Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2017 New Report of Brevipalpus yothersi (Prostigmata: Tenuipalpidae) on Blueberry in Florida
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Brevipalpus yothersi (Baker, 1949) (Prostigmata: Tenuipalpidae) is newly reported on southern highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum L. X V. darrowi Camp (Ericaceae), in Florida, USA. The specimens were collected from a commercial southern highbush blueberry planting of Abundance, Emerald, and Meadowlark blueberry varieties from Sep to Nov 2016. The species is described based on morphological (light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy) methods. Information on its economic importance, host plants, and geographical distribution also is provided.

The family Tenuipalpidae is known as false spider mites or flat mites. It contains over 1,100 valid species belonging to 38 genera (Vacante 2015). Members of the genus Brevipalpus Donnadieu, 1875, one of the dominant genera in the family, are considered as the most economically important group of species among the flat mites (Childers et al. 2003; Salinas-Vargas et al. 2016). These mites cause direct damage by inserting their mouthparts into plant tissues and sucking sap. They also inject their toxic saliva into the plant during feeding (Childers & Rodrigues 2011). Furthermore, several of these mites transmit viruses to host plants (Mesa et al. 2009; Salinas-Vargas et al. 2016).

Brevipalpus yothersi (Baker, 1949) (Prostigmata: Tenuipalpidae) is one of the more important flat mites, causing economic damage to many crop plants (Novelli et al. 2016). It was recently suggested to be the vector for cytoplasmic leprosis viruses (citrus leprosis virus C, citrus leprosis virus C2, and Hibiscus green spot virus 2) (Roy et al. 2015).

Brevipalpus yothersi was synonymized with B. phoenicis by Pritchard & Baker (1952) but Beard et al. (2015a) raised it again to species level and gave an extensive account of its distribution and host plants. But, so far, there have been no records of B. yothersi on blueberries grown in Florida. This paper reports blueberry as a new host of B. yothersi from Florida. Additionally, measurements (range in μm) of the Florida specimens, information regarding collection details, habitats, hosts, damage, and world distribution are also presented in this paper.

Material and Method

COLLECTION OF SAMPLES

Mites were collected from 3 different southern highbush blueberry varieties, Abundance, Emerald, and Meadowlark, from Sep to Nov 2016. Approximately 30 to 50 leaves per blueberry bush were collected every 2 weeks and samples were taken randomly from an organic commercial farm in Eustis, Florida, USA (28.8692°N, 81.63023°W; 38 masl). Samples were placed separately (according to variety) into 3.7 L zipper storage bags, labeled, and brought to the laboratory. There, the mites were collected from the leaves under a stereomicroscope. Specimens were preserved in vials containing 70% ethanol.

LIGHT MICROSCOPY

Mite specimens were cleared in Lacto-phenol, mounted in Hoyer's solution on microscope slides, and dried in an oven at 50 °C. Light microscopy photographs were taken with a JVC KY-F70B digital camera, and automontage pro software (version 5.02, Syncroscopy, Frederick, Maryland, USA) mounted on a Leica DMLB compound microscope. For identification, the following keys were used: Baker et al. (1975); Ghai & Shenhmar (1984); Baker & Tuttle (1987); Welbourn et al. (2003); Mesa et al. (2009); Beard et al. (2015a); and Çobanoğlu et al. (2016). All specimens were deposited in the mite collection of Ordu University, Agricultural Faculty, Plant Protection Department, Ordu, Turkey.

Photos of living mites were taken with a digital camera mounted on a stereoscopic microscope LEICA M205 C (Leica Microsystems Inc., Buffalo Grove, Illinois, USA) connected to a computer.

SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (SEM)

To prepare specimens for electron microscopy, the method of Çobanoğlu et al. (2011) was used. Briefly, the samples were fixed in 70% alcohol. After fixation, the samples were dehydrated in an alcohol series (70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, and 100%) for 30 m each. Dehydrated specimens were critical-point-dried, and mounted on SEM stubs. Mounted samples were coated with gold/palladium (20 nm). The specimens were examined with a scanning electron microscope (FEI Nova 430 w/EDS & CL, Nanoscale Research Facility, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA).

