Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2017 Adult Identity Crisis in Leucothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Associated with the Tropical Ornamental Plant Codiaeum variegatum (Euphorbiaceae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Frequent US port of entry quarantine interceptions of unidentifiable larval Leucothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) species in association with Codiaeum variegatum (L.) Rumph. ex A. Juss. (Euphorbiaceae) ornamental plants from Costa Rica, initiated research to determine if these thrips were an invasive threat to US agriculture. Larval and adult Leucothrips were collected from the new growth leaves of C. variegatum and other plants in Florida and Costa Rica. There were no morphological differences among adult specimens from different hosts in Florida and Costa Rica; all identified as Leucothrips furcatus Hood by comparison with type specimens. However, morphological differences in larvae associated with these adult specimens were evident. DNA sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase c subunit 1 gene (COI), and 2 regions of the nuclear ribosomal cistron (rRNA; the complete internal transcribed spacer 2 [ITS2], and a section of the 28S large subunit rRNA) were used to verify that larvae and adults collected at the same site were the same species. Molecular data revealed species level divergence congruent with larval morphological differences.

Leucothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae: Dendrothripinae) represents an ill-defined genus of minute white thrips, most similar to the neotropical genus Halmathrips Hood and to the more cosmopolitan Pseudodendrothrips Schmutz (Mound 1999). Currently, Leucothrips consists of 5 species (Mound & Tree 2016). The females of Leucothrips pictus Hood, Leucothrips piercei Morgan and Leucothrips nigripennis Reuter can be morphologically distinguished by 3 unique character states: L. nigripennis has uniformly shaded brown forewings, L. pictus has 8 antennal segments, and L. piercei possesses simple sensory cones on antennal segments III and IV (Mound 1999). However, females of the remaining 2 species, Leucothrips furcatus Hood and Leucothrips theobromae Priesner are much more difficult to distinguish, both having 7 antennal segments, unshaded forewings, and forked sensory cones on antennal segments III and IV (Mound 1999). Indeed, morphologically they differ only by the absence or presence, respectively, of a crimson spot between the antennal bases (Hood 1931; Moulton 1933; Bailey 1957; Mound & Tree 2016).

Species differentiation based on male and larval specimens is even more problematic. The males of L. piercei and L. nigripennis have simple sensory cones on antennal segments III and IV, and males of L. theobromae have simple sensory cones on antennal segments III and IV (Mound 1999). Males of both L. pictus and L. furcatus have not been recorded (Mound 1999).

Published immature morphology of Leucothrips is limited to 3 species. Priesner (1923) described and illustrated the dorso-lateral abdominal setae of L. theobromae as gradually distally expanded and increasing in length from abdominal segment VII to IX. In contrast, the lateral abdominal setae on L. piercei terminate in minute knobs (Vance 1974) and L. nigripennis possesses slender capitate setae posterolaterally on segments VII to IX (Mound 1999).

Specific differences may exist in host plant use. The plant Theobroma cacao L. (Malvaceae) is a host for L. theobromae (Priesner 1923), Capsicum annuum L. (Solanaceae) for L. piercei (Zamar et al. 2014), and Pteris cretica L. (Pteridaceae) for L. nigripennis (Mound 1999). Leucothrips pictus seem to be associated with leaves of forest trees and L. nigripennis with ferns (Mound 1999). Adults of L. furcatus have been reported from; Erythrina sp. L. (Fabaceae; Hood 1931); Codiaeum variegatum var. pictum (L.) Rumph. ex A. Juss. (Euphorbiaceae) (Halbert 1996), Albizzia julibrissin Durazz. (Fabaceae) (Diffie & Srinivasan 2010), and Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet (Fabaceae) (Etienne et al. 2015). Undetermined species of Leucothrips were reported from the leaves of Cochlospermum vitifolium (Willd.) Spreng. (Bixaceae), and Ricinus species (Euphorbiaceae) (Mound & Marullo 1996). Also, records of undetermined species of Leucothrips intercepted from Sechium edule (Jacq.) Swartz (Cucurbitaceae) during US quarantine inspections were found using the United States Department of Agriculture, Plant Protection Quarantine, Agricultural Quarantine Activity System, PestID database queried from January 1, 1985 to January 1, 2016.

