Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2003 RELATIVE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE AND CROWDING ON WING POLYMORPHISM IN THE SOUTHERN GROUND CRICKET, ALLONEMOBIUS SOCIUS (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLIDAE)
Alexander E. Olvido, Elizabeth S. Elvington, Timothy A. Mousseau
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Many factors determine the formation of flight wings in wing-polymorphic insects. Earlier studies on a cricket (Gryllus firmus) population producing spring and summer generations showed a declining frequency of macropterous, or long-winged, adults towards the end of a growing season. Numerous confounding factors can explain this seasonal decline, one of which is increasing mortality rates of juveniles that may otherwise emerge as macropterous adults. To test this hypothesis, we measured rates of juvenile mortality and adult macroptery in Allonemobius socius Scudder (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), an organism with a seasonal phenology similar to that of G. firmus. After rearing A. socius juveniles exclusively under “spring” versus “summer” conditions and at different population densities, we found that crickets reared in groups under “summer” conditions tended to emerge as macropters, with females being more likely than males to emerge long-winged. Juvenile mortality did not adequately explain the emergence pattern of macropters. Surprisingly, variation among families accounted for <1% of total variation in frequency of long-winged adults. Thus, seasonal climate, followed by population density, and then their interaction with each other appear to be the three major determinants of wing morph frequencies in A. socius. We discuss the possible adaptive significance of wing polymorphism in insects with respect to habitat persistence and mating success.

The independent evolution of wings among several animal taxa (Kingsolver & Koehl 1994) is due, in part, to the apparent benefits of flight. Flight-capable organisms can easily colonize peripheral areas of their current habitat, as well as migrate to more distant and, perhaps, novel environments in search of food and mates. By enhancing mobility and dispersal, flight undoubtedly contributed to the remarkable diversification of insects (Roff & Fairbairn 1991; Rankin & Burchsted 1992; Kingsolver & Koehl 1994).

Developing and maintaining the flight apparatus, however, often carries a cost. For example, long-winged (or macropterous) females of the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus, reach reproductive age at a later date and have lower lifetime fecundities when compared to their short-winged counterparts (Roff 1990a). In the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, macroptery is associated with longer egg-to-adult development time and lowered male mating success (Novotny 1995). Such trade-offs between flight wings and other traits closely associated with fitness allows one to view flight ability as itself a fitness-determining trait along the same lines as growth rate and fecundity. Thus, not only is wing polymorphism interesting for its own sake, but also for its apparent ties to life history and life cycle evolution (Roff & Fairbairn 1991; Rankin & Burchsted 1992; Kingsolver & Koehl 1994; reviewed extensively in Dingle 1996).

Apart from being genetically determined (Masaki & Walker 1987; Mousseau & Roff 1989; Roff 1990a; Roff 1990b), flight wings can develop in response to numerous environmental factors. For example, warm temperatures and long-day conditions typical of summer tend to produce macropterous adults, e.g., in crickets and grasshoppers (Tanaka 1978; see also Masaki & Walker [1987], and references therein) and in Gerris species (Vepsäläinen 1978, in Dingle 1996). Conditions of crowding and food shortage also contribute to variation in the frequency of wing morphs in insect populations (Tauber et al. 1986; Walker 1987).

In their exhaustive survey of one population of the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus, Veazey et al. (1978) found that the frequency of macropterous adults caught in pitfall traps was lower in the summer than in the spring brood. However, such a pattern can be attributed to a number of confounding and interacting variables, including: (1) migration of flight-capable, macropterous adults away from the sampling site; (2) differential mortality of presumptive macropters and micropters, due perhaps to intraspecific competition for food or space; (3) increased predation by insectivores maturing later in the growing season; (4) shedding of flight wings by individuals that emerged earlier in the season as macropterous adults (though this phenomenon has not been reported for G. firmus); (5) a genetically fixed seasonal phenology for macropters and micropters, e.g. macropterous adults from only the spring brood always producing offspring that always emerge a year later (in the following spring) as long-winged adults; (6) the emergence of 2nd-generation, or summer brood, juveniles as short-winged rather than macropterous adults; and (7) a deficiency in the sampling methods used by Veazey et al. (1978). Investigations since then have elaborated some of the genetic and physiological mechanisms that contribute to variation in G. firmus wing morph frequencies (Roff 1990a; Roff 1990b; Zera et al. 1998). But surprisingly, very little empirical work has been done to tease out which ecological factors are most responsible for this pattern of naturally occurring wing polymorphism (cf. Roff 1994a; Crnokrak & Roff 1998).

