In 2017, Brazil produced 37,664 tons of Brazil nuts (Bertholletia excelsa Bonpl.) (Lecythidaceae) (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística 2017). Production of these nuts is economically and socially significant, resulting in income and employment for thousands of families, and simultaneously ensuring conservation of the species and the forest environment (Santos 2012).
The requirement of national and international markets for highquality Brazil nuts for consumers has led to high collection and storage standards. Storage units are being built to promote adequate storage until processing. Among the problems involved in the storage of agricultural products are stored grain pests that are responsible for significant losses in rice, corn, soybeans, sorghum etc. (Martins et al. 1985; Santos et al. 2002; Caneppele et al. 2003; Silva et al. 2003; Alves et al. 2008; Faroni & Silva 2008; Elias et al. 2009; Alencar et al. 2011). Significant potential for damage to stored Brazil nuts also has been reported (Pires et al. 2017; Pires & Nogueira 2018).
In Brazil, there are a few species reportedly attacking B. excelsa under storage conditions. Among these are coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei Wood & Bright (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) (Gumier-Costa 2009), and Indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella Hübner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) (Gomes et al. 2015).
The occurrence of moths such as Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Sitotroga cerealella Olivier (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in grain storage units causes significant losses to grains (Quirino 2008). Ephestia kuehniella, also known as Mediterranean flour moth, is classified as a secondary pest of stored grains. Sitotroga cerealella, also known as Angoumois grain moth, is a primary pest of stored grains (Pacheco & Paula 1995; Puzzi 2000). The objective of this research was to determine if E. kuehniella and S. cerealella feed on Brazil nuts, and to describe the type of damage to Brazil nuts caused by these Lepidoptera.
Ten adults of E. kuehniella or S. cerealella were kept in plastic containers (13 cm diam × 16 cm ht) with Brazil nuts to obtain the eggs. After the appearance of the eggs on the surface of the nuts, each nut with an egg mass was separated and kept in a different 200 mL plastic container to facilitate the monitoring of this stage.
After egg hatch, groups of 10 E. kuehniella or 10 S. cerealella larvae were transferred to a 50 mL plastic container and provided with intact Brazil nuts, which were evaluated daily to observe the occurrence of surface lesions. Feeding by E. kuehniella and S. cerealella larvae was observed using a stereomicroscope (Model SZ0745TH, Diagtech Comércio e Importação Ltda., São Paulo, Brazil) situated in the Laboratory of Pests and Vectors of Amazon/Cerrado of the Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - Campus de Sinop to help characterize the damage caused by these insects. Evaluation was terminated after the completion of the larval stage.
Ephestia kuehniella and S. cerealella larvae fed on intact Brazil nuts demonstrated that they are primary pests and capable of causing losses to this product under storage conditions. After 24 h exposure with intact Brazil nuts, E. kuehniella and S. cerealella larvae were found to produce superficial scratching in several areas (Figs. 1A, 2A–B). After 7 d, larger lesions were observed that altered the shape of the nuts (Figs. 1B, 2C). After longer periods of time, significant damage that completely changed the shape of the nuts was observed (Figs. 1C, 2D). Also, after 7 d, the nuts were covered with webbing woven by the larvae that prevented their release when tipping the jar (Figs. 1D–E, 2E–F).
Both E. kuehniella and S. cerealella larvae may be considered as primary pests of Brazil nuts due to their habit of digging galleries on the surface of the nut. They are responsible for causing lesions that initially appear in the form of superficial scrapes and subsequently in the form of tunnels that eventually modify the shape of the nut. Thus, these insects are potentially serious pests of this product, capable of producing both qualitative and quantitative damage. This type of damage is consistent with injury observed in other stored products (Santos et al. 1990). This damage also may lead to loss of germination potential (Santos et al. 1990). In addition, the webbing may be considered a contaminant that may hamper the handling and processing of this product by industry. It also may lead to problems similar to those reported in mills caused by webbing damaging machine components (Lorini et al. 2010).
We conclude that E. kuehniella and S. cerealella should be included in the list of pests that have the potential to generate considerable losses in stored Brazil nut, and may be classified as primary pests. Feeding by larvae leads to loss of quality and market value.
We acknowledge the students of Agronomy and Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, and also the agronomists for their technical support.