The final project proposal report of the Standards and Trade Development Facility (STDF 2009) presented to the World Trade Organization identified C. variegatum as 1 of 4 key ornamental live plant crops in Costa Rica that posed a phytosanitary risk for the USA based on frequent quarantine pest interceptions from 2007 to 2009. The regular interception of unidentifiable larval Leucothrips with C. variegatum was cited as a high priority problem by growers due to economic loss from fumigation costs at the US port of entry and reduced plant quality after fumigation. Proposed goals developed by the STDF (2009) were to minimize the phytosanitary risk and to maintain access to the USA market for C. variegatum. The strategy to achieve these goals included better management practices at the farm level and additional research to determine if Leucothrips were an invasive threat to USA agriculture. The objective of this study was to establish the identity of Leucothrips populations on C. variegatum in Costa Rica.

Materials and Methods

Larval and adult thrips were collected from new growth leaves of: C. variegatum cultivar ‘Petra’, Sechium edule, and T. cacao in Costa Rica; and, from C. variegatum cultivar ‘Petra’ in Florida, USA (Table 1). The thrips were captured individually with a small artist brush and transferred to 70% ethyl or isopropyl alcohol. In the laboratory the thrips were separated into 2 groups, thrips in group 1 were slide mounted and those in group 2 were transferred to >95% ethyl alcohol for molecular analysis. Slides were prepared with Canada balsam media using modified methods from Mound and Marullo (1996) or Hoyer's media. The slides were cured in an oven at approximately 40 °C. After curing, the cover slips of the Hoyer slides were sealed with clear nail polish. All specimens were examined with a compound microscope (DM LB2; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) under phase contrast at 100×, 200×, and 400× magnification, and were deposited at the Miami Plant Inspection Station (MPIS, Florida). Images were taken with Helicon Focus 6.1.0. software (HeliconSoft Ltd., Kharkiv, Ukraine), and adjusted for visual clarity with Photoshop® Elements 10 (Abobe Systems, San Jose, California).

Table 1.

Collection data for adult (♀ or ♂) and larval (LV) Leucothrips specimens sequenced and examined morphologically in this study. Large numbers of additional specimens were subject to morphological examination only (bold).

t01_509.gif

The slide-prepared specimens (Table 1) were morphologically compared with L. theobromae, 1♀ paratype, (US National Museum of Natural History [USNM], Beltsville Maryland) collected from T. cacao in Paramaraibo, Suriname; L. furcatus, 2♀♀ paratypes, (USNM), collected from Erythrina sp. in Guadeloupe (12 Mar 1915); L. furcatus, 1♀ (Florida State Collection of Arthropods [FSCA], Gainesville, Florida), collected from C. variegatum, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (1959); and L. theobromae, 3 ♀♀, (MPIS), collected from T. cacoa, Quevedo, Ecuador (31 Oct 2008).