The current study addresses the hypothesis that differential juvenile mortality explains variation in wing morph frequency in wing polymorphic insects (see Factor 2 above). Both spring and summer broods of the southern ground cricket, Allonemobius socius Scudder (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), occur at high densities throughout the southeastern region of North America, and experience a variety of seasonal temperatures and day-lengths associated with their widespread latitudinal and altitudinal distribution (Howard & Furth 1986; Mousseau & Roff 1989). Moreover, like G. firmus, both field and laboratory populations of A. socius produce a mixture of short- and long-winged adults, with the latter form also exhibiting variation in flight propensity (A.E.O., personal observation). Thus, A. socius is useful for investigating the genetic and environmental factors responsible for variation in wing morph frequencies in natural insect populations.

Materials and Methods

Cricket Stocks

All individuals used in this experiment were first-generation, laboratory-reared descendents of crickets caught as juveniles from a wet, grassy field adjacent to a greenhouse on the University of South Carolina--Columbia. Before the start of the experiment, all crickets and their eggs were incubated, reared, and maintained under conditions simulating a hot, summer day (31°C, 15 h day-length, >60% relative humidity) in Columbia, South Carolina, U.S.A. (Wood 1996). Voucher specimens have been sent to J. C. Morse of the Clemson University Arthropod Collection.

Experimental Design

Individually reared juveniles from 23 full-sibling families were housed in clear plastic petri plates (diameter = 100 mm) each provisioned ad libitum with pulverized cat chow, chopped carrots, water, and shredded unbleached paper towels for cover. Group-reared juveniles from 31 full-sibling families were housed in 9 × 9 × 8 cm clear plastic cages that were similarly provisioned. Left-over cat chow and carrots were changed every 2 to 3 days.

We used a double split-brood design, in which one-half of a cohort of newly hatched juveniles from each family was randomly assigned to a “summer” (31°C, 15 h day-length) rearing environment, while the other half was reared in a “spring” (24°C, 11 h day-length) environment. Within a seasonal environment, group-reared juveniles were then assigned to either a high population density (14 to 21 juveniles per cage) or low population density (3 to 6 juveniles per cage) treatment. Among-family variation in maternal fecundity, egg-hatching rate, and juvenile survivorship precluded assignment of exactly equal numbers of individuals to replicate cages (in each population-density treatment). Because A. socius will consume dead conspecifics when available, we minimized scavenging by removing dead individuals without replacement. All surviving juveniles were reared to adulthood exclusively in the environment to which they were initially assigned.

Scoring Macroptery and Juvenile Survivorship

Only macropterous adults possess the ivory-colored flight wings that extend from beneath the beige-black tegmina, or outer wings (Fig. 1). We scored adults <3 d after the final molt as macropterous if they emerged with flight wings intact. In group-reared crickets, incidence of macroptery was then calculated as the number of macropterous adults divided by the total number of adults from a given replicate cage. Similarly, incidence of macroptery in crickets reared in isolation was calculated as the number of macropterous adults divided by the total number of adults that were reared in petri plates within a given seasonal environment.

Juvenile survivorship of group-reared crickets was calculated as the number of emerging adults (regardless of wing morph) divided by the total number of nymphs from a given replicate cage. Similarly, juvenile survivorship for crickets reared in isolation was calculated as the total number of petri plates that yielded (long- or short-winged) adults divided by the original number of petri plates used to rear cricket nymphs individually.

