Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
Janet Kintz-Early, Leslie Parris, Jennifer Zettler, Josh Bast
Author Affiliations +

Polygynous red imported fire ant populations have the potential for greater economic and environmental damage than the monogyne form because polygyne mound and population densities are two to three times greater than monogyne mound and population densities (Lofgren & Williams 1984; Vinson & Sorensen 1986; Porter 1992; Macom & Porter 1996). In addition to polygyne mound diameters being slightly smaller than monogyne mounds (Porter 1992), polygynous workers are smaller, lighter in color, and less aggressive toward neighboring mounds. Polygyne queens lay fewer eggs, weigh less than monogyne queens (Greenberg et al. 1985), and produce fewer reproductives (Vinson & Sorensen 1986). Polygynous colonies reproduce both via mating flights and budding but reproduce primarily by budding (Vargo & Porter 1989). Polygynous colonies, due to their abundance and competitive pressure, have a greater capacity to eliminate arthropods, including native ant species (Porter & Savignano 1990), plants, and vertebrates (Porter et al. 1991). The purpose of this study is to document the overall presence of polygynous colonies of S. invicta in the state of South Carolina. This information may be used to improve the effectiveness of red imported fire ant management because polygyny may affect the type and duration of control needed and pesticide application rates (Porter et al. 1991).

Seven counties across five edaphic regions of South Carolina (Blue Ridge, Piedmont, Southeastern Plains, Middle Atlantic Coastal Plains and Southern Coastal Plains) were evaluated during the fall of 1999 and spring of 2000 for the likelihood of possessing polygynous red imported fire ant colonies. S. invicta queens were collected from roadsides and pastures in five South Carolina counties (Pickens, Anderson, Aiken, Richland, and Beaufort) using high mound densities (200+ mounds/ha) as an indicator of polygyny. Horry and Colleton counties were also surveyed but mound densities were too low to suspect polygynous colonies were established there.

Two to six colonies were sampled from each site suspected of polygyny. Queens were collected from the surface of overturned mounds or by excavating colonies. Excavated colonies were placed into 18.9-L buckets with a 7.6-cm Fluon® band at the top. The drip-flotation method was used to remove queens from the soil (Banks et al. 1981). All red imported fire ant queens were stored in 70% alcohol until they were dissected to confirm that each queen had mated and established within the colony. Dissection was completed using the technique of Glancey et al. (1973) to identify the presence of both an enlarged sperm-filled spermatheca and degenerated wing muscles. In colonies with multiple dealates, up to five randomly selected queens were dissected.

This study shows polygynous red imported fire ants are present in South Carolina (Fig. 1). Beaufort was the only county sampled that did not have multiple inseminated queens. Out of the remaining fifteen colonies sampled from four counties, thirteen colonies from a total of four counties (Pickens, Anderson, Aiken and Richland) had multiple inseminated queens with degenerated wing muscles. At the time of sampling, our results indicated polygyny was found in the Blue Ridge, Piedmont and southeastern plains of South Carolina. Observations in two coastal counties suggested that polygyne red imported fire ant may not be present in the Middle Atlantic or southern coastal plains. Further study is warranted to determine the extent of polygyny throughout the state of South Carolina.

We would like to thank Jack Keener, Marion Barnes, Dr. Jeff Isley, Jodi Bock and TCI International (Aiken Co. Fish Farm) for assistance in locating potential polygynous sites. We would also like to thank Clyde S. Gorsuch and Craig Allen for their assistance. This article is technical contribution No. 4829 of the South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station.


Polygynous red imported fire ant colonies were found in the western and central regions of South Carolina. Additional studies should be conducted to more precisely determine the extent of polygyny in the state of South Carolina.

References Cited


W. A. Banks, C. S. Lofgren, D. P. Jouvenaz, C. E. Stringer, P. M. Bishop, D. F. Williams, D. P. Wojcik, and B. M. Glancey . 1981. Techniques for collecting, rearing, and handling imported fire ants. New Orleans: USDA-ARS-SEA. p. 9. Google Scholar


L. Greenberg, D. J C. Fletcher, and S. B. Vinson . 1985. Differences in worker size and mound distribution in monogynous and polygynous colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc 58:9–18. Google Scholar


C. S. Lofgren and D. F. Williams . 1984. Polygynous colonies of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Florida. Florida Entomol 67:484–486. Google Scholar


T. E. Macom and S. D. Porter . 1996. Comparison of polygyne and monogyne red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) population densities. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 89:535–543. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter 1992. Frequency and distribution of polygyne fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Florida. Florida Entomol 75:248–257. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter, A. Bhatkar, R. Mulder, S. B. Vinson, and D. J. Clair . 1991. Distribution and density of polygyne fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Texas. J. Econ. Entomol 84:866–874. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter and D. A. Savignano . 1990. Invasion of polygyne fire ants decimates native ants and disrupts arthropod community. Ecology 7:2095–2106. Google Scholar


E. L. Vargo and S. D. Porter . 1989. Colony reproduction by budding in the polygyne form of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 82:307–313. Google Scholar


S. B. Vinson and A. A. Sorensen . 1986. Imported Fire Ants: Life History and Impact. Texas Depart. Agric. 28 pp. Google Scholar


Fig. 1.

South Carolina map showing counties sampled for polygynous red imported fire ant colonies. Counties in the Blue Ridge, Piedmont and southeastern plains had polygynous colonies while only monogynous colonies appeared to be in the Middle Atlantic and southern Coastal Plains counties. This map is adapted from an EPA ecoregion map and the U.S. census county map.

Janet Kintz-Early, Leslie Parris, Jennifer Zettler, and Josh Bast "EVIDENCE OF POLYGYNOUS RED IMPORTED FIRE ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) IN SOUTH CAROLINA," Florida Entomologist 86(3), 381-382, (1 September 2003).[0381:EOPRIF]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 September 2003
Back to Top