Open Access
17 December 2021 Cuticular Hydrocarbons of Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) as Influenced by Extraction Method, Natal Host, and Age
Luis Alexis Caravantes-Villatoro, Samuel Cruz-Esteban, Julio C. Rojas
Author Affiliations +

The primary function of cuticular hydrocarbons is to keep insects from losing water. However, cuticular hydrocarbons also may mediate chemical communication in a number of species. In this study, we investigated the effect of the extraction method, natal host, and age (maturation) on the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of the West Indian fruit fly, Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Cuticular hydrocarbons from female and male adults of different natal hosts (Mangifera indica L. or Spondias mombin L. [both Anacardiaceae]) and age were extracted by solvent extraction and direct contact solid-phase microextraction. Cuticular hydrocarbons were identified by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. In total, we recorded 12 compounds, but only 9 of them were identified. The identified cuticular hydrocarbons were linear alkanes (n-heneicosane, n-nonacosane, and n-hentriacontane), alkenes (n-heneicosene, n-tricosene, n-nonacosene, and n-hentriacontene), and branched alkanes (2-methyl-octacosane and 2-methyl-triacontane). There were no qualitative differences between sampling techniques. The solvent extraction method extracted more cuticular hydrocarbons from flies reared on mango compared to those extracted from flies reared on hog plum. In contrast, solid-phase microextraction extracted a higher concentration of cuticular hydrocarbons from flies reared on hog plum than to those extracted from flies reared on mango. Higher levels of 2-methyl-octacosane and 2-methyl-triacontane were detected with solvent extraction than with solid-phase microextraction; the opposite occurred with hentriacontane and unknown compound 2. The compounds n-heneicosene, n-heneicosane, and n-tricosene were present in mature males but not in mature females; n-nonacosene was found only in the mature flies of both sexes.

Insect cuticular lipids consist of hydrocarbons, fatty acids, alcohols, esters, aldehydes, and ketones (Blomquist et al. 1987). Among cuticular lipids, hydrocarbons have received considerable attention because they are the most abundant compounds on the cuticular surface of insects, they are easy to extract, and there are standardized techniques to study them (Nation 2002). Cuticular hydrocarbons usually are found as complex mixtures of a saturated linear chain (n-alkanes), unsaturated (n-alkenes), and methyl branched (r-alkanes) components. In insects, a primary function of cuticular hydrocarbons is to reduce the transpiration of water through the cuticle (Gibbs 1998), but they also have toxic or inhibitory effects on entomopathogens (Crespo et al. 2000; Ortiz-Urquiza & Keyhani 2013). Additionally, in some species, cuticular hydrocarbons serve as recognition signals between individuals from the same species or different species, including mimicry, reproductive division of labor in social insects, and courtship (Howard 1993; Blomquist & Bagnères 2010; Chung & Carroll 2015). Cuticular hydrocarbons have been studied principally in insects from Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Coleoptera (Blomquist & Bagnères 2010). For instance, studies have identified the cuticular hydrocarbons of larvae and adults from tephritid fruit flies, including species of the genera Ceratitis, Bactrocera, and Anastrepha (Carlson & Yocom 1986; Sutton & Carlson 1993; Vaníčková et al. 2014, 2015, 2017; Bosa et al. 2018). The principal objective of these studies was to identify the cuticular hydrocarbons as a tool for chemotaxonomical discrimination against the cryptic species (Carlson & Yocom 1986; Vaníčková et al. 2014, 2015, 2017). In contrast, relatively few studies have investigated the dynamic of these compounds in relation to abiotic and biotic factors (Sutton & Carlson 1993; Vaníčková et al. 2012; Bosa et al. 2018).

The West Indian fruit fly, Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae), is a Neotropical species distributed from Mexico to South America (Hernández-Ortiz 2007). This species is a generalist insect because it feeds on tropical fruits from different families, including species of economic importance such as mango (Mangifera indica L.), mombin (Spondias spp.) (both Anacardiaceae), carambola (Averrhoa carambola L.; Oxalidaceae), and occasionally guava (Psidium guajava L.; Myrtaceae) (Norrbom & Kim 1988; Toledo & Lara 1996; Birke et al. 2013). Under laboratory conditions, copulation occurs from 7 to 10 h when adults reach sexual maturity (7–8 d old). Females oviposit their eggs in the epidermis or mesocarp area of fruits. After hatching, larvae feed on the fruit pulp (Birke et al. 2013).

Here, we investigated whether cuticular hydrocarbon profiles are influenced by the extraction method, natal host, and age of A. obliqua. We sampled the cuticular hydrocarbons using solvent extraction and solid-phase microextraction; we identified cuticular hydrocarbons with gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. A previous study has identified the cuticular hydrocarbons of A. obliqua larvae (Sutton & Carlson 1993).

