Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2018 Undescribed Color Polymorphism of the Asiatic Palm Weevil, Rhynchophorus vulneratus Panzer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Indonesia: Biodiversity Study Based on COI Gene
Author Affiliations +

Palm weevils are notorious insect pests of coconut palms in Indonesia and other palm species worldwide. Indonesian palm weevils exhibiting a rusty red marking on the pronotum are classified as the red palm weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier; Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae). However, morphology-based identification and crossbreeding studies suggested that these insects are color morphs of the Asiatic palm weevil (Rhynchophorus vulneratus Panzer; Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae). The purpose of this study was to clarify the presence of undescribed color polymorphisms of the Asiatic palm weevil from Indonesia using a partial sequence of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. The COIs of 107 specimens of palm weevils collected from Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan were amplified using Folmer primers. COI analysis revealed high intraspecific variability in palm weevils from Indonesia and Saudi Arabia. Although Folmer primers of COI are powerful species identification tools in many taxa, they were unsuitable in this research for Indonesian palm weevils because interspecific variation was lower than intraspecific variation. This study concluded that undescribed color polymorphisms exist in the Asiatic palm weevil. The rusty red polymorphisms of the Asian palm weevil might be erroneously identified as R. ferrugineus.

Palm weevils, Rhynchophorus spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), are the second-most damaging insect pests on coconut palm, Cocos nucifera Linnaeus (Arecaceae) in Indonesia (Ernawati & Yuniarti 2013; Trisnadi 2014; Ratmawati 2015; Yulianto & Ernawati 2015). They also damage the sago palm (Metroxylon sagu Rottb.; Arecaceae), the solitary sugar palm (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb) Merrill.; Arecaceae), the oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.; Arecaceae), the large-leaved palm (Corypha gebanga Zelfst.; Arecaceae), the silver date palm (Phoenix sylvestris (L.)Roxb.; Arecaceae), and the African fan palm (Borassus flabellifer L.; Arecaceae) (Leefmans 1920). Severe infestation of coconut palm has been reported recently in East Java, which includes the districts of Ponorogo, Kediri, Jombang, and Probolinggo (Ernawati & Yuniarti 2013; Trisnadi 2014; Ratmawati 2015; Yulianto & Ernawati 2015).

Changes were made to the classification of weevil species in Indonesia. Three palm weevil species were previously identified: the red palm weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier; Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae), the Asiatic palm weevil (R. vulneratus Panzer; Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae), and the black palm weevil (R. bilineatus Montrouz ier; Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) (Wattanapongsiri 1966; Kalshoven 1981; Pracaya 1991). The red palm weevil was found in Java, whereas the Asiatic palm weevil and the black palm weevil were found in Sumatra and the eastern regions of Indonesia (Moluccas and Papua islands), respectively (Kalshoven 1981).

The morphological identification of the Indonesian palm weevils from Sumatra, Java, Madura, Bali, Sulawesi, and West Papua islands was reported by Sukirno et al. (2015). Twenty morphs of rusty red Asiatic palm weevil, 7 morphs of red stripe Asiatic palm weevil, 1 morph of intermediate palm weevil, and 4 morphs of black palm weevil were identified. The intermediate palm weevil specimens exhibited combinations of rusty red, much like red palm weevil, with a red stripe on the pronotum. Most of the rusty red Asiatic palm weevil and red stripe Asiatic palm weevil morphs coexist in the same colonies within the same host plants (Hallet et al. 2004; Sukirno et al. 2015). On the basis of morphometric analysis and mating experiments for up to 3 generations, these weevils were considered color-polymorphic R. vulneratus.

