Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2009 Food Habits of Wild Silky Anteaters (Cyclopes didactylus) of São Luis do Maranhão, Brazil
Author Affiliations +

Introduction

None of the four extant anteater species is currently considered to be threatened with extinction (IUCN, 2007; Aguiar and Fonseca, 2008). However, the destruction and fragmentation of their habitat is advancing swiftly throughout their common distribution, and may already have caused local extinctions (Fonseca and Aguiar, 2004; Fallabrino and Castiñeira, 2006). Similarly, fragmentation may expose wild populations to new parasites and infectious diseases, while also increasing the risk of transmission between human and animal populations (Aguirre et al., 2002).

Local extinctions can have damaging effects on ecosystems by causing interruptions in key ecological processes, eventually compromising their integrity. Similarly, they can lead to the loss of populations that are especially important for the genetic diversity of a species, such as isolated populations that have evolved—or are evolving—into different subspecies (Frankham et al., 2002).

The silky anteater (Cyclopes didactylus) is the smallest extant anteater, with a body length of approximately 35 cm and a tail length of 20 cm, and a body weight of approximately 500 grams. Its exclusively arboreal and nocturnal habits (Montgomery, 1985a) may explain why it is one of the least-studied of the xenarthrans. C. didactylus has recently been removed from the Myrmecophagidae and is now classified in the monotypic Cyclopedidae (Gardner, 2005). Its range includes the tropical forests of Central and South America, but the species is divided into northern and southern populations by the Andes, which present a significant barrier to its distribution. The silky anteater's low metabolic rate, low body temperature (around 33°C) and its reduced ability to thermoregulate all limit its distribution to forests below 1500 m (McNab, 1985). In the northern part of their distribution, individuals have golden fur, but farther to the south this coloration becomes greyer, with a dark dorsal line (Dickman, 1984). An isolated population has been reported from coastal northeastern Brazil (Fonseca and Aguiar, 2004), separated from the Amazonian populations by the xeric Caatinga landscape. Although populations are affected by rapid deforestation and habitat loss throughout its range (Novaes, 2007), the silky anteater is classified as Least Concern by the IUCN (Fonseca and Aguiar, 2004; IUCN, 2007).

Information on their ecology is scarce. Although silky anteaters are predominantly arboreal, they do not have an opposable hallux. Each forelimb bears two digits with strong curved claws that allow them to firmly cling to branches; their strong prehensile tail is used for support, especially when they are using their claws for defense or to rip open ant nests. Information on the food habits of silky anteaters is limited to Best and Harada (1985) and Montgomery (1985b), who argue that their main food item seems to be ants, although Best and Harada (1985) also observed a low number of beetles in fecal samples. These studies involved individuals from the two main segments of the species' distribution (represented by Manaus and Barro Colorado Island, respectively); the isolated population of silky anteaters in Brazil, however, has not yet been thoroughly studied. As part of an ongoing project on the ecology and health of this small coastal population, we had the opportunity to examine the gastrointestinal contents of two recently deceased individuals. The results presented here contribute to the knowledge of this elusive species, and will help in understanding their habitat needs and in developing conservation strategies.

Materials and Methods

Study area

Maranhão is the second-largest state in Brazil, with approximately 330,000 km2 of land area and 640 km of coastline. The island of São Luis, on the state's northern coast, is a narrow peninsula of 905 km2 between the Rios Mearim and Itapicuru; it is cut off from the mainland by a narrow channel, the Estreito da Carapanñ (“Mosquito Strait”). There are three towns and several villages on the island, in addition to Maranhão's capital city of São Luis. It has a moist tropical climate; most of its yearly precipitation of 2083 mm falls between January and June. The dry season lasts from July to December, but is most intense in September, October and November; the ambient temperature during this time varies between 24-30°C. The vegetation is diverse and consists of uncultivated environments of secondary growth composed mostly of grasses and shrubs of Baccharis spp. (capoeira), interspersed with babassu palms (Attalaea speciosa) and jucúm palms (Bactris setosa). Açaí palms (Euterpe edulis) and buriti palms (Mauritia flexuosa) can be found in humid areas. Marshlands and a diverse flora of native fruit trees also exist on the island (Novaes, 2007), and narrow rivers lined with mangroves are present throughout.