Statistical Analyses

Because the macroptery data did not satisfy the normality assumptions for valid parametric analyses, we turned to a nonparametric, van der Waerden normal scores analysis to test for sex-specific differences in proportion of macropters for each treatment. We performed the NPAR1WAY procedure in SAS For Windows, Version 6.12 (SAS 1989). As discussed fully in Conover (1999), a van der Waerden analysis achieves asymptotic relative efficiency, or A.R.E. (∼statistical power), comparable to that of parametric statistical tests, e.g., F-test, when data satisfy normality assumptions, and greater A.R.E. when data are non-normal. We adjusted the resulting probability values using the sequential Bonferroni method in order to maintain an experiment-wide Type I error rate of ≤5% for all pairwise comparisons (Rice 1989).

We partitioned total variance in both the frequency of macropters and juvenile survivorship via the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method available in the VARCOMP procedure of SAS for Windows 6.12 (SAS 1989). Although the VARCOMP procedure does not provide P-values for estimated variance components, it allows a quantitative description of importance of each biotic and abiotic factor to observed macroptery patterns in A. socius. The choice of REML as a method for estimating variances is justified by its common use in modern quantitative genetic studies, e.g., Shaw (1987), Meyer and Hill (1991), and Ferreira et al. (1999).

Results

Compared to the spring rearing treatment, the summer rearing environment tended to produce a higher proportion of long-winged adults (Fig. 2). Differences in macroptery rates between the sexes appeared only at high population densities (Table 1), with more females than males emerging as long-winged adults (Fig. 2).

The largest contributing factor to variance in macroptery rates was juvenile rearing climate, followed by the interaction of rearing season with population density (Table 2). Family origin (nested within population density since not all of the families were represented in the population-density manipulations) contributed <1% to variance in macroptery rates (Table 2).

Juvenile survivorship was high across all rearing treatments. As expected, crickets reared in isolation had higher survival rates (∼85% in both spring and summer rearing environments) than those reared in groups, with high population densities resulting in the lowest survival rates (between 58-78%). At a given population density, juvenile survival rates were similar for both summer and spring rearing conditions (Fig. 3), suggesting no effect of seasonal climate and no interaction between seasonal climate and population density on juvenile survivorship (Table 2).

We found that the largest contributors to variation in juvenile survivorship (aside from experimental error) were population density and family origin (Table 2). There were no significant interactions between either of these factors with rearing season.

Discussion

Both seasonal climate and population density during juvenile development affect frequency of macropters in A. socius. In our study, high temperatures and long day-lengths typical of the summer season led to greater numbers of macropterous males and females (Fig. 2; see comparable results in Tanaka 1978). Population density greatly compounded the effect of the summer rearing environment in producing macropterous adults, especially with crickets reared in groups (Fig. 2). At low population densities, the proportion of macropterous adults increased as climate changed from spring- to summer-like (Fig. 2; but see Walker 1987). At high population densities, we found a reduced proportion of macropterous adults (Fig. 2), a result that may be due to intraspecific competition for space and nutrients (discussed in Walker [1987] and Zera & Tiebel [1988]).

Differences in juvenile survivorship among our rearing treatments do not adequately explain the variation in incidence of macroptery. Though juvenile survivorship appeared inversely related to population density in the rearing cages, the differences in juvenile survivorship among the population-density treatments were similar between spring- and summer-rearing treatments (Fig. 3), suggesting that seasonal climate had little effect on A. socius juvenile survivorship. More importantly, the pattern of juvenile survivorship did not parallel that of adult macroptery rates among treatment groups (Fig. 2). Thus, wing length variation in A. socius appears to be a response to seasonal climate and population rearing density (Fig. 2), and does not appear to reflect differences in juvenile survivorship.

The extent to which population density affects the timing of flight wing removal in A. socius is not known. It is possible that macropterous A. socius adults shed their flight wings <3 d post-eclosion, which would have introduced a downward bias in our method of scoring macroptery. In other words, the incidence of long-winged morphs in our high cage-density treatment may actually be higher than was observed in this study (Fig. 2). Notwithstanding this potential bias, the observed pattern of juvenile survivorship does not parallel that of macroptery rates.

