/35.5.1417Google Scholar

229.

Soylu, S., Keshavarzi, M., Brown, I., and Mansfield, J.W., 2003. Ultrastructural characterisation of interactions between Arabidopsis thaliana and Albugo candida. Physiol. Mol. Plant Path. 63: 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2003.12.002Google Scholar

230.

Stace, C. 1997. New flora of the British Isles. 2 ed. Cambridge University Press. 1130 pp. Google Scholar

231.

Stephan, D., and Maiss, E. 2006. Biological properties of Beet mild yellowing virus derived from a full-length cDNA clone. J. Gen. Virol. 87: 445–449. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.81565-0. pmid:16432033Google Scholar

232.

Stevens, M., Smith, H.G., and Hallsworth, P.B. 1994. The host range of beet yellowing viruses among common arable weed species. Plant Pathol. 43: 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1994. tb01593.xGoogle Scholar

233.

Stevens, M., Patron, N.J., Dolby, C.A., Weekes, R., Hallsworth, P.B., Lemaire, O., and Smith, H.G. 2005. Distribution and properties of geographically distinct isolates of sugar beet yellowing viruses. Plant Pathol. 54: 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01155.xGoogle Scholar

234.

Storkey, J., and Westbury, D.B. 2007. Managing arable weeds for biodiversity. Pest Manag. Sci. 63: 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1375. pmid:17437252Google Scholar

235.

Stoyanov, K., 2005. Floristic materials and critical notes on the genus Orobanche subgen. Phelipanche in Bulgaria. Fl. Medit. 15: 461–476. Google Scholar

236.

Swarbrick, J.T., 1971. External mucilage production by the seeds of British plants. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 64: 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1971.tb02142.xGoogle Scholar

237.

Taylor, R.L., and Mulligan, GA. 1968. Flora of the Queen Charlotte Islands, part 2: cytological aspects of the vascular plants. Queen's Printer, Ottawa, ON. 148 pp. Google Scholar

238.

Toorop, P.E., Cuerva, R.C., Begg, G.S., Locardi, B., Squire, G.R., and Iannetta, P.P.M. 2012. Co-adaptation of seed dormancy and flowering time in the arable weed Capsella bursa-pastoris (shepherd's purse). Ann. Bot. 109: 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr301. pmid:22147546Google Scholar

239.

United States Department of Agriculture. 1960. Index of plant diseases in the United States. USDA Agricultural Handbook, 165: 1–531. Google Scholar

240.

Urquhart, E.J., Sun, L.J., and Punja, Z.K. 1997. Identification of species of Tilletiopsis using random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 19: 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060669709501064Google Scholar

241.

Van Acker, R.C., and Cici, S.Z.H., 2012. Timing of stinkweed and shepherd's-purse recruitment affects biological characteristics of progeny. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 933–936. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2012-024Google Scholar

242.

Vallad, G.E., Bhat, R.G., Koike, S.T., Ryder, E.J., and Subbarao, K.V. 2005. Weedborne reservoirs and seed transmission of Verticillium dahlia in lettuce. Plant Dis. 89: 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1094/pd-89-0317. pmid:30795356Google Scholar

243.

Venkatesh, R., Harrison, S.K., and Riedel, R.M. 2000. Weed hosts of soybean nematode (Heterodera glicines) in Ohio. Weed Technol. 14: 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037x(2000)014[0156: whoscn]2.0.co;2Google Scholar

244.

Wang, G-Q., Cui, H-l., Zhang, H-J., Zhang, Y-Q., Liu, X., Li, X-J., and Fan, C-Q. 2011. Tribenuron-methyl resistant shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris(L.) Medik.) in Hebei province of China. Agr. Sci. China. 10: 1241–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1671-2927(11)60115-6Google Scholar

245.

Wani, M.A., Jan, N., Qazi, H.A., Andrabi, K.I., and John, R. 2018. Cold stress induces biochemical changes, fatty acid profile, antioxidant system and gene expression in Capsella bursa pastoris L. Acta Physiol. Plant. 40: 1–14. Google Scholar

246.

Wei, Y.J. 2008. Studies of life history and some aspects of field biology and ecology of Nysius huttoni White (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae), J. R. Soc. N. Z. 38:149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0301422 0809510552 Google Scholar

247.

Welbank, P.J. 1963. A comparison of competitive effects of some common weed species. Ann. Appl. Biol. 51: 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1963.tb03679.xGoogle Scholar

248.

