Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
15 August 2022 Evaluation of different methods for breaking cypsela dormancy in two local populations of Scotch thistle (Onopordum acanthium L.) collected from the west and northwest of Iran
Vahid Sarabi, Alireza Bagheri, Ali Asghar Chitband
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Scotch thistle (Onopordum acanthium L.) is a weed species on farmlands and pastures in parts of the west and northwest of Iran. Cypselas can remain in the soil seedbank over a prolonged period due to varying degrees of dormancy. This study examined different methods for breaking cypsela dormancy in two local populations of Scotch thistle at the research laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture of Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University in 2020. In these experiments, the effects of sulfuric acid, wet and dry prechilling, potassium nitrate, and gibberellic acid were evaluated on the breaking of dormancy. All the experiments were conducted as a completely randomized design with four replications and two runs. The response of two local populations of Scotch thistle were similar, and no significant difference was observed. The experiment treatments significantly increased cypsela germination compared with the control. The maximum germination percentages were observed in cypselas soaked in 98% sulfuric acid for 10 min (60.60%), KNO3 for 96 h (69.36%), GA3 for 48 h (88.43%), and wet prechilling for 72 h (34.61%). Although prechilling increased germination, it was suggested that germination could be more than the recorded values if the duration of wet prechilling was increased. The best cypsela germination rate, mean germination time, T50, and radicle and plumule length were observed after soaking in GA3 for 48 h and KNO3 for 96 h. It seems that water-soluble inhibitors in the embryo and probably the cypsela coat cause seed dormancy in this weed species. These findings could help develop effective management strategies associated with the dormancy of cypselas for this species.

L’onoporde acanthe est une adventice qui peuple les terres arables et les pâturages de l’ouest et du nord-ouest de l’Iran. Ses graines peuvent rester longtemps en dormance à un degré variable dans le sol. En 2020, les auteurs ont examiné plusieurs méthodes pour tirer les graines de deux populations locales de leur dormance, au laboratoire de la faculté d’agriculture de l’Université Shahid Madani en Azerbaïdjan. Lors de ces expériences, ils ont évalué l’efficacité de l’acide sulfurique, de la réfrigération préalable en présence ou en l’absence d’eau, du nitrate de potassium et de l’acide gibberelique pour sortir les graines de leur dormance. Les expériences ont toutes suivi un modèle entièrement aléatoire, reproduit quatre fois à deux reprises. Les deux populations locales d’onoporde ont réagi de la même façon et les auteurs n’ont relevé aucune variation digne de mention. Les traitements augmentent sensiblement la germination, comparativement au témoin. Les taux de germination maximaux observés étaient les suivants : 60,60 % pour la scarification avec de l’acide sulfurique à 98 % pendant 10 minutes, 69,36 % pour le trempage dans du KNO3 pendant 96 heures, 88,43 % pour le trempage dans du GA3 pendant 48 heures et 34,61 % pour la réfrigération préalable en présence d’eau pendant 72 heures. Bien que la dernière méthode améliore la germination, celle-ci pourrait sans doute être plus importante que celle observée si on prolongeait la période de réfrigération. Les meilleurs résultats pour le taux de germination, le temps de levée moyen, la T50, la longueur des radicules et celle de la plumule ont été relevés après trempage pendant 48 heures dans du GA3 et pendant 96 heures dans du KNO3. Apparemment, chez cette espèce, la dormance résulte d’inhibiteurs hydrosolubles présents dans l’embryon et, vraisemblablement, dans les téguments de la graine. Ces observations pourraient contribuer à l’élaboration de stratégies efficaces pour combattre la dormance des semences de cette espèce. [Traduit par la Rédaction]

Introduction

Scotch thistle (Onopordum acanthium L.) (Asteraceae) has a Eurasian origin, and it is a native of southern Europe, western and central Asia, and Asia Minor (Young and Evans 1969; Cavers et al. 2011). It represents an invasive weed in the western United States, Australia, Argentina, parts of Canada, and New Zealand, and it is a serious problem in pastures, along roadsides, rangeland, gravelly riverbanks, and well-drained sandy or gravelly soils (Harizanova et al. 2010; Cavers et al. 2011). Also, it has been found in agricultural fields, so its infestation causes annual losses to ranchers of US$16.60/ha in wheatgrass stands in northern California, USA (Hooper et al. 1970; Qaderi 1998; Smith et al. 1999). The plant is commonly a monocarpic winter annual, biennial, or short-lived perennial, propagated by cypsela (a dry, single-seeded fruit) production (Qaderi et al. 2005). It flowers from late June to October and ovule fertilization occurs by self-or cross-pollination, which can be accomplished by wind and (or) insects. Depending on size, a single Scotch thistle plant can produce as few as 100 to as many as 50 000 cypselas. Cypselas are spatula-like, with four to five angled surfaces, without hairs, and mottled brown to nearly black (Qaderi 1998; Schuster and Prather 2003).

