Translator Disclaimer
11 April 2019 Opportunistic Predation by Leaf-Cutting Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on a Wounded Baird's Tapir (Mammalia: Perissodactyla: Tapiridae) in Mexico
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Notwithstanding their specialized herbivorous diet, leaf-cutting ants opportunistically exploit temporary resources such as insect or vertebrate carcasses. We report on the first case of attine workers, Atta cephalotes (L.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), foraging on the scar tissues of a living vertebrate, a wounded female Baird's tapir, Tapirus bairdii (Gill) (Mammalia: Perissodactyla: Tapiridae). We put forward 2, not mutually exclusive, hypotheses to explain such behavior: (1) utilization by the leaf-cutting ants of these tissues as a resource that provides rare essential nutrients, and (2) opportunistic sampling of polymicrobial communities associated with the skin of the wounded animal in search of new strains of their associated actinobacteria.

Attine ants constitute a monophyletic group that, even when considering adults can use other resources such as sap or extrafloral nectar (Littledyke & Cherrett 1976; Quinlan & Cherrett 1979), are obligately dependent on the cultivation of fungus gardens for food (Mehdiabadi & Schultz 2010; Branstetter et al. 2017). Higher attines of the genera Acromyrmex, Atta, Sericomyrmex, and Trachymyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) are highly selective herbivores, showing preferences in their plant choice for the fungus culture (Masiulionis et al. 2013). However, despite their specialized diet, most species of these genera are polyphagous, and opportunistically forage on temporary resources, from dry plant material to seeds, insect frass, carcasses, or even fungal basidiocarps (De Fine Licht & Boomsma 2010; Masiulionis et al. 2013). The leaf-cutting ants Acromyrmex and Atta, for example, are recruited to sardine baits (Santos-Junior et al. 2014) and pitfall traps baited with pig or rodent carcasses (Killion 1991; Cruz & Vasconcelos 2006; Moretti et al. 2008; Fonseca et al. 2015), and are often the first arthropods to find and dominate these resources. However, to date, not a single case of attine ants foraging on a living vertebrate has been recorded. Here, we report an atypical observation of Atta cephalotes (L.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) workers actively foraging on the wounds and scar tissues of a female Tapirus bairdii (Gill) (Mammalia: Perissodactyla: Tapiridae), an endangered flagship vertebrate species of Mesoamerica, found injured on communal land within the Municipality of Calakmul (Campeche, Mexico), and propose some hypotheses that could explain such behavior.

Tapirs are primarily nocturnal and crepuscular large mammals; all are strictly herbivorous and classified as endangered or vulnerable (García et al. 2016). Baird's tapir is the largest of the American tapirs, ranging from 1.8 to 2.5 m in length, 0.73 to 1.20 m height, and 150 to 300 kg in weight (Reid 1997; Foerster & Vaughan 2002). With the exception of humans, who despite protective laws, still hunt them in various regions (Matola et al. 1997), their primary predators are jaguars, pumas, and crocodiles (Naranjo 2009). On 26 May 2017, inhabitants of the Nueva Vida ejido (communities in Mexico that share communally farmed land) in the Calakmul Municipality, Campeche, found a female Baird's tapir seriously injured (most probably due to the attack of a jaguar) and contacted one of us (JPF). The female was lethargic and possessed several wounds in different stages of healing on both sides of the muzzle, neck, flanks, and rump. Wounds were variable in depth and shape, with some releasing a purulent secretion. The tapir was transported to the facilities of the Mexican National Commission of Natural Protected Areas located in the ejido of “Zoh Laguna” (18.5963°N, 89.4135°W) and kept in a handling pen for approximately 20 d. The animal was fed predominantly with Maya nut (Brosimum alicastrum Swartz) (Moraceae), trumpet tree (Cecropia peltata L.) (Urticaceae), chaya (Cnidoscolus aconitifolius (Miller) IM Johnston) (Euphorbiaceae), papaya (Carica papaya L.) (Caricaceae), and chaca (Bursera simaruba (L.) Sargent) (Burseraceae), which also were foraged by ants present at this site. Unexpectedly, on 30 and 31 May, numerous workers of the leaf-cutting ant A. cephalotes were observed exploring the body of the injured animal, foraging upon the scars, cutting small pieces of the hypertrophied scar tissue, and taking them back to their nest. Up to 7 workers were observed foraging simultaneously on the scars for approximately 10 min (Fig. 1 and Supplementary video [online]). Ant samples were brought to the lab for species identification; however, as the tapir was transferred to a zoological institution until its complete physical recovery, no follow-up studies were undertaken.

