Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2017 Laboratory Evaluations of the Foraging Success of Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on Flowers and Extrafloral Nectaries: Potential use of Nectar Plants for Conservation Biological Control of Asian Citrus Psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae)
Author Affiliations +

Tamarixia radiata (Waterson) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) is a specialist parasitoid of late-instar nymphs of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Kuwayama) (Hemiptera: Liviidae), a vector of the causal agent of huanglongbing disease of citrus (Sapindales: Rutaceae). Tamarixia radiata is mass reared; however, parasitism levels following inundative releases have remained relatively low. One possible explanation for the low parasitism levels is the lack of sugar resources available for adult wasps in targeted release landscapes, such as abandoned commercial citrus groves and residential areas. Establishing nectar plants can be an effective means of increasing nutritional resources in targeted sites for biocontrol agents. Some eulophids forage effectively only on fully exposed nectaries, i.e., those unobstructed by other floral parts. Therefore, care must be taken to select plants that possess nectary architecture compatible with parasitoid morphology and foraging ability. A series of laboratory studies were undertaken as a first step to determine the potential for T. radiata to obtain sugar from natural sources in target landscapes. Following contact with a sugar spot on filter paper, the wasps engaged in stereotypical zigzagging movements, demonstrating that contact with sugar induced arrestment and induction of localized searching behavior. Tamarixia radiata fed on sugars found in nectar (sucrose, glucose, fructose) and honeydew (melizitose, raffinose), indicating that it should feed well on both nectar and honeydew resources. At the highest concentration tested (1 M), it preferred sucrose and melizitose, whereas at the lowest concentration tested (0.1 M), it preferred sucrose and glucose. There was no preference among sugars when tested at the 0.5 M concentration. Choice tests with wasps previously exposed to scented sucrose solution showed that the wasps were stimulated and attracted by nectar odor and could learn to associate a particular odor with the presence of nectar. Observations conducted with starved wasps on freshly cut sprigs of nectar plants showed that foraging success was highest on extrafloral nectaries and flowers with exposed nectaries. The wasps readily located the extrafloral nectaries on snap bean and cowpea, and fed on them for the majority of the observation periods. Likewise, they quickly located the fully exposed nectaries in the inflorescences of euphorbiaceous plants, such as Euphorbia heterophylla L. (Malpighiales: Euphorbiaceae). Foraging success declined in flowers with nectaries that were only partially exposed; the wasps' movements were deterred by floral parts or trichomes that obstructed the nectary. The wasps were unable to obtain nectar from composites and other plants with hidden nectaries. Overall, the results of these laboratory evaluations showed that T. radiata responds to sugars and chemical cues associated with nectaries and is capable of foraging on extrafloral nectaries and flowers with exposed nectaries.

The Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Kuwayama) (Hemiptera: Liviidae), vectors the causal agent of huanglongbing or citrus greening, a disease that is destroying citrus groves at an alarming rate (Grafton-Cardwell et al. 2013; Hall et al. 2013). Asian citrus psyllid readily moves between commercial citrus groves and nearby residential areas and abandoned groves, underscoring the need to suppress D. citri at the landscape level to reduce the threat of huanglongbing (Halbert & Manjunath 2004; Boina et al. 2009; Tiwari et al. 2010; Lewis-Rosenblum et al. 2015). Immatures of D. citri are highly vulnerable to predation by generalist predaceous arthropods such as lady beetles, lacewings, and hunting spiders (Michaud 2004; Qureshi & Stansly 2009; Chong 2010). Late-instars of D. citri also are vulnerable to attack by Tamarixia radiata (Waterson) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), an ectoparasite native to southern Asia (Chen & Stansly 2014a). In an attempt to suppress D. citri populations through inundative releases, T. radiata mass rearing programs have been established in Florida, Texas, and California. Abandoned citrus orchards and residential areas near commercial citrus groves are the primary target landscapes for D. citri suppression using releases of T. radiata; the frequency of insecticide applications used to suppress D. citri in commercial citrus groves renders them inhospitable to arthropod biological control agents (Qureshi et al. 2009, 2014; Hall & Nguyen 2010; Beloti et al. 2015).

Parasitism rates of Asian citrus psyllid by T. radiata have reached 70% at some localities in Florida (Hall & Rohrig 2015), but most reported parasitism levels in Florida and California have been much lower (Qureshi & Stansly 2009; Qureshi et al. 2009; Kistner et al. 2016). Females of T. radiata puncture nymphs of D. citri, killing them in the process, and feed on the nymphs' hemolymph, which provides protein and fat needed by female wasps to produce additional eggs (Chen & Stansly 2014b). Nymphal mortality from hemolymph feeding may be relatively high and may help explain why psyllid abundance has decreased in release areas with low parasitism levels (Kistner et al. 2016).