Sample collection and analysis

Two dead specimens of Cyclopes didactylus were received by the Centro de Triagem de Animais Selvagens in Maranhão (CETASMA/IBAMA), an agency of the Brazilian government dedicated to rehabilitating animals rescued from the wildlife trade. According to the locals who had delivered them to the Rescue Center, the animals were found in forest fragments on the island of São Luis do Maranhão (02°31′ S, 44°16′ W; Fig. 1).

Intestinal contents and feces were collected during necropsies and preserved in 70% ethyl alcohol. They were shipped to the Morphology and Biochemistry Laboratory of the Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) São Vicente, in the state of São Paulo, for analysis. The composition of intestinal contents and feces was analyzed under a dissecting microscope based on characteristics of size and shape, following Palacio and Fernández (2003). Following examination, the specimens were conserved by IBAMA, the parent agency of CETASMA.

Figure 1a.

Approximate locality for the silky anteaters analyzed in this study. 1b. Typical habitat of silky anteaters in Maranhão. (Map by Embrapa; photo by Flávia Miranda.)

Results

The gastrointestinal tract of the silky anteaters contained fragments of formicid ants belonging to four genera: Camponotus, Dolichoderus, Pseudomyrmex and Solenopsis (Table 1), as well as trace fragments of ant nests.

All the ants identified from the gastrointestinal tract of one silky anteater, and 18.5% of the ants found in the intestines of the other, were of the genus Camponotus. This genus comprises over 1000 species, with at least 400 of them living in the Neotropics. Many Camponotus species are arboreal and nocturnal (Dejean et al., 2003; Delabie et al., 2003), although they may be found foraging during the day. All known species are omnivorous (Hölldobler and Wilson, 1990; Fernández, 2003a).

One morphospecies of Dolichoderus accounted for 26% of the gastrointestinal contents of the first specimen. Sixty-four of the 164 described species are Neotropical (Cuezzo, 2003). These ants are mainly arboreal and very active in tropical forests, especially in rainforests (Cuezzo, 2003). They can be very abundant in some trees, and may be found with ant-gardens, in which ants actively propagate selected seeds (Dejean et al., 2003; Delabie et al., 2003). They are considered omnivores (Hölldobler and Wilson, 1990; Cuezzo, 2003) and can be active during the day or at night.

The genus Pseudomyrmex (subfamily Pseudomyrmicinae) represented only a modest proportion (7.4%) of the gastrointestinal contents of the first specimen. These ants can be found in tropical wet forests, savannas, and occasionally in cold regions (Ward, 2003). They usually live in the arboreal substrate, where they make their nests in dead branches (Ward, 1991, 2003; Delabie et al., 2003). Some are obligate inhabitants of myrmecophilous plants, such as Triplaris brasiliensis (Hölldobler and Wilson, 1990; Ward, 2003) and some species tend scale insects (Coccoidea; Ward, 2003).

Ants of the genus Solenopsis (subgenus Diplorhoptrum) accounted for almost half of the identified food items of the first specimen; these ants are usually found in leaf litter (Fernández, 2003b). Giant anteaters (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) of the Pantanal of Nhecolândia have been reported to ingest large quantities of these ants (Medri et al., 2003).

Discussion

The gastrointestinal contents of these two silky anteaters were comprised largely, if not entirely, of arboreal ants. The best-represented genera were Camponotus and Dolichoderus, which are among the six most abundant ant genera of the Neotropical rainforest canopy (Torbin, 1991), and Solenopsis, which are commonly found on trees and with ant-gardens (for a review, see Huxley and Cutler, 1991). Solenopsis (subgenus Diplorhoptrum, thief ants) is a conspicuous group in leaf litter that needs taxonomic review (Fernández, 2003b) to clarify the biology of its South American species. However, S. (Diplorhoptrum) picta and S. (D.) corticalis from North and Central America are arboreal and inhabit coastal and mangrove areas (Thompson, 1989), similar to the potential Cyclopes habitat on Ilha São Luis. Given the scant knowledge of the silky anteater s behavior, we do not know whether these individuals ingested Solenopsis while foraging in the forest canopy, or whether they sometimes descend to the ground and thus may have fed upon them in the leaf litter. We also suspect that Pseudomyrmex ants were rarely ingested because they are aggressive, fast-moving and solitary foragers that may be difficult to capture; this would support the findings of Best and Harada (1985).

TABLE 1.

Number of morphospecies and percentage of ant genera found in the gastrointestinal tracts of two specimens of Cyclopes didactylus.