Materials and Methods


Infested fruits of mango (M. indica cv. ‘Coche’) and hog plum (Spondias mombin L.) were collected in the municipality of Tapachula (14.8577778°N, 92.2827778°W), Chiapas, Mexico. Mangoes and hog plums were collected in May and Sep, respectively. Fruits were transported to the laboratory and maintained at 26 to 27 °C, 75 ± 5% RH, and a photoperiod regimen of 12:12 h (L:D). When larvae reached the thirdinstar, they were deposited in plastic containers (8 cm H × 11 cm diam) with humid vermiculite as a substrate for pupation. About 2 d before the adult emergence, the pupae were separated from the vermiculite with a sieve (mesh 18) and were placed inside plexiglass cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm). Upon adult emergence, flies were separated by sex and kept at 26 to 27 °C, 75 ± 5% RH, and a photoperiod regimen of 12:12 h (L:D). Flies were fed ad libitum with a mixture of enzymatic yeast hydrolysate (MP Biomedical, Irvine, California, USA), sucrose (1:3), and water provided in tubes covered with cotton wicks. Female and male adults were separated according to their natal host plant (mango or hog plum), and age (immature or mature) for the experiment. Immature flies were 5 d old, while mature females were 17 d old. About 10 flies from each treatment were placed in glass vials (8.5 cm H × 2 cm diam). Flies were killed by freezing and maintained at –20 °C until the extraction of their cuticular hydrocarbons.


Cuticular hydrocarbons from the different treatments were extracted by 2 different sampling techniques. In the first technique, the cuticular hydrocarbons were sampled using solid-phase microextraction. A 100-µm polydimethylxylosane fiber (Supelco, Toluca, Mexico) was rubbed softly for 40 s on the principal parts of the fly body (head, thorax, wings, and abdomen). The fiber was first conditioned for 3 min at 250 °C in the injector of a gas chromatograph. The samples were desorbed for 1 min in the gas chromatograph injector for analysis. In total, 7 replicates were performed, with an individual considered as a replicate. In the second technique, cuticular hydrocarbons were sampled with solvent extraction. For each treatment, 3 flies were immersed in hexane for 5 min. Preliminary trials showed that using 1 or 2 flies was insufficient to extract the requisite amounts of cuticular hydrocarbons. The hexane extracts were concentrated at 100 µL under a gentle stream of nitrogen. One µL of these extracts were analyzed by gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer. The concentrated extracts were stored at –20 °C until analysis. In total, 6 replicates were performed for each treatment.


Cuticular hydrocarbons were analyzed using a Varian CP-3800 gas chromatograph coupled with a Varian Saturn 2200 mass spectrometer fitted with a Varian VF-5MS (30 m L × 0.25 mm ID) fused silica capillary column (Varian, Palo Alto, California, USA). All samples were analyzed in the splitless mode with the injector port at 250 °C. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow of 1 mL per min. The oven temperature was programmed at 150 °C for 2 min, increased at 10 °C per min to 300 °C, and maintained at this temperature for 12 min. The samples were ionized by electronic impact at 70 eV. The detected compounds were identified based on diagnostic ions and retention indices. To obtain the retention indices, an aliquot (1 µL) of an alkane standard solution (C12–C26) and synthetic standards (C28, C30, C32) were injected on the gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer. The relative abundance of a particular compound was calculated as the proportion of its area to all gas chromatograph peak areas combined.


The relative concentrations of the cuticular hydrocarbons were analyzed by a factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) with extraction method, natal host, age (maturation), and compound as independent variables. Original data were transformed using Box-Cox transformation in order to ensure normality and homoscedasticity of the data. Data also were analyzed by a multivariate analysis (MANOVA) with a canonical analysis, which reduces the dimensionality of the data and, by means of a 2-dimensional graph, shows the grouping patterns of each of the treatments studied. All analyses were performed using the statistical software R version 3.6.2 (R Core Team 2019).


In total, we found 12 compounds, but only 9 of them were identified. The identified compounds were linear alkanes (n-heneicosane, n-nonacosane, and n-hentriacontane), alkenes (n-heneicosene, n-tricosene, n-nonacosene, and n-hentriacontene), and branched alkanes (2-methyl-octacosane and 2-methyl-triacontane) (Fig. 1). Our results showed that n-heneicosene, n-heneicosane, and n-tricosene were present only in mature males (sex-specific), while n-nonacosene was found only in mature flies of both sexes (age-specific).