Several explanations (Qureshi & Stansly 2009; Hall & Nguyen 2010; Tena et al. 2013; Hall & Rohrig, 2015; Kistner et al. 2016) have been put forth to explain the low incidence of D. citri parasitism observed following release of T. radiata: 1) low genetic diversity of the released wasp haplotypes combined with poor performance by those haplotypes in their release environments; 2) intraguild predation by other natural enemies of D. citri; 3) interference from ants tending D. citri nymphs; 4) frequent trimming of shoots containing suitable or parasitized nymphs; 5) mortality inflicted by insecticide applications; and 6) adverse weather and climatic conditions.

Another limiting factor in wasp establishment may be a lack of non-host nutritional resources within the release site. The adults of many parasitoid species feed on nectar from flowers and extrafloral nectar glands, and on honeydew excreted by phloem-feeding insects (Leius 1960; Proctor & Yeo 1972 Jervis et al. 1993; Wäckers et al. 2005; Russell 2015). Sugar from these sources provides them with the energy needed to search for oviposition hosts and mates. In addition to hemolymph feeding, T. radiata also benefits from sugar feeding. For example, providing caged T. radiata wasps with honey improved their survivorship (Chen & Stansly 2014a), and mass rearing programs supply the wasps with diluted honey. In nature, T. radiata is known to feed on D. citri honeydew (Tena et al. 2013; Chen & Stansly 2014b), but it has not been observed feeding on floral or extrafloral nectar.

Augmentation with plants that provide floral and extrafloral nectar can be an effective means of increasing sugar resources in a variety of target landscapes (Leius 1967; Patt et al. 1997a; Landis et al. 2000; Ellis et al. 2005; Gurr et al. 2005; Heimpel & Jervis 2005; Wäckers et al. 2005; Fiedler et al. 2008; Lundgren 2009; Jonsson et al. 2010; Brennan 2013, 2016). In addition to sugars, extrafloral nectar has low concentrations of amino acids (Heil 2015); therefore, plants with extrafloral nectaries should be beneficial to T. radiata. Whether augmentation with nectar-producing plants in target landscapes will result in positively influencing T. radiata populations or not will necessitate evaluation of wasp retention and parasitism levels in experimental sites with nectar plants versus control sites lacking those plants.

The first step in this process is selecting candidate nectar plants for field testing. Because of their small size and lack of specialized mouthparts, certain chalcid wasp species can efficiently forage only in flowers with nectaries that are fully exposed or only slightly obstructed by petals or other floral parts (Patt et al. 1997b). They may have difficulty moving within folded or constricted floral structures to obtain nectar, or be repulsed by patches of trichomes on the petals or other floral parts. For these reasons, care must be taken to select plant species with floral architectures that are compatible with the morphology and foraging abilities of the target species. For example, many flowering ornamental plants have been bred for showy flowers, and their nectaries are either absent or hidden by multiple whorls of petals. If residential areas and commercial landscapes are the target landscape for T. radiata release, then nectar plants for these sites will need to have both the requisite floral architectures and ornamental value. Because extrafloral nectaries have evolved to be accessible to predaceous and parasitic arthropods (Wäckers et al. 2005; Lundgren 2009), and they have not been subjected to artificial selection, the selection of plant species with extrafloral nectaries with respect to nectary accessibility is less problematic.

Here we describe the results of a series of laboratory studies undertaken as a first step to determine the potential for T. radiata to obtain sugar from nectar plants in target landscapes. These studies examined 1) whether T. radiata foraging movements are arrested following contact with sugar; 2) whether T. radiata has a preference for sugars from either honeydew or nectar; 3) the ability of T. radiata to obtain nectar from extrafloral nectaries and from flowers that varied in their degree of nectary accessibility; and 4) whether T. radiata can learn to recognize chemosensory cues associated with nectar.

Materials and Methods


The T. radiata wasps used for these studies were provided by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, Florida. The wasps were shipped via overnight mail in vials containing water wicks and filter paper spotted with diluted honey (1:1 v/v honey-to-water ratio). Upon arrival, the wasps were transferred to nylon screen cages (30 cm L × 30 cm H × 30 cm W) supplied with water stations and filter paper spotted with diluted honey. The cages were held in an incubator with a temperature of 25 ± 1 °C and a 8:16 h L:D photoperiod. Wasps used in the tests were 7 to 14 d old. Aspirators were used to transfer the wasps from the holding cage to the experimental arenas. Only female wasps were used in the experiments.


Observations were conducted for T. radiata feeding behavior on sugars commonly present in either nectar (sucrose, glucose, fructose) or honeydew (maltose, raffinose, melizitose) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri) to determine if 1) foraging movements were arrested following contact with sugar; and 2) the wasps preferred sugars from honeydew or nectaries. Prior to the observations, the wasps were starved overnight in cages furnished with water dispensers to increase their hunger levels. For each observation, individual wasps were placed on a filter paper strip (5 mm wide × 25 mm long; No. 1, Qualitative, Whatman, Maidstone, United Kingdom) spotted with a 100 μL aliquot of a single test sugar. Three concentrations (0.1, 0.5, or 1.0 M) of each sugar solution were used in the tests.

