Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2000 FITNESS DIFFERENCES AMONG DIPLOIDS, TETRAPLOIDS, AND THEIR TRIPLOID PROGENY IN CHAMERION ANGUSTIFOLIUM: MECHANISMS OF INVIABILITY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR POLYPLOID EVOLUTION
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Theoretical models indicate that the evolution of tetraploids in diploid populations will depend on both the relative fitness of the tetraploid and that of the diploid-tetraploid hybrids. Hybrids are believed to have lower fitness due to imbalances in either the ploidy (endosperm imbalance) or the ratio of maternal to paternal genomes in their endosperm (genomic imprinting). In this study we created diploids, tetraploids, and hybrid triploids of Chamerion angustifolium from crosses between field-collected diploid and tetraploid plants and evaluated them at six life stages in a greenhouse comparison. Diploid offspring (from 2x × 2x crosses) had significantly higher seed production and lower biomass than tetraploid offspring (from 4x × 4x crosses). Relative to the diploid, the cumulative fitness of tetraploids was 0.67. In general, triploids (from 2x × 4x, 4x × 2x crosses) had significantly lower seed production, lower pollen viability, and higher biomass than diploid individuals. Triploid offspring derived from diploid maternal parents had lower germination rates, but higher pollen production than those with tetraploid mothers. Relative to diploids, the cumulative fitness of 2x × 4x triploids and 4x × 2x triploids was 0.12 and 0.06, respectively, providing some support for effect of differing maternal:paternal ratios and endosperm development as a mechanism of hybrid inviability. Collectively, the data show that tetraploids exhibit an inherent fitness disadvantage, although the partial viability and fertility of triploids may help to reduce the barrier to tetraploid establishment in sympatric populations.

Corresponding Editor: K. Holsinger

Tracy L. Burton and Brian C. Husband "FITNESS DIFFERENCES AMONG DIPLOIDS, TETRAPLOIDS, AND THEIR TRIPLOID PROGENY IN CHAMERION ANGUSTIFOLIUM: MECHANISMS OF INVIABILITY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR POLYPLOID EVOLUTION," Evolution 54(4), 1182-1191, (1 August 2000). https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[1182:FDADTA]2.0.CO;2
Received: 9 July 1999; Accepted: 1 January 2000; Published: 1 August 2000
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top