Probabilistic models, e.g. in Roff (1975), “adaptive coin-flipping” of Kaplan and Cooper (1984), and “stochastic polyphenism” of Walker (1986), have been proposed to explain wing polymorphism in crickets and other flight-capable insects. One simple prediction under probabilistic theory is that the proportion of long-winged adults will reflect the probability of those individuals experiencing a future environment that selects for flight. Unfortunately, the present results cannot confirm such predictions, nor can they validate probabilistic models in general because environmental variation in the wild (as experienced by A. socius juveniles of the parental generation in this study) would have been impossible to mimic in a laboratory setting. Critical tests of probabilistic models about macroptery may inevitably involve the use of more closely monitored rearing environments and isogenic lines.

The greater propensity of females than males to possess flight wings (Fig. 2) may be attributed, in part, to sex-specific reproductive behavior. In many crickets, sexually receptive females often travel some distance to locate the stationary, calling male (Loher & Dambach 1989). Presumably, the fitness gain from flight-aided mate-locating behavior more than compensates for the cost of developing the necessary flight apparatus in A. socius females.

Macroptery in male crickets, on the other hand, can impose a tremendous fitness cost in that macropterous males tend to be less successful than their short-winged counterparts in attracting females (Crnokrak & Roff 1995), although this has not been tested for A. socius. As well, male crickets probably have greater mating success when they remain in their natal habitat rather than fly to unknown destinations where mating opportunities may be scarce or absent (Walker 1986).

The greater incidence of macroptery in A. socius females than males might also reflect the role of habitat persistence in maintaining wing dimorphism (Denno et al. 1991; Roff 1994b). To the best of our knowledge, the field from which we collected crickets was watered daily and mowed every 3-6 wk during late-spring and throughout the summer months by campus grounds crew. The environmental disturbance caused by mowing could have augmented selection for late-summer dispersal, especially in female A. socius, since females can store sperm from previous matings. In such case, a female cricket has little reproductive “need” for males once she has reached the less affected periphery of her natal habitat. Thus, in patchy and temporary environments, natural selection might have acted to maintain the flight apparatus in a flight-capable female just long enough for her to escape a disturbed or deteriorating patch of habitat, and to colonize areas more conducive to oviposition and optimal development of her offspring during the regular growing season (Southwood 1962; Dingle 1996; Denno et al. 1991; Roff 1994b).

The apparent synergy between summer climate and moderate-to-high rearing density in producing long-winged A. socius suggests that, in bivoltine populations, long-wingedess is more common in the 2nd generation than in the first. In the bivoltine life cycle of A. socius, the 1st generation is comprised of individuals that had survived the past winter as diapausing eggs and then hatched out in spring. These 1st generation juveniles develop to adulthood through spring and early summer, by which time they mate and produce non-diapausing eggs that hatch out immediately (Walker & Masaki 1989; Mousseau & Dingle 1991; Olvido et al. 1998). Thus, 2nd generation juveniles appear likely to experience the macroptery-inducing summer season, as well as higher population density resulting from the presence of 1st generation adults and other newly hatched 2nd generation juveniles. Experiments are under way to assess this prediction.

On the other hand, Veazey et al. (1976) showed that macroptery rates declined from summer through autumn in a Florida population of G. firmus. Proximate mechanisms that can explain such a pattern, e.g. predation pressure and migration of macropters from field sites, have yet to be fully explored in this and other insects.

In this current study, we found no evidence that would suggest differential juvenile survival affects macroptery rates in A. socius. That is, differences in wing morph frequencies between spring- and summer-reared full-siblings of A. socius are not likely due to differences in juvenile mortality, but instead may result from a response to seasonal climate and population density during juvenile growth. However, the generality of emergence patterns in A. socius, like in G. firmus, will require further and more detailed investigation of seasonal phenology in other wing polymorphic organisms.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ken Fedorka for providing photogenic crickets. Comments from Tom Walker, Dave Reznick, Andy McCollum, Charles Henry, Bill Evans, John Sivinski, and several anonymous referees improved the manuscript considerably. This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (N.S.F.) grant IBN-9604226 to Bill Wagner Jr., a South Carolina University Research and Education fellowship to E.S.E., N.S.F. grant DEB-9409004 to T.A.M., and Ford predoctoral and N.S.F. minority postdoctoral fellowships to A.E.O.