To facilitate observation of the wasp's behavior, the paper strip was mounted to a clip that, in turn, was positioned under the objective of a stereomicroscope (Model SZX9, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Feeding behavior was verified by observing the wasp on a computer monitor connected to a video camera (Model acA1300-60g, Basler AG, Ahrensburg, Germany) mounted on the stereomicroscope. To control for thirst, control spots consisting of distilled water were also presented to the wasps. To assist the observer in visualizing the sugar spot and wasp feeding behavior, the solutions were colored light pink by the addition of 50 μL of red food coloring (McCormick & Co., Inc., Hunt Valley, Maryland) to 10 mL of each stock sugar solution and the water control. Each wasp was released within a few mm of the sugar spot and the observation initiated when the wasp began to crawl on the strip. Wasps that flew from the strip within 30 s after placement were excluded from the study.

Each observation lasted until the wasp flew from the strip or until 300 s had elapsed. The amount of time each wasp spent feeding on the sugar spot was recorded for each observation period. The numbers of wasps tested on each sugar—concentration treatment were as follows: sucrose (0.1 M: n = 14; 0.5 M: n = 21; 1.0 M: n = 36); melizitose (0.1 M: n = 6; 0.5 M: n = 14; 1.0 M: n = 19); raffinose (0.1 M: n = 5; 0.5 M: n = 13; 1.0 M: n = 10); glucose (0.1 M: n = 6; 0.5 M: n = 10; 1.0 M: n = 19); fructose (0.1 M: n = 3; 0.5 M: n = 10; 1.0 M: n = 19); and maltose (0.1 M: n = 6; 0.5 M: n = 8; 1.0 M: n = 7).


A series of observations were conducted to determine whether T. radiata could successfully forage for nectar from extrafloral nectaries and from the floral nectaries of plants that varied with respect to their floral architecture and horticultural, agronomic, and conservation utility. The plant species used in the observations were selected to encompass representatives exhibiting a variety of the following traits: 1) degree of nectary accessibility, i.e., fully exposed, partially exposed, partially hidden, and hidden (Fig. 1); 2) geographic origin, i.e., native species or exotic ornamental; and 3) utility, i.e., garden ornamental, agricultural groundcover, hardy in ruderal situations (Table 1). All of the candidate plant species selected for this study bloomed or produced extrafloral nectaries for 3 wk or more, because shorter nectarproduction times would discount their utility as nectar sources in target landscapes.

Test plants of each species were grown in pots in an outdoor research garden in Fort Pierce, Florida. Prior to the observations, inflorescences or sprigs with extrafloral nectaries were cut with a razor blade and placed in tap water; the submerged ends were cut again to prevent wilting and inserted into a 10 mL vial filled with tap water. The plant specimens were brought to the laboratory immediately and then positioned on the stage of a stereomicroscope for observation. Wasps were starved overnight, placed on flowers or extrafloral nectaries, and their foraging behavior observed until they left the sprig or 300 s had elapsed. The wasps were placed on the sprig a few mm below the flowers or extrafloral nectaries and allowed to move freely about the sprig, and were observed using the equipment described for the sugar preference experiment. Observations were facilitated by the use of a computer screen attached to a video camera mounted on the stereomicroscope. Observations were conducted between 10 AM and 3 PM. For each wasp, the durations of the following behaviors were scored: crawling, sitting, grooming, and feeding on nectar. The numbers of wasps tested on each plant species are shown in Table 1.


A choice test was performed to determine whether T. radiata could learn to recognize aroma cues associated with nectar. We followed the method used by Patt et al. (1999) to examine similar behavior in 2 other eulophid species. The choice test arena consisted of 16 individual cups (3 mm high × 4.0 mm wide) attached to the backside of a glass Petri dish (9.0 cm in diameter). The cups were arranged into an inner (3.0 cm diameter) and outer ring (3.5 cm in diameter) of 8 cups each, with each cup situated 5 mm apart from its nearest neighbor. Each cup contained a 10 μL aliquot of artificial nectar; the control nectar consisted of 1.0 M sucrose solution and the scented nectar consisted of a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of 1.0 M sucrose solution and banana flavor extract (McCormick & Co., Inc., Hunt Valley, Maryland) (after Lewis & Takasu 1990). The control and scented nectars were placed in alternating cups.

Wasps were starved overnight as described for the sugar preference experiment. At the beginning of the assay, a single wasp was placed on a filter paper strip spotted either with 1.0 M sucrose solution or a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of 1.0 M sucrose solution and banana flavor extract, and was allowed to feed for 60 s. The nectar solutions were colored pink as described for the sugar preference experiment. Wasps that failed to feed for the entire 60 s pre-test conditioning period were discarded. Following the pre-test conditioning period, the wasp was gently transferred with an artist's paintbrush (size 0) to the center of the test arena and then permitted to walk freely and choose among the individual cups.