In contrast to our observations, however, and the findings of Montgomery (1985b), the feces of C. didactylus that Best and Harada (1985) collected in the vicinity of Manaus also contained very small amounts (0.1%) of coleopteran fragments. In addition, the silky anteaters studied by both Montgomery (1985b) and Best and Harada (1985) had fed on a greater diversity of ants than our study animals. Although Best and Harada (1985) suggested that a silky anteater opportunistically ingests any ant it can find, our findings suggest that the diet of silky anteaters on the island of São Luis is very specific, potentially consisting only of arboreal ant species.

The ecological advantage for Cyclopes to consume only arboreal ants appears to be in terms of biomass. Ants are more abundant than other arthropods in the forest canopy (Adis et al., 1984) and can contribute to more than half of the total arthropod dry weight (Torbin, 1991). Ants obtain most of their energy from nectar and pollen, and the canopy ants could effectively function as primary consumers (Torbin, 1991). A predator feeding exclusively on arboreal ants could thus obtain most of its energy close to the base of the trophic pyramid. Our conclusion is supported by the findings of Montgomery (1985b), who determined that for the Cyclopes of Barro Colorado Island, the ant species ingested in the dry season differed only slightly from those consumed during the wet season, suggesting that the silky anteaters fed only on a certain subset of available ants. Moreover, only 12% of the ant morphospecies found in Cyclopes stomach contents had also been ingested by sympatric Tamandua mexicana, indicating that the silky anteaters did not feed on all ant species that exist in the area.

The lack of information on the ant fauna of Ilha São Luis does not allow us to evaluate whether silky anteaters feed on all available arboreal ants, or if they selectively ingest certain species. Half of the ant genera in our samples (Camponotus and Pseudomyrmex) are solitary foragers, which conflicts with Montgomery's (1985b) observations that silky anteaters only forage on nests and covered ant trails, but not on individual ants. It is important to note that no termites have been identified in any dietary study of Cyclopes carried out to date (Best and Harada, 1985; Montgomery, 1985b; this study). Silky anteaters thus seem to have a much more specific diet than Tamandua or Myrmecophaga.

Conclusions

The present study suggests that the diet of Cyclopes inhabiting Ilha São Luis is based on a limited diversity of food items, mainly arboreal ants, although it is clear that more samples need to be analyzed to confirm this first approximation. Deforestation is advancing swiftly through the study area (Miranda, personal observation), which could soon put at risk the silky anteaters habitat and food resources. Further studies on the ecology of this nocturnal mammal are urgently needed, and the implementation of conservation units that can support the survival of these species should be encouraged. Environmental education programs should be initiated to involve the local population and teach them the importance of preserving the biodiversity of the Amazon biome.

Acknowledgements

We thank IBAMA- Regional Maranhão for providing the samples and information, Marcio Port for technical information, and the staff of UNESP, Jaboticabal Campus, for their collaboration. The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and the IUCN Edentate Specialist Group provided generous financial support. FJZ also thanks FAPESP (proc. 2005/4707-5).

References

  1. J. Adis , Y. D. Lubin and G. G. Montgomery 1984. Arthropods from the canopy of inundated and terra firme forests near Manaus, Brazil, with critical considerations on the pyrethrum-fogging technique. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 19: 223–236. Google Scholar

  2. J. M. Aguiar and G. A. B. da. Fonseca 2008. Conservation status of the Xenarthra. In: The Biology of the Xenarthra, W. J. Loughry and S. F. Vizcaíno (eds.), pp.215–231. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Google Scholar

  3. A. Aguirre , R. S. Ostfeld and G. M. Tabor 2002. Conservation Medicine: Ecological Health in Practice. Oxford University Press, New York. Google Scholar

  4. C. R. C. Best and A. Y. Harada 1985. Food habits of the silky anteater (Cyclopes didactylus) in the central Amazon. J. Mammal. 66: 780–781. Google Scholar

  5. F. Cuezzo 2003. Subfamilia Dolichoderinae. In: Introducción a las Hormigas de la Región Neotropical, F. Fernández (ed.), pp.291–298. Instituto de Investigacion de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia. Google Scholar

  6. A. Dejean , B. Corbara , F. Fernandez and J. H. C. Delabie 2003. Mosaicos de hormigas arbóreas en bosques y plantaciones tropicales. In: Introducción a las Hormigas de la Región Neotropical, F. Fernández (ed.), pp. 149–158. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia. Google Scholar