Fig. 1.

Brevipalpus yothersi on blueberry (abundance) leaf - adult (a), egg (b), larva (c), protonymph (d).

f01_731.jpg

Results

Family Tenuipalpidae Berlese
Type genus—Tenuipalpus Donnadieu, 1875
Genus Brevipalpus Donnadieu 1875

  • Type species: Brevipalpus obovatus Donnadieu 1875

  • Brevipalpus yothersi Baker 1949

  • New synonymies (Beard et al. 2015a):

    Brevipalpus mcbridei Baker 1949

    Brevipalpus deleoni Pritchard and Baker 1958

    Brevipalpus phoenicoides Gonzalez 1975

    Brevipalpus amicus Chaudhri 1972

    Brevipalpus recula Chaudhri 1972

  • Fig. 2.

    Brevipalpus yothersi female - dorsal propodosoma (a), opisthosoma (b).

    f02_731.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Brevipalpus yothersi female - dorsal view (a), ventral view (b).

    f03_731.jpg

    Fig. 4.

    Brevipalpus yothersi female - ventral view of propodosoma (a), the region between coxal fields of legs III and IV, and the bases of setae 3a and 4a, and the area between setae 3a and 4a, and the area posterior to the 4a setae (b).

    f04_731.jpg

    Fig. 5.

    Brevipalpus yothersi female - ventral view of anal and genital regions (a), spermatheca (b), dorsal seta on palp femorogenu (c), distal part of palpus (d).

    f05_731.jpg

    MATERIAL EXAMINED

    One larva, 23.IX.2016; 1 deutonymph, 2 ♀, 10.X.2016 on Meadowlark blueberry variety. 1 larva, 1 deutonymph, 23.IX.2016; 1 ♀, 10.X.2016 on Emerald blueberry variety. 2 larvae, 3 protonymphs, 3 deutonymph, 4 ♀, 1 ♂, 23.IX.2016 on Abundance blueberry variety.

    STEREOMICROSCOPE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT STAGES OF BREVIPALPUS YOTHERSI

    Adult females are red-orange in color. They are flat, and oval in shape (Fig. 1a). Eggs are elliptical and bright reddish-orange color (Fig. 1b). Larvae are orange-red and have 3 pairs of legs (Fig. 1c) The protonymph stage (Fig. 1d) is similar in appearance and color pattern to the deutonymph stage, but smaller.

    LIGHT MICROSCOPY AND SEM ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT STAGES OF BREVIPALPUS YOTHERSI

    FEMALE (n = 5) (Figs . 26)

    Dorsum: Central portions of prodorsum with strong areolae, usually longitudinally elongate, while the posterior cuticle of the sublateral prodorsum is reticulate with large cells and anterior to setae v2 with weak reticulation, becoming broadly wrinkled to smooth posterior to v2 (Fig. 2a). Opisthosoma with 6 pairs of lateral setae with setae f2 absent (Fig. 2b, 3a). Ornamentation between setae c1-c1 to d1-d1 smooth to weakly reticulate. Area between the setae d1-d1 and e1-e1 with weak reticulations and wrinkles. The strong V-shaped folds from setae e1-e1 to h1-h1 is one of the characteristics of B. yothersi, but much weaker towards h1 (Fig. 2b). Measurements of setae as follows: length between setae v2-h1 217 to 222; width between setae sc2-sc2 138 to 144, c3-c3 149 to 179. Dorsal setae lanceolate, barbed: v2 9 to 12, sc1 8 to 11, sc2 10 to 11, c1 6 to 8, c3 6 to 9, d1 6 to 7, d3 8 to 9, e1 7 to 9, e3 8 to 10, f3 9 to 11, h1 9 to 11, h2 8 to 10.

    Fig. 6.

    Distal part of tarsus II of Brevipalpus yothersi female.

    f06_731.jpg

    Ventral: Base of coxal fields of legs I and II are finely verrucose (Fig. 4a). The region between coxal fields of legs III and IV and the bases of setae 3a and 4a is verrucose. Area posterior to the 4a setae is uniformly verrucose but between setae 3a and 4a is smooth to finely verrucose (Fig. 3b, 4b).