Discovering the nectar required the wasp to crawl up the side of the cup and enter it. Each wasp was observed for 300 s or until it either discovered a nectary or left the test arena. For each experiment, the number of wasps that discovered each type of nectary was recorded, whereas wasps that left the arena or failed to enter a nectary cup were recorded as non-respondents. Wasps that left the arena within 30 s following placement were discounted from the test. Each wasp was tested only once. Forty-eight wasps were pre-test exposed to the control sucrose solution and 55 wasps were pre-test exposed to the sucrose and banana flavor extract solution.


For the sugar preference test, feeding times within the same sugar solution concentration were compared among the different sugars with the Kruskal—Wallis test (ANOVA) as the data did not meet parametric assumptions. Significant ANOVA was followed by pairwise multiple comparisons using the Dunn method (SigmaPlot? software, version 11.2.0, Systat Software, Inc. San Jose, California). This procedure was also used to compare the mean percentage of observation time spent feeding on the nectaries of the various plant species tested. In the test of conditioned responses to nectar odor, a log—likelihood test (G-test) with the Yate correction was used to compare each cup selection and pre-test exposure treatment combination (Zar 1999) using a 1:1 observed-to-expected ratio. A significance level of P ≤⃒ 0.05 was used in all statistical tests performed.

Fig. 1.

Diagrammatic representation of nectary architectures presented to Tamarixia radiata in foraging evaluations. Location of nectaries shown in red. A. Cyathium of euphorbiaceous species with exposed nectaries. B. Partially exposed nectaries as found in buckwheat. C. Partially hidden nectaries as found in alyssum. D. Partially exposed nectaries covered with trichomes as found in marjoram. E. Hidden nectaries as found in composites. Drawings are only indicative of size and spatial relationships and are not to scale.




When foraging T. radiata wasps contacted the sugar spot on the filter paper strip, they ceased movement and fed, showing that sugar feeding resulted in arrestment of the foraging movements. When presented with a water spot, the wasps drank briefly (mean ± SE = 9.1 ± 1.5 s, n = 32); conversely, they fed extensively when presented with a spot of 1.0 M sucrose solution (263 ± 9.1 s, n = 30). Following contact with the sugar spot, the wasps engaged in stereotypical zigzagging localized searching movements before returning to the spot to feed further. The wasps fed on sugars from both nectar and honeydew; only maltose was not fed upon (Fig. 2). At the highest concentration, a preference was shown for sucrose and melizitose (H = 36.52; df = 4; P ≤⃒ 0.001), and for fructose and glucose at the 0.1 M concentration (H = 21.61; df = 5; P ≤⃒ 0.001). No preference was shown among the sugars tested at the 0.5 M concentration. These results indicate that, in nature, T. radiata will feed on sugars from nectar as well as from honeydew.


Tamarixia radiata foraging success was highest on extrafloral nectaries and on flowers with exposed nectaries (Table 1) (H = 97.36; df = 12; P ≤⃒ 0.001). When placed near the extrafloral nectaries of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.; Fabaceae) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.; Fabaceae), all but one of the tested wasps located the extrafloral nectaries and the rest spent most of the observation period feeding on them. Likewise, most wasps readily located the completely exposed nectaries found in the inflorescences of plants in the family Euphor-biaceae, such as crown-of-thorns (Euphorbia milii des Moulins), wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla L.), grassleaved spurge (Euphorbia graminea Jacquin), and spotted spurge (Chamaesyce maculata [L.] Small) (Fig. 1A), and fed extensively on them.

Table 1.

Nectary accessibility and foraging success in T. radiata.


The wasps' foraging success noticeably declined in flowers with nectaries that were only partially exposed; they did not enter or search within floral tubes for nectar and seemed to be deterred by reflexed floral parts or trichomes obstructing the corolla aperture. For example, only half of the wasps on buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench; Polygonaceae) were able to locate the partially exposed nectaries of the flowers (Fig. 1B). On alyssum (Lobularia maritima [L.] Desvaux; Brassicaeae), whose flowers have partially hidden nectaries, the wasps searched between florets in the dense inflorescences, and some individuals successfully accessed the nectaries by probing through the clefts at the base of the sepals (Fig. 1C). However, only about a third of the wasps successfully located alyssum nectaries.

Although marjoram (Origanum majorana L.; Lamiaceae), pennyroyal (Piloblephis rigida (Bartram ex Benth.) Raf.; Lamiaceae), and frog fruit (Phyla nodiflora [L.] Greene; Verbenaceae) have open, shallow flowers with partially hidden nectaries, their petals and corolla tubes were covered with trichomes, which repulsed the wasps and prevented them from reaching the nectary (Fig. 1D). The wasps did not attempt to crawl into the narrow corollas of the 2 common composite species tested: Spanish needles, Bidens alba (L.) (Asteraceae), and Indian blanket, Gaillardia aestivalis (Walter) Rock (Asteraceae) (Fig. 1E). Contact with the pollen of these composites seemed to irritate them and resulted in extensive grooming.

Fig. 2.

Mean (± SE) feeding time of Tamarixia radiata when presented with different concentrations of sugars commonly occurring in nectar (sucrose, fructose, glucose) and honeydew (melizitose, raffinose). Bars within the same concentration having different letters are different at P ≤⃒ 0.05 (ANOVA).