The capacity of ants to skeletonize vertebrate carcasses has been long considered to be common knowledge, and reports on ants feeding on vertebrate carcasses as an opportunistic food source are quite common (Moretti et al. 2008, 2013; Facure & Giaretta 2009; Maciel et al. 2015, 2016; Paula et al. 2016). However, some ant species also are known for their predatory behavior on small living vertebrates, and can constitute a real threat for some species. This is the case for various invasive species such as the fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), which has had negative impact on numerous ground dwelling vertebrates such as birds, amphibians, and turtles (Wojcik et al. 2001; Allen et al. 2004; Wetterer & Moore 2005; Thawley & Langkilde 2016). Conversely, predation by ants on large, living vertebrates is almost unknown; the only observed cases refer to army ants and, even here, there are very few reliable reports, and these refer only to immobile injured and trapped animals (Moffett 2010). Our observations regarding the foraging of A. cephalotes workers on scar tissues of T. bairdii were quite remarkable for 3 reasons. First, because foraged material gathered by A. cephalotes usually consists essentially of plant materials that are used as substrate for the growth of symbiotic fungus; second, because foraging on scar tissues by A. cephalotes involved a large, living mammal; and finally, because tapirs do not usually tolerate ants and, in most cases, stop feeding on any food that is subject to ant invasion. It is worth noting that the foraging behavior recorded here occurred in semi-captivity and concerned an individual in a lethargic state. We cannot guarantee whether this behavior would be repeated under natural conditions, or have any real impact on the endangered Baird's tapir. However, cutaneous wounds are one of the most frequent medical problems reported for captive and free-ranging tapirs (Mangini et al. 2012) and could represent a naturally available resource for ant foraging.

Fig. 1.

Workers of the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes foraging on a wounded living Tapirus bairdii female: (A) 7 workers (see arrows) on the scar tissues of a wound on the right flank of the tapir female; (B) Close up of 2 Atta cephalotes (see arrows) foraging on the scar tissues of the female Baird's tapir. In the upper part of the picture, a worker is cutting small pieces of the hypertrophied scar tissue.

f01_251.jpg

Foraging plasticity and diet flexibility in ants are not uncommon, and can result in such drastic changes as those reported for the seedeating Brachyponera sennaarensis (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), which can shift from an essentially granivorous to carnivorous diet, depending on the particular nature of the environmental constraints (Lachaud & Dejean 1994). According to De Fine Licht & Boomsma (2010), nutritional constraints of ants or their fungus may select for diversified diet, which is exhibited occasionally by attine ants. For example, it is known that during the dry season, when the preferred plant items are not available, attine ants tend to diversify the items retrieved and carried to their nest, and this can include insect corpses (Leal & Oliveira 2000). In the case of the genera Cyphomyrmex, Mycetophylax, Mycocepurus, and Myrmicocrypta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), which have been reported to collect insect carcasses, De Fine Licht & Boomsma (2010) suggest that such items may not be used as a direct substrate for fungal growth, but as a resource for rare essential nutrients. In addition, vertebrate carcasses can serve as a source of humidity, or as an indirect or direct food source; furthermore, they are rich in sodium, a limiting nutrient particularly sought by herbivorous species such as leaf-cutting ants (O'Donnell et al. 2010; Pizarro et al. 2012). An alternative hypothesis that would explain the diversified diet of some attine species, not precluding the search for essential nutrients, is the search for different items that might provide ants with different strains of their associated bacteria, and we suggest this might be the explanation of the atypical behavior reported here.