The factorial analysis showed that the relative concentrations of cuticular hydrocarbons of A. obliqua were affected by the extraction method, natal host, age, and compound (Table 1). Moreover, most of the first, second, and order interactions were significant, except method × host, method × age, and method × host × age (Table 1). The solvent extraction method extracted more cuticular hydrocarbons from flies reared on mango compared to those extracted from flies reared on hog plum. In contrast, solid-phase microextraction extracted a higher concentration of cuticular hydrocarbons from flies reared on hog plum than those extracted from flies reared on mango (Fig. 2A). The differences between the 2 extraction techniques with respect to the age of the flies were not apparent. However, immature flies had higher levels of cuticular hydrocarbons than mature flies; mature females had higher concentrations of cuticular hydrocarbons than mature males (Fig. 2B). The solvent extraction method performed better for most of the compounds, except with unknown 1, hentriacontane, and unknown 2, which were extracted more easily with the solid-phase microextraction technique (Fig. 2C). The natal host did not strongly influence the relative amount of cuticular hydrocarbons on the flies of different ages. However, immature flies, males, and females presented a higher relative amount of cuticular hydrocarbons compared to both sexes of mature flies (Fig. 2D). Unknown 3, unknown 2, hentriacontane, and 2-methyl-octacosane were the most abundant compounds, while n-hentriacontane, unknown 1, n-nonacosene, and 2-methyl-triacontene were the less abundant compounds, independent of the fly origin (Fig. 2E). The relative amounts of unknown 1, n-hentriacontane, and unknown 2 were similar in mature and immature flies. However, the relative amount of 2-methyl-triacontane and hentriacontane was higher in mature flies than in immature flies (Fig. 2F). The relative amounts of 2-methyl-octacosane, n-nonacosane, and unknown 3 were higher in immature flies than in mature flies. The relative amounts of unknown compound 3 was higher markedly in immature females, as opposed to its low relative amount in mature males.

Fig. 1.

Representative gas chromatograms of hexane extracts (A) and solid-phase microextraction (B) of Anastrepha obliqua males from mango and Spondias mombin, respectively. 1: n-heneicosene; 2: n-heneicosane; 3: n-tricosene; 4: 2-methyl-octacosane; 5: n-nonacosene; 6: n-nonacosane; 7: unknown compound 1; 8: 2-methyl-triacontane; 9: n-hentriacontene; 10: n-hentriacontane; 11: unknown compound 2; 12: unknown compound 3.


Table 1.

Factorial analysis of the effect of the extraction method, natal host, age (maturation), and identified compounds on the cuticular hydrocarbons of Anastrepha obliqua adults.


Fig. 2.

Interaction graph of the analysis of the cuticular compounds of Anastrepha obliqua with different extraction methods, natal host, and age. IM = immature male, IF = immature female, MM = mature male, MF = mature female. C4: 2-methyl-octacosane; C6: n-nonacosane; C7: unknown compound 1; C8: 2-methyl-triacontane; C9: n-hentriacontene; C10: n-hentriacontane; C11: unknown compound 2; C12: unknown compound 3.


The MANOVA analysis explained 83.6% of the total variability of the data, with 6 possible groups (Pillai: 3.55; F = 704; P < 0.001). The separations were influenced more by the extraction method and age, independent of sex (Fig. 3). The largest group was found in the 2 left quadrants. This group was influenced highly by 2-methyl-oc-tacosane, n-nonacosane, n-hentriacontane, and unknown 3, which were extracted at a high level in immature flies. Under that same group (lower left quadrant of Fig. 3), there was a group formed by treatments of immature flies, whose cuticular hydrocarbons were extracted with solid-phase microextraction. This subgroup was influenced highly by unknown 1 (Fig. 3). In the upper right quadrant of Figure 3, there is a group composed of the hexane, mango mature female treatment. This group was influenced by 2-methyl-octa-cosane and 2-methyl-triacontene; both compounds were extracted mostly with hexane. The other group, in the same quadrant of Figure 3, was influenced highly by 2-methyl-triacontene. This group was made up of cuticular hydrocarbons of mature flies extracted with hexane. The last group was influenced by unknown 2 and n-hentriacontene, and it was composed of treatments of mature flies. These compounds mostly were extracted by solid-phase microextraction (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Canonical discriminant analysis plot of the association between the cuticular compounds of Anastrepha obliqua with different extraction methods, natal host, and age. C4: 2-methyl-octacosane; C6: n-nonacosane; C7: unkown compound 1; C8: 2-methyl-triacontane; C9: n-hentriacontene; C10: 10, n-hentriacontane; C11: unknown compound 2; C12: unknown compound 3. HMIF = hexane, mango, immature female; HMIM = hexane, mango, immature male; HMMF = hexane, mango mature female; HMMM = hexane, mango mature male; SMIF = solid-phase microextraction, mango, immature female; SMIM = solid-phase microextraction, mango, immature male; SMMF = solid-phase microextraction, mango, mature female; SMMM = solid-phase microextraction, mango, mature male; HHPIF = hexane, hog plum, immature female; HHPIM = hexane, hog plum, immature male; HHPMM = hexane, hog plum, mature female; HHPMM = hexane, hog plum, mature male; SHPIF = solid-phase microextraction, hog plum, immature female; SHPIM = solid-phase microextraction, hog plum, immature male; SHPMF = solid-phase microextraction, hog plum, mature female; SHPMM = solid-phase, hog plum, mature male.