The wasps did not enter the relatively deep floral tubes of 2 common garden ornamentals, tropical milkweed (Asclepias curassavica L.; Apocynaceae) and pentas (Pentas lanceolata [Forssk.] Deflers; Rubiaceae). The corolla tube of pentas contained numerous non-glandular trichomes that precluded entry by T. radiata, and the nectaries of milkweed were hidden within the hood-like coronal pouches. However, on both of these plants, the wasps scavenged on what appeared to be nectar deposits left on the petals and hoods by bees and butterflies.


The wasps that fed on the unscented sucrose solution showed no preference for cups with either the unscented or banana-scented artificial nectar, whereas the wasps that fed on the banana-scented sucrose showed a significant preference for the cups with the sucrose and banana flavor extract (G = 9.61; df = 1; P ≤⃒ 0.01) (Fig. 3). A similar proportion of wasps from each of the pre-test conditioning treatments did not choose a cup in the test arena (19% from the unscented control and 11% from the banana-scented treatment).


Scoring the foraging success of T. radiata on different types of nectaries in the laboratory was a straightforward means to identify the nectary architectures compatible with the wasp's foraging abilities. Specifically, T. radiata can forage only on plant species with flowers that have exposed nectaries, or on species with extrafloral nectaries. The value of evaluating the compatibility of nectar plants with target biocontrol agents has been shown in other situations in which conservation biological control parameters were being established (Wäckers 2004; Olson & Wäckers 2007; Sivinski et al. 2011; Géneau et al. 2012; Wäckers & van Rijn 2012; Russell 2015; Nave et al. 2016).

Fig. 3.

Choice of cups with either unscented sucrose solution or with bananascented sucrose solution made by Tamarixia radiata following a pre-test exposure to either 1.0 M sucrose solution or 1.0 M sucrose solution and banana flavor extract (G-test; ** = P ≤⃒ 0.01; NS = not significant).


Even with the wasps' limited foraging ability, a number of species could be considered as potential nectar plants, and all of them have horticultural and agronomic utility in citrus-growing regions. For example, cowpea is a nitrogen-fixing plant that can be used as a ground cover, green manure, or cattle forage. It grows well in hot climates and is fairly drought tolerant; some varieties tolerate root-knot nematode and other pests (Wang et al. 2006). Some native legumes with extrafloral nectaries, such as partridge pea (Chamaecrista fasciculata [Michx.] Greene; Fabaceae) and native cassias (Senna species; Fabaceae), grow on uplands adjacent to citrus orchards and provide extrafloral nectar for a variety of insect predators and parasitoids (Koptur et al. 2015). Passionflowers (Passiflora species; Passifloraceae) have extrafloral nectaries, and a number of ornamental and native species may be suitable nectar plants for T. radiata in gardens and border areas. Likewise, elderberry (Sambucus species; Adoxaceae) has large extrafloral nectaries (Mizell 2015) and is common near irrigation ditches adjacent to citrus groves. Whether ants would restrict to any appreciable degree the wasps' access to the extrafloral nectaries of any of these species needs to be examined (Tena et al. 2013).

Plants in the family Euphorbiaceae have numerous exposed floral nectaries that were readily visited by the wasp. Crown-of-thorns (E. milii) is a popular ornamental perennial available in a variety of colors and growth habits that are heat and drought tolerant. Two native poinsettia species, E. heterophylla and E. cyathophora (Murray) Griseb., thrive in ruderal areas and could grow in abandoned groves and along the borders of commercial groves. Weedy spurges, such as grassleaved spurge (E. graminea) and spotted spurge (C. maculata) may also provide nectar in these neglected areas. Interestingly, the ‘Diamond Frost’ ornamental cultivar of E. graminea has concave nectaries, giving them a partially hidden architecture that prevented T. radiata from foraging on them. So, although Diamond Frost has a much showier inflorescence than the weedy wild type, it is not a good nectar plant for T. radiata. Perhaps a new cultivar can be bred that would retain the showy white bracts while retaining an exposed nectary architecture. Likewise, showier cultivars of the long-day blooming E. heterophylla and E. cyathophora could be developed for use as ornamentals in gardens and other landscaped areas. Although it is used as an ornamental, the Christmas Poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. ex Klotzsch) is a short-day plant that blooms in the winter. In the winter months, D. citri reproduction is at an annual low (Hall et al. 2008), so E. pulcherrima would probably not have much utility as a nectar source for T. radiata.

Plants in the family Apiaceae were not examined, but further studies should test their potential as nectar plants. For example, dill (Anethum graveolens L.) has exposed nectaries that would likely be accessible to T. radiata (Patt et al. 1997a). However, dill may not grow well in the summer heat of citrus-producing areas and would have to be used in the early and later parts of the growing season. Two other eulophid species, Pediobius foveolatus (Crawford) and Edovum puttleri Grissell, readily forage on dill flowers. However, on another umbel species, cilantro (Coriandrum sativum L.), P. foveolatus was able to push past the flower's recurved petals to feed on the nectaries whereas E. puttleri could not do so (Patt et al. 1997b). In the current study, T. radiata also could not maneuver around recurved petals of cilantro florets to reach the nectaries. That 3 eulophid species of similar size displayed varying foraging success on the same plant species highlights the need to evaluate their foraging abilities on a case-by-case basis for the purpose of selecting potential nectar plant species for each of them.