Scotch thistle has a unique pattern of population dynamics, so some cypselas may germinate shortly after dispersal (in fall). In contrast, others may remain dormant but viable for at least 40 years in the soil (Toole and Brown 1946; Qaderi and Cavers 2002). Control of Scotch thistle is difficult due to the varying degrees of cypsela dormancy and prolonged persistence in soil seedbanks. Cavers et al. (1995) reported that in the Onopordum genus cypselas varying greatly in dormancy were found in the same population, and Meier (1995) found that cypselas from a single plant can differ significantly in seed dormancy. Roberts and Chancellor (1979) declared that the level of innate dormancy in their sample of Scotch thistle appeared to be somewhat more significant than that in the other species they tested. Variation in germination pattern within local populations of Scotch thistle is beneficial for the survival of this species (Qaderi and Cavers 2002). Scifres and McCarty (1969) reported that cypselas of Scotch thistle contain water-soluble germination inhibitors and are sensitive to differences in light quality. Young and Evans (1972) declared that this sensitivity-to-light quality is a symptom of the regulation of germination by phytochromes, so both the soluble inhibitors and the sensitivity-to-light quality function in the embryo, not in the cypsela coat.

Various authors have reported germination responses in Scotch thistle to high temperatures, gibberellic acid (GA3), increased soil nitrate levels, scarification, stratification, leaching, exposure to red light, and other factors as stimulating germination (Scifres and McCarty 1969; Young and Evans 1972; Perez-Garcia 1993). Techniques such as mechanical scarification with sandpaper (Ali et al. 2011), chemical scarification with acids (H2SO4, HNO3, and HCl), soaking of seeds (or fruits) in hot water for a short time (Olmez et al. 2008), and perforation of the seed/fruit coat (Aliero 2004) are the most commonly used methods for breaking the physical dormancy of seeds/fruits. Sulfuric acid treatment damages the surface of the seed/fruit coat or splits the palisade layer of the micropylar, thereby facilitating the diffusion of oxygen and water and reducing the mechanical resistance to radical emergence (Schelin et al. 2003). Contreras and Ruter (2009) have observed the positive effect of sulfuric acid scarification (15 to 30min soaking in concentrated sulfuric acid) on the germination of American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana L.) seeds (located in the fruit berry-like drupe with a fleshy exocarp and hard endocarp separated into four pyrenes, each containing a single seed at ripening).

A period of prechilling (stratification) also relieves the dormancy of many species across many plant families (Conner 2008; Tang et al. 2008). Furthermore, the importance of cold stratification has been confirmed in many species of the Asteraceae family. For example, cold stratification breaks cypsela dormancy in narrow-leaved purple coneflower (Echinacea angustifolia DC.) (Baskin et al. 1992), whiteflower leafcup (Polymnia canadensis L.) (Bender et al. 2003), Guizotia scabra (Vis.) Chiov., Santa Maria feverfew (Parthenium hysterophorus L.), golden crownbeard [Verbesina encelioides (Cav.) Benth. & Hook. f. ex A. Gray] (Karlsson et al. 2008), as well as false mayweed [Tripleurospermum maritimum (L.) W.D.J. Koch] (Bochenek et al. 2010), while a moderate thermal stratification has a positive influence on cypsela germination in Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] (Bochenek et al. 2009). Cold stratification simulates cold winter conditions for seeds/fruits with internal dormancy (Karlsson et al. 2006). A prechilling treatment changes the inhibitor and promoter balance in seeds/fruits (Ren and Guan 2008). Conner (2008) and Kucera et al. (2005) reported that a prechilling treatment increased GA3 synthesis in the embryo and thus was a germination promoter.

Potassium nitrate (KNO3) is the most common chemical that was used for breaking seed dormancy and promoting seed germination (Gashi et al. 2012). KNO3 has been used for many years, with positive studies beginning in the 1980s, but it often increased the germination of photodormant seeds (Shanmugavalli et al. 2007). The most significant germination of long-headed poppy (Papaver dubium L.) and common poppy (Papaver rhoeas L.) seeds in a light/dark regime was observed at concentrations of 0.5 g L−1 KNO3, by 40.8% and 44.2%, respectively (Golmohammadzadeh et al. 2015). GA3 also is a successful chemical in breaking dormancy and promoting germination in seeds (or fruits) (Bewley and Black 1982). For germination, seeds or fruits need GA3 to offset the action of abscisic acid (ABA), a dormancy regulator (Hilhorst and Karssen 1992) that is not resynthesized in mature seeds (or fruits) (Karssen 1995). Qaderi and Cavers (2000) observed that GA3, even at a very low concentration, causes most viable cypselas of Scotch thistle to germinate. Perez-Garcia and Duran (1990) have also shown that the addition of 2 mmolL−1 GA3 enhances the germination of cypselas of Moor's cotton thistle (Onopordum nervosum Boiss.), and the germination percentage (GP) increases as the GA3 concentration increases. However, these chemical compounds do not promote germination in all seeds/fruits, and depending on the method and dosage, they can even inhibit germination. Thus, for each species the appropriate means of treatment, concentration, and other conditions need to be investigated (Baskin and Baskin 2014).

