Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2004 A FLORIDA CATERPILLAR AND OTHER ARTHROPODS INHABITING THE WEBS OF A SUBSOCIAL SPIDER (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE; ARANEIDA: THERIDIIDAE)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Caterpillars of Tallula watsoni Barnes & McDunnough regularly occur in the webs of the subsocial spider Anelosimus studiosus (Hentz) in south Florida. The caterpillars have not been found outside of the spider webs. Caterpillars feed on living and dead leaves that are on twigs incorporated into the webs of the spiders. A wide variety of trees and woody shrubs are accepted. In the laboratory caterpillars did not attack spiders or their prey. Spiders did not normally attack the caterpillars in the laboratory, but did so on two occasions. Pupation occurs in the spider web. We speculate that the spider web provides the caterpillars some protection from generalist predators and parasitoids. We suspect that T. watsoni is an obligate inquiline of A. studiosus. Other inquilines in the spider webs include 13 species of spiders and 10 species of insects. Two insects may have close or obligate relationships with A. studiosus: Ranzovius clavicornis (Knight) (Miridae), a scavenger, and Zatypota crassipes Townes (Ichneumonidae), a parasitoid of A. studiosus.

The insect world abounds with evolutionary opportunists stealing resources from fierce predatory arthropods. Camp-follower silverfish and wasps scurry beside raiding army ants (Hölldobler & Wilson 1990), milichiid flies land beside the fangs of spiders and sip the blood of crushed stink bugs (Eisner et al.1991), and satellite flies dart in to deposit larvae on the prey of fly-eating digger wasps (Evans 1966). This paper portrays another apparently risky relationship: a caterpillar that makes its home and finds its food in the communal webs of a subsocial spider.

Tallula watsoni Barnes & McDunnough (Fig. 1) is a moth in the subfamily Epipaschiinae of the family Pyralidae. It is known from Maryland through Florida (Adams 2003). To our knowledge, the only published host record is “larvae on oranges” (Kimball 1965), presumably referring to caterpillars feeding on orange tree foliage, not fruits. At the Archbold Biological Station (ABS) in south-central Florida we have repeatedly raised adult moths from caterpillars feeding on leaves incorporated into the webs of the spider Anelosimus studiosus (Hentz). This spider, whose range extends from New England to Argentina (Jones & Parker 2002), spins irregular, tangled webs in vegetation; at the ABS the webs are always on outer twigs of trees and shrubs. The web is begun by a single female, who is eventually accompanied by her offspring, including up to 50 individuals (Brach 1977, Furey 1998). The larger webs may be inhabited by inquilines, including a mirid bug, Ranzovius clavicornis (Knight), which scavenges on dead insects (Wheeler & McCaffrey 1984). Vincent Brach, whose 1977 paper was based on work done at the ABS, mentions that the webs may be “shared by a host of other arthropods.” The “pyralid webworms” that he found were almost certainly T. watsoni. In our paper we present some details of the natural history of T. watsoni and consider some implications of its inquiline life style.

Materials and Methods

The Archbold Biological Station, Highlands County, in south-central Florida has several plant associations where A. studiosus regularly occurs, including seasonal ponds with woody Hypericum species, Florida rosemary (Ceratiola) barrens, and oak scrub around the margin of a lake. For details of the vegetation of the ABS, see Abrahamson et al. (1984). Twenty-eight assemblages of spiders and caterpillars were kept in the laboratory by clipping the twigs in which the webs were constructed and placing the twigs in small jars of water. A plastic bag was placed over the twigs to maintain humidity and to retain the spiders’ prey, wild-caught Drosophila sp. Caterpillars were also removed from the twigs and reared on foliage without spiders. Thirty-nine webs were removed from the field and completely dissected in the laboratory, with tabulation of the arthropod species found in the web system. Between February and April, 1997, we surveyed A. studiosus webs in the field for presence/absence of caterpillars. Parasitoids of the spiders also were surveyed.

Results and Discussion

Distribution of Caterpillars in the Field

At the ABS we disassembled and examined 503 webs of A. studiosus, of which 34 (6.8%) contained one or more caterpillars of T. watsoni; a total of 63 caterpillars were found. Up to four caterpillars occurred in a web system. Caterpillars fed on leaves from a wide variety of trees and shrubs whose leaves were incorporated into the spider webs. Plant hosts were: Empetraceae: Ceratiola ericoides Michaux; Fagaceae: Quercus geminata Small, Q. chapmanii Sargent, Q. myrtifolia Willdenow, Q. virginiana Miller; Myricaceae: Myrica cerifera L.; Asteraceae: Baccharis halimifolia L.; Ericaceae: Lyonia fruticosa (Michaux); Hypericaceae: Hypericum edisonianum (Small) Adams & Robson; Ulmaceae: Celtis laevigata Willdenow.