    The ventral plates are uniformly verrucose, whereas the genital plate is verrucose-reticulate with large cells (Fig. 5a).

    Spermathecal apparatus (Fig. 5b): The spermathecal duct is long, narrow and ending in vesicle. The spermathecal vesicle is oval-shaped with a thick distal stipe.

    Palpus: Dorsal seta on palp femorogenu is barbed, narrow, setiform (Fig. 5c) and palp tibia with 2 setae and 1 omega (Fig. 5d).

    Legs: B. yothersi has 2 solenidia (ω) on tarsus II (Fig. 6). Length of legs (base of coxae to tip of claws) as follows: leg I 149 to 179; leg II 156 to 173; leg III 140 to 150; leg IV 150 to 160.

    MALE (n = 1) (Fig . 7a)

    The adult males are more wedge-shaped than females. They have same ventral pattern as female.

    DEUTONYMPH (n = 4)

    Dorsum: Length between setae v2-h1 171 to 222; width between setae sc2-sc2 110 to 129, c3-c3 117 to 145. Dorsal setae: v2 5 to 6, sc1 5 to 12, sc2 9 to 14, c1 4 to 5, c3 4 to 8, d1 3 to 4, d3 4 to 6, e1 3 to 4, e3 3 to 6, f3 13 to 17, h1 10 to 16, h2 10 to 16.

    Legs: Length of legs (base of coxae to tip of claws) as follows: leg I 104 to 127; leg II 96 to 108; leg III 85 to 88; leg IV 82 to 94.

    PROTONYMPH (n = 2)

    Dorsum: Length between setae v2-h1 146 to 173; width between setae sc2-sc2 104 to 110, c3-c3 107 to 122. Dorsal setae: v2 4, sc1 6 to 7, sc2 9 to 11, c1 3, c3 3 to 7, d1 2, d3 3, e1 3, e3 3, f3 11 to 13, h1 11 to 12, h2 10 to 12.

    Fig. 7.

    Ventral view of Brevipalpus yothersi male (a) and Brevipalpus yothersi larva (b).

    f07_731.jpg

    Legs: Length of legs (base of coxae to tip of claws) as follows: leg I 83 to 85; leg II 71 to 72; leg III 62 to 64; leg IV 60 to 62.

    LARVAE (n = 2) (Fig . 7b)

    Dorsum: Body measurements: length between setae v2-h1 131 to 170; width between setae sc2-sc2 85 to 107, c3-c3 99 to 111. Dorsal setae: v2 3 to 4, sc1 5, sc2 9 to 10, c1 3, c3 3 to 4, d1 2, d3 4, e1 3, e3 4 to 5, f3 10 to 13, h1 9 to 12, h2 12 to 65.

    Legs: Length of legs (base of coxae to tip of claws) as follows: leg I 83 to 85; leg II 71 to 72; leg III 62 to 64; leg IV 60 to 62.

    HOST PLANTS AND DISTRIBUTION

    Brevipalpus yothersi seems to have a cosmopolitan distribution and a very broad host range, with a strong association with Citrus spp. (Rutaceae) (Beard et al. 2015b). Because B. yothersi was considered to be B. phoenicis (Geijskes) since 1952, when it was synonymized with the latter (Pritchard & Baker 1952), its hosts and geographic distribution are given here based on material examined by Beard et al. (2015a) in Table 1.

    Table 1.

    Geographical distribution and host records of Brevipalpus yothersi (based on examined material by Beard et al. (2015a).

    t01_731.gif

    DAMAGE

    Brevipalpus spp. are economically important plant-feeding mite species. These species damage plants directly by feeding on the epidermal cells of the stems, leaves, and fruits (Peña et al. 2015; Salinas-Vargas et al. 2016). They feed by inserting their chelicerae into the host plant tissue. During feeding, toxic saliva is injected into the cells. The sap is then mixed with saliva and sucked up by the mite. Brevipalpus spp. usually feed on twigs, leaves, and fruit (Childers et al. 2011). The symptoms associated with injury caused by these mites vary from necrotic brown spots on leaves, resinous leaf patches with opposing leaf, stem browning, gall formation, brownish patches on the fruit surface, corky ring-like bands around the fruit to defoliation and die back depending on the host plant species (Childers et al. 2003).