Several authors have studied cypsela dormancy of Sotch thistle in the invaded areas (Scifres and McCarty 1969; Young and Evans 1972; Qaderi and Cavers 2003; Qaderi et al. 2003, 2012), but there is currently little information on cypsela germination patterns in biotypes of Scotch thistle to be studied from a native area. We chose to work with Scotch thistle because it germinates intermittently and can be a good model system for the investigation of dry storage in the dormancy state. Information from this type of study will be helpful for researchers who store seeds or fruits under dry conditions for extended periods. Based on this information, this study aimed to determine an effective method(s) for breaking cypsela dormancy in two local populations of Scotch thistle collected from Kermanshah and Tabriz, Iran. To address this aim, we examined the GP, germination rate (GR), mean germination time (MGT), T50, and radicle and plumule length of Scotch thistle cypselas by applying sulfuric acid as a chemical scarification, dry and wet prechilling, and GA3 and KNO3 pretreatments as a cold and chemical stratification. Our work may help to clarify which of the dormancy-breaking methods can mitigate the dormancy in Scotch thistle cypselas and promote germination.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Three Petri dish experiments in two runs were conducted at the research laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture of Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University of Tabriz, Iran (37°48′49″N lat.; 45°56′01″E long.; alt. 1318.8 m) in 2020. In these experiments, breaking Scotch thistle cypsela dormancy was evaluated using concentrated sulfuric acid (98%, H2SO4, Merck, Germany), dry and wet prechilling, KNO3 (Sigma-Aldrich 7757-79-1, Inc.), and GA3 (Sigma-Aldrich G7645, Inc.). Scotch thistle cypselas were collected from at least five randomly selected capitula from 30 plants in each of two local populations of Kermanshah (34°19′21″N lat.; 47°06′03″E long.; alt. 1372 m above sea level) on 6 August 2019 and Tabriz (37°48′49″N lat.; 45°56′01″E long.; alt. 1318.8 m above sea level) on 13 September 2019. The collected cypselas from the two local populations of Kermanshah and Tabriz were pooled separately and were stored at 4 °C and 40% relative humidity for 12 months prior to the start of the experiments. Thirty cypselas were placed in 9 cm diameter glass Petri dishes with a single layer of Whatman (Whatman, England) No. 1 filter paper. The filter paper was moistened with 6 mL of distilled water. All the Petri dishes were sealed with parafilm to inhibit evaporation and water loss. The Petri dishes were placed in a seed germinator at 25–15 °C and 60% relative humidity with an 8 h photoperiod to germinate the cypselas (Young and Evans 1972). Fluorescent lamps provided the light to produce a light intensity with an amount of illumination of 112 µmolesm−2s−1 (Young and Evans 1972). Before germination tests, cypselas were sterilized with 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 10 min and subsequently rinsed with distilled water several times. Cypsela germination was monitored for 39 days after incubation, and the experiments were terminated after a 5 day period with no germination (according to Qaderi and Cavers 2000). The cypselas were germinated when the radicle and plumule lengths reached 2 mm. After incubation for 20 days, five seedlings of similar size were selected from each Petri dish to determine radicle and plumule lengths. The viability of nongerminated cypselas was determined using a 0.1% tetrazolium chloride (T8877, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) solution (Peters 2000). Treatments on the cypselas of the two local populations of Scotch thistle were carried out in three experiments, including the following.

Sulfuric acid treatments

Concentrated sulfuric acid was used to soak cypselas for 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 min. The cypselas were then washed in running water for 10 min to remove any trace of acid before being tested for germination. Next, Petri dishes containing cypselas were placed in a seed germinator, and their solution was replaced every 4 days to eliminate water-soluble inhibitors in the embryo or cypsela coat.

Dry and wet prechilling treatments

The cypselas were placed between either two layers of dry paper (dry prechilling) or moistened with distilled water (wet prechilling) and placed in plastic bags. The samples were stored in a refrigerator at a temperature of 4 °C for 24, 48, and 72 h. When treatment was applied longer than 24 h, distilled water was renewed daily. Then, cypselas in the Petri dish were placed in a seed germinator.

KNO3 and GA3 treatments

The cypselas were soaked in 1 g L−1 solutions of KNO3 and GA3. The cypselas were soaked in KNO3 for 24, 48, and 96 h and in GA3 for 12, 24, and 48 h, at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C), before germination tests. The duration of the KNO3 and GA3 treatments was determined based on the pretest.

Data analysis

The germination status of the cypselas was inspected at 2–3 day intervals after seeding. The GP was calculated using the following formula:

cjps-2021-0234_ueq1.gif

where n is the number of germinated cypselas, and N is the number of cypselas used at the beginning of the experiment. The GR was calculated according to the following formula (Maguire 1962):

cjps-2021-0234_ueq2.gif

where Si is the number of germinated cypselas on day i on which a count was made and seedlings removed and Di is the number of days from the start of the experiment. The following equation was used to calculate the MGT (Ellis and Roberts 1981; Kwon et al. 2020):

cjps-2021-0234_ueq3.gif

where d is the number of days from the beginning of the test, n is the number of germinated cypselas between scoring intervals, and N is the total number of germinated cypselas in the treatment at the end of the experiment. The time from seeding to reaching 50% of the final GP (T50) was calculated according to the following equation (Coolbear et al. 1984; Farooq et al. 2005; Kwon et al. 2020):

cjps-2021-0234_ueq4.gif

where N is the total number of germinated cypselas and ni and nj are the cumulative germination numbers in sequential counts at times (days) Ti and Tj, when ni < N/2 < nj. The lengths of the radicle and plumule were measured at the end of the experiments.