Whole genomic DNA was extracted from representative specimens (Table 1), using the non-destructive EDNA HiSp-ExTM tissue kit (Fisher Biotec, Wembly, Australia) with the following modifications to the manufacturer protocol. Individual specimens were immersed in a 60 µL mix of the proprietary solutions 1A (48 µL) and 1B (12 µL) in a microcentrifuge tube and incubated at 95 °C for 30 min. Subsequent to incubation, 15 µL of proprietary solution 2 was added. The contents of the tube were mixed by gentle vortexing, and, taking care to avoid touching the specimen, 60 µL of the DNA template was transferred to a new microcentrifuge tube, and stored at -10 °C. Isopropyl alcohol (70%) was added to the original tube containing the specimen carcass. The extracted voucher specimens were prepared and curated as previously described.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was initially used to amplify part of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase c subunit 1 gene (COI) and the complete internal transcribed spacer 2 gene (ITS2) of the nuclear ribosomal cistron (rRNA). A section of COI was amplified using the mtD-7.2F and mtD-9.2R primers of Brunner et al. (2002). PCR was performed in 25 µL reactions containing 2 µL DNA template, 1× Thermopol Buffer (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts), 2.5 µL dNTP/dUTP mix (Thermo Scientific [#R0251], Waltham, Massachusetts), 1 mM of MgCl2, 10 µg BSA (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts), 0.4 µM of each primer, and 1.5 U Taq polymerase (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts). Following initial denaturing at 94 °C for 3 min, amplification was performed on a Mastercycler® ep gradient S thermocycler (Eppendorf North America Inc., New York, New York) employing 38 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 47 °C for 1 min, and 68 °C for 1 min 30 s. Reactions then were held at 68 °C for a further 3 min to ensure complete extension of all amplicons. ITS2 was amplified using the ITS2-forward and CS250 primers and protocol described in Rugman-Jones et al. (2006) with a single modification incorporating 0.4 µM dUTP instead of 0.2 µM dTTP in case of carryover contamination (Hartley & Rashtchian 1993). Based on our comparison of COI and ITS2 sequences, we subsequently used the primers 28sF3633 and 28b to amplify a section of the conserved 28S large subunit rRNA, following Rugman-Jones et al. (2010a), with the same dUTP modification detailed above. The success of the PCR was confirmed by standard gel electrophoresis, and amplicons were purified using Wizard PCR Preps (Promega, Madison, WI) or ExoSAPIT (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), prior to direct sequencing in both directions at the Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, California.

Sequences were compiled and trimmed (to remove primers) using Sequencher® 4.9 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan). Flanking 5.8S and 28S regions of the ITS2 were identified using the annotate tool in ITS2 database (Keller et al. 2009, Ankenbrand et al. 2015), and removed. Sequence sets were aligned in MAFFT version 7.293 (Katoh & Standley 2013) using the G-INS-1 strategy and all sequences were deposited in GenBank (Benson et al. 2008); accession numbers KY679041–KY679088. COI sequences were translated using the EMBOSS-Transeq website (Rice et al. 2000; Goujon et al. 2010) to confirm the absence of nuclear pseudogenes (Song et al. 2008), and then collapsed into haplotypes using DnaSP v5.10.01 (Librado & Rozas 2009). The number and nature of polymorphic sites in the COI dataset was characterized using DnaSP, and pairwise divergence between the different haplotypes was estimated by calculating Kimura 2-parameter distances (K2P) using MEGA version 6 (Tamura et al. 2013). K2P was used to construct an unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) tree and branch support was estimated using a bootstrap procedure with 1000 replicates. Sequences of the 2 rRNA genes (ITS2 and 28S) were not subject to formal analysis, but instead, the aligned dataset of each was examined by eye, for evidence of differentiation.

Results

No morphological differences were detected between the collected Leucothrips adults and the paratypes of L. furcatus. The collected adults, before maceration, did not have a hypodermal crimson spot between the antennal bases as observed in the paratype of L. theobromae. However, 2 distinct 2nd instar morphotypes were observed in larval specimens. The 2nd instar morphotype-A, collected from S. edule in Costa Rica had between 7 to 15 circular pores within each spiracular area of abdominal tergite II (Fig. 1) and the pronotal setae pair VI were ~19 to 24 µm in length (Fig. 2). The 2nd instar morphotype-B that were collected from C. variegatum and T. cacao possessed 3 to 5 pores within each spiracular area of abdominal tergite II (Fig. 3) and the pronotal setae pair VI were ~10 to 14 µm in le ngth (Fig. 4).