    Brevipalpus mites also can act as vectors of viruses. Their role as vectors of citrus leprosis virus (CiLV) has greatly increased their worldwide importance as quarantine pests (Peña et al. 2015).

    Fig. 8.

    Blueberry leaves infested with Brevipalpus yothersi and the bacterial plant disease Xylella sp. (Bacteria: Xanthomonadales).

    f08_731.jpg

    In this study, necrotic brown spots were observed together with the symptoms of Xylella sp. (Bacteria: Xanthomonadales) on blueberry leaves infested with B. yothersi (Fig. 8).

    Recently, it has been shown that B. yothersi has a strong association with the citrus leprosis virus complex and it has been suggested to be a vector of the cytoplasmic leprosis viruses (Roy et al. 2015). These viruses induce localized necrotic or chlorotic lesions around the mitefeeding sites (Ramos-Gonzalez et al. 2016).

    Remarks

    Brevipalpus yothersi was originally described as a separate species in 1949 (Baker, 1949). It was later considered as a synonym of B. phoenicis together with B. papayensis in 1952 (Pritchard & Baker, 1952). However, B. yothersi differs from B. phoenicis in having a narrowly lanceolate dorsal seta on palp femorogenu (Fig. 5c) instead of broad as in B. phoenicis. The spermatheca vesicle is round without stipe or not developed in B. phoenicis, whereas the spermatheca vesicle is oval with a strong distal stipe in B. yothersi. Furthermore, the cuticle on the dorsal opisthosoma between setae e1-e1 to h1-h1 is without strong chevrons, usually with more or less transverse folds in B. phoenicis, whereas the cuticle on the dorsal opisthosoma between setae e1-e1 to h1-h1 is usually with strong chevrons (V-shaped folds), becoming much weaker towards h1-h1 (Beard et al. 2015a ). Brevipalpus yothersi differs from B. papayensis as shown in Table 2.

    Brevipalpus yothersi is listed as B. phoenicis group species B (Beard et al. 2015b). However, it was raised to species level again. It was also confirmed that Brevipalpus amicus Chaudhri, B. recula Chaudhri, B. mcbridei Baker, and B. deleoni Pritchard and Baker are junior synonyms of B. yothersi (Beard et al. 2015a).

    Discussion

    The family Tenuipalpidae Berlese includes more than 1,100 species in 36 genera (Beard et al. 2015; Çobanoğlu et al. 2016). Brevipalpus Donnadieu, 1875 is the largest genus in the Tenuipalpidae (Welbourn et al. 2003) and includes more than 300 species worldwide.

    Within the genus Brevipalpus, B. yothersi was not detected during previous surveys carried out in Florida, USA, on blueberry. In this study, during surveys carried out in 2016 in Florida, it was reported on southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L. × V. darrowi Camp (Ericaceae)). Brevipalpus yothersi was initially described from specimens collected on privet (Ligustrum sp.: Oleaceae) in Orlando, Florida, USA (Baker 1949). It was subsequently synonymized with B. phoenicis by Pritchard & Baker (1952). The mite was recently resurrected and redescribed (Beard et al. 2015a; Novelli et al. 2016). According to Beard et al. (2015a), it was collected from Citrus sp. (Orlando), Juglans regia (Juglandaceae) (Orlando), Cocos nucifera (Arecaceae) (Fort Lauderdale), Maranta sp. (Marantaceae) (Bradenton), Petrea sp. (Verbenaceae) (Miami), Archontophoenix alexandrae (Arecaceae) (Gainesville), Citrus sp. (with leprosis) (Rutaceae) (Lake Alfred) in Florida.

    Table 2.

    Morphological characteristics used to separate Brevipalus yothersi and Brevipalpus papayensis (Sanchez-Velazquez et al. 2015).

    t02_731.gif

    Within the group of Brevipalpus species that transmit plant viruses, B. yothersi is the principal vector of viruses causing the cytoplasmic type of leprosis (Rodrigues & Childers 2013; Roy et al. 2015; Arena et al. 2016; Ramos-Gonzalez et al. 2016). Previously, it was thought that all leprosis viruses could be transmitted only by B. phoenicis, but recently, the species status of B. phoenicis has been revised, and 4 species previously considered as synonyms of B. phoenicis have been confirmed as separate species.