All the experiments were conducted as a completely randomized design with four replications. Each experiment was repeated two times (two runs). All the data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using PROC GLM or PROC MIXED in SAS version 9.2.0 statistical software. Treatments of breaking dormancy were assumed as fixed factors; the population and repetition of the experiments were random factors. The assumption of the variance analysis was tested by ensuring that the residuals were random, homogeneous, and with a normal distribution about a mean of zero using residual plots and the Anderson–Darling test. Final GPs were normalized by the arcsine square root of the percentage where it was required and means were compared on the transformed scale and were converted back to the original scale for presentation of results. Means were separated using Tukey's mean comparison test at a 0.05 significance threshold.

Results and discussion

Scotch thistle cypselas were retrieved on day 39 of incubation from the seed germinator and then the germination characteristics of the two local populations were calculated using sulfuric acid as a chemical scarification, dry and wet prechilling, and GA3 and KNO3 pretreatments as a cold and chemical stratification (according to Kwon et al. 2020).

Sulfuric acid treatments

The GP, GR, MGT, and T50 of Scotch thistle cypselas were affected by sulfuric acid (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 1) and there was a significant difference between cypselas soaked in sulfuric acid based on the time duration compared with the control. Among sulfuric acid treatments, the highest percentage (60.6%) and rate (2.99) were found in sulfuric acid treatment for 10 min. Also, the lowest MGT (10.42 days) and T50 (7.87 days) were found in sulfuric acid treatment for 10 min (Table 2). The radicle length of Scotch thistle cypselas was significantly influenced under sulfuric acid use (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 1), such that the greatest radicle length was observed when cypselas were soaked in sulfuric acid for 10 min (1.90 cm) (Table 2). In addition, cypselas soaking in sulfuric acid were effective on the plumule length compared with the control (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 1), such that the longest plumule was observed when cypselas were soaked in sulfuric acid for 10 min. Despite the radicle and plumule lengths reducing on increasing the duration of soaking cypselas in sulfuric acid, the 20 min treatment was not different from all the other treatments that had an exposure time of greater than 20 min (Table 2). Our experiments demonstrated that soaking Scotch thistle cypselas in 98% sulfuric acid for 10–20 min significantly improved the GP, GR, and radicle and plumule lengths, and reduced the MGT and T50, and it was the most effective at dissolving the cypsela coat compared with the control. Previous studies indicated that soaking seeds in 98% sulfuric acid for 15 min reduces seed hardness in Russian fenugreek [Medicago ruthenica (L.) Ledebour] erect ecotypes (Xu and De 1996). It seems that pretreating by sulfuric acid led to disrupting the cypsela coat and thereby imbibition of water into the embryo. This likely led to water-soluble inhibitors being discharged in the water solution and their concentration being alleviated in the cypsela coat and embryo. Schuster and Prather (2003) stated that Scotch thistle cypselas contain water-soluble germination inhibitors and require moisture to break dormancy. Earlier studies also showed that water-soluble compounds such as chlorogenic acid and para-substituted benzamide bound to the cypsela wall have an inhibitory effect on cypsela germination and are involved in the dormancy of fresh cypselas of Scotch thistle (Qaderi et al. 2003; Qaderi et al. 2012).

Table 1.

ANOVA (p value) of the germination characteristics of Scotch thistle cypselas on using sulfuric acid as a physical seed dormancy-breaking mechanism.

cjps-2021-0234_tab1.gif

Table 2.

The response of germination characteristics of Scotch thistle cypselas following treatment with sulfuric acid as a physical seed dormancy-breaking mechanism.

cjps-2021-0234_tab2.gif

However, germination characteristics such as GP, GR, and radicle and plumule lengths were reduced in the two local populations of Scotch thistle on increasing the duration of soaking cypselas in 98% sulfuric acid. In contrast, MGT and T50 were increased on increasing the duration of soaking Scotch thistle cypselas in 98% sulfuric acid. These findings indicated that soaking cypselas in 98% sulfuric acid for a long time might cause injury in storage parts or the embryo. Aliero (2004) reported that 98% concentrated sulfuric acid gave the highest percentage of germination within the shortest period compared with 90%, 70%, and 50% concentrations, respectively.