References Cited

1.

W. J. Conover 1999. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. Google Scholar

2.

P. Crnokrak and D. A. Roff . 1995. Fitness differences associated with calling behaviour in the two wing morphs of male sand crickets, Gryllus firmus. Anim. Behav. 50:1475–1481. Google Scholar

3.

P. Crnokrak and D. A. Roff . 1998. The contingency of fitness: An analysis of food restriction on the macroptery-reproduction trade-off in crickets. Anim. Behav 56:433–441. Google Scholar

4.

H. Dingle 1996. Migration: The Biology of Life on the Move. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Google Scholar

5.

R. F. Denno, G. K. Roderick, K. L. Olmstead, and H. G. Döbel . 1991. Density-related migration in planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae): The role of habitat persistence. Am. Nat 138:1513–141. Google Scholar

6.

G. B. Ferreira, M. D. MacNeil, and L. D. Van Vleck . 1999. Variance components and breeding values for growth traits from different statistical models. J. Anim. Sci 77:2641–2650. Google Scholar

7.

D. J. Howard and D. G. Furth . 1986. Review of the Allonemobius fasciatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) complex with the description of two new species separated by electrophoresis, songs, and morphometrics. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 79:472–481. Google Scholar

8.

R. H. Kaplan and W. S. Cooper . 1984. The evolution of developmental plasticity in reproductive characteristics: An application of the “adaptive coin-flipping” principle. Am. Nat 123:393–410. Google Scholar

9.

J. G. Kingsolver and M. A R. Koehl . 1994. Selective factors in the evolution of insect wings. Annu. Rev. Entomol 39:425–451. Google Scholar

10.

W. Loher and M. Dambach . 1989. Reproductive behavior. pp. 43-82. In F. Huber, T. E. Moore, and W. Loher (eds.), Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. Google Scholar

11.

S. Masaki and T. J. Walker . 1987. Cricket life cycles. Evol. Biol 21:349–423. Google Scholar

12.

K. Meyer and W. G. Hill . 1991. Mixed model analysis of a selection experiment for food intake in mice. Genet. Res. Camb 57:71–81. Google Scholar

13.

T. A. Mousseau and D. A. Roff . 1989. Geographic variability in the incidence and heritability of wing dimorphism in the striped ground cricket, Allonemobius fasciatus. Heredity 62:315–318. Google Scholar

14.

T. A. Mousseau and H. Dingle . 1991. Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annu. Rev. Entomol 36:511–534. Google Scholar

15.

J. Neter, W. Wasserman, and M. H. Kutner . 1990. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 3rd ed. Irwin, Homewood, IL. Google Scholar

16.

V. Novotny 1995. Adaptive significance of wing dimorphism in males of Nilaparvata lugens. Entomol. Exp. Appl 76:233–239. Google Scholar

17.

A. E. Olvido and T. A. Mousseau . 1995. Effect of rearing environment on calling-song plasticity in the striped ground cricket. Evolution 49:1271–1277. Google Scholar

18.

A. E. Olvido, S. Busby, and T. A. Mousseau . 1998. Effect of maternal and embryonic environments on diapause incidence in a cricket. Anim. Behav 55:331–336. Google Scholar

19.

M. A. Rankin and J. C A. Burchsted . 1992. The cost of migration in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol 37:533–559. Google Scholar

20.

D. A. Roff 1975. Population stability and the evolution of dispersal in a heterogeneous environment. Oecologia 19:217–237. Google Scholar

21.

D. A. Roff 1990a. Antagonistic pleiotropy and the evolution of wing dimorphism in the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus. Heredity 65:169–177. Google Scholar

22.

D. A. Roff 1990b. Selection for changes in the incidence of wing dimorphism in Gryllus firmus. Heredity 65:163–168. Google Scholar

23.

D. A. Roff 1994a. Evidence that the magnitude of the trade-off in a dichotomous trait is frequency dependent. Evolution 48:1650–1656. Google Scholar

24.