The correlation matrix showed a positive relationship between 2-methyl-octacosane and n-nonacosane, n-nonacosene, and n-hentriacontene, and unknown 1 and n-hentriacontane. In Figure 3, the vectors of these compounds are close to each other. A negative correlation also was found between 2-methyl-octacosane and n-hentriacontene, 2-methyl-octacosane and unknown 2, and 2-methyl-triac-ontane and unknown 2. In Figure 3, the vectors of these compounds are in opposite directions.


In this study, using 2 extraction techniques, we identified the cuticular hydrocarbons of female and male A. obliqua. Traditionally, insect cuticular hydrocarbons have been extracted by rinsing whole specimens in pentane, hexane, or heptane (Carlson & Service 1979; Haverty et al. 1996). One of the issues with solvent extraction is that non-cuticular hydrocarbons can be extracted either from the cuticle or from the internal organs. The extraction of non-cuticular hydrocarbons may be minimized by reducing the extraction time (Haverty et al. 1996), although this may affect the amount of cuticular hydrocarbons extracted (Drijfhout et al. 2009). The sole extraction of cuticular hydrocarbons is crucial when the study aims to determine what compounds are involved in insect communication. The solid-phase microextraction technique also has been used to extract cuticular hydrocarbons from insects (Moneti et al. 1997). It has been suggested that hydrocarbon profiles obtained from solid-phase microextraction samples are more characteristic of the insect's cuticular compounds compared with solvent extraction (Ginzel et al. 2003; Kather & Martin 2012). One of the advantages of the solid-phase microextraction is that model insects are not killed and can be used for further assays (Monnin et al. 1998; Everaerts et al. 2010; Ginzel 2010); however, solid-phase microextraction has some disadvantages, including high cost and fragility of fibers (Turillazzi et al. 1998). Some authors suggest corroborating the hydrocarbon profiles with solvent extractions because solid-phase microextraction is a non-exhaustive extraction technique (De Pasquele et al. 2005, 2007).

In our study, solvent extraction and solid-phase microextraction extracted the same compounds, although there were quantitative differences in the relative amounts of the extracted cuticular hydrocarbons. In this manner, the solvent extraction technique extracted a higher amount of 2-methyl-octacosane and 2-methyl-triacontane than when solid-phase microextraction was used. The opposite was found with n-hentriacontene and unknown compound 2. The quantitative differences observed between the techniques might be explained by several reasons. For instance, the solid-phase microextraction fiber contacted only the thorax, abdomen, and wings of flies, whereas the entire fly was submerged in hexane. Also, the number of individuals and the sampling time were different for each technique. Thus, the solid-phase microextraction technique extracted only the superficial cuticular hydrocarbons from specific parts of the body, whereas the solvent extraction technique can extract cuticular hydrocarbons from external and internal parts of the whole body. It is possible that cuticular hydrocarbons were extracted in greater amounts by the solid-phase microextraction technique because it is more abundant in the body surface. In general, our results agree with other published studies that have evaluated the performance of both techniques in the extraction of cuticular hydrocarbons in a number of insect orders (Moneti et al. 1997; Roux et al. 2002; Bland et al. 2003; Geiselhardt et al. 2009; Everaerts et al. 2010). For example, Moneti et al. (1997) found that cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of the social wasps Vespa crabro L., Vespa orientalis F., and Polistes dominulus (Christ) (all Hymenoptera: Vespidae) were qualitatively similar when extracted with hexane and solid-phase microextraction; however, they reported that greater amounts of high-molecular-weight hydrocarbons of V. crabro were extracted with solid-phase microextraction compared to the solvent extraction technique. The cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Nauphoeta cinerea (Olivier) (Blattodea: Blaberidae) dominant and subordinate males did not differ qualitatively using solid-phase microextraction and pentane extraction (Roux et al. 2002). The cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of cockroach males were dissimilar between solid-phase microextraction and solvent extraction regarding the ratio of some compounds (Roux et al. 2002). In contrast, Ferreira-Caliman et al. (2012) found qualitative and quantitative differences in the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Melipona marginata Lepeletier and Apis mellifera L. (both Hymenop-tea: Apidae) workers when sampled with hexane and solid-phase microextraction.