Dry and wet prechilling treatments

The GP and GR were affected by the prechilling treatments (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 3), such that the highest GPs of 34.61% and 29.59% occurred in the 72 h wet and dry prechilling , respectively. Nevertheless, the maximum GR of 1.73 cypselas per day was recorded for the 72 h wet prechilling. In contrast, the 24 h wet and dry prechilling caused a reduction in the GP and GR compared with the 72 h prechilling (Table 4). Also, there was a significant difference among treatments using dry and wet prechilling in the MGT and T50 of Scotch thistle cypselas compared with the control (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 3), such that the lowest (9.54 and 7.15 days) were related to cypselas soaked in wet prechilling for 72 h (Table 4). The radicle and plumule lengths were significantly affected on using prechilling treatments compared with the control (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 3), such that the greatest radicle and plumule lengths (1.55 and 2.11 cm) were recorded when cypselas were soaked with 72 h wet prechilling. However, there was no significant difference between the 72 h wet and dry prechilling in radicle and plumule lengths. The lowest radicle and plumule lengths, 0.56 and 0.93 cm, respectively, occurred when cypselas were treated with 24 h dry prechilling (Table 4). Overall, the cypsela GP, GR, and radicle and plumule lengths in the two local populations were improved on increasing the duration of prechilling. In addition, wet prechilling was more effective than dry prechilling in breaking dormancy in Scotch thistle cypselas. Schutte et al. (2012) reported that giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) embryos excised from nearly fresh cypselas (i.e., stored dry at 4 °C for 45 days) were still highly dormant and that a period of stratification (i.e., moist storage at 4 °C) was an absolute requirement for dormancy loss. Giant ragweed cypselas required a minimum of 6 weeks of stratification to alleviate dormancy, and up to 80% of viable cypselas germinated (Page and Nurse 2015). Golmohammadzadeh et al. (2015) indicated that 45 days of wet prechilling was sufficient to break the seed dormancy in long-headed and common poppy, and as a reaction to the prechilling treatment, common poppy showed a 48% higher level of germination than long-headed poppy. Increasing the moist prechilling duration from 15 to 30 days enhanced the seed germination of downy woundwort [Stachys germanica (L.) subsp. bithynica (Boiss.) R. Bhattacharjee] from 68% to 95%, respectively (Güleryüz et al. 2011). Therefore, it can be concluded that stratification, especially wet prechilling, could effectively break the physiological dormancy of Scotch thistle cypselas if this pretreatment is used for a long time. Kambizi et al. (2006) stated that cytokinin and gibberellin levels increased in the embryo of ashwagandha [Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal] during prechilling. In contrast, the ABA levels in the seeds that received a moist prechilling treatment declined during the imbibition regimes of the cold treatment, because of leaching. Also, Nkomo and Kambizi (2009) and Gashi et al. (2012) stated that moist prechilling acts as a priming treatment to provide the seeds' moisture requirement to activate the gibberellin-synthesizing mechanism and the hydraulic enzymes.

Table 3.

ANOVA (pvalue) of the germination characteristics of Scotch thistle cypselas on using dry and wet prechilling as a physiological seed dormancy-breaking mechanism.

cjps-2021-0234_tab3.gif

Table 4.

The response of germination characteristics of Scotch thistle cypselas following treatment with dry and wet prechilling as a physiological seed dormancy-breaking mechanism.

cjps-2021-0234_tab4.gif

KNO3 and GA3 treatments

KNO3 and GA3 concentrations were effective in breaking Scotch thistle cypsela dormancy (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 5), such that the GP and GR increased as the KNO3 and GA3 concentrations increased. The highest GP and GR were observed when cypselas were soaked in GA3 for 48 h (88.43% and 4.96 cypselas per day) and KNO3 for 96 h (69.36% and 3.30 cypselas per day) (Table 6). KNO3 and GA3 were significantly effective in reducing the MGT of Scotch thistle cypselas (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 5), such that the lowest MGTs were 9.47 and 9.34 days for cypselas soaked in GA3 for 48 h and KNO3 for 96 h, respectively (Table 6). The T50 of Scotch thistle cypselas was significantly affected by the KNO3 and GA3 pretreatments (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 5). The lowest values of T50 were observed when cypselas were treated with GA3 for 48 h (7.10 days) and KNO3 for 96 h (6.86 days) (Table 6). The radicle and plumule lengths were also significantly affected on using KNO3 and GA3 (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 5), such that the greatest radicle and plumule lengths (2.96 and 3.57 cm) among treatments were recorded when cypselas were soaked in GA3 for 48 h. Furthermore, the longest radicle (2.07 cm) and plumule (2.46 cm) lengths were observed when cypselas were treated with KNO3 for 96 h (Table 6). The current research revealed that exogenous KNO3 and GA3 applications induced higher GP, GR, and radicle and plumule lengths, and lowered the MGT and T50, in cypselas of the two local populations of Scotch thistle compared with the control. KNO3 effectively broke dormancy in the Scotch thistle when cypselas were soaked in this solution for 96 h. Kwon et al. (2020) reported that KNO3 at 0.20 g L−1 improved the germination characteristics of Maesa japonica (Thunb.) Moritzi & Zoll. seeds (such as MGT and T50) and increased the GP to 74% at 30 days. Priming with 0.2% or 0.5% solution of KNO3 for 72 h is a recommended method (GP greater than 74.4%) that can be practically applied for increasing the germination of seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum Swartz) under an alternating-temperature (25/35 °C) condition (Shim et al. 2008). The positive effect of KNO3 could be related to its role in balancing seed hormones that reduce germination inhibitors, such as ABA (Gashi et al. 2012). Duermeyer et al. (2018) suggested that a gene encoding the ABA catabolic enzyme CYP707A2 is directly regulated by the NIN-like protein 8 transcription factor (which acts downstream of nitrate signaling), and this regulation triggers a nitrate-induced ABA decrease that permits seed germination. However, it seems that a higher concentration of KNO3 or soaking for a long time is required to stimulate metabolic activity and to lower the ABA concentration in the embryo and cypselas coat. Maximum germination was observed when cypselas were soaked in GA3 for 48 h, in agreement with Kwon et al. (2020), who stated that concentrations of GA≥ 1.0 g L−1 greatly improved the GP in M. japonica seeds. Previous studies also indicated that the seeds of weed species treated with GA3 germinated markedly better than those of the control absent of GA3 treatment (Rogis et al. 2004). GA3 signaling, like KNO3, induces lower ABA concentrations by activation of proteins that regulate the gene or genes encoding the ABA catabolic enzymes to overcome the physiological dormancy in seeds with a dormant embryo. Kucera et al. (2005) revealed that GA3 promotes seed/fruit germination by activating the synthesis of proteins and other required metabolites for the embryo.