D. A. Roff 1994b. Habitat persistence and the evolution of wing dimorphism in insects. Am. Nat 144:772–798. Google Scholar

25.

D. A. Roff and D. J. Fairbairn . 1991. Wing dimorphisms and the evolution of migratory polymorphisms among the Insecta. Am. Zool 31:243–251. Google Scholar

26.

SAS Institute 1989. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 6, Vol. 2, 4th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Google Scholar

27.

R. G. Shaw 1987. Maximum-likelihood approaches to quantitative genetics of natural populations. Evolution 41:812–826. Google Scholar

28.

T. R E. Southwood 1962. Migration of terrestrial arthropods in relation to habitat. Biol. Rev 37:171–214. Google Scholar

29.

S. Tanaka 1978. Day-length determination of wing form in Pteronemobius nitidus Bolivar (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Kontyû (Tokyo) 46:207–217. Google Scholar

30.

M. J. Tauber, C. A. Tauber, and S. Masaki . 1986. Seasonal Adaptations of Insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Google Scholar

31.

J. N. Veazey, C. A. Rolph Kay, T. J. Walker, and W. H. Whitcomb . 1976. Seasonal abundance, sex ratio, and macroptery of field crickets in Northern Florida. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69:374–380. Google Scholar

32.

K. Vepsäläinen 1978. Wing dimorphism and diapause in Gerris: Determination and adaptive significance. pp. 218-253. In H. Dingle (ed.), Evolution of Insect Migration and Diapause. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. Google Scholar

33.

T. J. Walker 1986. Stochastic polyphenism: Coping with uncertainty. Florida Entomol 69:46–62. Google Scholar

34.

T. J. Walker 1987. Wing dimorphism in Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 80:547–560. Google Scholar

35.

T. J. Walker and S. Masaki . 1989. Natural history. pp. 1-42. In F. Huber, T. E. Moore and W. Loher (eds.), Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. Google Scholar

36.

R. A. Wood 1996. Weather of U.S. Cities. 5th ed. Gale Research, Detroit, MI. Google Scholar

37.

A. J. Zera and K. C. Tiebel . 1988. Brachypterizing effect of group rearing, juvenile hormone III, and methoprene in the wing-dimorphic cricket, Gryllus rubens. J. Insect Physiol 34:489–498. Google Scholar

Appendices

Fig. 1.

Wing polymorphism in A. socius. Females are distinguished from males by the presence of a sword-like ovipositor protruding from the posterior end of the abdomen. Note the flight wings in long-winged adults--the two individuals flanking the vertical black bar--extend from beneath the darker tegmina (i.e., outer wings). Length of vertical black bar is 20 mm.

i0015-4040-86-2-158-f01.gif

Fig. 2.

The effects of rearing season and population density during juvenile development on mean (SE) incidence of macroptery in A. socius males and females. All juveniles reared in isolation and under spring-like conditions emerged as short-winged adults.

i0015-4040-86-2-158-f02.gif

Fig. 3.

Juvenile survivorship of A. socius at different rearing densities and seasonal climates. Column height represents the mean (SE) proportion of newly hatched juveniles that eventually emerged as adults. Numbers in parentheses above each clear column indicates total number of individually reared A. socius juveniles scored for that treatment.

i0015-4040-86-2-158-f03.gif

Table 1.      Effect of rearing environment on the difference in the proportion of long-winged females to long-winged males.

i0015-4040-86-2-158-t01.gif

Table 2.

  Restricted maximum-likelihood variance-components estimation of relative contribution to incidence of long-winged, emerging adults and to juvenile survivorship.

i0015-4040-86-2-158-t02.gif
Alexander E. Olvido, Elizabeth S. Elvington, and Timothy A. Mousseau "RELATIVE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE AND CROWDING ON WING POLYMORPHISM IN THE SOUTHERN GROUND CRICKET, ALLONEMOBIUS SOCIUS (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLIDAE)," Florida Entomologist 86(2), 158-164, (1 June 2003). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2003)086[0158:REOCAC]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 June 2003
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top