Unambiguous species identification is critical for pest control. The identification of color-polymorphic species, as in the case of palm weevils in this study, requires molecular approaches for confirming morphology-based identification. For example, cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) was used for the identification of palm weevils from 23 countries (Rugman-Jones et al. 2013), including southern and central Philippines (Abad et al. 2014). It also was used for the prediction of red palm weevil invasion in the Middle East and the Mediterranean basin (El-Mergawy et al. 2011a). Meanwhile, cytochrome b (CyB) and internal transcribed spacer ribosomal DNA (ITS-rDNA) markers have been used to reveal red palm weevil diversity in the Mediterranean Basin and Saudi Arabia (El-Mergawy et al. 2011b). Random amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR) has been carried out on the red palm weevil in the United Arab Emirates (Gadelhak & Enan 2005) and in 13 countries, including the Middle East, the Mediterranean Basin, and South Asia (El-Mergawy et al. 2011c).

The COI marker has been used in other insect species; for example, Grapputo et al. (2005) used it to reveal the invasion history of the North American and European Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and McKenzie et al. (2009) used it on the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Florida. Moreover, it has been applied in the identification of Australian fishes (Ward et al. 2005), North American birds (Kerr et al. 2007), longicorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) (Nakamine & Takeda 2008), whiteflies (Dinsdale et al. 2010), and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae: Platypodinae) (Chang et al. 2013). Some accuracy limitations of DNA barcoding for species identification have been reported in Diptera (Meier et al. 2006) and blue lycaenid butterflies (Wiemers & Fiedler 2007). Nevertheless, the COI marker remains a powerful tool for revealing species diversity, especially when working with degraded DNA material (Hajibabaei et al. 2006; Meusnier et al. 2008). It also has been widely used to complement morphology-based identification (Hajibabaei et al. 2007; Goldstein & DeSalle 2011), particularly for cryptic species (Hebert et al. 2004).

This study was designed to clarify palm weevil diversity on the 6 principal islands of Indonesia using the COI marker, and to evaluate its suitability for species-level identification. Our results served as a test of previous morphology-based identifications and documented the identity of Indonesian palm weevils. Rhynchophorus ferrugineus collected from Saudi Arabia and Pakistan were used for further confirmation. We hypothesized that the Asiatic palm weevil from Indonesia has undescribed “rusty red” polymorphisms that might cause it to be erroneously identified as R. ferrugineus.

Materials and Methods


Palm weevils were collected from 23 localities on 6 islands in Indonesia, covering 7 provinces (Table 1): Aceh Special Region (Sumatra island), Central Java (Java island), Jogjakarta Special Region (Java island), East Java (Java and Madura islands), Bali (Bali island), Gorontalo (Sulawesi island), and Sorong (West Papua island). The survey and collection were conducted between 2012 and 2014. Two populations of the red palm weevil in Alamariyah, the Riyadh Province of Saudi Arabia, and 4 populations from Khudai, the Punjab Province of Pakistan, were used for the comparisons. The weevils were preserved in 96% ethanol at 4 °C until further use.

The weevils were separated into the following categories based on their pronotum color pattern: the Asiatic palm weevil with rusty red morphs, the Asiatic palm weevil with red stripe morphs, the Asiatic palm weevil with intermediate morphs between rusty red and red stripe morphs, and the black palm weevil with or without longitudinal lines. Voucher specimens were deposited at the King Saud University Museum of Arthropods, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.


At least 3 individuals of each pronotal-marking category from each locality were used for the study. Approximately 2 mm3 of pronotal muscle tissue was taken by pulling it from the posterior side of the pronotum using sterilized fine forceps. The tissue was then placed into a 200 μL thin-wall PCR tube and dried in a vacuum rotary drier (Concentrator Plus, Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) at 45 °C for 10 min to remove the ethanol residue.


