How to translate text using browser tools
10 February 2018 Comparing the performance of the DNDC, Holos, and VSMB models for predicting the water partitioning of various crops and sites across Canada
Geoffrey Guest, Ward Smith, Brian Grant, Brian McConkey, Aston Chipanshi, Keith Reid, Roland Kroebel, Myra Martel, Raymond Desjardins, Andrew VanderZaag, Elizabeth Pattey, Aaron Glenn, Henry Wilson, Hambaliou Balde, Claudia Wagner-Riddle, Craig F. Drury, Keith Fuller, Masaki Hayashi, Dan Reynolds
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Accurately accounting for water budgets within regional agroecosystems is becoming an increasingly important practice, as both climate change and water consumption pressures have the potential for influencing agro-productivity and other water use activities. In this study, water budget measurements from 10 rainfed experimental sites across Canada were utilized to evaluate the performance of three models for their water partitioning capabilities: denitrification–decomposition (DNDC), Holos, and versatile soil moisture budget (VSMB). To assess the likely model performance at an upscaled national level, the models were applied at the site level with no water component-specific calibration. Evapotranspiration (ET) was found to be the dominate component of the water budget at the prairie sites (89%–149% of precipitation) (i.e., in comparison to runoff, tile drainage, and deep percolation), while both ET (37%–73% of precipitation) and drainage (19%–61% of precipitation) represented most of the water outflow budget at the sites in eastern and Atlantic Canada. As DNDC integrates daily crop growth dynamics with nitrogen, water, and heat stresses, in contrast to VSMB and Holos, which only utilize a water budget model, it was not surprising to find that DNDC consistently out-performed the other two models across all the statistical performance metrics considered at daily resolution.

© Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada 2018. Permission for reuse (free in most cases) can be obtained from RightsLink.
Geoffrey Guest, Ward Smith, Brian Grant, Brian McConkey, Aston Chipanshi, Keith Reid, Roland Kroebel, Myra Martel, Raymond Desjardins, Andrew VanderZaag, Elizabeth Pattey, Aaron Glenn, Henry Wilson, Hambaliou Balde, Claudia Wagner-Riddle, Craig F. Drury, Keith Fuller, Masaki Hayashi, and Dan Reynolds "Comparing the performance of the DNDC, Holos, and VSMB models for predicting the water partitioning of various crops and sites across Canada," Canadian Journal of Soil Science 98(2), 212-231, (10 February 2018). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2017-0112
Received: 11 October 2017; Accepted: 10 January 2018; Published: 10 February 2018
JOURNAL ARTICLE
20 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
bilan hydrique
DNDC
drainage
evapotranspiration
évapotranspiration
Holos
VSMB
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top