Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2004 SAFETY OF A NOVEL INSECTICIDE, SUCROSE OCTANOATE, TO BENEFICIAL INSECTS IN FLORIDA CITRUS
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Laboratory trials were used to estimate the toxicity of sucrose octanoate to beneficial insects representing four insect orders of importance in biological control in Florida citrus. First instars of the ladybeetles Cycloneda sanguinea L., Curinus coeruleus Mulsant, Harmonia axyridis Pallas and Olla v-nigrum Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and the lacewing Chrysoperla rufilabris Burmeister (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) survived topical sprays of sucrose octanoate at 8,000 ppm without significant mortality, a concentration corresponding to twice the recommended field rate required to kill aphids and other soft bodied pests. Similarly, adults of the red scale parasitoid, Aphytis melinus De Bach (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and second instars of the predatory bug Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) survived 24 h exposures to residues of 8,000 ppm sucrose octanoate on leaf disks without significant mortality. The efficacy of sucrose octanoate as a contact insecticide against various homopteran pests of citrus, combined with its low toxicity to key beneficial insects in the citrus ecosystem, suggest that it may be a valuable material for incorporation into IPM programs for Florida citrus.

One of the challenges of insect control with pesticides in agricultural IPM programs is achieving selection and kill of target pests while minimizing mortality to beneficial insects. However, phytophagous pest insects typically are more resistant to synthetic toxins than are predacious and parasitic insects due to the evolution of mechanisms for detoxification of plant secondary compounds (Croft 1990). This problem might be overcome by the development of more selective compounds with modes of action specific to pest insects, or by selective application techniques such as spot treatments that permit the survival of beneficial insects in untreated refuges. Effective IPM programs require, or are in need of, new materials with novel modes of action that can be applied in rotation with existing pesticides to avoid strong directional selection for resistance development in pest populations.

Sucrose octanoate is one of a series of synthetic sugar esters that are analogues of compounds naturally occurring in the glandular trichomes of wild tobacco, Nicotiana gossei Domin. Sugar esters, also known as acyl sugars or polyol esters, are a relatively novel class of insecticidal compounds produced by reacting sugars with aliphatic or aromatic fatty acids (Puterka et al. 2003). Sucrose esters are benign to the environment, occur naturally in plants and are commercially synthesized for use in the food industry (Chortyk et al. 1996). The exudates of glandular trichomes of N. gossei have been known for many years to contain compounds with insecticidal activity (Thurston & Webster 1962). It was determined during the last decade that the primary insecticidal compounds within these glandular trichomes are sucrose esters (Buta et al. 1993, Pittarelli et al. 1993). Synthetic sucrose esters that are similar in structure to those that naturally occur in N. gossei have comparable insecticidal activity (Chortyk et al. 1996). Both natural and synthetic sucrose esters have been shown to have contact toxicity with very rapid knockdown of soft-bodied arthropods, including aphids (Neal et al. 1994), whiteflies (Liu et al. 1996) and psyllids (Puterka & Severson 1995). Feeding and ovipositional deterrence to mites (Neal et al. 1994), whiteflies (Liu & Stansly 1995) and leafminers (Hawthorne et al. 1992) also have been demonstrated with sucrose esters.

Although the mode of action is unknown, it has been suggested that sugar esters affect the insect cuticle causing death by rapid desiccation (Thurston & Webster 1962). Parr and Thurston (1968) observed that topical applications of N. gossei trichome exudates applied to larvae of Manduca sexta (L.) turned the cuticle transparent and caused rapid loss of body fluids followed by death. Similarly, Liu and Stansly (1995) observed that nymphs of the whitefly Bemisia argentifolia Perring and Bellows dried quickly and detached from the leaf surface when treated with N. gossei extracts.

McKenzie and Puterka (2000) demonstrated an LC90 (topical spray) for sucrose octanoate ranging from 4,000-7,360 ppm for nymphs of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, an important disease vector in citrus. Other work has demonstrated good insecticidal activity against the brown citrus aphid, Toxoptera citricida (Kirkaldy) at even lower concentrations (McKenzie, unpublished data). Although the safety of sucrose esters for beneficial insects in citrus has not yet been examined, Stansly and Liu (1997) found that they had little or no effect on the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia pergandiella Howard. In order to ascertain the safety of sucrose octanoate for natural enemies in citrus, we selected candidate species for testing that represented four different orders of beneficial insects known to be important in biological control of homopteran pests, the primary targets of this material. Aphytis melinus De Bach (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) is a primary parasitoid of the California red scale. The green lacewing Chrysoperla rufilabris Burmeister (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), and the insidious flower bug, Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), are both generalist predators of many small arthropods in citrus, including mites, aphids, psyllids and thrips. We also tested four species of ladybeetles, Curinus coeruleus Mulsant, Cycloneda sanguinea L., Harmonia axyridis Pallas, and Olla v-nigrum Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) that are all important predators of homopteran citrus pests (Michaud 1999; Michaud 2002a; Michaud et al. 2002).

