Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2000 THE ROLE OF THE USE OF DIFFERENT HOST PLANTS IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THE INVERSION POLYMORPHISM IN THE CACTOPHILIC DROSOPHILA BUZZATII
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Inversion polymorphisms often have been associated with fitness variation. Cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii has been used widely for the study of the maintenance of chromosomal variation. The purpose of this paper is to address the relative importance of variable selection regimes associated with the use of three different host cacti and antagonistic pleiotropy in the maintenance of chromosomal variation. Using homokaryotypic stocks derived from several lines homozygous for four second-chromosome arrangements, we show that inversions significantly affect first-instar larva to adult viability (VT), developmental time (DT) and adult thorax length (TL). We also show that the effects of inversions on DT and VT are dependent on the cactus rearing media. The effects of polymorphic gene arrangements on life-history traits suggest the existence of trade-offs between early and late fitness components. The dosage of arrangement 2st, the ancestral gene order, was negatively correlated with DT and TL, whereas flies carrying the derived arrangements 2j and 2jq7 had longer DTs and larger TLs. Arrangements 2st and 2jq7 increased viability, at least in one of the cactus media tested. Our results suggest that environmental heterogeneity, as represented by the use of different cactus hosts and the trade-off between DT and TL, may be involved in the maintenance of the polymorphism. In addition, our data suggest that the chromosomal phylogeny may be decoupled from the evolution of the genes affecting life-history traits linked to the inversion system.

Corresponding Editor: E. Zouros

Pedro Fernández Iriarte and Esteban Hasson "THE ROLE OF THE USE OF DIFFERENT HOST PLANTS IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THE INVERSION POLYMORPHISM IN THE CACTOPHILIC DROSOPHILA BUZZATII," Evolution 54(4), 1295-1302, (1 August 2000). https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[1295:TROTUO]2.0.CO;2
Received: 19 May 1999; Accepted: 1 March 2000; Published: 1 August 2000
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top