    Blueberry necrotic ring blotch virus (BNRBV) was reported from Florida by Quito-Avila et al. (2013). It is closely related to the viral plant diseases citrus leprosis virus and Hibiscus green spot virus (HGSV), which are transmitted by Brevipalpus species (Robinson 2013). In the future, it also will be necessary to elucidate the potential role of B. yothersi as a vector of blueberry necrotic ring blotch virus.

    Like viruses, other plant pathogens including bacteria also are transmitted or spread by mites from different families such as Tenuipalpidae, Acaridae, Eriophyidae, Siteroptidae, Tarsonemidae and Tetranychidae (Sarwar 2015). Unlike viruses, most bacterial diseases of plants do not require vectors. However, vectors contribute to the spread of some bacterial pathogens of plants (Purcell 2009). We observed that leaves heavily infested with B. yothersi also were infected with the bacterial plant disease Xylella sp. (Fig. 8). Thus, further study may be necessary to determine the role of B. yothersi in the development and spread of Xylella in Vaccinium spp.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank Dr. Phillip Harmon and the Universityof Florida/IFAS Plant Disease Diagnostic Center for the identification of Xylella sp. We also thank the Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research (ICBR) at the University of Florida for providing technical assistance with the use of the electron microscope. Finally, we thank an organic grower in central Florida for allowing collection of samples from his farm. The research was supported by private funding from a Florida blueberry grower group.

    References Cited

    1.

    Arena GD, Ramos-Gonzalez PL, Nunes MA, Ribeiro-Alves M, Camargo LEA, Kitajima EW, Machado MA, Freitas-Astua J. 2016. Citrus leprosis virus c infection results in hypersensitive-like response, suppression of the ja/et plant defense pathway and promotion of the colonization of its mite vector. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 17. Google Scholar

    2.

    Baker EW 1949. The genus Brevipalpus (Acarina: Pseudoleptidae). The American Midland Naturalist 42: 350–402. Google Scholar

    3.

    Baker EW, Tuttle DM, Abbatiello MJ. 1975. The false spider mites of Northwestern and North Central Mexico (Acarina: Tenuipalpidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 194: 1–23. Google Scholar

    4.

    Baker EW, Tuttle DM. 1987. The false spider mites of Mexico (Tenuipalpidae: Acari). United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Technical Bulletin 1706, 1–236. Google Scholar

    5.

    Beard JJ, Ochoa R, Braswell WE, Bauchan GR. 2015a. Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes) species complex (Acari: Tenuipalpidae)-a closer look. Zootaxa 3944: 1–67. Google Scholar

    6.

    Beard JJ, Ochoa R, Bauchan GR, Trice M, Redford A, Walters T, Mitter C. 2015b. Flat mites of the World,  http://idtools.org/id/mites/flatmite (last accessed 3 Dec 2016). Google Scholar

    7.

    Childers CC, French JV, Rodrigues JCV. 2003. Brevipalpus californicus, B. obovatus, B. phoenicis and B. lewisi (Acari: Tenuipalpidae): a review of their biology, feeding injury and economic importance. Experimental and Applied Acarology 30: 5–28. Google Scholar

    8.

    Childers CC, Rodrigues JCV. 2011. An overview of Brevipalpus mites (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) and the plant viruses they transmit. Zoosymposia 6: 180–192. Google Scholar

    9.

    Çobanoğlu S, Tiedt L, Sağlam HD, Ueckermann EA. 2011. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) study of selected Tenuipalpidae (Acari: Prostigmata; Pentamerismus, Aegyptobia) from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Entomology 35: 19–29. Google Scholar

    10.

    Çobanoğlu S, Ueckermann EA, Sağlam FD. 2016. The Tenuipalpidae of Turkey, with a key to species (Acari: Trombidiformes). Zootaxa 4097: 151–186. Google Scholar

    11.