The cuticular hydrocarbons found in A. obliqua have been reported in a number of insect species (Lockey 1976; Page et al. 1997; Ferreira-Caliman et al. 2012; Curtis et al. 2013). For instance, n-heneicosane, n-tricosene, n-nonacosene, n-nonacosane, n-hentriacontene, and n-hentriacontane have been found in A. mellifera workers (Ferreira-Caliman et al. 2012). Compounds 2-methyl-octacosane and 2-methyl-tricontane have been reported to be present in the epicuticle of both sexes of Drosophila subquinaria Spencer and Drosophila recens Wheeler (both Diptera: Drosophilidae) (Curtis et al. 2013). Interestingly, we found a low number of cuticular hydrocarbons in A. obliqua compared to those reported for other tephritid fruit flies (Vaníčková et al. 2012, 2014, 2015). For instance, almost 60 cuticular hydrocarbons were reported on the body surfaces of 4 species of Ceratitis (Diptera: Tephritidae), consisting of straight-chained and methyl-branched alkanes, alkenes, alkadienes, and alkatrienes (Vaníčková et al. 2014). A total of 69 cuticular hydrocarbons were identified in the epicuticle of Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) species complex, including 15 n-alkanes (C11–C29), 28 monomethyl alkanes, 17 alkenes, 7 alkadienes, and 1 alkatriene (Vaníčková et al. 2015). In contrast, a recent study showed that cuticular hydrocarbon profiles from wild and mass-reared Anastrepha ludens Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae) males contained 2 n-alkanes, 5 monomethyl alkanes, and 2 alkanes (Bosa et al. 2018). The cuticular hydrocarbon profile of A. obliqua more closely resembles that of A. ludens than A. fraterculus. Anastrepha ludens, A. obliqua, and A. fraterculus belong to the A. fraterculus species group; therefore, the difference in the number of cuticular hydrocarbons among these 3 species is noteworthy. However, interspecies relationships among the A. fraterculus group are not yet resolved; this group is composed of 8 taxonomically recognized morphotypes (Hernández-Ortiz et al. 2012, 2015).

Intrinsic and extrinsic factors can affect the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of insects. In our case, we found that the natal host, age, and sex qualitatively and quantitatively affected the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of wild A. obliqua adults. Previously, studies have shown that diet significantly influences the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in insects (Francis et al. 1989; Stennett & Etges 1997; Liang & Silverman 2000). In the only study carried out so far that investigated the effect of the natal host on the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles with a species of Tephritidae, Carlson and Yocom (1986) reported a quantitative variation in the profile of A. ludens adults reared from loquat, guava, cattley guava, and laboratory diet. Stennett and Etges (1997) found that the cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila mojavensis Patterson and Drosophila arizonae Ruiz and Wasserman (both Diptera: Drosophilidae) varied qualitatively and quantitatively, depending on whether they were reared on fermenting agria or organ pipe cactus tissues and laboratory food. Furthermore, Stennett and Etges (1997) reported that the abundance of C29-branched alkanes was greater in flies reared on pipe cactus than those reared on agria or laboratory food. A recent study with A. obliqua has shown that the natal host can affect the qualitative and quantitative profile of volatile compounds emitted by calling males (Aluja et al. 2020). For instance, males reared on P. guajava, an occasional host of A. obliqua, released 8 compounds, while males reared on S. mombin, the ancestral host of A. obliqua, emitted only 4 compounds.

Besides the quantitative differences observed in the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of A. obliqua, we found that n-nonacosene is a compound that appears only in older flies of both sexes. Vaníčková et al. (2012) reported quantitative age-dependent dynamics in the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of A. fraterculus adults. Young females and males have a similar cuticular composition. However, the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of both sexes began to deviate from d 7 after eclosion; the profiles were different between sexes in older flies (20–30 d after eclosion). In A. ludens, 2-methyl-hexacosane, n-nonacosene, and 2-methyl-triacontane varied significantly among wild males of different ages (Bosa et al. 2018). Total hydrocarbon abundance of D. mojavensis changed from eclosion to 14 to 18 d, past the age at sexual maturity, and then decreased in older flies (Etges & de Oliveira 2014). The abundance of most saturated hydrocarbons and methyl-branched hydrocarbons decreased in 4 to 6 d old Drosophila melanogaster Meigen (Diptera: Drosophilidae) males; in females, most short-chain hydrocarbons decreased but (Z)-5-pentacosene and 2-methyl-octacosane increased with age (Everaerts et al. 2010).