Behavior of Caterpillars and Spiders in Webs

The following observations on T. watsoni were made in the field and in the laboratory. Caterpillars in the field were associated with gnawed leaves and with frass caught up in the webbing. In the laboratory, caterpillars fed on dead leaves as well as living leaves. In the field, dead leaves that fell from shrubs into the spider webs sometimes showed damage and associated frass, as if the caterpillars had fed on them. In the laboratory, caterpillars made a loose network of webbing, both when isolated from spiders and when kept together with spiders. We never found caterpillars in the field that had set up webs independently, without spiders. Spiders and caterpillars were often adjacent to each other in a web (Fig. 2D); we do not know whether the spiders move into, or utilize in any way, the webbing spun by the caterpillars. In the laboratory, caterpillars apparently did not respond to spiders or their prey. They spent most of the day suspended motionless in the web, with the head cocked back in a distinctive way (Fig. 2C). On two occasions, when a caterpillar was being introduced into a spider colony, the spiders attacked and ate the caterpillars. Pupation occurs in the web (Fig. 2B); we observed no interaction between spiders and pupae. Adults emerging in the laboratory always escaped from the spiders’ web. During the day, adults assume a characteristic posture with the wings partially furled (Fig. 2A). We did not observe mating or oviposition. Caterpillars are occasionally (five instances out of 63 caterpillars) attacked by a parasitoid wasp, Apanteles sp. (Braconidae). One caterpillar produced a parasitoid wasp in the family Chalcididae: Brachymeria hammari (Crawford). At the ABS this wasp has also been reared from Antaeotrichia vestalis (Zeller) (Oecophoridae), whose caterpillars make retreats of leaves sewn together with silk. Brachymeria hammari is a widely distributed species known to be a primary parasitoid of caterpillars in the families Pyralidae, Gelechiidae, and Tortricidae (Burks 1960).

As far as we know, T. watsoni is an obligate inquiline of A. studiosus, at least at the ABS. We also suspect that larval T. watsoni, unlike the mirid Ranzovius clavicornis studied by Wheeler & McCaffrey (1984), is exclusively phytophagous. There is no evidence that it scavenges on dead insects in the manner of caterpillars of Neopalthis madates Druce (Noctuidae) in the webs of the tropical social spider Anelosimus eximius Simon (Robinson 1977).

There is no reason to suspect that T. watsoni has any positive or negative effect on A. studiosus. The caterpillars contribute webbing that might entangle passing insects that then fall into the spiders’ web, but it seems unlikely that this occurs to any significant extent, or that the ability to produce webbing is limiting to the spiders. The spiders often shelter or hide below leaves in the web, but we have not seen cases in which the caterpillars removed all such leaves, depriving the spiders of shelter. We offer no hypothetical adaptive reason why the spiders should tolerate edible caterpillars in their webs. The simplest hypothesis is that the caterpillars avoid triggering predatory responses, possibly by remaining motionless when the spiders approach. It is reasonable to suppose that communal spiders are somewhat less reactive to movement in their web than are solitary spiders (Wheeler & McCaffrey 1984). This would help explain the variety of inquilines, including T. watsoni, that inhabit webs of A. studiosus at the ABS (see list below).

It is easier to speculate about possible advantages and disadvantages of its peculiar life style to T. watsoni. An obvious disadvantage is that the polyphagous caterpillars forego all but a tiny fraction of potential host material by confining its consumption to vegetation within the web of a particular spider. There is also the possibility that some caterpillars may fall prey to spiders, or that they may restrict their feeding and movements in order to prevent triggering a predatory response from the spiders. An advantage to living in a spider web might be protection by the spiders and their web from local predators that may be reluctant to enter spider webs, such as certain Formicidae, Vespidae, Tachinidae, Ichneumonidae, Braconidae, and Chalcidoidea. While this seems a likely benefit, it has not been tested.

We provisionally classify T. watsoni in a general category of inquilines associated with well-defended hosts that are presumed to be defended by those hosts, even though studying the inquiline in the absence of its host is not practical. There are familiar examples of this, such as the relationship between clown fish and stinging sea anemones. There are four additional species of Tallula in North America, and it is possible that one or more of these species is free-living and could be used in a comparative study of relative mortality.

Other Inquilines of A. studiosus at the Archbold Biological Station

As mentioned by Brach (1977), a wide variety of arthropods can be found in the webs of A. studiosus and on the vegetation incorporated into the webs. At the ABS 39 webs were removed from the field and fully dissected, with all species of arthropods noted from each web. In the following list, the number following the name of an arthropod indicates the number of samples (out of 39) that had the arthropod listed; numbers of individuals are not tallied. Araneida: Araneidae: Metazygia sp. (3), Eustala sp. (1); Linyphiidae: Florinda coccinea (Hentz) (2); Salticidae: Hentzia palmarum (Hentz) (1), Hentzia sp. (5), Peckhamia sp. (1); Anyphaenidae, unidentified to genus (8); Clubionidae: Castianeira sp. (1); Theridiidae: Dipoena sp. (1); Argyrodes trigona (Hentz) (4); Tetragnathidae: undetermined to genus (6); Mimetidae: Mimetus sp. (2); Oxyopidae: Peucetia viridans (Hentz) (2); Heteroptera: Tingidae: Corythuca floridana Heidemann (1); Miridae: Ranzovius clavicornis (16); Diptera: Empididae: Drapetis sp. (2); Psocoptera: unidentified to family (12); Collembola: Entomobryiidae: unidentified to genus (15); Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Monomorium viride Brown (1), Crematogaster ashmeadi Mayr (1); Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Tallula watsoni (8); Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Epitragodes tomentosus (LeConte) (1).