- Alencar ER, Faroni LRD, Ferreira LG, Costa AR, Pimentel MAG. 2011. Qualidade de milho armazenado e infestado por.Revista Engenharia na Agricultura19: 9–18. Google Scholar
- Alves WM, Faroni LRD, Alencar ER, Paes JL. 2008. Influência do inseto-praga Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera-Curculionidae) na taxa respiratória e na perda de matéria seca durante o armazenamento de milho.Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - REVENG16: 260–269. Google Scholar
- Caneppele MAB, Caneppele C, Lázzari FA, Lázzari SMN. 2003. Correlation between the infestation level of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, 1855 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and the quality factors of stored corn, Zea mays L. (Poaceae).Revista Brasileira de Entomologia47: 625–630. Google Scholar
- Elias MC, Lorini I, Mallamann CA, Dilkin P, Oliveria M, Mallaman AO. 2009. Manejo integrado no controle de pragas de grãos e derivados, pp. 305–353 In Elias MC, Oliveira M [eds.], Aspectos Tecnológicos e Legais na Formação de Auditores Técnicos do Sistema Nacional de Certificação de Unidades Armazenadoras.Gráfica Santa Cruz, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Google Scholar
- Faroni LRDA, Silva JS. 2008. Manejo de pragas no ecossistema de grãos armazenados, pp. 371–406 In Silva JS [ed.], Secagem e Armazenagem de Produtos Agrícolas.Editora Aprenda Fácil, Vicosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Google Scholar
- Gomes FB, Krug C, Tavares JG. 2015. First record of the indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hubner 1813) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) for Brazil nut.Bioscience Journal31: 1708–1710. Google Scholar
- Gumier-Costa F. 2009. First record of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in Pará nut, Bertholletia excelsa (Lecythidaceae).Neotropical Entomology38: 430–431. Google Scholar
- Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.2017. Pevs 2016: produção da silvicultura e da extração vegetal.2017. https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2013-agencia-de-noticias/releases/16981-pevs-2016-producao-da-silvicultura-e-da-extracao-vegetal-alcanca-r-18-5-bilhoes.html (last accessed 6 Feb 2018). Google Scholar
- Lorini I, Krzyzanowski FC, França-Neto JDB, Henning AA. 2010. Principais pragas e métodos de controle em sementes durante o armazenamento.Informativo ABRATES19: 21–28. Google Scholar
- Martins DS, Faroni LRD, Silva FAP, Souza FF. 1985. Avaliação das perdas antes da colheita e no armazenamento do milho, pelo gorgulho Sitophilus sp. e pela traça Sitotroga cerealella na microrregião de Viçosa.Revista Brasileira de Armazenamento10: 6–8. Google Scholar
- Pacheco IA, Paula DC. 1995. Insetos de Grãos Armazenados – Identificação e Biologia. Technical Report, Fundação Cargil.Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Google Scholar
- Pires EM, Nogueira RM. 2018. Damage caused by Rhyzopertha dominica (Fabricius, 1792) (Coleoptera : Bostrichidae) in stored Brazil nuts.Scientific Electronic Archives11: 57–61. Google Scholar
- Pires EM, Souza EQ, Nogueira RM, Soares MA, Dias TKR, Oliveira MA. 2017. Damage caused by Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in stored Brazil nut.Scientific Electronic Archives10: 1–5. Google Scholar
- Puzzi D. 2000. Abastecimento e Armazenamento de Grãos. Editora Agricola.Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Google Scholar
- Quirino JR. 2008. Resfriamento Artificial de Grãos de Milho em Armazém Graneleiro Horizontal.(Mestrado em Agronomia) Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Goias, Brasil. Google Scholar
- Santos AK, Faroni LRD, Guedes RNC, Santos JP Dos, Rozazdo AF. 2002. Nível de dano econômico de Sitophilus zeamais (M.) em trigo armazenado.Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental6: 273–279. Google Scholar
- Santos JC. 2012. Árvore do conhecimento castanha-do-brasil.Agência Embrapa de Informação Tecnológica. https://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/gestor/castanha-do-brasil/arvore/CONT000fthdobw602wyiv80otz6x94idbylx.html. (last accessed 6 Dec 2018). Google Scholar
- Santos JP, Maia JDG, Cruz I. 1990. Efeito da infestação pelo gorgulho (Sitophilus zeamais) e traça (Sitotroga cerealella) sobre a germinação de sementes de milho.Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira25: 1687–1692. Google Scholar
- Silva AAL, Faroni LRDA, Guedes RNC, Martins JH, Pimentel MAG. 2003. Modelagem das perdas causadas por Sitophilus zeamais e Rhyzopertha dominica em trigo armazenado.Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental7: 292–296. Google Scholar