Turtles face unique conservation challenges in modern modified river systems. Despite their ecological importance, gaps in knowledge still exist that may hinder their conservation. Turtle by-catch data from the US Army Corps of Engineers' Long-Term Resource Monitoring Program were analyzed for 5 turtle species (false map turtle, Graptemys pseudogeographica; red-eared slider, Trachemys scripta; common snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina; smooth softshell turtle, Apalone mutica; and spiny softshell turtle, Apalone spinifera) to better understand macrohabitat and mesohabitat use. These species demonstrated differences in habitat use between various macrohabitats, substrata, velocity classes, and depth classes. Common snapping turtles and spiny softshell turtles were captured most often in tributaries, whereas red-eared sliders were captured most often in tributaries and closed side channels. Smooth softshell turtles used open side channels and unstructured main-channel borders most often. False map turtles were found in a variety of macrohabitats, but catch was highest near main-channel wing dikes. Shallow, low-velocity habitat seems most important to turtles. Turtle-specific sampling methods should be employed to learn more about turtles in the middle Mississippi River.
You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither BioOne nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the BioOne website.
Vol. 15 • No. 1