Our future work will test whether nectar plants can maximize the survivorship and efficacy of T. radiata in residential landscapes and abandoned groves. Other studies have shown that augmenting residential landscapes with nectar plants can enhance biological control of certain pest species (Ellis et al. 2005; Rebek et al. 2006). Urban landscapes are amenable to a conservation biological control strategy because ecological disturbance tends to be minimal and these landscapes lend themselves to manipulations of plantings (Raupp et al. 1992; Shrewsbury & Raupp 2000; Tooker & Hanks 2000; Ellis et al. 2005). In contrast, abandoned citrus groves are challenging in this regard because the nectar plants must grow in ruderal conditions, compete with exotic grasses, and withstand drought conditions. Euphorbia heterophylla and partridge pea may be suitable nectar plants capable of growing in the agronomically challenging conditions found in abandoned citrus groves. Other native species that can tolerate ruderal conditions should be examined for their suitability as nectar plants for T. radiata.

For nectar plant augmentation to be a successful management strategy for T. radiata, several key questions will need to be addressed concerning the ecological relationship between T. radiata and potential nectar plant species within each type of target landscape. We will need to determine whether T. radiata will commute between the canopies of D. citri host plants and nectar plants growing at ground level. If they do commute, then we will need to determine 1) if there is an optimal spatial relationship between nectar plants and D. citri host plants, i.e., how localized is the effect of augmentative plantings of nectar plants; and 2) whether planting densities and species composition have effects on wasp establishment success and psyllid parasitism levels.

Lastly, the choice test demonstrated that T. radiata is stimulated by nectar odor and could learn to recognize olfactory cues associated with nectar. This finding suggests T. radiata can use olfactory cues to locate nectar sources, as has been shown for other parasitoid wasp species (Lewis & Takasu 1990; Lewis et al. 1998; Patt et al. 1999; Wäckers 2004; Zhu et al. 2013; Foti et al. 2016). Tests will need to be conducted to determine whether T. radiata wasps exposed to nectar odors during rearing are more adept at locating nectar sources following their release than odor-naïve wasps.


Funding for this research was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service. We thank the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services for providing T. radiata for testing. We gratefully acknowledge the laboratory assistance provided by A. Tarshis-Moreno, P. D'Aiuto, Frank Methany, and M. Kitiashvili. The manuscript was greatly improved by reviews provided by V. Kumar, D. Hall, J. Qureshi, J. Capinera, and an anonymous reviewer. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the United States Department of Agriculture for its use.