We noted also that n-heneicosene, n-heneicosane, and n-tricosene were present only in older A. obliqua males. A similar observation was observed in A. fraterculus (Vaníčková et al. 2012), where it was reported that the cuticle of mature males had a series of 7-monoenes, including 7-henicosene, 7-docosene, 7-tricosene, 7-pentacosene, and 7-tritriacontene, which were absent in mature females. Our results and those of Vaníčková et al. (2012) suggest that these cuticular hydrocarbons may have a sexual function, possibly playing a role as a contact sex pheromone. However, to our knowledge, it is unknown whether contact chemical signals play a role in the courtship and mating in a tephritid fruit fly species. Cuticular hydrocarbons can play a significant role in the courtship and mating of Diptera species (Ferveur & Cobb 2010). For instance, chemical and behavioral analyses showed that a fraction of 4 monoenes mediated the courtship behavior of Drosophila virilis Sturtevant (Diptera: Drosophilidae); however, only (Z)-11-pentacosene evoked all courtship acts of this species (Oguma et al. 1992). The male copulatory response of Glossina austeni (Newstead) (Diptera: Glossinidae) is evoked by a blend of 5 alkenes present on the cuticle of conspecific females (Carlson et al. 2005). In contrast, 9-tricosene, 7-tricosene, 5-tricosene, and tricosane adversely regulated courtship and mating of Drosophila suzukii Matsumura (Diptera: Drosophilidae), although all of these hydrocarbons were present in sexually mature flies (Snellings et al. 2018).

In summary, our results showed that the extraction technique, natal host, age, and sex affected the cuticular hydrocarbons of A. obliqua. Remarkably, we found that n-nonacosene is an age-specific compound because it appears only in mature females and males. Our results also showed that n-heneicosene, n-heneicosane, and n-tricosene are present in mature males but not in mature females. Further behavioral assays are needed to confirm any possible involvement of these compounds in the sexual behavior of A. obliqua.


We thank Jorge Toledo and Azucena Oropeza for providing biological material used in the cuticular extractions, and Leopoldo Cruz-López and Antonio Santiesteban for their valuable assistance in identifying the compounds.

References Cited


Aluja M, Cabagne G, Altúzar-Molina A, Pascacio-Villafán C, Enciso E, Guillén L. 2020. Host plant and antibiotic effects on scent bouquet composition of Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua calling males, two polyphagous tephritid pests. Insects 11: 309. Google Scholar


Birke A, Guillén L, Midgarden D, Aluja M. 2013. Fruit flies, Anastrepha ludens (Loew), A. obliqua (Macquart) and A. grandis (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae): three pestiferous tropical fruit flies that could potentially expand their range to temperate areas, pp. 192–213 In Peña JE [ed.], Potential Invasive Pests. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. Google Scholar


Bland JM, Osbrink WL, Cornelius ML, Lax AR, Craig V. 2003. Detection of termite cuticular hydrocarbons by solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Sociobiology 41: 91–104. Google Scholar


Blomquist GJ, Bagnères AG. 2010. Insect Hydrocarbons. Biology, Biochemistry and Chemical Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar


Blomquist GJ, Nelson D, De Renobales M. 1987. Chemistry, biochemistry and physiology of insect cuticular lipids. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 6: 227–265. Google Scholar


Bosa CF, Cruz-López L, Guillén-Navarro K, Zepeda-Cisneros CS, Liedo P. 2018. Variation in the cuticular hydrocarbons of the Mexican fruit fly Anastrepha ludens males between strains and age classes. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 99: e21513. Google Scholar


Carlson DA, Service MW. 1979. Differentiation between species of the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex (Diptera: Culicidae) by analysis of cuticular hydrocarbons. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 73: 589–592. Google Scholar


Carlson DA, Yocom SR. 1986. Cuticular hydrocarbons from six species of tephritid fruit flies. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 3: 397–412. Google Scholar


Carlson DA, Mramba F, Sutton BD, Bernier UR, Geden CJ. 2005. Sex pheromone of the tsetse species, Glossina austeni: isolation and identification of natural hydrocarbons, and bioassay of synthesized compounds. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 19: 470–479. Google Scholar


Chung H, Carroll SB. 2015. Wax, sex and the origin of species: dual roles of insect cuticular hydrocarbons in adaptation and mating. BioEssays 37: 822–830. Google Scholar


Crespo R, Juárez MP, Cafferata LF. 2000. Biochemical interaction between entomopathogenous fungi and their insect-host-like hydrocarbons. Mycology 92: 528–536. Google Scholar


