Comparing functional similarity in reconstructed ecosystems with natural benchmarks can provide ecologically meaningful information to measure reclamation success. We examined nutrient supply rate using ion-exchange resins as a measure of ecosystem function in two oil sands reclaimed soils, viz. peat mineral mix (PMM) and forest floor mineral mix (FFMM), and measured fertilization effect on nutrient supply rates in these soils for three consecutive years contrasted with young-fire-disturbed and mature forest stands. Results indicated that nutrient profiles of reclaimed soils were significantly different than natural benchmarks. Phosphorus and potassium supply rates in reclaimed soils were up to 91% lower, whereas S, Ca, and Mg were, respectively, up to 95%, 62%, and 74% higher than in benchmark soils. The expected nutrient flush postfertilization was only apparent in N and P, but the transient effect levelled off the year after fertilization in most cases. Fertilization aligned the temporal trajectory of the nutrient profile in PMM similar to benchmark conditions indicating greater ecological benefit of fertilization than in FFMM. The findings from this study suggest that fertilization focusing on P and K is likely more ecologically appropriate for establishing natural ecosystem function on reclaimed soils in this region of the boreal forest.
You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither BioOne nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the BioOne website.
Vol. 97 • No. 2