Fungus-growing ants are involved in a very specialized tripartite mutualism with the symbiotic fungi they culture and antimicrobialproducing actinomycete bacteria that reside on their cuticle (Currie et al. 1999). They accumulate complex, dynamic biofilms on their cuticle, carrying a diversity of actinobacteria that may play a role in protection against ant diseases and in their gardens (Mueller 2012). Until recently it was thought that the fungus-attine ants-actinobacteria tripartite mutualism was a very co-evolved symbiosis with both the fungus and the bacteria vertically transmitted (Currie et al. 1999). However, recent studies show that leaf-cutting ants also have windows of opportunity for horizontal fungal symbiont transmission during colony founding (Poulsen et al. 2009), and evidence of recruitment of useful antibiotic-producing actinomycetes from the environment is growing, suggesting that ants might select and maintain only those species that make useful antibiotics (Mueller 2012). A combination of co-evolution and environmental sampling would result in the diversity of actinomycete symbionts and antibiotics associated with attine ants (Barke et al. 2010; Mueller 2012). Such a strategy might allow the ants to take advantage of multiple antimicrobials with diverse activities, enabling defense against different pathogens and helping to restrict the evolution of pathogenic resistance. Actinobacteria are present on the skin and cuticle of many vertebrates and invertebrates, respectively (Miao & Davies 2010), so it is not unlikely that Atta ants could obtain different strains of their associated bacteria from insect and vertebrate carcasses. Furthermore, in tissue injury, microbes enter the wound where the physical environment differs from the skin surface in temperature, pH, nutrient availability, and host immune effectors, providing opportunities for commensal microbes to become virulent. Chronic non-healing wounds are host to polymicrobial (mixed fungal-bacterial) communities that can form biofilms and interfere with the healing processes (Kalan et al. 2016), but may also be a source of associated bacteria for ants. Tapir skin bacteriome remains unknown; however, Actinomyces (Actinomycetaceae) species have been found already in the purulent exudate drawn from an abscess in Tapirus terrestris (L.) (Mammalia: Perrisodactyla: Tapiridae) (Alexander 1978), so it is not unlikely that the T. bairdii's scar tissues foraged by A. cephalotes could host such polymicrobial communities.

We thank the authorities of the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve and the municipality of Calakmul for their support. Special thanks to Antonio López Cen for his invaluable help in the field and during the recovery, to Julian Flavell for language revision, and to John L. Capinera and 2 anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and edits on a previous draft.

References Cited

  1. Alexander ID. 1978. Actinomyces infection in a tapir (Tapirus terrestris).Journal of Zoo Animal Medicine9: 124–126. Google Scholar

  2. Allen CR, Epperson DM, Garmenstani AS. 2004. Red imported fire ant impacts on wildlife: a decade of research.American Midland Naturalist152: 88–103. Google Scholar

  3. Barke J, Seipke RF, Grüschow S, Heavens D, Drou N, Bibb MJ, Goss RJM, Yu DW, Hutchings MI. 2010. A mixed community of actinomycetes produce multiple antibiotics for the fungus farming ant Acromyrmex octospinosus.BMC Biology8: 109. doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-8-109 Google Scholar

  4. Branstetter MG, Ješovnik A, Sosa-Calvo J, Lloyd MW, Faircloth BC, Brady SG, Schultz TR. 2017. Dry habitats were crucibles of domestication in the evolution of agriculture in ants.Proceedings of the Royal Society B284: 20170095. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0095 Google Scholar