Curtis S, Sztepanacz JL, White BE, Dyer KA, Rundle HD, Mayer P. 2013. Epicuticular compounds of Drosophila subquinaria and D. recens: identification, quantification, and their role in female mate choice. Journal of Chemical Ecology 39: 579–590. Google Scholar


De Pasquale C, Jones A, Charlton A, Alonzo G. 2005. Use of SPME extraction to determine organophosphorus pesticides adsorption phenomena in water and soil matrices. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 85: 1101–1115. Google Scholar


De Pasquale C, Guarino S, Peri E, Alonzo G, Colazza S. 2007. Investigation of cuticular hydrocarbons from Bagrada hilaris genders by SPME/GC-MS. Analytical Bioanalytical Chemistry 389: 1259–1265. Google Scholar


Drijfhout F, Martin S, Kather R. 2009. The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in insects, pp. 91–114 In Zang W, Liu H [eds.], Behavioral and Chemical Ecology. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, New York, USA. Google Scholar


Etges WJ, de Oliveira CC. 2014. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. X. Age-specific dynamics of adult epicuticular hydrocarbon expression in response to different host plants. Ecology and Evolution 4: 2033–2045. Google Scholar


Everaerts C, Farine JP, Cobb M, Ferveur JF. 2010. Drosophila cuticular hydrocarbons revisited: mating status alters cuticular profiles. PloS One 5: e9607. Google Scholar


Francis BR, Blanton WE, Littlefield JL, Nunamaker RA. 1989. Hydrocarbons of the cuticle and hemolymph of the adult honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of Entomological Society of America 82: 486–494. Google Scholar


Ferreira-Caliman MJ, Turatti ICC, Lopes NP, Zucchi R, Nascimento FS. 2012. Analysis of insect cuticular compounds by non-lethal solid phase micro extraction with styrene-divinylbenzene copolymers. Journal Chemical of Ecology 38: 418–426. Google Scholar


Ferveur JF, Cobb M. 2010. Behavioral and evolutionary roles of cuticular hydrocarbons in Diptera, pp. 325–343 In Blomquist GJ, Bagnères AG [eds.], Insect Hydrocarbons. Biology, Biochemistry and Chemical Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar


Geiselhardt S, Otte T, Hilker M. 2009. The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in male mating behavior of the mustard leaf beetle, Phaedon cochleariae (F.). Journal of Chemical Ecology 35: 1162–1171. Google Scholar


Gibbs AG. 1998. Water-proofing properties of cuticular lipids. American Zoologist 38: 471–482. Google Scholar


Ginzel MD. 2010. Hydrocarbons as contact pheromones of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), pp. 375–389 In Blomquist GJ, Bagnères AG [eds.], Insect Hydrocarbons. Biology, Biochemistry and Chemical Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar


Ginzel MD, Blomquist GJ, Millar JG, Hanks LM. 2003. Role of contact pheromones in mate recognition in Xylotrechus colonus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 533–545. Google Scholar


Haverty MI, Grace JK, Nelson LJ, Yamamoto RT. 1996. Intercaste, intercolony, and temporal variation in cuticular hydrocarbons of Copotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 22: 1813–1834. Google Scholar


Hernández-Ortiz V. 2007. Diversidad y biogeografía del género Anastrepha en México, pp. 53–76 In Hernández-Ortiz V [ed.], Moscas de la Fruta en Latinoamérica (Diptera: Tephritidae): Diversidad, Biología y Manejo. S y G Editores, Distrito Federal, Mexico. Google Scholar


Hernández-Ortiz V, Bartolucci AF, Morales-Valles P, Frías D, Selivon D. 2012. Cryptic species of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex (Diptera: Tephritidae): a multivariate approach for the recognition of South American morphotypes. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 105: 305–318. Google Scholar


Hernández-Ortiz V, Canal NA, Trigero Salas JO, Ruíz-Hurtado FM, Duzul-Cauich D. 2015. Taxonomy and phenotypic relationships of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex in the Mesoamerican and Pacific Neotropical dominions (Diptera, Tephritidae). ZooKeys 540: 95–124. Google Scholar


Howard R. 1993. Cuticular hydrocarbons and chemical communication, pp. 179–226 In Stanley-Samuelson D, Nelson D [eds. ], Insect Lipids: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biology. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA. Google Scholar


Kather R, Martin SJ. 2012. Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles as a taxonomic tool: advantages, limitations and technical aspects. Physiological Entomology 37: 25–32. Google Scholar