A modified alkaline lysis method was used to extract mitochondrial DNA from the muscle tissue samples for COI gene analysis (Wang et al. 1993; Collard et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2009). Approximately 25 μL of 50 mM NaOH solution was added to dried muscle tissue in thin-wall 200 μL PCR tubes, vortexed vigorously for 10 s, and spun down in a microcentrifuge (IKA? mini G IKA?-Werke GmbH and Co. KG, Staufen im Breisgau, Germany). The sample was then heated to 95 °C for 20 min in a PCR machine (GeneAmp? PCR System 9700, Applied Biosystem, Carlsbad, California, USA). The extract was left for 5 min at ambient temperature, followed by homogenization for 10 s using a vortex. About 25 μL of 200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) was added to each sample and then homogenized for 5 s using a vortex. The debris was precipitated in a centrifuge for 1 min at 10,000 rpm and 25 °C. Subsequently, 3 μL of the supernatant was used as the PCR template to amplify the COI gene region. The remaining extracts were stored at −20 °C for future use.


The COI gene was amplified in 30 μL of the KOD FX Neo polymerase kit solution (Toyobo Co., LTD, Osaka, Japan) that contained 0.2 μM each of LCO 1490 and HCO 2198 primers (Folmer et al. 1994) synthesized by IDT DNA technologies (IDT DNA, Leuven, Belgium) and 3 μL of crude DNA templates. DNA amplification was carried out in a thermocycler (GeneAmp? PCR System 9700 Applied Biosystem, Staufen im Breisgau, Germany) with a heated lid. The amplification protocol was as follows: initial denaturation by heating at 95 °C for 2 min; 35 amplification cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 48 °C for 30 s, and 68 °C for 40 s; and final extension at 68 °C for 5 min, followed by cooling down to 4 °C for an infinite time.

Table 1.

Localities (latitude and longitude) of palm weevil collections covering 7 provinces in Indonesia and several locations in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.



About 1 μL each of unpurified COI amplicon was checked using 1% gel agarose electrophoresis at 100 V for 25 min in 1 × TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) in an electrophoresis system (Mupid? - 2 Plus Submarine electrophoresis system, Takara, Tokyo, Japan). The 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) was used as a marker. The gels then were placed in ethidium bromide solution (4 μL per 200 mL of 1 × TAE). Staining was performed by gentle agitation and shaking for 30 min at 45 rpm on an orbital shaker (Orbital incubator SI 500 Stuart?, Bibby Scientific Ltd., Stone, Staffordshire, United Kingdom). The stained gels were visualized under UV light in a gel documentation system (BioDocAnalyze, Biometra, Gottingen, Denmark). The amplified PCR products of COI (about 700 bp) were sent for sequencing in both directions by using the Sanger method (BGI, Hong Kong, China).


Both directions of the COI sequences aligned separately in BioEdit ver. 7.2.2 (Hall 1999). The primers were trimmed to obtain 657 bp nucleotides (nt). Basic local alignment search tool of the nucleotides was carried out using NCBI GenBank databases to confirm the COI sequences obtained. The validated sequences then were aligned using ClustalW multiple alignments in the BioEdit program (Hall 1999). The Kimura 2-parameter model available in MEGA 6.06 (Tamura et al. 2013) was used to estimate the pattern and rate of substitution, transition/ transversion bias, and genetic diversity. This model also was employed to construct the neighbor joining phylogeny (Tamura et al. 2013) using 1,000 bootstrap values. The transition and transversion substitutions were included in the analysis. Gaps or missing data were treated as complete deletions.


The diversity of palm weevils representing 23 localities in Indonesia, 2 localities in Saudi Arabia, and 4 localities in Pakistan was identified using the COI marker. A total of 107 clean sequences were obtained from these localities. The comparison showed no insertion or deletion in any of the obtained sequences. The approximate transition and transversion bias (R) was 1.22. The relative frequencies of A, T, C, and G were 0.27, 0.34, 0.21, and 0.17, respectively. The transition and transversion substitution rates were 13.76 and 5.62, respectively. The present study revealed 5 conserved regions: TATACTTTATTTTTGG (8–25 nt), ATTATAATTTTTTTTATA (160–177 nt), GCAGGAACAGGTTGAACAGT (344–363 nt), TCTGTAGATT TAGCTATTTTTA-G (409–432 nt), and TATTAACTGACCGAAAT AT (619–637 nt). All the sequences have been deposited in the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD) with accession numbers PWINA001-16 to PWINA064-16, PWINA086-16 to PWINA118, and PWINA122-16 to PWINA132-16 (accessible at