References Cited

  1. Beloti VH, Alves GR, Araújo DFD, Picoli MM, Moral RA, Demétrio CGB, Yamamoto PT. 2015. Lethal and sublethal effects of insecticides used on citrus, on the ectoparasitoid Tamarixia radiata. PLoS One:10: e0132128. Google Scholar
  2. Boina DR, Meyer WL, Onagbola EO, Stelinski LL. 2009. Quantifying dispersal of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) by immunomarking and potential impact of unmanaged groves on commercial citrus management. Environmental Entomology 38: 1250–1258. Google Scholar
  3. Brennan EB. 2013. Agronomic aspects of strip intercropping lettuce with alyssum for biological control of aphids. Biological Control 65: 302–311. Google Scholar
  4. Brennan EB. 2016. Agronomy of strip intercropping broccoli with alyssum for biological control of aphids. Biological Control 97: 109–119. Google Scholar
  5. Chen X, Stansly PA. 2014a. Biology of Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), parasitoid of the citrus greening disease vector Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae): a mini review. Florida Entomologist 97: 1404–1413. Google Scholar
  6. Chen X, Stansly PA. 2014b. Effect of holding on egg formation of Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), parasitoid of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psylloidae). Florida Entomologist 97: 491–495. Google Scholar
  7. Chong JH, Roda AL, Mannion CM. 2010. Density and natural enemies of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), in the residential landscape of southern Florida. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 27: 33–49. Google Scholar
  8. Ellis JA, Walter AD, Tooker JF, Ginzel MD, Reagel PF, Lacey ES, Bennett AB, Grossman EM, Hanks LM. 2005. Conservation biological control in urban landscapes: manipulating parasitoids of bagworms (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) with flowering forbs. Biological Control 34: 99–107. Google Scholar
  9. Fiedler AK, Landis DA, Wratten SD. 2008. Maximizing ecosystem services from conservation biological control: the role of habitat management. Biological Control 45: 254–271. Google Scholar
  10. Foti MC, Rostás M, Peri E, Park KC, Slimani T, Wratten SD, Colazza S. 2016. Chemical ecology meets conservation biological control: identifying plant volatiles as predictors of floral resource suitability for an egg parasitoid of stink bugs. Journal of Pest Science [Epub ahead of print] Google Scholar
  11. Géneau CE, Wäckers FL, Luka H, Daniel C, Balmer O. 2012. Selective flowers to enhance biological control of cabbage pests by parasitoids. Basic and Applied Ecology 13: 85–93. Google Scholar
  12. Grafton-Cardwell EE, Stelinski LL, Stansly PA. 2013. Biology and management of Asian citrus psyllid, vector of huanglongbing pathogens. Annual Review of Entomology 58: 413–432. Google Scholar
  13. Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Tylianakis J, Kean J, Keller M. 2005. Providing plant foods for natural enemies in farming systems: balancing practicalities and theory, pp. 326–340 In Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ, Bruin J [eds.], Plant-Provided Food for Carnivore Insects: A Protective Mutualism and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar
  14. Halbert SE, Manjunath KL. 2004. Asian citrus psyllids (Sternorrhyncha: Psyllidae) and greening disease of citrus: a literature review and assessment of risk in Florida. Florida Entomologist 87: 330–353. Google Scholar
  15. Hall DG, Nguyen R. 2010. Toxicity of pesticides to Tamarixia radiata, a parasitoid of the Asian citrus psyllid. Biocontrol 55: 601–611. Google Scholar
  16. Hall DG, Rohrig E. 2015. Bionomics of Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae) associated with orange jasmine hedges in southeast central Florida, with special reference to biological control by Tamarixia radiata. Journal of Economic Entomology 108: 1198–1207. Google Scholar
  17. Hall DG, Heintz MG, Adair, RC. 2008. Population ecology and phenology of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in two Florida citrus groves. Environmental Entomology 37: 914–924. Google Scholar
  18. Hall DG, Richardson ML, Ammar E-D, Halbert SE. 2013. Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, vector of citrus huanglongbing disease. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 146: 207–223. Google Scholar
  19. Heil M. 2015. Extrafloral nectar at the plant—insect interface: a spotlight on chemical ecology, phenotypic plasticity, and food webs. Annual Review of Entomology 60: 213–232. Google Scholar
  20. Heimpel GE, Jervis MA. 2005. Does floral nectar improve biological control by parasitoids? Pp. 267–304 In Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ Bruin, J. [eds.], Plant-Provided Food for Carnivore Insects: A Protective Mutualism and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar
  21. Jervis MA, Kidd NAC, Fitton MG, Huddleston T, Dawah HA. 1993. Flower-visiting by hymenopteran parasitoids. Journal of Natural History 27: 67–105. Google Scholar
  22. Jonsson M, Wratten SD, Landis DA, Tompkins J-ML, Cullen R. 2010. Habitat manipulation to mitigate the impacts of invasive arthropod pests. Biological Invasions 12: 2933–2945. Google Scholar
  23. Kistner EJ, Amrich R, Castillo M, Strode V, Hoddle MS. 2016. Phenology of Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae), with special reference to biological control by Tamarixia radiata, in the residential landscape of southern California. Journal of Economic Entomology [Epub ahead of print] Google Scholar
  24. Koptur S, Jones IM, Peña JE. 2015. The influence of host plant extrafloral nectaries on multitrophic interactions: An experimental investigation. PLoS One 10: e0138157. Google Scholar
  25. Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM. 2000. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 45: 175–201. Google Scholar
  26. Leius K. 1960. Attractiveness of different foods and flowers to the adults of some hymenopterous parasites. The Canadian Entomologist 92: 369–376. Google Scholar
  27. Leius K. 1967. Influence of wild flowers on parasitism of tent caterpillar and codling moth. The Canadian Entomologist 99: 444–446. Google Scholar
  28. Lewis WJ, Takasu K. 1990. Use of learned odours by a parasitic wasp in accordance with host and food needs. Nature 348: 635–636. Google Scholar
  29. Lewis WJ, Stapel JO, Cortesero AM, Takasu K. 1998. Understanding how parasitoids balance food and host needs: importance to biological control. Biological Control 11: 175–183. Google Scholar