Materials and Methods

Adult beetles of each of the four coccinellid species were maintained in 1-L ventilated glass mason jars (∼100-130/jar) filled with strips of shredded wax paper for their first 9-12 days of life following emergence. During this period, beetles were fed a diet of frozen eggs of Ephestia sp. and bee pollen with water provided on a cotton wick. Mated adult females were transferred to individual plastic Petri dishes (5.5 cm dia × 1.0 cm) and provisioned with Ephestia eggs and water encapsulated in polymer beads. Eggs were harvested daily in the Petri dishes and held in an incubator at 24°C, 60 ± 5% RH under fluorescent light (P:S-16:8) and hatched ca. 3.5 ± 0.5 days later under these conditions. Newly hatched larvae were placed in individual plastic Petri dishes (as above) and reared on Ephestia eggs and water beads on a laboratory bench at 24 ± 2°C, 60 ± 5% RH, with fluorescent lighting (P:S = 16:8). Larvae were used for experiments when they were 24 ± 6 h old.

Eggs of C. rufilabris were obtained from Beneficial Insectary (Redding, CA) and held in an incubator at 24 ± 1°C until hatching. Larvae used in experiments were 24 ± 6 h old.

Adult A. melinus were obtained from Rincon-Vitova Insectaries Inc. (Ventura, CA). Adults were fed a diluted honey solution and used in experiments when they were 36-60 h old.

Newly hatched nymphs of O. insidiosus were obtained from Entomos, LLC (Gainesville, FL). Nymphs were provided with frozen Ephestia eggs and water beads and used in experiments when they molted to the second instar.

Topical Sprays

The Potter Precision Spray Tower (Burkard Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Rickmansworth Herts, UK) permits delivery of a standardized dose of an insecticide at a specified concentration with a consistent droplet size under controlled conditions. The Potter tower has been used previously to determine the toxic concentrations of various conventional pesticides to beneficial insects in citrus (Michaud 2001; Michaud 2002b). First instars of each coccinellid species (n = 20) were treated directly with a 1.0-ml aqueous solution of sucrose octanoate at 8000 ppm. Control larvae (n = 20) were treated with 1 ml of distilled water. Larvae were reared to adulthood in individual Petri dishes (as above) on a diet of frozen Ephestia eggs. Estimates of mortality incorporated all mortality through to emergence of adults. Data were corrected for control mortality by Abbott’s correction (Abbott 1925) and analyzed with a Chi-square, Goodness-of-fit Test (α = 0.05).

Leaf Residues

Due to their high activity levels, adult parasitoids and Orius nymphs were exposed to leaf residues instead of topical sprays. Leaf disks were punched from clean grapefruit leaves that had been washed in a 0.5%-sodium hypochlorite solution. Adaxial sides of the leaf disks (n = 25) were then sprayed with a 1.0 ml-aqueous solution of sucrose octanoate at 8000 ppm in the Potter Spray Tower; control disks (n = 25) were sprayed with 1 ml distilled water. Treated leaf disks were placed in individual Petri dishes (5.0 cm dia × 1.0 cm) and insects were transferred individually to each dish.

Adult A. melinus were provided with a droplet of diluted honey on the lid of the Petri dish and mortality was assessed after 24 h. Nymphs of O. insidiosus were confined on the leaf disks for 24 h, removed to clean dishes, and reared to adulthood on a diet of frozen Ephestia eggs and water beads. The mortality estimate for O. insidiosus incorporates all mortality from nymph through adult stage. Data from all experiments were adjusted for control mortality by Abbott’s correction (Abbott 1925) and analyzed by a Chi-Square, Goodness-of-Fit test (α = 0.05).

Results and Discussion

Treatment mortality was never significantly different from control mortality for any species of beneficial insect in any trial (Table 1). The fact that sugar esters seem to have active toxicity only in liquid form (Puterka & Severson 1995) may have influenced the results obtained for O. insidiosus and A. melinus with leaf disk residues. Yet these authors showed residual activity to newly eclosed nymphs. Contact with residues is probably the primary form of exposure for foraging natural enemies, so the lack of activity is significant. Similarly, Stansly and Liu (1997) found low toxicity of natural and synthetic sugar esters to E. pergandiella, an important parasitoid of the silverleaf whitefly, and concluded that these materials would be compatible with biological control of B. argentifolia in vegetable fields.

Materials demonstrating toxicity to beneficial insects in laboratory trials warrant further testing under field conditions before it can be concluded they pose a risk to biological control under real-world conditions (Croft 1990). This does not appear to be the case for sucrose octanoate. These laboratory trials demonstrate the lack of toxicity of sucrose octanoate for insects representing four different orders of beneficial insects that include most natural enemy species important for biological control in citrus. We conclude that sucrose octanoate appears to have good potential for inclusion in IPM programs designed to manage homopteran pests in citrus, with a low probability of adverse side effects on important beneficial species.