Werle, R., Bernards, M.L., Arkebauer, T.J., and Lindquist, J.L. 2014. Environmental triggers of winter annual weed emergence in the midwestern United States. Weed Sci. 62: 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-d-13-00091.1Google Scholar

249.

Wesse, C., Welk, E., Hurka, H., and Neuffer, B., 2021. Geographical pattern of genetic diversity in Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae)—A global perspective. Ecol. Evol. 11: 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7010. pmid:33437423Google Scholar

250.

Wiese, W.J., and Joubert, J.P.J. 2001. Capsella bursa-pastoris, Nitrate poisoning and pigs. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 72: 170–171. https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v72i3.644. pmid:11811708Google Scholar

251.

Wiklund, C., and Friberg, M. 2009. The evolutionary ecology of generalization: among-year variation in host plant use and offspring survival in a butterfly. Ecology, 90: 3406–3417. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1138.1. pmid:20120809Google Scholar

252.

Wilson, R.G., and Orloff, S.B. 2008. Winter annual weed control with herbicides in alfalfa-orchardgrass mixtures. Weed Technol. 22: 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1614/wt-07-070.1Google Scholar

253.

Williams, L., III, and Hendrix, D.L. 2008. Comparing different floral resources on the longevity of a parasitic wasp. Agric. Forest Entomol. 10: 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2007. 00355.xGoogle Scholar

254.

Yang, W. 2018. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer on growth and seed germination of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medikus. J. Plant Nutr. 41: 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2017.1415350Google Scholar

255.

Zennie, T.M., and Ogzewalla, D. 1977. Ascorbic acid and Vitamin A content of edible wild plants of Ohio and Kentucky. Econ. Bot. 31: 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02860657Google Scholar

256.

Žerdoner Čalasan, A., Seregin, A.P., Hurka, H., Hofford, N.P., and Neuffer, B. 2019. The Eurasian steppe belt in time and space: phylogeny and historical biogeography of the false flax (Camelina Crantz, Camelineae, Brassicaceae). Flora, 260: 151477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2019.151477Google Scholar

257.

Žerdoner Čalasan, A., Hurka, H., German, D.A., Pfanzelt, S., Blattner, F.R., Seidl, A., and Neuffer, B. 2021. Pleistocene dynamics of the Eurasian steppe as a driving force of evolution: Phylogenetic history of the genus Capsella (Brassicaceae). Ecol. Evol. 00: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8015 Google Scholar

258.

Zhang, C.J., and Auer, C., 2020. Hybridization between Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz and common Brassica weeds. Ind. Crops Prod. 147: 112240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112240Google Scholar

259.

Zhang, L., Li, W., Guo, W., Wu, C., Wang, H., Liu, W., and Wang, J. 2017. Herbicides cross resistance of a tribenuron-methyl resistant Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. population in wheat field. Chil. J. of Agric. Res. 77: 65–70. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-58392017000100008Google Scholar

260.

Zhao, Y., Damicone, J.P., and Bender, C.L. 2002. Detection, survival and sources of inoculum for bacterial diseases of leafy crucifers in Oklahoma. Plant Dis. 86: 883–888. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis.2002.86.8.883. pmid:30818643Google Scholar

261.

Zhou, T.Y., Lu L.L., Yang G., and Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2001. Brassicaceae (Cruciferae). Pages 1–193 in Z.Y. Wu, and P.H. Raven, eds. Flora of China 8. Science Press/Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing/St Louis. Google Scholar

262.

Ziermann, J., Ritz, M.S., Hameister, S., Abel, C., Hoffmann, M.H., Neuffer, B., and Theißen, G. 2009. Floral visitation and reproductive traits of stamenoid petals, a naturally occurring floral homeotic variant of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae). Planta, 230: 1239–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-009-1018-z. pmid:19784670Google Scholar
© 2021 Authors H.T. Ahmed, D.R. Clements, E. Dyck, N. Ross, M.K. Upadhyaya, and L.M. Hall and her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
Hafsa T. Ahmed, Ardath Francis, David R. Clements, Elyse Dyck, Natalie Ross, Mahesh K. Upadhyaya, Linda M. Hall, and Sara L. Martin "The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 159. Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.," Canadian Journal of Plant Science 102(3), 529-552, (5 November 2021). https://doi.org/10.1139/CJPS-2021-0059
Received: 6 March 2021; Accepted: 8 October 2021; Published: 5 November 2021
KEYWORDS
bourse-à-pasteur
Capsella bursa-pastoris
Capsella bursa-pastoris
cole crops
crucifères
dispersion des semences
shepherd’s purse
Back to Top