A high variability in the COI gene within the populations of palm weevils analyzed in this study was revealed (Table 2). The majority of the weevils exhibited non-identical sequences regardless of the level of similarity in their pronotal phenotypes. Only 2 of the 107 sequences (1.9%) were identical. The multiple alignments showed that COI gene diversity within black palm weevil samples from Bali was the highest (d = 0.71), followed by the samples from Kebonalas B (d = 0.24). By contrast, COI genetic diversity in the samples of R. ferrugineus from Saudi Arabia and Pakistan was very low (< 0.001 and < 0.002, respectively). The genetic distance between populations representative of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan was 0.002 and 0.003, respectively. The overall genetic diversity of the COI gene within populations of R. vulneratus, R. bilineatus, and R. ferrugineus was higher than that between populations. On the basis of nucleotide diversity as measured by using the Kimura 2-parameter model, the average intrapopulation and interpopulation genetic diversities were 0.108 and 0.016, respectively.

Table 2.

Palm weevils collected from Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan and their genetic diversity within the populations on the basis of COI gene analysis.


The neighbor joining phylogenetic analysis of palm weevil populations (Table 1) comprised 105 haplotypes and revealed 3 lineages, which were designated as CA, CB, and CC (Fig. 1). Lineage CA was represented by a single sample of the black palm weevil (R. bilineatus) from Bali. Lineage CB composed Asiatic palm weevils with rusty red morphs from Kuwung B, Jetis E, and Madura A; the black palm weevil from Teminabuan and Aitinyo; and the Asiatic palm weevil with red stripes from Pemalang. Lineage CC was composed of Asiatic palm weevils with rusty red morphs, Asiatic palm weevil with red stripes, black palm weevil, and Asiatic palm weevil with morphs intermediate between rusty red and red stripe from Indonesia, and red palm weevil from Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

Lineages CB and CC could be separated into sub-clusters. Lineage CB was separated into 2 sub-clusters: SCB1, that comprised Asiatic palm weevils with rusty red morphs from Kuwung and Jetis, and black palm weevil from Teminabuan and Aitinyo; and SCB2 consisted of Asiatic palm weevil with red stripes from Pemalang, and Asiatic palm weevils with rusty red morphs from Madura. Lineage CC was separated into 48 subclusters. All red palm weevils from Pakistan were grouped into a single sub-cluster within lineage CC. This sub-cluster could be further separated into subgroups: subgroup Muzafargarh and Khudai (localities 1, 2, and 3) and subgroup Khudai (localities 1 and 2; Fig. 1). By contrast, the red palm weevils from Saudi Arabia were not clustered.


The Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture considers palm weevils (Rhynchophorus sp.) to be one of the most serious insect pests of coconut palms in Indonesia, especially in Java (Ernawati & Yuniarti 2013; Wibowo & Ernawati 2013; Trisnadi 2014; Ratmawati 2015; Yulianto & Ernawati 2015). These insects also have high potential as pests of oil palm plantations in Sumatra (Prasetyo et al. 2009). Yuliyanto and Ernawati (2015) estimated that Rhynchophorus has infested 2,340 ha of coconut plantations in East Java, and 200 ha have been treated using pheromone traps. Their results showed that palm weevils are the second most damaging pest of coconut palms, after the rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros (L.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).