  5. Cruz TM, Vasconcelos SD. 2006. Entomofauna de solo associada à decomposição de carcaça de suíno em um fragmento de mata atlântica de Pernambuco, Brasil.Biociências14: 193–201. Google Scholar

  6. Currie CR, Scott JA, Summerbell RC, Malloch D. 1999. Fungus-growing ants use antibiotic-producing bacteria to control garden parasites.Nature398: 701–705. Google Scholar

  7. De Fine Licht HH, Boomsma JJ. 2010. Forage collection, substrate preparation, and diet composition in fungus-growing ants.Ecological Entomology35: 259–269. Google Scholar

  8. Facure KG, Giaretta AA. 2009. Semi-terrestrial tadpoles as a vertebrate prey of trap-jaw ants (Odontomachus, Formicidae).Herpetology Notes2: 63–66. Google Scholar

  9. Foerster C, Vaughan C. 2002. Home range, habitat use, and activity of Baird's tapir in Costa Rica.Biotropica34: 423–437. Google Scholar

  10. Fonseca AR, Campos RBF, Silva GF. 2015. Formigas em carcaças de Rattus norvegicus (Berkenhout) em uma área de cerrado no sudeste do Brasil: riqueza e abundância.EntomoBrasilis8: 74–78. Google Scholar

  11. García M, Jordan C, O'Farril G, Poot C, Meyer N, Estrada N, Leonardo R, Naranjo E, Simons Á, Herrera A, Urgilés C, Schank C, Boshoff L, Ruiz-Galeano M. 2016. Tapirus bairdii.The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species2016:e.T21471A45173340.  http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T21471A45173340.en  Google Scholar

  12. Kalan L, Loesche M, Hodkinson BP, Heilmann K, Ruthel G, Gardner SE, Grice EA. 2016. Redefining the chronic-wound microbiome: fungal communities are prevalent, dynamic, and associated with delayed healing.mBio7: e01058-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01058-16 Google Scholar

  13. Killion MJ. 1991. Use of vertebrate tissue by the leaf-cutting ant Atta texana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini).Southwestern Entomologist36: 116–117. Google Scholar

  14. Lachaud J-P, Dejean A. 1994. Predatory behavior of a seed-eating ant: Brachyponera senaarensis.Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata72: 145–155. Google Scholar

  15. Leal IR, Oliveira PS. 2000. Foraging ecology of attine ants in a Neotropical savanna: seasonal use of fungal substrate in the cerrado vegetation of Brazil.Insectes Sociaux47: 376–382. Google Scholar

  16. Littledyke M, Cherrett JM. 1976. Direct ingestion of plant sap from cut leaves by the leaf-cutting ants Atta cephalotes (L.) and Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich) (Formicidae, Attini).Bulletin of Entomological Research66: 205–217. Google Scholar

  17. Maciel TT, Barbosa BC, Santos-Prezoto HH, Prezoto F. 2016. Record and foraging behavior of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in vertebrate carcasses.Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences38: 491–494. Google Scholar

  18. Maciel TT, Castro MM, Barbosa BC, Fernandes EF, Santos-Prezoto HH, Prezoto F. 2015. Foraging behavior of fire ant Solenopsis saevissima (Smith) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Felis catus Linnaeus (Carnivora, Felidae) carcass.Sociobiology62: 610–612. Google Scholar

  19. Mangini PR, Medici EP, Fernandes Santos RC. 2012. Tapir health and conservation medicine.Integrative Zoology7: 331–345. Google Scholar

  20. Masiulionis VE, Weber RVS, Pagnocca FC. 2013. Foraging of Psilocybe basidiocarps by the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis in Santa Fé, Argentina.SpringerPlus2: 254. doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-254 Google Scholar

  21. Matola S, Cuaron AD, Rubio-Torgler H. 1997. Status and action plan of Baird's tapir (Tapirus bairdii), pp. 29–45 In Brooks DM, Bodmer RE, Matola S [eds.] Tapirs – Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Tapir Specialist Group.IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