  30. Lewis-Rosenblum H, Martini X, Tiwari S, Stelinski LL. 2015. Seasonal movement patterns and long-range dispersal of Asian citrus psyllid in Florida citrus. Journal of Economic Entomology 108: 3–10. Google Scholar
  31. Lundgren JG. 2009. Relationships of Natural Enemies and Non-Prey Foods. Springer Science and Business Media B. V., Dordrecht, Netherlands. Google Scholar
  32. Michaud JP. 2004. Natural mortality of Asian citrus psyllid (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in central Florida. Biological Control 29: 260–269. Google Scholar
  33. Mizzell RF. 2015. Many plants have extrafloral nectaries helpful to beneficials. University of Florida/Institute of Food and Agricultural Science Extension, Document ENY-709. Google Scholar
  34. Nave A, Gonçalves F, Crespi AL, Campos M, Torres L. 2016. Evaluation of native plant flower characteristics for conservation biological control of Prays oleae. Bulletin of Entomological Research 106: 249–257. Google Scholar
  35. Olson DM, Wäckers FL. 2007. Management of field margins to maximize multiple ecological services. Journal of Applied Ecology 44: 13–21. Google Scholar
  36. Patt JM, Hamilton GC, Lashomb JH. 1997a. Impact of strip-insectary intercropping with flowers on conservation biological control of the Colorado potato beetle. Advances in Horticultural Science 11: 175–181. Google Scholar
  37. Patt JM, Hamilton GC, Lashomb JH. 1997b. Foraging success of parasitoid wasps on flowers: interplay of insect morphology, floral architecture and searching behavior. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 83: 21–30. Google Scholar
  38. Patt JM, Hamilton GC, Lashomb JH. 1999. Responses of two parasitoid wasps to nectar odors as a function of experience. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90: 1–8. Google Scholar
  39. Proctor M, Yeo P. 1972 The Pollination of Flowers. Taplinger Publishing Co., New York City, New York. Google Scholar
  40. Qureshi JA, Stansly PA. 2009. Exclusion techniques reveal significant biotic mortality suffered by Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) populations in Florida citrus. Biological Control 50: 129–136. Google Scholar
  41. Qureshi JA, Rogers ME, Hall DG, Stansly PA. 2009. Incidence of invasive Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) and its introduced parasitoid Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Florida citrus. Journal of Economic Entomology 102: 247–256. Google Scholar
  42. Qureshi JA, Kostyk BC, Stansly PA. 2014. Insecticidal suppression of Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) vector of huanglongbing pathogens. PLoS One 9: e112331. Google Scholar
  43. Raupp MJ, Koehler CS, Davidson JA. 1992. Advances in implementing integrated pest management for woody landscape plants. Annual Review of Entomology 37: 561–585. Google Scholar
  44. Rebek EJ, Sadof CS, Hanks LM. 2006. Influence of floral resource plants on control of an armored scale pest by the parasitoid Encarsia citrina (Craw.) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Biological Control 37: 320–328. Google Scholar
  45. Russell 2015. A meta-analysis of physiological and behavioral responses of parasitoid wasps to flowers of individual plant species. Biological Control 82: 96–103. Google Scholar
  46. Shrewsbury PM, Raupp MJ. 2000. Evaluation of components of vegetational texture for predicting azalea lace bug, Stephanitis pyrioides (Heteroptera: Tingidae), abundance in managed landscapes. Environmental Entomology 29: 919–926. Google Scholar
  47. Sivinski J, Wahl D, Holler T, Al Dobai S, Sivinski R. 2011. Conserving natural enemies with flowering plants: estimating floral attractiveness to parasitic Hymenoptera and attraction's relationship to flower and plant morphology. Biological Control 58: 208–214. Google Scholar
  48. Tena A, Hoddle CD, Hoddle MS. 2013. Competition between honeydew producers in an ant—hemipteran interaction may enhance biological control of an invasive pest. Bulletin of Entomological Research 103: 714–723. Google Scholar
  49. Tiwari S, Lewis-Rosenblum H, Pelz-Stelinski K, Stelinski LL. 2010. Incidence of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus infection in abandoned citrus occurring in proximity to commercially managed groves. Journal of Economic Entomology 103: 1972–1978. Google Scholar
  50. Tooker JF, Hanks LM. 2000. Influence of plant community structure on natural enemies of pine needle scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) in urban landscapes. Environmental Entomology 29: 1305–1311. Google Scholar
  51. Wäckers FL. 2004. Assessing the suitability of flowering herbs as parasitoid food sources: flower attractiveness and nectar accessibility. Biological Control 29: 307–314. Google Scholar
  52. Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ. 2012. Pick and mix: selecting flowering plants to meet the requirements of target biological control insects, pp. 140–165 In Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Snyder WE, Read DMY [eds.], Biodiversity and Insect Pests: Key Issues for Sustainable Management. Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, New Jersey Google Scholar
  53. Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ, Bruin J. 2005. Plant-Provided Food for Carnivore Insects: A Protective Mutualism and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar
  54. Wang Q, Li Y, Hanlon EA, Klassen W, Olczyk T, Ezenwa IV. 2015. Cover crop benefits for south Florida commercial vegetable producers. University of Florida Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension, Document SL-242. Google Scholar
  55. Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Google Scholar
  56. Zhu P, Gurr GM, Lu Z, Heong K, Chen G, Zheng X, Xu H, Yang Y. 2013. Laboratory screening supports the selection of sesame (Sesamum indicum) to enhance Anagrus spp. parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) of rice planthoppers. Biological Control 64: 83–89. Google Scholar
Joseph M. Patt and Eric Rohrig "Laboratory Evaluations of the Foraging Success of Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on Flowers and Extrafloral Nectaries: Potential use of Nectar Plants for Conservation Biological Control of Asian Citrus Psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae)," Florida Entomologist 100(1), (1 March 2017).

Back to Top