Neighbor joining analysis based on the COI marker revealed that palm weevils' diversity was high. The Asiatic palm weevil with rusty red morphs, the Asiatic palm weevil with intermediate between rusty red and red stripe morphs, and the R. bilineatus from Indonesia, as well as R. ferrugineus from Saudi Arabia, were overlaps (Fig. 1). There were high genetic diversity in R. bilineatus from Bali (d = 0.72) and West Papua (d = 1.0), as well as the R. vulneratus samples from East Java (d = 1.3). Indonesia is known to be one of the mega biodiversity countries in the world (Brooks et al. 2006). Its climatic conditions are favorable for the growth of diverse organisms, including palm weevils. In this case, palm weevils lack attention, and no significant treatment of the infested palms has been made, thereby allowing the weevils to spread freely, disperse, and interbreed among populations. Inside an infested coconut tree, hundreds of weevils in different stages may be found. To date, most of the region's farmers still ignore the infested palms. A few decades ago, the grubs of weevils were considered edible insects (Ramandey & van Mastrigt 2010), but their popularity has declined. This scenario may have caused the weevils' population to increase. This high population density may have become the principal inducer of high diversity (Amos & Harwood 1998).

Fig. 1.

Genealogical relationship of 105 sequence haplotypes of palm weevils collected from Indonesia and Rhynchophorus ferrugineus from Saudi Arabia and Pakistan based on the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene (657 bp) using the neighbor joining method with 1,000 bootstraps. The colors indicate the palm weevil color morphs or species: - Asiatic palm weevil with rusty red morphs (APW-RR); - Asiatic red palm weevil with red stripe morphs (APW-RS); - Asiatic palm weevil with intermediate color between rusty red and red stripe morphs (APW-I); - black palm weevil (BPW as an outgroup); and - red palm weevil, R. ferrugineus (RPW). The numbers at the branching points indicate the bootstrap values. CA = Lineage A, CB = Lineage B, CC = Lineage C, SCA = Sub-cluster A, SCB = Sub-cluster B.


Neighbor joining analysis showed that red palm weevil populations from Saudi Arabia were not clustered, in contrast to those from Pakistan. In Saudi Arabia, a high frequency of date palm transportation was reported in the past few decades (Ministry of Agriculture 2014, personal communication), which possibly facilitated red palm weevil dispersal and interbreeding. By contrast, red palm weevil populations in Pakistan were isolated in several areas (Sind and Punjab), and only a few reports regarding this topic have been published. In 2009, 5.8% of the date palms in Sind Province were infested by red palm weevil (Abul-Soad et al. 2015). Furthermore, the GenBank database (, accessed in Aug 2016) indicated that some red palm weevils collected from the Punjab province have been used for molecular studies.

In this study, that involved 23 localities in Indonesia, the use of Folmer primers revealed 96 haplotypes from 96 specimens (100%). Rugman-Jones et al. (2013) used several primer combinations for the DNA barcoding of R. vulneratus from Indonesia. They collected from 7 palm weevil localities: 3 localities from Java, 3 localities from Sumatra, and 1 locality from Bali. In 107 sequences (528 bp), they identified 50 haplotypes (46.7%). The use of short partial sequences (220 bp) of COI for the identification of 2 palm weevil phenotypes in the Philippines implied that the phenotypes share high similarity (Abad et al. 2014). Our result was highly different than those previous reports. This may be explained by their use of short nucleotides, which differ from those targeted by Folmer primers in this work (651 bp). They also used small population samples in their analysis, which resulted in low intraspecific variation.

In this study, the intraspecific variation in Indonesian palm weevils' genetic diversity was higher than the interspecific variation. Thus, Folmer primers exhibited weak species separation. This result was in contrast to the findings reported by Rugman-Jones et al. (2013). They concluded that interspecific variation is higher than intraspecific variation on the basis of their analysis of COI sequences. Strong species separation was found, and the Asiatic palm weevil and the red palm weevil are valid separate taxa. They analyzed different color morphs of the Asiatic palm weevil via barcoding analysis but did not state that the Asiatic palm weevils have spotted color morphs. Evidence of the color morphs of the Asiatic palm weevil was strengthened by the work of Sukirno et al. (2015), who investigated morphometric variation and interbreeding.