Table 5.

ANOVA (p value) of the germination characteristics of Scotch thistle cypselas on using KNO3 and GA3 as a physiological seed dormancy-breaking mechanism.

cjps-2021-0234_tab5.gif

Table 6.

The response of germination characteristics of Scotch thistle cypselas following treatment with KNO3 and GA3 as a physiological seed dormancy-breaking mechanism.

cjps-2021-0234_tab6.gif

Conclusions

In summary, the germination characteristics significantly improved when sulfuric acid was applied for 10 min. It seems that soaking cypselas in 98% sulfuric acid can help in reducing the concentrations of water-soluble inhibitors in the embryo and cypselas coat, and then cypselas initiate germination. Hence, the chemical scarification of Scotch thistle cypselas could lead to the breaking of physiological dormancy and germination. Despite 72 h moist cold stratification led to cypselas germination up to 34.61%, these results indicated that germination of cypselas would be improved if the duration of soaking cypselas in water-solution was increased. The best germination response was observed when cypselas were soaked in KNO3 for 96 h and GA3 for 48 h. These findings could help future studies on Scotch thistle by alleviating cypsela dormancy and thereby aiding in rapid germination.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Faculty of Agriculture, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran, for providing the experimental facilities in the physiology laboratory for this research. We thank Kazem Lotfi for his help in performing the laboratory surveys.

References

1.

Aliero, B.L. 2004. Effects of sulfuric acid, mechanical scarification and wet heat treatments on germination of seeds of African locust bean tree, Parkia biglobosa. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 3(3): 179–181. Google Scholar

2.

Ali, H.H., Tanveer, A., Nadeem, M.A, and Asghar, H.N. 2011. Methods to break seed dormancy of Rhynchosia capitata, a summer annual weed. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 71: 483–487. Google Scholar

3.

Baskin, C.C., and Baskin, J.M. 2014. Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination, 2nd ed. Academic/Elsevier, San Diego, CA. Google Scholar

4.

Baskin, C.C., Baskin, J.M., and Hoffman, G.R. 1992. Seed dormancy in the prairie forb Echinacea angustifolia var. angustifolia (Asteraceae): afterripening pattern during cold stratification. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1086/297027Google Scholar

5.

Bender, M.H., Baskin, J.M., and Baskin, C.C. 2003. Seed germination ecology of Polymnia canadensis (Asteraceae), a monocarpic species of the North American temperate deciduous forest. Plant Ecol. 168: 221–253. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024437510330Google Scholar

6.

Bewley, J.D., and Black, M. 1982. Physiology and biochemistry of seeds. 2. Viability, dormancy, and environmental control. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 375pp. Google Scholar

7.

Bochenek, A., Golaszewski, J., Piotrowicz-Cieslak, A.I., and Gorecki, R.J. 2009. The effects of temperature on the dormancy and germination of Cirsium arvense seeds. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 78: 105–114. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2009.014Google Scholar

8.

Bochenek, A., Golaszewski, J., and Gielwanowska, I. 2010. A hydrotime model analysis of Matricaria maritima subsp. inodora seed dormancy. Plant Spec. Biol. 25: 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.2010.00276.xGoogle Scholar

9.

Cavers, P.B., Groves, R.H., and Kaye, P.E. 1995. Seed population dynamics of Onopordum over 1 year in southern New South Wales. J. Appl. Ecol. 32: 425–433. https://doi.org/10.2307/2405108Google Scholar

10.

Cavers, P.B., Qaderi, M.M., Threadgill, P.F., and Steel, M.G. 2011. The biology of Canadian weeds. 147. Onopordum acanthium L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 91: 739–758. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps10195Google Scholar

11.

Conner, P.J. 2008. Effect of stratification, germination temperature and pretreatment with gibberellic acid and hydrogen peroxide on germination of “Fry” muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia) seed. HortScience, 43: 853–856. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.43.3.853Google Scholar

12.

Contreras, R.N., and Ruter, J.M. 2009. Sulfuric acid scarification of Callicarpa americana L. (Lamiaceae) seeds improves germination. Native Plants J. 10(3): 283–286. Google Scholar

13.

Coolbear, P., Francis, A., and Grierson, D. 1984. The effect of low temperature pre-sowing treatment on the germination performance and membrane integrity of artificially aged tomato seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 35: 1609–1617. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/35.11.1609Google Scholar

14.

Duermeyer, L., Khodapanahi, E., Yan, D., Krapp, A., Rothstein, S.J., and Nambara, E. 2018. Regulation of seed dormancy and germination by nitrate. Seed Sci. Res. 28(3): 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1017/s096025851800020xGoogle Scholar

15.

Ellis, R.H., and Roberts, E.H. 1981. The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 9: 373–409. Google Scholar

16.

Farooq, M., Basra, S.M.A., Ahmad, N., and Hafeez, K. 2005. Thermal hardening: a new seed vigor enhancement tool in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 47: 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2005.00031.xGoogle Scholar

17.