  22. Mehdiabadi N, Schultz TR. 2010. Natural history and phylogeny of the fungusfarming ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae: Attini).Myrmecological News13: 37–55. Google Scholar

  23. Miao V, Davies J. 2010. Actinobacteria: the good, the bad, and the ugly.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek98: 143–150. Google Scholar

  24. Moffett MW. 2010. Adventures Among Ants: A Global Safari With a Cast of Trillions.University of California Press, Berkley, California, USA. Google Scholar

  25. Moretti TC, Ribeiro OB, Thyssen PJ, Solis DR. 2008. Insects on decomposing carcasses of small rodents in a secondary forest in Southeastern Brazil.European Journal of Entomology105: 691–696. Google Scholar

  26. Moretti TC, Solis DR, Godoy WAC. 2013. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) collected with carrion-baited traps in Southeast Brazil.Open Forensic Science Journal6: 1–5. Google Scholar

  27. Mueller UG. 2012. Symbiont recruitment versus ant-symbiont co-evolution in the attine ant–microbe symbiosis.Current Opinion in Microbiology15: 269–277. Google Scholar

  28. Naranjo EJ. 2009. Ecology and conservation of Baird's tapir in Mexico.Tropical Conservation Science2: 140–158. Google Scholar

  29. O'Donnell S, Garcia CJM, Beard J, Chiwocha T, Lewis D, Liu C, Phillips H, Williams T. 2010. Leaf cutter ants (Atta cephalotes) harvest baits offering sodium chloride rewards.Insectes Sociaux57: 205–208. Google Scholar

  30. Paula MC, Morishita GM, Cavarson CH, Gonçalves CR, Tavares PRA, Mendonça A, Súarez YR, Antonialli-Junior WF. 2016. Action of ants on vertebrate carcasses and blow flies (Calliphoridae).Journal of Medical Entomology53: 1283–1291. Google Scholar

  31. Pizarro LC, McCreery HF, Lawson SP, Winston ME, O'Donnell S. 2012. Sodiumspecific foraging by leafcutter ant workers (Atta cephalotes, Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Ecological Entomology37: 435–438. Google Scholar

  32. Poulsen M, Fernández-Marín H, Currie CT, Boomsma JJ. 2009. Ephemeral windows of opportunity for horizontal transmission of fungal symbionts in leafcutting ants.Evolution63: 2235–2247. Google Scholar

  33. Quinlan RJ, Cherrett JM. 1979. The role of fungus in the diet of the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes (L.).Ecological Entomology4: 151–160. Google Scholar

  34. Reid F. 1997. A Field Guide to the Mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico.Oxford University Press, New York, USA. Google Scholar

  35. Santos-Junior LC, Saraiva JM, Silvestre R, Antonialli-Junior WF. 2014. Evaluation of insects that exploit temporary protein resources emphasizing the action of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in a Neotropical semi-deciduous forest.Sociobiology61: 43–51. Google Scholar

  36. Thawley CJ, Langkilde T. 2016. Invasive fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) predation on eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus) eggs.Journal of Herpetology50: 284–288. Google Scholar

  37. Wetterer JK, Moore JA. 2005. Red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) at gopher tortoise (Testudines: Testudinidae) burrows.Florida Entomologist88: 349–354. Google Scholar

  38. Wojcik DP, Allen CR, Brenner RJ, Forys EA, Jouvenaz DP, Lutz RS. 2001. Red imported fire ants: impact on biodiversity.American Entomologist47: 16–23. Google Scholar

Jean-Paul Lachaud, Jonathan Pérez-Flores, and Gabriela Pérez-Lachaud "Opportunistic Predation by Leaf-Cutting Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on a Wounded Baird's Tapir (Mammalia: Perissodactyla: Tapiridae) in Mexico," Florida Entomologist 102(1), 251-253, (11 April 2019). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.102.0145
Published: 11 April 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE
3 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top