Aligned sequences of a 434 base pair (bp) section of COI from 16 Leucothrips specimens (GenBank accessions KY679057–KY679072) harbored 74 polymorphic sites and collapsed into 7 haplotypes. The Costa Rican specimens from S. edule harbored a single haplotype, which in the UPGMA analysis formed a clade (Clade A), with 100% support, that differed by approximately 18% from a second fully supported clade containing all remaining haplotypes (Clade B; K2P ranged from 0.180–0.186; Fig. 5). Within Clade B, maximum divergence among the 6 haplotypes was 1.6% (K2P = 0.016; Fig. 5). The majority of nucleotide substitutions were synonymous, but changes at 4 positions (47–48, 254, and 368) resulted in 3 changes to the encoded amino acid chain, 2 of which (47–48, and 254) were diagnostic of the Costa Rican specimens from S. edule.

Figs. 1–4.

Second instar larva of Leucothrips species: (1) morphotype-A abdominal tergite II spiracle at 1000× magnification; (2) morphotype-A prothorax; arrow indicates setae D6; (3) morphotype-B abdominal tergite II spiracle at 1000× magnification; (4) morphotype-B prothorax; arrow indicates setae D6; scale = 50 µm.

f01_509.jpg

The same division was evident in the sequences of both regions of rRNA. There were multiple, consistent differences in a 505 bp aligned matrix of ITS2 sequences (GenBank accessions KY679073–KY679088), between Costa Rican specimens from S. edule and those from the other hosts or localities (Fig. 6). Similarly, across a 786 bp section of the highly conserved 28S, there were consistent substitutions at 4 nucleotide positions; 109, 180, 287, and 558 (GenBank accessions KY679041–KY679056).

Discussion

Based on adult morphology, specimens of Leucothrips from populations in Costa Rica and Florida could not be differentiated. However, differences in larval morphology, and the DNA sequences of 3 separate genes (COI, ITS2, and 28S), divided these Leucothrips specimens into 2 concordant groups. One group (Clade B; Fig. 5) consisted of specimens collected from C. variegatum in both Florida and Costa Rica, and also Costa Rican specimens from T. cacao and Ricinus sp. Low genetic divergence (COI <1.6%) and high morphological affinity (adult and 2nd instar larva) among the specimens in this group provide strong evidence that they constitute a single species. In contrast, despite the absence of adult morphological differences, the second group (Clade A; Fig. 5), consisting only of specimens collected from S. edule in Costa Rica, was clearly genetically divergent (COI ~18%). The 2nd instar larva of Clade A also were morphologically different from those of Clade B, further indicating that the former likely represents another, cryptic species.

Fig. 5.

An unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) tree of Kimura 2-parameter distances (K2P) among the cytochrome oxidase c subunit 1 gene (COI) sequences of Leucothrips collections that are indistinguishable based on adult morphology. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 0.19814793 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale. Analyses were conducted in MEGA version 6.

f05_509.jpg

This is not the first time that such cryptic diversity has been uncovered in Thysanoptera, with the aid of DNA sequence data. For example, previous molecular studies of important thrip (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) pest species such as Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande (Rugman-Jones et al. 2010b), Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Dickey et al. 2015), and Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Brunner et al. 2004; Jacobson et al. 2016), have all revealed evidence of cryptic species within those taxa. In each of these species, reexamination of adult morphology in light of DNA evidence, has failed to reveal any differential characters (Rugman-Jones et al. 2010b; Dickey et al. 2015; Brunner et al. 2004). However, an earlier morphological and biological study of T. tabaci, conducted before the invention of DNA barcoding, noted a difference in larval morphology between, what were therein proposed to be biotypes; the “tabaci type” and the “communis type” (Zawirska 1976). The types differed not only in larval morphology (absence of abdominal tergite IX posteromarginal teeth in tabaci vs. presence in communis), but also in reproductive strategy (arrhenotoky in tabaci vs. thelytoky in communis), and behavior (specialized feeding in tabaci vs. polyphagy in communis). These differences were later corroborated by the finding of deep genetic divergence between the types (Brunner et al. 2004). Similarly, we also found a morphological difference between the larvae of our 2 Leucothrips genetic types. Furthermore, and again similar to T. tabaci, we also found potential differences in both reproductive strategy and feeding behavior between the Leucothrips types, although this is based on a relatively limited sample. There was a complete absence of males in the genetic type that was collected only from S. edule, suggesting that this species may be thelytokous and monophagous. Conversely we were able to find males in the genetic type collected from C. variegatum and Ricinus sp.