Gashi, B., Abdullai, K., Mata, V., and Kongjika, E. 2012. Effect of gibberellic acid and potassium nitrate on seed germination of the resurrection plants Ramonda serbica and Ramonda nathaliae. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11: 4537–4542. Google Scholar

18.

Golmohammadzadeh, S., Zaefarian, F., and Rezvani, M. 2015. Effects of some chemical factors, prechilling treatments and interactions on the seed dormancy-breaking of two Papaver species. Weed Biol. Manage. 15: 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12056Google Scholar

19.

Güleryüz, G., Kirmizi, S., Arslan, H., and Sakar, F.S. 2011. Dormancy and germination in Stachys germanica L. subsp. bithynica (Boiss.) Bhattacharjee seeds: effects of short-time moist chilling and plant growth regulators. Flora, 206: 943–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2011.07.003Google Scholar

20.

Harizanova, V., Stoeva, A., Cristofaro, M., Paolini, A., Lecce, F., and Di Cristina, F. 2010. Preliminary results on the phytophagous insect fauna on Onopordum acanthium (Asteraceae) in Bulgaria. Pestic. Fitomed. 25(4): 301–309. Google Scholar

21.

Hilhorst, H.W.M., and Karssen, C.M. 1992. Seed dormancy and germination: the role of abscisic acid and gibberellins and the importance of hormone mutants. Plant Growth Regul. 11: 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00024561Google Scholar

22.

Hooper, J.F., Young, J.A., and Evans, R.A. 1970. Economic evaluation of Scotch thistle suppression. Weed Sci. 18: 583–586. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500034251Google Scholar

23.

Kambizi, L., Adebola, P.O., and Afolayan, A.J. 2006. Effects of temperature, pre-chilling and light on seed germination of Withania somnifera. S. Afr. J. Bot. 72: 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2005.03.001Google Scholar

24.

Karlsson, L.M., Ericsson, J., and Milberg, P. 2006. Seed dormancy and germination in the summer annuals Galeopsis speciosa. Weed Res. 46: 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 3180.2006.00518.xGoogle Scholar

25.

Karlsson, L.M., Tamado, T., and Milberg, P. 2008. Interspecies comparison of seed dormancy and germination of six annual Asteraceae weeds in an ecological context. Seed Sci. Res. 18: 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0960258508888496Google Scholar

26.

Karssen, C.M. 1995. Hormonal regulation of seed development, dormancy, and germination studied by genetic control. InSeed development and germination. Edited by J. Kigel and G. Gallili. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. pp. 333–350. Google Scholar

27.

Kucera, B., Cohn, M.A., and Leubner-Metzger, G. 2005. Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Sci. Res. 15: 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1079/ssr2005218Google Scholar

28.

Kwon, H.J., Shin, S.L., Kim, Y.R., and Kim, S.Y. 2020. Effects of temperature, gibberellic acid, and KNO3 treatments on seed germination of the wild plant Maesa japonica. Seed Sci. Technol. 48(1): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2020.48.1.09Google Scholar

29.

Maguire, J.D. 1962. Speed of germination-aid in selection and evaluation for seedling emergence and vigor. Crop Sci. 2: 176–177. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183x000200020033xGoogle Scholar

30.

Meier, L.R. 1995. Variation in seeds of Onopordum acanthium. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON. 113pp. Google Scholar

31.

Nkomo, M., and Kambizi, L. 2009. Effects of pre-chilling and temperature on seed germination of Corchorus olitorius L. (Tiliaceae), a wild leafy vegetable. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8: 1078–1081. Google Scholar

32.

Olmez, Z., Yahyaoglu, Z., Temel, F., and Gokturk, A. 2008. Effects of some pretreatments on germination of bladder-senna (Colutea armena Boiss. and Huet.) and smoke-tree (Cotinus coggygria Scop.) seeds. J. Environ. Biol. 29: 319–323. Google Scholar

33.

Page, E.R., and Nurse, R.E. 2015. Comparing physical, chemical, and cold stratification methods for alleviating dormancy of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) seeds. Weed Technol. 29: 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1614/wt-d-14-00061.1Google Scholar

34.

Perez-Garcia, F. 1993. Effect of the origin of cypsela on germination of Onopordum acanthium L. (Asteraceae). Seed Sci. Technol. 21: 187–195. Google Scholar

35.

Perez-Garcia, F., and Duran, J.M. 1990. The effect of gibberellic acid on germination of Onopordum nervosum Boiss. Seed Sci. Technol. 18: 83–88. Google Scholar

36.

Peters, J. 2000. Tetrazolium testing handbook contribution no. 29 to the handbook on seed testing. 1st revision. Association of Official Seed Analysts, Lincoln, NE. Google Scholar

37.

Qaderi, M.M. 1998. Intraspecific variation in germination of Scotch thistle (Onopordum acanthium L.) cypselas. M.Sc. thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, ON. Google Scholar

38.

Qaderi, M.M., and Cavers, P.B. 2000. Interpopulation variation in germination responses of Scotch thistle, Onopordum acanthium L., to various concentrations of GA3, KNO3, and NaHCO3. Can. J. Bot. 78: 1156–1163. Google Scholar

39.

Qaderi, M.M., and Cavers, P.B. 2002. Interpopulation and interyear variation in germination in Scotch thistle, Onopordum acanthium L., grown in a common garden: genetics vs. environment. Plant Ecol. 162: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020301912965Google Scholar

40.