Plant chemical defenses are rarely 100% effective against herbivores, so advantages accrue to plants that can spare natural enemies, or even encourage their recruitment. The fact that sucrose octanoate has contact toxicity against certain herbivorous insects and mites, but not against larval predators, raises interesting questions regarding its mode of action. Are beneficial insects resistant to sucrose octanoate because its binding sites on the cuticle are lacking or insensitive? If so, characterizing differences in cuticular chemistry between resistant and susceptible insects may provide insights into the mode of action of sugar esters.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Gary J. Puterka of the Appalachian Fruit Research Station, USDA-ARS, Kearneysville, WV for supplying the experimental compound and reviewing the manuscript, Drs. R. Stuart and C.W. McCoy for additional reviews, and L. Tretyak for technical support. This work was supported by the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station and grants from the Florida Citrus Producers Research Advisory Council and USDA, APHIS and approved for publication as Journal Series No. R09154.

References

1.

W. S. Abbott 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol 18:265–267. Google Scholar

2.

J. G. Buta, W. R. Lusby, J. W. Neal Jr., R. M. Waters, and G. W. Pittarelli . 1993. Sucrose esters from Nicotiana gossei active against greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum. Phytochem 22:859–864. Google Scholar

3.

O. T. Chortyk, J. G. Pomonis, and A. W. Johnson . 1996. Synthesis and characterizations of insecticidal sucrose esters. J. Agric. Food Chem 44:1551–1557. Google Scholar

4.

B. A. Croft 1990. Arthropod biological control agents and pesticides. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 723 pp. Google Scholar

5.

D. J. Hawthorne, J. A. Shapiro, W. M. Tingey, and M. A. Mutschler . 1992. Trichome-borne and artificially applied acylsugars of wild tomato deter feeding and oviposition of the leafminer Liriomyza trifolii. Entomol. Exp. Appl 65:65–73. Google Scholar

6.

T-X. Liu and P. A. Stansly . 1995. Toxicity and repellency of some biorational insecticides to Bemisia argentifolii on tomato plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl 74:137–143. Google Scholar

7.

T-X. Liu, P. A. Stansly, and O. T. Chortyk . 1996. Insecticidal activity of natural and synthetic sugar esters against Bemesia argentifolii (Homoptera: Alyrodidae). J. Econ. Entomol 89:1233–1239. Google Scholar

8.

C. L. McKenzie and G. J. Puterka . 2000. Activity of sugar esters to Asiatic citrus psyllid (AsCP). Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, Congress-2000, December 3-7, Orlando, FL. Google Scholar

9.

J. P. Michaud 1999. Sources of mortality in colonies of the brown citrus aphid, Toxoptera citricida. Biocontrol 44:347–367. Google Scholar

10.

J. P. Michaud 2001. Relative toxicity of six insecticides to Cycloneda sanguinea and Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J. Entomol. Sci 37:83–93. Google Scholar

11.

J. P. Michaud 2002a. Biological control of Asian citrus psyllid in Florida: A preliminary report. Entomol. News 113:216–222. Google Scholar

12.

J. P. Michaud 2002b. Non-target impacts of acaricides on ladybeetles in citrus: A laboratory study. Florida Entomol 85:191–196. Google Scholar

13.

J. P. Michaud, C. C. McCoy, and S. Futch . 2002. Ladybeetles as biological control agents in citrus. Citrus Industry 83:324–27. Google Scholar

14.

J. W. Neal Jr., J. G. Buta, G. W. Pittarelli, W. R. Lusby, and J. A. Benz . 1994. Novel sucrose esters from Nicotiana gossei: Effective biorationals against selected horticultural insect pests. J. Econ. Entomol 87:1600–1607. Google Scholar

15.

J. C. Parr and R. Thurston . 1968. Toxicity of Nicotianaand Petunia species to larvae of the tobacco hornworm. J. Econ. Entomol 61:1525–1531. Google Scholar

16.

G. W. Pittarelli, J. G. Buta, J. W. Neal Jr., W. R. Lusby, and R. M. Waters . 1993. Biological pesticide derived from Nicotiana Plants. U.S. Patent No. 5,260,281. Google Scholar

17.

G. J. Puterka and R. F. Severson . 1995. Activity of Sugar esters isolated from the trichomes of Nicotiana gossei to pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae). J. Econ. Entomol 88:615–619. Google Scholar

18.

G. J. Puterka, W. Farone, T. Palmer, and A. Barrington . 2003. Structure-function relationships affecting the insecticidal and miticidal activities of sugar esters. J. Econ. Entomol 96:636–644. Google Scholar

19.

P. A. Stansly and T. X. Liu . 1997. Selectivity of insecticides to Encarsia pergandiella (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), an endoparasitoid of Bemisi argentifolii (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Bull. Entom. Res 87:525–531. Google Scholar

20.

R. Thurston and J. A. Webster . 1962. Toxicity of Nicotiana gossei Domin to Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Entomol. Exp. Appl 5:233–238. Google Scholar

Appendices

Table 1.

Percent mortality of beneficial insects treated with topical sprays or 24 h exposure to leaf residues of a 2% sucrose octanoate solution (=8000 ppm).

i0015-4040-87-1-6-t01.gif
J. P. Michaud and C. L. McKenzie "SAFETY OF A NOVEL INSECTICIDE, SUCROSE OCTANOATE, TO BENEFICIAL INSECTS IN FLORIDA CITRUS," Florida Entomologist 87(1), 6-9, (1 March 2004). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2004)087[0006:SOANIS]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 March 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top