From our limited dataset, it appears that only 1 of the 2 types is established in Florida, however the specific identity of the 2 Leucothrips types remains ambiguous. Female adult morphology of both types matches that of L. furcatus. Interestingly, there is a complete absence of males in the type series of L. furcatus (Hood 1931), and, therefore, it may be inferred that the specimens from S. edule, that contained no males, are in fact the true L. furcatus. Indeed a much broader sampling of plant hosts and locations, accompanied by morphological and molecular study, is warranted before any taxonomic decisions are made.

Fig. 6.

Divergence in the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) DNA sequence of Leucothrips specimens from Sechium edule in Costa Rica relative to those from other hosts. Sequences were aligned with MAFFT v7.293 using the G-INS-1 strategy.

f06_509.jpg

Acknowledgments

We thank Debra Creel and Gary Miller, USDA, ARS, SEL, Beltsville, Maryland, for arranging the loan of the type specimens. Also to Laurence Mound, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia for critical review of a previous manuscript.

References Cited

1.

Ankenbrand MJ, Keller A, Wolf M, Schultz J, Förster F. 2015. ITS2 database V: Twice as much. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 3030–3032. Google Scholar

2.

Bailey SF. 1957. The thrips of California, part 1: suborder Terebrantia. Bulletin of the California Insect Survey 4: 143–220. Google Scholar

3.

Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Wheeler DL. 2008. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research 36: 25–30. Google Scholar

4.

Brunner PC, Fleming C, Frey JE. 2002 A molecular identification key for economically important thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) using direct sequencing and a PCR-RFLP-based approach. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 4: 127–136. Google Scholar

5.

Brunner PC, Chatzivassiliou EK, Katis NI, Frey JE. 2004. Host-associated genetic differentiation in Thrips tabaci (Insecta; Thysanoptera), as determined from mtDNA sequence data. Heredity 93: 364–370. Google Scholar

6.

Dickey AM, Kumar V, Hoddle MS, Funderburk JE, Morgan K, Jara-Cavieres A, Shatters Jr RG, Osborne LS, McKenzie CL. 2015. The Scirtothrips dorsalis species complex: endemism and invasion in a global pest. PLoS ONE 10: e0123747. Google Scholar

7.

Diffie S, Srinivasan R. 2010. Occurrence of Leucothrips furcatus, Scirtothrips dorsalis, and Tenothrips frici (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) previously unreported from Georgia. Journal of Entomological Science 45: 394–396. Google Scholar

8.

Etienne J, Ryckewaert P, Michel B. 2015. Thrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera) of Guadeloupe and Martinique: updated check-list with new information on their ecology and natural enemies. Florida Entomologist 98: 298–304. Google Scholar

9.

Goujon M, McWilliam H, Li W, Valentin F, Squizzato S, Paern J, Lopez R. 2010. A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Research 38 Suppl: W695–W699. Google Scholar

10.

Halbert SE. 1996. Entomology Section. Coile NC, Dixon WN [eds.]. TRI-OLOGY 35: 5. Google Scholar

11.

Hartley JL, Rashtchian A. 1993. Dealing with contamination: enzymatic control of carryover contamination in PCR. Genome Research 3: 10–14. Google Scholar

12.

Hood JD. 1931. Notes on New York Thysanoptera, with descriptions of new species III. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomology Society 26: 151–170. Google Scholar

13.