Qaderi, M.M., and Cavers, P.B. 2003. Effects of dry heat on the germinability and viability of Scotch thistle (Onopordum acanthium) cypselas: interpopulation and interposition variation. Can. J. Bot. 81: 684–697. https://doi.org/10.1139/b03-062Google Scholar

41.

Qaderi, M.M., Cavers, P.B., and Bernards, M.A. 2003. Isolation and structural characterization of a water-soluble germination inhibitor from Scotch thistle (Onopordum acanthium) cypselas. J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 2425–2438. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026397532000Google Scholar

42.

Qaderi, M.M., Presti, A., and Cavers, P.B. 2005. Dry storage effects on germinability of Scotch thistle (Onopordum acanthium) cypselas. Acta Oecol. 27: 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2004.09.004Google Scholar

43.

Qaderi, M.M., Cavers, P.B., Hamill, A.S., and Bernards, M.A. 2012. Effects of collection time and after-ripening on chemical constituents and germinability of Scotch thistle (Onopordum acanthium) cypselas. Botany, 90: 755–762. https://doi.org/10.1139/b2012-035Google Scholar

44.

Ren, Y.Q., and Guan, K.Y. 2008. Effects of moist chilling and GA3 applications on seed germination of three Pedicularis species from Yunan, China. Seed Sci. Technol. 36: 225–229. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2008.36.1.27Google Scholar

45.

Roberts, H.A., and Chancellor, R.J. 1979. Periodicity of seedling emergence and achene survival in some species of Carduus, Cirsium and Onopordu m. J. Appl. Ecol. 16: 641–647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2402538Google Scholar

46.

Rogis, C., Gibson, L.R., Knapp, A.D., and Horton, R. 2004. Enhancing germination of eastern gamagrass seed with stratification and gibberellic acid. Crop Sci. 44: 549–552. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.5490Google Scholar

47.

Schelin, M., Tigabu, M., Eriksson, I., Sawadogo, L., and Oden, P.C. 2003. Effect of scarification, gibberellic acid and heat treatments on the germination of Balanites aegyptiaca seeds from the Sudanian savanna in Burkina Faso. Seed Sci. Technol. 31: 605–617. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2003.31.3.10Google Scholar

48.

Schuster, M., and Prather, T.S. 2003. Scotch thistle (Onopordum acanthium). Pacific Northwest Extension Publication, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. PNW 569. Google Scholar

49.

Schutte, B.J., Regnier, E.E., and Harrison, S.K. 2012. Seed dormancy and adaptive seedling emergence timing in giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Weed Sci. 60: 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-d-11-00049.1Google Scholar

50.

Scifres, C.J., and McCarty, M.K. 1969. Some factors affecting germination and seedling growth of Scotch thistle. Res. Bull Nebr. Agric. Exp. Stn. 228: 1–29. Google Scholar

51.

Shanmugavalli, M., Renganayaki, P.R., and Menaka, C. 2007. Seed dormancy and germination improvement treatments in fodder sorghum. J. SAT Agric. Res. 3: 1–3. Google Scholar

52.

Shim, S.I., Moon, J.C., Jang, C.S., Raymer, P., and Kim, W. 2008. Effect of potassium nitrate priming on seed germination of seashore paspalum. HortScience, 43(7): 2259–2262. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.43.7.2259Google Scholar

53.

Smith, H.A., Johnson, W.S., Scott Shonkwiler, J., and Swanson, S.R. 1999. The implications of variable or constant expansion rates in invasive weed infestations. Weed Res. 47: 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500090664Google Scholar

54.

Tang, D.S., Hamayun, M., Ko, Y.M., Zhang, Y.P., Kang, S.M., and Lee, I.J. 2008. Role of red light, temperature, stratification and nitrogen in breaking seed dormancy of Chenopodium album L. Crop Sci. 11: 199–204. Google Scholar

55.

Toole, E.H., and Brown, E. 1946. Final results of the Duvel buried seed experiment. J. Agric. Res. 72: 201–210. Google Scholar

56.

Xu, C.T., and De, K.J. 1996. Germination of Melilotoides ruthenicus seed treated with different ways. Chin. Qinghai J. An. Vet. Sci. 26: 4–6. Google Scholar

57.

Young, J.A., and Evans, R.A. 1969. Control and ecological studies of Scotch thistle. Weed Sci. 17: 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500030903Google Scholar

58.

Young, J.A., and Evans, R.A. 1972. Germination and persistence of achenes of Scotch thistle. Weed Sci. 20: 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500035049Google Scholar
© 2022 The Author(s) Sarabi and Chitband and Razi University.
Vahid Sarabi, Alireza Bagheri, and Ali Asghar Chitband "Evaluation of different methods for breaking cypsela dormancy in two local populations of Scotch thistle (Onopordum acanthium L.) collected from the west and northwest of Iran," Canadian Journal of Plant Science 102(4), 902-910, (15 August 2022). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2021-0234
Received: 27 October 2021; Accepted: 11 April 2022; Published: 15 August 2022
KEYWORDS
chemical scarification
cold and chemical stratification
cypselas
dormance physiologique des graines
graine
physiological seed dormancy
scarification chimique
Back to Top