    Ghai S, Shenhmar M. 1984. A review of the World fauna of Tenuipalpidae (Acarina: Tetranychoidea). Oriental Insects 18: 99–172. Google Scholar

    12.

    Mesa NC, Ochoa R, Welbourn WC, Evans GA, De Moraes GJ. 2009. A catalog of the Tenuipalpidae (Acari) of the World with a key to genera. Zootaxa 2098: 1–185. Google Scholar

    13.

    Novelli VM, Nunes MA, de Mendonça RS, Astu JF, Sinico TE, Lin YC, Le P, De Peer YV, Navia D. 2016. Genome annotation of the flat mite Brevipalpus yothersi Baker (Tenuipalpidae), pp. 51 In Proceedings, the 8th Symposium of EURAAC. Valencia, Spain, 11–15 Jul 2016. Google Scholar

    14.

    Peña JE, Santos K, Baez I, Carrillo D. 2015. Physical post-harvest techniques as potential quarantine treatments against Brevipalpus yothersi (Acarina: Tenuipalpidae). Florida Entomologist 98: 1169–1174. Google Scholar

    15.

    Pritchard AE, Baker EW. 1952. The false spider mites of California (Acarina: Phytoptipalpidae). University of California Publications in Entomology 9: 1–94. Google Scholar

    16.

    Purcell AH [Ed.]. 2009. Plant Diseases and Insects. Elsevier, Academic Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Google Scholar

    17.

    Quito-Avila DF, Brannen PM, Cline WO, Harmon PF, Martin RR. 2013. Genetic characterization of blueberry necrotic ring blotch virus, a novel RNA virus with unique genetic features. Journal of General Virology 94: 1426–1434. Google Scholar

    18.

    Ramos-Gonzalez PL, Chabi-Jesus C, Guerra-Peraza O, Breton MC, Arena GD, Nunes MA, Kitajima EW, Machado MA, Freitas-Astua J. 2016. Phylogenetic and molecular variability studies reveal a new genetic clade of Citrus leprosis virus C. Viruses 8: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/v8060153 Google Scholar

    19.

    Robinson TS. 2013. Epidemiology of blueberry necrotic ring blotch virus of southern highbush blueberry in Georgia. M.S. thesis, Norfolk State University, Norfolk, Virginia. Google Scholar

    20.

    Rodrigues JCV, Childers CC. 2013. Brevipalpus mites (Acari: Tenuipalpidae): vectors of invasive, non-systemic cytoplasmic and nuclear viruses in plants. Experimental and Applied Acarology 59: 165–75. Google Scholar

    21.

    Roy A, Hartung JS, Schneider WL, Shao J, Leon MG, Melzer MJ, Beard JJ, Otero-Colina G, Bauchan GR, Ochoa R. 2015. Role bending: Complex relationships between viruses, hosts, and vectors related to citrus leprosis, an emerging disease. Phytopathology 105: 872–884. Google Scholar

    22.

    Salinas-Vargas D, Santillán-Galicia MT, Guzmán-Franco AW, Hernández-López AH, Ortega-Arenas LD, Mora-Aguilera G. 2016. Analysis of genetic variation in Brevipalpus yothersi (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) populations from four species of citrus host plants. Plos One 11: e0164552. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164552. Google Scholar

    23.

    Sarwar M. 2015. Mites (Acarina) as vectors of plant pathogens and relation of these pests to plant diseases. Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal 1: 150–156. Google Scholar

    24.

    Vacante V. 2015. The Handbook of Mites of Economic Plants: Identification, Bio-Ecology and Control, CABI, Wallingford, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

    25.

    Welbourn WC, Ochoa R, Kane EC, Erbe EF. 2003. Morphological observations on Brevipalpus phoenicis (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) including comparisons with B. californicus and B. obovatus. Experimental and Applied Acarology 30: 107–133. Google Scholar
    Rana Akyazi, Eddie A. Ueckermann, and Oscar E. Liburd "New Report of Brevipalpus yothersi (Prostigmata: Tenuipalpidae) on Blueberry in Florida," Florida Entomologist 100(4), 731-739, (1 December 2017). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0420
    Published: 1 December 2017
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    9 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top