Jacobson AL, Nault BA, Vargo EL, Kennedy G. 2016. Restricted gene flow among lineages of Thrips tabaci supports genetic divergence among cryptic species groups. PLoS One 11: e0163882. Google Scholar

14.

Kazutaka K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT Multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. Google Scholar

15.

Keller A, Schleicher T, Schultz J, Müller T, Dandekar T, Wolf M. 2009. 5.8S-28S rRNA interaction and HMM-based ITS2 annotation. Gene 430: 50–57. Google Scholar

16.

Librado P, Rozas J. 2009. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451–1452. Google Scholar

17.

Moulton D. 1933. The Thysanoptera of South America (I). Revista Entomologia, Rio de Janeiro 3: 107–122. Google Scholar

18.

Mound LA. 1999. Saltatorial leaf-feeding Thysanoptera (Thripidae, Dendrothripinae) in Australia and New Caledonia, with newly recorded pests of ferns, figs and mulberries. Australian Journal of Entomology 38: 257–273. Google Scholar

19.

Mound LA, Marullo R. 1996. The thrips of Central and South America: an introduction. Memoirs on Entomology International 6: 1–488. Google Scholar

20.

Mound LA, Tree DJ. 2016. Genera of the leaf-feeding Dendrothripinae of the world (Thysanoptera, Thripidae), with new species from Australia and Sulawesi, Indonesia. Zootaxa 4109: 569–582. Google Scholar

21.

Priesner H. 1923. Ein beitrag zur kenntnis der Thysanopteren Surinams. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 66: 88–111. Google Scholar

22.

Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. 2000. EMBOSS: The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends in Genetics 16: 276–277. Google Scholar

23.

Rugman-Jones PF, Hoddle MS, Mound LA, Stouthamer R. 2006. Molecular identification key for pest species of Scirtothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 99: 1813–1819. Google Scholar

24.

Rugman-Jones PF, Andersen JC, Morse JG, Normark BB, Stouthamer R. 2010a. Molecular phylogenetic placement of the recently described armored scale insect Abgrallaspis aguacatae and several congeners (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 103: 30–38. Google Scholar

25.

Rugman-Jones PF, Hoddle MS, Stouthamer R. 2010b. Nuclear-mitochondrial barcoding exposes the global pest western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) as two sympatric cryptic species in its native California. Journal of Economic Entomology 103: 877–886. Google Scholar

26.

Song H, Buhay JE, Whiting MF, Crandall KA. 2008. Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 13486–13491. Google Scholar

27.

STDF (Standards and Trade Development Facility). 2009. Accessing new ornamental plant markets by reducing phytosanitary issues through participatory research and extension: the Clean Stock Program. Project Preparation Grant STDF 286,  http://www.standardsfacility.org/PPG-286 (last accessed 31 Mar 2017). Google Scholar

28.

Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. Google Scholar

29.

Vance TC. 1974. Larvae of the Sericothripini (Thysanoptera:Thripidae), with reference to other larvae of the Terebrantia of Illinois. Bulletin of the Illinois Natural History Survey 31: 144–208. Google Scholar

30.

Zamar MI, de Borbón CM, Aguirre A, Miño V, Cáceres S. 2014. Primer registro del daño de Leucothrips piercei (Morgan) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) en cultivos de pimiento (Capsicum annuum L.) (Solanaceae) en la Argentina. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo 46: 213–219. Google Scholar

31.

Zawirska I. 1976. Untersuchungen über zwei biologische typen von Thrips tabaci Lind. (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in der VR Polen. Archiv für Phytopathologie und Pflanzenschutz 12: 411–422. Google Scholar
Thomas L. Skarlinsky, Paul Rugman-Jones, Joe Funderburk, Richard Stouthamer, and Carlos Sanabria Ujueta "Adult Identity Crisis in Leucothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Associated with the Tropical Ornamental Plant Codiaeum variegatum (Euphorbiaceae)," Florida Entomologist 100(3), 509-514, (1 September 2017). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0303
Published: 1 September 2017
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top