The use of the COI marker for accurate species-level identification requires a high level of interspecific variation that is at least tenfold higher than intraspecific variation (Hebert et al. 2003; Gao et al. 2010). Folmer primers amplified partial sequences of the COI gene (657 bp, 1490–2198 nt) and exhibited 5 highly conserved regions in R. vulneratus (the Asiatic palm weevil with rusty red morphs, the Asiatic palm weevil with red stripe, and the Asiatic palm weevil with intermediate color between rusty red and red stripe morphs), R. bilineatus (the black palm weevil), and R. ferrugineus. The genetic variation within these species was higher than the interspecific variation. This high intraspecific diversity in the COI marker made it unsuitable to distinguish the species (Fig. 1). The difference between the study of Rugman-Jones et al. (2013) and this work suggests that the DNA barcode using Folmer primers provided enhanced sensitivity to genetic diversity (Meusnier et al. 2008). Nevertheless, for species identification, the use of other primers is suggested. This phenomenon of low accuracy of the COI gene in species identification has been observed in other insects, such as blue lycaenid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) (Wiemers & Friedler 2007) and Diptera (Meier et al. 2006).

The results support previous morphology-based identification, thereby confirming that 2 palm weevil species exist in Indonesia: R. vulneratus and R. bilineatus. Our findings also confirmed the presence of undescribed spotted rusty red morphs of the Asiatic palm weevil. Thus, the Asiatic palm weevils in Indonesia exhibit a wide range of color polymorphisms, namely, the Asiatic palm weevil with red stripe, the Asiatic palm weevil with rusty red, and the Asiatic palm weevil with intermediate color between red stripe and rusty red morphs.

We observed a high COI diversity in Indonesian R. vulneratus and R. bilineatus populations, as well as in R. ferrugineus from Saudi Arabia. However, the feasibility of using Folmer primers for species identification of these taxa was low. We determined that the Asiatic palm weevil has spotted rusty red polymorphisms, and this species previously was erroneously recognized as the red palm weevil. This determination is consistent with the previous conclusion that there are only 2 palm weevil species, R. vulneratus and R. bilineatus, in Indonesia.


The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for its funding of this Research group (No: RGP-1438-009). We thank Hani Zafran and E. Emad from the Ministry of Agriculture (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) for their valuable support during red palm weevil collection in Saudi Arabia. We thank the King Saud Museum of Arthropods (King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) for providing facilities for specimen observation. We also thank Sri Wahyuningsih, B. Barjono, Mohammad Syaryadhi, R. Rahmawati, S. Supadmi, and Fuad Asnawi for their technical support during specimen collection.

References Cited

  1. Abad RG, Bastian JSA, Catiempo RL, Salamanes ML, Nemenzo-Calica P, Rivera WL. 2014. Molecular profiling of different morphotypes under the genus Rhynchophorus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Central and Southern Philippines.Journal of Entomology and Nematology6: 122–133. Google Scholar

  2. Abul-Soad AA, Mahdi SM, Markhand GS. 2015. Date palm status and perspective in Pakistan, pp. 153–205 In Al-Khayri JM, Jain SM, Johnson DV [eds.], Date Palm Genetic Resources and Utilization, Vol 2: Asia and Europe.Springer, New York, USA. Google Scholar

  3. Amos W, Harwood J. 1998. Factors affecting levels of genetic diversity in natural populations.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences353: 177–186. Google Scholar

  4. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL. 2006. Global biodiversity conservation priorities.Science313: 58–61. Google Scholar

  5. Chang H, Liu Q, Hao D, Liu Y, An Y, Qian L, Yang X. 2013. DNA barcodes and molecular diagnostics for distinguishing introduced Xyleborus (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) species in China.Mitochondrial DNA25: 63–69. Google Scholar

  6. Collard BCY, Das A, Virk PS, Mackill DJ. 2007. Evaluation of ‘quick and dirty’ DNA extraction methods for marker assisted selection in rice (Oryza sativa L.).Plant Breeding126: 47–50. Google Scholar

  7. Dinsdale A, Cook L, Riginos C, Buckley YM, Barro PD. 2010. Refined global analysis of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodoidea: Aleyrodidae) mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 to identify species level genetic boundaries.Annals of the Entomological Society of America103: 196–208. Google Scholar