During the survey of 503 webs, wasp larvae (Ichneumonidae) were found feeding externally on five spiders. Four females and one male of Zatypota crassipes Townes were reared from these larvae. This appears to be the first record of Z. crassipes from any host spider. Members of the genus Zatypota are all presumed to be external parasitoids of spiders (Townes & Townes 1960). The cocoon of Z. crassipes is pale brown and covered with semi-erect loops of silk. Several other species of Zaptypota also have loops of silk covering their cocoons (Townes & Townes 1960); the function of these loops is unknown.

Aside from T. watsoni, the mirid Ranzovius clavicornis and the wasp Z. crassicornis, it is unlikely that many of the arthropods listed above have a close or obligate relationship with A. studiosus. Some may even be potential prey items with short persistence in the webs. Further studies at other sites might help distinguish between casual inquilines, habitual inquilines, and inquilines that are dependent on A. studiosus. There might also be oligolectic phytophagous inquilines that require plants that are absent from the ABS. The web inhabitants of A. studiosus, if studied throughout the range of the spider, could present an interesting model of the transitions between opportunism and specialization.

Acknowledgments

We thank James Carrel for helping to identify spiders, for useful comments on the first draft of this paper, and for generously sharing his extensive knowledge of spiders. We thank Maria Eisner for composing and preparing the plate of photographs. This study was supported by the Archbold Biological Station.

References Cited

1.

W. G. Abrahamson, A. F. Johnson, J. N. Layne, and P. A. Peroni . 1984. Vegetation of the Archbold Biological Station, Florida: An example of the southern Lake Wales Ridge. Florida Scientist 47::209–250. Google Scholar

2.

J. K. Adams 2003. Moths and butterflies of Georgia and the southeastern United States.  http://www.daltonstate.edu/galep/index./htm Revised 5 November 2003. Google Scholar

3.

V. Brach 1977. Anelosimus studiosus (Araneae: Theridiidae) and the evolution of quasisociality in theridiid spiders. Evolution 31::154–161. Google Scholar

4.

B. D. Burks 1960. A revision of the genus Brachymeria Westwood in America north of Mexico (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae). Trans. Amer. Entomol. Soc 86::225–273 + 3 pl. Google Scholar

5.

T. Eisner, M. Eisner, and M. Deyrup . 1991. Chemical attraction of kleptoparasitic flies to heteropteran insects caught by orb-weaving spiders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88::8194–8197. Google Scholar

6.

H. E. Evans 1966. The Comparative Ethology and Evolution of the Sand Wasps. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 526 pp. Google Scholar

7.

R. E. Furey 1998. Two cooperatively social populations of the theridiid spider Anelosimus studiosus in a temperate region. Anim. Behav 55::727–735. Google Scholar

8.

B. Hölldobler and E. O. Wilson . 1990. The Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 732 pp. Google Scholar

9.

T. C. Jones and P. G. Parker . 2002. Delayed juvenile dispersal benefits both mother and offspring in the cooperative spider Anelosimus studiosus (Araneae: Theridiidae). Behav. Ecol 13::1–148. Google Scholar

10.

C. P. Kimball 1965. Arthropods of Florida and Neighboring Land Areas. pp. 1-363 In Vol. I. Lepidoptera of Florida. Florida Dept. Agr. Div. Plant Indust. Google Scholar

11.

M. H. Robinson 1977. Symbioses between insects and spiders: an association between lepidopteran larvae and the social spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae). Psyche 84::225–232. Google Scholar

12.

H. Townes and M. Townes . 1960. Ichneumon-flies of America north of Mexico: 2. Subfamilies Ephialtinae, Xoridinae, Acaenitinae. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus 216::1–676. Google Scholar

13.

A. G. Wheeler Jr and J. P. McCaffrey . 1984. Ranzovius contubernalis: Seasonal history, habits, and description of fifth instar, with speculation on the origin of spider commensalism in the genus Ranzovius (Hemiptera: Miridae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 86::68–81. Google Scholar

Appendices

Fig. 1.

Tallula watsoni, adult male; wingspread 16.0 mm

i0015-4040-87-4-554-f01.gif

Fig. 2.

Tallula watsoni: A: Adult; B: Pupa suspended in webbing; C: Larva in webbing; D: Larva in webbing with Anelosimus studiosus. Lines = 2 mm

i0015-4040-87-4-554-f02.jpg
Mark Deyrup, Johanna Kraus, and Thomas Eisner "A FLORIDA CATERPILLAR AND OTHER ARTHROPODS INHABITING THE WEBS OF A SUBSOCIAL SPIDER (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE; ARANEIDA: THERIDIIDAE)," Florida Entomologist 87(4), 554-558, (1 December 2004). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2004)087[0554:AFCAOA]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 December 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top