Liang D, Silverman J. 2000. “You are what you eat”: diet modifies cuticular hydrocarbons and nestmate recognition in the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Naturwissenschaften 87: 412–416. Google Scholar


Lockey KH. 1976. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Locusta, Schistocerca, and Periplaneta, and their role in waterproofing. Insect Biochemistry 6: 457–472. Google Scholar


Nation J. 2002. Insect Physiology and Biochemistry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. Google Scholar


Moneti G, Dani F, Pieraccini G. 1997. Solid-phase microextraction of insect epicuticular hydrocarbons for gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analysis. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 11: 857–862. Google Scholar


Monnin T, Malosse C, Peeters C. 1998. Solid-phase microextraction and cuticular hydrocarbon differences related to reproductive activity in queenless ant Dinoponera quadriceps. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24: 473–490. Google Scholar


Norrbom AL, Kim KC. 1988. A list of the reported host plants of the species of Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae). USDA-APHIS-PPQ Publication #81-52. US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Washington, DC, USA. Google Scholar


Oguma Y, Nemoto T, Kuwahara Y. 1992. (Z)-11-Pentacosene is the major sex pheromone component in Drosophila virilis (Diptera). Chemoecology 3: 60–64. Google Scholar


Ortiz-Urquiza A, Keyhani NO. 2013. Action on the surface: entomopathogenic fungi versus the insect cuticle. Insects 4: 357–374. Google Scholar


Page M, Nelson LJ, Blomquist GJ, Seybold SJ. 1997. Cuticular hydrocarbons as chemotaxonomic characters of pine engraver beetles (Ips spp.) in the grandicollis subgeneric group. Journal of Chemical Ecology 23: 1053–1099. Google Scholar


R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.  Google Scholar


Roux E, Sreng L, Provost E, Roux M, Clement JL. 2002. Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of dominant versus subordinate male Nauphoeta cinerea cockroaches. Journal of Chemical Ecology 28: 1221–1235. Google Scholar


Toledo J, Lara JR. 1996. Comparison in the biology of Anastrepha obliqua reared in mango and in mombin, pp. 359–362 In McPherson BA, Steck GJ [eds], Fruit Fly Pests: A World Assessment of their Biology and Management. St. Lucie Press, Sand Key, Florida, USA. Google Scholar


Snellings Y, Herrera B, Wildemann B, Beelen M, Zwarts L, Wenseelers T, Callaerts P. 2018. The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in mate recognition in Drosophila suzukii. Scientific Reports 8: 4996. Google Scholar


Stennett MD, Etges WJ. 1997. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. III. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation is determined by use of different host plants in Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 23: 2803–2824. Google Scholar


Sutton BD, Carlson DA. 1993. Interspecific variation in tephritid fruit fly larvae surface hydrocarbons. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 23: 53–65. Google Scholar


Turillazzi S, Sledge MF, Moneti G. 1998. Use of a simple method for sampling cuticular hydrocarbons from live social wasps. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution 10: 293–297. Google Scholar


Vaníčková L, Svatoš J, Kroiss J, Kaltenpoth M, Do Nascimiento RR, Hoskovec M, Břízová R, Kalinová B. 2012. Cuticular hydrocarbons of the South American fruit fly Anastrepha fraterculus: variability with sex and age. Journal of Chemical Ecology 38: 1133–1142. Google Scholar


Vaníčková L, Virgilio M, Tomčala A, Břízová R, Ekezi S, Hoskovec M, Kalinová B, Do Nascimiento RR, De Meyer M. 2014. Resolution of three cryptic agricultural pests (Ceratitis fasciventris, C. anonae, C. rosa, Diptera: Tephritidae) using cuticular hydrocarbon profiling. Bulletin of Entomological Research 104: 631–638. Google Scholar


Vaníčková L, Břízová R, Mendonça AL, Pompeiano A, Do Nascimiento RR. 2015. Intraspecific variation of cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in the Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) species complex. Journal of Applied Entomology 139: 679–689. Google Scholar


Vaníčková L, Nagy R, Pompeiano A, Kalinová B. 2017. Epicuticular chemistry reinforces the new taxonomic classification of the Bactrocera dorsalis species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae, Dacinae). PLoS One 12: e0184102. Google Scholar
Luis Alexis Caravantes-Villatoro, Samuel Cruz-Esteban, and Julio C. Rojas "Cuticular Hydrocarbons of Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) as Influenced by Extraction Method, Natal Host, and Age," Florida Entomologist 104(4), 289-296, (17 December 2021).
Published: 17 December 2021
cromatografía de gases-espectrometría de masas
extracción con disolvente
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica
microextracción en fase salida
mosca de la fruta de las Indias Occidentales
Back to Top