Competition theory suggests that a single resource should support one consumer species. However, competitive exclusion may be relaxed by periodic disturbances, temporal or spatial segregation of consumers, or fine-scale resource partitioning. This last mechanism may be especially common for competing phytophagous insects. Unlike many predators, herbivores rarely consume their entire prey item and often have specialized feeding modes on specific plant parts. Thus, different herbivore guilds may “avoid” each other, thereby facilitating their coexistence. I analyzed a simplified metabolic pool model that includes two herbivore types: a “leaf chewer” and a “phloem feeder.” Phytophagous insects with the same feeding mode never coexisted, but different guilds may coexist stably—depending on productivity of the carbohydrate pool, allocation to vegetative biomass, and defoliation rate. Differences in herbivore feeding mode are equivalent to fine scale resource partitioning, potentially within the individual plant. Thus, the addition of physiological detail changes the predictions of simple competition models and is relevant to weed biocontrol by informing decisions on which guilds of biocontrol agents to introduce.
You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither BioOne nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the BioOne website.