  8. El-Mergawy RAAM, Al-Ajlan AM, Abdallah N, Vassiliou V, Capdevielle-Dulac C. 2011b. Preliminary study on geographical variation of cytochrome b gene and ITS2-rDNA among populations of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus.Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology B1: 189–197. Google Scholar

  9. El-Mergawy RAAM, Al-Ajlan AM, Abdallah NA, Nasr MI, Silvain J. 2011c. Determination of different geographical populations of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) using RAPD-PCR.International Journal of Agriculture and Biology13: 227–232. Google Scholar

  10. El-Mergawy RAAM, Faure N, Nasr MI, Avand-Faghih A, Rochat D, Silvain J. 2011a. Mitochondrial genetic variation and invasion history of red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in the Middle East and Mediterranean Basin.International Journal of Agriculture and Biology13: 631–637. Google Scholar

  11. Ernawati F, Yuniarti F. 2013. Rhynchophorus spp., a deadly insect pest of coconut.BBPPT Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia: 1–7 (in Indonesian). Google Scholar

  12. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology3: 294–299. Google Scholar

  13. Gadelhak GG, Enan MR. 2005. Genetic diversity among populations of red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), determined by random amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR).International Journal of Agriculture and Biology7: 395–399. Google Scholar

  14. Gao T, Yao H, Song J, Zhu Y, Liu C, Chen S. 2010. Evaluating the feasibility of using candidate DNA barcodes in discriminating species of the large Asteraceae family.BMC Evolutionary Biology10: 324. Scholar

  15. Goldstein PZ, DeSalle R. 2011. Integrating DNA barcode data and taxonomic practice: determination, discovery, and description.Bioessays33: 135–147. Google Scholar

  16. Grapputo A, Boman S, Lindstroem L, Lyytinen A, Mappes J. 2005. The voyage of an invasive species across continents: genetic diversity of North American and European Colorado potato beetle populations.Molecular Ecology14: 4207–4219. Google Scholar

  17. Hajibabaei M, Singer GA, Hebert PD, Hickey DA. 2007. DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics.Trends in Genetics23: 167–172. Google Scholar

  18. Hajibabaei M, Smith M, Janzen DH, Rodriguez JJ, Whitfield JB, Hebert PDN. 2006. A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded.Molecular Ecology Notes6: 959–964. Google Scholar

  19. Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis for Windows 95/98/NT.Nucleic Acids Symposium Series41: 95–98. Google Scholar

  20. Hallett RH, Crespi BJ, Borden JH. 2004. Synonymy of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier), 1790 and R. vulneratus (Panzer), 1798 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Rhynchophorinae).Journal of Natural History38: 2863–2882. Google Scholar

  21. Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences270: 313–321. Google Scholar

  22. Hebert PD, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the Neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America101: 14812–14817. Google Scholar

  23. Kalshoven LGE. 1981. Pests of Crops in Indonesia.P. T. Ichtiar Baru, Van Hoeve, Jakarta. Google Scholar

  24. Kerr KCR, Stoeckle MY, Dove CJ, Weigt LA, Francis CM, Hebert PDN. 2007. Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds.Molecular Ecology Resources7: 535–543. Google Scholar

  25. Leefmans S. 1920. De Palmsnuitkever, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. Mededelingen van het Instituut voor Plantenziekten No. 43.Departement van Landbouw, Nijverheld en Handel, Batavia (Jakarta), Indonesia (in Dutch). Google Scholar

  26. McKenzie CL, Hodges G, Osborne LS, Byrne FJ, Shatters RG. 2009. Distribution of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotypes in Florida–investigating the Q invasion.Journal of Economic Entomology102: 670–676. Google Scholar

  27. Meier R, Shiyang K, Vaidya G, Ng PKL. 2006. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success.Systematic Biology55: 715–728. Google Scholar