  7. J. H. C. Delabie , M. Ospina and G. Zabala 2003. Relaciones entre hormigas y plantas: Una introducción. In: Introducción a las Hormigas de la Región Neotropical, F. Fernández (ed.), pp. 167–180. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia. Google Scholar

  8. C. R. Dickman 1984. Anteaters. In: The Encyclopedia of Mammah, D. Macdonald (ed.), pp.772–775. Facts On File Publications, New York. Google Scholar

  9. A. Fallabrino and E. Castineira 2006. Situación de los edentados en Uruguay. Edentata (7): 1–3. Google Scholar

  10. F. Fernández 2003a. Subfamilia Formicinae. In: Introducción a las Hormigas de la Región Neotropical, F. Fernandez (ed.), pp.299–306. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia. Google Scholar

  11. F. Fernández 2003b. Subfamilia Myrmicinae. In: Introducción a las Hormigas de la Región Neotropical, F. Fernández (ed.), pp.307–330. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia. Google Scholar

  12. G. A. B. da Fonseca and J. M. Aguiar 2004. The 2004 Edentate Species Assessment Workshop. Edentata (6): 1–26. Google Scholar

  13. R. Frankham , J. D. Ballou and D. A. Briscoe 2002. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

  14. A. L. Gardner 2005. Order Pilosa. In: Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd edition, D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder (eds.), pp. 100–103. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Google Scholar

  15. B. Hölldobler and E. O. Wilson 1990. The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

  16. C. B. Huxley and D. F. Cutler 1991. Ant-Plant Interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

  17. IUCN 2007. 2007 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.http://www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 13 June 2007. Google Scholar

  18. B. K. McNab 1985. Energetics, population biology and distribution of Xenarthrans, living and extinct. In: The Evolution and Ecology of Armadillos, Sloths, and Vermilinguas, G. G. Montgomery (ed.), pp.219–232. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

  19. I. M. Medri , G. Mourão and A. Harada 2003. Dieta de tamanduá-bandeira (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) no Pantanal da Nhecolândia, Brasil. Edentata (5): 29–34. Google Scholar

  20. G. G. Montgomery 1985a. Impact of Vermilinguas (Cyclopes, Tamandua: Xenarthra = Edentata) on arboreal ant populations. In: The Evolution and Ecology of Armadillos, Sloths, and Vermilinguas, G. G. Montgomery (ed.), pp.351–364. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

  21. G. G. Montgomery 1985b. Movements, foraging and food habits of the four extant species of Neotropical vermilinguas (Mammalia; Myrmecophagidae). In: The Evolution and Ecology of Armadillos, Sloths, and Vermilinguas, G. G. Montgomery (ed.), pp.365–377. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

  22. C. R. Novaes , F. E. J. Tarouco , S. E. M. Rangel and B. J. L. Dias 2007. Análise da sensibilidade ambiental da parte ocidental da Ilha do Maranhão. In: Anais do XIII Simpásio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil, 21–26 abril 2007, INPE (ed.), pp.4089–4096. Google Scholar

  23. E. E. Palacio and F. Fernández 2003. Claves para las subfamilias y génerös. In: Introducción a las Hormigas de la Región Neotropical, F. Fernández (ed.), pp.233–260. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia. Google Scholar

  24. C. R. Thompson 1989. The thief ants, Solenopsis molesta group, of Florida (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomologist 72: 268–283. Google Scholar

  25. J. E. Torbin 1991. A Neotropical rainforest canopy ant community: Some ecological considerations. In: Ant-Plant Interactions, C. B. Huxley and D. F. Cutler (eds.), pp.536–538. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

  26. P. S. Ward 1991. Phylogenetic analysis ofpseudomyrmecine ants associated with domatia-bearing plants. In: Ant-Plant Interactions, C. B. Huxley and D. F. Cutler (eds.), pp.335–352. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

  27. P. S. Ward 2003. Subfamilia Pseudomyrmicinae. In: Introducción a las Hormigas de la Región Neotropical, F. Fernández (ed.), pp.331–336. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia. Google Scholar

Flávia Miranda, Roberto Veloso, Mariella Superina, and Fernando José Zara "Food Habits of Wild Silky Anteaters (Cyclopes didactylus) of São Luis do Maranhão, Brazil," Edentata 2009(10), (1 December 2009). https://doi.org/10.1896/020.010.0109
Published: 1 December 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top