  28. Meusnier I, Singer GAC, Landry JF, Hickey DA, Hebert PDN, Hajibabaei M. 2008. A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis.BMC Genomics9: 214. Google Scholar

  29. Nakamine H, Takeda M. 2008. Molecular phylogenetic relationships of flightless beetles belonging to the genus Mesechthistatus Breuning (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) inferred from mitochondrial COI gene sequences.Journal of Insect Science8: 1–11. Google Scholar

  30. Pracaya. 1991. Pests and Diseases of Plants.Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta, Indonesia (in Indonesian). Google Scholar

  31. Prasetyo AE, Susanto A, Utomo C, Herawan T. 2009. The synergism of two aggregation pheromones for the control of Oryctes rhinoceros and Rhynchophorus spp. in oil palm plantations.Jurnal Penelitian Kelapa Sawit17: 23–29 (in Indonesian). Google Scholar

  32. Ramandey E, van Mastrigt H. 2010. Edible insects in Papua, Indonesia: from delicious snack to basic need, pp. 105–114 In Patrick BD, Dennis VJ, Robin NL, Kenichi S [eds.], Forest Insects as Food: Human Bites Back.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand. Google Scholar

  33. Ratmawati I. 2015. The infestation level of insect pests on coconut plantations in Probolinggo District on May 2015.Buletin DISHUTBUN Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia: 1–7 (in Indonesian). Google Scholar

  34. Rugman-Jones PF, Hoddle CD, Hoddle MS, Stouthamer R. 2013. The lesser of two weevils: molecular-genetics of pest palm weevil populations confirm Rhynchophorus vulneratus (Panzer 1798) as a valid species distinct from R. ferrugineus (Olivier 1790) and reveal the global extent of both.PloS One8: e78379. Google Scholar

  35. Sukirno S, Tufail M, Rasool KG, Aldawood AS. 2015. Palm weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) diversity in Indonesia: a morphometric approach reveals the Indonesian palm weevils identity.Paper presented at the Entomological Society of America Symposia, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Google Scholar

  36. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetic analysis version 6.0.Molecular Biology and Evolution30: 2725–2729. Google Scholar

  37. Trisnadi R. 2014. Sago worm (Rhynchophorus sp.), the main cause of coconut palm death.Article DISHUTBUN Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia: 1–6 (in Indonesian). Google Scholar

  38. Wang CT, Wang XZ, Tang YY, Zhang JC, Yu SL, Xu JZ, Bao ZM. 2009. A rapid and cheap protocol for preparation of PCR templates in peanut.Electronic Journal of Biotechnology12: 1–6. Google Scholar

  39. Wang H, Qi M, Cutler AJ. 1993. A simple method of preparing plant samples for PCR.Nucleic Acids Research21: 4153–4154. Google Scholar

  40. Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert DNP. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences360: 1847–1857. Google Scholar

  41. Wattanapongsiri A. 1966. A revision of the genera Rhynchophorus and Dynamis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).Department of Agriculture Science Bulletin, Bangkok, Thailand. Google Scholar

  42. Wibowo E, Ernawati D. 2013. The infestations of Rhynchophorus spp. on coconut plantations in East Java Province on September 2012.Buletin BBPPT DITJENBUN Agriculture Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia: 1–8 (in Indonesian). Google Scholar

  43. Wiemers M, Fiedler K. 2007. Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? A case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae).Frontiers in Zoology4: 1–16. Google Scholar

  44. Yuliyanto Y, Ernawati D. 2015. The infestation of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus in East Java.Buletin DITJENBUN BBPPT Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia: 1–7 (in Indonesian). Google Scholar

Sukirno Sukirno, Muhammad Tufail, Khawaja Ghulam Rasool, and Abdulrahman Saad Aldawood "Undescribed Color Polymorphism of the Asiatic Palm Weevil, Rhynchophorus vulneratus Panzer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Indonesia: Biodiversity Study Based on COI Gene," Florida Entomologist 101(4), (1 December 2018).
Published: 1 December 2018

Back to Top